Pub Date : 2024-11-05eCollection Date: 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae178
Aubrey Chichonyi Kalungia, Martin Kampamba, David Banda, Andrew Munkuli Bambala, Sarah Marshall, Melanie Newport, Anja St Clair-Jones, Luke Alutuli, Elias Chambula, Lucky Munsaka, Audrey Hamachila, Chiluba Mwila, Duncan Chanda, Joseph Chizimu, Roma Chilengi, Michael Okorie
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) aim to optimize antibiotic use and prevent antimicrobial resistance.
Objective: This study assessed the impact of ASPs, initiated using a hub-and-spoke approach, on antibiotic use in Zambian public hospitals.
Methods: A pre-post study was conducted in 10 ASP-naive hospitals across Zambia using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s hospital-based ASP core elements (i.e. leadership, accountability, pharmacy expertise, stewardship actions, tracking progress, reporting and education) checklist and the global point prevalence survey methodology. The intervention involved technical staff from a national 'hub' hospital with an established ASP providing on-site orientation and mentorship to multidisciplinary teams of healthcare workers at 10 'spoke' hospitals to build capacity in antimicrobial stewardship. ASP core elements and inpatient antibiotic use prevalence (AUP) were assessed before and 12 months after ASP implementation. Data were statistically analysed.
Results: The adoption of ASP core elements improved significantly (P = 0.001, 95% CI: -17.8 to -5.42). AUP decreased from 50.1% (±5.8, n = 1477) to 44.3% (±4.6, n = 1400) after 12 months, though the reduction was not statistically significant (P = 0.442; 95% CI: -9.8 to 21.6), with 'Watch' list antibiotics remaining the most commonly prescribed across the hospitals.
Conclusions: The hub-and-spoke approach successfully catalysed ASPs in public hospitals in Zambia, demonstrating the potential for improving antibiotic use practices over time, provided structural challenges are addressed. This approach and insights can guide stakeholders in Zambia and similar settings in enhancing hospital ASPs.
背景:抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)旨在优化抗生素的使用并预防抗生素耐药性:抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)旨在优化抗生素的使用并预防抗生素耐药性:本研究评估了赞比亚公立医院采用 "中心辐射"(hub-and-spoke)方式启动的抗菌药物管理计划对抗生素使用的影响:方法:采用美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的医院 ASP 核心要素(即领导力、问责制、药学专业知识、监管行动、进展跟踪、报告和教育)核对表和全球点流行率调查方法,在赞比亚 10 家未开展 ASP 的医院开展了一项事前-事后研究。干预措施包括由一家已建立 ASP 的国家 "中心 "医院的技术人员为 10 家 "辐射 "医院的多学科医护人员团队提供现场指导和辅导,以提高抗菌药物管理能力。在 ASP 实施前和实施 12 个月后,对 ASP 核心要素和住院病人抗生素使用率 (AUP) 进行了评估。对数据进行了统计分析:结果:ASP 核心要素的采用率显著提高(P = 0.001,95% CI:-17.8 至-5.42)。12 个月后,AUP 从 50.1%(±5.8,n = 1477)降至 44.3%(±4.6,n = 1400),但降幅无统计学意义(P = 0.442;95% CI:-9.8 至 21.6):在解决结构性挑战的前提下,"中心辐射 "方法成功地促进了赞比亚公立医院的抗生素应用,显示出随着时间的推移改善抗生素使用实践的潜力。这种方法和见解可以指导赞比亚和类似环境中的利益相关者加强医院的 ASPs。
{"title":"Impact of a hub-and-spoke approach to hospital antimicrobial stewardship programmes on antibiotic use in Zambia.","authors":"Aubrey Chichonyi Kalungia, Martin Kampamba, David Banda, Andrew Munkuli Bambala, Sarah Marshall, Melanie Newport, Anja St Clair-Jones, Luke Alutuli, Elias Chambula, Lucky Munsaka, Audrey Hamachila, Chiluba Mwila, Duncan Chanda, Joseph Chizimu, Roma Chilengi, Michael Okorie","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae178","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) aim to optimize antibiotic use and prevent antimicrobial resistance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the impact of ASPs, initiated using a hub-and-spoke approach, on antibiotic use in Zambian public hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post study was conducted in 10 ASP-naive hospitals across Zambia using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s hospital-based ASP core elements (i.e. leadership, accountability, pharmacy expertise, stewardship actions, tracking