Investigational New Drugs最新文献

Interleukin (IL)-1 signaling has an essential role in tumor progression and immunosuppression and is linked to acquired resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Nadunolimab is an IL1RAP (IL-1 receptor accessory protein)-targeting antibody that blocks IL-1α/IL-1β signaling and has enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. We investigated the safety and preliminary efficacy of nadunolimab with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic solid tumors who had progressed on previous checkpoint inhibitor treatment, suggesting acquired checkpoint inhibitor resistance (NCT04452214). This phase 1b trial enrolled patients with metastatic disease who had exhausted or declined standard-of-care alternatives. Patients received nadunolimab (5 mg/kg) and standard-dose pembrolizumab. The primary objective was to assess safety. Secondary objectives were anti-tumor response as per iRECIST, pharmacokinetics, and changes in immune mediators. Fifteen patients with stage IV cancer (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma) entered the trial. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported for 7 patients (47%). There was one dose-limiting toxicity of febrile neutropenia. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse event was dysphagia (two patients). Seven patients (47%) had reductions in target lesion size. Median iPFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.4-8.6). Median OS was 19.7 months (95% CI 4.3-28.7) with 67% 1-year survival. Survival was significantly longer in patients with higher baseline tumor infiltration of CD163 + macrophages and natural killer cells and in patients with reduced on-treatment circulating IL-6 levels or neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Nadunolimab with pembrolizumab had an acceptable safety profile, and prolonged disease control was observed in a subset of patients. The results support further development of nadunolimab in combination with checkpoint inhibitors.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) presents a great challenge in the clinic due to its poor prognosis. Prior research has identified c-Myc as a promising therapeutic target in DLBCL; however, direct targeting of c-Myc protein has proven challenging. The bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) protein family, which acts as transcriptional and epigenetic regulators, plays a crucial role in super-enhancer organization and transcriptional regulation of oncogenic drivers like c-Myc, offering an alternative approach. Recently developed BET proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) compounds can rapidly and effectively degrade BET proteins and potentially offer a more durable effect than traditional BET inhibitors. In this work, we compared the anti-tumor activity of a BET PROTAC, ARV-825, with a BET inhibitor, JQ1, in DLBCL. Cell proliferation was assessed by CCK-8 assay, apoptosis was evaluated by Annexin V/PI staining, and the cell cycle was analyzed by staining DNA with propidium iodide (PI). Western blotting was used to determine the expression levels of BET family proteins and its downstream regulatory gene c-Myc, and the in vivo SCID mouse model implanted with SU-DHL-4 cells was used to analyze the in vivo drug efficacy. Our results showed that ARV-825 was superior to JQ1 in inhibiting DLBCL cell proliferation, inducing apoptosis, promoting cell cycle arrest, and prolonging survival. Notably, ARV-825 was more effective at downregulating c-Myc and BET protein levels than JQ1 in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. These evidences suggest that BET-PROTACs may offer a promising novel strategy for the clinical treatment of DLBCL.

Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, making it one of the most debilitating diseases in our time. Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, the development of chemoresistance and the occurrence of secondary tumours pose significant challenges. While several promising anti-tumour agents have been identified, their clinical utility is often limited due to toxicity and associated side effects. MicroRNAs (mi-RNAs) are critical regulators of gene expression, and their altered levels are closely linked to cancer development and progression. Although some microRNAs have shown potential as biomarkers for cancer detection, their integration into routine clinical practice has yet to be realized. Numerous candidate microRNAs exhibit therapeutic potential for cancer treatment; however, further research is needed to create efficient, patient-compliant, and customized drug delivery systems. In recent decades, various nanotechnology platforms have successfully transitioned to clinical trials, particularly in the field of RNA nanotechnology. Several RNA nanoparticles have been developed to address key challenges in vivo for targeting cancer, demonstrating favourable biodistribution characteristics. Studies have shown that RNA nanoparticles, characterized by precise stoichiometry and homogeneity, can effectively target tumour cells while avoiding aggregation in normal, healthy tissues following systemic injection. Animal models have demonstrated that RNA nanoparticles can deliver therapeutics such as siRNA and anti-microRNA, effectively inhibiting tumour growth. Using nanoparticles conjugated with antibodies and/or peptides enhances the targeted delivery and sustained release of microRNAs and anti-microRNAs, which may reduce the required therapeutic dosage and minimize systemic and cellular damage. This review focuses on developing microRNA nanoformulations to improve cellular uptake, bioavailability, and accumulation at tumour sites, assessing their potential anti-tumour efficacy against various types of malignancies. The significance of these advancements in clinical oncology cannot be overstated.

