JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology最新文献

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that affects different areas of the patient's body. Patient education and health literacy is essential for them to participate actively in follow-up.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess differences between clinimetric measurements done by a medical team and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in RA and understand the impact of patient education strategies in order to identify differences between RA assessment methods.

Methods: This is a longitudinal cohort study. It included adult patients with RA and access to digital tools. These were divided into 3 groups by type of education. Group 1 included patients who participated in a multicomponent RA educational program. Group 2 did not have this multicomponent RA education. Group 3 did not receive any education. The 3 groups performed PROMs. Disease activity scales, functional class, and quality of life were measured. Univariate and bivariate analysis (χ 2 and Wilcoxon for paired data) were done.

Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in group 1, 26 in group 2, and 37 in group 3. All were women. In group 1, there were no significant differences in clinimetrics between the medical team and patient's PROMs except for fatigue. In group 2 and group 3, significant differences were found. The RAPID3 and PAS variables did not show significant differences when analyzed by intervention subgroups.

Conclusions: This study shows no differences between clinimetrics/PROMs for patients with a high-level education on RA and physicians. On the other hand, when patient did not have any RA education, the clinimetric results differed from physician measurement.

Introduction: Adult-onset Still disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory condition with a monophasic, intermittent, or chronic clinical course, and a subset may experience life-threatening complications such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). This study aims to characterize concurrent AOSD and HLH and identify variables independently associated with in-hospital death.

Methods: We performed a medical records review of AOSD with and without HLH from the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis for in-hospital death. Results were reported as adjusted odds ratios (OR adj ).

Results: There were 5495 hospitalizations with AOSD, of which 340 (6.2%) had HLH. Thirty (9.0%) of the combined AOSD and HLH group died in the hospital compared with 75 (1.5%) of those without HLH. Multivariable analysis in AOSD inpatients showed that disseminated intravascular coagulation (OR adj 6.13), hepatic failure (OR adj 7.16), infection (OR adj 3.72), respiratory failure (OR adj 6.89), and thrombotic microangiopathy (OR adj 14.05) were associated with higher odds of death. However, HLH itself was not an independent predictor of mortality in AOSD population.

Conclusions: HLH occurred in a small minority of inpatients with AOSD. HLH itself was not an independent risk factor for in-hospital death. Disseminated intravascular coagulation, hepatic failure, infection, respiratory failure, and thrombotic microangiopathy were associated with higher odds of in-hospital death in AOSD. Better awareness of these life-threatening complications may improve hospital outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the LFA-REAL ClinRO (Lupus Foundation of America Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus clinician-reported outcome) on damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Methods: Data from a prevalent lupus cohort were used. The LFA-REAL ClinRO includes 9 domains: mucocutaneous (global and 3 subdomains), musculoskeletal (global and 2 subdomains), cardiorespiratory, neuropsychiatric, renal, hematological, constitutional, vasculitis, and other (it allows for other or rare manifestations). For each domain, a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale is used, and global domains are included except for the mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal domains where the subdomains are included; it allows for 3 manifestations under "other," so the score ranges from 0 to 1400 (sum of 14 in the visual analog scale). Damage was assessed with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index. Generalized estimating equations were performed, being the outcome the increase in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index; confounders from the previous visit were included; adjusted multivariable models were done. Incidence rate ratios per 10-unit increase in the LFA-REAL ClinRO were reported. Similar models were performed to evaluate the impact of the SLEDAI-2K (SLE Disease Activity Index) and physician global assessment on damage to determine which measure would better predict damage accrual.

Results: Three-hundred thirty-one patients and 1425 visits were included, 1.9 (SD 1.2) years of follow-up. Disease duration at baseline was 10.7 (7.4) years. The mean LFA-REAL ClinRO was 18.2 (SD 30.7). During the follow-up visits, 63 (17.9%) patients accrued damage once; 4 (1.1%) accrued damage twice. The LFA-REAL ClinRO was predictive of damage accrual even after adjustment for possible confounders (incidence rate ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.16; p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained using the SLEDAI-2K and the physician global assessment.

