首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy最新文献

英文 中文
Awareness and attitudes regarding breast cancer and breast self-examination among female Jordanian students. 约旦女学生对乳腺癌和乳房自我检查的认识和态度。
Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.139730
Amal K Suleiman

Background: Despite huge efforts to increase the level of breast cancer awareness, breast self-examination (BSE) is still poorly practiced across Jordan. This baseline study aimed to assess the awareness of female Jordanian students about breast cancer and their practice of BSE.

Materials and methods: Using a cross-sectional research design, a self-administered survey was used, via a pre-validated pre-piloted questionnaire was distributed to 900 female students aged between 18 and 37 years recruited from the University of Jordan in Amman. The questionnaire was divided into four domains: Socio-demographic characteristics; the respondent's knowledge of breast cancer and BSE; their attitude towards risk factors for breast cancer; their experience of breast cancer screening and BSE. Statistical analysis was performed using Epi-Info version 6.4 statistical Software.

Results: The overall response rate was 93.3%. Approximately half of the respondents 435 (51.8%) were aware of breast cancer. Of these, 99 (22.7%) believed that it was caused by a medical condition, followed by old age (71; 16.4%), lack of breastfeeding (58; 13.3%), heredity (56; 12.8%), late marriage (44; 10.3%), pregnancies in older women (33; 7.5%), the use of brassieres (18; 4.1%), excessive breastfeeding (17; 3.9%), being unmarried (14; 3.2%), and spirituality (11; 2.6%). Overall, 152 participants (34.9%) were aware of BSE, but only 93 (11%) had performed it.

Conclusions: The current status of awareness of breast cancer in Jordanian students and their use of BSE are insufficient. Women need to be encouraged to self-monitor in order to detect abnormalities in their breasts. Appropriate educational interventions are urgently required to encourage women to engage in regular BSE.

