Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no4.2566
N. Indriati, Aryani Yuliantiningsih, Wismaningsih Wismaningsih
An increase in international trip results in health risks and problems that can be solved through cooperation between countries and international organizations. This study aimed to analyze legal phenomena using certain methods, systematics, and thoughts juridical and statute approaches. The data were analyzed using the normative-qualitative technique. International Health Regulation 2005 is a legal framework of the World Health Organization (WHO) and soft law that requires no ratification. This regulation forms the basis for achieving global health goals, necessitating compliance from countries in line with Articles 2, 3, and 6 of the 2005 IHR. The State's obligations under national and international law in protecting citizens include respecting and fulfilling government implementations. Furthermore, it is expected to issue several laws and provide health facilities and services. The Government continues to increase various efforts to control the spike in active cases, such as through vaccination programs..
{"title":"International Health Regulation 2005 and Indonesia’s Actions in Handling the Covid-19 Outbreak as the State’s Responbility","authors":"N. Indriati, Aryani Yuliantiningsih, Wismaningsih Wismaningsih","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no4.2566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no4.2566","url":null,"abstract":"An increase in international trip results in health risks and problems that can be solved through cooperation between countries and international organizations. This study aimed to analyze legal phenomena using certain methods, systematics, and thoughts juridical and statute approaches. The data were analyzed using the normative-qualitative technique. International Health Regulation 2005 is a legal framework of the World Health Organization (WHO) and soft law that requires no ratification. This regulation forms the basis for achieving global health goals, necessitating compliance from countries in line with Articles 2, 3, and 6 of the 2005 IHR. The State's obligations under national and international law in protecting citizens include respecting and fulfilling government implementations. Furthermore, it is expected to issue several laws and provide health facilities and services. The Government continues to increase various efforts to control the spike in active cases, such as through vaccination programs..","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125134289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-04DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2669
Henry Yoseph Kindangen, H. Tisnanta, D. Priyono
Extradition and prosecution are cornerstones of international law cooperation’s enforcement to prevent immunity from criminal responsibility, especially regarding the refusal to extradite nationals. The principle’s implementation in its development is influenced by the trend from abolitionist countries to refuse the requests for Mutual Legal Assistance in criminal matters (MLA) related to death penalty crimes. Guarantees from requesting the state not to impose death penalty sentences needs to implement nationality jurisdiction if the state refuses to extradite its citizens to another country. Countries that impose death penalty demonstrate that the nationality principle is very successful in investigating crimes committed abroad, whereas countries that have abolished the death penalty consider the nationality principle to be a violation of human rights. This paper focuses its discussion on the usefulness of Article 8 paragraph (5) of the Criminal Code Draft, which regulates the exceptional nature of the death penalty in the nationality principle’s implementation. This paper concludes that the exceptional nature of the death penalty in nationality principles' implementation is regulated in Article 8 paragraph (5) of the Criminal Code Draft. This Article elaborates that a country of hindered crime could prevent MLA requests from Indonesia related to death penalty crimes based on its international obligations and the perspective of human right. This research uses a normative approach and pragmatic-descriptive analysis.