Olaparib is selected based on the presence of BRCA mutations in patient populations; however, further investigation is still required regarding its effect on restoring homologous recombination (HR) through the inactivation of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Therefore, identifying regulators of NHEJ could increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to Olaparib by inhibiting DNA damage repair is a major focus of current research. Loss of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), which is a major components of NHEJ, compromises DNA damage repair, and the resulting increase in DNA damage burden may heighten reliance on poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-dependent DNA repair in cancer cells, rendering them more susceptible to PARP inhibitor therapy. However, DNA-PK alone is not sufficient to enhance the effectiveness of Olaparib, so various adjuvant and combination therapies are being explored. We classified colorectal cancer (CRC) cells based on their sensitivity to Olaparib and found that they were categorized according to TP53 status. Here, we examine the role of DNA-PK in the response to Olaparib, emphasizing its relationship with TP53 status. Our findings indicate that the inhibition of DNA-PK enhances sensitivity to Olaparib and induces phosphorylation of p53 exclusively in cells with TP53 wild-type (WT). Furthermore, using CRC patient-derived cells (PDC) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model, we show that the sensitivity of Olaparib is determined TP53 and DNA-PK genotypes. These findings highlight TP53 and DNA-PK as potential predictive biomarkers for optimizing PARP inhibitor-based therapy in CRC.

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key driver of cancer progression, with therapies increasingly targeting metabolic weaknesses. Peptide YY (PYY), a gastrointestinal hormone, regulates cellular activity, but its influence on mitochondrial health in lung cancer remains poorly understood. We explored how PYY1-36, a bioactive fragment of PYY, affects mitochondrial stability in NCI-H1581 lung cancer cells. Using dose-response experiments, we measured oxidative stress by tracking lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, mitochondrial ROS levels, and oxidative DNA damage (8-OHdG). Energy production was evaluated through ATP levels, oxygen consumption rates (OCR), and Complex I activity. We also analyzed mitochondrial biogenesis markers (NRF1, TFAM, PGC-1α) and the RNA-binding protein RBM43 via qPCR and immunoblotting. Dose-dependent tests showed that PYY1-36 triggers mitochondrial oxidative damage, marked by higher LDH release and ROS spikes. These changes aligned with sharp drops in ATP production and disrupted respiratory function. Notably, PYY1-36 reduced mitochondrial mass and biogenesis, supported by weaker MitoTracker Red signals and lower mtDNA/nDNA ratios. Key regulators NRF1 and TFAM were strongly suppressed, pointing to widespread mitochondrial failure. Intriguingly, PYY1-36 blocked PGC-1α protein synthesis without altering mRNA levels, suggesting a post-transcriptional control mechanism. PYY1-36 also boosted RBM43 levels. Knocking down RBM43 reversed PYY1-36's effects on PGC-1α and mitochondrial health. Our findings reveal RBM43 as a central player in PYY1-36-induced mitochondrial dysfunction through its suppression of PGC-1α translation. Targeting RBM43 could unlock new strategies to tackle metabolic chaos in lung cancer.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by clonal expansion of myeloid precursors, often accompanied by poor prognostic outcomes in older populations due to molecular heterogeneity and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Glasdegib, a potent inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, has emerged as a targeted agent that enhances chemosensitivity and demonstrates favorable pharmacodynamic profiles in combination regimens. This systematic review evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of Glasdegib-based therapies in the management of AML.

Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to identify eligible studies reported up to August 2024. Using R version R.4.4.1, we reported outcomes as pooled proportions and confidence intervals (CIs). The survival data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstructed.

Results: The pooled two-year overall survival for Glasdegib plus chemotherapy was 30% (95% CI [27-34%], I² = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed rates of 36% (95% CI [30-42%], Cytarabine and Daunorubicin), 27% (95% CI [20-36%], Low-Dose Cytarabine), and 25% (95% CI [20-31%], Azacitidine. Median survival times were highest for Glasdegib plus Cytarabine and Daunorubicin at 17.6 months (95% CI [15.6-21.9]), followed by 10.4 months (95% CI [8.22-12.3]) for Glasdegib plus Azacitidine, and 7.89 months (95% CI [5.47-11.5]) for Glasdegib plus Low-Dose Cytarabine. Safety analysis revealed varied adverse event rates for Glasdegib plus chemotherapy, with febrile neutropenia (37%), nausea (47%), vomiting (32%), and QT prolongation (44%) being the most commonly reported.

Conclusion: Glasdegib combined with chemotherapy demonstrates promising efficacy in improving survival outcomes for AML patients, particularly in combination with Cytarabine and Daunorubicin. While adverse events were common, they were generally manageable, supporting Glasdegib as a viable therapeutic option. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment regimens and evaluate long-term safety and quality-of-life outcomes.

