International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics最新文献

Objective: Irinotecan (IRI) is an anticancer drug that is frequently used to treat colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers. Its side effects include cholinergic symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and hyperhidrosis. Anticholinergic medicines are frequently used for treatment or prophylaxis; however, the risk factors for the failure of a single prophylactic anticholinergic administration remain unclear. Moreover, an appropriate anticholinergic drug for prophylaxis remains unknown. Thus, we aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs for IRI-induced cholinergic symptoms and to evaluate the usefulness of multiple prophylactic doses of anticholinergic drugs.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent IRI treatment for colorectal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer and received prophylactic anticholinergic drugs for IRI-induced cholinergic symptoms (n = 135) were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs. We also evaluated the efficacy of multiple prophylactic anticholinergic drug administration.

Results: Based on univariate and multivariate analyses, colorectal cancer, female sex, and prophylactic use of scopolamine butyl bromide were identified as risk factors for failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs. The efficacy of multiple prophylactic doses was confirmed to be 95% of the patients who had a single prophylactic failure due to temporary effect but symptom appearance after a certain period of time (wearing-off).

Conclusion: We determined that colorectal cancer, female sex, and prophylactic use of scopolamine butyl bromide were risk factors associated with the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs, and that multiple prophylactic doses for wearing-off can be a promising method.

Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SB17 (Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea), a proposed biosimilar of ustekinumab (UST) against reference UST (Stelara, Janssen Biotech, Horsham, PA, USA).

Materials and methods: This double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, single-dose study randomized 201 healthy adult subjects 1 : 1 : 1 to receive 45 mg of SB17, European Union-sourced UST (EU-UST) or United States of America-sourced UST (US-UST) via subcutaneous (SC) injection. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_inf) and maximum serum concentration (C_max). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were investigated.

Results: All 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of AUC_inf and C_max between groups were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 0.8 - 1.25. The geometric LSMeans ratios of AUC_inf and C_max were 0.99 and 0.90 for SB17/EU-UST, 1.01 and 0.94 for SB17/US-UST, and 1.02 and 1.05 for EU-UST/US-UST, respectively. The proportion of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was comparable between SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST (68.7, 58.2, and 65.7%). No deaths, serious adverse events (SAEs), or severe TEAEs were reported. The incidence of subjects testing positive for post-dose anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) was 26.9%, 34.3%, and 34.3% in the SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST groups, respectively. Among the subjects with a positive ADA result at day 99/end of study, 53.8% (SB17 n = 5, EU-UST n = 12, and US-UST n = 11) were positive for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated bioequivalence of SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST in terms of PK. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were also comparable between all groups.

Objective: The risk of malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with methotrexate (MTX) and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) combination therapy is unknown. This study aimed to clarify the incidence of malignancy and the recommended monitoring period in patients receiving this combination therapy.

Materials and methods: A retrospective, observational study based on a large Japanese medical claims database was conducted between April 2013 and February 2020. Patients with RA were classified into MTX-alone and combination therapy groups, and the standardized incidence rates (SIR) of malignancy were calculated. The time of onset of malignancy in both groups was calculated.

Results: In total, 2,052 patients received MTX-alone and 782 received combination therapy. The incidence of malignant lymphoma was significantly higher with MTX-alone therapy (SIR: 6.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58 - 10.61) and combination therapy (SIR: 20.86, 95% CI: 8.53 - 33.19) than in the general Japanese population. Furthermore, the combination therapy had a significantly higher risk of malignant lymphoma than the MTX-alone therapy (adjusted odds ratio: 4.27, 95% CI: 1.64 - 11.12). The median time from MTX prescription to the onset of malignant lymphoma was 3.58 years (interquartile range (IQR): 2.00 - 5.34 years) for MTX-alone and 3.42 years (IQR: 1.25 - 4.92 years) for combination therapy.

