International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics最新文献

The direct-acting oral anticoagulant dabigatran etexilate (DE) targets thrombin and is used widely to prevent thromboembolism. A 79-year-old man was admitted to the Emergency Department due to anuria for 2 days. An urgent laboratory examination revealed a serum creatinine concentration of 888 µmol/L. He was diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic renal insufficiency. During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the coagulation test showed a severe reduction in the fibrinogen level as well as a significantly prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The patient had been taking DE (110 mg twice daily) for a long time and had not suspended the medication or reduced the dose during the worsening of anuria. Therefore, it should be evaluated before considering plasma replacement therapy for the patient, whether the abnormal coagulation parameters were induced by interference of excessive DE. Tentatively, we used activated charcoal to treat the plasma and then retested the fibrinogen, PT, and APTT. Results showed that the coagulation indices nearly returned to normal. The present case indicated that activated charcoal could adsorb DE in plasma effectively and eliminate its interference with coagulation test results, thereby providing support for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Objectives: Although the clinical role of protein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors for cholesterol management is increasing, the post-marketing period of use is short compared to other lipid-lowering drugs, so there is still insufficient evidence for their efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated preventive effects of stroke and cardiovascular (CV) events using evolocumab and alirocumab.

Materials and methods: We assessed the relative risk of stroke and CV events after alirocumab or evolocumab treatment in individuals with or without clinical CV diseases compared with that in controls. In addition, we evaluated the relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

Results: A total of 25 articles were included (median of study duration = 52 weeks). The risk of stroke was significantly decreased after treatment with alirocumab or evolocumab (primary prevention in patients without CV diseases: RR = 0.733; 95% CI, 0.618 - 0.870; secondary prevention in patients with CV diseases: RR = 0.703; 95% CI, 0.562 - 0.880). The risk of CV events also significantly decreased in patients treated with alirocumab or evolocumab (primary prevention: RR = 0.818; 95% CI, 0.777 - 0.861; secondary prevention: RR = 0.725; 95% CI, 0.578 - 0.910). The relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke was not significantly different between PCSK9 inhibitor-treated patients and controls (RR = 1.041; 95% CI, 0.690 - 1.573).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that evolocumab and alirocumab are significantly effective without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Based on this, the PCSK9 inhibitors can be highly recommended for cholesterol management.

Introduction: Malignant insulinoma is a rare neuroendocrine tumor responsible for excessive insulin secretion and life-threatening hypoglycemia episodes. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen can identify a pancreatic tumor corresponding to insulinoma. Loco-regional metastases define the metastatic cases. The first-line therapeutic approach is surgery, while other medical treatments like diazoxide and everolimus play also a role. These treatments have shown efficacy in regulating blood glucose and, to some extent, controlling tumor progression.

Case presentation: We present the case of a 48-year-old female who was admitted for severe hypoglycemia episodes. She presented neuroglycopenic symptoms without any other clinical features. High levels of C-peptide and insulin during severe hypoglycemia confirmed the presence of endogenous hyperinsulinism. The CT scan of the abdomen confirmed the existence of an insulinoma along with several hepatic metastases. Surgery was proposed as a first-line approach. However, due to the persistent occurrence of severe hypoglycemia episodes, other treatment options were necessary such as diazoxide and everolimus. Diazoxide caused a significant improvement in the patient's blood glucose levels. Nonetheless, glycemic control was unsustainable, obligating the switch to everolimus, which showed better control of blood glucose levels with challenging management due to the appearance of grade 3 stomatitis as a side effect. The patient died 1 year after the diagnosis due to tumor progression.

Conclusion: Balancing the benefits of enhanced glycemic control with the difficulties posed by side effect management of everolimus underscores the need to carefully consider both efficacy and potential adverse events.

Background: COVID-19 induces a pro-coagulant state with thrombotic events. This meta-analysis explores the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet-based therapy in COVID-19 patients through randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search until March 10, 2023, identified 7 RCTs involving 23,415 inpatients. Of these, 11,891 received antiplatelet-based treatment, and 11,524 received placebo/other drugs. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.