HP518 is an oral PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) protein degrader targeting the wild-type androgen receptor (WT-AR) and mutant AR ligand-binding domain (AR-LBD). A multicenter, first-in-human, open-label Phase 1 dose escalation study was conducted in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor activity of HP518. Twenty-two patients with mCRPC with disease progression on at least 1 novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and ≤ 1 line of chemotherapy received HP518 once daily orally in sequential cohorts. Patients were not selected for AR-LBD mutations. Objectives were to assess safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics (PK), as well as efficacy by PSA₅₀ response and radiographic response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. Exploratory objectives included genomic profiling using cell-free DNA. The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were Grade 1 or 2. The most common AEs were nausea and vomiting, fatigue, constipation, diarrhea, and decreased appetite. Only one (vomiting) out of 10 serious adverse events (SAE) was considered drug-related. No patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and no AEs led to dose reduction or study discontinuation. Following multiple dosing of HP518, the PK appeared to plateau showing a less than dose-proportional relationship between exposure and dosage. Two patients demonstrated a partial response, and three patients showed a PSA50 response. In this initial Phase 1 study, HP518 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and responses in a limited subset of mCRPC patients with progression after ARPI warranting further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05252364.

The US (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-accelerated approval pathway facilitates early access to oncology drugs based on surrogate endpoints, with required confirmatory post-marketing trials. However, regulatory decisions vary globally, with some drugs withdrawn in the US remaining approved in Japan. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of Japanese professional society guidelines, evaluating recommendations for seven accelerated approval cancer drugs withdrawn from the US market but retained in Japan. We assessed for level of evidence and level of treatment preference ratings with consensus across guidelines issued by the corresponding Japanese professional societies. Four of the seven drugs (57%) were recommended as highly or moderately preferred treatment options in Japanese guidelines: gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia, gefitinib for EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer, bevacizumab for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, and atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel for PD-L1-positive triple-negative breast cancer. Detailed analysis of regulatory history and background of guideline recommendation revealed discrepancies in the assessment of clinical benefits: gemtuzumab ozogamicin failed to demonstrate benefits amid safety concerns, while gefitinib, bevacizumab, and atezolizumab were more controversial, although they did not demonstrate improved overall survival in post-marketing trials. Despite regulatory withdrawal in the US due to unproven clinical benefits, drugs retained in Japan received positive guideline recommendations. This finding highlights regional variations in regulatory decisions and different approaches to benefit-risk assessments, suggesting a need for improved transparency in Japan's regulatory decisions and guideline recommendations, with clearer justifications for endorsing drugs that are considered to have unproven clinical benefits in the US.

RMX1002 (grapiprant) is a selective E-type prostanoid receptor 4 (EP4) antagonist and a promising candidate for cancer therapy, potentially enhancing anti-tumor immune responses. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of RMX1002 as monotherapy and in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody toripalimab for advanced solid tumors. This multicenter, phase I trial enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumors. This study included three phases: Ia (dose-escalation of RMX1002 monotherapy from 200 to 650 mg BID), Ib (dose-escalation from 500 to 650 mg BID in combination with toripalimab), and Ic (dose-expansion of 500 mg BID with toripalimab). Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy were assessed. A total of 45 patients were enrolled (17 in phase Ia, 12 in phase Ib, and 16 in phase Ic). No dose-limiting toxicity was reported, and the MTD was not reached. Overall, 21 patients experienced RMX1002-related adverse events with CTCAE grade ≥ 3. Pharmacokinetics revealed rapid absorption of RMX1002 with the maximum concentration (C_max) reached within 2 to 5 h, and dose-dependent increases in C_max and area under the concentration-time curve. The increase in urinary metabolite of PGE2 suggested the inhibition of EP4 signaling pathway. The best response was stable disease, reported in 64.7%, 28.6%, and 18.8% of patients in phase Ia, Ib, and Ic, respectively. RMX1002 was well tolerated and showed a best response of stable disease. RMX1002 500 mg BID with toripalimab 240 mg every 3 weeks is the recommended dose for future trials.

Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized tumor treatment. However, robust and effective testing platforms remain lacking, especially for the selection of the optimized therapy at the patient-specific level. Unlike conventional treatment evaluations, testing platforms for cancer immunotherapy must incorporate not only tumor cells but also the tumor microenvironment (TME), including immune components. Recently, emergence of patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs), an in vitro preclinical model, has provided a novel approach for studying tumor evolution and assessing treatment responses, and shows great potential when coculturing with immune cells to study the mechanisms of immunotherapy efficacy and resistance. However, traditional organoid technology is limited in capturing the full impact of the TME on tumor behaviors due to the absence of stromal components. To circumvent these restrictions, complex organoid cocultures with immune cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts and vasculatures are developed. In this review, we summarized recent advances in PDTO culture techniques for modeling the TME and explored the application of complex tumor organoids in cancer immunotherapy.