首页 > 最新文献

JCO oncology practice最新文献

英文 中文
Is Seeing Believing? Imaging Accuracy and the Challenge of Clinical Staging in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Cancer. 眼见为实吗?错配修复缺陷结肠癌的影像学准确性和临床分期的挑战。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1200/OP-25-01221
Anwaar Saeed, Thomas J George
{"title":"Is Seeing Believing? Imaging Accuracy and the Challenge of Clinical Staging in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Cancer.","authors":"Anwaar Saeed, Thomas J George","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-01221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-01221","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2501221"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TPMT-Cisplatin: Lessons in Citation Integrity and Scientific Oversight. tpmt -顺铂:引文完整性和科学监督的教训。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1200/OP-25-00913
Youngwoo Cho, Thomas Chen, Mark J Ratain

Purpose: To assess the ongoing citation of the 2009 Nature Genetics article by Ross et al linking TPMT to cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and to evaluate the extent to which its disputed findings persist in the literature.

Methods: A total of 378 Google Scholar citations of the 2009 Nature Genetics publication from 2009 to 2025 were examined, of which 214 PubMed-indexed manuscripts were screened and categorized by citation nuance (positive, negative/mixed) and citation characteristics using the framework proposed by Suelzer et al in a 2019 JAMA Network Opens study. Citation context was independently assessed by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus of all three authors.

Results: Most articles cited the 2009 publication in a favorable or uncritical manner, even in publications after 2015 US Food and Drug Administration's cisplatin label revision acknowledging that the 2009 findings were flawed. A minority of citations acknowledged conflicting evidence or questioned the study's validity.

Conclusion: Although the 2009 publication's findings have been widely challenged, many subsequent authors continue to cite the study without acknowledging its limitations. This pattern highlights the need for stronger postpublication oversight, more transparent editorial practices by high-impact journals, and greater critical engagement by authors when citing foundational literature to ensure that clinical and research narratives are shaped by reliable and current evidence.

目的:评估2009年Ross等人关于TPMT与顺铂诱导耳毒性的Nature Genetics文章的持续引用,并评估其有争议的发现在文献中持续存在的程度。方法:采用Suelzer等人在2019年JAMA Network open研究中提出的框架,对2009年《自然遗传学》(Nature Genetics)期刊2009年至2025年的378亿篇被学者引用的论文进行筛选,并根据引用细微差别(正面、负面/混合)和引用特征对214篇pubmed索引的论文进行分类。引文上下文由两位审稿人独立评估,差异由三位作者一致解决。结果:大多数文章以赞成或不批判的方式引用了2009年的出版物,即使在2015年美国食品和药物管理局顺铂标签修订后的出版物中也承认2009年的发现存在缺陷。少数引用承认了相互矛盾的证据或质疑研究的有效性。结论:尽管2009年发表的研究结果受到广泛质疑,但许多后续作者继续引用该研究,而不承认其局限性。这种模式强调了需要更强的出版后监督,高影响力期刊更透明的编辑实践,以及作者在引用基础文献时更大的批判性参与,以确保临床和研究叙述是由可靠和最新的证据形成的。
{"title":"<i>TPMT</i>-Cisplatin: Lessons in Citation Integrity and Scientific Oversight.","authors":"Youngwoo Cho, Thomas Chen, Mark J Ratain","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the ongoing citation of the 2009 <i>Nature Genetics</i> article by Ross et al linking <i>TPMT</i> to cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and to evaluate the extent to which its disputed findings persist in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 378 Google Scholar citations of the 2009 <i>Nature Genetics</i> publication from 2009 to 2025 were examined, of which 214 PubMed-indexed manuscripts were screened and categorized by citation nuance (positive, negative/mixed) and citation characteristics using the framework proposed by Suelzer et al in a 2019 <i>JAMA Network Opens</i> study. Citation context was independently assessed by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus of all three authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most articles cited the 2009 publication in a favorable or uncritical manner, even in publications after 2015 US Food and Drug Administration's cisplatin label revision acknowledging that the 2009 findings were flawed. A minority of citations acknowledged conflicting evidence or questioned the study's validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the 2009 publication's findings have been widely challenged, many subsequent authors continue to cite the study without acknowledging its limitations. This pattern highlights the need for stronger postpublication oversight, more transparent editorial practices by high-impact journals, and greater critical engagement by authors when citing foundational literature to ensure that clinical and research narratives are shaped by reliable and current evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500913"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146119090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adoption and Regional Variation of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in the United States. 前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描在美国的应用及其地区差异。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1200/OP-25-00617
Michael S Leapman, Jessica B Long, Sarah Westvold, Maximilian Rabil, Preston C Sprenkle, Isaac Y Kim, Gabriela Spilberg, Lawrence Saperstein, Jaleh Fallah, Daniel Suzman, Catherine C Lerro, Jianjin Xu, Donna R Rivera, Paul G Kluetz, R Jeffrey Karnes, Michaela Dinan, Aaron P Mitchell, Natalia Kunst, Shi-Yi Wang, Xiaomei Ma, Cary P Gross