背景:尽管在提高乳腺癌意识方面做出了巨大的努力,但在约旦,乳房自我检查(BSE)的实践仍然很差。这项基线研究旨在评估约旦女学生对乳腺癌和她们的疯牛病实践的认识。材料和方法:采用横断面研究设计,采用自我管理的调查,通过预先验证的预试点问卷,向安曼约旦大学招募的900名年龄在18至37岁之间的女学生分发问卷。问卷分为四个领域:社会人口特征;被访者对乳腺癌和疯牛病的了解程度;她们对乳腺癌危险因素的态度;她们在乳腺癌筛查和疯牛病方面的经验采用Epi-Info version 6.4统计软件进行统计分析。结果:总有效率为93.3%。435名受访者中约有一半(51.8%)知道乳腺癌。其中,99人(22.7%)认为这是由疾病引起的,其次是老年(71人;16.4%),缺乏母乳喂养(58%;13.3%),遗传(56;12.8%),晚婚(44%;10.3%),高龄妇女怀孕(33%;7.5%),胸罩的使用(18%;4.1%),过度母乳喂养(17%;3.9%),未婚(14%;3.2%),以及灵性(11%;2.6%)。总体而言,152名参与者(34.9%)意识到疯牛病,但只有93名参与者(11%)采取了行动。结论:目前约旦学生对乳腺癌的认识和使用疯牛病的情况不足。需要鼓励女性自我监测,以便发现乳房的异常情况。迫切需要适当的教育干预措施来鼓励妇女经常患疯牛病。
{"title":"Awareness and attitudes regarding breast cancer and breast self-examination among female Jordanian students.","authors":"Amal K Suleiman","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.139730","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.139730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite huge efforts to increase the level of breast cancer awareness, breast self-examination (BSE) is still poorly practiced across Jordan. This baseline study aimed to assess the awareness of female Jordanian students about breast cancer and their practice of BSE.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using a cross-sectional research design, a self-administered survey was used, via a pre-validated pre-piloted questionnaire was distributed to 900 female students aged between 18 and 37 years recruited from the University of Jordan in Amman. The questionnaire was divided into four domains: Socio-demographic characteristics; the respondent's knowledge of breast cancer and BSE; their attitude towards risk factors for breast cancer; their experience of breast cancer screening and BSE. Statistical analysis was performed using Epi-Info version 6.4 statistical Software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate was 93.3%. Approximately half of the respondents 435 (51.8%) were aware of breast cancer. Of these, 99 (22.7%) believed that it was caused by a medical condition, followed by old age (71; 16.4%), lack of breastfeeding (58; 13.3%), heredity (56; 12.8%), late marriage (44; 10.3%), pregnancies in older women (33; 7.5%), the use of brassieres (18; 4.1%), excessive breastfeeding (17; 3.9%), being unmarried (14; 3.2%), and spirituality (11; 2.6%). Overall, 152 participants (34.9%) were aware of BSE, but only 93 (11%) had performed it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current status of awareness of breast cancer in Jordanian students and their use of BSE are insufficient. Women need to be encouraged to self-monitor in order to detect abnormalities in their breasts. Appropriate educational interventions are urgently required to encourage women to engage in regular BSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 3","pages":"74-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.139730","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32716663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81
A clinical study on drug-related problems associated with intravenous drug administration. 静脉给药相关药物问题的临床研究。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.134984
A Vijayakumar, E V Sharon, J Teena, S Nobil, I Nazeer
Background: Infusion therapy through intravenous (IV) access is a therapeutic option used in the treatment of many hospitalized patients. IV therapy is complex, potentially dangerous and error prone. The objectives were to ascertain the drug-related problems (DRPs) involved in IV medication administration and further to develop strategies to reduce and prevent the occurrence of DRPs during IV administration. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 4 months. Patients receiving more than two medications through IV route were included and studied. Results: Of 110 patients, 76 (69.09%) were male and the rest were female. Nearly, half of the patients (46.3%, n = 51) were reported with DRPs. Of the 80 DRPs (72.72%) documented, 61 problems (55.4%) were seen in patients given IV medications through peripheral line. Among the DRPs majority seen were incompatibilities (40.9%, n = 45), followed by complications developed (12.7%, n = 14), errors in rate of administration (10.9%), and dilution errors (8%). To study the association of DRPs among gender, statistical analysis was performed and significant association was seen between DRPs and gender (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Among the reported DRPs, simultaneous IV administration of two incompatible drugs was the main predicament faced.
背景:通过静脉输注治疗是许多住院患者治疗的一种治疗选择。静脉注射治疗很复杂,有潜在危险,而且容易出错。目的是确定静脉给药过程中的药物相关问题(DRPs),并进一步制定减少和预防静脉给药过程中药物相关问题发生的策略。材料与方法:前瞻性观察研究,为期4个月。通过静脉注射途径接受两种以上药物治疗的患者被纳入研究。结果:110例患者中,男性76例,占69.09%,其余为女性。近一半的患者(46.3%,n = 51)报告有DRPs。在记录的80例drp(72.72%)中,通过外周静脉给药的患者出现61例(55.4%)问题。在drp中,最常见的是不相容(40.9%,n = 45),其次是并发症(12.7%,n = 14),给药率错误(10.9%)和稀释错误(8%)。为了研究DRPs与性别之间的相关性,我们进行统计学分析,DRPs与性别之间存在显著相关(P = 0.03)。结论:在报告的DRPs中,两种不相容药物同时静脉给药是面临的主要困境。
{"title":"A clinical study on drug-related problems associated with intravenous drug administration.","authors":"A Vijayakumar,&nbsp;E V Sharon,&nbsp;J Teena,&nbsp;S Nobil,&nbsp;I Nazeer","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.134984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.134984","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infusion therapy through intravenous (IV) access is a therapeutic option used in the treatment of many hospitalized patients. IV therapy is complex, potentially dangerous and error prone. The objectives were to ascertain the drug-related problems (DRPs) involved in IV medication administration and further to develop strategies to reduce and prevent the occurrence of DRPs during IV administration. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 4 months. Patients receiving more than two medications through IV route were included and studied. Results: Of 110 patients, 76 (69.09%) were male and the rest were female. Nearly, half of the patients (46.3%, n = 51) were reported with DRPs. Of the 80 DRPs (72.72%) documented, 61 problems (55.4%) were seen in patients given IV medications through peripheral line. Among the DRPs majority seen were incompatibilities (40.9%, n = 45), followed by complications developed (12.7%, n = 14), errors in rate of administration (10.9%), and dilution errors (8%). To study the association of DRPs among gender, statistical analysis was performed and significant association was seen between DRPs and gender (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Among the reported DRPs, simultaneous IV administration of two incompatible drugs was the main predicament faced.","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 2","pages":"49-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.134984","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32509218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
Knowledge and use of dietary supplements by students of College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria. 尼日利亚拉各斯伊迪阿拉巴市拉各斯大学医学院学生对膳食补充剂的了解和使用情况。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.134952
Bolajoko A Aina, Oluwayemisi A Ojedokun

Rationale: Nutritional supplements are preparations intended to supplement the diet and provide nutrients. They include vitamins, minerals, fiber, fatty acids, or amino acids, that may be missing or may not be consumed in sufficient quantities in a person's diet. Many health professionals including dietitians, physicians and pharmacists are supplement users.