progress, reporting and education) checklist and the global point prevalence survey methodology. The intervention involved technical staff from a national 'hub' hospital with an established ASP providing on-site orientation and mentorship to multidisciplinary teams of healthcare workers at 10 'spoke' hospitals to build capacity in antimicrobial stewardship. ASP core elements and inpatient antibiotic use prevalence (AUP) were assessed before and 12 months after ASP implementation. Data were statistically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adoption of ASP core elements improved significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.001, 95% CI: -17.8 to -5.42). AUP decreased from 50.1% (±5.8, <i>n</i> = 1477) to 44.3% (±4.6, <i>n</i> = 1400) after 12 months, though the reduction was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.442; 95% CI: -9.8 to 21.6), with 'Watch' list antibiotics remaining the most commonly prescribed across the hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hub-and-spoke approach successfully catalysed ASPs in public hospitals in Zambia, demonstrating the potential for improving antibiotic use practices over time, provided structural challenges are addressed. This approach and insights can guide stakeholders in Zambia and similar settings in enhancing hospital ASPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 6","pages":"dlae178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535659/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142582800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01eCollection Date: 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae167
Hermann Do Rego, Yousra Kherabi, Stephane Corvec, Chloé Plouzeau-Jayle, Coralie Bouchiat, Gabriel Macheda, Sylvain Meyer, Vincent Cattoir, Caroline Piau, Thomas Guillard, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Eric Farfour, Raphaël Lecomte, Marlène Amara, Christophe Isnard, Alban Le Monnier, Benoit Pilmis
Background: The incidence of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis is increasing over time. Data on the impact of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amoxicillin on treatment outcomes are scarce. The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of E. faecalis infective endocarditis and to evaluate whether the MIC of amoxicillin might influence mortality.
Materials: We retrospectively included all consecutive patients diagnosed with definite E. faecalis infective endocarditis between 2013 and 2020 in 11 French hospitals. We extracted data from the local diagnosis-related group (DRG) database and matched these data with microbiological results. Amoxicillin MIC was determined by Etest strip. The primary endpoints were endocarditis-related mortality and risk factors for endocarditis-related mortality including amoxicillin MIC.
Results: A total of 403 patients with definite E. faecalis infective endocarditis were included. Patients were predominantly male (76.4%) with a median age of 74 years (67-82). Embolic complications occurred in 170 (42.1%) patients. Cardiac surgery was performed in 158 (61.5%) patients. The endocarditis-related mortality rate was 28.3% and the median delay between mortality and onset of hospitalization was 24 (9; 41) days. E. faecalis MIC of amoxicillin was available for 246 (61%) patients. The median MIC was 0.5 mg/L (0.4-0.7). Amoxicillin MIC was not found to be associated with in-hospital mortality. None of the variables included in the multivariate model were identified as a risk factor for mortality and there was no correlation between mortality and the duration of treatment for 4 weeks versus 6 weeks.
Conclusions: Higher amoxicillin MIC was not a risk factor leading to endocarditis-related mortality in definite E. faecalis infective endocarditis. However, further studies are needed to assess the effect of amoxicillin MIC on relapse.