{"title":"Implementation of Death Penalty Crime: Dilemma between the Nationality Principle and Human Rights","authors":"Henry Yoseph Kindangen, H. Tisnanta, D. Priyono","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2669","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2669","url":null,"abstract":"Extradition and prosecution are cornerstones of international law cooperation’s enforcement to prevent immunity from criminal responsibility, especially regarding the refusal to extradite nationals. The principle’s implementation in its development is influenced by the trend from abolitionist countries to refuse the requests for Mutual Legal Assistance in criminal matters (MLA) related to death penalty crimes. Guarantees from requesting the state not to impose death penalty sentences needs to implement nationality jurisdiction if the state refuses to extradite its citizens to another country. Countries that impose death penalty demonstrate that the nationality principle is very successful in investigating crimes committed abroad, whereas countries that have abolished the death penalty consider the nationality principle to be a violation of human rights. This paper focuses its discussion on the usefulness of Article 8 paragraph (5) of the Criminal Code Draft, which regulates the exceptional nature of the death penalty in the nationality principle’s implementation. This paper concludes that the exceptional nature of the death penalty in nationality principles' implementation is regulated in Article 8 paragraph (5) of the Criminal Code Draft. This Article elaborates that a country of hindered crime could prevent MLA requests from Indonesia related to death penalty crimes based on its international obligations and the perspective of human right. This research uses a normative approach and pragmatic-descriptive analysis.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122529412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-04DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2661
Sulbadana Sulbadana
The earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction disaster resulted in casualties, environmental damage, property losses and psychological impacts. According to satellite image data obtained from the International Disaster Charter, the structural damage in Palu City due to the earthquake and tsunami reached 2,403 buildings. This caused the paralysis of Palu City from various aspects with a record of around 70,000 people were displaced. Palu city is one of the Central Sulawesi cities with a very high earthquake potential. Sustainable development is one of the most fundamental principles of international law relating to environmental preservation and development. The concept of sustainable development policy was first introduced in 1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) through its report entitled Our Common Future. In Our Common Future, sustainable development is emphasized as a development which can meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Thus, the concept of sustainable development is essentially fair in utilizing natural resources while still paying attention to the resource needs of future generations. After the disaster in Palu City, the Regional Government attempted to make policies to immediately restore the situation, both physical development in the form of facilities and infrastructure as well as non-physical or social restoration. For this reason, this study aims to determine whether government policies after the earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction are following the principles of Sustainable Development. This research is descriptive-analytical, meaning that this research is not only limited to an activity to collect and compile or explain primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, but also to analyze them concerning legal theories and the practice of implementing positive law which concerns the problem (research object). The approach used in this legal research is an approach to various international legal instruments related to the object of research as well as to take a historical approach to these international legal instruments, to understand changes and developments in the philosophy that underlies the rule of law to facilitate the analysis of the object of research and the case approach, related to legal issues that will be examined in this study.
{"title":"Sustainable Development Prinsiples: Legal Aspect Disaster Management Policies","authors":"Sulbadana Sulbadana","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2661","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2661","url":null,"abstract":"The earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction disaster resulted in casualties, environmental damage, property losses and psychological impacts. According to satellite image data obtained from the International Disaster Charter, the structural damage in Palu City due to the earthquake and tsunami reached 2,403 buildings. This caused the paralysis of Palu City from various aspects with a record of around 70,000 people were displaced. Palu city is one of the Central Sulawesi cities with a very high earthquake potential. Sustainable development is one of the most fundamental principles of international law relating to environmental preservation and development. The concept of sustainable development policy was first introduced in 1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) through its report entitled Our Common Future. In Our Common Future, sustainable development is emphasized as a development which can meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Thus, the concept of sustainable development is essentially fair in utilizing natural resources while still paying attention to the resource needs of future generations. After the disaster in Palu City, the Regional Government attempted to make policies to immediately restore the situation, both physical development in the form of facilities and infrastructure as well as non-physical or social restoration. For this reason, this study aims to determine whether government policies after the earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction are following the principles of Sustainable Development. This research is descriptive-analytical, meaning that this research is not only limited to an activity to collect and compile or explain primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, but also to analyze them concerning legal theories and the practice of implementing positive law which concerns the problem (research object). The approach used in this legal research is an approach to various international legal instruments related to the object of research as well as to take a historical approach to these international legal instruments, to understand changes and developments in the philosophy that underlies the rule of law to facilitate the analysis of the object of research and the case approach, related to legal issues that will be examined in this study.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131364479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-04DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2680
Z. Idami, Israr Hirdayadi, Q. N. M. Isa, Alfi Rahman
This paper discuss how Islamic and customary laws regulate environmental management in Aceh. A qualitative approach was used by implementing a normative juridical method. First, the data from various literature or references and documents were gathered related to the topic. It was then qualitatively analysed using the concept, constitutional and historical approaches, and Islamic environmental management regulations. According to the study's findings, the Islamic Shari'a and Aceh Customary Law cannot be separated, citing the hadith Maja "Adat ngon hukom lagee zat ngon sifeut." All customary law-based environmental management adheres to Islamic law. In the Prophet's hadith, whoever cut the sidr tree will go to hell. Under the customary law of Aceh, it is prohibited to cut trees tualang, kemuning, ketapang, etc in the forest. Except with Keujreun's permission. According to Aceh Customary Law, anyone who keeps livestock must be careful to keep them restrictions in opening land in a specific location, such as a spring source. All humans have the legal status of muhtaram in Islamic Law, not in an honourable sense. Still, their existence must be protected as living beings as well as lifeless beings, and all must be protected by their existence rights.
