Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology最新文献

Objective: This review aims to summarize existing interventions from the international literature addressing fertility concerns in cancer patients, providing theoretical and practical guidance for future interventions. Methods: In September 2023, a systematic search covering 13 databases was conducted using the methodology outlined by the Joanne Briggs Institute for a comprehensive systematic review. This search identified published English and Chinese-language papers. Results: A total of 20 studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in this review. The studies predominantly originated in China and the United States. A comprehensive synthesis of interventions from the included literature across three dimensions and seven aspects was conducted. The interventions primarily focused on psychological interventions and web-based self-help tools for patients. The Reproductive Concerns After Cancer Scale (RCAC) was the primary assessment tool employed. Conclusion: Addressing fertility concerns in cancer patients is a complex issue involving various stakeholders and diverse intervention strategies. Lessons from international research can inform the development of context-specific interventions tailored to individual needs.

Purpose: The early detection of breast cancer in women under the age of 40 has posed significant challenges. This can be attributed in part to the limited research conducted on the breast cancer in this age group, particularly with regards to large sample sizes. We aimed to address this gap by analyzing and comparing the ultrasound imaging and pathological characteristics of breast cancer in women aged under 40 and those aged 40 and above. Methods: A retrospective assessment was conducted to examine the ultrasound imaging and clinicopathologic characteristics of 555 women with surgically confirmed breast cancers. The patient cohort consisted of 160 individuals below the age of 40 and 395 individuals aged 40 years and above. Results: Our study identified the breast cancer in patients under 40 years was more likely to show regular shape (p = 0.043) compared with tumors in patients who were 40 years and over. Furthermore, in young female patients (<40 years), irregular shape was correlated with the HER2-enriched type (p = 0.02), circumscribed margin (p = 0.001), and a lack of calcifications (p = 0.02) were associated with the triple-negative type. In another group (≥40 years), only a lack of calcifications (p = 0.003) were associated with the triple-negative type. Conclusion: Breast cancer in women under the age of 40 exhibits distinct ultrasonographic characteristics patterns that vary across different immunophenotypes, which may provide certain predictive information for physicians.

Purpose: The main objective of this study was to identify the facilitators of and barriers to the transition from pediatric to adult care for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer according to physicians and nurses working in oncology. The secondary objectives were (1) to explore the viewpoints of health care professionals (HCPs) on this transition and (2) to discover HCP's needs and the needs they perceive among AYAs and their parents. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 19 HCPs to discover their experiences with pediatric to adult care transitions. Thematic analysis was then conducted. Results: Participants reported that transitioning is a complex process influenced by numerous barriers and facilitators, which can be classified into four themes: (1) balancing the needs and relationships of the three actors involved in the transition process, (2) factors that enable HCPs to determine the ideal time for transitions, (3) institutional and organizational barriers and facilitators that challenge HCPs, and (4) HCPs' reflections on defining and improving the transition process. Conclusion: Beyond the lack of human and financial resources, which hinders the structuring of transitions, our results suggest the need for a paradigm shift. That is, the position given to AYAs in pediatrics before the transition needs to evolve so that they are gradually positioned at the center of the relationship with HCPs and, therefore, are the focus of care and the transition process. This will enable them to acquire the skills, knowledge, and autonomy needed for a successful transition to adult care.

Medulloblastoma is the most frequent high-grade tumor of the central nervous system in children but accounts for less than 1% of these tumors in adults. Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients are between both age groups, and different approaches are used to treat medulloblastoma in this population. We performed a systematic review of studies published between 2007 and 2023 that reported treatment approaches and survival data of AYA patients with medulloblastoma, defined as 15 to 39 years of age at diagnosis. Due to the heterogeneity of data, a meta-analysis was not possible. Except for the omission of chemotherapy after radiotherapy in a few adult studies, the treatment backbone is very similar between studies starting enrolment during childhood and older adolescence or adulthood. Despite indications for a higher rate of early treatment termination due to toxicity in adults, survival data remain comparable between studies starting enrolment earlier or later in life. However, molecular subtyping was missing in most studies, so the survival data must be interpreted cautiously. Nevertheless, pediatric-inspired strategies in the AYA population are feasible, but individual dose adjustments may be necessary during treatment and should be considered upfront. Collaborative studies investigating the best treatment approach for medulloblastoma in the AYA population are needed in the future.

