Abigayle G Rocca, William G Greendyke, E Yoko Furuya, Daniel E Freedberg
Objective: We evaluated whether patient perceptions of cleanliness are associated with objective measures of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as an early indicator of facility-level CDI rates and prevention.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis of Medicare-certified hospitals across the United States.
Methods: Data from the CMS Hospital Compare website and U.S. Census Bureau from 2023 were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models. The primary outcome was C. difficile standardized infection ratios (SIRs) compared to the national average. The primary exposure was patient-rated cleanliness star ratings from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey.
Results: The population studied was 3,616 medicare-certified hospitals with an estimated 17,994,034 unique patient admissions. There was no association between better patient-rated cleanliness and improved CDI performance. Facilities with a 5-star cleanliness rating were not more likely to have an SIR less than or equal to the national average compared to those with a lower star rating. For every 1% increase in patients who reported their room and bathroom as always clean, the odds of CDI observed cases being higher than predicted increases by 4.2% (ie, increasing patient-related cleanliness was weakly associated with worse CDI performance).
Conclusions: Patient-rated cleanliness was not associated with improved CDI performance in U.S. national hospital data. Findings were consistent across multiple operationalizations of cleanliness and CDI suggesting patient perceptions of cleanliness are not a strong indicator of CDI control measure performance.
{"title":"Relationship between patient-rated cleanliness and <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> standardized infection ratios in U.S. medicare-certified hospitals.","authors":"Abigayle G Rocca, William G Greendyke, E Yoko Furuya, Daniel E Freedberg","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10336","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated whether patient perceptions of cleanliness are associated with objective measures of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI), as an early indicator of facility-level CDI rates and prevention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of Medicare-certified hospitals across the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the CMS Hospital Compare website and U.S. Census Bureau from 2023 were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models. The primary outcome was <i>C. difficile</i> standardized infection ratios (SIRs) compared to the national average. The primary exposure was patient-rated cleanliness star ratings from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The population studied was 3,616 medicare-certified hospitals with an estimated 17,994,034 unique patient admissions. There was no association between better patient-rated cleanliness and improved CDI performance. Facilities with a 5-star cleanliness rating were not more likely to have an SIR less than or equal to the national average compared to those with a lower star rating. For every 1% increase in patients who reported their room and bathroom as always clean, the odds of CDI observed cases being higher than predicted increases by 4.2% (ie, increasing patient-related cleanliness was weakly associated with worse CDI performance).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-rated cleanliness was not associated with improved CDI performance in U.S. national hospital data. Findings were consistent across multiple operationalizations of cleanliness and CDI suggesting patient perceptions of cleanliness are not a strong indicator of CDI control measure performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ramara E Walker, Rebecca Schulte, Andrea M Pallotta, Ming Wang, Abhishek Deshpande, Michael Rothberg
Objective: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality in the US. Studies report racial disparities in various infectious syndromes. Our objective was to assess the relationship between patient race and antibiotic prescribing in inpatient CAP management.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: 11 Cleveland Clinic community hospitals.
Patients: Patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized with CAP between November 1, 2022, and January 31, 2025.
Methods: Parametric and non-parametric methods were used to describe demographic and clinical differences by race. The association between race and extended spectrum antibiotic (ESA) guideline concordance was assessed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, admission source, area deprivation index (ADI), hospital, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, renal failure, liver disease, immunocompromising condition, alcohol and substance use disorder, dialysis, and clinical instability and severity on day 1.
Results: In bivariate analyses, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients were less likely than NHW patients to receive ESA guideline-concordant CAP therapy (63.2% vs 64.4%; OR = 0.91, P = .2). After adjusting for patient characteristics, there were no differences between NHB and NHW patients in receipt of ESA therapy (adjusted OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.83, 1.00). After adjusting for hospital, NHB patients were more likely to receive ESA guideline-concordant CAP therapy (adjusted OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.30).
Conclusion: NHB patients were more likely to receive ESA-guideline concordant therapy, but this was influenced by where they sought care. Further studies are needed to understand why prescribing varies across hospitals.
