Alyssa Pradhan, Annmarie Bosco, Justin Beardsley, Wei-Yuen Su
Background/aims: To assess the effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) on days of therapy (DOT) of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy (EBAT).
Methods: A single-centre, prospective cohort study of adult haematology patients admitted with FN from 1 May to 30 November 2022, compared with a retrospective cohort of patients admitted from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. AMS intervention involved infectious diseases advice at weekly haematology meetings to encourage cessation of EBAT for patients with FN who were clinically stable with no isolated source. Primary outcome was duration and agent of EBAT DOT for patients without an identifiable source of fever.
Findings: For FN without an identifiable infective source, mean DOT was significantly shorter (7.1 vs 5.0 days (P = 0.04)). There was also a significant increase in the number of patients for whom EBAT was ceased prior to neutrophil recovery in the prospective cohort (40% vs 61%, P = 0.016). For patients without an identified source, duration of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem therapy decreased from 2018-2021 to 2022, with a trend towards significance (6.1 vs 4.4, P = 0.07; 12.7 vs 4.4, P = 0.07 respectively). There was no increase in recurrence of fever, antibiotic escalation, intensive care unit admission or death within 30 days in the post-intervention group.
Interpretation: We demonstrate that an AMS intervention decreased EBAT duration for patients without a source of infection.
背景/目的:评估抗菌素管理(AMS)干预对血液病患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)经验性广谱抗生素治疗(EBAT)治疗日(DOT)的有效性。方法:对2022年5月1日至11月30日住院的成年血液病FN患者进行单中心前瞻性队列研究,并与2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日住院的患者进行回顾性队列研究。医疗辅助队的干预措施包括在每周血液学会议上提供传染病建议,以鼓励临床稳定且无孤立源的FN患者停止EBAT。主要结局是无明显发热来源患者的EBAT DOT持续时间和药物。结果:对于没有可识别传染源的FN,平均DOT明显缩短(7.1天vs 5.0天(P = 0.04))。在前瞻性队列中,在中性粒细胞恢复前停用EBAT的患者数量也显著增加(40% vs 61%, P = 0.016)。对于来源不明的患者,2018-2021年至2022年,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和美罗培南治疗的持续时间减少,且有显著趋势(6.1 vs 4.4, P = 0.07; 12.7 vs 4.4, P = 0.07)。在干预后30天内,发烧复发、抗生素用量增加、重症监护病房入院或死亡均未增加。解释:我们证明了AMS干预可以减少无感染源患者的EBAT持续时间。
{"title":"Early de-escalation of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenia.","authors":"Alyssa Pradhan, Annmarie Bosco, Justin Beardsley, Wei-Yuen Su","doi":"10.1111/imj.70330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) on days of therapy (DOT) of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy (EBAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre, prospective cohort study of adult haematology patients admitted with FN from 1 May to 30 November 2022, compared with a retrospective cohort of patients admitted from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. AMS intervention involved infectious diseases advice at weekly haematology meetings to encourage cessation of EBAT for patients with FN who were clinically stable with no isolated source. Primary outcome was duration and agent of EBAT DOT for patients without an identifiable source of fever.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>For FN without an identifiable infective source, mean DOT was significantly shorter (7.1 vs 5.0 days (P = 0.04)). There was also a significant increase in the number of patients for whom EBAT was ceased prior to neutrophil recovery in the prospective cohort (40% vs 61%, P = 0.016). For patients without an identified source, duration of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem therapy decreased from 2018-2021 to 2022, with a trend towards significance (6.1 vs 4.4, P = 0.07; 12.7 vs 4.4, P = 0.07 respectively). There was no increase in recurrence of fever, antibiotic escalation, intensive care unit admission or death within 30 days in the post-intervention group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We demonstrate that an AMS intervention decreased EBAT duration for patients without a source of infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gayle Radley, Marianne S Elston, Ben Lawrence, Veronica Boyle
The role of anti-resorptive agents in patients with bone metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms is unclear. Our aim was to review bone-specific treatment recommendations by the New Zealand National Neuroendocrine Tumour Multidisciplinary Meeting (MDM). Recommendations for bone-specific treatment were given at 29/365 MDMs (7.9%); 44.8% were confirmed to have received the recommended therapy. Bone-specific treatment recommendations were infrequent; there is a need for more data on the role of anti-resorptive agents in this group.