Objectives: The objectives of the present study were to determine knowledge and use of dietary supplements among students of College of Medicine, University of Lagos who are potential health professionals.

Methodology: A self-administered questionnaire with a mix of open and close ended questions was employed to collect data in this study. It was distributed to 300 students that were in their final year in various departments of the college.

Findings: Response rate was 89%. About 86% of the students have used dietary supplement before while half of them (50%) have used it in the past 12 months. The common types of dietary supplements used in the past 12 months are the vitamins. The reasons for use by the students were good health, poor diet, to boost immunity, weight gain and doctor's prescription. Most of the students were occasional and once in a while users.

Conclusions: Majority of the students were aware of dietary supplement use and most of them were occasional users.

原理:营养补充剂是用来补充饮食和提供营养的制剂。它们包括维生素、矿物质、纤维、脂肪酸或氨基酸,这些在人的饮食中可能会缺失或摄入不足。许多健康专业人士,包括营养师、医生和药剂师都是补充剂的使用者。目的:本研究的目的是确定拉各斯大学医学院学生中潜在的卫生专业人员对膳食补充剂的了解和使用情况。方法:采用开放式和封闭式问题混合的自我管理问卷来收集本研究的数据。它被分发给300名学生,他们是学院各个部门的最后一年学生。结果:有效率89%。约86%的学生曾服用膳食补充剂,其中一半(50%)的学生在过去12个月内服用过。在过去的12个月里,最常见的膳食补充剂是维生素。学生们使用的原因是身体健康、饮食不良、增强免疫力、体重增加和医生的处方。大多数学生都是偶尔或偶尔使用。结论:大多数学生了解膳食补充剂的使用情况,其中大多数是偶尔使用。
{"title":"Knowledge and use of dietary supplements by students of College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.","authors":"Bolajoko A Aina,&nbsp;Oluwayemisi A Ojedokun","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.134952","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.134952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Nutritional supplements are preparations intended to supplement the diet and provide nutrients. They include vitamins, minerals, fiber, fatty acids, or amino acids, that may be missing or may not be consumed in sufficient quantities in a person's diet. Many health professionals including dietitians, physicians and pharmacists are supplement users.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the present study were to determine knowledge and use of dietary supplements among students of College of Medicine, University of Lagos who are potential health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire with a mix of open and close ended questions was employed to collect data in this study. It was distributed to 300 students that were in their final year in various departments of the college.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Response rate was 89%. About 86% of the students have used dietary supplement before while half of them (50%) have used it in the past 12 months. The common types of dietary supplements used in the past 12 months are the vitamins. The reasons for use by the students were good health, poor diet, to boost immunity, weight gain and doctor's prescription. Most of the students were occasional and once in a while users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Majority of the students were aware of dietary supplement use and most of them were occasional users.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 2","pages":"34-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.134952","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32509215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
A study of potential adverse drug-drug interactions among prescribed drugs in medicine outpatient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital. 某三级教学医院内科门诊处方药物潜在不良相互作用的研究。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.134983
Pankti S Patel, Devang A Rana, Jalpa V Suthar, Supriya D Malhotra, Varsha J Patel

Objective: To evaluate prevalence, types, and severity of potential adverse drug-drug interaction in medicine out-patient department.

Materials and methods: A single-point, prospective, and observational study was carried out in medicine OPD. Study began after obtaining approval Institutional Ethics Committee. Data were collected and potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) were identified using medscape drug interaction checker and were analyzed.

