International journal of oncology最新文献

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is widely prevalent and represents a significant contributor to global cancer‑related mortality. There remains a pressing demand for advancements in CRC treatment modalities. The E3 ubiquitin ligase is a critical enzyme involved in modulating protein expression levels via posttranslational ubiquitin‑mediated proteolysis, and it is reportedly involved in the progression of various cancers, making it a target of recent interest in anticancer therapy. In the present study, using comprehensive expression analysis involving spatial transcriptomic analysis with single‑cell RNA sequencing in clinical CRC datasets, the ubiquitin‑associated protein Shank‑associated RH domain interactor (SHARPIN) was identified, located on amplified chromosome 8q, which could promote CRC progression. SHARPIN was found to be upregulated in tumor cells, with elevated expression observed in tumor tissues. This heightened expression of SHARPIN was positively associated with lymphatic invasion and served as an independent predictor of a poor prognosis in patients with CRC. In vitro and in vivo analyses using SHARPIN‑overexpressing or ‑knockout CRC cells revealed that SHARPIN overexpression upregulated MDM2, resulting in the downregulation of p53, while SHARPIN silencing or knockout downregulated MDM2, leading to p53 upregulation, which affects cell cycle progression, tumor cell apoptosis and tumor growth in CRC. Furthermore, SHARPIN was found to be overexpressed in several cancer types, exerting significant effects on survival outcomes. In conclusion, SHARPIN represents a newly identified novel gene with the potential to promote tumor growth following apoptosis inhibition and cell cycle progression in part by inhibiting p53 expression via MDM2 upregulation; therefore, SHARPIN represents a potential therapeutic target for CRC.

Integrins are a large family of cell adhesion molecules involved in tumor cell differentiation, migration, proliferation and neovascularization. Tumor cell‑derived exosomes carry a large number of integrins, which are closely associated with tumor progression. As crucial mediators of intercellular communication, exosomal integrins have gained attention in the field of cancer biology. The present review examined the regulatory mechanisms of exosomal integrins in tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and emphasized their notable roles in tumor initiation and progression. The potential of exosomal integrins as drug delivery systems in cancer treatment was explored. Additionally, the potential of exosomal integrins in clinical tumor prediction was considered, while summarizing their applications in diagnosis, prognosis assessment and treatment response prediction. Thus, the present review aimed to provide guidance and insights for future basic research and the clinical translation of exosomal integrins. The study of exosomal integrins is poised to offer new perspectives and methods for precise cancer treatment and clinical prediction.

Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that certain of the Transwell migration and invasion assay data panels shown in Figs. 3E and G and 7E and G on p. 1754 and 1757 respectively contained overlapping data panels, both within Fig. 3 and between Figs. 3 and 7, such that data which were intended to represent the results of differently performed experiments had apparently been derived from the same original sources. Specifically, the 'con' and 'pre-con' data panels in Fig. 3 were overlapping, as were the 'pre-con' and 'pcDNA.1-ROR1' panels comparing Fig. 3 with Fig. 7, and the Editorial Office subsequently pointed out to the authors that the 'con' and 'pre-con' data panels in Fig. 3E also contained an overlapping edge. After having examined their original data, the authors realized that these figures were inadvertently assembled incorrectly. The corrected versions of Figs. 3 and 7 are shown on the next page, now showing the correct data for the 'con' experiment in Fig. 3E, the 'pre-con' experiment in Fig. 3G, and the 'pcDNA.1-ROR1' panel in Fig. 7G. 'The authors are grateful to the Editor of International Journal of Oncology for granting them the opportunity to publish this corrigendum, and all the authors agree with its publication; furthermore, they apologize to the readership of the journal for any inconvenience caused. [International Journal of Oncology 48: 181-190, 2016; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3241].