目的:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是美国住院和死亡的主要原因。研究报告了各种感染综合征的种族差异。我们的目的是评估住院CAP管理中患者种族与抗生素处方之间的关系。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:11家克利夫兰诊所社区医院。患者:2022年11月1日至2025年1月31日期间因CAP住院的年龄≥18岁的患者。方法:采用参数和非参数方法描述不同种族的人口统计学和临床差异。采用多变量logistic回归模型对年龄、性别、入院来源、区域剥夺指数(ADI)、医院、糖尿病、心血管疾病、慢性呼吸系统疾病、肾功能衰竭、肝脏疾病、免疫功能低下、酒精和物质使用障碍、透析、第1天临床不稳定和严重程度进行调整,评估种族与扩展谱抗生素(ESA)指南一致性之间的关系。结果:在双变量分析中,非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)患者比NHW患者更不可能接受符合ESA指南的CAP治疗(63.2% vs 64.4%; OR = 0.91, P = 0.2)。在调整患者特征后,NHB和NHW患者在接受ESA治疗方面没有差异(调整OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.83, 1.00)。调整医院因素后,NHB患者更有可能接受符合ESA指南的CAP治疗(调整后OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.30)。结论:NHB患者更有可能接受esa指南的一致性治疗,但这受到他们寻求护理的地点的影响。需要进一步的研究来理解为什么不同医院的处方不同。
{"title":"Racial disparities in antibiotic selection for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients.","authors":"Ramara E Walker, Rebecca Schulte, Andrea M Pallotta, Ming Wang, Abhishek Deshpande, Michael Rothberg","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality in the US. Studies report racial disparities in various infectious syndromes. Our objective was to assess the relationship between patient race and antibiotic prescribing in inpatient CAP management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>11 Cleveland Clinic community hospitals.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized with CAP between November 1, 2022, and January 31, 2025.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parametric and non-parametric methods were used to describe demographic and clinical differences by race. The association between race and extended spectrum antibiotic (ESA) guideline concordance was assessed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, admission source, area deprivation index (ADI), hospital, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, renal failure, liver disease, immunocompromising condition, alcohol and substance use disorder, dialysis, and clinical instability and severity on day 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In bivariate analyses, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients were less likely than NHW patients to receive ESA guideline-concordant CAP therapy (63.2% vs 64.4%; OR = 0.91, <i>P</i> = .2). After adjusting for patient characteristics, there were no differences between NHB and NHW patients in receipt of ESA therapy (adjusted OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.83, 1.00). After adjusting for hospital, NHB patients were more likely to receive ESA guideline-concordant CAP therapy (adjusted OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NHB patients were more likely to receive ESA-guideline concordant therapy, but this was influenced by where they sought care. Further studies are needed to understand why prescribing varies across hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John Ahern, Cindy Noyes, Lindsay Smith, W Kemper Alston
{"title":"\"Sustained reductions in the incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms: A 24-year experience\".","authors":"John Ahern, Cindy Noyes, Lindsay Smith, W Kemper Alston","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10375","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Harjot Kaur Singh, Barbara Ross, Joyce Hannah, Serena Ting, Chloe Teasdale, Xiao Wang, Margaret Quinn, David Calfee, Matthew Simon, Heidi Torres, Karen Acker, Harold Horowitz, Tina Wang, Nuwan Gunawardhana, Robin Golderg, Yolima Salazar, Nishant Prasad, Nadia Jagnatnarain, Candace Johnson, David Kuang, Adam Gouveia, Yoko Furuya, Karen Westervelt, Lisa Saiman
Background: An improved understanding of the epidemiology of hospital-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (HO-MRSA BSI) could inform future prevention strategies for HO-MRSA BSI.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of HO-MRSA BSI reported to NHSN from 2020-2023 at a system of 9 acute care hospitals located in New York City. The primary outcome was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with HO-MRSA BSI. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of tertiary (TH) and community (CH) hospitals, standardized infection ratio (SIR) and rates per 10,000 patient-discharges, presumptive potential infectious sources, and mortality.
