Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.027
Alex R. Ritter MD, Austin J. Sim MD, JD
{"title":"A NORMAL Approach to Anorectal Mucosal Melanoma","authors":"Alex R. Ritter MD, Austin J. Sim MD, JD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.027","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"120 4","pages":"Pages 928-929"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142442349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.029
Vonetta M. Williams MD, PhD, Christopher A. Barker MD
{"title":"Minimizing the Morbidity of Mucosal Melanoma With Multimodality Management","authors":"Vonetta M. Williams MD, PhD, Christopher A. Barker MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.029","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.029","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"120 4","pages":"Page 928"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142442346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.011
Indrin J Chetty, Bin Cai, Michael D Chuong, Samantha L Dawes, William A Hall, Amanda R Helms, Suzanne Kirby, Eric Laugeman, Michelle Mierzwa, Jennifer Pursley, Xenia Ray, Ergys Subashi, Lauren E Henke
Purpose: Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is the latest topic in a series of white papers published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing quality processes and patient safety. ART widens the therapeutic index by improving the precision of radiation dose to targets, allowing for dose escalation and/or minimization of dose to normal tissue. ART is performed via offline or online methods; offline ART is the process of replanning a patient's treatment plan between fractions, whereas online ART involves plan adjustment with the patient on the treatment table. This is achieved with in-room imaging capable of assessing anatomic changes and the ability to reoptimize the treatment plan rapidly during the treatment session. Although ART has occurred in its simplest forms in clinical practice for decades, recent technological developments have enabled more clinical applications of ART. With increased clinical prevalence, compressed timelines, and the associated complexity of ART, quality and safety considerations are an important focus area.
Methods: The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to provide expert consensus on key workflows and processes for ART. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale, from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters selecting "strongly agree" or "agree" indicated consensus. Content not meeting this threshold was removed or revised.
Summary: Establishing and maintaining an adaptive program requires a team-based approach, appropriately trained and credentialed specialists, significant resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A comprehensive quality assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to make sure all forms of ART are performed in a safe and effective manner. Patient safety when delivering ART is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to deliver the highest levels of quality and safety.
目的:自适应放射治疗(ART)是美国放射肿瘤学会(American Society for Radiation Oncology)针对质量流程和患者安全发布的系列白皮书中的最新主题。自适应放射治疗通过提高靶点放射剂量的精确度来扩大治疗指数,允许剂量升级和/或将正常组织所受剂量降至最低。ART 可通过离线或在线方法进行;离线 ART 是在两次分次治疗之间重新规划患者治疗计划的过程,而在线 ART 则涉及患者在治疗台上的计划调整。这是通过室内成像实现的,能够评估解剖学变化,并能在治疗过程中快速重新优化治疗方案。尽管 ART 以最简单的形式出现在临床实践中已有几十年,但最近的技术发展使 ART 的临床应用更加广泛。随着 ART 临床应用的增加、时间的压缩和相关的复杂性,质量和安全方面的考虑成为一个重要的关注领域:方法:ASTRO 召集了一个跨学科工作组,就 ART 的关键工作流程和过程达成专家共识。采用建立共识的方法提出建议,工作组成员根据李克特五点量表(从 "非常同意 "到 "非常不同意")表示同意程度。预设阈值为≥75%的评分者选择 "非常同意 "或 "同意",表示达成共识。小结:建立和维护适应性计划需要团队合作、经过适当培训和认证的专家以及大量资源、专业技术和实施时间。必须利用既定指南制定全面的质量保证计划,确保以安全有效的方式开展各种形式的抗逆转录病毒疗法。提供抗逆转录病毒疗法时的患者安全是每个人的责任,专业组织、监管机构、供应商和最终用户必须明确承诺共同努力,提供最高水平的质量和安全。
{"title":"Quality and Safety Considerations for Adaptive Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO White Paper.","authors":"Indrin J Chetty, Bin Cai, Michael D Chuong, Samantha L Dawes, William A Hall, Amanda R Helms, Suzanne Kirby, Eric Laugeman, Michelle Mierzwa, Jennifer Pursley, Xenia Ray, Ergys Subashi, Lauren E Henke","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is the latest topic in a series of white papers published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing quality processes and patient safety. ART widens the therapeutic index by improving the precision of radiation dose to targets, allowing for dose escalation and/or minimization of dose to normal tissue. ART is performed via offline or online methods; offline ART is the process of replanning a patient's treatment plan between fractions, whereas online ART involves plan adjustment with the patient on the treatment table. This is achieved with in-room imaging capable of assessing anatomic changes and the ability to reoptimize the treatment plan rapidly during the treatment session. Although ART has occurred in its simplest forms in clinical practice for decades, recent technological developments have enabled more clinical applications of ART. With increased clinical prevalence, compressed timelines, and the associated complexity of ART, quality and safety considerations are an important focus area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to provide expert consensus on key workflows and processes for ART. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale, from \"strongly agree\" to \"strongly disagree.\" A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters selecting \"strongly agree\" or \"agree\" indicated consensus. Content not meeting this threshold was removed or revised.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Establishing and maintaining an adaptive program requires a team-based approach, appropriately trained and credentialed specialists, significant resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A comprehensive quality assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to make sure all forms of ART are performed in a safe and effective manner. Patient safety when delivering ART is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to deliver the highest levels of quality and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142465360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for choroidal malignant melanoma (CMM), especially regarding the preservation of the eye and visual acuity (VA).
