Introduction: Early childhood caries (ECC), and the progression to severe ECC (S-ECC), is a serious oral health issue, leading to acute pain, sepsis, tooth loss, and compromised quality of life. Although the association between sociodemographic factors and ECC has been widely discussed, it remains unclear whether the same association exists between inequality and S-ECC.
Objectives: To investigate the impact of low income on the oral health of preschool children and explore any additional risk factors for developing ECC and S-ECC during follow-up.
Methods: The study used Taipei Child Development Screening Program data from 2014 to 2019. It included children aged 3 to 5 y who had more than 2 oral exams and completed baseline oral health questionnaires. Low-income children were matched 1:4 with controls by age and gender. Evaluation of ECC and S-ECC used the dmft index during follow-up exams. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assessed the impact of household income on ECC and S-ECC risk over time.
Results: Of the 895 participants, 179 were from low-income households. We revealed a significantly higher risk of developing S-ECC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.17) in children from low-income households, with no significantly increased of risk of developing ECC. Children who consumed sugary beverages >4 times per week showed elevated risks of developing both ECC (aOR 1.77; 95% CI 1.07-2.94) and S-ECC (aOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.13-3.17). Protective factors included children with mothers with a college education (S-ECC: aOR 0.50; 95% CI 0.32-0.79).
Conclusion: Children from low-income households have a significant risk of developing S-ECC compared with children from non-low-income households during follow-up. Factors contributing to this risk include lower maternal education, poor maternal oral health, and increased consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Policymakers should develop health measures to reduce the prevalence of ECC and S-ECC in children from low-income households whose mothers have lower educational levels and poor oral health.
Knowledge transfer statement: The results of this study highlight the significant S-ECC risk among preschool children from low-income households in Taipei, with other risk factors including higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, lower maternal education, and poor maternal oral health. Policymakers can use our findings to develop targeted policy and behavioral interventions to reduce S-ECC in vulnerable populations.
Introduction: Periodontitis has been reported with increased incidence and prevalence in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Noncommunicable diseases burden the South African public health system, and there are no data reporting on this relationship in this population. This is required to inform management protocols in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), which currently exclude the importance of periodontal treatment.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether there was an association between periodontitis and the glycemic control of adult patients with T1DM at a tertiary institution in South Africa.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on adults diagnosed with T1DM. Bleeding on probing, periodontal pocket depth, and radiographical bone loss were assessed and the periodontal status of the patient was compared to their glycemic control, measured by HbA1c. An HbA1c level of ≤7% was considered to indicate adequate glycemic control.
Results: There were 120 adult participants, of whom 61.7% (74) were female and 38.3% (46) were male. The majority were nonsmokers and younger than 44 y. There were 78 (65%) participants with uncontrolled blood glucose and 42 (35%) with good control (HbA1c ≤ 7%). The median HbA1c level was 8.75 (range, 6.1 to 12.2). Most participants (94%) had periodontitis, and 97% of them had uncontrolled blood glucose.
Conclusion: There was an association between percentage bleeding score (P < 0.001) and metabolic control in adults with T1DM treated at a tertiary hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Periodontitis severity as described by staging was not associated with T1DM in this sample. The high prevalence of periodontitis in this sample (94%) highlights the need for periodontal management to form a part of holistic patient care in patients with T1DM in this setting.
Knowledge transfer statement: The study results highlight the role of periodontitis severity and gingival bleeding scores on the metabolic control of adults with T1DM and thus emphasizes the importance of periodontal care in whole-person health in this patient population.
Introduction: Existing models of medical-dental integration, as well as those from behavioral health care integrated with primary medical treatment, provide a basis for a truly synthesized and expanded model incorporating medical, dental, and behavioral components. Such a comprehensive model allows for collaborative health care serving patients seamlessly without disciplinary silos, promoting optimal whole-person health. This innovative approach is consistent with recent developments in the behavioral and social oral health sciences that include an imperative for their full inclusion in dental health care, research, and education.
Methods: Existing models of medical-dental integration are described, along with current models from integrated primary medical and behavioral health care. Using these existing approaches as a basis, a new multilevel model is proposed to include social and cultural determinants of health.
Results: Contemporary approaches to providing health care across disciplines include referral to a geographically separate entity, co-location of services, and integrated, side-by-side care. Integration of electronic health records and interoperability are necessary (but not sufficient) factors that affect transdisciplinary health care. Effective communication among health care providers and the need for interprofessional education, comprehensive training, and ongoing cross-disciplinary consultation also are noted as crucial factors in truly collaborative care. Evidence for existing models varies greatly depending on the target population and type of services provided.
Conclusions: A fully integrated, transdisciplinary model of health care is possible, theoretically and practically. Combining aspects of extant integrated models and extending them provides opportunity for a greater focus on systemic factors and more emphasis on prevention. Consistent with this new model, medical and dental home concepts can be expanded to that of a person-centered health care home that includes interprofessional practice. This transdisciplinary approach contributes to greater health equity given the multilevel approach. Multidirectional integration of diverse disciplines representing the various realms of medicine, dentistry, and behavioral health care is essential for optimal health of all.
Knowledge transfer statement: This article can be used by clinicians, scientists, administrators, and policy makers in developing and implementing integrated systems of care that provide for patients' medical, dental, and behavioral health needs.