Result: A total of 350 prescriptions with mean age 52.45 ± 14.49 years were collected over a period of 5 months. A total of 2066 pDDIs were recorded with mean of 5.90 ± 6.0. The prevalence of pDDI was 83.42%. Aspirin was most frequently prescribed drug in 185 (10.15%) out of total of 1821 drugs It was also the most frequent drug implicated in pDDI i.e. in 48.16%. The most common pDDI identified was metoprolol with aspirin in 126 (6.09%). Mechanism of interactions was pharmacokinetic in 553 (26.76%), pharmacodynamic in 1424 (68.92%) and 89 (4.30%) having an unknown mechanism. Out of all interactions, 76 (3.67%) were serious, 1516 (73.37%) significant, and 474 (22.94%) were minor interaction. Age of the patients (r = 0.327, P = 0.0001) and number of drugs prescribed (r = 0.714, P = 0.0001) are significantly correlated with drug interactions.

Conclusion: Aspirin being the most common drug interacting. The use of electronic decision support tools, continuing education and vigilance on the part of prescribers toward drug selection may decrease the problem of pDDIs.

目的:了解门诊潜在不良药物相互作用的发生率、类型及严重程度。材料和方法:在医学OPD中进行了一项单点、前瞻性和观察性研究。获得机构伦理委员会批准后开始研究。收集数据,利用medscape药物相互作用检测器(medscape drug interaction checker)识别潜在药物相互作用(pddi)并进行分析。结果:5个月内共收集处方350张,平均年龄52.45±14.49岁。共记录pddi 2066例,平均(5.90±6.0)。pDDI患病率为83.42%。在总共1821种药物中,阿司匹林是185种(10.15%)中最常见的处方药,也是与pDDI相关的最常见药物,即48.16%。最常见的pDDI是美托洛尔联合阿司匹林,126例(6.09%)。相互作用机制为药代动力学553例(26.76%),药效学1424例(68.92%),作用机制未知89例(4.30%)。严重交互作用76例(3.67%),显著交互作用1516例(73.37%),轻微交互作用474例(22.94%)。患者年龄(r = 0.327, P = 0.0001)和处方药物数量(r = 0.714, P = 0.0001)与药物相互作用显著相关。结论:阿司匹林是最常见的相互作用药物。电子决策支持工具的使用、继续教育和处方者对药物选择的警惕可能会减少pddi的问题。
{"title":"A study of potential adverse drug-drug interactions among prescribed drugs in medicine outpatient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital.","authors":"Pankti S Patel,&nbsp;Devang A Rana,&nbsp;Jalpa V Suthar,&nbsp;Supriya D Malhotra,&nbsp;Varsha J Patel","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.134983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.134983","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate prevalence, types, and severity of potential adverse drug-drug interaction in medicine out-patient department.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-point, prospective, and observational study was carried out in medicine OPD. Study began after obtaining approval Institutional Ethics Committee. Data were collected and potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) were identified using medscape drug interaction checker and were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 350 prescriptions with mean age 52.45 ± 14.49 years were collected over a period of 5 months. A total of 2066 pDDIs were recorded with mean of 5.90 ± 6.0. The prevalence of pDDI was 83.42%. Aspirin was most frequently prescribed drug in 185 (10.15%) out of total of 1821 drugs It was also the most frequent drug implicated in pDDI i.e. in 48.16%. The most common pDDI identified was metoprolol with aspirin in 126 (6.09%). Mechanism of interactions was pharmacokinetic in 553 (26.76%), pharmacodynamic in 1424 (68.92%) and 89 (4.30%) having an unknown mechanism. Out of all interactions, 76 (3.67%) were serious, 1516 (73.37%) significant, and 474 (22.94%) were minor interaction. Age of the patients (r = 0.327, P = 0.0001) and number of drugs prescribed (r = 0.714, P = 0.0001) are significantly correlated with drug interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aspirin being the most common drug interacting. The use of electronic decision support tools, continuing education and vigilance on the part of prescribers toward drug selection may decrease the problem of pDDIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 2","pages":"44-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.134983","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32509217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57
Prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India. 印度一家初级保健中心实习生的处方模式。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.134980
Indranil Banerjee, Tania Bhadury

Background: Prescription is the written order of the physician which is conveyed to the patient. Rational prescription writing is a skill which should be mastered at the earliest. Internship is the period where undergraduate medical education can be consolidated through continued learning under the direct supervision of teachers. The attitude of interns toward rational drug use is of utmost importance. The present study aimed to explore the prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted for a period of 2 months (June 1 2010-July 30 2010) in a primary health center attached to a medical college in India. The main outcome measure was to assess rationality of prescribing pattern of interns was measured as per World Health Organization enlisted prescribing indicators. Data analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistical methods: Frequencies, percentage, and mean standard deviation.

