JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology最新文献

Objective: For early diagnosis and inquiry into the pathophysiology of Sjögren disease (SjD), salivary secretion and component levels, and salivary glands' uptakes in sialoscintigraphy were examined, in this cross-sectional study.

Methods: Patients who visited our hospital with suspected SjD between April 2016 and March 2020 were checked for unstimulated salivary secretion and β2-microglobulin, Na+, and cortisol levels in saliva. The patients who showed any abnormal salivary test results underwent sialoscintigraphy; the uptakes in the parotid, submandibular, and thyroid glands were compared using paired t test.

Results: Sixty-five patients (female/male 51/14, 64.5 ± 13.7 years) were checked for saliva. The secretion was 0.39 ± 0.43 mL/min. The component levels were 1.98 ± 1.45 mg/dL for β2-microglobulin (n = 61), 15.9 ± 15.3 mEq/L for Na+ (n = 61), and 0.20 ± 0.18 μg/dL for cortisol (n = 56). A significant negative correlation was observed between the secretion and each component level. A significant positive correlation was found between the 2 out of the 3 component levels. Sialoscintigraphy of 52 patients showed significantly lower uptake in the submandibular glands than in the parotid glands (submandibular/parotid ratio: 0.51 ± 0.36, left; 0.54 ± 0.39, right). The total uptake in the 4 salivary glands was lower, but not significantly, than that in the thyroid gland.

Conclusions: In patients with suspected SjD, a decreased salivary secretion correlated with a high level of any of β2-microglobulin, Na+, and cortisol; the 2 of the 3 levels correlated positively. Sialoscintigraphy showed that the submandibular glands were involved to a greater extent than the parotid glands were. The total salivary gland uptake may be lower than that in thyroid.

Objective: Being Mexico a very diverse developing country, the access to health care varies among geographical regions. We aimed to assess the differences in clinical features and treatment prescription in 3 regions of Mexico using data from the Mexican Adverse Events Registry (BIOBADAMEX).

Methods: We included all BIOBADAMEX patients from 2016 to 2023, compared the prescription patterns, the sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics between the northern (NR), central (CR), and southern regions (SR), and addressed the treatment survival by calculating hazards ratios (HRs).

Results: A total of 1084 patients were included: 389 (35.9%) from the NR, 569 (52.5%) from the CR, and 126 (11.6%) from the SR. The most common diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (61.0%). Patients from NR had longer disease duration (p = 0.03); those from SR had higher BMI (p < 0.001), DAS28 (p < 0.001), BASDAI scores (p = 0.02), and used more frequently glucocorticoids (p < 0.001). Patients from CR had more comorbidities (p = 0.001) and more regularly used conventional DMARDs (p = 0.007). Among patients with at least 2 assessments (n = 441), treatment with bDMARDs and tsDMARDs was discontinued in 247 (56%), 53% due to lack of efficacy. There was no association between the country region and treatment survival, but the main factors related to treatment discontinuation were disease duration (HR, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-0.9) and lack of response (HR, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.7).

Conclusions: In Mexico, patients with rheumatic diseases show regional differences in their clinical features and prescription patterns, which may be related to regional disparities in health care access and sociodemographic characteristics.

Background/objectives: Sarcopenia associates with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to determine prevalence and factors associated with sarcopenia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The HRQoL between RA patients with and without sarcopenia also was compared.

Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited RA patients, aged ≥20 years, at Chiang Mai University Hospital between May and November 2023. Their skeletal muscle mass (bioelectrical impedance analysis), grip strength (hand dynamometer), and physical performance (gait speed test) were evaluated. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Patient characteristics, disease activity, physical disability (HAQ-DI), HRQoL (SF-36), nutrition (mini nutrition assessment), and medications were recorded.

Results: Of 299 patients (89.0% female; age 61.3 ± 11.6 years; disease duration 13.9 ± 8.6 years), 37.5% had sarcopenia (27.4% severe sarcopenia). In multivariable analysis, body mass index (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.46/1 unit decrease [1.27, 1.68], p < 0.001), disease duration (1.89/10 years increase [1.27, 2.83], p = 0.002), deformity of hands/feet (3.80 [1.50, 9.61], p = 0.005), mini nutritional assessment score (1.21/1 score decrease [1.04, 1.40], p = 0.012), and high C-reactive protein (CRP) (1.94 [1.02, 3.69], p = 0.044) were independent factors associated with sarcopenia. There was no relationship between sarcopenia and disease activity (DAS-28-ESR or CRP) or medication use. RA patients with sarcopenia had higher HAQ score than those without, but potentially lower scores in physical function domain of SF-36 with adjusted mean difference of 0.2 (95% confidence interval 0.03, 0.32, p = 0.022) and -5.9 (-12.24, 0.38, p = 0.066), respectively.

Conclusions: About one third of the Thai RA patients in this center had sarcopenia. Low body mass index, long disease duration, joint deformity, malnutrition, and high CRP were independent factors associated with sarcopenia. Sarcopenia affects physical capabilities and the physical function domain of the HRQoL.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in treating idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM).

Methods: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for trials and observational studies involving RTX use in IIM. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model to generate pooled estimates for overall response, complete remission, partial response, and adverse events, with subgroup analyses by myositis type and RTX dosage (PROSPERO registered number CRD42022353740). Risk of bias assessments were done using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and risk of bias 1 tool for trials.