Purpose: Despite evidence of diagnostic accuracy but unclear long-term clinical benefit, national utilization patterns of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) are undefined.

Methods: We conducted a serial cross-sectional study to evaluate the use of PET imaging among commercial insurance beneficiaries with prostate cancer using administrative claims from deidentified Blue Cross Blue Shield Axis database. Eligible patients included prevalent and incident prostate cancer cases. We calculated the proportions undergoing PET imaging in semiannual periods from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2024. We examined the association between regional-level contextual sociodemographic and health care characteristics, and regional use of PSMA-PET imaging in 2024.

Results: A total of 514,750 male beneficiaries age 40-89 years with prostate cancer were identified between 2016 and 2024. The proportion of individuals with prostate cancer undergoing PET imaging increased from 4.5 [95% CI, 4.1 to 4.9] per 1,000 in the first half of 2016 to 77.6 (95% CI, 76.2 to 79.1) per 1,000 in the second half of 2024, P < .001. Increases in PET were driven by uptake of PSMA-PET following approval in 2021, which increased from 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9) per 1,000 in the second half of 2021 to 77.0 (95% CI, 75.5 to 78.5) per 1,000 in the second half of 2024, P < .001. PSMA-PET use in 2024 was higher in regions with greater education (99.3 v 114.6 per 1,000 in lowest [Q1] v highest [Q4] educated) and income (95.4 v 112.3 per 1,000 in Q1 v Q4 income) measures, P < .001.

Conclusion: PSMA-PET was rapidly incorporated into clinical practice among commercial insurance beneficiaries with prostate cancer with higher adoption in geographic regions with higher income and education.