Conclusion: The incidence of malignant lymphoma in the combination therapy group was extensively higher than that in the general Japanese population. Special attention is required for early symptoms of malignant lymphoma, particularly in the 3^rd - 4^th year after initiating MTX therapy.

Objective: To determine the safety of cabazitaxel and predictors of severe neutropenia caused by cabazitaxel in a patient population that includes those with comorbidities.

Materials and methods: Of 42 prostate cancer patients treated with cabazitaxel at Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital between September 2014 and June 2022, 33 were included in this study, whereas 6 patients who were outpatients and 3 who were discharged early within 7 days upon patient request were excluded. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine predictors of severe neutropenia.

Results: Of the 33 eligible patients, 24 had comorbidities, with hypertension being the most common (n = 19), followed by dyslipidemia (n = 14) and diabetes (n = 11). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of severe neutropenia due to any of the comorbidities, depending on the presence or absence of the comorbidity. However, the rate of severe neutropenia was significantly higher in patients with baseline platelet levels < 22.4×10⁴/μL and those receiving cabazitaxel doses > 34 mg/body. In the final model adjusted for age, body mass index, C-reactive protein, and monocyte count, lower baseline platelet levels and higher doses of cabazitaxel were also predictors of the development of severe neutropenia.

Conclusion: Comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, liver dysfunction, and cardiac disease did not affect the incidence of severe neutropenia in patients receiving cabazitaxel. The baseline platelet count and the dose of cabazitaxel were also suggested to be markers for the development of severe neutropenia.

Objective: Famotidine, an H₂ receptor antagonist (H₂RA), is mainly prescribed to alleviate the early symptoms of gastritis. Our aim was to explore the possibilities of low-dose esomeprazole as a treatment of gastritis as well as the pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of esomeprazole and famotidine.

Materials and methods: A randomized, multiple-dose, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover study was conducted with a 7-day washout between periods. For each period, the subjects were administered one dose of esomeprazole 10 mg or famotidine 20 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg each day. To evaluate the PDs, the 24-hour gastric pH was recorded after single and multiple doses. The mean percentage of time during which the gastric pH was above 4 was evaluated for PD assessment. To confirm the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of esomeprazole, blood was collected for up to 24 hours after multiple doses.

Results: 26 subjects completed the study. Following the multiple doses of esomeprazole 10 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg, and famotidine 20 mg, the mean percentages of time during which the gastric pH was above 4 over the course of 24 hour were 35.77 ± 19.56%, 53.75 ± 20.55%, and 24.48 ± 17.36%, respectively. After multiple doses, the time of peak plasma concentration at steady state (t_max,ss) was 1.00 and 1.25 hours for 10 and 20 mg of esomeprazole, respectively. The geometric mean ratio and its 90% confidence interval of area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve in steady state (AUC_T,ss) and maximum concentration of drug in plasma in steady state (C_max,ss) for esomeprazole 10 mg compared to 20 mg were 0.3654 (0.3381 - 0.3948) and 0.5066 (0.4601 - 0.5579), respectively.

Conclusion: The PD parameters of esomeprazole 10 mg were comparable to those of famotidine after multiple doses. These findings provide support for further evaluating the use of 10 mg of esomeprazole as a treatment option for gastritis.

Purpose: Tegoprazan is a differentiated gastric acid-pump blocker and belongs to a class of potassium-competitive acid secretion blockers. An orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) of tegoprazan was developed to improve patient compliance. The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profiles between the conventional tablet (as the reference drug) and the ODT (as the test drug) of 50 mg tegoprazan in healthy Korean subjects.

Materials and methods: An open-label, randomized, single-dose, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 48 healthy subjects. All subjects received a single oral dose of tegoprazan 50 mg tablet with water, tegoprazan 50 mg ODT with water, and tegoprazan 50 mg ODT without water. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 hours after dosing. Plasma concentrations of tegoprazan and its metabolite M1 were measured by LC-MS/MS, and PK parameters were calculated with a non-compartmental method. Safety was evaluated by means of assessed adverse events, physical examinations, laboratory test results as well as measurements of vital signs and ECG throughout the study.