背景:随着时间的推移,粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎的发病率越来越高。有关阿莫西林最低抑菌浓度(MIC)对治疗效果影响的数据很少。本研究旨在描述粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎的流行病学,并评估阿莫西林的 MIC 是否会影响死亡率:我们回顾性地纳入了法国 11 家医院在 2013 年至 2020 年期间确诊为粪大肠杆菌感染性心内膜炎的所有连续患者。我们从当地的诊断相关组(DRG)数据库中提取了数据,并将这些数据与微生物学结果进行了比对。阿莫西林 MIC 值由 Etest 试纸测定。主要终点是心内膜炎相关死亡率和心内膜炎相关死亡率的风险因素(包括阿莫西林 MIC):共纳入了 403 例确诊为粪大肠杆菌感染性心内膜炎的患者。患者主要为男性(76.4%),中位年龄为 74 岁(67-82 岁)。170例(42.1%)患者出现栓塞并发症。158例(61.5%)患者接受了心脏手术。与心内膜炎相关的死亡率为 28.3%,死亡率与住院时间的中位延迟时间为 24 (9; 41) 天。246 名(61%)患者的粪大肠杆菌阿莫西林 MIC 值可用。MIC 中位数为 0.5 mg/L (0.4-0.7)。未发现阿莫西林 MIC 与院内死亡率有关。多变量模型中的所有变量均未被确定为死亡率的风险因素,死亡率与治疗时间(4 周与 6 周)之间也没有相关性:结论:在确诊的粪大肠杆菌感染性心内膜炎患者中,阿莫西林MIC较高并不是导致心内膜炎相关死亡率的危险因素。然而,还需要进一步的研究来评估阿莫西林 MIC 对复发的影响。
{"title":"Outcomes of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> infective endocarditis according to MIC of amoxicillin: a multicentric study.","authors":"Hermann Do Rego, Yousra Kherabi, Stephane Corvec, Chloé Plouzeau-Jayle, Coralie Bouchiat, Gabriel Macheda, Sylvain Meyer, Vincent Cattoir, Caroline Piau, Thomas Guillard, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Eric Farfour, Raphaël Lecomte, Marlène Amara, Christophe Isnard, Alban Le Monnier, Benoit Pilmis","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae167","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> infective endocarditis is increasing over time. Data on the impact of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amoxicillin on treatment outcomes are scarce. The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of <i>E. faecalis</i> infective endocarditis and to evaluate whether the MIC of amoxicillin might influence mortality.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>We retrospectively included all consecutive patients diagnosed with definite <i>E. faecalis</i> infective endocarditis between 2013 and 2020 in 11 French hospitals. We extracted data from the local diagnosis-related group (DRG) database and matched these data with microbiological results. Amoxicillin MIC was determined by Etest strip. The primary endpoints were endocarditis-related mortality and risk factors for endocarditis-related mortality including amoxicillin MIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 403 patients with definite <i>E. faecalis</i> infective endocarditis were included. Patients were predominantly male (76.4%) with a median age of 74 years (67-82). Embolic complications occurred in 170 (42.1%) patients. Cardiac surgery was performed in 158 (61.5%) patients. The endocarditis-related mortality rate was 28.3% and the median delay between mortality and onset of hospitalization was 24 (9; 41) days. <i>E. faecalis</i> MIC of amoxicillin was available for 246 (61%) patients. The median MIC was 0.5 mg/L (0.4-0.7). Amoxicillin MIC was not found to be associated with in-hospital mortality. None of the variables included in the multivariate model were identified as a risk factor for mortality and there was no correlation between mortality and the duration of treatment for 4 weeks versus 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher amoxicillin MIC was not a risk factor leading to endocarditis-related mortality in definite <i>E. faecalis</i> infective endocarditis. However, further studies are needed to assess the effect of amoxicillin MIC on relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 6","pages":"dlae167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528299/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibacterial agent used to treat infections caused by Gram-positive organisms. It is FDA-approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections (ABSSIs) but is increasingly being used off-label to treat invasive bacterial infections such as osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infection and infective endocarditis.
Objectives: This study describes the clinical outcomes and adverse reactions related to oritavancin.
Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study conducted over a 5 year period at a tertiary care medical centre. Ninety-five adult patients were included in this study and were followed for 1 year after the last dose of oritavancin.
Results: The most common indication for oritavancin at our institution was osteomyelitis, followed by ABSSI. Other indications were vertebral infection, hardware-associated infection, bacteraemia and infective endocarditis. Fourteen percent (13/95) of patients developed an adverse reaction to oritavancin during the study period. Cure with no recurrence up to 1 year after the last dose of oritavancin was achieved in 74% (53/71) of patients, and the treatment failure rate was 19% (14/71 patients).
Conclusions: Oritavancin is an effective agent that can be used to treat invasive Gram-positive bacterial infections other than ABSSI. Adverse events requiring drug discontinuation were common.