目的:尽管有证据表明前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描(PSMA-PET)的诊断准确性,但长期临床效益尚不清楚,但全国范围内的使用模式尚不明确。方法:我们进行了一项系列横断面研究,评估PET成像在前列腺癌商业保险受益人中的应用,该研究使用的是来自已识别的蓝十字蓝盾轴数据库的行政索赔。符合条件的患者包括前列腺癌的发病率和发病率。我们计算了2016年1月1日至2024年12月31日每半年进行一次PET成像的比例。我们研究了2024年区域水平背景社会人口学和卫生保健特征与PSMA-PET成像的区域使用之间的关系。结果:2016年至2024年间,共有514,750名年龄在40-89岁之间的男性前列腺癌患者被确定。前列腺癌患者接受PET成像的比例从2016年上半年的每千人4.5例[95% CI, 4.1 - 4.9]增加到2024年下半年的每千人77.6例(95% CI, 76.2 - 79.1), P < 0.001。PET的增加是由2021年批准后PSMA-PET的吸收推动的,从2021年下半年的每1000例0.8例(95% CI, 0.6至0.9)增加到2024年下半年的每1000例77.0例(95% CI, 75.5至78.5),P < 0.001。2024年PSMA-PET的使用在受教育程度较高的地区(最低[第一季度]和最高[第四季度]受教育程度为99.3 vs 114.6 / 1000)和收入(第一季度vs第四季度收入为95.4 vs 112.3 / 1000), P < .001。结论:PSMA-PET在前列腺癌商业保险受益人中迅速应用于临床实践,在高收入和高教育程度的地理区域采用率较高。
{"title":"Adoption and Regional Variation of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in the United States.","authors":"Michael S Leapman, Jessica B Long, Sarah Westvold, Maximilian Rabil, Preston C Sprenkle, Isaac Y Kim, Gabriela Spilberg, Lawrence Saperstein, Jaleh Fallah, Daniel Suzman, Catherine C Lerro, Jianjin Xu, Donna R Rivera, Paul G Kluetz, R Jeffrey Karnes, Michaela Dinan, Aaron P Mitchell, Natalia Kunst, Shi-Yi Wang, Xiaomei Ma, Cary P Gross","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00617","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite evidence of diagnostic accuracy but unclear long-term clinical benefit, national utilization patterns of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) are undefined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a serial cross-sectional study to evaluate the use of PET imaging among commercial insurance beneficiaries with prostate cancer using administrative claims from deidentified Blue Cross Blue Shield Axis database. Eligible patients included prevalent and incident prostate cancer cases. We calculated the proportions undergoing PET imaging in semiannual periods from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2024. We examined the association between regional-level contextual sociodemographic and health care characteristics, and regional use of PSMA-PET imaging in 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 514,750 male beneficiaries age 40-89 years with prostate cancer were identified between 2016 and 2024. The proportion of individuals with prostate cancer undergoing PET imaging increased from 4.5 [95% CI, 4.1 to 4.9] per 1,000 in the first half of 2016 to 77.6 (95% CI, 76.2 to 79.1) per 1,000 in the second half of 2024, <i>P</i> < .001. Increases in PET were driven by uptake of PSMA-PET following approval in 2021, which increased from 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9) per 1,000 in the second half of 2021 to 77.0 (95% CI, 75.5 to 78.5) per 1,000 in the second half of 2024, <i>P</i> < .001. PSMA-PET use in 2024 was higher in regions with greater education (99.3 <i>v</i> 114.6 per 1,000 in lowest [Q1] <i>v</i> highest [Q4] educated) and income (95.4 <i>v</i> 112.3 per 1,000 in Q1 <i>v</i> Q4 income) measures, <i>P</i> < .001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSMA-PET was rapidly incorporated into clinical practice among commercial insurance beneficiaries with prostate cancer with higher adoption in geographic regions with higher income and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Subcutaneous Immunotherapies in Solid Tumors: Are We Truly Expanding Access and Efficiency? 实体瘤的皮下免疫治疗:我们是否真的扩大了可及性和效率?
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI: 10.1200/OP-25-00052
Gogo-Ogute Ibodeng, Chelsee Jensen, Scott A Soefje, Aakash Desai
{"title":"Subcutaneous Immunotherapies in Solid Tumors: Are We Truly Expanding Access and Efficiency?","authors":"Gogo-Ogute Ibodeng, Chelsee Jensen, Scott A Soefje, Aakash Desai","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00052","DOIUrl":"10.1200/OP-25-00052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"181-184"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fertility Preservation in People With Cancer: ASCO Guideline Clinical Insights. 癌症患者的生育能力保存:ASCO指南临床见解。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI: 10.1200/OP-25-00223
Alison W Loren, Christina Lacchetti, H Irene Su
{"title":"Fertility Preservation in People With Cancer: ASCO Guideline Clinical Insights.","authors":"Alison W Loren, Christina Lacchetti, H Irene Su","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00223","DOIUrl":"10.1200/OP-25-00223","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"193-197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143996674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum: Telephone Survey-Reported Perceptions of Telehealth Visits Among Black and Non-Black Patients Diagnosed With Cancer. 勘误:电话调查报告的黑人和非黑人诊断为癌症患者的远程医疗访问的看法。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI: 10.1200/OP-25-00338
Ilona Fridman, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Lauren C J Barrow, Matthew R Dunn, Regina Jones, Alan C Kinlaw, Angela B Smith, Jacob N Stein, Samantha Tam, William A Wood, Jennifer Elston Lafata
{"title":"Erratum: Telephone Survey-Reported Perceptions of Telehealth Visits Among Black and Non-Black Patients Diagnosed With Cancer.","authors":"Ilona Fridman, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Lauren C J Barrow, Matthew R Dunn, Regina Jones, Alan C Kinlaw, Angela B Smith, Jacob N Stein, Samantha Tam, William A Wood, Jennifer Elston Lafata","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00338","DOIUrl":"10.1200/OP-25-00338","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"342"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144186997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Centered Genomic Diagnostic Testing for AML: A Quality Improvement Project. 以患者为中心的AML基因组诊断检测:一个质量改进项目。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-03 DOI: 10.1200/OP-24-00776
Jenny M Ho, Uday Deotare, Aatif Qureshi, Laila Schenkel, Benjamin Chin-Yee, Anahita Mohseni Meybodi, Emilie Lalonde, Lalit Saini, Alan Gob, Selay Lam, Cyrus Hsia, Bekim Sadikovic, Benjamin Hedley, Ian Chin-Yee

