首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of Clinical Target Volume Utilization on Outcomes in Patients with Non-Spine Bone Oligometastases Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy 临床靶体积利用率对接受立体定向消融放射治疗的非脊柱骨寡转移灶患者疗效的影响
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.032
<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Despite advancements in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for non-spine bone metastases (NSBMs), uncertainty remains surrounding target volumes. While expert consensus guidelines recommend a clinical target volume (CTV), patterns of failure analyses are lacking, and larger treatment volumes may be associated with higher toxicity. This study aims to compare local failure, marginal failure, and toxicity in NSBMs treated with versus without a CTV in a population-based cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted on all patients in British Columbia treated with SABR for NSBMs on the single-arm phase II SABR-5 trial (November 2016 – July 2020) and on the BC Oligometastases Registry (August 2020 - October 2022). Use of a CTV was optional for both SABR-5 and the Registry. NSBMs were stratified based on CTV use for treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 158 patients (113 on SABR-5 and 45 on Registry) with 200 NSBMs were included. One hundred fifty-nine (80%) NSBMs were treated with a CTV and 41 (21%) without a CTV. The most common histologies were prostate (60%), breast (17%) and lung cancer (6%), and lesions received 35 Gy in 5 fractions (81%) or 24 Gy in 2 fractions (14%). Rib (34%) and pelvis (47%) were the most common lesion sites. Groups with vs without a CTV did not differ in baseline patient or tumor characteristics. After a median follow-up time of 33.7 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 19.5-48.9), local failure rates did not differ, with 2-year local failure 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.4 – 14.2) in lesions treated with a CTV and 7.6% (95% CI = 0 – 15.8) without a CTV (<em>P</em> = 0.39). Marginal failure, defined as disease recurrence outside of the GTV but within 1 cm of the PTV, occurred in 15 (8%) of lesions and 2-year cumulative incidence did not differ between groups (6.2% [95% CI = 2.3 – 10.1] and 2.6%, [95% CI = 0 – 7.5], respectively [<em>P</em> = 0.16]). Overall survival (OS) was also similar (2-year OS = 84.6%, 95% CI = 78.1 – 91.1, and 90.3%, 95% CI = 79.9 – 100, respectively; <em>P</em> = 0.64). The most common grade ≥ 2 toxicities were pain (<em>n</em> = 18, 9%) and fracture (<em>n</em> = 8, 4%). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. The 2-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 toxicity did not differ between groups (14.9%, 95% CI = 3.9-25.9 and 15.6%, 95% CI = 9.9-21.3, respectively; <em>P</em> = 0.78). Due to low number of events, local and marginal failure events were collated for a multivariable regression analysis. On multivariable regression, use of a CTV was not associated with the risk of local-marginal failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.41, 95% CI = 0.81 – 7.18, <em>P</em> = 0.11). Extraosseous extension (HR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.07-6.38, <em>P</em> = 0.035) and lack of receipt of systemic therapy (HR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.40-6.67, <em>P</em> = 0.005) were associated with higher risk.</div></div><di
目的/目标尽管立体定向消融放射治疗(SABR)在治疗非脊柱骨转移瘤(NSBMs)方面取得了进展,但围绕靶体积的不确定性依然存在。虽然专家共识指南推荐临床靶体积(CTV),但缺乏失败模式分析,而且较大的治疗体积可能与较高的毒性有关。本研究旨在比较在基于人群的队列中使用与不使用 CTV 治疗 NSBM 的局部失败、边缘失败和毒性。材料/方法对不列颠哥伦比亚省在单臂 II 期 SABR-5 试验(2016 年 11 月至 2020 年 7 月)和不列颠哥伦比亚省寡转移瘤登记(2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 10 月)中使用 SABR 治疗 NSBM 的所有患者进行了回顾性审查。SABR-5和登记处均可选择使用CTV。结果 共纳入 158 例患者(SABR-5 中 113 例,登记处中 45 例)和 200 例 NSBM。159例(80%)NSBM使用CTV治疗,41例(21%)未使用CTV治疗。最常见的组织类型是前列腺癌(60%)、乳腺癌(17%)和肺癌(6%),病变部位接受了 35 Gy 5 次分次治疗(81%)或 24 Gy 2 次分次治疗(14%)。肋骨(34%)和骨盆(47%)是最常见的病变部位。有CTV和无CTV组患者的基线特征和肿瘤特征没有差异。中位随访时间为33.7个月(四分位间距[IQR] = 19.5-48.9)后,局部失败率没有差异,使用CTV治疗的病灶2年局部失败率为9.3%(95%置信区间[CI] = 4.4 - 14.2),未使用CTV的病灶2年局部失败率为7.6%(95%置信区间[CI] = 0 - 15.8)(P = 0.39)。15例(8%)病变出现了边缘失败,边缘失败的定义是疾病复发在GTV以外但在PTV 1厘米以内,2年累积发生率在两组之间没有差异(分别为6.2% [95% CI = 2.3 - 10.1] 和 2.6% [95% CI = 0 - 7.5] [P = 0.16])。总生存期(OS)也相似(2 年 OS = 84.6%,95% CI = 78.1 - 91.1;90.3%,95% CI = 79.9 - 100;P = 0.64)。最常见的≥2级毒性反应是疼痛(18例,9%)和骨折(8例,4%)。没有 4 级或 5 级毒性反应。两组≥2级毒性的2年累积发生率无差异(分别为14.9%,95% CI = 3.9-25.9和15.6%,95% CI = 9.9-21.3;P = 0.78)。由于事件数量较少,对局部和边缘失败事件进行了整理,以进行多变量回归分析。多变量回归结果显示,使用 CTV 与局部边缘失败的风险无关(危险比 [HR] = 2.41,95% CI = 0.81 - 7.18,P = 0.11)。骨外扩展(HR = 2.62,95% CI = 1.07-6.38,P = 0.035)和未接受系统治疗(HR = 3.03,95% CI = 1.40-6.67,P = 0.005)与较高风险相关。结论CTV的使用与局部或边缘失败或毒性无关,骨外扩展和未接受系统治疗与局部边缘失败的风险较高有关。这可能有助于为这一患者群体未来的治疗计划提供参考。
{"title":"Impact of Clinical Target Volume Utilization on Outcomes in Patients with Non-Spine Bone Oligometastases Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.032","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose/Objective(s)&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Despite advancements in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for non-spine bone metastases (NSBMs), uncertainty remains surrounding target volumes. While expert consensus guidelines recommend a clinical target volume (CTV), patterns of failure analyses are lacking, and larger treatment volumes may be associated with higher toxicity. This study aims to compare local failure, marginal failure, and toxicity in NSBMs treated with versus without a CTV in a population-based cohort.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials/Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A retrospective review was conducted on all patients in British Columbia treated with SABR for NSBMs on the single-arm phase II SABR-5 trial (November 2016 – July 2020) and on the BC Oligometastases Registry (August 2020 - October 2022). Use of a CTV was optional for both SABR-5 and the Registry. NSBMs were stratified based on CTV use for treatment planning.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A total of 158 patients (113 on SABR-5 and 45 on Registry) with 200 NSBMs were included. One hundred fifty-nine (80%) NSBMs were treated with a CTV and 41 (21%) without a CTV. The most common histologies were prostate (60%), breast (17%) and lung cancer (6%), and lesions received 35 Gy in 5 fractions (81%) or 24 Gy in 2 fractions (14%). Rib (34%) and pelvis (47%) were the most common lesion sites. Groups with vs without a CTV did not differ in baseline patient or tumor characteristics. After a median follow-up time of 33.7 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 19.5-48.9), local failure rates did not differ, with 2-year local failure 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.4 – 14.2) in lesions treated with a CTV and 7.6% (95% CI = 0 – 15.8) without a CTV (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.39). Marginal failure, defined as disease recurrence outside of the GTV but within 1 cm of the PTV, occurred in 15 (8%) of lesions and 2-year cumulative incidence did not differ between groups (6.2% [95% CI = 2.3 – 10.1] and 2.6%, [95% CI = 0 – 7.5], respectively [&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.16]). Overall survival (OS) was also similar (2-year OS = 84.6%, 95% CI = 78.1 – 91.1, and 90.3%, 95% CI = 79.9 – 100, respectively; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.64). The most common grade ≥ 2 toxicities were pain (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 18, 9%) and fracture (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 8, 4%). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. The 2-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 toxicity did not differ between groups (14.9%, 95% CI = 3.9-25.9 and 15.6%, 95% CI = 9.9-21.3, respectively; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.78). Due to low number of events, local and marginal failure events were collated for a multivariable regression analysis. On multivariable regression, use of a CTV was not associated with the risk of local-marginal failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.41, 95% CI = 0.81 – 7.18, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.11). Extraosseous extension (HR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.07-6.38, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.035) and lack of receipt of systemic therapy (HR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.40-6.67, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.005) were associated with higher risk.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;di","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142358653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes and Immune Responses from INNATE: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Sotigalimab Immunotherapy during Neoadjuvant Therapy of Rectal Cancer INNATE:直肠癌新辅助治疗期间索替加利单抗免疫疗法随机II期试验的结果和免疫反应
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.019