Results: The included trials involved patients with a mean age ranging from 54.3 to 62.0 years and a prevalence of hypertension ranging from 10.9 to 65.0% and coronary artery disease ranging from 3.2 to 32.7%. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in overall mortality between groups (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99 - 1.01, p = 0.76). However, antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced major thrombotic events (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 - 0.99, p = 0.04). Conversely, it increased major bleeding risks (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24 - 2.12, p = 0.0005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation and respiratory death.

Conclusion: Antiplatelet therapy does not confer mortality benefit in COVID-19 patients but lowers major thrombotic events while increasing major bleeding risks. Ongoing large RCTs will provide more information on the therapeutic value of this therapy.

Objective: Azvudine is an effective treatment for patients infected with common COVID-19. However, physicians have reported a series of adverse reactions, including multiple cases of liver injury, caused by azvudine in clinical practice. This study assessed the incidence, clinical features, and associated risk factors of liver injury induced by azvudine in real-world settings, offering guidance for safe clinical use.

Materials and methods: This study utilized the Chinese Hospital Pharmacovigilance System (CHPS) to retrospectively analyze the treatment of COVID-19 patients with azvudine at Changsha Central Hospital from December 19, 2022, to June 6, 2023. A case-control study was conducted to analyze the occurrence of azvudine-induced liver injury in COVID-19 patients who triggered a CHPS alert compared to normal COVID-19 patients.

Results: Among the total of 2,141 COVID-19 patients, 31 (1.45%) developed azvudine-induced liver injury, which is classified as an occasional adverse reaction. Liver injury was observed in 93.55% of patients between days 4 and 12 of the azvudine treatment, with elevated transaminases as the primary clinical manifestation. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses indicated that low albumin levels and co-administration of low-molecular-weight heparin were statistically significant risk factors (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This study represents the first investigation of azvudine-induced liver injury and high-risk patients using the CHPS. The findings provide valuable insights to promote the safety of anti-COVID-19 drugs, serving as an important reference for future drug safety measures.

Objective: Area under the curve (AUC)-based vancomycin dose adjustment is recommended to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. AUC estimation methods include Bayesian software programs and simple analytical equations. This study compared the AUC obtained using the Bayesian approach with that obtained using an equation-based approach.

Materials and methods: Patients receiving intravenous vancomycin for MRSA infection were included. Peak and trough levels were measured for each patient on days 3, 7, and 10 post vancomycin dosing (day 1). AUC was calculated using software based on the Bayesian method (MwPharm Online) and an equation-based calculator, Stanford Health Care (SHC) calculator.

Results: The AUC estimated using MwPharm Online was similar to that estimated using the SHC calculator. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and their 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) were 1.08 (1.05 - 1.11), 1.03 (0.99 - 1.07), and 0.99 (0.94 - 1.05) at days 3, 7, and 10, respectively. Furthermore, according to the software used, there were no significant differences in the proportions of patients in the categories "within" and "below or above" the AUC target range. Additionally, trough levels predicted by both software programs were lower than the observed ones. Still, there was no significant difference between the predicted and observed peak levels for both software programs on day 10.

Conclusion: AUC calculated using the Bayesian software allows for calculation with samples at a non-steady state, can integrate covariates, and is interconvertible with that estimated using an equation-based calculator, which is simpler and relies on fewer assumptions. Therefore, either method can be used, considering each method's strengths and limitations.

Objective: Irinotecan (IRI) is an anticancer drug that is frequently used to treat colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers. Its side effects include cholinergic symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and hyperhidrosis. Anticholinergic medicines are frequently used for treatment or prophylaxis; however, the risk factors for the failure of a single prophylactic anticholinergic administration remain unclear. Moreover, an appropriate anticholinergic drug for prophylaxis remains unknown. Thus, we aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs for IRI-induced cholinergic symptoms and to evaluate the usefulness of multiple prophylactic doses of anticholinergic drugs.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent IRI treatment for colorectal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer and received prophylactic anticholinergic drugs for IRI-induced cholinergic symptoms (n = 135) were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs. We also evaluated the efficacy of multiple prophylactic anticholinergic drug administration.