Purpose: The classification of AML and therapeutic options are now largely driven by genetically defined subtypes. Personalization of treatment relies on timely completion and reporting of cytogenetic and molecular tests, creating challenges in clinical practice. We initiated a quality improvement study with the aim to optimize the process for ordering of genomic diagnostic tests and to reduce test turnaround times (TATs).

Methods: A multidisciplinary working group consisting of hematologists, laboratory scientists, technologists, and hematopathologists was formed and identified the following tests as necessary for expedited testing in patients with AML younger than 75 years: next-generation sequencing (NGS) myeloid panel, karyotype analysis, FLT3 PCR, NPM1 PCR, CBFB::MYH11 PCR, and RUNX1::RUNX1T1 PCR, and proposed a reflexive flow cytometry-triggered genomic diagnostic testing algorithm for newly diagnosed AML (ND-AML). We used the model of improvement and implemented three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles: education and guidelines for management of ND-AML, implementation of the reflex laboratory-triggered diagnostic testing algorithm for ND-AML, and automation of NGS workflow. We assessed compliance with test ordering according to prescribed guidelines and TAT.

Results: After PDSA 2, test ordering improved significantly to more than 90% of relevant tests being initiated at AML diagnosis; and TAT was reduced by 27.6% for NGS and by 54.8% for NPM1 PCR. After PDSA 3, TAT for NGS was overall reduced by 63.3% to 11.4 days and within our 14-day target. We were able to also meet our target TAT of 5 days or less for FLT3 and NPM1 PCRs.

Discussion: A multidisciplinary approach with shared decision making between hematologists and laboratory practitioners was essential in the development of an algorithm for reflex testing in AML that resulted in improved test ordering and TAT.