{"title":"Recommendations for bone-directed therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumour skeletal metastases at the New Zealand National Neuroendocrine Tumour Multidisciplinary Meeting.","authors":"Gayle Radley, Marianne S Elston, Ben Lawrence, Veronica Boyle","doi":"10.1111/imj.70268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of anti-resorptive agents in patients with bone metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms is unclear. Our aim was to review bone-specific treatment recommendations by the New Zealand National Neuroendocrine Tumour Multidisciplinary Meeting (MDM). Recommendations for bone-specific treatment were given at 29/365 MDMs (7.9%); 44.8% were confirmed to have received the recommended therapy. Bone-specific treatment recommendations were infrequent; there is a need for more data on the role of anti-resorptive agents in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Epilepsy is a prevalent chronic neurological disorder marked by recurrent seizures, affecting over 70 million people worldwide. This review offers an up-to-date guide for general physicians, general practitioners and general neurology trainees on diagnosing and managing epilepsy, emphasising the importance of early referral to specialist teams. It discusses the epidemiology, significant societal burden and common comorbidities-including cognitive, psychiatric and cardiovascular conditions-which contribute to reduced quality of life and increased mortality, including sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. The article outlines a structured approach to first seizures and their mimics, emphasising the role of electroencephalography and neuroimaging in diagnosis. Medical management centres on seizure control through anti-seizure medications (ASMs), but up to one-third of patients develop drug-resistant epilepsy, necessitating specialist interventions such as epilepsy surgery or neuromodulation. Accurate seizure classification and tailored treatment plans, including consideration of ASM teratogenicity in women of childbearing age, are essential. Case vignettes illustrate complex scenarios requiring specialist multidisciplinary evaluation. This review reinforces that timely specialist input can significantly enhance outcomes in patients with challenging or refractory epilepsy.
{"title":"Approach to epilepsy: overview and update of diagnosis and management.","authors":"Arash Kahrom, Camelia Soo, Noorasyikin Arifin, Aileen McGonigal","doi":"10.1111/imj.70326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epilepsy is a prevalent chronic neurological disorder marked by recurrent seizures, affecting over 70 million people worldwide. This review offers an up-to-date guide for general physicians, general practitioners and general neurology trainees on diagnosing and managing epilepsy, emphasising the importance of early referral to specialist teams. It discusses the epidemiology, significant societal burden and common comorbidities-including cognitive, psychiatric and cardiovascular conditions-which contribute to reduced quality of life and increased mortality, including sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. The article outlines a structured approach to first seizures and their mimics, emphasising the role of electroencephalography and neuroimaging in diagnosis. Medical management centres on seizure control through anti-seizure medications (ASMs), but up to one-third of patients develop drug-resistant epilepsy, necessitating specialist interventions such as epilepsy surgery or neuromodulation. Accurate seizure classification and tailored treatment plans, including consideration of ASM teratogenicity in women of childbearing age, are essential. Case vignettes illustrate complex scenarios requiring specialist multidisciplinary evaluation. This review reinforces that timely specialist input can significantly enhance outcomes in patients with challenging or refractory epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Trish Kahawita, Amanda Fischer, Lachlan Webb, Phillip Good
Background: With an ageing population, there is an increasing demand for home-based palliative care to improve end-of-life care. Funding models can impact service utilisation and patient outcomes.
Aims: To compare two funding models to assess the effects on service utilisation, hospital admission, home death rates and concordance between preferred and actual place of death.
Methods: A single-centre, prospective cohort study compared the first 12 months of two funding models. Eligible patients accessing a private health insurance-funded palliative care programme were included. Each funding model had different eligibility criteria: the capitation model (May 2020-April 2021) required a ≤3-month prognosis and preference for home death, while the fee-for-service model (December 2022-November 2023) had a ≤6-month prognosis with no preference.