<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Immunotherapy benefit has yet to show benefit in unselected colorectal cancer. The addition of a CD40 agonist, sotigalimab (Sotiga), to short course radiotherapy (SCRT) and FOLFOX chemotherapy (CT) is hypothesized to improve pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>INNATE (NCT04130854) is a multi-institutional Phase II randomized trial for patients with Stage III or high-risk Stage II LARD. Patients were randomized 3:2 to receive daily SCRT (5 Gy x 5) and 6 cycles of FOLFOX ± 6 infusions of Sotiga, followed by total mesorectal excision stratified by stage. Tumor tissue was collected including pre- and post-SCRT for single cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence. Target accrual was 58 patients with the primary pCR endpoint powered for a 22% difference.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 7/30/20 to 6/23/22, 30 patients were enrolled by 4 centers (19 randomized to Sotiga), after which accrual was held. Patients had unfavorable disease: all were T3/4, 20 (67%) had N2 disease and 21 (70%) had tumor involving or threatening the mesorectal fascia. Of 26 patients that underwent TME, pCR was achieved in 4/18 (22.2%) in the study arm and 1/7 (14.3%) in the control arm. Major response of pCR, near CR, or sustained 12-month clinical CR occurred in 7/19 (36.8%) in the study arm and 6/10 (60%) control arm patients. Average radiology contoured tumor volumes pre- and post-treatment were respectively: 52.2 cc (SD = 34.39) and 11.05 cc (-78.82%) in the study arm, and 36.46 cc (SD = 29.34) 16.77 cc (-54.00 %) in control arm. Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 5 (26%) study arm patients and 5 (45%) control arm patients. The most common toxicities were Grade 3 GI related (n=7), infection (n=5), and thromboembolism (n=2). Other toxicities included abdominal pain, rectal fistula, radiation proctitis, and perforation (n=1ea). The study arm had 1 Grade 4 (unrelated) postoperative stercoral perforation, and the control arm had a Grade 5 sepsis and cardiac arrest after perforation during CT. Comparisons pre-post SCRT revealed significant increases in infiltration of antigen-presenting cells in both arms (FDR < 0.05). Higher anti-tumor M1 macrophage signature after SCRT (p = 0.01) was more pronounced with SCRT+Sotiga (p = 5.74e-08). Type 1 dendritic cell activation and antigen presentation pathways and CD40 signaling were significantly increased after SCRT and SCRT+Sotiga. Anti-tumor effects extended to T cells, with increased cytotoxic activity in CD8 T cells (IL-2, GZMB, GZMK, NKG7) and NK cells (PRF1, GZMB). Expression of immune checkpoints shifted in each arm suggesting additional targets for combination therapy with SCRT or Sotiga.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adding Sotiga to SCRT and CT in LARC appears to be safe and shows robust responses to unfavorable disease, with evidence of increased antitumor adaptive immune
目的/目标:免疫疗法对非选择性结直肠癌的疗效尚未显现。材料/方法INNATE(NCT04130854)是一项针对III期或高危II期LARD患者的多机构II期随机试验。患者以3:2的比例随机接受每日SCRT(5 Gy x 5)和6个周期的FOLFOX治疗以及6次索替加输注,然后按分期进行全直肠系膜切除术。收集肿瘤组织,包括SCRT前后的组织,用于单细胞RNA测序和多重免疫荧光。结果从 20 年 7 月 30 日到 22 年 6 月 23 日,4 个中心共招募了 30 名患者(19 名患者随机接受 Sotiga 治疗),之后招募工作暂停。患者病情不乐观:所有患者均为 T3/4,20 例(67%)为 N2 病变,21 例(70%)肿瘤累及或威胁到直肠系膜筋膜。在接受 TME 的 26 名患者中,研究组有 4/18(22.2%)人获得了 pCR,对照组有 1/7(14.3%)人获得了 pCR。7/19(36.8%)名研究组患者和 6/10(60%)名对照组患者获得了 pCR、接近 CR 或持续 12 个月临床 CR 的主要反应。治疗前和治疗后的平均放射轮廓肿瘤体积分别为研究组为 52.2 毫升(标度 = 34.39)和 11.05 毫升(-78.82%),对照组为 36.46 毫升(标度 = 29.34)和 16.77 毫升(-54.00%)。5名研究组患者(26%)和5名对照组患者(45%)出现了3-4级毒性反应。最常见的毒性反应为3级消化道相关反应(7例)、感染(5例)和血栓栓塞(2例)。其他毒性反应包括腹痛、直肠瘘、放射性直肠炎和穿孔(n=1ea)。研究组有1例4级(无关)术后口腔穿孔,对照组有1例5级败血症和CT期间穿孔后心脏骤停。SCRT 术前术后比较显示,两组抗原递呈细胞浸润均显著增加(FDR < 0.05)。SCRT(P = 0.01)后抗肿瘤 M1 巨噬细胞特征较高,SCRT+Sotiga(P = 5.74e-08)更明显。SCRT和SCRT+Sotiga后,1型树突状细胞活化和抗原递呈途径以及CD40信号传导显著增加。抗肿瘤效应延伸至 T 细胞,CD8 T 细胞(IL-2、GZMB、GZMK、NKG7)和 NK 细胞(PRF1、GZMB)的细胞毒活性增加。结论:在LARC的SCRT和CT中加入索替加似乎是安全的,并能对不利疾病产生强有力的反应,与单用SCRT相比,有证据表明抗肿瘤适应性免疫反应增强。疾病控制结果待定。
{"title":"Outcomes and Immune Responses from INNATE: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Sotigalimab Immunotherapy during Neoadjuvant Therapy of Rectal Cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.019","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose/Objective(s)&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Immunotherapy benefit has yet to show benefit in unselected colorectal cancer. The addition of a CD40 agonist, sotigalimab (Sotiga), to short course radiotherapy (SCRT) and FOLFOX chemotherapy (CT) is hypothesized to improve pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials/Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;INNATE (NCT04130854) is a multi-institutional Phase II randomized trial for patients with Stage III or high-risk Stage II LARD. Patients were randomized 3:2 to receive daily SCRT (5 Gy x 5) and 6 cycles of FOLFOX ± 6 infusions of Sotiga, followed by total mesorectal excision stratified by stage. Tumor tissue was collected including pre- and post-SCRT for single cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence. Target accrual was 58 patients with the primary pCR endpoint powered for a 22% difference.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;From 7/30/20 to 6/23/22, 30 patients were enrolled by 4 centers (19 randomized to Sotiga), after which accrual was held. Patients had unfavorable disease: all were T3/4, 20 (67%) had N2 disease and 21 (70%) had tumor involving or threatening the mesorectal fascia. Of 26 patients that underwent TME, pCR was achieved in 4/18 (22.2%) in the study arm and 1/7 (14.3%) in the control arm. Major response of pCR, near CR, or sustained 12-month clinical CR occurred in 7/19 (36.8%) in the study arm and 6/10 (60%) control arm patients. Average radiology contoured tumor volumes pre- and post-treatment were respectively: 52.2 cc (SD = 34.39) and 11.05 cc (-78.82%) in the study arm, and 36.46 cc (SD = 29.34) 16.77 cc (-54.00 %) in control arm. Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 5 (26%) study arm patients and 5 (45%) control arm patients. The most common toxicities were Grade 3 GI related (n=7), infection (n=5), and thromboembolism (n=2). Other toxicities included abdominal pain, rectal fistula, radiation proctitis, and perforation (n=1ea). The study arm had 1 Grade 4 (unrelated) postoperative stercoral perforation, and the control arm had a Grade 5 sepsis and cardiac arrest after perforation during CT. Comparisons pre-post SCRT revealed significant increases in infiltration of antigen-presenting cells in both arms (FDR &lt; 0.05). Higher anti-tumor M1 macrophage signature after SCRT (p = 0.01) was more pronounced with SCRT+Sotiga (p = 5.74e-08). Type 1 dendritic cell activation and antigen presentation pathways and CD40 signaling were significantly increased after SCRT and SCRT+Sotiga. Anti-tumor effects extended to T cells, with increased cytotoxic activity in CD8 T cells (IL-2, GZMB, GZMK, NKG7) and NK cells (PRF1, GZMB). Expression of immune checkpoints shifted in each arm suggesting additional targets for combination therapy with SCRT or Sotiga.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Adding Sotiga to SCRT and CT in LARC appears to be safe and shows robust responses to unfavorable disease, with evidence of increased antitumor adaptive immune ","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142358704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal CT Feature-Based Model for Predicting Local Recurrence Free Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Chemoradiotherapy: A Multicenter Study 基于纵向 CT 特征的食管癌患者局部无复发生存期预测模型:一项多中心研究
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.065
<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Accurate prediction of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) remains a great challenge for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, the integration of longitudinal data holds significant potential for improving predictive capabilities. This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning model that incorporates longitudinal CT scans to accurately predict LRFS in patients with ESCC following dCRT.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively collected 321 ESCC patients who underwent dCRT at our hospital and randomly divided them into training set (224) and internal validation set (91). Additionally, 202 patients from three other cancer hospitals were divided into two external validation sets (111 and 91 patients). The patients’ computed tomography (CT) images before and after dCRT were utilized. LRFS-related intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features were extracted and selected through LASSO-Cox. Subsequently, we developed a correlation-driven disentanglement survival network (CDDSN), which integrated a ResNet block, base transformer, and basic CNN to effectively fuse shared and unique deep features from longitudinal CT images. The selected radiomic and deep features were then integrated to establish the final CDDSN model, the performance of which was validated using external sets. Furthermore, we developed a multimodal nomogram using independent clinical factors and the CDDSN signature in the training set, which was subsequently tested in three validation sets.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to the models utilizing CT images acquired before or after dCRT, the CDDSN model based on longitudinal CT scans achieved the highest performance in LRFS predictive with the C-index of 0.796 (95% CI = 0.741-0.851), 0.738 (95% CI = 0.675-0.801), 0.712 (95% CI = 0.661-0.758) and 0.708 (95% CI = 0.657-0.748) in the training set, internal testing set and the two external validation sets, respectively. Moreover, the CDDSN model integrating both intratumoral and peritumoral features outperformed the model solely using intratumoral features in each dataset. Additionally, our CDDSN model demonstrated superior fusion and predictive power in LRFS compared to the early fusion and late fusion methods in the two external validation sets (C-index: 0.712 vs 0.690 vs 0.681; 0.708 vs 0.661 vs 0.684), respectively. Furthermore, multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that age, T stage, and absolute lymphocyte count were significantly correlated with LRFS (P<0.05). The multimodal nomogram, incorporating clinical factors and the CDDSN signature, exhibited a favorable predictive power for LRFS with a C-index of 0.826 in the training set and 0.709-0.734 in the validation sets.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CDDSN model, utilizing longitudinal CT images, can enhance the predictive power for LRFS in patients with ES