本文讨论了伊斯兰法和习惯法如何规范亚齐省的环境管理。通过实施规范的司法方法，采用了定性方法。首先，从各种文献或参考文献和文件中收集与主题相关的数据。然后使用概念、宪法和历史方法以及伊斯兰环境管理条例对其进行定性分析。根据该研究的结果，伊斯兰教法和亚齐习惯法不能分开，引用圣训Maja“Adat ngon hukom lagee zat ngon sifeut”。所有以习惯法为基础的环境管理都遵守伊斯兰法。在先知的圣训中，谁砍了sidr树谁就会下地狱。根据亚齐的习惯法，禁止在森林中砍伐树木tualang、kemuning、ketapang等。除非得到Keujreun的允许。根据亚齐习惯法，任何饲养牲畜的人都必须小心地将它们限制在特定地点(如泉源)的开放土地上。在伊斯兰教法中，所有人都有穆塔拉姆的法律地位，但不是在光荣的意义上。但是，他们的存在既要受到生命体的保护，也要受到无生命生命体的保护，都要受到生存权的保护。
{"title":"Environmental Management Based on Islamic Sharia and Customary Law in Aceh","authors":"Z. Idami, Israr Hirdayadi, Q. N. M. Isa, Alfi Rahman","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2680","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discuss how Islamic and customary laws regulate environmental management in Aceh. A qualitative approach was used by implementing a normative juridical method. First, the data from various literature or references and documents were gathered related to the topic. It was then qualitatively analysed using the concept, constitutional and historical approaches, and Islamic environmental management regulations. According to the study's findings, the Islamic Shari'a and Aceh Customary Law cannot be separated, citing the hadith Maja \"Adat ngon hukom lagee zat ngon sifeut.\" All customary law-based environmental management adheres to Islamic law. In the Prophet's hadith, whoever cut the sidr tree will go to hell. Under the customary law of Aceh, it is prohibited to cut trees tualang, kemuning, ketapang, etc in the forest. Except with Keujreun's permission. According to Aceh Customary Law, anyone who keeps livestock must be careful to keep them restrictions in opening land in a specific location, such as a spring source. All humans have the legal status of muhtaram in Islamic Law, not in an honourable sense. Still, their existence must be protected as living beings as well as lifeless beings, and all must be protected by their existence rights.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132518688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-04DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2656
Tommy Tommy, Febrian Febrian, Nashriana Nashriana, Ruben Achmad
Immaterial compensation is compensation that cannot be calculated with money, such as pain, loss, and psychic, but the compensation can be replaced with some money. The existence of immaterial compensation aims to protect victims of loss of life from other people such as children and wives, families, and parents. Based on the Criminal Code, hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Code, the regulation of the crime of taking life is regulated in Articles 338 to 340. The most severe threat of punishment is contained in Article 340 of the Criminal Code, namely the death penalty, or can be said to be life imprisonment, or for a while. certain period, with a maximum period of 20 (twenty) years. Therefore, the existence of liability for compensation from the defendant to the victim can reduce the defendant's sentence or can replace the main sentence of the defendant.T he research method uses a type of qualitative research sourced from the various scientific literature.