目的:AML的分类和治疗选择现在主要是由基因定义的亚型驱动的。治疗的个性化依赖于及时完成和报告细胞遗传学和分子测试,这给临床实践带来了挑战。我们发起了一项质量改进研究,目的是优化基因组诊断测试的订购过程,并减少测试周转时间(tat)。方法:成立了一个由血液学家、实验室科学家、技术专家和血液病理学家组成的多学科工作组,并确定了以下检测方法对于75岁以下AML患者的加速检测是必要的:下一代测序(NGS)髓系面板、核型分析、FLT3 PCR、NPM1 PCR、CBFB::MYH11 PCR、RUNX1::RUNX1T1 PCR,提出了一种反射性流式细胞术触发的新诊断AML (ND-AML)基因组诊断检测算法。我们使用改进模型并实施了三个计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)周期:ND-AML管理的教育和指南,ND-AML反射实验室触发诊断测试算法的实施,以及NGS工作流程的自动化。我们根据规定的指导方针和TAT评估测试订单的合规性。结果:在PDSA 2后,检测顺序明显改善,在AML诊断时启动相关检测的比例超过90%;NGS和NPM1 PCR的TAT分别降低了27.6%和54.8%。在PDSA 3之后,NGS的TAT总体上减少了63.3%至11.4天,达到了我们14天的目标。对于FLT3和NPM1 pcr,我们也能够达到5天或更短的目标TAT。讨论:血液学家和实验室从业人员共同决策的多学科方法对于AML反射测试算法的开发至关重要,从而改善了测试顺序和TAT。
{"title":"Patient-Centered Genomic Diagnostic Testing for AML: A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Jenny M Ho, Uday Deotare, Aatif Qureshi, Laila Schenkel, Benjamin Chin-Yee, Anahita Mohseni Meybodi, Emilie Lalonde, Lalit Saini, Alan Gob, Selay Lam, Cyrus Hsia, Bekim Sadikovic, Benjamin Hedley, Ian Chin-Yee","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00776","DOIUrl":"10.1200/OP-24-00776","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The classification of AML and therapeutic options are now largely driven by genetically defined subtypes. Personalization of treatment relies on timely completion and reporting of cytogenetic and molecular tests, creating challenges in clinical practice. We initiated a quality improvement study with the aim to optimize the process for ordering of genomic diagnostic tests and to reduce test turnaround times (TATs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary working group consisting of hematologists, laboratory scientists, technologists, and hematopathologists was formed and identified the following tests as necessary for expedited testing in patients with AML younger than 75 years: next-generation sequencing (NGS) myeloid panel, karyotype analysis, <i>FLT3</i> PCR, <i>NPM1</i> PCR, <i>CBFB::MYH11</i> PCR, and <i>RUNX1::RUNX1T1</i> PCR, and proposed a reflexive flow cytometry-triggered genomic diagnostic testing algorithm for newly diagnosed AML (ND-AML). We used the model of improvement and implemented three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles: education and guidelines for management of ND-AML, implementation of the reflex laboratory-triggered diagnostic testing algorithm for ND-AML, and automation of NGS workflow. We assessed compliance with test ordering according to prescribed guidelines and TAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PDSA 2, test ordering improved significantly to more than 90% of relevant tests being initiated at AML diagnosis; and TAT was reduced by 27.6% for NGS and by 54.8% for <i>NPM1</i> PCR. After PDSA 3, TAT for NGS was overall reduced by 63.3% to 11.4 days and within our 14-day target. We were able to also meet our target TAT of 5 days or less for <i>FLT3</i> and <i>NPM1</i> PCRs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A multidisciplinary approach with shared decision making between hematologists and laboratory practitioners was essential in the development of an algorithm for reflex testing in AML that resulted in improved test ordering and TAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"314-324"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144215816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shared Decision Making Can-and Should-Actively Involve Family Caregivers. 共同决策可以而且应该让家庭照顾者积极参与。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1200/OP-25-00340
Karina Dahl Steffensen, Leonard Berry
{"title":"Shared Decision Making Can-and Should-Actively Involve Family Caregivers.","authors":"Karina Dahl Steffensen, Leonard Berry","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00340","DOIUrl":"10.1200/OP-25-00340","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"185-188"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144846535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment Patterns of Goserelin 3.6 mg Once Every 4 Weeks and 10.8 mg Once Every 12 Weeks in Women With Breast Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Patients in the United States. 乳腺癌患者使用戈舍雷林3.6 mg每4周一次和10.8 mg每12周一次的治疗模式:对美国患者的真实世界分析。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1200/OP-24-00655
Kelly E McCann, Virginia Kaklamani, Noran Osman, Joan Cannon, Lonnie Brent, Rachel Lucia, Chong Li, Nicole Duran, Sidharth Gupta, Nancy Martin

Purpose: Goserelin is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for ovarian function suppression in the treatment of pre- and perimenopausal patients with breast cancer and for the preservation of ovarian function during chemotherapy. Goserelin is available in doses of 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks or 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks. This study used US real-world evidence to characterize goserelin treatment patterns.

Methods: Electronic health record data of adults with a history of breast cancer and ≥2 goserelin prescriptions between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, were identified through TriNetX. Patient demographics and treatment patterns were examined.

Results: Overall, 3,620 US patients were identified: 2,870 treated with goserelin 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks, 410 treated with 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks, and 340 switched from 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks to 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks. Peak utilization of 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks (36.6%) and dose switching to 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks (26.5%) occurred in 2020. Patients who switched to 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks had the longest median treatment duration (776 days), compared with the 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks and 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks cohorts (264 and 429 days, respectively). Of patients who switched, 65% were still being treated after 2 years, compared with 30% and 40% treated with 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks only or 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks only, respectively. Patients initially treated with or who switched to 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks were more adherent (64.4%-75.0%), compared with patients treated with 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks (45.4%).

Conclusion: Treatment with goserelin 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks is associated with greater adherence and longer treatment duration, compared with 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with breast cancer in the United States.