{"title":"Experience with expanded use of oritavancin in a tertiary hospital: indications, tolerability and outcomes.","authors":"Thilinie Dulanjalee Bandaranayake, Christopher Radcliffe, Melanie Cvercko, Marjorie Golden, Ritche Manos Hao","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae174","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibacterial agent used to treat infections caused by Gram-positive organisms. It is FDA-approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections (ABSSIs) but is increasingly being used off-label to treat invasive bacterial infections such as osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infection and infective endocarditis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study describes the clinical outcomes and adverse reactions related to oritavancin.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study conducted over a 5 year period at a tertiary care medical centre. Ninety-five adult patients were included in this study and were followed for 1 year after the last dose of oritavancin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common indication for oritavancin at our institution was osteomyelitis, followed by ABSSI. Other indications were vertebral infection, hardware-associated infection, bacteraemia and infective endocarditis. Fourteen percent (13/95) of patients developed an adverse reaction to oritavancin during the study period. Cure with no recurrence up to 1 year after the last dose of oritavancin was achieved in 74% (53/71) of patients, and the treatment failure rate was 19% (14/71 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oritavancin is an effective agent that can be used to treat invasive Gram-positive bacterial infections other than ABSSI. Adverse events requiring drug discontinuation were common.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 6","pages":"dlae174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to public health. Misuse or overuse of antimicrobials contributes to the emergence of AMR. Data on antimicrobial prescribing represent the cornerstone for guiding antimicrobial stewardship strategies. This study aimed to assess the use, indications, classification, and quality indicators of antimicrobials prescribed to patients in four tertiary hospitals in Niger.
Methods: This cross-sectional study used the methodology for Global Point Prevalence Surveys in tertiary hospitals between January and April 2024. Hospital records of all inpatients on admission at 08:00 hours on a specific day were reviewed for antimicrobial use during the survey.
Results: The overall prevalence of antibiotic use across hospitals was 54.5% (n = 470/862), ranging between 66.2% (n = 149/234) and 44.3% (n = 183/258). Most antibiotics used were antibacterials (89.0%, n = 637). Third-generation cephalosporins (48.2%, 307/637), imidazole derivatives (14.7%, 105/716), penicillins with extended spectrum (9.6%, 69/716), and fluoroquinolones (6.1%, 44/716) were the most commonly prescribed classes of antibiotics. Most antibiotics (84.9%, n = 608) were prescribed to treat community-acquired infections, while surgical prophylaxis accounted for 6.4% (n = 47/716). Most antibiotics (96.1%; n = 688/716) were used empirically, and less than a quarter (20.7%) of antibiotics prescribed had a documented stop/review date recorded. Only, 4.2% (n = 31/716) of prescribed antibiotics had cultures and susceptibility testing requested.
Conclusion: This study shows that antibiotic prescription rates are high in tertiary hospitals, with relatively high use of third-generation cephalosporins. Most antibiotics were empirically used and not guided by culture and susceptibility testing. These results could be the subject of key interventions for hospital antibiotic stewardship strategies in Niger.
{"title":"Antimicrobial use in hospitalized patients: a point prevalence survey across four tertiary hospitals in Niger.","authors":"Ounoussa Tapha, Cyriaque Comlan Degbey, Abdourahamane Yacouba, Espère Mahouna Tchioundjro, N'Kpingou Théodore Nadakou, Ibrahim Alkassoum Salifou, Sahada Moussa Saley, Mamane Daou, Souleymane Brah, Eric Omar Adehossi, Antoine Vikkey Hinson, Saidou Mamadou","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae175","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to public health. Misuse or overuse of antimicrobials contributes to the emergence of AMR. Data on antimicrobial prescribing represent the cornerstone for guiding antimicrobial stewardship strategies. This study aimed to assess the use, indications, classification, and quality indicators of antimicrobials prescribed to patients in four tertiary hospitals in Niger.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the methodology for Global Point Prevalence Surveys in tertiary hospitals between January and April 2024. Hospital records of all inpatients on admission at 08:00 hours on a specific day were reviewed for antimicrobial use during the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of antibiotic use across hospitals was 54.5% (<i>n</i> = 470/862), ranging between 66.2% (<i>n</i> = 149/234) and 44.3% (<i>n</i> = 183/258). Most antibiotics used were antibacterials (89.0%, <i>n</i> = 637). Third-generation cephalosporins (48.2%, 307/637), imidazole derivatives (14.7%, 105/716), penicillins with extended spectrum (9.6%, 69/716), and fluoroquinolones (6.1%, 44/716) were the most commonly prescribed classes of antibiotics. Most antibiotics (84.9%, <i>n</i> = 608) were prescribed to treat community-acquired infections, while surgical prophylaxis accounted for 6.4% (<i>n</i> = 47/716). Most antibiotics (96.1%; <i>n</i> = 688/716) were used empirically, and less than a quarter (20.7%) of antibiotics prescribed had a documented stop/review date recorded. Only, 4.2% (<i>n</i> = 31/716) of prescribed antibiotics had cultures and susceptibility testing requested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that antibiotic prescription rates are high in tertiary hospitals, with relatively high use of third-generation cephalosporins. Most antibiotics were empirically used and not guided by culture and susceptibility testing. These results could be the subject of key interventions for hospital antibiotic stewardship strategies in Niger.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523492/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae176
Webrod Mufwambi, Kunda Musuku, Jimmy Hangoma, Ngoni Veddie Muzondo, Larry Mweetwa, Steward Mudenda
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes have been implemented around the world to optimally manage antimicrobial use to attenuate antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study assessed the knowledge and practices of community pharmacists towards AMS strategies in the Lusaka District, Zambia.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 194 community pharmacists in the Lusaka district using a structured questionnaire from August 2022 to September 2022. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0.