{"title":"Immaterial Compensation Not Criminal Losing Lives as an Implementation of Victim Protection","authors":"Tommy Tommy, Febrian Febrian, Nashriana Nashriana, Ruben Achmad","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2656","url":null,"abstract":"Immaterial compensation is compensation that cannot be calculated with money, such as pain, loss, and psychic, but the compensation can be replaced with some money. The existence of immaterial compensation aims to protect victims of loss of life from other people such as children and wives, families, and parents. Based on the Criminal Code, hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Code, the regulation of the crime of taking life is regulated in Articles 338 to 340. The most severe threat of punishment is contained in Article 340 of the Criminal Code, namely the death penalty, or can be said to be life imprisonment, or for a while. certain period, with a maximum period of 20 (twenty) years. Therefore, the existence of liability for compensation from the defendant to the victim can reduce the defendant's sentence or can replace the main sentence of the defendant.T he research method uses a type of qualitative research sourced from the various scientific literature. ","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131819131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-04DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2464
Latifatul Fajriyyah, Alfitri Alfitri
The hearsay evidence is still debated as valid witness evidence in Indonesian civil procedural law. Consequently, there is a disparity in judges’ decisions in handling religious civil cases when the evidence is from “hearsay witnesses.” A case in point is the decision on the application for marriage legalization issued by the Samarinda Religious Court, which received hearsay evidence, and the Samarinda Religious High Court, which rejected it. This paper intends to examine the judge’s considerations in accepting or rejecting hearsay evidence in marriage legalization applications to understand whether these considerations have used appropriate legal arguments per the principles of justice and legal certainty. As a normative-doctrinal legal study, this paper uses case law, statutory, and conceptual approaches in its discussion. It shows that the Samarinda Religious Court accepted hearsay evidence because they considered the exceptional circumstances of the marriage event that they wanted to prove. On the other hand, the Samarinda Religious Higher Court rejected the hearsay evidence because a “hearsay witness” could not be used in a contentious case. Even so, the two decisions have not provided clear legal arguments in accepting or rejecting the hearsay evidence. The development of procedural law jurisprudence in Indonesia opens up opportunities for its use in the evidentiary process to create justice and legal certainty for justice seekers.
{"title":"Hearsay Evidence Admissibility: Due Process and Evidentiary Rules in Muslim Marriage Legalization (Isbat Nikah)","authors":"Latifatul Fajriyyah, Alfitri Alfitri","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2464","url":null,"abstract":"The hearsay evidence is still debated as valid witness evidence in Indonesian civil procedural law. Consequently, there is a disparity in judges’ decisions in handling religious civil cases when the evidence is from “hearsay witnesses.” A case in point is the decision on the application for marriage legalization issued by the Samarinda Religious Court, which received hearsay evidence, and the Samarinda Religious High Court, which rejected it. This paper intends to examine the judge’s considerations in accepting or rejecting hearsay evidence in marriage legalization applications to understand whether these considerations have used appropriate legal arguments per the principles of justice and legal certainty. As a normative-doctrinal legal study, this paper uses case law, statutory, and conceptual approaches in its discussion. It shows that the Samarinda Religious Court accepted hearsay evidence because they considered the exceptional circumstances of the marriage event that they wanted to prove. On the other hand, the Samarinda Religious Higher Court rejected the hearsay evidence because a “hearsay witness” could not be used in a contentious case. Even so, the two decisions have not provided clear legal arguments in accepting or rejecting the hearsay evidence. The development of procedural law jurisprudence in Indonesia opens up opportunities for its use in the evidentiary process to create justice and legal certainty for justice seekers.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128027697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-04DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2673
Vera Bararah Barid, S. Kridasakti, P. M. Wahyuni
Indonesian migrant workers are foreign exchange heroes, and their presence can get better welfare for their families and surrounding communities. However, the state's contribution to Indonesian migrant workers is still not maximized. It can be seen in several cases faced by Indonesian migrant workers in destination countries. One of the main factors causing various legal problems faced by migrant workers is the lack of knowledge and skills in the practical field of law related to their work and work environment. This paper will discuss legal literacy as the determinant factor to be mastered by Indonesian migrant workers to survive working in other countries. This socio-legal research uses a qualitative approach; the data used are primary that have been collected for the last three years (2020-2022, and secondary data. Primary data is based on survey results (2020) and FGDs with experts conducted in the previous three years. The secondary data comes from journals, books, reports, and other related articles. This paper concludes that the distance education and learning platform with continuing education (non-degree) service format is the most suitable and efficient design for providing access to education for migrant workers to survive their life in overseas.