Results: The capitation cohort had fewer hospital admissions (27% vs. 64%) in the last 4 weeks of life, and a higher rate in home or a residential aged care facility (78% vs. 31%). Concordance with preferred place of death was similar across cohorts (91% vs. 76%). Except for assistants in nursing, the fee-for-service cohort accessed more services, with utilisation increasing near death. In the final 4 weeks, the capitation cohort had higher service use (median 14 vs. 7) and more involvement of assistants in nursing (40% vs. 5%) and medical practitioners (60% vs. 35%).
Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to look into funding models and how funding mechanisms influence service utilisation, intensity and timing. While trends emerged, cohort differences led to variability and limited interpretation.
{"title":"Funding the final chapter: capitation versus fee-for-service: a single-centre, prospective cohort study comparing funding models in home-based palliative care.","authors":"Trish Kahawita, Amanda Fischer, Lachlan Webb, Phillip Good","doi":"10.1111/imj.70320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70320","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With an ageing population, there is an increasing demand for home-based palliative care to improve end-of-life care. Funding models can impact service utilisation and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare two funding models to assess the effects on service utilisation, hospital admission, home death rates and concordance between preferred and actual place of death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre, prospective cohort study compared the first 12 months of two funding models. Eligible patients accessing a private health insurance-funded palliative care programme were included. Each funding model had different eligibility criteria: the capitation model (May 2020-April 2021) required a ≤3-month prognosis and preference for home death, while the fee-for-service model (December 2022-November 2023) had a ≤6-month prognosis with no preference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The capitation cohort had fewer hospital admissions (27% vs. 64%) in the last 4 weeks of life, and a higher rate in home or a residential aged care facility (78% vs. 31%). Concordance with preferred place of death was similar across cohorts (91% vs. 76%). Except for assistants in nursing, the fee-for-service cohort accessed more services, with utilisation increasing near death. In the final 4 weeks, the capitation cohort had higher service use (median 14 vs. 7) and more involvement of assistants in nursing (40% vs. 5%) and medical practitioners (60% vs. 35%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is one of the first studies to look into funding models and how funding mechanisms influence service utilisation, intensity and timing. While trends emerged, cohort differences led to variability and limited interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Lam, C. Khor, S. Hultin, J. J. Cheung, N. A. Shah
{"title":"‘Shroom’ for concern: a case of psychedelic mushroom-induced acute kidney injury","authors":"M. Lam, C. Khor, S. Hultin, J. J. Cheung, N. A. Shah","doi":"10.1111/imj.70313","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imj.70313","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"140-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Natalie L Y Ngu, Edward Saxby, Thomas Worland, Stephanie Yung, Patricia Anderson, Jo Hunter, Erin Russell, Alexander Mitropoulos, Chania Lobo, Poh Wein Loh, William Sievert, Sally Bell, Suong Le
Background: Novel models of ambulatory care have been used in chronic disease management, but implementation in advanced chronic liver disease remains limited.
Aims: We aimed to explore clinical outcomes of a multidisciplinary clinic for patients with chronic liver disease.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients attending a multidisciplinary liver clinic between February 2019 and May 2024. The clinic comprised co-located hepatologists, a dietitian, a pharmacist and an addiction medicine specialist, coordinated by a hepatology nurse. Patients accessed on-site point-of-care ultrasound, abdominal paracentesis and albumin infusions. The primary outcome was liver-related admission. Secondary outcomes were 12-month admission-free survival and change in liver disease prognostic scores at 3 and 6 months.