Results: Of the 194 participants, 86% of the community pharmacists had good knowledge of AMS. The present study found that 83.5% were aware of AMS strategies used in community pharmacy practice. Further, 83.5% of the CPs were familiar with the goals of AMS and 89.2% believed that AMS was necessary for their pharmacy practice. Furthermore, 66.7% of the participants exhibited good practice towards the AMS strategies. Finally, 61.3% frequently avoided the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials that were not necessary.
Conclusions: According to the findings of this study, the majority of community pharmacists had good knowledge of the AMS strategies that were employed to combat AMR; nonetheless, some of them had poor practices. Therefore, there is a need for community pharmacists to have access to sufficient ongoing professional development programmes and educational activities through AMS programmes to address AMR.
{"title":"Community pharmacists' knowledge and practices towards antimicrobial stewardship: findings and implications.","authors":"Webrod Mufwambi, Kunda Musuku, Jimmy Hangoma, Ngoni Veddie Muzondo, Larry Mweetwa, Steward Mudenda","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes have been implemented around the world to optimally manage antimicrobial use to attenuate antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study assessed the knowledge and practices of community pharmacists towards AMS strategies in the Lusaka District, Zambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted among 194 community pharmacists in the Lusaka district using a structured questionnaire from August 2022 to September 2022. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 194 participants, 86% of the community pharmacists had good knowledge of AMS. The present study found that 83.5% were aware of AMS strategies used in community pharmacy practice. Further, 83.5% of the CPs were familiar with the goals of AMS and 89.2% believed that AMS was necessary for their pharmacy practice. Furthermore, 66.7% of the participants exhibited good practice towards the AMS strategies. Finally, 61.3% frequently avoided the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials that were not necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the findings of this study, the majority of community pharmacists had good knowledge of the AMS strategies that were employed to combat AMR; nonetheless, some of them had poor practices. Therefore, there is a need for community pharmacists to have access to sufficient ongoing professional development programmes and educational activities through AMS programmes to address AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521336/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae173
Kaushik Puranam, Meagan Harrington, Edwards Kasonkanji, Gerald Tegha, Maria J Chikasema, Mena L Chawinga, Maganizo B Chagomerana, Robert Krysiak, Satish Gopal, David van Duin, Melissa B Miller, Matthew S Painschab
Objectives: To evaluate causes of fever, including resistance patterns, in patients undergoing cancer treatment in Malawi.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, enrolled patients undergoing chemotherapy at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi were given a thermometer. If a temperature of ≥38°C was recorded, they were instructed to return for hospitalization, standardized fever workup, and antibiotics. All patients were followed through 90 days post-fever event or completion of chemotherapy.
Results: One hundred and five patients were screened and 50 were enrolled. Of the enrollees, 26 (52%) were men and 26 (52%) were HIV positive, with a mean ART duration of 7 years and CD4 count of 293 cells/µL. The most common diagnoses were aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (40%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (22%). Twenty-three febrile events were recorded from 15 patients. Of the 23 events, a causative agent was isolated in 13 cases: Escherichia coli (6), Plasmodium falciparum (3), Streptococcus pneumoniae (2), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1) and Citrobacter freundii (1). Of the six E. coli isolates, all were found to be resistant to fluoroquinolones and 4/6 (66%) were resistant to cephalosporins. All patients but one survived; the death was attributed to Pseudomonas bacteraemia.
Conclusions: This study describes laboratory-confirmed causes of neutropenic fever (NF) in cancer patients in Malawi. Gram-negative rods, followed by malaria, were the most common source of infection. Gram-negative rods were associated with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. Malaria and resistant bacterial infections should be considered for NF treatment and prevention in sub-Saharan Africa.