{"title":"Legal Literacy Strengthening for Indonesian Migrant Workers: Self-Help Ability to Survive the Life","authors":"Vera Bararah Barid, S. Kridasakti, P. M. Wahyuni","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no3.2673","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesian migrant workers are foreign exchange heroes, and their presence can get better welfare for their families and surrounding communities. However, the state's contribution to Indonesian migrant workers is still not maximized. It can be seen in several cases faced by Indonesian migrant workers in destination countries. One of the main factors causing various legal problems faced by migrant workers is the lack of knowledge and skills in the practical field of law related to their work and work environment. This paper will discuss legal literacy as the determinant factor to be mastered by Indonesian migrant workers to survive working in other countries. This socio-legal research uses a qualitative approach; the data used are primary that have been collected for the last three years (2020-2022, and secondary data. Primary data is based on survey results (2020) and FGDs with experts conducted in the previous three years. The secondary data comes from journals, books, reports, and other related articles. This paper concludes that the distance education and learning platform with continuing education (non-degree) service format is the most suitable and efficient design for providing access to education for migrant workers to survive their life in overseas.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134381927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-03DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2635
Ermanto Fahamsyah, Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo
Sustainable agriculture is one of the future-oriented legal policies. In this case, agriculture is oriented to be preserved, especially for future generations. Problems occur when various laws and regulations governing sustainable agricultural law policies are disharmonies even though they are substantially interrelated. This study aims to initiate legal politics of harmonization of sustainable agricultural policies. This research is normative legal research that focuses on analyzing legal issues. Analysis of legal issues is essential in legal research oriented to prescriptions or legal solutions to the problems being discussed. The approach in this study uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study confirm that the implications of disharmony of sustainable agricultural law policies in various laws and regulations in Indonesia need to make legal harmonization in planning, formulating, and evaluating legislation. Future improvements to the legal politics of sustainable agriculture in Indonesia can be carried out by harmonization of legal policies related to sustainable agriculture by revising the PP PBP to include sustainable agriculture as one of its regulatory substances.
{"title":"The Legal Politics Harmonization of Sustainable Agricultural Policy","authors":"Ermanto Fahamsyah, Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2635","url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable agriculture is one of the future-oriented legal policies. In this case, agriculture is oriented to be preserved, especially for future generations. Problems occur when various laws and regulations governing sustainable agricultural law policies are disharmonies even though they are substantially interrelated. This study aims to initiate legal politics of harmonization of sustainable agricultural policies. This research is normative legal research that focuses on analyzing legal issues. Analysis of legal issues is essential in legal research oriented to prescriptions or legal solutions to the problems being discussed. The approach in this study uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study confirm that the implications of disharmony of sustainable agricultural law policies in various laws and regulations in Indonesia need to make legal harmonization in planning, formulating, and evaluating legislation. Future improvements to the legal politics of sustainable agriculture in Indonesia can be carried out by harmonization of legal policies related to sustainable agriculture by revising the PP PBP to include sustainable agriculture as one of its regulatory substances.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128823503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-20DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2574
H. N. Widhiyanti, Mukhlisa Ilman Nafiah Medianto
According to the Montevideo Convention of 1993, the requirements for founding a state are fulfilled possession of people, a region, government, capability to relate to other states, and recognition of sovereignty from other states, making it still debatable whether ISIS can be considered a state or a belligerent organization. Islamic State of Iraq and Syria claim that they possess people, a region, and a government, but in reality, they cannot make diplomatic relations with other states. The National Counter-Terrorism Agency (BNPT) has declared ISIS a radical and terrorist movement. Based on BNPT and Detachment 88 data, it is suspected that 1,276 Indonesian nationals have joined ISIS, and only approximately 297 Indonesian nationals possess Indonesian passports. A debate arises regarding whether the state of Indonesia becomes responsible for its presence and whether they still possess the status of Indonesian nationals. This article is written as the results of normative juridical research that analyzes how the state is responsible for repatriating Indonesian nationals who have joined ISIS. The research found that the nationals who joined ISIS may be categorized as Foreign Terrorist Fighters. Nonetheless, international law does not regulate the nationality status of an individual when the individual becomes a part of FTF. In principle, each state can determine the regulations that organize the acquisition and deprivation of a person's nationality; in other words, the nationality status of FTF who joined ISIS entirely depends on the national law of each state. Therefore, the government of Indonesia still possesses responsibility for returning (repatriating) WNI who have joined ISIS.