Results: A total of 1968 drugs were prescribed in 760 prescriptions analyzed with an average of 2.58 drugs per prescription. Analgesic was the most commonly prescribed drug (25.78%) followed by antibiotics (22.1%), drugs used for gastrointestinal symptom (15.78%), multivitamins (11.84%), anti-malarials (8.35%), antihistaminics (6.25%), and hematinics (5.36%). Regarding prescribing indicators, in 435 prescriptions (22.4%), antibiotics were advised. A total of 688 (34.97%) drugs were prescribed by generic name, while the percentage of drugs prescribed from essential drug list of India was 58.47%. Injectables were prescribed in 89 prescriptions (4.49%).

Conclusion: The present study shows that irrational prescribing practices are common among interns of the institute. The art of rational prescribing should be taught to them by medical teachers who are adequately trained in rational drug use.

背景:处方是医生传达给患者的书面命令。合理的处方书写是一项应尽早掌握的技能。实习是本科医学教育在教师的直接指导下,通过继续学习来巩固的阶段。实习生对合理用药的态度至关重要。本研究旨在探讨在印度初级卫生中心实习医生的处方模式。材料和方法:在印度一所医学院附属的初级保健中心进行了为期2个月的横断面研究(2010年6月1日至2010年7月30日)。主要结局指标为评价实习生处方模式的合理性,按照世界卫生组织编制的处方指标进行测量。数据分析采用描述性和推断性统计方法:频率、百分比和平均标准偏差。结果:分析760张处方,共处方药物1968种,平均处方药物2.58种。镇痛药是最常见的处方药物(25.78%),其次是抗生素(22.1%)、胃肠道症状药物(15.78%)、复合维生素(11.84%)、抗疟疾药(8.35%)、抗组胺药(6.25%)和血液药(5.36%)。处方指标方面,435张处方(22.4%)建议使用抗生素。共有688种药物(34.97%)采用仿制名开具处方,而印度基本药物清单中开具的药物比例为58.47%。89张处方中使用注射剂,占4.49%。结论:我院实习生不合理处方现象普遍存在。应由在合理用药方面受过充分培训的医学教师向他们传授合理处方的艺术。
{"title":"Prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.","authors":"Indranil Banerjee,&nbsp;Tania Bhadury","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.134980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.134980","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescription is the written order of the physician which is conveyed to the patient. Rational prescription writing is a skill which should be mastered at the earliest. Internship is the period where undergraduate medical education can be consolidated through continued learning under the direct supervision of teachers. The attitude of interns toward rational drug use is of utmost importance. The present study aimed to explore the prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted for a period of 2 months (June 1 2010-July 30 2010) in a primary health center attached to a medical college in India. The main outcome measure was to assess rationality of prescribing pattern of interns was measured as per World Health Organization enlisted prescribing indicators. Data analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistical methods: Frequencies, percentage, and mean standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1968 drugs were prescribed in 760 prescriptions analyzed with an average of 2.58 drugs per prescription. Analgesic was the most commonly prescribed drug (25.78%) followed by antibiotics (22.1%), drugs used for gastrointestinal symptom (15.78%), multivitamins (11.84%), anti-malarials (8.35%), antihistaminics (6.25%), and hematinics (5.36%). Regarding prescribing indicators, in 435 prescriptions (22.4%), antibiotics were advised. A total of 688 (34.97%) drugs were prescribed by generic name, while the percentage of drugs prescribed from essential drug list of India was 58.47%. Injectables were prescribed in 89 prescriptions (4.49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study shows that irrational prescribing practices are common among interns of the institute. The art of rational prescribing should be taught to them by medical teachers who are adequately trained in rational drug use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 2","pages":"40-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/8f/JBCP-5-40.PMC4074694.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32509216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics. 儿科抗凝治疗。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.134947
Mariam K Dabbous, Fouad R Sakr, Diana N Malaeb

Thromboembolic episodes are disorders encountered in both children and adults, but relatively more common in adults. However, the occurrence of venous thromboembolism and use of anticoagulants in pediatrics are increasing. Unfractionated Heparin (UH) is used as a treatment and prevention of thrombosis in adults and critically ill children. Heparin utilization in pediatric is limited by many factors and the most important ones are Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) and anaphylaxis. However, Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) appears to be an effective and safe alternative treatment. Hence, it is preferred over than UH due to favorable pharmacokinetic and side effect profile. Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) is a promising class over the other anticoagulants since it offers potential advantages. The aim of this review is to discuss the differences between adult and pediatric thromboembolism and to review the current anticoagulants in terms of pharmacological action, doses, drug reactions, pharmacokinetics, interactions, and parameters. This review also highlights the differences between old and new anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics.