目的/目标:对于接受确定性化放疗(dCRT)的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者来说,准确预测无局部复发生存期(LRFS)仍然是一项巨大的挑战。然而,整合纵向数据在提高预测能力方面具有巨大潜力。本研究旨在开发和验证一种深度学习模型,该模型结合了纵向CT扫描,可准确预测接受dCRT治疗的ESCC患者的LRFS.材料/方法我们回顾性地收集了321例在本院接受dCRT治疗的ESCC患者,并将其随机分为训练集(224例)和内部验证集(91例)。此外,我们还将其他三家肿瘤医院的 202 名患者分为两个外部验证集(111 名和 91 名)。利用患者在 dCRT 前后的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像。通过 LASSO-Cox 提取并选择了与 LRFS 相关的瘤内和瘤周放射学特征。随后,我们开发了一种相关性驱动的解脱生存网络(CDDSN),该网络集成了 ResNet 块、基变换器和基本 CNN,可有效融合纵向 CT 图像中的共享和独特深度特征。然后将选定的放射学特征和深度特征进行整合,建立了最终的 CDDSN 模型,并利用外部数据集对其性能进行了验证。此外,我们还在训练集中使用独立的临床因素和 CDDSN 特征开发了一个多模态提名图,随后在三个验证集中对其进行了测试。在训练集、内部测试集和两个外部验证集中,C 指数分别为 0.796(95% CI = 0.741-0.851)、0.738(95% CI = 0.675-0.801)、0.712(95% CI = 0.661-0.758)和 0.708(95% CI = 0.657-0.748)。此外,在每个数据集中,整合了瘤内和瘤周特征的 CDDSN 模型的表现均优于仅使用瘤内特征的模型。此外,在两个外部验证集中,与早期融合和晚期融合方法相比,我们的 CDDSN 模型在 LRFS 方面表现出更高的融合和预测能力(C 指数:分别为 0.712 vs 0.690 vs 0.681;0.708 vs 0.661 vs 0.684)。此外,多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,年龄、T 分期和淋巴细胞绝对计数与 LRFS 显著相关(P<0.05)。结合临床因素和 CDDSN 特征的多模态提名图对 LRFS 具有良好的预测能力,训练集的 C 指数为 0.826,验证集的 C 指数为 0.709-0.734。基于 CDDSN 的提名图为 ESCC 的个体化治疗决策提供了一种很有前景的方法。
{"title":"Longitudinal CT Feature-Based Model for Predicting Local Recurrence Free Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Chemoradiotherapy: A Multicenter Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.065","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.065","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose/Objective(s)&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Accurate prediction of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) remains a great challenge for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, the integration of longitudinal data holds significant potential for improving predictive capabilities. This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning model that incorporates longitudinal CT scans to accurately predict LRFS in patients with ESCC following dCRT.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials/Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We retrospectively collected 321 ESCC patients who underwent dCRT at our hospital and randomly divided them into training set (224) and internal validation set (91). Additionally, 202 patients from three other cancer hospitals were divided into two external validation sets (111 and 91 patients). The patients’ computed tomography (CT) images before and after dCRT were utilized. LRFS-related intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features were extracted and selected through LASSO-Cox. Subsequently, we developed a correlation-driven disentanglement survival network (CDDSN), which integrated a ResNet block, base transformer, and basic CNN to effectively fuse shared and unique deep features from longitudinal CT images. The selected radiomic and deep features were then integrated to establish the final CDDSN model, the performance of which was validated using external sets. Furthermore, we developed a multimodal nomogram using independent clinical factors and the CDDSN signature in the training set, which was subsequently tested in three validation sets.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Compared to the models utilizing CT images acquired before or after dCRT, the CDDSN model based on longitudinal CT scans achieved the highest performance in LRFS predictive with the C-index of 0.796 (95% CI = 0.741-0.851), 0.738 (95% CI = 0.675-0.801), 0.712 (95% CI = 0.661-0.758) and 0.708 (95% CI = 0.657-0.748) in the training set, internal testing set and the two external validation sets, respectively. Moreover, the CDDSN model integrating both intratumoral and peritumoral features outperformed the model solely using intratumoral features in each dataset. Additionally, our CDDSN model demonstrated superior fusion and predictive power in LRFS compared to the early fusion and late fusion methods in the two external validation sets (C-index: 0.712 vs 0.690 vs 0.681; 0.708 vs 0.661 vs 0.684), respectively. Furthermore, multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that age, T stage, and absolute lymphocyte count were significantly correlated with LRFS (P&lt;0.05). The multimodal nomogram, incorporating clinical factors and the CDDSN signature, exhibited a favorable predictive power for LRFS with a C-index of 0.826 in the training set and 0.709-0.734 in the validation sets.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The CDDSN model, utilizing longitudinal CT images, can enhance the predictive power for LRFS in patients with ES","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long Term Rates of Lymphedema in Hypofractionated Nodal Regional Irradiation for Women with Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial – “HeNRIetta” 乳腺癌女性患者接受低分流结节区域放疗后的长期淋巴水肿率:2期临床试验--"HeNRIetta"
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.008
<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Moderate hypofractionation in the management of localized breast cancer is considered standard of care. Data suggests its use in the setting of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) yields equivalent oncologic and cosmetic outcomes but has not yet achieved universal acceptance into practice. The risk of lymphedema (LA) has not been the focus of study in this setting and therefore, we sought to evaluate the risk and establish the rate of moderate or marked LA for patients treated with hypofractionated RNI utilizing an established and commonly used hypofractionation treatment scheme with standardized treatment volumes for patients with node-positive breast cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Women with node positive breast cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection were eligible for enrollment. Breast surgery may have been lumpectomy (Lp), mastectomy without reconstruction (M-R), or mastectomy with reconstruction (M+R). Nodal staging by sentinel lymph node (SLN) or by axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection were included. Patients could undergo neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Breast and RNI was administered to 42.56 Gy in 16 daily fractions. The dissected axilla was excluded as a target volume in patients who underwent ALN dissection. Primary endpoint was rate of LA at 3 years following RNI for two cohorts, SLN (cohort A) and ALN (cohort B). Lymphedema was defined as ≥ 10% increase in arm circumference over baseline circumference as compared to the contralateral arm measured every 6 months for the first 3 years. Per protocol-defined to declare moderate hypofractionation non-inferior to recent historical controls cohorts A and B rate of lymphedema were estimated to be 6% and 10% respectively, a non-inferiority margin of +/- 7% was used. Secondary objectives included 5-year oncologic outcomes, grade 3 or higher toxicities, cosmesis and patient reported outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between September 2015 and July 2021, a total of 134 women were enrolled, 84 underwent SLN only and 50 completed ALN dissection. Mean age was 58.1 years for cohort A and 62.5 years for cohort B. Lp, M+R, and M-R was performed in 58.2%, 19.4, and 30% respectively. LA was observed in 11 patients (13.1%) with SLN only (<em>P</em> = 0.5897) and 9 patients (18%) who underwent ALN dissection (<em>P</em> = 0.65971). Only 2 patients developed grade 2 LA (limiting instrumental activities of daily living) and no grade 3 (limiting self-care activities of daily living) was observed. At 36 month follow up 85.5% in the lumpectomy group and 75.9% in the mastectomy with reconstruction group had excellent or good cosmesis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Moderate hypofractionation did not meet the criteria defined by the protocol for non-inferiority. However, the absolute rates of LA remain low and predominantly grade 1. Cosmetic outcomes in this adv
目的/目标在治疗局部乳腺癌时,适度低分次照射被认为是标准的治疗方法。有数据表明,在区域结节照射(RNI)的情况下使用该方法可获得同等的肿瘤和美容效果,但尚未被普遍接受。在这种情况下,淋巴水肿(LA)的风险并不是研究的重点,因此,我们试图评估淋巴水肿(LA)的风险,并确定结节阳性乳腺癌患者接受低分次 RNI 治疗的中度或明显 LA 的发生率。乳房手术可能是肿块切除术(Lp)、无重建乳房的乳房切除术(M-R)或重建乳房的乳房切除术(M+R)。包括通过前哨淋巴结(SLN)或腋窝淋巴结(ALN)清扫进行结节分期。患者可以接受新辅助化疗或辅助化疗,由肿瘤内科医生决定。乳腺和RNI的剂量为42.56 Gy,每天16次。接受ALN切除术的患者,切除的腋窝不作为靶区。主要终点是SLN(A组)和ALN(B组)两组患者RNI术后3年的LA发生率。淋巴水肿的定义是:在最初 3 年中,每 6 个月测量一次手臂周长,与基线周长相比,手臂周长比对侧手臂周长增加≥10%。根据方案定义,中度低分切法的淋巴水肿率估计分别为6%和10%,因此采用+/- 7%的非劣效边际,宣布中度低分切法不劣于最近的历史对照组A和B。次要目标包括5年肿瘤学结果、3级或更高毒性、外观和患者报告结果。结果2015年9月至2021年7月期间,共有134名妇女入组,其中84人仅接受了SLN,50人完成了ALN解剖。58.2%、19.4%和30%的患者接受了Lp、M+R和M-R手术。11名仅接受SLN治疗的患者(13.1%)观察到LA(P=0.5897),9名接受ALN切除术的患者(18%)观察到LA(P=0.65971)。只有 2 名患者出现 2 级 LA(日常生活工具活动受限),没有发现 3 级 LA(日常生活自理活动受限)。在36个月的随访中,肿块切除术组85.5%的患者和乳房切除与重建术组75.9%的患者的外观极佳或良好。然而,LA的绝对比率仍然很低,而且主要是1级。这一晚期患者群体的美容效果良好。这些数据似乎并不支持这样的观点,即LA的风险是避免进行中度低分次区域结节照射的理由。
{"title":"Long Term Rates of Lymphedema in Hypofractionated Nodal Regional Irradiation for Women with Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial – “HeNRIetta”","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.008","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose/Objective(s)&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Moderate hypofractionation in the management of localized breast cancer is considered standard of care. Data suggests its use in the setting of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) yields equivalent oncologic and cosmetic outcomes but has not yet achieved universal acceptance into practice. The risk of lymphedema (LA) has not been the focus of study in this setting and therefore, we sought to evaluate the risk and establish the rate of moderate or marked LA for patients treated with hypofractionated RNI utilizing an established and commonly used hypofractionation treatment scheme with standardized treatment volumes for patients with node-positive breast cancer.