{"title":"Aetiology, susceptibility and outcomes of fever in patients receiving chemotherapy in Malawi: a prospective study.","authors":"Kaushik Puranam, Meagan Harrington, Edwards Kasonkanji, Gerald Tegha, Maria J Chikasema, Mena L Chawinga, Maganizo B Chagomerana, Robert Krysiak, Satish Gopal, David van Duin, Melissa B Miller, Matthew S Painschab","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate causes of fever, including resistance patterns, in patients undergoing cancer treatment in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, enrolled patients undergoing chemotherapy at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi were given a thermometer. If a temperature of ≥38°C was recorded, they were instructed to return for hospitalization, standardized fever workup, and antibiotics. All patients were followed through 90 days post-fever event or completion of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and five patients were screened and 50 were enrolled. Of the enrollees, 26 (52%) were men and 26 (52%) were HIV positive, with a mean ART duration of 7 years and CD4 count of 293 cells/µL. The most common diagnoses were aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (40%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (22%). Twenty-three febrile events were recorded from 15 patients. Of the 23 events, a causative agent was isolated in 13 cases: <i>Escherichia coli</i> (6), <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> (3), <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> (2), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (1) and <i>Citrobacter freundii</i> (1). Of the six <i>E. coli</i> isolates, all were found to be resistant to fluoroquinolones and 4/6 (66%) were resistant to cephalosporins. All patients but one survived; the death was attributed to <i>Pseudomonas</i> bacteraemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes laboratory-confirmed causes of neutropenic fever (NF) in cancer patients in Malawi. Gram-negative rods, followed by malaria, were the most common source of infection. Gram-negative rods were associated with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. Malaria and resistant bacterial infections should be considered for NF treatment and prevention in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae157
Teagan L King, Elissa Rennert-May, Ranjani Somayaji, Jenine Leal, Jason E Black, John M Conly, Daniel Gregson
Objectives: We evaluated the costs of susceptible and resistant Escherichia coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) in adults. Secondary outcomes were the impact of BSI on length of stay (LOS), readmissions and death.
Methods: We examined a population-based retrospective cohort of blood cultures from 2011 to 2018 in Calgary, Canada, linked to microcosting and gross costing data. Propensity score matching was completed, and costs were compared between no BSI and E. coli BSI over 90 days using linear regression.
Results: A total of 4581 BSIs in 89 673 adults experienced E. coli bacteraemia during the study period. The mean cost of an E. coli BSI at 90 days was $39 072 (SD: $95 747) in adults. Ceftriaxone-resistant (CRO-R) E. coli, resistant to fluoroquinolones (FQ) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, compared with susceptible E. coli BSI resulted in the greatest mean cost at $53 899 and the highest odds of readmission, increased LOS, and death.
Conclusions: E. coli BSI is associated with substantial costs. Total cost differences were highest in those with CRO-R E. coli with resistance to FQ and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Over the study period, bacteraemia secondary to these strains alone, added over $9 million to costs for healthcare in the Calgary Zone.
{"title":"Evaluating the costs of <i>Escherichia coli</i> bloodstream infections: a population-based cohort study in a large metropolitan Canadian region.","authors":"Teagan L King, Elissa Rennert-May, Ranjani Somayaji, Jenine Leal, Jason E Black, John M Conly, Daniel Gregson","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae157","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the costs of susceptible and resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> bloodstream infections (BSIs) in adults. Secondary outcomes were the impact of BSI on length of stay (LOS), readmissions and death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined a population-based retrospective cohort of blood cultures from 2011 to 2018 in Calgary, Canada, linked to microcosting and gross costing data. Propensity score matching was completed, and costs were compared between no BSI and <i>E. coli</i> BSI over 90 days using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4581 BSIs in 89 673 adults experienced <i>E. coli</i> bacteraemia during the study period. The mean cost of an <i>E. coli</i> BSI at 90 days was $39 072 (SD: $95 747) in adults. Ceftriaxone-resistant (CRO-R) <i>E. coli</i>, resistant to fluoroquinolones (FQ) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, compared with susceptible <i>E. coli</i> BSI resulted in the greatest mean cost at $53 899 and the highest odds of readmission, increased LOS, and death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>E. coli</i> BSI is associated with substantial costs. Total cost differences were highest in those with CRO-R <i>E. coli</i> with resistance to FQ and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Over the study period, bacteraemia secondary to these strains alone, added over $9 million to costs for healthcare in the Calgary Zone.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523496/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae165
Christie Cabral, Tingting Zhang, Isabel Oliver, Paul Little, Lucy Yardley, Helen Lambert
Objectives: Self-medication with antibiotics is common practice in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This review synthesizes the qualitative evidence on influences on perceptions and practices in relation to self-medication by the public with antibiotics in LMIC.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted of relevant medical, international and social science databases. Searching, screening, data extraction and quality appraisal followed standard methods. A meta-ethnographic approach was used for synthesis, starting with translation of studies and using a line-of-argument approach to develop the final themes.
