JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes最新文献

Background: The World Health Organization is committed to strengthening access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention and its integration into primary care services. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the delivery of primary care, including HIV-related services. To determine the extent of this disruption, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the changes in access to PrEP services during the pandemic and the reasons for these changes.

Methods: A search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cinahl for studies published between January 2020 and January 2023. Selected articles described self-reported disruptions to PrEP service access associated with the COVID-19 pandemic or its responses. Pooled effect sizes were computed using a random-effects model.

Results: Thirteen studies involving 12,652 PrEP users were included in our analysis. The proportion of participants reporting a disruption in access to PrEP services during the COVID-19 pandemic ranged from 3% to 56%, with a pooled proportion of 21% (95% confidence intervals: 8% to 38%). Social restrictions, financial constraints, and limited health insurance coverage were key factors affecting access to PrEP services during the pandemic.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to quantify the extent of disruptions to accessing PrEP services because of the COVID-19 pandemic. To increase the ability of primary care services to maintain PrEP services during public health crises, a mixture of strategies is worth considering. These include multi-month PrEP prescriptions, telehealth services, deployment of peer support groups to provide a community-based service or home delivery, and provision of financial support interventions.

Background: South Africa has a high HIV incidence and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is available as public-sector standard of care. Access to alternative prevention methods for women may further reduce HIV acquisition.

Setting: South African public sector.

Methods: We performed a systematic search for high-quality up-to-date guidelines recommending dapivirine rings as PrEP using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation -Adolopment process. We appraised the systematic review and randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence underpinning the selected guideline's recommendations and conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence-to-decision framework guided the adaptation of source guideline recommendations, according to our local context.

Results: We identified the 2021 World Health Organization PrEP Guidelines, informed by 2 placebo-controlled RCTs, which were included in a contemporaneous systematic review. There were 23 fewer HIV acquisitions per 1000 clients with dapivirine ring vs placebo (95% confidence interval: 10 to 34), with no increase in adverse events (moderate certainty evidence). We found no RCTs comparing dapivirine to oral PrEP or among adolescent/pregnant/breastfeeding clients. Dapivirine is less cost-effective than oral PrEP at $14.59/ring, at the current price.

Conclusions: The source guideline recommendation was adapted for the local context. Dapivirine ring seems to be less efficacious than oral PrEP, although comparative studies are lacking. Data on adolescents and pregnancy are also lacking, currently limiting the use of dapivirine as an alternative for women unable to take oral PrEP. At the current price, dapivirine is not cost-effective and unaffordable for inclusion in the South African Essential Medicines List.

Background: AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma (AIDS-KS) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV in Africa. Mortality among people with AIDS-KS on antiretroviral therapy remains high compared with people on antiretroviral therapy who do not have AIDS-KS.

Setting: People living with HIV with Kaposi sarcoma (KS) who participated in 2 randomized trials (A5263/AMC066 [advanced stage] and A5264/AMC067 [mild-to-moderate stage]) conducted by AIDS Clinical Trials Group/AIDS Malignancy Consortium in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods: We estimated mortality rates over the trial period. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to identify baseline characteristics associated with mortality and compared mortality rates between participants who had KS progression within 12 weeks of treatment initiation (early progression of KS [KS-PD]) and those who did not.

Results: Of the 329 and 189 eligible participants in A5263/AMC066 and A5264/AMC067, 71 (21.6%) and 24 (12.7%) died, respectively. In both trials, hypoalbuminemia was associated with increased hazards of death compared with normal albumin; A5263/AMC066: mild hypoalbuminemia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 3.01; 95% CI: 1.42 to 6.29), moderate hypoalbuminemia (aHR = 5.11; 95% CI: 2.54 to 10.29), and severe hypoalbuminemia (aHR = 14.58; 95% CI: 6.32 to 35.60), and A5264/AMC067: mild hypoalbuminemia (aHR = 5.66; 95% CI: 1.90 to 16.93) and moderate hypoalbuminemia (aHR = 7.02; 95% CI: 2.57 to 19.15). The rate of death was higher among participants who had early KS-PD than those without early KS-PD in A5263/AMC066 (HR = 5.09; 95% CI: 1.71 to 15.19) but not in A5264/AMC067 (HR = 1.74; 95% CI: 0.66 to 4.62).

Conclusions: Albumin measurements may be used to identify individuals at higher risk of death after initiating KS treatment and for evaluation of interventions that can reduce AIDS-KS mortality.