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials/Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Women with node positive breast cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection were eligible for enrollment. Breast surgery may have been lumpectomy (Lp), mastectomy without reconstruction (M-R), or mastectomy with reconstruction (M+R). Nodal staging by sentinel lymph node (SLN) or by axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection were included. Patients could undergo neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Breast and RNI was administered to 42.56 Gy in 16 daily fractions. The dissected axilla was excluded as a target volume in patients who underwent ALN dissection. Primary endpoint was rate of LA at 3 years following RNI for two cohorts, SLN (cohort A) and ALN (cohort B). Lymphedema was defined as ≥ 10% increase in arm circumference over baseline circumference as compared to the contralateral arm measured every 6 months for the first 3 years. Per protocol-defined to declare moderate hypofractionation non-inferior to recent historical controls cohorts A and B rate of lymphedema were estimated to be 6% and 10% respectively, a non-inferiority margin of +/- 7% was used. Secondary objectives included 5-year oncologic outcomes, grade 3 or higher toxicities, cosmesis and patient reported outcomes.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Between September 2015 and July 2021, a total of 134 women were enrolled, 84 underwent SLN only and 50 completed ALN dissection. Mean age was 58.1 years for cohort A and 62.5 years for cohort B. Lp, M+R, and M-R was performed in 58.2%, 19.4, and 30% respectively. LA was observed in 11 patients (13.1%) with SLN only (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.5897) and 9 patients (18%) who underwent ALN dissection (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.65971). Only 2 patients developed grade 2 LA (limiting instrumental activities of daily living) and no grade 3 (limiting self-care activities of daily living) was observed. At 36 month follow up 85.5% in the lumpectomy group and 75.9% in the mastectomy with reconstruction group had excellent or good cosmesis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Moderate hypofractionation did not meet the criteria defined by the protocol for non-inferiority. However, the absolute rates of LA remain low and predominantly grade 1. Cosmetic outcomes in this adv","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceleration of Overall Treatment Time by Mono-Application Multifractionated Brachytherapy over 48 Hours vs. Sequential Weekly Application Brachytherapy in Carcinoma Cervix – Multi-Institutional, Subcontinent Based Real World Non-Inferiority Study 在宫颈癌治疗中,48 小时单次应用多点近距离放射治疗与每周连续应用近距离放射治疗相比,可加快总体治疗时间--基于次大陆的多机构非劣效性真实世界研究
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.015
<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Standard practice entails employing multifractionated high-dose-rate (HDR) BT, administered in 3 to 4 sessions over 3 weeks post Chemoradiation, keeping overall treatment time < 56 days. Mono-application fractionated brachytherapy accelerates the treatment timeline without escalating acute or late toxicities. Recent progress in image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer facilitates the attainment of optimal dose volume parameters for both the target and organs at risk. This is the first multinational, multi-institutional study comparing outcomes and toxicity of mono-application fractionated brachytherapy versus multiple-application brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Enrolled 401 eligible patients with confirmed cervical cancer, FIGO stages IIA-IVA, intended definitive chemoradiation. Patients post 45-50 Gy external radiation with cisplatin either received mono-application fractionated brachytherapy or multiple-application for interstitial or intracavitary BT. Rectal and bladder doses were strictly maintained within 50% of prescription dose with adequate dosing to high-risk target volume. Demographic data, stage, histology, external radiation dose, brachytherapy dose and fractionation, D2 cc doses to bladder, rectum were recorded. Disease free survival and overall survival at 3 years were obtained along with data on acute and long-term bladder and rectal toxicities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four hundred one patients, 203 received multiple applications spaced over 3 weeks and 198 received single application multiple deliveries < 48 hours. All patients underwent Intracavitary or Interstitial BT with most common fractionation of 7 Gyx3 or equivalent. Rectal and bladder 2 cc doses were 45% +/- 12% of prescription dose. HRCTV coverage of D90 of 95+/-7 was achieved in all cases. With a median follow up of 36 months (range = 22-37), 3 year disease-free was 0.78 and 0.76, The <em>P</em> value of 0.98 (> 0.05), showed difference in DFS between the two groups was not statistically significant. The 3-year overall survival was 0.72 and 0.71, <em>P</em> value of 0.1 (> 0.05), again statistically insignificant. Cox regression model analysis showed stage wise DFS and OS difference between the groups weren’t statistically significant, hence proving the non-inferiority. The 3 year Grade 2 or more bladder and rectal toxicity has been reported in 2.3% and 4.1% in mono application group and 2.9% and 6.3% of multi-application group, statistically insignificant, confirming the credibility of our approach.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study lays the foundation for a comprehensive investigation into the outcomes and efficacy of mono-application fractionated brachytherapy being non inferior to multiple-application with respect to outcomes and toxicity, providing valuable insights into the management of cervical cancer with reduced overall treatme
目的/目标:标准做法是在化疗后3周内分3到4次进行多分次高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗,使总治疗时间保持在56天。单次应用分次近距离放射治疗可在不增加急性或晚期毒性的情况下加快治疗时间。图像引导近距离放射治疗宫颈癌的最新进展有助于为靶点和危险器官获得最佳剂量体积参数。这是第一项跨国多机构研究,比较了宫颈癌单次应用分次近距离放射治疗与多次应用近距离放射治疗的疗效和毒性。材料/方法招募了401名符合条件的宫颈癌确诊患者,FIGO分期为IIA-IVA,打算接受明确的化疗。接受过 45-50 Gy 顺铂外照射的患者要么接受单次分次近距离放射治疗,要么接受多次间质或腔内近距离放射治疗。直肠和膀胱的剂量严格控制在处方剂量的50%以内,并对高风险靶体积进行充分剂量控制。记录了人口统计学数据、分期、组织学、外照射剂量、近距离放射治疗剂量和分次、膀胱和直肠的D2 cc剂量。结果401名患者中,203人接受了间隔3周的多次应用,198人接受了48小时内的多次单次应用。所有患者都接受了腔内或间质 BT,最常见的分次剂量为 7 Gyx3 或同等剂量。直肠和膀胱 2 cc 剂量为处方剂量的 45% +/- 12%。所有病例的 HRCTV D90 覆盖率均达到 95+/-7。中位随访时间为 36 个月(22-37 个月),3 年无病生存率分别为 0.78 和 0.76,P 值为 0.98(0.05),表明两组的无病生存率差异无统计学意义。3年总生存率分别为0.72和0.71,P值为0.1(0.05),同样无统计学意义。Cox 回归模型分析显示,两组间的分期 DFS 和 OS 差异无统计学意义,因此证明了非劣效性。单药组和多药组中分别有 2.3% 和 4.1% 和 2.9% 和 6.3% 的患者出现了 3 年 2 级或以上的膀胱和直肠毒性,在统计学上并不显著,这证实了我们的方法是可信的。结论我们的研究为全面调查单次应用分次近距离放射治疗的结果和疗效奠定了基础,在结果和毒性方面,单次应用分次近距离放射治疗并不逊色于多次应用,为宫颈癌的治疗提供了宝贵的见解,缩短了总体治疗时间,优化了资源管理。图像引导近距离放射治疗技术严格限制OARs和准确性,可将长期毒性降至最低。
{"title":"Acceleration of Overall Treatment Time by Mono-Application Multifractionated Brachytherapy over 48 Hours vs. Sequential Weekly Application Brachytherapy in Carcinoma Cervix – Multi-Institutional, Subcontinent Based Real World Non-Inferiority Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.015","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose/Objective(s)&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Standard practice entails employing multifractionated high-dose-rate (HDR) BT, administered in 3 to 4 sessions over 3 weeks post Chemoradiation, keeping overall treatment time &lt; 56 days. Mono-application fractionated brachytherapy accelerates the treatment timeline without escalating acute or late toxicities. Recent progress in image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer facilitates the attainment of optimal dose volume parameters for both the target and organs at risk. This is the first multinational, multi-institutional study comparing outcomes and toxicity of mono-application fractionated brachytherapy versus multiple-application brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials/Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Enrolled 401 eligible patients with confirmed cervical cancer, FIGO stages IIA-IVA, intended definitive chemoradiation. Patients post 45-50 Gy external radiation with cisplatin either received mono-application fractionated brachytherapy or multiple-application for interstitial or intracavitary BT. Rectal and bladder doses were strictly maintained within 50% of prescription dose with adequate dosing to high-risk target volume. Demographic data, stage, histology, external radiation dose, brachytherapy dose and fractionation, D2 cc doses to bladder, rectum were recorded. Disease free survival and overall survival at 3 years were obtained along with data on acute and long-term bladder and rectal toxicities.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Four hundred one patients, 203 received multiple applications spaced over 3 weeks and 198 received single application multiple deliveries &lt; 48 hours. All patients underwent Intracavitary or Interstitial BT with most common fractionation of 7 Gyx3 or equivalent. Rectal and bladder 2 cc doses were 45% +/- 12% of prescription dose. HRCTV coverage of D90 of 95+/-7 was achieved in all cases. With a median follow up of 36 months (range = 22-37), 3 year disease-free was 0.78 and 0.76, The &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; value of 0.98 (&gt; 0.05), showed difference in DFS between the two groups was not statistically significant. The 3-year overall survival was 0.72 and 0.71, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; value of 0.1 (&gt; 0.05), again statistically insignificant. Cox regression model analysis showed stage wise DFS and OS difference between the groups weren’t statistically significant, hence proving the non-inferiority. The 3 year Grade 2 or more bladder and rectal toxicity has been reported in 2.3% and 4.1% in mono application group and 2.9% and 6.3% of multi-application group, statistically insignificant, confirming the credibility of our approach.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Our study lays the foundation for a comprehensive investigation into the outcomes and efficacy of mono-application fractionated brachytherapy being non inferior to multiple-application with respect to outcomes and toxicity, providing valuable insights into the management of cervical cancer with reduced overall treatme","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Synergistic Potential of CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-L1 Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer CDK4/6抑制剂和放疗与抗PD-L1免疫疗法在三阴性乳腺癌中的协同潜力
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.071