Results: A total of 285 patients were included, of whom 61% were men, 56% had alcohol-related liver disease and 95% had cirrhosis. The median baseline model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 14.6 (interquartile range (IQR): 10.6-18.9) and 52% were in Child-Pugh B class at index appointment. The liver-related admission rate was 33% at a median of 546 days (IQR: 149-1095 days) from index appointment, and 12-month admission-free survival was 40.4% (IQR: 34.6-46.1). Median MELD improved at 3 months (12.8 months (IQR: 9.8-15.9 months), P < 0.05) and plateaued by 6 months (11.9 months (IQR: 9.4-16.2 months), P = 0.29). The proportion of patients with ascites decreased at each time point (54% vs 35% vs 27%, P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Two-thirds of patients attending a multidisciplinary liver clinic had no subsequent liver-related admissions, with a median 18-month latency to admission in the remainder. Co-location of clinicians and supportive measures may contribute to these findings.
{"title":"Five-year outcomes of a dedicated, multidisciplinary clinic for decompensated cirrhosis.","authors":"Natalie L Y Ngu, Edward Saxby, Thomas Worland, Stephanie Yung, Patricia Anderson, Jo Hunter, Erin Russell, Alexander Mitropoulos, Chania Lobo, Poh Wein Loh, William Sievert, Sally Bell, Suong Le","doi":"10.1111/imj.70321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Novel models of ambulatory care have been used in chronic disease management, but implementation in advanced chronic liver disease remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to explore clinical outcomes of a multidisciplinary clinic for patients with chronic liver disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients attending a multidisciplinary liver clinic between February 2019 and May 2024. The clinic comprised co-located hepatologists, a dietitian, a pharmacist and an addiction medicine specialist, coordinated by a hepatology nurse. Patients accessed on-site point-of-care ultrasound, abdominal paracentesis and albumin infusions. The primary outcome was liver-related admission. Secondary outcomes were 12-month admission-free survival and change in liver disease prognostic scores at 3 and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 285 patients were included, of whom 61% were men, 56% had alcohol-related liver disease and 95% had cirrhosis. The median baseline model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 14.6 (interquartile range (IQR): 10.6-18.9) and 52% were in Child-Pugh B class at index appointment. The liver-related admission rate was 33% at a median of 546 days (IQR: 149-1095 days) from index appointment, and 12-month admission-free survival was 40.4% (IQR: 34.6-46.1). Median MELD improved at 3 months (12.8 months (IQR: 9.8-15.9 months), P < 0.05) and plateaued by 6 months (11.9 months (IQR: 9.4-16.2 months), P = 0.29). The proportion of patients with ascites decreased at each time point (54% vs 35% vs 27%, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two-thirds of patients attending a multidisciplinary liver clinic had no subsequent liver-related admissions, with a median 18-month latency to admission in the remainder. Co-location of clinicians and supportive measures may contribute to these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>At the suggestion of our College President, I visited the College library. It is not the sort of place I would usually frequent: picture musty old leather-bound books, dense wood panelling and an air of staleness—dare I say it—sadness. But I was in Sydney and somewhat at a loose end, so visit I did.</p><p>I have been to 145 Macquarie on numerous occasions for <i>Internal Medicine Journal</i> (IMJ) board meetings and love the board room where our band of editors bring joy and I am never alone. Less so the library. I was warmly welcomed by Karen, but evidently she had more important guests elsewhere, and I was promptly left to my own devices. In contrast to the board room, the library was devoid of life.</p><p>Around me sat silent shelves crammed with leather-bound tomes. Positioned on display here and there were medical implements from bygone eras. I have always found displays of these things more than slightly ghoulish. Images of inadequate anaesthesia spring to mind. Being of a slightly sensitive disposition, I find it deeply disconcerting to be viewing these sorts of implements. I actively seek to avoid such exposures.</p><p>And then there were the black-and-white photographs of Australian doctors of old. Seemingly every one of them was a man with a ridiculous hat, all unsmiling, as was the expectation with photography of the time. How different, I thought, from my editorial team of today.</p><p>The previous day had gone well. I had chaired my first IMJ Editorial Board meeting: the first person not named Jeff Szer to have done so for 21 years. My agenda, not the written pre-circulated one, but the real one that I told people about only on the day, was to make it about the people. He tangata, he tangata, he tangata. That is the most important thing, the people. The editors of this Journal give hours of their time every week for scant acknowledgement and certainly no financial compensation. I wanted to reward them with a day that would be collegial, entertaining and informative and that would highlight for them how special their group is. I was nervous. Jeff's are big shoes to fill, but all-in-all, the day seemed to have gone well.</p><p>So back to the library. Feeling out of place, standing alone, I spied the shelves in the Journals section. I steered in that direction and discovered that in front of me were shelves holding the earliest issues of both IMJ and the <i>New Zealand Medical Journal</i> (NZMJ). As a New Zealander and the current custodian for the IMJ I felt that I owed it to the Journals to have a look at both of them. I picked the first issue of each off the shelf and made my way to the more welcoming environs of the Fellows' lounge. There I promptly found myself comfortable in a leather chair in front of the open fireplace.</p><p>Oldest first, I started with the first issue of NZMJ, published in 1887. The introduction was written by David Colquhoun. I sat in a lecture theatre named after him when I was at medical school in Dunedi
在学院院长的建议下,我参观了学院图书馆。这不是我通常会光顾的地方:我想象着发霉的旧皮面书,密密麻麻的木镶板和一种陈腐的——我敢说——悲伤的气氛。但我当时在悉尼,有点闲,所以我就去了。我曾多次去麦考瑞145号参加《内科医学杂志》(Internal Medicine Journal, IMJ)的董事会会议,我很喜欢这里的董事会会议室,我们的编辑团队在这里给我带来欢乐,我从不孤单。图书馆就不是这样了。我受到了凯伦的热情欢迎,但显然她在别的地方有更重要的客人,我很快就被打发走了。与董事会会议室相比,图书馆毫无生气。在我周围坐着安静的书架,里面塞满了皮革装订的大部头书。这里那里陈列着过去时代的医疗器械。我总是觉得这些东西的展示有点令人毛骨悚然。麻醉不足的画面浮现在脑海中。作为一个稍微敏感的人,我发现看到这些工具是非常令人不安的。我积极寻求避免这样的暴露。然后是老澳大利亚医生的黑白照片。似乎他们每个人都是一个男人,戴着一顶可笑的帽子,都没有笑,这是当时对摄影的期望。我想,这和我今天的编辑团队是多么不同啊。前一天过得很顺利。我第一次主持了IMJ编委会会议:这是21年来第一个不叫杰夫·斯泽尔的人主持编委会会议。我的议程,不是书面的预先分发的,而是真正的,我只在那天告诉人们的,就是让它成为人民的事情。tangata, tangata, tangata。最重要的是人民。《华尔街日报》的编辑们每周花费数小时的时间,却很少得到认可,当然也没有经济补偿。我想奖励他们一天,这一天将是学院式的,有趣的,有知识的,这将突出他们的小组是多么的特别。我很紧张。杰夫的工作很艰巨,但总的来说,这一天似乎过得很顺利。所以回到图书馆。我独自站在那里,感觉格格不入,于是我窥探了期刊区的书架。我朝那个方向走去,发现我面前的架子上放着IMJ和新西兰医学杂志(NZMJ)的最早一期。作为一名新西兰人和IMJ的现任保管人,我觉得我有责任看看这两本杂志。我从书架上各拿了第一期,然后朝更受欢迎的休息室走去。在那里,我很快发现自己舒服地坐在壁炉前的一张皮椅子上。最古老的,我从1887年出版的第一期《NZMJ》开始。介绍是由大卫·科尔霍恩写的。当我在达尼丁的医学院读书时,我坐在一个以他的名字命名的演讲厅里,从那次经历中我对他一无所知。在这里,我了解到他写得很好,非常好,当然比今天IMJ的平均提交者要好得多,性别歧视的语言除外。我了解到,对大卫·科尔霍恩来说,成为一名好医生很重要;他关心他的病人,想要尽他所能地应用科学,并且和我们今天所有人一样怀疑他所做的是否真的对我们的病人有益。如果你能原谅性别问题,我将把他的一些话粘贴在这篇文章的末尾,因为它们今天仍然相关。我坐在145号壁炉前的皮椅上,把学院学术期刊的第一期通读了一遍。我被我读到的东西打动了。这些戴着可笑的帽子、留着大胡子的白人是富有同情心、科学和智慧的人。他们为病人尽了最大的努力。他们不是那些黑白照片上的人。我感到很惭愧,因为我仅仅根据外表就对他们做出了可怕的假设。在他们的学术努力中,这些早期的医生显示出他们是有素质的人。他们勤奋地报告病例,以帮助他们的同事和未来的病人。他们了解专业人士之间开放交流的必要性,他们也确实了解科学。他们和我们今天的任何人一样致力于推动澳大利亚和新西兰的医学发展。我很幸运有机会参观了麦格理145号。我鼓励所有的研究员在某个时候都这样做。你不必急于这样做;我们一直都很穷,人们希望并期望这个设施在未来的许多年里都能在那里。但说真的,你们应该找个时间在145点打电话过来,看看图书馆,然后在研究员休息室里沉思几分钟。这是你的大学,你应该去看看。好的方面可能会让你大吃一惊;它对我有影响。
