Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology最新文献

Consultations with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion revealed patient harms associated with ophthalmic care. Adherence to core infection prevention and control principles, tailored guidance for ophthalmic settings, and compliance with manufacturing and compounding standards could decrease adverse events and patient exposures to contaminated products.

Objective: To describe neutropenic fever management practices among healthcare institutions.

Design: Survey.

Participants: Members of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network (SRN) representing healthcare institutions within the United States.

Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to SRN representatives, with questions pertaining to demographics, antimicrobial prophylaxis, supportive care, and neutropenic fever management. The survey was distributed from fall 2022 through spring 2023.

Results: 40 complete responses were recorded (54.8% response rate), with respondent institutions accounting for approximately 15.7% of 2021 US hematologic malignancy hospitalizations and 14.9% of 2020 US bone marrow transplantations. Most entities have institutional guidelines for neutropenic fever management (35, 87.5%) and prophylaxis (31, 77.5%), and first-line treatment included IV antipseudomonal antibiotics (35, 87.5% cephalosporin; 5, 12.5% penicillin; 0, 0% carbapenem).We observed significant heterogeneity in treatment course decisions, with roughly half (18, 45.0%) of respondents continuing antibiotics until neutrophil recovery, while the remainder having criteria for de-escalation prior to neutrophil recovery. Respondents were more willing to de-escalate prior to neutrophil recovery in patients with identified clinical (27, 67.5% with pneumonia) or microbiological (30, 75.0% with bacteremia) sources after dedicated treatment courses.

Conclusions: We found substantial variation in the practice of de-escalation of empiric antibiotics relative to neutrophil recovery, highlighting a need for more robust evidence for and adoption of this practice. No respondents use carbapenems as first-line therapy, comparing favorably to prior survey studies conducted in other countries.

Background: Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen increasingly recognized as a cause of healthcare-associated infections including outbreaks.

Methods: We performed a mixed-methods study to characterize the emergence of C. auris in the state of Maryland from 2019 to 2022, with a focus on socioeconomic vulnerability and infection prevention opportunities. We describe all case-patients of C. auris among Maryland residents from June 2019 to December 2021 detected by Maryland Department of Health. We compared neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) with and without C. auris transmission outbreaks using both the social vulnerability index (SVI) and the area deprivation index (ADI). The SVI and the ADI were obtained at the state level, with an SVI ≥ 75th percentile or an ADI ≥ 80th percentile considered severely disadvantaged. We summarized infection control assessments at SNFs with outbreaks using a qualitative analysis.

Results: A total of 140 individuals tested positive for C. auris in the study period in Maryland; 46 (33%) had a positive clinical culture. Sixty (43%) were associated with a SNF, 37 (26%) were ventilated, and 87 (62%) had a documented wound. Separate facility-level neighborhood analysis showed SNFs with likely C. auris transmission were disproportionately located in neighborhoods in the top quartile of deprivation by the SVI, characterized by low socioeconomic status and high proportion of racial/ethnic minorities. Multiple infection control deficiencies were noted at these SNFs.

Conclusion: Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability may contribute to the emergence and transmission of C. auris in a community.

Background: Frequently used physical therapy (PT) equipment is difficult to disinfect due to equipment material and shape. The efficacy of standard disinfection of PT equipment is poorly understood.

Methods: We completed a 2-phase prospective microbiological analysis of fomites used in PT at our hospital from September 2022 to October 2023. For both phases, study fomites were obtained after usage and split into symmetrical halves for sampling. In phase 1, sides were sampled following standard disinfection. In phase 2, sides were randomized 1:1 to intervention or control. Samples were obtained before and after the intervention, a disinfection cabinet using Ultraviolet C (UV-C) and 6% nebulized hydrogen peroxide. We defined antimicrobial-resistant clinically important pathogens (AMR CIP) as methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Multidrug resistant (MDR)-Gram-negatives and non-AMR CIP as methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Vancomycin sensitive Enterococcus (VSE), and Gram-negatives. Three assessments were made: 1) contamination following standard disinfection (phase 1), 2) contamination postintervention compared to no disinfection (phase 2) and, 3) contamination following standard disinfection compared to postintervention (phase 1 vs phase 2 intervention).

Results: The median total colony-forming units (CFU) from 122 study fomite samples was 1,348 (IQR 398-2,365). At the sample level, 52(43%) and 15(12%) of samples harbored any clinically important pathogens (CIPs) or AMR CIPs, respectively. The median CFU was 0 (IQR 0-55) in the intervention group and 977 (409-2,547) in the control group (P < .00001).

Conclusion: Following standard disinfection, PT equipment remained heavily contaminated including AMR and non-AMR CIPs. Following the intervention, PT equipment was less contaminated and harbored no AMR CIPs compared to control sides supporting the efficacy of the intervention on difficult-to-disinfect PT fomites.

Objective: Klebsiella pneumoniae are common pathogens causing bloodstream infection (BSI) that increasingly express carbapenem resistance worldwide. To date, no study has precisely investigated the impact of carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae (CRKP) BSI on mortality.

Methods: This retrospective study included 87 patients with CRKP BSI and 321 patients with carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae (CSKP) BSI from 2015 to 2020. Propensity score analyses with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW-S) was applied to balance covariates. The hazard ratio for 30-day mortality associated with carbapenem resistance was estimated using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results: The 30-day crude mortality rates were 43.7% in patients with CRKP BSI and 17.8% in patients with CSKP BSI (P < .001). Age ≥55 years, underlying hematological malignancies and hemodialysis were independently associated with mortality in CRKP BSI. A skin or soft-tissue infection source, urinary catheter, and underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were predictors of mortality in CSKP BSI. The group characteristics were well balanced after IPTW-S. The adjusted hazard ratio for 30-day mortality for CRKP BSI was 1.607 (interquartile range, 0.814-3.171).

Conclusions: Carbapenem resistance was not associated with a significant increase in 30-day mortality in KP BSI; patient and disease factors were primary determinants of outcomes.

Throughout history, pandemics and their aftereffects have spurred society to make substantial improvements in healthcare. After the Black Death in 14^th century Europe, changes were made to elevate standards of care and nutrition that resulted in improved life expectancy.¹ The 1918 influenza pandemic spurred a movement that emphasized public health surveillance and detection of future outbreaks and eventually led to the creation of the World Health Organization Global Influenza Surveillance Network.² In the present, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed many of the pre-existing problems within the US healthcare system, which included (1) a lack of capacity to manage a large influx of contagious patients while simultaneously maintaining routine and emergency care to non-COVID patients; (2) a "just in time" supply network that led to shortages and competition among hospitals, nursing homes, and other care sites for essential supplies; and (3) longstanding inequities in the distribution of healthcare and the healthcare workforce. The decades-long shift from domestic manufacturing to a reliance on global supply chains has compounded ongoing gaps in preparedness for supplies such as personal protective equipment and ventilators. Inequities in racial and socioeconomic outcomes highlighted during the pandemic have accelerated the call to focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within our communities. The pandemic accelerated cooperation between government entities and the healthcare system, resulting in swift implementation of mitigation measures, new therapies and vaccinations at unprecedented speeds, despite our fragmented healthcare delivery system and political divisions. Still, widespread misinformation or disinformation and political divisions contributed to eroded trust in the public health system and prevented an even uptake of mitigation measures, vaccines and therapeutics, impeding our ability to contain the spread of the virus in this country.³ Ultimately, the lessons of COVID-19 illustrate the need to better prepare for the next pandemic. Rising microbial resistance, emerging and re-emerging pathogens, increased globalization, an aging population, and climate change are all factors that increase the likelihood of another pandemic.⁴.