目的:戈舍林是一种促性腺激素释放激素激动剂,用于抑制绝经前和围绝经期乳腺癌患者的卵巢功能,并在化疗期间保留卵巢功能。戈舍瑞林的剂量为每4周一次3.6毫克或每12周一次10.8毫克。本研究使用美国真实世界的证据来表征戈舍雷林的治疗模式。方法:通过TriNetX识别2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间有乳腺癌病史且处方戈瑟雷林≥2次的成人电子健康记录数据。检查患者人口统计和治疗模式。结果:总体而言,3620名美国患者被确定:2870名患者接受每4周3.6 mg一次的戈舍雷林治疗,410名患者接受每12周10.8 mg一次的戈舍雷林治疗,340名患者从每4周3.6 mg一次切换到每12周10.8 mg一次。使用10.8 mg / 12周1次(36.6%)的峰值发生在2020年,剂量转换为10.8 mg / 12周1次(26.5%)。与3.6 mg每4周一次和10.8 mg每12周一次的队列(分别为264天和429天)相比,每12周一次转换为10.8 mg的患者的中位治疗持续时间最长(776天)。在转换的患者中,65%的患者在2年后仍在接受治疗,相比之下,30%和40%的患者分别接受3.6 mg每4周一次或10.8 mg每12周一次的治疗。与每4周治疗3.6 mg的患者(45.4%)相比,最初接受治疗或改为每12周治疗10.8 mg的患者的依从性更高(64.4%-75.0%)。结论:与美国乳腺癌患者每4周服用3.6 mg戈舍雷林相比,每12周服用10.8 mg戈舍雷林治疗依从性更强,治疗持续时间更长。
{"title":"Treatment Patterns of Goserelin 3.6 mg Once Every 4 Weeks and 10.8 mg Once Every 12 Weeks in Women With Breast Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Patients in the United States.","authors":"Kelly E McCann, Virginia Kaklamani, Noran Osman, Joan Cannon, Lonnie Brent, Rachel Lucia, Chong Li, Nicole Duran, Sidharth Gupta, Nancy Martin","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00655","DOIUrl":"10.1200/OP-24-00655","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Goserelin is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for ovarian function suppression in the treatment of pre- and perimenopausal patients with breast cancer and for the preservation of ovarian function during chemotherapy. Goserelin is available in doses of 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks or 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks. This study used US real-world evidence to characterize goserelin treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic health record data of adults with a history of breast cancer and ≥2 goserelin prescriptions between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, were identified through TriNetX. Patient demographics and treatment patterns were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3,620 US patients were identified: 2,870 treated with goserelin 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks, 410 treated with 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks, and 340 switched from 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks to 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks. Peak utilization of 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks (36.6%) and dose switching to 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks (26.5%) occurred in 2020. Patients who switched to 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks had the longest median treatment duration (776 days), compared with the 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks and 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks cohorts (264 and 429 days, respectively). Of patients who switched, 65% were still being treated after 2 years, compared with 30% and 40% treated with 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks only or 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks only, respectively. Patients initially treated with or who switched to 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks were more adherent (64.4%-75.0%), compared with patients treated with 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks (45.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with goserelin 10.8 mg once every 12 weeks is associated with greater adherence and longer treatment duration, compared with 3.6 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with breast cancer in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"263-273"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144119771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Integration of Outpatient Palliative Care Among Adults With Advanced Cancer in a Safety-Net Health System: A Patterns of Care Analysis. 早期整合门诊姑息治疗成人晚期癌症在安全网卫生系统:护理模式分析。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1200/OP-24-00892
Lisa DiMartino, Vincent Merrill, Celette Sugg Skinner, Timothy P Hogan, Navid Sadeghi, Alva Roche-Green, Winnie Wang, Arthur S Hong

Purpose: Little is known about guideline-concordant, early integration of palliative care (PC) in the outpatient setting among patients with advanced cancer within a safety-net system. This study examined PC delivery patterns for patients seen in a large, urban safety-net system.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with advanced-stage solid tumor and who had ≥1 outpatient oncology visit from January 2018 to July 2023 at Parkland Health were identified via electronic health record. Outcomes assessed included (1) receipt of PC referral ≤8 weeks after diagnosis, (2) receipt of any PC referral, and (3) PC visit completion. Multivariable logit models evaluated associations between key characteristics (age, race/ethnicity, gender, cancer type, preferred language, insurance, diagnosis year) and the outcomes.

