Background: One-lung ventilation (OLV) is an essential technique in thoracic surgery, and double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) are commonly used. While right-sided DLTs are useful in specific situations, few studies have investigated the prevalence of their use. This study aimed to investigate the current practice of OLV and right-sided DLT usage among anesthesiologists in Japan.
Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted in September 2024, targeting 1444 hospitals certified by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. Questionnaires were mailed to anesthesiology departments, inquiring about OLV practices, right-sided DLT usage, challenges, and desired improvements. Responses were collected via postal mail or web, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests.
Results: A total of 768 institutions responded (response rate: 53.2%). Among 761 valid responses, 74.9% performed OLV, and DLTs were the most frequently used device (94.7%). Approximately half (45.8%) of the institutions performing OLV reported never using right-sided DLTs. Frequently recognized challenges included insertion difficulty, positioning difficulty, and unfamiliarity, and 42.1% of institutions expressed a willingness to increase the use of right-sided DLTs if these challenges were resolved. Institutions with a higher annual volume of OLV cases tended to use right-sided DLTs more frequently, but the proportion of institutions unfamiliar with right-sided DLTs was not associated with the number of OLV cases performed.
Conclusion: OLV is widely practiced in Japan, primarily using DLTs, while the use of right-sided DLTs is limited. Concerns over technical difficulties and complications may hinder the use of right-sided DLTs.
{"title":"One-lung ventilation and right-sided double-lumen tubes: a national survey of current practice in Japan.","authors":"Taishi Saito, Kyosuke Takahashi, Yusuke Iizuka, Yuji Otsuka, Shigehiko Uchino, Masamitsu Sanui","doi":"10.1007/s00540-025-03547-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00540-025-03547-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One-lung ventilation (OLV) is an essential technique in thoracic surgery, and double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) are commonly used. While right-sided DLTs are useful in specific situations, few studies have investigated the prevalence of their use. This study aimed to investigate the current practice of OLV and right-sided DLT usage among anesthesiologists in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted in September 2024, targeting 1444 hospitals certified by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. Questionnaires were mailed to anesthesiology departments, inquiring about OLV practices, right-sided DLT usage, challenges, and desired improvements. Responses were collected via postal mail or web, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 768 institutions responded (response rate: 53.2%). Among 761 valid responses, 74.9% performed OLV, and DLTs were the most frequently used device (94.7%). Approximately half (45.8%) of the institutions performing OLV reported never using right-sided DLTs. Frequently recognized challenges included insertion difficulty, positioning difficulty, and unfamiliarity, and 42.1% of institutions expressed a willingness to increase the use of right-sided DLTs if these challenges were resolved. Institutions with a higher annual volume of OLV cases tended to use right-sided DLTs more frequently, but the proportion of institutions unfamiliar with right-sided DLTs was not associated with the number of OLV cases performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OLV is widely practiced in Japan, primarily using DLTs, while the use of right-sided DLTs is limited. Concerns over technical difficulties and complications may hinder the use of right-sided DLTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"48-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144626401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1007/s00540-026-03674-3
Michiaki Yamakage
The global healthcare sector accounts for approximately 4.4% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, with anesthesiology contributing disproportionately through volatile anesthetic agents whose global warming potentials range from 130 (sevoflurane) to 2540 (desflurane). This narrative review examines the environmental implications of contemporary anesthetic practice and evaluates evidence-based strategies for sustainable anesthesia delivery. Desflurane has a global warming potential approximately 20-fold greater than sevoflurane, making it the most environmentally damaging volatile anesthetic in clinical use. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) produces substantially lower emissions at approximately 0.4 kg CO₂-equivalent/h, compared with 3.1-3.8 kg CO₂-equivalent/h for volatile-based techniques. Low-flow anesthesia techniques may reduce volatile agent consumption by 50-75% without compromising patient safety. Current evidence suggests that sustainable anesthesia practices can substantially reduce environmental impact while maintaining optimal patient safety. Strategies such as eliminating desflurane use, implementing low-flow techniques, and increasing TIVA utilization represent immediately implementable interventions with established safety profiles and demonstrated economic benefits. Implementation in diverse healthcare settings, including Asian contexts, requires tailored approaches considering regional practice patterns and resource availability.