Purpose/Objective(s)

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the subtype with the poorest survival outcomes among all breast cancer molecular classifications. While immunotherapy has shown promising anti-tumor effects in TNBC treatment, its efficacy is not universal across all patients. CDK4/6 inhibitors have been recognized for their ability to radiosensitize and modulate the immune system. Additionally, high-dose radiotherapy (RT) has been observed to bolster the effects of immunotherapy. This study investigates the potential of enhancing immunotherapy effectiveness in TNBC by integrating RT with CDK4/6 inhibitors, focusing on modulating the tumor microenvironment.

Materials/Methods

We employed three human TNBC cell lines—MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-453, and MDA-MB-468—along with the 4T1 mouse TNBC cell line to assess CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, in radiosensitizing effects of TNBC using the clonogenic assays. We assessed the anti-tumor efficacy of RT, abemaciclib, and anti-PD-L1 antibody combination through the 4T1 cell line-derived immunocompetent mouse model. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) levels in mouse blood were monitored before, during, and after treatment to gauge the immune response. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were analyzed in excised tumor samples through flow cytometry assays and immunohistochemical staining.

Results

Clonogenic assays showed that RT combined with abemaciclib pretreatment had synergistic effects across all tested TNBC cell lines. A single 8 Gy fraction of RT increased PD-L1 expression on the surface of tumor cells, while abemaciclib (at 100nm or 200nm concentrations) did not alter PD-L1 expression in all TNBC cell lines. The combination of abemaciclib, RT, and anti-PD-L1 in the 4T1 mouse model significantly decreased the tumor growth (P < 0.05) and elevated circulating IFN-γ levels during treatment (P < 0.001) when compared with control, RT alone, abemaciclib with anti-PD-L1, abemaciclib with RT, and anti-PD-L1 with RT. TILs assays showed the combination treatment of abemaciclib, RT, and anti PD-L1 increased CD4 and CD8 positive T cells proportion (P < 0.05 and P <0.01, respectively) as well as tumor associated macrophage (P < 0.001) when compared to the control group. Immunohistochemical staining revealed an increase in CD8 positive T cells and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 positive macrophages in the triple-combination treatment group compared to the other four groups.