血栓栓塞性发作是儿童和成人都遇到的疾病,但相对而言更常见于成人。然而,儿科静脉血栓栓塞的发生率和抗凝剂的使用正在增加。未分离肝素(UH)用于治疗和预防成人和危重儿童血栓形成。儿童肝素的使用受到许多因素的限制,其中最重要的是肝素诱发的血小板减少症(HIT)和过敏反应。然而,低分子量肝素(LMWH)似乎是一种有效和安全的替代治疗方法。因此,由于良好的药代动力学和副作用,它比UH更受欢迎。直接凝血酶抑制剂(DTI)是一种很有前途的抗凝剂,因为它具有潜在的优势。这篇综述的目的是讨论成人和儿童血栓栓塞的区别,并从药理学作用、剂量、药物反应、药代动力学、相互作用和参数方面综述目前的抗凝剂。这篇综述还强调了儿科新旧抗凝治疗之间的差异。
{"title":"Anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics.","authors":"Mariam K Dabbous,&nbsp;Fouad R Sakr,&nbsp;Diana N Malaeb","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.134947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.134947","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thromboembolic episodes are disorders encountered in both children and adults, but relatively more common in adults. However, the occurrence of venous thromboembolism and use of anticoagulants in pediatrics are increasing. Unfractionated Heparin (UH) is used as a treatment and prevention of thrombosis in adults and critically ill children. Heparin utilization in pediatric is limited by many factors and the most important ones are Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) and anaphylaxis. However, Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) appears to be an effective and safe alternative treatment. Hence, it is preferred over than UH due to favorable pharmacokinetic and side effect profile. Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) is a promising class over the other anticoagulants since it offers potential advantages. The aim of this review is to discuss the differences between adult and pediatric thromboembolism and to review the current anticoagulants in terms of pharmacological action, doses, drug reactions, pharmacokinetics, interactions, and parameters. This review also highlights the differences between old and new anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics. </p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 2","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.134947","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32509214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53
Fixed drug eruptions caused by cross-reactive quinolones. 固定交叉反应喹诺酮类药物引起的药疹。
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.134986
P Deepa Kameswari, Nitya Selvaraj, Mangaiarkkarasi Adhimoolam

Fixed drug eruptions (FDE) are the common dermatological adverse drug reaction accounts for 16-21% of all cutaneous drug reactions in India. Drugs most frequently implicated in FDE are antimicrobials, anticonvulsants, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Here, we report a rare case of bullous FDE due to ciprofloxacin followed by ofloxacin administration.