Results: The search identified 78 eligible studies. Antibiotics were understood as a powerful, potentially dangerous but effective medicine for treating infections. This perception was strongly influenced by the common experience of being prescribed antibiotics for infections, both individually and collectively. This contributed to an understanding of antibiotics as a rational treatment for infection symptoms that was sanctioned by medical authorities. Accessing antibiotics from medical professionals was often difficult logistically and financially. In contrast, antibiotics were readily available over the counter from local outlets. People viewed treating infection symptoms with antibiotics as rational practice, although they were concerned about the risks to the individual and only took them when they believed they were needed.
Conclusions: A new model to explain self-medication with antibiotics is presented. This uses the socio-ecological model to integrate influences that operate at individual, community and wider socioeconomic levels, drawing on theories of medical authority and the medicalization and commercialization of health. Interventions to reduce overuse of antibiotics in LMIC need to address both clinical practice and community self-medication practices together.
{"title":"Influences on use of antibiotics without prescription by the public in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative evidence.","authors":"Christie Cabral, Tingting Zhang, Isabel Oliver, Paul Little, Lucy Yardley, Helen Lambert","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae165","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Self-medication with antibiotics is common practice in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This review synthesizes the qualitative evidence on influences on perceptions and practices in relation to self-medication by the public with antibiotics in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted of relevant medical, international and social science databases. Searching, screening, data extraction and quality appraisal followed standard methods. A meta-ethnographic approach was used for synthesis, starting with translation of studies and using a line-of-argument approach to develop the final themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 78 eligible studies. Antibiotics were understood as a powerful, potentially dangerous but effective medicine for treating infections. This perception was strongly influenced by the common experience of being prescribed antibiotics for infections, both individually and collectively. This contributed to an understanding of antibiotics as a rational treatment for infection symptoms that was sanctioned by medical authorities. Accessing antibiotics from medical professionals was often difficult logistically and financially. In contrast, antibiotics were readily available over the counter from local outlets. People viewed treating infection symptoms with antibiotics as rational practice, although they were concerned about the risks to the individual and only took them when they believed they were needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A new model to explain self-medication with antibiotics is presented. This uses the socio-ecological model to integrate influences that operate at individual, community and wider socioeconomic levels, drawing on theories of medical authority and the medicalization and commercialization of health. Interventions to reduce overuse of antibiotics in LMIC need to address both clinical practice and community self-medication practices together.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503652/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae161
Mark Fahmy, Adam Stewart, Siok-Keen Tey, Krispin Hajkowicz
Objectives: Elizabethkingia species are uncommon causes of bloodstream infections, representing a true opportunistic and multi-drug-resistant pathogen to immunocompromised or vulnerable hosts. Despite this, data are lacking regarding optimal management strategy for infections with this organism, which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. We describe patient characteristics, management and outcomes in this case series.
Patients and methods: All inpatients at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital with a positive blood culture for Elizabethkingia spp. were identified by database query. Clinical information including medical history, source of infection, attempts at source control and outcome were collected. Laboratory data including duration of bacteraemia and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were also collected.
Results: All patients had severe defects of innate and adaptive immunity. Targeted therapy was started promptly and efforts at source identification and control were appropriately pursued. Despite this, outcomes were generally poor. A previously unrecognized presentation of relapsing infection was described in one case, requiring long-term suppressive antimicrobials to control. One case died as a result of infection and one case was cured, but died soon after due to complications of immunosuppression.
Conclusions: Treatment of these organisms is challenging due to limited effective therapy, development of on treatment resistance and profound host immunocompromise. Up-front use of multiple, optimally dosed antimicrobials, attempting source control and attempting to restore host immune function all appear to be key to achieving good outcomes.