Conclusion

Combined CDK4/6 inhibitors with RT enhance anti-tumor effects of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in TNBC through increasing secretion of IFN-γ and modulation of tumor microenvironments via recruiting CD4 and CD8 positive T-cells, as well as M1 type tumor associated macrophage.
目的/目标:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是所有乳腺癌分子分类中生存率最差的亚型。虽然免疫疗法在 TNBC 治疗中显示出良好的抗肿瘤效果,但其疗效并非对所有患者都适用。CDK4/6 抑制剂被认为具有放射增敏和调节免疫系统的能力。此外,据观察,大剂量放疗(RT)可增强免疫疗法的效果。材料/方法 我们采用三种人类 TNBC 细胞系--MDA-MB-231、MDA-MB-453 和 MDA-MB-468--以及 4T1 小鼠 TNBC 细胞系,使用克隆形成试验评估 CDK4/6 抑制剂阿柏西尼对 TNBC 的放射增敏作用。我们通过4T1细胞系衍生的免疫功能健全小鼠模型评估了RT、abemaciclib和抗PD-L1抗体组合的抗肿瘤疗效。在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后监测小鼠血液中的干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)水平,以评估免疫反应。通过流式细胞术检测和免疫组化染色分析了切除肿瘤样本中的肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)。结果细胞周期检测显示,RT 联合阿贝昔单抗预处理对所有测试的 TNBC 细胞系都有协同作用。单次 8 Gy 分量的 RT 可增加肿瘤细胞表面的 PD-L1 表达,而阿贝替尼(浓度为 100nm 或 200nm)不会改变所有 TNBC 细胞系中的 PD-L1 表达。在4T1小鼠模型中,与对照组、单用RT组、阿培莫司利与抗PD-L1组、阿培莫司利与RT组、抗PD-L1与RT组相比,阿培莫司利、RT和抗PD-L1组在治疗过程中能显著降低肿瘤生长(P< 0.05)和升高循环IFN-γ水平(P< 0.001)。TILs检测结果显示,与对照组相比,阿巴西利、RT和抗PD-L1联合治疗可增加CD4和CD8阳性T细胞比例(分别为P <0.05和P <0.01)以及肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(P <0.001)。免疫组化染色显示,与其他四组相比,三联治疗组 CD8 阳性 T 细胞和单核细胞趋化蛋白(MCP)-1 阳性巨噬细胞增加。
{"title":"Synergistic Potential of CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-L1 Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.071","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.071","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the subtype with the poorest survival outcomes among all breast cancer molecular classifications. While immunotherapy has shown promising anti-tumor effects in TNBC treatment, its efficacy is not universal across all patients. CDK4/6 inhibitors have been recognized for their ability to radiosensitize and modulate the immune system. Additionally, high-dose radiotherapy (RT) has been observed to bolster the effects of immunotherapy. This study investigates the potential of enhancing immunotherapy effectiveness in TNBC by integrating RT with CDK4/6 inhibitors, focusing on modulating the tumor microenvironment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>We employed three human TNBC cell lines—MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-453, and MDA-MB-468—along with the 4T1 mouse TNBC cell line to assess CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, in radiosensitizing effects of TNBC using the clonogenic assays. We assessed the anti-tumor efficacy of RT, abemaciclib, and anti-PD-L1 antibody combination through the 4T1 cell line-derived immunocompetent mouse model. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) levels in mouse blood were monitored before, during, and after treatment to gauge the immune response. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were analyzed in excised tumor samples through flow cytometry assays and immunohistochemical staining.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Clonogenic assays showed that RT combined with abemaciclib pretreatment had synergistic effects across all tested TNBC cell lines. A single 8 Gy fraction of RT increased PD-L1 expression on the surface of tumor cells, while abemaciclib (at 100nm or 200nm concentrations) did not alter PD-L1 expression in all TNBC cell lines. The combination of abemaciclib, RT, and anti-PD-L1 in the 4T1 mouse model significantly decreased the tumor growth (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and elevated circulating IFN-γ levels during treatment (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) when compared with control, RT alone, abemaciclib with anti-PD-L1, abemaciclib with RT, and anti-PD-L1 with RT. TILs assays showed the combination treatment of abemaciclib, RT, and anti PD-L1 increased CD4 and CD8 positive T cells proportion (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05 and <em>P</em> &lt;0.01, respectively) as well as tumor associated macrophage (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) when compared to the control group. Immunohistochemical staining revealed an increase in CD8 positive T cells and <em>monocyte</em> chemoattractant protein (<em>MCP</em>)-1 positive macrophages in the triple-combination treatment group compared to the other four groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combined CDK4/6 inhibitors with RT enhance anti-tumor effects of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in TNBC through increasing secretion of IFN-γ and modulation of tumor microenvironments via recruiting CD4 and CD8 positive T-cells, as well as M1 type tumor associated macrophage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel Statistical-AI Method to Automate Discovery of Predictive Factors and Thresholds for 3 Year Survival, Dysphagia and Xerostomia for Patients with Head and Neck Cancers 自动发现头颈部癌症患者 3 年生存率、吞咽困难和口腔异味预测因素和阈值的新型统计学-人工智能方法
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.062
<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Clinicians iteratively adjust treatment approaches to improve outcomes, but to date, automatable approaches for continuous learning of risk factors as these adjustments are made are lacking. We combined a large-scale, comprehensive real-world Learning Health System infrastructure (LHSI), with automated statistical profiling, visualization, and artificial intelligence (AI) approach to test evidence-based discovery of clinical factors for three endpoints: dysphagia, xerostomia, and 3-year survival for head and neck cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Records for 964 patients treated for head and neck cancers with conventional fractionation between 2017 and 2022 were used. Combined information on demographics, diagnosis and staging, social determinants of health measures, chemotherapy, radiation therapy dose volume histogram curves, treatment details, laboratory values, and outcomes from the LHSI to winnow evidence for 485 candidate features. Univariate statistical profiling was performed using bootstrap resampling to detail confidence intervals for the following thresholds and metrics: area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), F1, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), <em>P</em> values for Wilcoxon Rank Sum (WRS), Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS), and logistic fits of distributions detailed predictive evidence of individual features. Parsimonious XGBoost models were constructed with 10-fold cross validation using training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) sets. Probabilistic models utilizing statistical profiling logistic fits of distributions were used to benchmark XGBoost models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Incidence of dysphagia ≥ grade 3 within 1 year of treatment was low (11%). Xerostomia ≥ grade 2 (39% to 16%) and survival ≤ 3 years decreased (25% to 15%) over the time range. The strongest grade 2 xerostomia predictor was Glnd_Submand_Low: D15% [Gy] ≥ 45.2 with a logistic model quantifying a gradual rather than an abrupt increase in probability (13.5 + 0.18 (x-41.0 Gy)). Strongest predictive factors for lower likelihood of death by 3 years were GTV_High: Volume [cc] ≤ 21.1, GTV_Low: Volume [cc] ≤ 57.5, Baseline Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) ≤ 5.6, Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) ≤0.56, Platelet-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≤ 202.5. All predictors had WRS and KS <em>P</em> values < 0.02. Statistical profiling enabled detailing gains of XGBoost models with respect to individual features. Time period reductions in distribution of GTV volumes correlated with reductions in death by 3 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combined use of LHSI, Statistical Profiling and Artificial Intelligence provided a basis for automating evidence-based discovery. Benchmarking AI models with simple probabilistic models provided a means of understanding when results are driven by general areas of overall risk vs. more complex interactions. The method can form a new appr
目的/目标 临床医生会反复调整治疗方法以改善疗效,但迄今为止,还缺乏在进行这些调整时持续学习风险因素的自动化方法。我们将大规模、全面的真实世界学习健康系统基础设施(LHSI)与自动统计分析、可视化和人工智能(AI)方法相结合,测试基于证据发现头颈癌患者吞咽困难、口腔异物感和3年生存期这三个终点的临床因素。综合人口统计学、诊断和分期、健康社会决定因素测量、化疗、放疗剂量体积直方图曲线、治疗细节、实验室值和 LHSI 的结果等信息,筛选出 485 个候选特征的证据。使用自举重采样法进行单变量统计分析,以详细确定以下阈值和指标的置信区间:曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度(SN)、特异性(SP)、F1、诊断几率比(DOR)、Wilcoxon Rank Sum (WRS)、Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS)的P值,以及详细预测单个特征证据的Logistic拟合分布。通过使用训练集(70%)、验证集(10%)和测试集(20%)进行 10 倍交叉验证,构建了准 XGBoost 模型。结果治疗 1 年内吞咽困难≥ 3 级的发生率较低(11%)。口腔异味≥2级的发生率(39%至16%)和≤3年的存活率在时间范围内有所下降(25%至15%)。2级口腔异味的最强预测因子是Glnd_Submand_Low:D15% [Gy] ≥ 45.2,其逻辑模型量化了逐渐而非突然增加的概率(13.5 + 0.18 (x-41.0 Gy))。3年后死亡可能性降低的最强预测因素是GTV_高:体积[cc]≤21.1,GTV_低:体积[cc]≤57.5,基线中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)≤5.6,单核细胞-淋巴细胞比率(MLR)≤0.56,血小板-淋巴细胞比率(PLR)≤202.5。所有预测因子的 WRS 和 KS P 值均为 0.02。通过统计分析,可以详细了解 XGBoost 模型在单个特征方面的收益。结论LHSI、统计剖析和人工智能的结合使用为基于证据的自动发现提供了基础。将人工智能模型与简单的概率模型进行比对,可以了解哪些结果是由总体风险的一般领域驱动的,哪些是由更复杂的相互作用驱动的。这种方法可以形成一种新的方法,用于持续学习和循证开发临床试验可检验的假设和分层。
{"title":"Novel Statistical-AI Method to Automate Discovery of Predictive Factors and Thresholds for 3 Year Survival, Dysphagia and Xerostomia for Patients with Head and Neck Cancers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.062","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.062","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose/Objective(s)&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Clinicians iteratively adjust treatment approaches to improve outcomes, but to date, automatable approaches for continuous learning of risk factors as these adjustments are made are lacking. We combined a large-scale, comprehensive real-world Learning Health System infrastructure (LHSI), with automated statistical profiling, visualization, and artificial intelligence (AI) approach to test evidence-based discovery of clinical factors for three endpoints: dysphagia, xerostomia, and 3-year survival for head and neck cancer patients.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials/Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Records for 964 patients treated for head and neck cancers with conventional fractionation between 2017 and 2022 were used. Combined information on demographics, diagnosis and staging, social determinants of health measures, chemotherapy, radiation therapy dose volume histogram curves, treatment details, laboratory values, and outcomes from the LHSI to winnow evidence for 485 candidate features. Univariate statistical profiling was performed using bootstrap resampling to detail confidence intervals for the following thresholds and metrics: area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), F1, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; values for Wilcoxon Rank Sum (WRS), Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS), and logistic fits of distributions detailed predictive evidence of individual features. Parsimonious XGBoost models were constructed with 10-fold cross validation using training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) sets. Probabilistic models utilizing statistical profiling logistic fits of distributions were used to benchmark XGBoost models.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Incidence of dysphagia ≥ grade 3 within 1 year of treatment was low (11%). Xerostomia ≥ grade 2 (39% to 16%) and survival ≤ 3 years decreased (25% to 15%) over the time range. The strongest grade 2 xerostomia predictor was Glnd_Submand_Low: D15% [Gy] ≥ 45.2 with a logistic model quantifying a gradual rather than an abrupt increase in probability (13.5 + 0.18 (x-41.0 Gy)). Strongest predictive factors for lower likelihood of death by 3 years were GTV_High: Volume [cc] ≤ 21.1, GTV_Low: Volume [cc] ≤ 57.5, Baseline Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) ≤ 5.6, Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) ≤0.56, Platelet-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≤ 202.5. All predictors had WRS and KS &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; values &lt; 0.02. Statistical profiling enabled detailing gains of XGBoost models with respect to individual features. Time period reductions in distribution of GTV volumes correlated with reductions in death by 3 years.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Combined use of LHSI, Statistical Profiling and Artificial Intelligence provided a basis for automating evidence-based discovery. Benchmarking AI models with simple probabilistic models provided a means of understanding when results are driven by general areas of overall risk vs. more complex interactions. The method can form a new appr","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prostate Advanced Radiation Technologies Investigating Quality of Life (PARTIQoL): Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Proton Therapy vs. IMRT for Localized Prostate Cancer 前列腺先进放射技术生活质量调查 (PARTIQoL):质子疗法与 IMRT 治疗局部前列腺癌的 III 期随机临床试验
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.012

Purpose/Objective(s)

Patients with localized prostate cancer have several treatment options including external beam radiotherapy with either photons or protons. Proton beam therapy (PBT) has certain dosimetric advantages with the potential to reduce treatment-associated morbidity and improve oncologic outcomes, but it is generally more resource intensive than intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To address the hypothesis that PBT results in improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs), PARTIQoL (NCT01617161) was conducted as a multi-center phase 3 randomized trial comparing the two modalities.

Materials/Methods

Patients with intermediate- or low-risk prostate cancer were randomized to PBT or IMRT, without hormonal therapy, stratified for institution, age, rectal spacer use, and fractionation (79.2 Gy/44 fractions vs 70 Gy/28 fractions). Participants were followed longitudinally to assess PROs of bowel, urinary, and sexual function for 60 months (mo) after completion of radiotherapy. Primary endpoint was to compare change from baseline in bowel quality of life (QOL) using the health care software score (range 0-100) at 24 mo. Secondary objectives include comparison of urinary and sexual functions, toxicity, and efficacy endpoints.