Results: Between 2020 and 2023, 222 patients had HO-MRSA BSI. Their median age was 65 years, 139 (63%) were male, 92 (41%) had central lines, 89 (40%) were in ICUs, and 63 (28%) were on a ventilator. These characteristics were similar across the 176 (79%) patients in TH and the 46 (21%) patients in CH. SIRs were similar across each year of the study (with cumulative SIRs of 0.815 overall, 1.412 [CH] and 0.732 [TH]). Overall HO-MRSA BSI rates ranged from 2.58-3.53 per 10,000 patient-discharges. The most common sources of HO-MRSA BSI were pneumonia (41%), SSTIs (17%), CLABSIs (13%), and PIV catheter-related issues (9%). The all-cause mortality rate was 35%.
Discussion: The unchanged HO-MRSA BSI SIRs in this study support the need for additional interventions that focus on prevention of the primary sources of MRSA infections. Ongoing systematic surveillance of the primary sources of HO-MRSA BSI should be implemented to inform and monitor best practices for prevention.
{"title":"Hospital-onset methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bloodstream infections within tertiary and community hospitals and implications for prevention.","authors":"Harjot Kaur Singh, Barbara Ross, Joyce Hannah, Serena Ting, Chloe Teasdale, Xiao Wang, Margaret Quinn, David Calfee, Matthew Simon, Heidi Torres, Karen Acker, Harold Horowitz, Tina Wang, Nuwan Gunawardhana, Robin Golderg, Yolima Salazar, Nishant Prasad, Nadia Jagnatnarain, Candace Johnson, David Kuang, Adam Gouveia, Yoko Furuya, Karen Westervelt, Lisa Saiman","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An improved understanding of the epidemiology of hospital-onset methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bloodstream infection (HO-MRSA BSI) could inform future prevention strategies for HO-MRSA BSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of HO-MRSA BSI reported to NHSN from 2020-2023 at a system of 9 acute care hospitals located in New York City. The primary outcome was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with HO-MRSA BSI. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of tertiary (TH) and community (CH) hospitals, standardized infection ratio (SIR) and rates per 10,000 patient-discharges, presumptive potential infectious sources, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2020 and 2023, 222 patients had HO-MRSA BSI. Their median age was 65 years, 139 (63%) were male, 92 (41%) had central lines, 89 (40%) were in ICUs, and 63 (28%) were on a ventilator. These characteristics were similar across the 176 (79%) patients in TH and the 46 (21%) patients in CH. SIRs were similar across each year of the study (with cumulative SIRs of 0.815 overall, 1.412 [CH] and 0.732 [TH]). Overall HO-MRSA BSI rates ranged from 2.58-3.53 per 10,000 patient-discharges. The most common sources of HO-MRSA BSI were pneumonia (41%), SSTIs (17%), CLABSIs (13%), and PIV catheter-related issues (9%). The all-cause mortality rate was 35%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The unchanged HO-MRSA BSI SIRs in this study support the need for additional interventions that focus on prevention of the primary sources of MRSA infections. Ongoing systematic surveillance of the primary sources of HO-MRSA BSI should be implemented to inform and monitor best practices for prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Richard H Drew, Nicholas A Turner, Elizabeth Keil, Jessica Seidelman
In a propensity-matched cohort of adult cardiac or neurosurgical procedures (n = 1,342), infection was less frequent with continuous infusion (1.8%) versus intermittent cefazolin (2.4%), though the difference was statistically non-significant (-0.6%, 95% CI-2.3 to 1.1; p = 0.57). The 0% infection rate among cardiac cases receiving continuous cefazolin infusion warrants further investigation.
{"title":"Comparison of cefazolin administered as a continuous or intermittent infusion for prophylaxis of surgical site infections in adult patients undergoing cardiac or neurologic surgery.","authors":"Richard H Drew, Nicholas A Turner, Elizabeth Keil, Jessica Seidelman","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a propensity-matched cohort of adult cardiac or neurosurgical procedures (<i>n</i> = 1,342), infection was less frequent with continuous infusion (1.8%) versus intermittent cefazolin (2.4%), though the difference was statistically non-significant (-0.6%, 95% CI-2.3 to 1.1; <i>p</i> = 0.57). The 0% infection rate among cardiac cases receiving continuous cefazolin infusion warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica Lynn Webster, Claudine T Jurkovitz, Brisa N Sánchez, Stephen Eppes, Neal D Goldstein
Objective: To deconstruct the multiple levels of risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infection, using multilevel models (MLMs) accounting for patient movement.
Study design and setting: Case-control study of patients hospitalized in three acute care Delaware hospitals, December 2019-December 2023.