Introduction: Adolescents have experienced increasing levels of anxiety (AD) and depressive disorders (DD) in recent years. This study assessed the current attitudes of pediatric dentists and orthodontists on incorporating screenings for mental health disorders for their adolescent patients.
Methods: A sequential mixed-methods approach was used. A 35-item survey was sent to 5,538 pediatric dentists and orthodontists that included questions about attitudes and current screening practices for AD and DD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine factors associated with dentists' willingness to incorporate screening and discuss results with patients for AD and DD. Subsequently, we interviewed 16 orthodontists and pediatric dentists, conducted thematic analysis, and identified themes and subthemes.
Results: Based on 305 responses, >80% of respondents viewed screening for AD and DD as important, but <15% conducted screenings for them. Moreover, for those not screening, the odds of future screening for AD (odds ratio [OR]: 0.18, confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-0.43) and DD (OR: 0.23; CI: 0.09-0.56) were lower as the perceived importance of screening increased. Their willingness to screen for both AD (OR: 0.26, CI: 0.08-0.82) and DD (OR: 0.18, CI: 0.05-0.71) was also lower if they perceived this to negatively affect their patients' perception of them. The thematic analysis identified 3 main themes: (1) provider attitudes around mental health, (2) barriers to incorporating mental health screening, and (3) opportunities to integrate screening. Barriers included lack of training, access to mental health resources, and provider and patient stigma.
Conclusions: Our study showed that while most pediatric dentists and orthodontists understand the importance of screening their adolescent patients for AD and DD, many are unlikely to conduct screenings in the future. Obstacles such as inadequate training and stigma must be addressed for wider adoption. Further research and initiatives are crucial to tackle these challenges.
Knowledge transfer statement: The findings of this study offer insights to clinicians and policy makers into the attitudes, barriers, and facilitators among dentists-specifically pediatric dentists and orthodontists-who regularly treat adolescent patients, regarding mental health screenings for these individuals. This information can guide the development of initiatives, policy changes, and future research aimed at creating a more integrated dental care system that emphasizes the overall health of adolescent patients.
Introduction: The number of surgical extractions performed in hospitals in England remains unclear. This study reports the volume of surgical extractions conducted in hospitals and change in activity during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide observational cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England for patients undergoing surgical removal of a tooth (defined using OPSC-4 code F09) between April 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Procedures were stratified by age, gender, and urgency (elective or nonelective), reported using descriptive statistics, number, and percentage. We conducted post hoc modeling to predict surgical activity to December 2023. In addition, we contrasted this with aggregate national data on simple dental extraction procedures and drainage of dental abscesses in hospital as well as dental activity in general practice.
Results: We identified a total of 569,938 episodes for the surgical removal of a tooth (females 57%). Of these, 493,056/569,938 (87%) were for adults and 76,882/569,938 (13%) children ≤18 years. Surgical extractions were most frequent in adult females. Elective cases accounted for 96% (n = 548,805/569,938) of procedures. The median number of procedures carried out per quarter was 27,256, dropping to 12,003 during the COVID-19 pandemic, representing a 56% reduction in activity. This amounted to around 61,058 cancelled procedures. Modeling predicts that this activity has not returned to prepandemic levels.
Conclusions: The number of surgical extractions taking place in hospitals during the pandemic fell by 56%. The true impact of this reduction is unknown, but delayed treatment increases the risk of complications, including life-threatening infections.
Knowledge transfer statement: The result of this study provides an evidence-based overview of the trends relating to surgical extractions of teeth in England taking place in hospitals. This information can be used to inform service and workforce planning to meet the needs of patients requiring surgical extractions. The data also provide an insight into the oral health needs of the population in England.
Background: People with alcohol dependence (AD) frequently experience oral health problems, but their dental attendance is poor, with limited evidence to the reasons why from their perspective.
Objective: To explore perceived barriers, motivators, and facilitators to accessing primary dental care in people with AD.
Methods: Qualitative study consisting of remote one-to-one and group semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of adults with lived experience of AD in northern England. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. A reflexive thematic analysis method was used; use of COM-B model informed data interpretation.
Results: Twenty adults with lived experience of AD participated in 18 one-to-one interviews and 1 group interview (of 3 participants). Barriers to access were fear and physical, social, and environmental factors (physical effects of AD, financial barriers, nonprioritization of oral health). Motivators to access were pain and prioritization of oral health. Facilitators to access were patterns of alcohol use (i.e., sobriety) and dental service provision within recovery services.
Conclusions: Fear of "the dentist" is a major barrier to accessing dental care, and pain is the primary motivator, among people with AD, although neither are unique to this population. Fear and physical, social, and environmental barriers to access contribute to problem-oriented attendance, which negatively affect oral health outcomes. Opportunity to facilitate attendance increases when a person is in remission from AD through their physical capabilities improving. Increasing capability and opportunity can influence attendance beyond the automatic motivation of pain. Provision of dental care within recovery services could facilitate access to care. Understanding the "web of causation" is key to developing any intervention to improve dental access in people with AD. Further research is needed from the perspective of other adult populations with lived experience of AD, as well as of dental professionals, to gain deeper insight into barriers, facilitators, and possible solutions.
Knowledge transfer statement: