Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4183
Rodney H Breau, Luke T Lavallée, Ilias Cagiannos, Franco Momoli, Gregory L Bryson, Salmaan Kanji, Christopher Morash, Alexis F Turgeon, Ryan Zarychanski, Brett L Houston, Daniel I McIsaac, Ranjeeta Mallick, Greg A Knoll, Girish Kulkarni, Jonathan Izawa, Fred Saad, Wassim Kassouf, Vincent Fradet, Ricardo Rendon, Bobby Shayegan, Adrian Fairey, Darrel E Drachenberg, Dean Fergusson
Importance: Among cancer surgeries, patients requiring open radical cystectomy have the highest risk of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss during cardiac and orthopedic surgery, and it is possible that similar effects of TXA would be observed during radical cystectomy.
Objective: To determine whether TXA, administered before incision and for the duration of radical cystectomy, reduced the number of RBC transfusions received by patients up to 30 days after surgery.
Design, setting, and participants: The Tranexamic Acid During Cystectomy Trial (TACT) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial with enrollment between June 2013 and January 2021. This multicenter trial was conducted in 10 academic centers. A consecutive sample of patients was eligible if the patients had a planned open radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer.
Intervention: Before incision, patients in the intervention arm received a loading dose of intravenous TXA, 10 mg/kg, followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 mg/kg per hour for the duration of the surgery. In the control arm, patients received indistinguishable matching placebo.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was receipt of RBC transfusion up to 30 days after surgery.
Results: A total of 386 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 33 did not meet eligibility. Of 353 randomized patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-75] years; 263 male [74.5%]), 344 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. RBC transfusion up to 30 days occurred in 64 of 173 patients (37.0%) in the TXA group and 64 of 171 patients (37.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.18). There were no differences in secondary outcomes among the TXA group vs placebo group including mean (SD) number of RBC units transfused (0.9 [1.5] U vs 1.1 [1.8] U; P = .43), estimated blood loss (927 [733] mL vs 963 [624] mL; P = .52), intraoperative transfusion (28.3% [49 of 173] vs 24.0% [41 of 171]; P = .08), or venous thromboembolic events (3.5% [6 of 173] vs 2.9% [5 of 171]; P = .57). Non-transfusion-related adverse events were similar between groups.
Conclusions and relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial reveal that TXA did not reduce blood transfusion in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Based on this trial, routine use of TXA during open radical cystectomy is not recommended.
重要性:在癌症手术中,需要进行开放性根治性膀胱切除术的患者输注红细胞(RBC)的风险最高。预防性氨甲环酸(TXA)可减少心脏和骨科手术中的失血量,在根治性膀胱切除术中也可能观察到类似的效果:目的:确定在根治性膀胱切除术切口前和手术期间使用氨甲环酸(TXA)是否能减少患者术后 30 天内输注红细胞的次数:膀胱切除术期间氨甲环酸试验(TACT)是一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验,入组时间为2013年6月至2021年1月。这项多中心试验在 10 个学术中心进行。如果患者为治疗膀胱癌而计划进行开放性根治性膀胱切除术,则符合条件的患者均为连续样本:切口前,干预组患者接受 10 mg/kg 负荷剂量的静脉 TXA,随后在手术期间每小时输注 5 mg/kg。对照组患者接受无差别的匹配安慰剂:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是术后 30 天内接受红细胞输注的情况:共有 386 名患者接受了资格评估,33 人不符合资格。在353名随机患者(中位数[IQR]年龄为69[62-75]岁;263名男性[74.5%])中,344名患者被纳入意向治疗分析。TXA组173例患者中有64例(37.0%)在30天内输注了红细胞,安慰剂组171例患者中有64例(37.4%)在30天内输注了红细胞(相对风险为0.99;95% CI为0.83-1.18)。TXA组与安慰剂组的次要结果无差异,包括平均(标清)输注的红细胞单位数(0.9 [1.5] U vs 1.1 [1.8] U;P = .43)、估计失血量(927 [733] mL vs 963 [624] mL;P = .52)、术中输血(28.3% [173例中的49例] vs 24.0% [171例中的41例];P = .08)或静脉血栓栓塞事件(3.5% [173例中的6例] vs 2.9% [171例中的5例];P = .57)。各组间非输血相关不良事件相似:这项随机临床试验的结果表明,TXA 并未减少膀胱癌开放根治性膀胱切除术患者的输血量。根据这项试验,不建议在开放性根治性膀胱切除术中常规使用TXA:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01869413。