Patients: Cases were patients aged ≥18 years who tested positive for hospital-onset C. difficile infection. Controls were patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized more than 72 hours, who did not test positive for C. difficile infection.
Methods: Hierarchical and cross-classified MLMs were used to calculate odds of C. difficile infection based on patient-level risk factors and to evaluate the variation in odds of infection attributable to environmental risk factors using the hospital unit(s) a patient was assigned to during hospitalization.
Results: Our study included 1,223 patients (249 cases, 974 controls). In both models, greater odds of infection were associated with antibiotic exposure [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 11.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.19, 17.40; aOR = 12.80, 95% CI = 8.46, 19.40 for hierarchical and cross-classified models respectively] and health insurance (aOR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.68; aOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.53; public vs. private). Median odds ratios (MOR) for both models indicated greater relevance of between-unit heterogeneity in the outcome than health insurance but less than antibiotic exposure (MOR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.56, 2.30 and 2.71 95% CI = 2.10, 4.06).
Conclusion: Using multilevel methods accounting for patient movement, we found that while antibiotic use is the most important risk factor in patients that developed C. difficile infection, environmental risk factors are additionally important and should be considered in research involving hospitalized patients and healthcare-associated infections.
目的:利用考虑患者运动的多层模型(MLMs)解构艰难梭菌感染的多层危险因素。研究设计和设置:2019年12月- 2023年12月在特拉华州三家急症护理医院住院的患者的病例对照研究。患者:患者年龄≥18岁,医院发病艰难梭菌感染检测呈阳性。对照组为住院72小时以上、年龄≥18岁、艰难梭菌感染检测未呈阳性的患者。方法:使用分层和交叉分类MLMs计算基于患者级别危险因素的艰难梭菌感染几率,并使用患者住院期间分配到的医院单位评估可归因于环境危险因素的感染几率的变化。结果:我们的研究纳入了1223例患者(249例,974例对照)。在两种模型中,较高的感染几率与抗生素暴露相关[调整优势比(aOR) = 11.20, 95%可信区间(CI) = 7.19, 17.40;aOR = 12.80, 95% CI = 8.46, 19.40(分别为分层和交叉分类模型)和健康保险(aOR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.68; aOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.53;公立与私立)。两种模型的中位优势比(MOR)表明,结果单位间异质性的相关性大于健康保险,但小于抗生素暴露(MOR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.56, 2.30和2.71,95% CI = 2.10, 4.06)。结论:使用考虑患者运动的多层次方法,我们发现抗生素使用是难辨梭菌感染患者最重要的危险因素,环境危险因素也很重要,在涉及住院患者和医疗保健相关感染的研究中应考虑到环境危险因素。
{"title":"Estimating the impact of patient-level risk factors and time-varying hospital unit on healthcare-associated <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection using cross-classified multilevel models.","authors":"Jessica Lynn Webster, Claudine T Jurkovitz, Brisa N Sánchez, Stephen Eppes, Neal D Goldstein","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10356","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To deconstruct the multiple levels of risk factors for <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection, using multilevel models (MLMs) accounting for patient movement.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>Case-control study of patients hospitalized in three acute care Delaware hospitals, December 2019-December 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Cases were patients aged ≥18 years who tested positive for hospital-onset <i>C. difficile</i> infection. Controls were patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized more than 72 hours, who did not test positive for <i>C. difficile</i> infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hierarchical and cross-classified MLMs were used to calculate odds of <i>C. difficile</i> infection based on patient-level risk factors and to evaluate the variation in odds of infection attributable to environmental risk factors using the hospital unit(s) a patient was assigned to during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 1,223 patients (249 cases, 974 controls). In both models, greater odds of infection were associated with antibiotic exposure [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 11.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.19, 17.40; aOR = 12.80, 95% CI = 8.46, 19.40 for hierarchical and cross-classified models respectively] and health insurance (aOR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.68; aOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.53; public vs. private). Median odds ratios (MOR) for both models indicated greater relevance of between-unit heterogeneity in the outcome than health insurance but less than antibiotic exposure (MOR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.56, 2.30 and 2.71 95% CI = 2.10, 4.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using multilevel methods accounting for patient movement, we found that while antibiotic use is the most important risk factor in patients that developed <i>C. difficile</i> infection, environmental risk factors are additionally important and should be considered in research involving hospitalized patients and healthcare-associated infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle S Jerry, Vianelly García, Andrea S Greenfield, Stefanie A Lane, Hang Lee, Anjali Nemorin, Eileen F Searle, Chloe V Green, Erica S Shenoy
Objective: To explore the impact of an immersive virtual reality (VR) training module on infection prevention and control (IPC) knowledge and attitudes of healthcare personnel (HCP) and to demonstrate the use of VR for performance assessment in cleaning and disinfection of portable medical equipment (PME).