Results

Between 06/2012-11/2021, 450 patients from 30 recruiting centers were randomized: PBT (N=226) and IMRT (N=224), of whom 221 and 216 were eligible and started radiation on the respective arms. Median follow-up was 60.3 mo among 424 patients still alive. Median age was 68 yrs (range 46-89), 59% had intermediate-risk disease, 51% received hypofractionation, 48% used a rectal spacer, and 49% of PBT patients were treated with pencil beam scanning. There was no difference between PBT or IMRT in mean change of health care software bowel score at 24 mo (p=0.836), with both arms showing only small, clinically non-meaningful decline from baseline (see Table). Similarly, there was no difference in bowel function at earlier timepoints (3, 6, 9, 12, 18 mo) or later timepoints (36, 48, 60 mo). No differences were observed in other domains (urinary, sexual, hormonal) at any timepoint. There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (93.4% vs 93.7% at 60 mo, HR 1.16 [0.53, 2.57], p=0.706). There was no sustained difference in any QOL domain or PFS between arms in subgroups defined by stratification variables.

Conclusion

This prospective randomized clinical trial shows that patients treated with contemporary radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer achieve excellent QOL with highly effective tumor control, without measurable differences between PBT and IMRT. We continue to monitor participants for longer follow-up and secondary endpoints.
目的/目标:局部前列腺癌患者有多种治疗选择,包括使用光子或质子的体外放射治疗。质子束疗法(PBT)具有一定的剂量学优势,有可能降低治疗相关的发病率并改善肿瘤预后,但它通常比调强放射疗法(IMRT)需要更多的资源。材料/方法将中危或低危前列腺癌患者随机分配到 PBT 或 IMRT,不使用激素治疗,并根据机构、年龄、直肠间隔器使用情况和分次(79.2 Gy/44 分次 vs 70 Gy/28 分次)进行分层。在放疗结束后的60个月内,对参与者进行纵向随访,评估其肠道、泌尿和性功能方面的主要表现。次要目标包括泌尿和性功能、毒性和疗效终点的比较。结果2012年6月至2021年11月期间,来自30个招募中心的450名患者接受了随机治疗:PBT(226 例)和 IMRT(224 例),其中分别有 221 例和 216 例符合条件,并开始接受相应臂的放射治疗。在 424 名仍存活的患者中,中位随访时间为 60.3 个月。中位年龄为 68 岁(范围 46-89),59% 的患者患有中危疾病,51% 的患者接受了低分量治疗,48% 的患者使用了直肠间隔器,49% 的 PBT 患者接受了铅笔束扫描治疗。在 24 个月时,PBT 或 IMRT 在医疗保健软件肠道评分的平均变化方面没有差异(P=0.836),两组患者的评分与基线相比都仅有微小的、临床上无意义的下降(见表)。同样,较早时间点(3、6、9、12、18 个月)或较晚时间点(36、48、60 个月)的肠道功能也没有差异。其他方面(泌尿、性、激素)在任何时间点均未观察到差异。无进展生存期(PFS)无差异(60 个月时为 93.4% vs 93.7%,HR 1.16 [0.53, 2.57],P=0.706)。结论这项前瞻性随机临床试验表明,采用现代放疗治疗局部前列腺癌的患者在获得良好QOL的同时,肿瘤也得到了有效控制,PBT和IMRT之间没有明显差异。我们将继续对参与者进行长期随访和次要终点监测。
{"title":"Prostate Advanced Radiation Technologies Investigating Quality of Life (PARTIQoL): Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Proton Therapy vs. IMRT for Localized Prostate Cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Patients with localized prostate cancer have several treatment options including external beam radiotherapy with either photons or protons. Proton beam therapy (PBT) has certain dosimetric advantages with the potential to reduce treatment-associated morbidity and improve oncologic outcomes, but it is generally more resource intensive than intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To address the hypothesis that PBT results in improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs), PARTIQoL (NCT01617161) was conducted as a multi-center phase 3 randomized trial comparing the two modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Patients with intermediate- or low-risk prostate cancer were randomized to PBT or IMRT, without hormonal therapy, stratified for institution, age, rectal spacer use, and fractionation (79.2 Gy/44 fractions vs 70 Gy/28 fractions). Participants were followed longitudinally to assess PROs of bowel, urinary, and sexual function for 60 months (mo) after completion of radiotherapy. Primary endpoint was to compare change from baseline in bowel quality of life (QOL) using the health care software score (range 0-100) at 24 mo. Secondary objectives include comparison of urinary and sexual functions, toxicity, and efficacy endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 06/2012-11/2021, 450 patients from 30 recruiting centers were randomized: PBT (N=226) and IMRT (N=224), of whom 221 and 216 were eligible and started radiation on the respective arms. Median follow-up was 60.3 mo among 424 patients still alive. Median age was 68 yrs (range 46-89), 59% had intermediate-risk disease, 51% received hypofractionation, 48% used a rectal spacer, and 49% of PBT patients were treated with pencil beam scanning. There was no difference between PBT or IMRT in mean change of health care software bowel score at 24 mo (p=0.836), with both arms showing only small, clinically non-meaningful decline from baseline (see Table). Similarly, there was no difference in bowel function at earlier timepoints (3, 6, 9, 12, 18 mo) or later timepoints (36, 48, 60 mo). No differences were observed in other domains (urinary, sexual, hormonal) at any timepoint. There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (93.4% vs 93.7% at 60 mo, HR 1.16 [0.53, 2.57], p=0.706). There was no sustained difference in any QOL domain or PFS between arms in subgroups defined by stratification variables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This prospective randomized clinical trial shows that patients treated with contemporary radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer achieve excellent QOL with highly effective tumor control, without measurable differences between PBT and IMRT. We continue to monitor participants for longer follow-up and secondary endpoints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142358888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation with Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Breast Cancer: Primary Analysis of the HYPOSIB-Trial (ARO 2013-05) 乳腺癌低分次全乳放射治疗与同步综合增强:HYPOSIB-试验的初步分析(ARO 2013-05)
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.005
<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Moderate hypofractionation (HF) is considered standard of care for adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The trials establishing HF used a sequential tumor bed boost (seqB). Prior studies have studied simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-irradiation with conventional fractionation. The HYPOSIB-trial (NCT02474641) is one of three large trials that studied HF with SIB. Results for acute toxicity have been presented at a prior ASTRO-meeting and favored HF with SIB.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>HYPOSIB is a randomized-controlled, European, multi-center, non-inferiority trial. Randomization was performed 1:1 to the experimental arm (40 Gy to the breast and 48 Gy to the tumor bed in 16 fractions) or to the control arm (physician’s choice between conventional fractionation with SIB or seqB, or HF with seqB). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). At trial initiation, a DFS of 86.4% at 5 years was assumed in the control arm with a non-inferiority margin of 5% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42). After a blinded interim analysis showed fewer events than expected, the design was changed to a time-driven analysis 3 years after enrollment of the final patient with an adapted non-inferiority boundary for the HR of 1.757. Secondary endpoints were local control, locoregional control, overall survival, toxicity, quality of life, and cosmesis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 2015 and 2019, a total of 2310 patients were randomized, of which 2179 were treated according to protocol and were part of this analysis. Median follow-up was 52.9 months (range = 42.0-61.7 months). There were 141 patients who had at least one DFS-event, of which 75 were in the experimental arm. Local recurrence occurred in 31 patients, of which 16 were in the experimental arm. DFS at 5 years was 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 89.9-93.6%) in the experimental arm and 92.2% (95% CI = 89.9-94.0%) in the control arm (HR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.78-1.54; <em>P</em> = 0.58). Thus, non-inferiority of the experimental arm was established. Local control at 5 years was 98.2% (95% CI = 97.0-98.9%) in the experimental arm and 98.0% (95% CI = 96.4-98.9%) in the control arm (HR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.51-2.27; <em>P</em> = 0.84). Overall survival at 5 years was 98.2% (95% CI = 96.9-98.9%) in the experimental arm and 97.9% (95% CI = 96.5-98.7%) in the standard arm (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.39-1.55; <em>P</em> = 0.48). Cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 fibrosis at 5 years was 7.3% in the experimental arm and 8.4% in the experimental arm (odds ratio = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.63-1.16; <em>P</em> = 0.32). Telangiectasia grade ≥ 2 had occurred in 1.5% in the experimental arm and 1.5% in the control arm at 5 years (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.50-1.88; <em>P</em> = 0.92).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Together with the findings of IMPORT HIGH and RTOG 1005, the results of HYPOSIB demo
目的/目标:适度低分次(HF)被认为是保乳手术(BCS)后乳腺癌患者辅助全乳放疗的标准治疗方法。建立 HF 的试验采用的是肿瘤床序贯增强疗法(seqB)。之前的研究已对常规分次同时综合增强(SIB)放疗进行了研究。HYPOSIB试验(NCT02474641)是使用SIB研究高频放疗的三项大型试验之一。材料/方法HYPOSIB是一项随机对照、欧洲多中心、非劣效试验。试验以 1:1 随机分配到试验组(乳腺 40 Gy,肿瘤床 48 Gy,16 次分割)或对照组(由医生选择常规分割与 SIB 或 seqB,或 HF 与 seqB)。主要终点是无病生存期(DFS)。试验开始时,假设对照组的 5 年无病生存率为 86.4%,非劣效边际为 5%(危险比 [HR] = 1.42)。在盲法中期分析显示事件少于预期后,设计改为在最后一名患者入组 3 年后进行时间驱动分析,HR 的非劣效界值调整为 1.757。次要终点为局部控制、局部区域控制、总生存期、毒性、生活质量和外观。结果2015年至2019年间,共有2310名患者接受了随机治疗,其中2179名患者按照方案接受了治疗,并参与了本次分析。中位随访时间为 52.9 个月(范围 = 42.0-61.7 个月)。有 141 名患者至少有一次 DFS 事件,其中 75 人属于实验组。31例患者出现局部复发,其中16例为实验组患者。实验组 5 年的 DFS 为 92.0%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 89.9-93.6%),对照组为 92.2%(95% CI = 89.9-94.0%)(HR = 1.10;95% CI = 0.78-1.54;P = 0.58)。因此,实验组的非劣效性成立。5年后,实验组的局部控制率为98.2%(95% CI = 97.0-98.9%),对照组为98.0%(95% CI = 96.4-98.9%)(HR = 1.08;95% CI = 0.51-2.27;P = 0.84)。实验组的 5 年总生存率为 98.2% (95% CI = 96.9-98.9%),标准组为 97.9% (95% CI = 96.5-98.7%)(HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.39-1.55; P = 0.48)。5年后≥2级纤维化的累积发生率,实验组为7.3%,实验组为8.4%(几率比=0.86;95% CI = 0.63-1.16;P = 0.32)。结论结合 IMPORT HIGH 和 RTOG 1005 的研究结果,HYPOSIB 的结果表明,使用 SIB 的高频可被视为 BCS 后辅助放疗的标准治疗方法。
{"title":"Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation with Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Breast Cancer: Primary Analysis of the HYPOSIB-Trial (ARO 2013-05)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose/Objective(s)&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Moderate hypofractionation (HF) is considered standard of care for adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The trials establishing HF used a sequential tumor bed boost (seqB). Prior studies have studied simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-irradiation with conventional fractionation. The HYPOSIB-trial (NCT02474641) is one of three large trials that studied HF with SIB. Results for acute toxicity have been presented at a prior ASTRO-meeting and favored HF with SIB.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials/Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;HYPOSIB is a randomized-controlled, European, multi-center, non-inferiority trial. Randomization was performed 1:1 to the experimental arm (40 Gy to the breast and 48 Gy to the tumor bed in 16 fractions) or to the control arm (physician’s choice between conventional fractionation with SIB or seqB, or HF with seqB). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). At trial initiation, a DFS of 86.4% at 5 years was assumed in the control arm with a non-inferiority margin of 5% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42). After a blinded interim analysis showed fewer events than expected, the design was changed to a time-driven analysis 3 years after enrollment of the final patient with an adapted non-inferiority boundary for the HR of 1.757. Secondary endpoints were local control, locoregional control, overall survival, toxicity, quality of life, and cosmesis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Between 2015 and 2019, a total of 2310 patients were randomized, of which 2179 were treated according to protocol and were part of this analysis. Median follow-up was 52.9 months (range = 42.0-61.7 months). There were 141 patients who had at least one DFS-event, of which 75 were in the experimental arm. Local recurrence occurred in 31 patients, of which 16 were in the experimental arm. DFS at 5 years was 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 89.9-93.6%) in the experimental arm and 92.2% (95% CI = 89.9-94.0%) in the control arm (HR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.78-1.54; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.58). Thus, non-inferiority of the experimental arm was established. Local control at 5 years was 98.2% (95% CI = 97.0-98.9%) in the experimental arm and 98.0% (95% CI = 96.4-98.9%) in the control arm (HR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.51-2.27; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.84). Overall survival at 5 years was 98.2% (95% CI = 96.9-98.9%) in the experimental arm and 97.9% (95% CI = 96.5-98.7%) in the standard arm (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.39-1.55; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.48). Cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 fibrosis at 5 years was 7.3% in the experimental arm and 8.4% in the experimental arm (odds ratio = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.63-1.16; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.32). Telangiectasia grade ≥ 2 had occurred in 1.5% in the experimental arm and 1.5% in the control arm at 5 years (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.50-1.88; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.92).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Together with the findings of IMPORT HIGH and RTOG 1005, the results of HYPOSIB demo","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is the IROC H&N credentialing phantom an effective surrogate for different anatomical sites?: Using IROC's H&N phantom for various sites. IROC H&N 凭证模型是不同解剖部位的有效替代物吗?将 IROC 的 H&N 模型用于不同部位。
IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.053
Fre'Etta M D Brooks, Mallory C Glenn, Victor Hernandez, Jordi Saez, Julianne M Pollard-Larkin, Christine B Peterson, Rebecca M Howell, Christopher L Nelson, Catharine H Clark, Stephen F Kry