{"title":"Tranexamic Acid During Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Rodney H Breau, Luke T Lavallée, Ilias Cagiannos, Franco Momoli, Gregory L Bryson, Salmaan Kanji, Christopher Morash, Alexis F Turgeon, Ryan Zarychanski, Brett L Houston, Daniel I McIsaac, Ranjeeta Mallick, Greg A Knoll, Girish Kulkarni, Jonathan Izawa, Fred Saad, Wassim Kassouf, Vincent Fradet, Ricardo Rendon, Bobby Shayegan, Adrian Fairey, Darrel E Drachenberg, Dean Fergusson","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4183","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Among cancer surgeries, patients requiring open radical cystectomy have the highest risk of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss during cardiac and orthopedic surgery, and it is possible that similar effects of TXA would be observed during radical cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether TXA, administered before incision and for the duration of radical cystectomy, reduced the number of RBC transfusions received by patients up to 30 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Tranexamic Acid During Cystectomy Trial (TACT) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial with enrollment between June 2013 and January 2021. This multicenter trial was conducted in 10 academic centers. A consecutive sample of patients was eligible if the patients had a planned open radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Before incision, patients in the intervention arm received a loading dose of intravenous TXA, 10 mg/kg, followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 mg/kg per hour for the duration of the surgery. In the control arm, patients received indistinguishable matching placebo.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was receipt of RBC transfusion up to 30 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 33 did not meet eligibility. Of 353 randomized patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-75] years; 263 male [74.5%]), 344 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. RBC transfusion up to 30 days occurred in 64 of 173 patients (37.0%) in the TXA group and 64 of 171 patients (37.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.18). There were no differences in secondary outcomes among the TXA group vs placebo group including mean (SD) number of RBC units transfused (0.9 [1.5] U vs 1.1 [1.8] U; P = .43), estimated blood loss (927 [733] mL vs 963 [624] mL; P = .52), intraoperative transfusion (28.3% [49 of 173] vs 24.0% [41 of 171]; P = .08), or venous thromboembolic events (3.5% [6 of 173] vs 2.9% [5 of 171]; P = .57). Non-transfusion-related adverse events were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this randomized clinical trial reveal that TXA did not reduce blood transfusion in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Based on this trial, routine use of TXA during open radical cystectomy is not recommended.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01869413.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1355-1363"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447623/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4204
Michael A Jacobs, Susanne Schmidt, Daniel E Hall
{"title":"Choosing the Right Neighborhood Deprivation Index.","authors":"Michael A Jacobs, Susanne Schmidt, Daniel E Hall","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4204","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4204","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1414"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4195
Kimberly A Rollings, Grace A Noppert, Jennifer J Griggs, Andrew M Ibrahim, Philippa J Clarke
Importance: Health care researchers, professionals, payers, and policymakers are increasingly relying on publicly available composite indices of area-level socioeconomic deprivation to address health equity. Implications of index selection, however, are not well understood.
Objective: To compare the performance of 2 frequently used deprivation indices using policy-relevant outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing 3 common surgical procedures.
Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study examined outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries (65 to 99 years old) undergoing 1 of 3 common surgical procedures (hip replacement, knee replacement, or coronary artery bypass grafting) between 2016 and 2019. Index discriminative performance was compared for beneficiaries residing in tracts with high- and low-deprivation levels (deciles) according to each index. Analyses were conducted between December 2022 and August 2023.