Methods and materials: A total of 250 patients with intraocularly localized CMM treated with CIRT between January 2003 and September 2021 were included. The dose prescription included 60 to 85 Gy/4 to 5 fr, with only 68 Gy/4 fr used from 2018 onward. The rotating gantry system with scanning beams was introduced in April 2018. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (version 5.0.). For secondary glaucoma, tumor-related visual field defects were excluded from the evaluation. For VA, 245 patients with VA ≥ light perception (LP) were followed up. Effective VA (≥20/200, Snellen equivalent), counting fingers, and LP were used as indicators.
Results: The median age was 55 (15-86) years. The T categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 16 (6.4%), 41 (16.4%), 189 (75.6%), and 4 (1.6%) patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 72.5 months, the 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 87.5% and 84.2%, respectively; the 5- and 8-year local control rates were 94.4% and 92.9%, respectively. At the last follow-up, 19 of 250 patients (7.6%) underwent enucleation, 15 caused by local recurrence and 4 caused by AEs. Secondary glaucoma grades 1, 2, and 3 to 4 were observed in 22 (8.8%), 49 (19.6%), and 5 (2.0%) of patients, respectively. At the last follow-up, ≥ effective VA, ≥ counting fingers, and ≥ LP were maintained in 80 (33%), 120 (49%), and 154 (63%) of patients, respectively. Preservation rate of ≥ LP vision at 5 and 8 years after CIRT was 65.7% and 55.3%, respectively.
Conclusions: CIRT for CMM is a promising treatment for both tumor control and preservation of the eye and VA.
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Ocular and Visual Preservation After Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Choroidal Malignant Melanoma.","authors":"Shuri Aoki, Masaru Wakatsuki, Hiroshi Tsuji, Hirokazu Makishima, Hiroaki Ikawa, Shigeru Yamada, Yuji Inoue, Hiroshi Goto, Shigenobu Suzuki, Toshinobu Kubota, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Atsushi Mizota","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for choroidal malignant melanoma (CMM), especially regarding the preservation of the eye and visual acuity (VA).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A total of 250 patients with intraocularly localized CMM treated with CIRT between January 2003 and September 2021 were included. The dose prescription included 60 to 85 Gy/4 to 5 fr, with only 68 Gy/4 fr used from 2018 onward. The rotating gantry system with scanning beams was introduced in April 2018. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (version 5.0.). For secondary glaucoma, tumor-related visual field defects were excluded from the evaluation. For VA, 245 patients with VA ≥ light perception (LP) were followed up. Effective VA (≥20/200, Snellen equivalent), counting fingers, and LP were used as indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 55 (15-86) years. The T categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 16 (6.4%), 41 (16.4%), 189 (75.6%), and 4 (1.6%) patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 72.5 months, the 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 87.5% and 84.2%, respectively; the 5- and 8-year local control rates were 94.4% and 92.9%, respectively. At the last follow-up, 19 of 250 patients (7.6%) underwent enucleation, 15 caused by local recurrence and 4 caused by AEs. Secondary glaucoma grades 1, 2, and 3 to 4 were observed in 22 (8.8%), 49 (19.6%), and 5 (2.0%) of patients, respectively. At the last follow-up, ≥ effective VA, ≥ counting fingers, and ≥ LP were maintained in 80 (33%), 120 (49%), and 154 (63%) of patients, respectively. Preservation rate of ≥ LP vision at 5 and 8 years after CIRT was 65.7% and 55.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CIRT for CMM is a promising treatment for both tumor control and preservation of the eye and VA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142465358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.009
Biqi Chen MD, Mian Xi MD, Qiaoqiao Li MD, Baoqing Chen MD
{"title":"In Reply to Noguchi et al","authors":"Biqi Chen MD, Mian Xi MD, Qiaoqiao Li MD, Baoqing Chen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"120 4","pages":"Pages 1194-1195"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142442327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}