Purpose: Fertility concerns (FC) are central to the well-being of many adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. Clinical conversations about FC and fertility preservation are suboptimal, increasing patient distress. The goal of this project was to establish content validity and comprehensibility of self-report questions on FCs for AYAs with cancer. Methods: Following best practices, we conducted: (1) item identification, refinement, and generation; (2) translatability and reading level review; and (3) cognitive interviews. Items were reviewed by five AYAs in each round of cognitive interviews. Results: A systematic search yielded 63 measures and 873 items. Fifty items were subsequently modified to enhance clarity and relevance, representing subdomains of psychological and social/relational FC. Flesch-Kincaid analysis found 31 items written above the 6th grade level, which were subsequently revised. Translatability review resulted in the modification of 3 items. During cognitive interviews, 76% of AYAs found items easy to answer with 52% describing them as "very easy" and 24% as "somewhat easy." Sixty percent of participants indicated the items captured their experiences. The majority of those who reported items only somewhat reflected or did not reflect their experiences suggested items were simply not applicable for their particular case. Conclusion: This study is a critical step toward the foundation for an FC measurement system that is reliable, flexible, developmentally appropriate, comprehensible, translatable, and interpretable. Subsequent steps include psychometric testing to examine the construct validity and reliability of the FC items and calibration to enable the application of computer-adaptive testing and short form development. The evaluation will include potential item response bias by age range, gender identity, and race/ethnicity.

This study aimed to characterize unmet reproductive health needs of female young adult survivors of childhood cancer (YASCC), as understood by oncology providers (N = 10) caring for this patient population. Providers completed brief online questionnaires and a one-time semi-structured interview. Descriptive statistics characterized quantitative data, and rapid qualitative analysis identified themes in interview data. In survey data, providers rated fertility as a top concern among YASCC. Qualitative data identified specific under-addressed reproductive and sexual health information needs for patients and also for their providers. The results provide preliminary knowledge to inform the development of behavioral interventions to address patients' unmet needs.

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer often demonstrate suboptimal engagement in cancer care due to a host of logistical, developmental, and psychological factors. This clinical case study of a young adult (YA) with cancer highlights the multiple ways in which social anxiety disorder (SAD) impacted a YA's engagement in cancer care. The case study also details the use of an evidence-based treatment for SAD to support behavioral change. Identification and receipt of timely evidence-based psychological intervention for SAD have the potential to improve AYA well-being and enhance cancer care engagement.

Purpose: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) represent a growing population worldwide, and lifelong follow-up care is recommended for most. Once CCS become adults, the transition to adult care is emerging. Today, there is no transition or long-term follow-up care model in the adult setting that clearly outweighs others. We therefore aimed to evaluate the transition to physicians outside the hospital. Methods: In this single-center, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, we assessed in 2022 the current follow-up care situation of CCS who already transitioned to physicians outside the hospital (family physicians, pediatricians). We asked CCS about cancer knowledge, worries, self-management skills, and expectations and physicians about their experience with CCS and their needs when caring for CCS. We included physicians where a CCS was transitioned to. We compared the results with CCS transitioned in a hospital setting and used descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty-three CCS responded to the questionnaire (median age at questionnaire of 22 years, median 14 years since diagnosis). Nearly two-thirds reported not being in follow-up care anymore. The cancer knowledge was good, and cancer worries were low. Twenty-eight physicians responded with 21 reporting that they care for CCS. Half of them see CCS for acute problems only. Physicians are open to care for CCS but request the necessary recommendations and would also be available for respective training. Conclusion: Transition to physicians might be an option for selected CCS. However, education and empowerment of CCS early on and education of physicians is urgently needed to prevent loss to follow-up, which may lead to lifelong nonengagement and incorrect perceptions about future health.

Purpose: We sought to evaluate physicians' baseline knowledge of fertility preservation services available to patients with a cancer diagnosis within the military health system (MHS). Methods: Data on current cancer prevalence of over 31,000 unique cancer diagnoses were obtained from a comprehensive nationwide MHS dataset. Additionally, a 22-item survey was distributed to physicians practicing within the MHS assessing knowledge of reproductive health benefits, oncofertility counseling practices, and subspecialist referral patterns. Results: From 2020 to 2022, there were 31,103 individuals of reproductive age with cancer receiving care at a military treatment facility. One hundred fourteen physicians completed our survey, 76 obstetrician gynecologists (OB/GYNs), 18 oncologists, and 20 primary care physicians (PCPs). Ninety-three percent of respondents felt conversations about fertility preservation for reproductive-aged patients with cancer were very important. A total of 66.7% of oncologists, 35.5% of OB/GYNs, and 0% of PCPs felt comfortable counseling patients on coverage. A total of 33.3% of oncologists, 29.3% of OB/GYNs, and 0% of PCPs were familiar with oncofertility Defense Health Agency guidelines. Conclusion: Primary care, OB/GYN, and oncology practitioners are well situated to provide fertility preservation counseling to all individuals with a cancer diagnosis, but differences in counseling and referral patterns and a lack of knowledge of current agency policies may impair a patient's timely access to these resources. We propose implementation of an electronic patient navigator to address gaps in oncofertility care and standardize patient counseling in the MHS. This patient-focused guide would serve as a valuable model in all types of health care settings.