Main outcomes and measures: Tract-level deprivation was operationalized using 2020 releases of the area deprivation index (ADI) and the social vulnerability index (SVI). Binary outcomes were unplanned surgery, 30-day readmissions, and 30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by each index, accounted for beneficiary and hospital characteristics.
Results: A total of 2 433 603 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 73.8 [6.1] years; 1 412 968 female beneficiaries [58.1%]; 24 165 Asian [1.0%], 158 582 Black [6.5%], and 2 182 052 White [89.7%]) were included in analyses. According to both indices, beneficiaries residing in high-deprivation tracts had significantly greater adjusted odds of all outcomes for all procedures when compared with beneficiaries living in low-deprivation tracts. However, compared to ADI, SVI resulted in higher adjusted odds ratios (adjusted odds ratios, 1.17-1.31 for SVI vs 1.09-1.23 for ADI), significantly larger outcome rate differences (outcome rate difference, 0.07%-5.17% for SVI vs outcome rate difference, 0.05%-2.44% for ADI; 95% CIs excluded 0), and greater effect sizes (Cohen d, 0.076-0.546 for SVI vs 0.044-0.304 for ADI) for beneficiaries residing in high- vs low-deprivation tracts.
Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries, SVI had significantly better discriminative performance-stratifying surgical outcomes over a wider range-than ADI for identifying and distinguishing between high- and low-deprivation tracts, as indexed by outcomes for common surgical procedures. Index selection requires careful consideration of index differences, index performance, and contextual factors surrounding use, especially when informing resource allocation and health care payment adjustment models to address health equity.
{"title":"Comparing Deprivation vs Vulnerability Index Performance Using Medicare Beneficiary Surgical Outcomes.","authors":"Kimberly A Rollings, Grace A Noppert, Jennifer J Griggs, Andrew M Ibrahim, Philippa J Clarke","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4195","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Health care researchers, professionals, payers, and policymakers are increasingly relying on publicly available composite indices of area-level socioeconomic deprivation to address health equity. Implications of index selection, however, are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the performance of 2 frequently used deprivation indices using policy-relevant outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing 3 common surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries (65 to 99 years old) undergoing 1 of 3 common surgical procedures (hip replacement, knee replacement, or coronary artery bypass grafting) between 2016 and 2019. Index discriminative performance was compared for beneficiaries residing in tracts with high- and low-deprivation levels (deciles) according to each index. Analyses were conducted between December 2022 and August 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Tract-level deprivation was operationalized using 2020 releases of the area deprivation index (ADI) and the social vulnerability index (SVI). Binary outcomes were unplanned surgery, 30-day readmissions, and 30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by each index, accounted for beneficiary and hospital characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2 433 603 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 73.8 [6.1] years; 1 412 968 female beneficiaries [58.1%]; 24 165 Asian [1.0%], 158 582 Black [6.5%], and 2 182 052 White [89.7%]) were included in analyses. According to both indices, beneficiaries residing in high-deprivation tracts had significantly greater adjusted odds of all outcomes for all procedures when compared with beneficiaries living in low-deprivation tracts. However, compared to ADI, SVI resulted in higher adjusted odds ratios (adjusted odds ratios, 1.17-1.31 for SVI vs 1.09-1.23 for ADI), significantly larger outcome rate differences (outcome rate difference, 0.07%-5.17% for SVI vs outcome rate difference, 0.05%-2.44% for ADI; 95% CIs excluded 0), and greater effect sizes (Cohen d, 0.076-0.546 for SVI vs 0.044-0.304 for ADI) for beneficiaries residing in high- vs low-deprivation tracts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries, SVI had significantly better discriminative performance-stratifying surgical outcomes over a wider range-than ADI for identifying and distinguishing between high- and low-deprivation tracts, as indexed by outcomes for common surgical procedures. Index selection requires careful consideration of index differences, index performance, and contextual factors surrounding use, especially when informing resource allocation and health care payment adjustment models to address health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1404-1413"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447624/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5228