The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is increasing, making it one of the prevalent malignancies among men. Metastasis of PCa to the bones poses the greatest danger to patients, potentially resulting in treatment ineffectiveness and mortality. At present, the management of patients with bone metastasis focuses primarily on providing palliative care. Research has indicated that the spread of PCa to the bones occurs through the participation of numerous molecules and their respective pathways. Gaining knowledge regarding the molecular processes involved in bone metastasis may result in the development of innovative and well‑tolerated therapies, ultimately enhancing the quality of life and prognosis of patients. The present article provides the latest overview of the molecular mechanisms involved in the formation of bone metastatic tumors from PCa. Additionally, the clinical outcomes of targeted drug therapies for bone metastasis are thoroughly analyzed. Finally, the benefits and difficulties of targeted therapy for bone metastasis of PCa are discussed, aiming to offer fresh perspectives for treatment.

Subsequently to the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, for the immunostaining experiments shown in Fig. 3C on p. 1195, the 'NEP' and 'PTX' panels contained overlapping data, such that data which were intended to show the results of differently performed experiments had apparently been derived from the same original source. After re‑examining their original data, the authors have realized that the 'PTX' data panel in Fig. 3C had inadvertently been selected incorrectly. The revised and corrected version of Fig. 3, showing the correct data for the 'PTX' data panel in Fig. 3C, is shown on on the next page. The authors are grateful to the Editor of International Journal of Oncology for allowing them this opportunity to publish this Corrigendum, and all the authors agree with its publication. Furthermore, the authors apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [International Journal of Oncology 41: 1192‑1198, 2012; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1586].

Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by concerned readers that β‑actin bands shown in Figs. 1, 2 and 4 were strikingly similar, where the experimental conditions reported in Fig. 4 differed from those in Figs. 1 and 2; moreover, the Slug protein bands featured in Figs. 4a and 5a were remarkably similar in spite of the different experimental conditions that were reported in the respective figure legends, and the shape of the vimentin protein bands in Fig. 5e bore a strong similarity to the Slug protein bands that were featured in Fig. 2c, in spite of the bands being of slightly different sizes and arranged in a different orientation.  Although the possibility of publishing a corrigendum was considered, software analysis of the highlighted bands performed independently by the Editorial Office demonstrated that the bands in question were likely to have been matching bands. Therefore, given the number of potential concerns that were identified with the assembly of various of the figures in this paper, the Editor of International Journal of Oncology has decided not to proceed with a corrigendum, and has determined that the paper should instead be retracted from the Journal on account of an overall lack of confidence in the originally presented data. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a satisfactory reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [International Journal of Oncology 46: 1461‑1472, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2878].

Macrophages have crucial roles in immune responses and tumor progression, exhibiting diverse phenotypes based on environmental cues. In the present study, the impact of cinobufagin (CB) on macrophage polarization and the consequences on tumor‑associated behaviors were investigated. Morphological transformations of THP‑1 cells into M0, M1 and M2 macrophages were observed, including distinct changes in the size, shape and adherence properties of these cells. CB treatment inhibited the viability of A549 and LLC cells in a concentration‑dependent manner, with an IC₅₀ of 28.8 and 30.12 ng/ml, respectively. CB at concentrations of <30 ng/ml had no impact on the viability of M0 macrophages and lung epithelial (BEAS‑2B) cells. CB influenced the expression of macrophage surface markers, reducing CD206 positivity in M2 macrophages without affecting CD86 expression in M1 macrophages. CB also altered certain expression profiles at the mRNA level, notably downregulating macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) expression in M2 macrophages and upregulating tumor necrosis factor‑α and interleukin‑1β in both M0 and M1 macrophages. Furthermore, ELISA analyses revealed that CB increased the levels of pro‑inflammatory cytokines in M1 macrophages and reduced the levels of anti‑inflammatory factors in M2 macrophages. CB treatment also attenuated the migration and invasion capacities of A549 and LLC cells stimulated by M2 macrophage‑conditioned medium. Additionally, CB modulated peroxisome proliferator‑activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and MARCO expression in M2 macrophages and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition in A549 cells, which was partially reversed by rosiglitazone, a PPARγ agonist. Finally, CB and cisplatin treatments hindered tumor growth in vivo, with distinct impacts on animal body weight and macrophage marker expression in tumor tissues. In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that CB exerted complex regulatory effects on macrophage polarization and tumor progression, suggesting its potential as a modulator of the tumor microenvironment and a therapeutic for cancer treatment.