Results: Among 1,296 patients (44% female; 76% non-White), 55% received a referral. Of those referred, 46% patients were referred early (≤8 weeks). Two thirds of the referred patients completed a PC visit during the study period. In adjusted regression models, patients who were Black (v White; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82]), Hispanic (aOR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.59]), or had prostate cancer (v breast cancer; aOR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.69]) had lower odds of receiving early referral. Ages 40-69 (v >80 years; lowest odds for 60 to <70, aOR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.85]) and patients with gynecologic cancer (aOR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.28]) had lower odds of receiving any PC referral. Females had higher odds of completing a PC visit (v males; aOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.08]).

Conclusion: Many patients did not receive an outpatient referral or received it late. Observed differences by race/ethnicity, cancer type, and age suggest the need for different interventions targeting PC delivery for underserved patients with cancer.

目的:在安全网络系统的晚期癌症患者门诊设置中,对指南一致的早期姑息治疗(PC)知之甚少。这项研究检查了在大型城市安全网系统中看到的患者的PC交付模式。方法:通过电子健康记录识别2018年1月至2023年7月在Parkland Health就诊≥1次的晚期实体瘤患者。评估的结果包括:(1)诊断后≤8周收到PC转诊,(2)收到任何PC转诊,(3)完成PC就诊。多变量logit模型评估关键特征(年龄、种族/民族、性别、癌症类型、首选语言、保险、诊断年份)与结果之间的关联。结果:1296例患者中,女性占44%;76%是非白人),55%接受了推荐。在这些患者中,46%的患者是早期(≤8周)转诊的。三分之二的转诊患者在研究期间完成了PC访问。在调整后的回归模型中,黑人(vs白人;调整优势比[aOR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.33至0.82]),西班牙裔(aOR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18至0.59]),或患有前列腺癌(v乳腺癌;aOR为0.27 [95% CI, 0.10至0.69])的患者接受早期转诊的几率较低。年龄40-69岁(50 - 80岁);60岁至5岁男性的最低几率;aOR为1.45 [95% CI, 1.01 ~ 2.08])。结论:许多患者未接受门诊转诊或转诊较晚。观察到的种族/民族、癌症类型和年龄的差异表明,需要针对服务不足的癌症患者提供不同的PC干预措施。
{"title":"Early Integration of Outpatient Palliative Care Among Adults With Advanced Cancer in a Safety-Net Health System: A Patterns of Care Analysis.","authors":"Lisa DiMartino, Vincent Merrill, Celette Sugg Skinner, Timothy P Hogan, Navid Sadeghi, Alva Roche-Green, Winnie Wang, Arthur S Hong","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00892","DOIUrl":"10.1200/OP-24-00892","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Little is known about guideline-concordant, early integration of palliative care (PC) in the outpatient setting among patients with advanced cancer within a safety-net system. This study examined PC delivery patterns for patients seen in a large, urban safety-net system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with advanced-stage solid tumor and who had ≥1 outpatient oncology visit from January 2018 to July 2023 at Parkland Health were identified via electronic health record. Outcomes assessed included (1) receipt of PC referral ≤8 weeks after diagnosis, (2) receipt of any PC referral, and (3) PC visit completion. Multivariable logit models evaluated associations between key characteristics (age, race/ethnicity, gender, cancer type, preferred language, insurance, diagnosis year) and the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,296 patients (44% female; 76% non-White), 55% received a referral. Of those referred, 46% patients were referred early (≤8 weeks). Two thirds of the referred patients completed a PC visit during the study period. In adjusted regression models, patients who were Black (<i>v</i> White; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82]), Hispanic (aOR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.59]), or had prostate cancer (<i>v</i> breast cancer; aOR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.69]) had lower odds of receiving early referral. Ages 40-69 (<i>v</i> >80 years; lowest odds for 60 to <70, aOR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.85]) and patients with gynecologic cancer (aOR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.28]) had lower odds of receiving any PC referral. Females had higher odds of completing a PC visit (<i>v</i> males; aOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.08]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many patients did not receive an outpatient referral or received it late. Observed differences by race/ethnicity, cancer type, and age suggest the need for different interventions targeting PC delivery for underserved patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401141/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144078024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JCO oncology practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1