JCO oncology practice最新文献

In this editorial accompanying manuscript the by Klatte and colleagues, Drs Singh, and Nipp review the data behind universal germline testing in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and review possible reasons for and solutions continued inadequate rates of germline testing in our community. Making germline testing for all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is critical and will require cross-disciplinary collaboration and innovation.

Purpose: Patients living in rural communities have greater barriers to cancer care and poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that rural patients with prostate cancer have less access and receive different treatments compared with urban patients.

Methods: We used a population-based prospective cohort, the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study, to compare differences in prostate cancer diagnosis, access to care, and treatment in patients by geographic residence. The 2013 rural-urban continuum code (RUCC) was used to determine urban (RUCC 1-3) versus rural (RUCC 4-9) location of residence.

Results: Patients with rural residence comprised 25% of the cohort (364 of 1,444); they were less likely to be White race and had lower income and educational attainment. Rural patients were more likely to have <12 cores on biopsy (47.1% v 35.7%; P < .001) and less likely (40.8% v 47.6%; P = .04) to receive multidisciplinary consultation. We observed significant differences in treatment between urban and rural patients, including rural patients receiving less active surveillance or observation (22.6% v 28.7%), especially in low-risk cancer (33.2% v 40.7%). On multivariable analysis that adjusted for patient and diagnostic factors, rural residence was associated with less use of active surveillance or observation over radical treatment (ie, surgery or radiation therapy; odds ratio, 0.49 v urban; P < .001) in patients with low-risk cancer.

Conclusion: Patients with prostate cancer who live in rural versus urban areas experience several differences in care that are likely clinically meaningful, including fewer cores in the diagnostic biopsy, less utilization of multidisciplinary consultation, less use of active surveillance, or observation for low-risk disease. Future studies are needed to assess the efficacy of interventions in mitigating these disparities.

Purpose: H. pylori eradication therapy (HPE) can lead to tumor regression in H. pylori-positive (HPP) gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. However, some patients do not have detectable H. pylori (HP) infection (H. pylori-negative [HPN]) and the guidelines differ in their initial approach to HPN patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends proceeding to radiation therapy, whereas European Society for Medical Oncology suggests HPE for every patient, even those who are HPN. To address this issue, we evaluated the effectiveness of HPE in limited-stage gastric MALT lymphoma.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients newly diagnosed with stage IE gastric MALT lymphoma between January 2002 and December 2022. The primary outcome was the complete remission (CR) rate defined as no macroscopic findings of lymphoma and negative gastric biopsy at the follow-up gastric endoscopy.

Results: Fifty-two patients were reviewed, and HP infection was detected in 19 (36.5%) patients-14 by immunostaining, three by serology, and one each by stool antigen and urea breath test. All 19 HPP and eight of the 33 HPN patients received HPE treatment. The CR rate was 63% (12/19) in HPP patients and 13% (1/8) in HPN patients (P = .033). After a median follow-up of 89.7 months, only two of the 12 HPP patients achieving CR have relapsed; the one HPN patient who received HPE remains in CR at 12+ months.

Conclusion: For limited-stage HPP gastric MALT lymphoma, HPE is an effective and durable first-line treatment and should be used. For HPN patients, the CR rate with HPE is very low in our experience and is thus in support of the NCCN guideline.

Purpose: To examine the relationship between guideline-concordant care (GCC) on the basis of national clinical practice guidelines and survival in children (0-14 years), adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years), and adults (40 years and older) with osteosarcoma, and to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with receipt of GCC and survival.

Methods: We used data from the California Cancer Registry (CCR) on patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma during 2004-2019, with detailed treatment information extracted from the CCR text fields, including chemotherapy regimens. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression were used for statistical analyses.

Results: Of 1,716 patients, only 47% received GCC, with variation by age at diagnosis: 67% of children, 43% of AYAs, and 30% of adults. In multivariable models, patients who received part or all care (v none) at specialized cancer centers were more likely to receive GCC. AYAs and adults were less likely to receive GCC than children (odds ratio [OR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50] and OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.56], respectively). In a model excluding adults, patients treated by pediatric (v medical) oncologists were more likely to receive GCC (OR, 3.44 [95% CI, 2.40 to 4.94]). Patients with metastatic osteosarcoma at diagnosis who did not receive GCC had a greater hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR], 2.02 [95% CI, 1.55 to 2.63]) but no statistical differences were found in those diagnosed at earlier stages (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.43]).

Conclusion: GCC was associated with improved survival in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma in California. However, we found disparities in the delivery of GCC, highlighting the need for target interventions to improve delivery of GCC in this patient population.

@ramsedhom and colleagues highlight the opportunity of palliative care to bend the cost (and value) curve in cancer. Enhanced, early, and expanded access to PC offers benefits to inpatients with cancer and cost savings to health systems and payors.