全球医疗保健部门约占温室气体排放总量的4.4%,其中麻醉学的贡献不成比例地来自挥发性麻醉剂,其全球变暖潜值从130(七氟烷)到2540(地氟烷)不等。本文回顾了当代麻醉实践对环境的影响,并评估了可持续麻醉递送的循证策略。地氟醚的全球变暖潜势大约是七氟醚的20倍,使其成为临床使用中最具环境破坏性的挥发性麻醉剂。与基于挥发物的技术的3.1-3.8 kg CO₂当量/h相比,全静脉麻醉(TIVA)产生的排放量大大降低,约为0.4 kg CO₂当量/h。低流量麻醉技术可以在不影响患者安全的情况下减少挥发性药物消耗50-75%。目前的证据表明,可持续麻醉实践可以大大减少对环境的影响,同时保持最佳的患者安全。诸如消除地氟醚的使用、实施低流量技术和提高TIVA利用率等战略都是可立即实施的干预措施,具有既定的安全性和已证明的经济效益。在包括亚洲在内的不同医疗保健环境中实施,需要考虑区域实践模式和资源可用性的量身定制方法。
{"title":"Sustainable anesthesiology: evidence-based strategies for environmental stewardship in perioperative care.","authors":"Michiaki Yamakage","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03674-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03674-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global healthcare sector accounts for approximately 4.4% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, with anesthesiology contributing disproportionately through volatile anesthetic agents whose global warming potentials range from 130 (sevoflurane) to 2540 (desflurane). This narrative review examines the environmental implications of contemporary anesthetic practice and evaluates evidence-based strategies for sustainable anesthesia delivery. Desflurane has a global warming potential approximately 20-fold greater than sevoflurane, making it the most environmentally damaging volatile anesthetic in clinical use. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) produces substantially lower emissions at approximately 0.4 kg CO₂-equivalent/h, compared with 3.1-3.8 kg CO₂-equivalent/h for volatile-based techniques. Low-flow anesthesia techniques may reduce volatile agent consumption by 50-75% without compromising patient safety. Current evidence suggests that sustainable anesthesia practices can substantially reduce environmental impact while maintaining optimal patient safety. Strategies such as eliminating desflurane use, implementing low-flow techniques, and increasing TIVA utilization represent immediately implementable interventions with established safety profiles and demonstrated economic benefits. Implementation in diverse healthcare settings, including Asian contexts, requires tailored approaches considering regional practice patterns and resource availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146093151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1007/s00540-026-03667-2
Yu-Fu Guan, Dan-Feng Wang, Fu-Shan Xue
{"title":"Comment on \"A comparison of the effects of oliceridine and sufentanil on the quality of recovery after hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial\" by Ke et al.","authors":"Yu-Fu Guan, Dan-Feng Wang, Fu-Shan Xue","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03667-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03667-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1007/s00540-026-03675-2
Xiaoli Zhao, Yi Deng
{"title":"Letter to the article by Saito et al.","authors":"Xiaoli Zhao, Yi Deng","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03675-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00540-026-03675-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Surgical smoke produced by the use of an electrosurgical unit may have a negative effect to patients and healthcare workers in the operating room, but studies on this problem are insufficient.
Methods: In 100 situations in which patients were undergoing four types of surgery under general anesthesia, the count of airborne particles (in 1.415 L) was measured using a particle counter to see possible differences at the patients and at the anesthesiologists, during different types of surgery, and at several locations.
Results: The airborne particles during the use of an electrosurgical unit were significantly higher than before its use, both at the patient's head (median: 56/L vs 3,514/L; 95%CI for the median difference: 769-7,699/L) and at the anesthesiologist's position (230/L vs 6,907/L; 95%CI for the median difference: 2,945-13,196/L) (p < 0.0001). The airborne particles were significantly higher during cardiovascular surgery than during open abdominal surgery (median difference in increase: 8,439/L), significantly higher during open abdominal surgery than during head and neck surgery (2,654/L), and significantly higher during head and neck surgery than during laparoscopic surgery (1,442/L) (all p < 0.0001), and were high anywhere in the operating room and even outside the operating room door (always > 2,000/L).
Conclusions: During the use of an electrosurgical unit, both the patients and healthcare workers are at increased risk of being exposed to high concentrations of airborne particles derived from surgical smoke.
