Journal of acute medicine最新文献

A 51-year-old febrile woman presented to the emergency department because of loss of consciousness while worshipping at a temple. She experienced muscle weakness and blurred vision before fainting. She also felt pain in her left shoulder and suffered from dry cough and shortness of breath during the previous week. The chest radiograph (CXR) showed bilateral reticular infiltration, indicating interstitial lung disease (ILD), and chest computed tomography revealed reticular, nodular, and reticulonodular patterns of infiltration that were compatible with ILD. Blood tests showed a creatinine kinase level of 3,307 IU/L and an Anti-Jo-1 autoantibody level of 586 AU/mL. It was found via right thigh biopsy results 8 days later that she had polymyositis with perivascular inflammation and degenerative muscle fiber change. Pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (1 gm/day for 3 days) was administered. After 4 days, she felt better and was discharged. Around 25.0%-34.1% of myositis patients have anti-Jo-1 autoantibodies, and ILD was noted in 65%-68% of anti-Jo-1-positive patients. A ground glass pattern may be observed in the CXRs of anti-Jo-1 ILD patients, and some articles described multiple pulmonary nodules mimicking lung metastasis or concomitant with pleural effusion. The conditions of approximately 42%-66% of ILD patients are controlled or are not worsened after treatment with corticosteroid and immunosuppressive drug treatment. However, some rapidly progressive cases are not sensitive to corticosteroid therapy alone.

Background: The STONE score was developed to predict uncomplicated ureteral stones in patients so that they can be managed without imaging. Validation studies had been conducted previously but the results were varied. This study aims to investigate the utility of the STONE score in an emergency department in Singapore.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of adult patients presenting with ureteric colic in the emergency department in 2015. STONE score as well as the proportion of urolithiasis diagnosed on advanced imaging in each STONE score group were calculated. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) for the STONE score components in our study and compared with the ORs obtained in the original study. Measures of diagnostic accuracy for a high STONE score were also calculated.

Results: 753 cases were included in the final analysis. Among patients with a high STONE score, 66.7% had urolithiasis and 2.6% had significant alternative diagnoses. Compared to original studies, ORs for the STONE score components obtained for our study were different. From our study, the sensitivity of a high STONE score was 47.0%, specificity was 68.7%, positive predictive value was 66.7%, negative predictive value was 49.3%, positive likelihood ratio was 1.50, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.77.

Conclusion: The STONE score is not expected to perform well in Singapore based on our study. It should be used with caution in similar Asian populations.

Background: In order to quantify fluid administration and evaluate the clinical consequences of conservative fluid management without hemodynamic monitoring in undifferentiated shock, we analyzed previously collected data from a study of carotid Doppler monitoring as a predictor of fluid responsiveness (FR).

Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of data collected from a single tertiary academic center from a previous study. Seventy-four patients were included for post-hoc analysis, and 52 of them were identified as fluid responsive (cardiac output increase > 10% with passive leg raise) according to NICOMTM bioreactance monitoring (Cheetah Medical, Newton Center, MA, USA). Treating teams provided standard of care conservative fluid resuscitation but were blinded to independently performed FR testing results. Outcomes were compared between fluid responsive and fluid non-responsive patients. Primary outcome measures were volume fluids administered and net fluid balance 24- and 72-hour post-FR assessment. Secondary outcome measures included change in vasopressor requirements, mean peak lactate levels, length of hospital/intensive care unit stay, acute respiratory failure, hemodialysis requirement, and durations of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation.

Results: Mean fluids administered within 72 hours were similar between fluid non-responsive and fluid responsive patients (139 mL/kg [95% confidence interval [CI]: 102.00-175.00] vs. 136 mL/kg [95% CI: 113.00-158.00], p = 0.92, respectively). We observed an insignificant trend toward higher 28-day mortality among fluid non-responsive patients (36% vs. 19%, p = 0.14). Volume of fluids administered significantly correlated with adverse outcomes such as increased hemodialysis requirements (32 patients, 43%), (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7200, p = 0.0018). Subgroup analysis suggested administering ≥ 30 mL/kg fluids to fluid responsive patients had a trend toward increased mortality (25% vs. 0%, p = 0.09) and a significant increase in hemodialysis (55% vs. 17%, p = 0.024).

Conclusions: Without formal FR assessment, similar amounts of total fluids were administered in both fluid responsive and non-responsive patients. As greater volumes of intravenous fluids administered were associated with adverse outcomes, we suggest that dedicated FR assessment may be a beneficial utility in early shock resuscitation.