Purpose: The IROC head and neck phantom is used to credential institutions for IMRT delivery for all anatomical sites where delivery of modulated therapy is a primary challenge. This study evaluated how appropriate the use of this phantom is for varied clinical anatomy by evaluating how closely the IROC head and neck phantom described clinical dose errors from beam modeling compared to various anatomical sites.

Methods: The MLC offset, transmission, PDD and seven additional beam modeling parameters for a Varian accelerator were modified in RayStation to match community data at the 2.5, 25, 50, 75 and 97.5 percentile levels. Modifications were evaluated on 25 H&N phantom cases and 25 clinical cases (H&N, prostate, lung, mesothelioma, and brain), generating 2,000 plan perturbations. Differences in mean dose delivered to clinical target volumes (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were compared between phantom and clinical plans to assess the relationship between dose deviations in phantom versus clinical CTVs, and as a function of 18 different complexity metrics.

Results: Perturbations to MLC offset and transmission parameters demonstrated the greatest impact on dose accuracy for phantom and clinical plans (for all anatomic sites). The phantom demonstrated equivalent or greater sensitivity to these parameter perturbations when compared to clinical sites, largely aligning with treatment complexity. The mean MLC Gap best described the impact of errors in TPS beam modeling parameters in phantoms plan and clinical plans from various anatomical sites.

Conclusion: When compared across various anatomical sites, the IROC H&N credentialing phantom exhibited similar or greater sensitivity to errors in the treatment planning system. As such, it is a suitable surrogate device for assessing institutional performance across various anatomical sites. If an institution successfully irradiates the phantom, that result confers confidence that IMRT to a wide range of anatomical sites can be successfully delivered by the institution.

目的:IROC 头颈部模型被用于对所有解剖部位进行 IMRT 治疗的机构进行认证,在这些部位进行调制治疗是一项主要挑战。本研究通过评估 IROC 头颈部模型与不同解剖部位相比,在多大程度上描述了射束建模产生的临床剂量误差,从而评估了该模型在不同临床解剖部位的适用性:在 RayStation 中修改了瓦里安加速器的 MLC 偏移、透射、PDD 和其他七个射束建模参数,以匹配 2.5、25、50、75 和 97.5 百分位数水平的社区数据。对 25 个 H&N 模型病例和 25 个临床病例(H&N、前列腺、肺、间皮瘤和脑)的修改进行了评估,产生了 2,000 次计划扰动。比较了模型和临床计划的临床靶体积(CTV)和危险器官(OAR)的平均剂量差异,以评估模型和临床 CTV 的剂量偏差之间的关系,并将其作为 18 种不同复杂性指标的函数:结果:对 MLC 偏移和传输参数的干扰对模型和临床计划(所有解剖部位)的剂量准确性影响最大。与临床部位相比,模型对这些参数扰动的敏感度相当或更高,这在很大程度上与治疗复杂性相一致。平均 MLC 差距最能说明不同解剖部位的模型计划和临床计划中 TPS 光束建模参数误差的影响:在对不同解剖部位进行比较时,IROC H&N 证书模型对治疗计划系统误差的敏感性相似或更高。因此,它是评估不同解剖部位机构绩效的合适替代设备。如果一家机构成功地对该模型进行了照射,那么这一结果就会让人相信,该机构可以成功地对各种解剖部位进行 IMRT 治疗。
{"title":"Is the IROC H&N credentialing phantom an effective surrogate for different anatomical sites?: Using IROC's H&N phantom for various sites.","authors":"Fre'Etta M D Brooks, Mallory C Glenn, Victor Hernandez, Jordi Saez, Julianne M Pollard-Larkin, Christine B Peterson, Rebecca M Howell, Christopher L Nelson, Catharine H Clark, Stephen F Kry","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The IROC head and neck phantom is used to credential institutions for IMRT delivery for all anatomical sites where delivery of modulated therapy is a primary challenge. This study evaluated how appropriate the use of this phantom is for varied clinical anatomy by evaluating how closely the IROC head and neck phantom described clinical dose errors from beam modeling compared to various anatomical sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MLC offset, transmission, PDD and seven additional beam modeling parameters for a Varian accelerator were modified in RayStation to match community data at the 2.5, 25, 50, 75 and 97.5 percentile levels. Modifications were evaluated on 25 H&N phantom cases and 25 clinical cases (H&N, prostate, lung, mesothelioma, and brain), generating 2,000 plan perturbations. Differences in mean dose delivered to clinical target volumes (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were compared between phantom and clinical plans to assess the relationship between dose deviations in phantom versus clinical CTVs, and as a function of 18 different complexity metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perturbations to MLC offset and transmission parameters demonstrated the greatest impact on dose accuracy for phantom and clinical plans (for all anatomic sites). The phantom demonstrated equivalent or greater sensitivity to these parameter perturbations when compared to clinical sites, largely aligning with treatment complexity. The mean MLC Gap best described the impact of errors in TPS beam modeling parameters in phantoms plan and clinical plans from various anatomical sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When compared across various anatomical sites, the IROC H&N credentialing phantom exhibited similar or greater sensitivity to errors in the treatment planning system. As such, it is a suitable surrogate device for assessing institutional performance across various anatomical sites. If an institution successfully irradiates the phantom, that result confers confidence that IMRT to a wide range of anatomical sites can be successfully delivered by the institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1