Max R Coffey, Kyle E Lambert, Vivian E Strong
{"title":"Refrain From the Drain? The ADIGE Trial Brings Gastrectomy to the Debate.","authors":"Max R Coffey, Kyle E Lambert, Vivian E Strong","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5228","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142728808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5227
Jacopo Weindelmayer, Valentina Mengardo, Filippo Ascari, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Riccardo Casadei, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Stefano De Pascale, Ugo Elmore, Giovanni Carlo Ferrari, Massimo Framarini, Roberta Gelmini, Monica Gualtierotti, Federico Marchesi, Marco Milone, Lucia Puca, Rossella Reddavid, Riccardo Rosati, Leonardo Solaini, Lorena Torroni, Luigi Totaro, Alessandro Veltri, Giuseppe Verlato, Giovanni de Manzoni
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Evidence suggests that prophylactic abdominal drainage after gastrectomy for cancer may reduce postoperative morbidity and hospital stay but this evidence comes from small studies with a high risk of bias. Further research is needed to determine whether drains safely meet their primary purpose of identifying and managing postoperative intraperitoneal collections without the need for reoperation or additional percutaneous drainage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether avoiding routine abdominal drainage increased postoperative invasive procedures.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADIGE) Trial was a multicenter prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Enrollment spanned from December 2019 to January 2023. Follow-up evaluations were completed at 30 and 90 days. Eleven centers within the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer, encompassing both academic medical centers and community hospitals, were included. Patients with gastric cancer undergoing subtotal or total gastrectomy with curative intent were eligible, excluding those younger than 18 years, with serious comorbidities, or undergoing procedure types outside the scope of the study. Of 803 patients assessed for eligibility, 404 were randomized and 390 were included in final analyses.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized 1:1 into prophylactic drain or no drain arms.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis measuring reoperation or percutaneous drainage within 30 postoperative days. The null hypothesis was rejected when the 90% CI upper limit of the proportion difference did not exceed 3.56%. The calculated sample size to achieve 80% power with a 10% dropout rate was 404 patients (202 in each group). Surgeons and patients were blinded until gastrointestinal reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 404 patients randomized 226 (57.8%) were male; the median (IQR) age was 71 (62-78) years. Intraoperative identification of nonresectable disease occurred in 14 patients, leading to their exclusion from the study, leaving 390 patients. In the mITT analysis, 15 patients (7.7%) in the drain group needed reoperation or percutaneous drainage by postoperative day 30 vs 29 (15%) in the no drain group, favoring the drain group (difference, 7.2%; 90% CI, 2.1-12.4; P = .02). Of note, the difference in the primary composite end point was entirely due to a similar difference in reoperation (5.1% in the drain group vs 12.4% in the no drain group; P = .01). Drain-related complications occurred in 4 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that refraining from prophylactic drain use after gastrectomy heightened the risk of postoperative invasive procedures, discouraging its avoidance. Future studies identifying high-risk groups
{"title":"Prophylactic Drain Placement and Postoperative Invasive Procedures After Gastrectomy: The Abdominal Drain After Gastrectomy (ADIGE) Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Jacopo Weindelmayer, Valentina Mengardo, Filippo Ascari, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Riccardo Casadei, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Stefano De Pascale, Ugo Elmore, Giovanni Carlo Ferrari, Massimo Framarini, Roberta Gelmini, Monica Gualtierotti, Federico Marchesi, Marco Milone, Lucia Puca, Rossella Reddavid, Riccardo Rosati, Leonardo Solaini, Lorena Torroni, Luigi Totaro, Alessandro Veltri, Giuseppe Verlato, Giovanni de Manzoni","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Evidence suggests that prophylactic abdominal drainage after gastrectomy for cancer may reduce postoperative morbidity and hospital stay but this evidence comes from small studies with a high risk of bias. Further research is needed to determine whether drains safely meet their primary purpose of identifying and managing postoperative intraperitoneal collections without the need for reoperation or additional percutaneous drainage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether avoiding routine abdominal drainage increased postoperative invasive procedures.