Conclusion: The LFA-REAL ClinRO is predictive of damage accrual, even after adjusting for possible confounders.

Objective: Choroidal thickness (CT) has been evaluated as a marker of systemic inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This study evaluates the CT of AS patients before and after 6 months of biological treatment.

Methods: This longitudinal multicenter study evaluated CT in 44 AS patients. The correlations between CT and C-reactive protein (CRP) with disease activity indices were calculated. The concordance between CT and CRP was determined. We assessed factors associated with response to treatment. Clinically important improvement was defined as a decrease in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score of 1.1 points or greater.

Results: Forty-four eyes in patients aged 18 to 65 years were included. Mean CT values were significantly higher at baseline than after 6 months of treatment (baseline: 355.28 ± 80.46 μm; 6 months: 341.26 ± 81.06 μm; p < 0.001). There was a 95% concordance between CT and CRP at baseline and 6 months. Clinically important improvement was associated with lower baseline CT and age as independent factors (odds ratios, 0.97 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-0.93; p = 0.009] and 0.81 [95% confidence interval, 0.7-0.95; p = 0.005]), with baseline CT of less than 374 μm (sensitivity 78%, specificity 78%, area under the curve 0.70, likelihood ratio 3.6).

Conclusions: Choroidal thickness decreased significantly after 6 months of biological treatment in all treatment groups. Choroidal thickness and CRP had a 95% concordance. A high CT was associated with a risk of biological treatment failure. Choroidal thickness can be considered a useful biomarker of inflammation and a factor associated with response to treatment in AS.

Introduction: Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, is a putative choice in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of tofacitinib with adalimumab, in AxSpA, in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods: In this multicentric medical records review study, adult patients with active AxSpA treated with either tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously fortnightly were recruited. Effectiveness was measured with Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Drug-cost analysis was calculated with Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER drug ).

Results: Among the 266 patients, 135 were treated with tofacitinib and 131 with adalimumab (follow-up: 6.5 ± 1.6 months). Mean improvement of BASDAI (3.39 ± 0.09 vs. 3.14 ± 1.16, respectively) and that of ASDAS (1.78 ± 0.68 vs. 2.07 ± 2.08, respectively) were comparable between the adalimumab and tofacitinib groups. A higher proportion of patients achieved BASDAI50 response in the second (49.5% vs. 31.6%) and fourth month (83.9% vs. 62.8%) and ASDAS low disease activity in the fourth month (71.6% vs. 47.9%) in the adalimumab group. All disease activity measurements were similar by the sixth month in both groups. A higher proportion of patients in the tofacitinib group than in the adalimumab group required change in therapy (14.8% vs. 7.6%, respectively). ICER drug for adalimumab compared with tofacitinib was US $188.8 per patient in the adalimumab group for each person-month with BASDAI <4.

Conclusions: Tofacitinib showed comparable effectiveness with adalimumab in patients with AxSpA at the sixth month, despite lesser response in the initial months, with favorable ICER drug .

Abstract: Young adults with childhood-onset rheumatic diseases are more frequently establishing and continuing care with adult rheumatologists. The transfer of care can be challenging for both the young adult patients and their adult rheumatologists, in large part due to differences between pediatric-onset rheumatic diseases and their adult-onset counterparts, or due to the rarity of some pediatric-onset rheumatic conditions. Other challenges are due to cultural differences between pediatric and adult medical care and to the young adult needing to increasingly perform self-management skills that were previously managed by parents or other caregivers. In this review, we will provide a summary of strategies for working effectively with young adults as they transition to adult care. We will then discuss a subset of childhood-onset rheumatic diseases-including juvenile idiopathic arthritis, localized scleroderma, autoinflammatory diseases, pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile-onset dermatomyositis, and autoimmune encephalitis-for which clinical manifestations, management, and prognosis frequently differ between pediatric onset and adult onset. Our aim is to highlight differences that make caring for this population of transitioning young adults unique, providing tools and knowledge to empower the adult rheumatologist to care for these young adults in ways that are evidence-based, effective, efficient, and rewarding.