{"title":"I visited 145 Macquarie Street","authors":"Paul Gavin Bridgman","doi":"10.1111/imj.70314","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imj.70314","url":null,"abstract":"<p>At the suggestion of our College President, I visited the College library. It is not the sort of place I would usually frequent: picture musty old leather-bound books, dense wood panelling and an air of staleness—dare I say it—sadness. But I was in Sydney and somewhat at a loose end, so visit I did.</p><p>I have been to 145 Macquarie on numerous occasions for <i>Internal Medicine Journal</i> (IMJ) board meetings and love the board room where our band of editors bring joy and I am never alone. Less so the library. I was warmly welcomed by Karen, but evidently she had more important guests elsewhere, and I was promptly left to my own devices. In contrast to the board room, the library was devoid of life.</p><p>Around me sat silent shelves crammed with leather-bound tomes. Positioned on display here and there were medical implements from bygone eras. I have always found displays of these things more than slightly ghoulish. Images of inadequate anaesthesia spring to mind. Being of a slightly sensitive disposition, I find it deeply disconcerting to be viewing these sorts of implements. I actively seek to avoid such exposures.</p><p>And then there were the black-and-white photographs of Australian doctors of old. Seemingly every one of them was a man with a ridiculous hat, all unsmiling, as was the expectation with photography of the time. How different, I thought, from my editorial team of today.</p><p>The previous day had gone well. I had chaired my first IMJ Editorial Board meeting: the first person not named Jeff Szer to have done so for 21 years. My agenda, not the written pre-circulated one, but the real one that I told people about only on the day, was to make it about the people. He tangata, he tangata, he tangata. That is the most important thing, the people. The editors of this Journal give hours of their time every week for scant acknowledgement and certainly no financial compensation. I wanted to reward them with a day that would be collegial, entertaining and informative and that would highlight for them how special their group is. I was nervous. Jeff's are big shoes to fill, but all-in-all, the day seemed to have gone well.</p><p>So back to the library. Feeling out of place, standing alone, I spied the shelves in the Journals section. I steered in that direction and discovered that in front of me were shelves holding the earliest issues of both IMJ and the <i>New Zealand Medical Journal</i> (NZMJ). As a New Zealander and the current custodian for the IMJ I felt that I owed it to the Journals to have a look at both of them. I picked the first issue of each off the shelf and made my way to the more welcoming environs of the Fellows' lounge. There I promptly found myself comfortable in a leather chair in front of the open fireplace.</p><p>Oldest first, I started with the first issue of NZMJ, published in 1887. The introduction was written by David Colquhoun. I sat in a lecture theatre named after him when I was at medical school in Dunedi","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imj.70314","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maria Livia Burzo, Giuseppe De Matteis, Amato Serra, Davide Antonio Della Polla, Mariella Fuorlo, Maria Anna Nicolazzi, Benedetta Simeoni, Antonio Gasbarrini, Francesco Franceschi, Giovanni Gambassi, Marcello Covino
Background: Previous studies have identified distinct subgroups (phenogroups) of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Aims: This study aims to identify distinct phenotypes in older patients with HFpEF hospitalised for acute heart failure (AHF) and investigate the relationship between subgroups and outcomes.