{"title":"<i>Elizabethkingia</i> bloodstream infections in severely immunocompromised patients: persistent, relapsing and associated with high mortality.","authors":"Mark Fahmy, Adam Stewart, Siok-Keen Tey, Krispin Hajkowicz","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae161","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae161","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong><i>Elizabethkingia</i> species are uncommon causes of bloodstream infections, representing a true opportunistic and multi-drug-resistant pathogen to immunocompromised or vulnerable hosts. Despite this, data are lacking regarding optimal management strategy for infections with this organism, which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. We describe patient characteristics, management and outcomes in this case series.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All inpatients at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital with a positive blood culture for <i>Elizabethkingia</i> spp. were identified by database query. Clinical information including medical history, source of infection, attempts at source control and outcome were collected. Laboratory data including duration of bacteraemia and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had severe defects of innate and adaptive immunity. Targeted therapy was started promptly and efforts at source identification and control were appropriately pursued. Despite this, outcomes were generally poor. A previously unrecognized presentation of relapsing infection was described in one case, requiring long-term suppressive antimicrobials to control. One case died as a result of infection and one case was cured, but died soon after due to complications of immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of these organisms is challenging due to limited effective therapy, development of on treatment resistance and profound host immunocompromise. Up-front use of multiple, optimally dosed antimicrobials, attempting source control and attempting to restore host immune function all appear to be key to achieving good outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523632/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The inappropriate use of antibiotics in hospitals contributes to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study evaluated the prevalence of antibiotic use and adherence to the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) classification of antibiotics across 16 hospitals in Zambia.
Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study employing the WHO Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) methodology and WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics was conducted among inpatients across 16 hospitals in December 2023, Zambia. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 17.0.
Results: Of the 1296 inpatients surveyed in the 16 hospitals, 56% were female, and 54% were aged between 16 and 50 years. The overall prevalence of antibiotic use was 70%. Additionally, 52% of the inpatients received Watch group antibiotics, with ceftriaxone being the most prescribed antibiotic. Slightly below half (48%) of the inpatients received Access group antibiotics. Compliance with the local treatment guidelines was 53%.
Conclusions: This study found a high prevalence of prescribing and use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients across the surveyed hospitals in Zambia. The high use of Watch group antibiotics was above the recommended threshold indicating non-adherence to the WHO AWaRe guidelines for antibiotic use. Hence, there is a need to establish and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship programmes that promote the rational use of antibiotics in hospitals in Zambia.
{"title":"Antibiotic use and adherence to the WHO AWaRe guidelines across 16 hospitals in Zambia: a point prevalence survey.","authors":"Joseph Yamweka Chizimu, Steward Mudenda, Kaunda Yamba, Chileshe Lukwesa, Raphael Chanda, Ruth Nakazwe, Misheck Shawa, Herman Chambaro, Harvey K Kamboyi, Aubrey Chichonyi Kalungia, Duncan Chanda, Sombo Fwoloshi, Elimas Jere, Tiza Mufune, Derick Munkombwe, Peter Lisulo, Tebuho Mateele, Jeewan Thapa, Kenneth Kapolowe, Nyambe Sinyange, Cephas Sialubanje, Nathan Kapata, Mirfin Mpundu, Freddie Masaninga, Khalid Azam, Chie Nakajima, Makomani Siyanga, Nathan Nsubuga Bakyaita, Evelyn Wesangula, Martin Matu, Yasuhiko Suzuki, Roma Chilengi","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae170","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inappropriate use of antibiotics in hospitals contributes to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study evaluated the prevalence of antibiotic use and adherence to the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) classification of antibiotics across 16 hospitals in Zambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional study employing the WHO Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) methodology and WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics was conducted among inpatients across 16 hospitals in December 2023, Zambia. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 17.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1296 inpatients surveyed in the 16 hospitals, 56% were female, and 54% were aged between 16 and 50 years. The overall prevalence of antibiotic use was 70%. Additionally, 52% of the inpatients received Watch group antibiotics, with ceftriaxone being the most prescribed antibiotic. Slightly below half (48%) of the inpatients received Access group antibiotics. Compliance with the local treatment guidelines was 53%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a high prevalence of prescribing and use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients across the surveyed hospitals in Zambia. The high use of Watch group antibiotics was above the recommended threshold indicating non-adherence to the WHO AWaRe guidelines for antibiotic use. Hence, there is a need to establish and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship programmes that promote the rational use of antibiotics in hospitals in Zambia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503655/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}