The carcinogenic effects of benzidine (BZ) on bladder cancer are well documented, but its potential for promoting upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. The ability of emodin, a natural pharmaceutical compound, to prevent BZ‑associated UTUC has not been previously explored. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to reveal that BZ significantly enhanced the survival and migration of UTUC cell lines in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo experiments demonstrated that BZ promoted an increase in the size of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice. Further investigation revealed that BZ upregulated the expression of protein kinase A (PKA) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), along with downstream matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in UTUC cells. Moreover, BZ increased the levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in cell lysates. By contrast, emodin reduced the PKA and COX2 expression levels compared with the BZ‑treated group. Similarly, the in vivo experiments demonstrated that emodin significantly inhibited tumor growth in BZ‑pretreated nude mice, accompanied by reductions in the cAMP, PGE2, MMP9 and VEGF levels. These findings elucidated the role of BZ in promoting UTUC progression. Additionally, emodin has emerged as a novel inhibitor of BZ‑induced UTUC development through PKA/COX2 inhibition, suggesting its potential as a natural therapeutic agent against BZ‑associated UTUC.

Global statistics indicate that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer‑related death. Protein phosphatase Mg²⁺/Mn²⁺ dependent 1G (PPM1G, also termed PP2Cγ) is one of the 17 members of the PPM family. The enzymatic activity of PPM1G is highly reliant on Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺ and serves as a dephosphorylation regulator for numerous key proteins. PPM1G, functioning as a phosphatase, is involved in a number of significant biological processes such as the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression, DNA damage response, cell cycle and apoptosis, cell migration ability, cell survival and embryonic nervous system development. Additionally, PPM1G serves a role in regulating various signaling pathways. In recent years, further research has increasingly highlighted PPM1G as an oncogene in HCC. A high expression level of PPM1G is closely associated with the occurrence, progression and poor prognosis of HCC, offering notable diagnostic and therapeutic value for this patient population. In the present review, the regulatory role of PPM1G in diverse biological processes and signaling pathway activation in eukaryotes is evaluated. Furthermore, its potential application as a biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of HCC is assessed, and future prospects for HCC treatment strategies centered on PPM1G are discussed.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer‑related death, and efficient treatments to facilitate recovery and enhance long‑term outcomes are lacking. Zinc finger proteins (ZNFs), known as the largest group of transcription factors, have gained interest for their roles in HCC by stimulating the transcription of well‑known tumor‑causing genes. However, the specific roles and molecular mechanisms of ZNF740 in HCC remain unknown. The present study performed bioinformatics analysis and RNA‑sequencing analysis of differentially expressed genes in HCC, detected ZNF740 expression levels in HCC using reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemistry, and explored the effects of ZNF740 on the progression of liver cancer in vitro and in vivo using cellular functionality assays and cell‑derived xenografts. In addition, a dual‑luciferase reporter assay was performed to analyze the binding of ZNF740 with the METTL3 promoter. Furthermore, cell functionality experiments were performed to analyze whether ZNF740 promotes the proliferation of liver cancer cells in a METTL3‑dependent manner. Bioinformatics and immunoprecipitation assays were further used to analyze the molecular mechanism of ZNF740 in liver cancer. The present study demonstrated that ZNF740 expression was upregulated in HCC. Mechanistically, overexpressed ZNF740 interacted with the methyltransferase‑like 3 (METTL3) promoter and increased METTL3 expression, leading to the stabilization of hypoxia‑inducible factor‑1A (HIF1A) mRNA in an N6‑methyladenosine/YTH N6‑methyladenosine RNA‑binding protein 1‑dependent manner. Eventually, the ZNF740/METTL3/HIF1A signaling axis may facilitate the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of liver cancer via METTL3/HIF‑1A signaling. The present findings revealed the important role of ZNF740 and suggested a potential therapeutic approach that might improve clinical therapies for liver cancer.