Design: Quasi-experimental study.
Setting: Two academic medical centers and three long-term care facilities.
Participants: HCP in clinical roles were recruited.
Methods: Pilot sites trained participants on an immersive VR training module on PME cleaning and disinfection. Participants completed the VR module and pre- and post-knowledge and attitude assessment surveys, including a post-survey on the user experience of the VR module. Performance data were collected from the head-mounted displays (HMD) on the duration of the VR session, and participant performance including in-module task completion, hand hygiene compliance, PME disinfection percentage, and in-module quiz performance. Statistical significance and effect size were calculated using paired sample t-tests and Cohen's D for pre- and post-survey results. HMD data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: A total of 60 participants were recruited; 54 were included for analysis, with improvements in knowledge and attitudes post-training. Participant user experience was rated 50.19/55. HMD data demonstrated: 22-minute mean module duration, mean of 2.15/28 tasks not completed, mean of 2.56 missed hand hygiene opportunities, and 54% PME mean disinfection percentage, and varied performance on in-module quizzes.
Conclusions: Immersive VR training may be effective in improving HCP knowledge and attitudes in IPC concepts. Performance data collected through VR training can evaluate learner performance and be used to target training for improvement.
{"title":"Real learning in a virtual world: a pilot study of the impact of virtual reality training on IPC knowledge and confidence.","authors":"Michelle S Jerry, Vianelly García, Andrea S Greenfield, Stefanie A Lane, Hang Lee, Anjali Nemorin, Eileen F Searle, Chloe V Green, Erica S Shenoy","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the impact of an immersive virtual reality (VR) training module on infection prevention and control (IPC) knowledge and attitudes of healthcare personnel (HCP) and to demonstrate the use of VR for performance assessment in cleaning and disinfection of portable medical equipment (PME).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two academic medical centers and three long-term care facilities.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>HCP in clinical roles were recruited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pilot sites trained participants on an immersive VR training module on PME cleaning and disinfection. Participants completed the VR module and pre- and post-knowledge and attitude assessment surveys, including a post-survey on the user experience of the VR module. Performance data were collected from the head-mounted displays (HMD) on the duration of the VR session, and participant performance including in-module task completion, hand hygiene compliance, PME disinfection percentage, and in-module quiz performance. Statistical significance and effect size were calculated using paired sample t-tests and Cohen's D for pre- and post-survey results. HMD data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 participants were recruited; 54 were included for analysis, with improvements in knowledge and attitudes post-training. Participant user experience was rated 50.19/55. HMD data demonstrated: 22-minute mean module duration, mean of 2.15/28 tasks not completed, mean of 2.56 missed hand hygiene opportunities, and 54% PME mean disinfection percentage, and varied performance on in-module quizzes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Immersive VR training may be effective in improving HCP knowledge and attitudes in IPC concepts. Performance data collected through VR training can evaluate learner performance and be used to target training for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145633024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Germán G Vargas-Cuebas, William Stribling, Melissa J Martin, Shannon Gettings, Rhonda Wells, Maureen Sevilla, Kathryn Polaskey, Lan Preston, Yoon I Kwak, Patrick T Mc Gann, Francois Lebreton, Jason W Bennett
An outbreak of emm92/ST82 Streptococcus pyogenes was detected through prospective genomic surveillance at a military treatment facility. Twenty-one of twenty-six patients had confirmed epidemiological links to grappling sports. One case resulted from household transmission. The benefits of routine surveillance extend beyond the hospital environment enabling the detection of community-driven transmission.