Methods: Retrospective, single-center study, including patients ≥65 years hospitalised for AHF over a 4-year period. We used electronic medical records to collect clinical data, including hospital outcomes. Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify clusters of clinical phenogroups. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality.
Results: Overall, 770 patients were included. Based on LCA, three phenogroups were identified. Phenogroup 1 (n = 323) had both the lowest burden of comorbidities and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptides (NT proBNP) values. Phenogroup 2 (n = 224) had the oldest patients (median age 82 years), the highest prevalence of women (62%) and atrial fibrillation and the worst right ventricular function. Phenogroup 3 (n = 223) consisted mainly of men (57%) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes, obesity and established cardiovascular disease and the worst renal function. Phenogroups 2 and 3 showed a significantly higher risk of primary outcome than phenogroup 1. In addition, survival analysis showed that phenogroup 2 had the worst prognosis, with more than double the risk of in-hospital death.
Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of older patients with HFpEF hospitalised for AHF, we identified three subgroups with significantly different features and prognoses. Phenomapping may be an effective tool to identify individuals most likely to experience adverse outcomes, providing a basis for phenotype-specific treatment strategies.
{"title":"Phenotyping of acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: real-world outcomes in a cohort of older patients.","authors":"Maria Livia Burzo, Giuseppe De Matteis, Amato Serra, Davide Antonio Della Polla, Mariella Fuorlo, Maria Anna Nicolazzi, Benedetta Simeoni, Antonio Gasbarrini, Francesco Franceschi, Giovanni Gambassi, Marcello Covino","doi":"10.1111/imj.70324","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have identified distinct subgroups (phenogroups) of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to identify distinct phenotypes in older patients with HFpEF hospitalised for acute heart failure (AHF) and investigate the relationship between subgroups and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study, including patients ≥65 years hospitalised for AHF over a 4-year period. We used electronic medical records to collect clinical data, including hospital outcomes. Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify clusters of clinical phenogroups. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 770 patients were included. Based on LCA, three phenogroups were identified. Phenogroup 1 (n = 323) had both the lowest burden of comorbidities and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptides (NT proBNP) values. Phenogroup 2 (n = 224) had the oldest patients (median age 82 years), the highest prevalence of women (62%) and atrial fibrillation and the worst right ventricular function. Phenogroup 3 (n = 223) consisted mainly of men (57%) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes, obesity and established cardiovascular disease and the worst renal function. Phenogroups 2 and 3 showed a significantly higher risk of primary outcome than phenogroup 1. In addition, survival analysis showed that phenogroup 2 had the worst prognosis, with more than double the risk of in-hospital death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world cohort of older patients with HFpEF hospitalised for AHF, we identified three subgroups with significantly different features and prognoses. Phenomapping may be an effective tool to identify individuals most likely to experience adverse outcomes, providing a basis for phenotype-specific treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Direct-to-consumer telemedicine services have become increasingly popular, allowing consumers to access virtual consultations and electronic prescriptions. However, the expansion of this innovation raises concerns surrounding safety, privacy and ethics. There is a need for formal evaluation within the Australian healthcare landscape to harness the benefits of DTC platforms while maintaining high-value and high-quality care.
{"title":"Direct-to-consumer healthcare and its expanding role in the Australian healthcare system","authors":"Jessie T. Lu, Deshan F. Sebaratnam","doi":"10.1111/imj.70316","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imj.70316","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Direct-to-consumer telemedicine services have become increasingly popular, allowing consumers to access virtual consultations and electronic prescriptions. However, the expansion of this innovation raises concerns surrounding safety, privacy and ethics. There is a need for formal evaluation within the Australian healthcare landscape to harness the benefits of DTC platforms while maintaining high-value and high-quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"133-136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}