Results: Based on univariate and multivariate analyses, colorectal cancer, female sex, and prophylactic use of scopolamine butyl bromide were identified as risk factors for failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs. The efficacy of multiple prophylactic doses was confirmed to be 95% of the patients who had a single prophylactic failure due to temporary effect but symptom appearance after a certain period of time (wearing-off).

Conclusion: We determined that colorectal cancer, female sex, and prophylactic use of scopolamine butyl bromide were risk factors associated with the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs, and that multiple prophylactic doses for wearing-off can be a promising method.

Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SB17 (Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea), a proposed biosimilar of ustekinumab (UST) against reference UST (Stelara, Janssen Biotech, Horsham, PA, USA).

Materials and methods: This double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, single-dose study randomized 201 healthy adult subjects 1 : 1 : 1 to receive 45 mg of SB17, European Union-sourced UST (EU-UST) or United States of America-sourced UST (US-UST) via subcutaneous (SC) injection. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_inf) and maximum serum concentration (C_max). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were investigated.

Results: All 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of AUC_inf and C_max between groups were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 0.8 - 1.25. The geometric LSMeans ratios of AUC_inf and C_max were 0.99 and 0.90 for SB17/EU-UST, 1.01 and 0.94 for SB17/US-UST, and 1.02 and 1.05 for EU-UST/US-UST, respectively. The proportion of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was comparable between SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST (68.7, 58.2, and 65.7%). No deaths, serious adverse events (SAEs), or severe TEAEs were reported. The incidence of subjects testing positive for post-dose anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) was 26.9%, 34.3%, and 34.3% in the SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST groups, respectively. Among the subjects with a positive ADA result at day 99/end of study, 53.8% (SB17 n = 5, EU-UST n = 12, and US-UST n = 11) were positive for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated bioequivalence of SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST in terms of PK. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were also comparable between all groups.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and characterize all European Medicines Agency (EMA) approvals derived from adaptive designs in clinical trials and to provide an update of the current status of these drugs.

Materials and methods: Relevant files were identified in the EMA database for annual reports for the period between 2008 and 2020 using a list of suitable keywords related to adaptive designs. We recorded trial characteristics from drug approvals and used Fisher exact test to compare the characteristics.

Results: A total of 1,054 EMA approvals were identified, and the percentage of EMA approvals planned with adaptive trial designs increased from 1.85% in the period 2008 - 2012 to 6.19% in between 2017 - 2020. A total of 41 approvals were identified among 91 original EMA files that contained adaptive designs. The types of adaptive designs used in clinical trials increased after 2017 where the most common type used was the most common (17/41). Most approvals (32/41) comprised pivotal trials, and most assessments had not been accelerated (38/41). Of 32 confirmatory trials planned with adaptive designs, the proportion of those with additional monitoring (AM) increased significantly (p < 0.0001) from 0% in the 2008 - 2012 period to 90.48% in the 2017 - 2020 period. The percentage of approved antitumor drugs in approved drugs in ongoing clinical trials was 82.35%, compared to 20.83% in trials that were completed (p = 0.0001). The proportion of drug approved but where clinical trials were still ongoing in companies requiring post-authorization safety studies (PASSs) or post-authorization efficacy studies (PAESs) or who were granted conditional marketing authorization (CMA) significantly differed from the group of drugs approved where clinical trials were completed (p = 0.0230).

Conclusion: A trend showing an increased number of EMA approvals related to adaptive designs was observed for the period from 2008 to 2020. Different types of adaptive trial designs could be encouraged for the designation of clinical trials, especially for antitumor drugs; meanwhile, more stringent monitoring regulations seemed to be conducted for ongoing trials of antitumor drugs with adaptive design.