背景:使用电外科装置产生的手术烟雾可能对手术室的患者和医护人员产生负面影响,但对这一问题的研究不足。方法:采用粒子计数器对100例全麻下4种手术的患者进行空气微粒计数(1.415 L)测定,观察不同手术类型、不同部位、患者与麻醉医师之间可能存在的差异。结果:电刀使用过程中,患者头部(中位数:56/L vs 3514 /L;中位数差值95%CI: 769- 7699 /L)和麻醉医师位置(中位数差值230/L vs 6907 /L;中位数差值95%CI: 2945 - 13196 /L)的空气悬浮颗粒均显著高于使用前(p 2000 /L)。结论:在使用电外科手术单元期间,患者和卫生保健工作者暴露于手术烟雾产生的高浓度空气传播颗粒的风险增加。
{"title":"Surgical smoke exposure to patients and to healthcare workers in the operating room: a quantitative assessment.","authors":"Shuse Matsuyama, Takashi Asai, Tomoyuki Saito, Tomoki Kiyono, Yasuhisa Okuda","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03672-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03672-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical smoke produced by the use of an electrosurgical unit may have a negative effect to patients and healthcare workers in the operating room, but studies on this problem are insufficient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 100 situations in which patients were undergoing four types of surgery under general anesthesia, the count of airborne particles (in 1.415 L) was measured using a particle counter to see possible differences at the patients and at the anesthesiologists, during different types of surgery, and at several locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The airborne particles during the use of an electrosurgical unit were significantly higher than before its use, both at the patient's head (median: 56/L vs 3,514/L; 95%CI for the median difference: 769-7,699/L) and at the anesthesiologist's position (230/L vs 6,907/L; 95%CI for the median difference: 2,945-13,196/L) (p < 0.0001). The airborne particles were significantly higher during cardiovascular surgery than during open abdominal surgery (median difference in increase: 8,439/L), significantly higher during open abdominal surgery than during head and neck surgery (2,654/L), and significantly higher during head and neck surgery than during laparoscopic surgery (1,442/L) (all p < 0.0001), and were high anywhere in the operating room and even outside the operating room door (always > 2,000/L).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the use of an electrosurgical unit, both the patients and healthcare workers are at increased risk of being exposed to high concentrations of airborne particles derived from surgical smoke.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1007/s00540-026-03669-0
M Vijayasimha, M Srikanth
{"title":"Comments on \"Remimazolam provides better hemodynamic stability than propofol in hypertensive surgical patients: a randomized single-blinded trial\" by Wang et al.","authors":"M Vijayasimha, M Srikanth","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03669-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03669-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146063539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1007/s00540-026-03668-1
Jiliang He
{"title":"Clarifying respiratory safety end points in nonintubated hysteroscopic anesthesia.","authors":"Jiliang He","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03668-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03668-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Predicting postpartum hemorrhage risk can be useful in clinical settings. We aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction model for postpartum hemorrhage in patients who undergo elective cesarean section.
Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent elective cesarean section between January 2008 and September 2021. The primary outcome to be predicted was postpartum hemorrhage, defined as blood loss of ≥ 1500 mL during surgery. We used data prior to January 2018 for the development cohort and after for the validation cohort. We then constructed a multivariate logistic regression model. The model performance, including discrimination and calibration, was evaluated and its diagnostic ability was assessed.
Results: Of the 4070 patients, 860 (21.0%) had postpartum hemorrhage. The predictors were twin pregnancy, benign uterine disease, assisted reproduction, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, nulliparity, and neonatal weight > 3000 g. In the validation cohort, the prediction model C-statistic was 0.780 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.745-0.816). We developed a simple scoring system to divide the patients into three risk groups (low, moderate, and high). If the cut-off risk score was set to moderate, the negative likelihood ratio was low (0.221, 95% CI 0.108-0.374); conversely, if the cut-off risk score was set to high, the positive likelihood ratio was high (5.882, 95% CI 3.750-9.333).
Conclusion: The model we developed can stratify the risk of postpartum hemorrhage and assist in clinical decision-making. Future studies are required to validate the performance of our model.
目的:预测产后出血风险可用于临床设置。我们的目的是建立并验证一种选择性剖宫产患者产后出血的临床预测模型。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了2008年1月至2021年9月期间接受择期剖宫产手术的患者。预测的主要结局为产后出血,定义为术中出血量≥1500ml。我们将2018年1月之前的数据用于开发队列,将2018年1月之后的数据用于验证队列。然后,我们构建了一个多元逻辑回归模型。对模型的判别和标定性能进行了评价,并对其诊断能力进行了评估。结果:4070例患者中有860例(21.0%)发生产后出血。预测因子为双胎妊娠、良性子宫疾病、辅助生殖、妊娠期糖尿病、前置胎盘、无产和新生儿体重> 3000g。在验证队列中,预测模型c统计量为0.780(95%可信区间[CI] 0.745 ~ 0.816)。我们开发了一个简单的评分系统,将患者分为三个风险组(低、中、高)。如果截断风险评分为中等,则负似然比较低(0.221,95% CI 0.108-0.374);反之,如果截断风险评分较高,则阳性似然比较高(5.882,95% CI 3.750-9.333)。结论:建立的模型可以对产后出血风险进行分层,有助于临床决策。需要进一步的研究来验证我们模型的性能。
{"title":"Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for postpartum hemorrhage after elective cesarean section.","authors":"Yuto Makino, Takeyuki Kiguchi, Itsuki Makino, Tomoaki Fujii, Yusuke Ota, Atsushi Terazawa, Kazumasa Hayashi, Noriko Kato, Daichi Kawaguchi, Hirokazu Uehara, Taku Iwami","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03671-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03671-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Predicting postpartum hemorrhage risk can be useful in clinical settings. We aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction model for postpartum hemorrhage in patients who undergo elective cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent elective cesarean section between January 2008 and September 2021. The primary outcome to be predicted was postpartum hemorrhage, defined as blood loss of ≥ 1500 mL during surgery. We used data prior to January 2018 for the development cohort and after for the validation cohort. We then constructed a multivariate logistic regression model. The model performance, including discrimination and calibration, was evaluated and its diagnostic ability was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4070 patients, 860 (21.0%) had postpartum hemorrhage. The predictors were twin pregnancy, benign uterine disease, assisted reproduction, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, nulliparity, and neonatal weight > 3000 g. In the validation cohort, the prediction model C-statistic was 0.780 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.745-0.816). We developed a simple scoring system to divide the patients into three risk groups (low, moderate, and high). If the cut-off risk score was set to moderate, the negative likelihood ratio was low (0.221, 95% CI 0.108-0.374); conversely, if the cut-off risk score was set to high, the positive likelihood ratio was high (5.882, 95% CI 3.750-9.333).