{"title":"Indonesia Obligation to Repatriate Nationals Who Had Joined the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria","authors":"H. N. Widhiyanti, Mukhlisa Ilman Nafiah Medianto","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2574","url":null,"abstract":"According to the Montevideo Convention of 1993, the requirements for founding a state are fulfilled possession of people, a region, government, capability to relate to other states, and recognition of sovereignty from other states, making it still debatable whether ISIS can be considered a state or a belligerent organization. Islamic State of Iraq and Syria claim that they possess people, a region, and a government, but in reality, they cannot make diplomatic relations with other states. The National Counter-Terrorism Agency (BNPT) has declared ISIS a radical and terrorist movement. Based on BNPT and Detachment 88 data, it is suspected that 1,276 Indonesian nationals have joined ISIS, and only approximately 297 Indonesian nationals possess Indonesian passports. A debate arises regarding whether the state of Indonesia becomes responsible for its presence and whether they still possess the status of Indonesian nationals. This article is written as the results of normative juridical research that analyzes how the state is responsible for repatriating Indonesian nationals who have joined ISIS. The research found that the nationals who joined ISIS may be categorized as Foreign Terrorist Fighters. Nonetheless, international law does not regulate the nationality status of an individual when the individual becomes a part of FTF. In principle, each state can determine the regulations that organize the acquisition and deprivation of a person's nationality; in other words, the nationality status of FTF who joined ISIS entirely depends on the national law of each state. Therefore, the government of Indonesia still possesses responsibility for returning (repatriating) WNI who have joined ISIS.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114586951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-19DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2649
M. Ihsan, Maroni Maroni, Ruben Achmad
Restorative Justice is a policy that puts a focus on recovery rather than retaliation. The Restorative Justice implementation, considered more effective in terms of Justice and effectiveness, makes the Restorative Justice policy renewal of the criminal law system in Indonesia. The writing of this article uses a descriptive-analytical research method that prioritizes a normative juridical approach, with the formulation of the problem regarding the role of Restorative Justice as an effort to reform criminal law and the implementation of Restorative Justice as an alternative step in law enforcement for narcotics crimes. The result of this article is that the policy regarding Restorative Justice in its application is an update in law, especially criminal law. Conventional Justice Policies which are considered ineffective in their application are now being updated through the Restorative Justice policy; in addition to the context of the application, which is not only applied within the scope of general criminal law, in Narcotics crimes, a criminal settlement mechanism is also applied using Restorative Justice policies as stated in the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2010 concerning Placement of Abuse, Victims of Abuse and Narcotics Addicts into Medical and Social Rehabilitation Institutions (SEMA.4/2010). Rehabilitation of a Narcotics defendant can be carried out if it meets the requirements described in the regulation.
{"title":"Restorative Justice for Users of Narcotics Through Implementation of Depenalization","authors":"M. Ihsan, Maroni Maroni, Ruben Achmad","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2649","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2649","url":null,"abstract":"Restorative Justice is a policy that puts a focus on recovery rather than retaliation. The Restorative Justice implementation, considered more effective in terms of Justice and effectiveness, makes the Restorative Justice policy renewal of the criminal law system in Indonesia. The writing of this article uses a descriptive-analytical research method that prioritizes a normative juridical approach, with the formulation of the problem regarding the role of Restorative Justice as an effort to reform criminal law and the implementation of Restorative Justice as an alternative step in law enforcement for narcotics crimes. The result of this article is that the policy regarding Restorative Justice in its application is an update in law, especially criminal law. Conventional Justice Policies which are considered ineffective in their application are now being updated through the Restorative Justice policy; in addition to the context of the application, which is not only applied within the scope of general criminal law, in Narcotics crimes, a criminal settlement mechanism is also applied using Restorative Justice policies as stated in the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2010 concerning Placement of Abuse, Victims of Abuse and Narcotics Addicts into Medical and Social Rehabilitation Institutions (SEMA.4/2010). Rehabilitation of a Narcotics defendant can be carried out if it meets the requirements described in the regulation.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121610027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：