Results: A total of 47 subjects completed the study. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for AUC_t, C_max, and AUC_inf of tegoprazan were 0.8873 - 0.9729, 0.8865 - 1.0569, and 0.8835 - 0.9695 for the test drug with water to the reference drug and 0.9169 - 1.0127, 0.9569 - 1.1276, and 0.9166 - 1.0131 for the test drug without water to the reference drug, respectively. There were no serious adverse events, and all adverse events were mild.

Conclusion: The PK profiles of tegoprazan were equivalent between the conventional tablet and ODT with or without water. There was no significant difference in the safety profiles. Therefore, the novel ODT of tegoprazan that can be taken without water may improve compliance among patients with acid-related diseases.

Objective: Palindromic rheumatism (PR) is characterized by interstitial inflammation, redness, and pain in joints and periarticular tissues. However, the pathogenesis and treatment of PR remain unknown. Herein, we report on the first use of iguratimod (IGU) - a novel small-molecule compound with anti-inflammatory effects - in the treatment of refractory PR.

Case: A male patient aged 70 years was diagnosed with PR based on medical history, clinical manifestations, and ultrasound findings. The patient was treated with IGU (25 mg PO q.d.). The disease activity was measured by the frequency of PR flares and clinical symptoms. The patient's laboratory tests were monitored for safety reasons.

Results: The use of IGU significantly improved pain symptoms and reduced flare frequency. After 28 days of treatment, abnormal levels of glutamic-pyruvic transaminase were observed. One month after discontinuation of IGU, flares occurred in the patient's second toe of both feet.

Conclusion: IGU provides a new treatment option for patients with refractory PR who cannot use hydroxychloroquine. The effective treatment with IGU suggests the potential pathogenesis of PR and provides a basis for physicians to choose a new drug for PR treatment.

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the lungs, with a high incidence and fatality rate of 30 - 40%. Despite the abundance of research on the pathogenesis of lung injury and the great progress that has been achieved, the various number of cells, cytokines and inflammatory response pathways involved in the pathogenesis of ALI and their complex relationships - which together constitute the cell network and inflammatory factor network of ALI inflammatory response - demand more attention. This study reviews the formation of this network in the pathogenesis of ALI.

Objective: Although some of the positive effects of consulting a clinical pharmacologist when using complex treatment schedules have been demonstrated, the factors determining treatment outcomes are largely unknown. A main aim of this study was to identify and analyze the factors associated with the treatment outcomes in hospital patients in whom a therapeutic plan proposed by a clinical pharmacologist had been accepted and implemented.

Materials and methods: The research was conducted as a retrospective cohort study on a random sample of 200 inpatients in the University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Serbia. The main outcome variables were i) in-hospital mortality, ii) inadequate clinical response to the therapy or pharmacological recommendations proposed by a clinical pharmacologist, iii) the total length of hospitalization, and iv) the length of hospitalization after consulting a clinical pharmacologist. The effect of putative predictors and confounders on the study outcomes were analyzed using multivariate regression models.

Results: Early integration of clinical pharmacologists in the course of patient treatment was associated with a reduction in the risk of a fatal outcome (OR = 1.146; 95% CI, 1.006 - 1.305; p = 0.040). Delay in consulting a clinical pharmacologist was associated with a longer overall length of patient hospitalization (B = 1.592; 95% CI, 1.100 - 2.084; p = 0.000). When the reasons for consulting a clinical pharmacologist involved the choice of drug or the occurrence of adverse drug reactions, the duration of hospitalization following the consultation was shorter by ~ 4 days (B = -4.337; 95% CI, -8.190 to -0.484; p = 0.028) and 12 days (B = -12.024; 95% CI, -19.108 to -4.940; p = 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: To achieve more favorable treatment outcomes in the case of difficult-to-treat hospital inpatients, clinical pharmacologists should be consulted early in the course of the disease, especially when the choice of drug is difficult, and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions is an important issue.