Results: Seventeen studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 16 observational studies), encompassing 362 patients, were included. The overall pooled response rate was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57%-82%; I2 = 74%, p < 0.001). Complete remission occurred in 13% (95% CI: 3%-25%; I2 = 79%, p < 0.001) and partial response in 48% (95% CI: 30%-67%; I2 = 87%, p < 0.001), both with significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis revealed high response rates across all myositis types: polymyositis 69%, dermatomyositis 67%, antisynthetase syndrome 70%, juvenile dermatomyositis 60%, and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy 86%. Response rates were similar between RTX induction doses of 1 g IV on days 0 and 14 (68%) and 375 mg/m 2 weekly for 4 weeks (71%). Reported adverse events totaled 120, including infusion reactions (18.5%) and infections (12.4%).

Conclusions: RTX shows a favorable clinical response in IIM treatment, though response rates vary. There was a significant heterogeneity in treatment effect estimates that are based on a small number of patients. The incidence of infusion reactions and infections highlights the need for careful monitoring. Further controlled trials are essential to refine treatment protocols and evaluate long-term outcomes for RTX's role in IIM.

Background/objective: Inflammatory arthritis frequently affects patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) but musculoskeletal corticosteroid (MSKC) injections are often avoided due to concerns of scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). This study investigated the incidence of SRC following MSKC injections.

Methods: In a 136-SSc cohort, 46 subjects underwent a total of 330 MSKC injections each receiving a significant dosage of triamcinolone acetonide (mean, 95.2 ± 44.2 mg per injection session). Data on blood pressure (BP), serum creatinine and glucose, urine protein, and complications were obtained before and after injection from the patients' medical records.

Results: MSKC and control subjects were similar in age (MSKC: 58.9 ± 12.1 vs. 55.5 ± 14.9 years), female (MSKC: 97.8% [45/46] vs. 89.9% [81/90]), antinuclear antibody (MSKC: 71.7% [33/46] vs. 81.1% [73/90]), anti-centromere antibody (MSKC: 47.8% [22/46] vs. 37.8% [34/90]), anti-topoisomerase antibody (MSKC: 26.1% [12/46] vs. 26.7% [24/90]), and anti-RNA polymerase III antibody (MSKC: 17.4.1% [8/46] vs. 24.4% [22/90]) (all p > 0.05). Pre- and post-MSKC demonstrated nonsignificant changes in systolic BP (pre: 127 ± 22 vs. post: 127 ± 21 mm Hg, p = 1.0), diastolic BP (pre: 71 ± 13 vs. post: 71 ± 11 mm Hg, p = 1.0), creatinine (pre: 0.78 ± 0.56 vs. post: 0.76 ± 0.20 mg/dL, p = 0.64), glucose (pre: 100 ± 21 vs. post: 99 ± 24 mg/dL, p = 0.67), and urine protein-creatinine ratio (pre: 0.14 ± 0.12 vs. post: 0.12 ± 0.11 mg/mg, p = 0.41). One case of SRC with mortality occurred in the controls and none in the MSKC group. No infections, hematologic abnormalities, or tendon rupture were noted.

Conclusion: MSKC injections in established SSc are generally safe with low incidences of SRC and complications. However, it is still prudent to monitor high-risk individuals and recent-onset SSc post-MSKC injection.

Background/objective: Little is known about the rates of rheumatic disease diagnosis among children during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the impact of the pandemic on the diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the United States.

Methods: We performed a historical cohort study using US commercial insurance data (2016-2021) to identify children aged <18 years without prior JIA diagnosis or treatment in the prior ≥12 months. New JIA diagnoses were identified using a combination of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes, location, and timing of medical services. Crude rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of JIA diagnosis per 100,000 enrolled children per quarter were estimated and stratified by age group, sex, region, JIA type, and uveitis. The incidence rate ratio (95% CI) for JIA diagnosis was estimated using Poisson regression, adjusted for various demographic variables.

Results: From 2018-2021, 643 children were diagnosed with JIA. Crude new JIA diagnoses per 100,000 children per quarter dropped from 2.62 (95% CI, 2.39-2.87) prepandemic to 1.94 (95% CI, 1.66-2.25) during the pandemic. Declines in JIA diagnosis were more apparent in the US Northeast and West regions and among children aged 6-11 years. After adjustment for covariates, JIA diagnoses fell by 30% during the pandemic compared with the prior 3 years (IRR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.83).

Conclusions: Compared with the prepandemic period, JIA was diagnosed 30% less often during the early pandemic among commercially insured children in the United States. More research is needed to understand the underlying reasons for these changes in JIA diagnosis and more recent trends.

Background/historical perspective: The advent of genome-wide sequencing and large-scale genetic epidemiological studies has led to numerous opportunities for the application of genetics in clinical medicine. Leveraging this information toward the formation of clinically useful tools has been an ongoing research goal in this area. A genetic risk score (GRS) is a measure that attempts to estimate the cumulative contribution of established genetic risk factors toward an outcome of interest, taking into account the cumulative risk that each of these individual genetic risk factors conveys. The purpose of this perspective is to provide a systematic framework to evaluate a GRS for clinical application.

Summary of current literature: Since the initial polygenic risk score methodology in 2007, there has been increasing GRS application across the medical literature. In rheumatology, this has included application to rheumatoid arthritis, gout, spondyloarthritis, lupus, and inflammatory arthritis.

Major conclusions: GRSs are particularly relevant to rheumatology, where common diseases have many complex genetic factors contributing to risk. Despite this, there is no widely accepted method for the critical application of a GRS, which can be a particular challenge for the clinical rheumatologist seeking to clinically apply GRSs. This review provides a framework by which the clinician may systematically evaluate a GRS.

Future research directions: As genotyping becomes more accessible and cost-effective, it will become increasingly important to recognize the clinical applicability of GRSs and identify those of the highest utility for patient care. This framework for the evaluation of a GRS will also help ensure reliability among GRS research in rheumatology, thereby helping to advance the field.