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model we developed can stratify the risk of postpartum hemorrhage and assist in clinical decision-making. Future studies are required to validate the performance of our model.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146052104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1007/s00540-026-03659-2
Eylem Yaşar, Ali İhsan Uysal, Ozlem Sen
{"title":"Comments on \"Comparison of preoperative neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio, systemic immune-inflammatory index, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting postoperative delirium in patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstruction surgery: a retrospective observational study\" by Saito et al.","authors":"Eylem Yaşar, Ali İhsan Uysal, Ozlem Sen","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03659-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03659-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-24DOI: 10.1007/s00540-026-03655-6
Yener Aksoy, Asu Ozgultekin, Yelda Balık, Osman Ekinci
Purpose: Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is challenging and has multiple causes. The diaphragm is the main respiratory muscle for inspiration. This prospective study aimed to determine the value of standardized diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) measurements [diaphragm excursion (DE), diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF), diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI), rapid shallow diaphragmatic index (RSDI)] in predicting extubation success in intensive care patients, both individually and in combination with conventional indices [rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), dynamic compliance (Cdyn), airway occlusion pressure, semi-quantitative cough strength score]. To isolate diaphragm contribution, only neurologically intact patients (Glasgow Coma Scale > 14) with adequate airway protection reflexes were included. The second aim was to examine the relationship between IMV and DUS measurements.
Methods: 151 patients on IMV for > 24 h and eligible for spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) were evaluated. Following exclusion criteria, patients underwent SBT in pressure support ventilation mode (positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cmH2O, pressure support 8 cmH2O). During SBT, mechanical ventilation parameters and diaphragm ultrasound measurements were recorded. Extubation failure was defined as need for reintubation or non-invasive ventilation.
Results: DE and DTF were significantly higher, D-RSBI was lower in patients with successful extubation. There was no difference in RSDI. Multivariate logistic regression was statistically significant, odds ratios (10.018, 1.109, 1.094) were found for DE, DTF, Cdyn, respectively. The only significant correlation between IMV and DUS was DTF-tidal volume (r = - 0.500).
Conclusion: A standardized multiparametric model, combining DUS with conventional indices, provides moderate predictive accuracy for extubation success. Integrating DUS into weaning protocols can improve extubation readiness.
{"title":"Comparison of standardized diaphragm ultrasound measurement and conventional methods for predicting weaning failure: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Yener Aksoy, Asu Ozgultekin, Yelda Balık, Osman Ekinci","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03655-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03655-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is challenging and has multiple causes. The diaphragm is the main respiratory muscle for inspiration. This prospective study aimed to determine the value of standardized diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) measurements [diaphragm excursion (DE), diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF), diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI), rapid shallow diaphragmatic index (RSDI)] in predicting extubation success in intensive care patients, both individually and in combination with conventional indices [rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), dynamic compliance (Cdyn), airway occlusion pressure, semi-quantitative cough strength score]. To isolate diaphragm contribution, only neurologically intact patients (Glasgow Coma Scale > 14) with adequate airway protection reflexes were included. The second aim was to examine the relationship between IMV and DUS measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>151 patients on IMV for > 24 h and eligible for spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) were evaluated. Following exclusion criteria, patients underwent SBT in pressure support ventilation mode (positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, pressure support 8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). During SBT, mechanical ventilation parameters and diaphragm ultrasound measurements were recorded. Extubation failure was defined as need for reintubation or non-invasive ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DE and DTF were significantly higher, D-RSBI was lower in patients with successful extubation. There was no difference in RSDI. Multivariate logistic regression was statistically significant, odds ratios (10.018, 1.109, 1.094) were found for DE, DTF, Cdyn, respectively. The only significant correlation between IMV and DUS was DTF-tidal volume (r = - 0.500).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A standardized multiparametric model, combining DUS with conventional indices, provides moderate predictive accuracy for extubation success. Integrating DUS into weaning protocols can improve extubation readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}