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADIGE) Trial was a multicenter prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Enrollment spanned from December 2019 to January 2023. Follow-up evaluations were completed at 30 and 90 days. Eleven centers within the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer, encompassing both academic medical centers and community hospitals, were included. Patients with gastric cancer undergoing subtotal or total gastrectomy with curative intent were eligible, excluding those younger than 18 years, with serious comorbidities, or undergoing procedure types outside the scope of the study. Of 803 patients assessed for eligibility, 404 were randomized and 390 were included in final analyses.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized 1:1 into prophylactic drain or no drain arms.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis measuring reoperation or percutaneous drainage within 30 postoperative days. The null hypothesis was rejected when the 90% CI upper limit of the proportion difference did not exceed 3.56%. The calculated sample size to achieve 80% power with a 10% dropout rate was 404 patients (202 in each group). Surgeons and patients were blinded until gastrointestinal reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 404 patients randomized 226 (57.8%) were male; the median (IQR) age was 71 (62-78) years. Intraoperative identification of nonresectable disease occurred in 14 patients, leading to their exclusion from the study, leaving 390 patients. In the mITT analysis, 15 patients (7.7%) in the drain group needed reoperation or percutaneous drainage by postoperative day 30 vs 29 (15%) in the no drain group, favoring the drain group (difference, 7.2%; 90% CI, 2.1-12.4; P = .02). Of note, the difference in the primary composite end point was entirely due to a similar difference in reoperation (5.1% in the drain group vs 12.4% in the no drain group; P = .01). Drain-related complications occurred in 4 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that refraining from prophylactic drain use after gastrectomy heightened the risk of postoperative invasive procedures, discouraging its avoidance. Future studies identifying high-risk groups ","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142728793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4949
Maria Bernadette Majella Doyle, Ola Ahmed, Susan L Orloff
{"title":"Issues With the New Liver Allocation System.","authors":"Maria Bernadette Majella Doyle, Ola Ahmed, Susan L Orloff","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4949","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142728789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4893
Ernest E Moore, Michael Curi, Nicholas Namias, Rishi Kundi, Ying Wei Lum, Charles J Fox, Ravi R Rajani, Todd E Rasmussen, Oleksandr Sokolov, Laura E Niklason, Zakaria Khondker, Shamik J Parikh
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Vascular injuries require urgent repair to minimize loss of limb and life. Standard revascularization relies on autologous vein or synthetic grafts, but alternative options are needed when adequate vein is not feasible and when clinical conditions preclude safe use of synthetic materials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the acellular tissue engineered vessel (ATEV) in the repair of arterial injuries.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Two open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized clinical trials, including 1 prospective civilian study (CLN-PRO-V005 [V005]) and 1 retrospective observational study in a war zone (CLN-PRO-V017 [V017]), were conducted from September 2018 to January 2024 (follow-up ongoing) at 19 level 1 trauma centers in the US and Israel and 5 frontline hospitals in Ukraine. Patients had vascular injury, no autologous vein available for emergent revascularization, and risk factors for wound infection. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The ATEV is a bioengineered vascular conduit grown from human vascular cells, available off the shelf, and implantable without immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary patency at day 30 was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included limb salvage, graft infection, and patient survival. A systematic literature review identified synthetic graft benchmarks in the treatment of arterial trauma for the same end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The V005 and V017 studies evaluated 69 and 17 patients, respectively, and included 51 in V005 and 16 in V017 with noniatrogenic arterial injuries of the extremities. The majority were male (V005, 38 [74.5%]; V017, 16 [100%]), the mean (SD) ages were similar (V005, 33.5 [13.6] years; V017, 34.2 [9.0] years), and the mean (SD) Injury Severity Scores were similar (V005, 20.8 [10.5]; V017, 20.1 [18.9]). Penetrating injuries dominated (V005, 29 patients [56.9%]; V017, 14 patients [87.5%]). At day 30 for the V005 and V017 trials, respectively, ATEV primary patency was 84.3% (95% CI, 72.0%-91.