{"title":"Routine genomic surveillance in a military healthcare facility detected a community-based Group A <i>Streptococcus</i> outbreak associated with grappling sports.","authors":"Germán G Vargas-Cuebas, William Stribling, Melissa J Martin, Shannon Gettings, Rhonda Wells, Maureen Sevilla, Kathryn Polaskey, Lan Preston, Yoon I Kwak, Patrick T Mc Gann, Francois Lebreton, Jason W Bennett","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An outbreak of <i>emm92</i>/ST82 <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> was detected through prospective genomic surveillance at a military treatment facility. Twenty-one of twenty-six patients had confirmed epidemiological links to grappling sports. One case resulted from household transmission. The benefits of routine surveillance extend beyond the hospital environment enabling the detection of community-driven transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Heather L Young, Carolyn Valdez, Diana Mancini, Sarah Gardiner, Kelly Medero, Rosine Angbanzan, Timothy C Jenkins
This anonymous survey of hospitalists and acute care nurses evaluated awareness of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) presence and decision-making regarding PIVC insertion, maintenance, and removal. Nurses were most aware of PIVC presence and regarded as best to make decisions about PIVC, yet <50% of respondents felt nurses should remove PIVC without an order.
{"title":"Assessment of healthcare providers' knowledge and decision-making patterns in peripheral intravenous catheter management in acute care settings.","authors":"Heather L Young, Carolyn Valdez, Diana Mancini, Sarah Gardiner, Kelly Medero, Rosine Angbanzan, Timothy C Jenkins","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10352","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This anonymous survey of hospitalists and acute care nurses evaluated awareness of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) presence and decision-making regarding PIVC insertion, maintenance, and removal. Nurses were most aware of PIVC presence and regarded as best to make decisions about PIVC, yet <50% of respondents felt nurses should remove PIVC without an order.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caitlin Naureckas Li, Amanda Bonebrake, Erica Mansavage, Amy Moravec, Lauren Weisert, Inga Uremovich, David Winlaw, Catherine Collins
Objective: Cardiovascular surgeries can be lifesaving, but mediastinitis following these procedures results in increased morbidity and mortality. We sought to increase the number of days between cases of mediastinitis at our institution from an average of 58 to greater than 223 days, the upper control limit of our baseline data.
Design: Quality improvement initiative.
Setting: Freestanding pediatric hospital.
Methods: We convened a multidisciplinary team to identify potential interventions. As many infections were not captured by the Solutions for Patient Safety definition, we monitored mediastinitis cases using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition. Our outcome measure was cases of mediastinitis. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were completed within our operating rooms (ORs) and cardiac care unit (CCU). We tracked measures on statistical process control charts and with descriptive statistics.
Results: From a baseline of 58 days, our hospital has gone over 450 days without a case of mediastinitis. No special causes were noted in our balancing measures. All process measures showed improvement.
Conclusions: A series of OR- and CCU-based interventions significantly increased the amount of time between our cases of mediastinitis. This work highlights the importance of engaging both OR and postoperative stakeholders in proactive mediastinitis prevention work.
{"title":"Reducing mediastinitis following pediatric cardiovascular surgeries: a quality improvement initiative.","authors":"Caitlin Naureckas Li, Amanda Bonebrake, Erica Mansavage, Amy Moravec, Lauren Weisert, Inga Uremovich, David Winlaw, Catherine Collins","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10366","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10366","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cardiovascular surgeries can be lifesaving, but mediastinitis following these procedures results in increased morbidity and mortality. We sought to increase the number of days between cases of mediastinitis at our institution from an average of 58 to greater than 223 days, the upper control limit of our baseline data.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quality improvement initiative.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Freestanding pediatric hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened a multidisciplinary team to identify potential interventions. As many infections were not captured by the Solutions for Patient Safety definition, we monitored mediastinitis cases using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition. Our outcome measure was cases of mediastinitis. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were completed within our operating rooms (ORs) and cardiac care unit (CCU). We tracked measures on statistical process control charts and with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a baseline of 58 days, our hospital has gone over 450 days without a case of mediastinitis. No special causes were noted in our balancing measures. All process measures showed improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A series of OR- and CCU-based interventions significantly increased the amount of time between our cases of mediastinitis. This work highlights the importance of engaging both OR and postoperative stakeholders in proactive mediastinitis prevention work.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145596437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}