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); secondary patency was 90.2% (95% CI, 79.0%-95.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); amputation rate was 9.8% (95% CI, 4.3%-21.0%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); ATEV infection rate was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.4%-10.3%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); and death rate was 5.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-15.9%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%) (no deaths attributed to the ATEV). Day 30 synthetic graft benchmarks were as follows: secondary patency, 78.9%; amputation, 24.3%; infection, 8.4%; and death, 3.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of 2 single-arm trials in civilian and real-world military settings suggest that the ATEV provides benefits in terms of patency, limb salvage, and infection resistance. Comparing ATEV outcomes with synthetic graft benchmarks demonstrates im
{"title":"Bioengineered Human Arteries for the Repair of Vascular Injuries.","authors":"Ernest E Moore, Michael Curi, Nicholas Namias, Rishi Kundi, Ying Wei Lum, Charles J Fox, Ravi R Rajani, Todd E Rasmussen, Oleksandr Sokolov, Laura E Niklason, Zakaria Khondker, Shamik J Parikh","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4893","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4893","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Vascular injuries require urgent repair to minimize loss of limb and life. Standard revascularization relies on autologous vein or synthetic grafts, but alternative options are needed when adequate vein is not feasible and when clinical conditions preclude safe use of synthetic materials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the acellular tissue engineered vessel (ATEV) in the repair of arterial injuries.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Two open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized clinical trials, including 1 prospective civilian study (CLN-PRO-V005 [V005]) and 1 retrospective observational study in a war zone (CLN-PRO-V017 [V017]), were conducted from September 2018 to January 2024 (follow-up ongoing) at 19 level 1 trauma centers in the US and Israel and 5 frontline hospitals in Ukraine. Patients had vascular injury, no autologous vein available for emergent revascularization, and risk factors for wound infection. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The ATEV is a bioengineered vascular conduit grown from human vascular cells, available off the shelf, and implantable without immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary patency at day 30 was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included limb salvage, graft infection, and patient survival. A systematic literature review identified synthetic graft benchmarks in the treatment of arterial trauma for the same end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The V005 and V017 studies evaluated 69 and 17 patients, respectively, and included 51 in V005 and 16 in V017 with noniatrogenic arterial injuries of the extremities. The majority were male (V005, 38 [74.5%]; V017, 16 [100%]), the mean (SD) ages were similar (V005, 33.5 [13.6] years; V017, 34.2 [9.0] years), and the mean (SD) Injury Severity Scores were similar (V005, 20.8 [10.5]; V017, 20.1 [18.9]). Penetrating injuries dominated (V005, 29 patients [56.9%]; V017, 14 patients [87.5%]). At day 30 for the V005 and V017 trials, respectively, ATEV primary patency was 84.3% (95% CI, 72.0%-91.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); secondary patency was 90.2% (95% CI, 79.0%-95.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); amputation rate was 9.8% (95% CI, 4.3%-21.0%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); ATEV infection rate was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.4%-10.3%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); and death rate was 5.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-15.9%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%) (no deaths attributed to the ATEV). Day 30 synthetic graft benchmarks were as follows: secondary patency, 78.9%; amputation, 24.3%; infection, 8.4%; and death, 3.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of 2 single-arm trials in civilian and real-world military settings suggest that the ATEV provides benefits in terms of patency, limb salvage, and infection resistance. Comparing ATEV outcomes with synthetic graft benchmarks demonstrates im","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579887/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142675809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}