固定药疹(FDE)是常见的皮肤药物不良反应,占印度所有皮肤药物反应的16-21%。最常涉及FDE的药物是抗菌剂、抗惊厥药和非甾体抗炎药。在这里,我们报告一个罕见的病例大疱性FDE由于环丙沙星,随后氧氟沙星的管理。
{"title":"Fixed drug eruptions caused by cross-reactive quinolones.","authors":"P Deepa Kameswari,&nbsp;Nitya Selvaraj,&nbsp;Mangaiarkkarasi Adhimoolam","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.134986","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.134986","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fixed drug eruptions (FDE) are the common dermatological adverse drug reaction accounts for 16-21% of all cutaneous drug reactions in India. Drugs most frequently implicated in FDE are antimicrobials, anticonvulsants, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Here, we report a rare case of bullous FDE due to ciprofloxacin followed by ofloxacin administration. </p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 2","pages":"54-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.134986","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32509219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Why angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers are not prescribed in the management of hypertension among hemodialysis patients in India. 为什么血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂在印度血液透析患者的高血压管理中不开处方?
Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.134987
Uday Venkat Mateti, Anantha Naik Nagappa, Rajesh Balkrishnan
Despite of well‑established clinical advantages of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) among hemodialysis patients, they are seldom prescribed. The prevalence of end‑stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing in India due to diabetes, hypertension, and ageing population. Hypertension is major morbidity affecting 90% of patients on hemodialysis, which is often poorly controlled. [1] According to Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative clinical practice guidelines, ACEIs and ARBs are the first line choice in chronic kidney disease patients. [2] Numerous clinical studies have been proven the importance of ACEIs and ARBs in reduction of morbidity and mortality; however in India, nephrologists are reluctant and prescribe sparingly ACEIs and ARBs in ESRD patients on hemodialysis. [3,4] This lack of enthusiasm by the nephrologists is attributed to poor infrastructure in terms of monitoring of hyperkalemia, which is mandatory for ACEIs and ARBs regimens. It is a well‑known fact that ACEIs and ARBs were associated with an amplified risk of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients, possibly due to blocking the extra renal potassium loss. [5] Increased levels of potassium in extracellular fluid and serum can cause muscle weakness effecting contraction in skeletal muscle, and in cardiac tissue leading to arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest. Due to poor kidney function, the elimination of ACEIs and ARBs is effected and residence time of these drugs gets effected leading to alteration in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. However, the elimination of various ACEI by hemodialysis is in the order of, lisinopril 50%, benazepril 20‑50%, enalapril 35%, ramipril <30%, fosinopril <10%, captopril (yes) respectively. On the contrary elimination of ARBs is not possible by hemodialysis. [5]
{"title":"Why angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers are not prescribed in the management of hypertension among hemodialysis patients in India.","authors":"Uday Venkat Mateti,&nbsp;Anantha Naik Nagappa,&nbsp;Rajesh Balkrishnan","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.134987","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.134987","url":null,"abstract":"Despite of well‑established clinical advantages of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) among hemodialysis patients, they are seldom prescribed. The prevalence of end‑stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing in India due to diabetes, hypertension, and ageing population. Hypertension is major morbidity affecting 90% of patients on hemodialysis, which is often poorly controlled. [1] According to Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative clinical practice guidelines, ACEIs and ARBs are the first line choice in chronic kidney disease patients. [2] Numerous clinical studies have been proven the importance of ACEIs and ARBs in reduction of morbidity and mortality; however in India, nephrologists are reluctant and prescribe sparingly ACEIs and ARBs in ESRD patients on hemodialysis. [3,4] This lack of enthusiasm by the nephrologists is attributed to poor infrastructure in terms of monitoring of hyperkalemia, which is mandatory for ACEIs and ARBs regimens. It is a well‑known fact that ACEIs and ARBs were associated with an amplified risk of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients, possibly due to blocking the extra renal potassium loss. [5] Increased levels of potassium in extracellular fluid and serum can cause muscle weakness effecting contraction in skeletal muscle, and in cardiac tissue leading to arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest. Due to poor kidney function, the elimination of ACEIs and ARBs is effected and residence time of these drugs gets effected leading to alteration in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. However, the elimination of various ACEI by hemodialysis is in the order of, lisinopril 50%, benazepril 20‑50%, enalapril 35%, ramipril <30%, fosinopril <10%, captopril (yes) respectively. On the contrary elimination of ARBs is not possible by hemodialysis. [5]","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 2","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e1/99/JBCP-5-56.PMC4074698.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32509220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of intern doctors to medication prescribing errors in a Nigeria tertiary hospital. 评估尼日利亚某三级医院实习医生对处方错误的知识和态度。
Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.128244
Adetutu A Ajemigbitse, Moses Kayode Omole, Nnamdi Chika Ezike, Wilson O Erhun

Context: Junior doctors are reported to make most of the prescribing errors in the hospital setting.

Aims: The aim of the following study is to determine the knowledge intern doctors have about prescribing errors and circumstances contributing to making them.

Settings and design: A structured questionnaire was distributed to intern doctors in National Hospital Abuja Nigeria.

Subjects and methods: Respondents gave information about their experience with prescribing medicines, the extent to which they agreed with the definition of a clinically meaningful prescribing error and events that constituted such. Their experience with prescribing certain categories of medicines was also sought.

Statistical analysis used: Data was analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 17 (SPSS Inc Chicago, Ill, USA). Chi-squared analysis contrasted differences in proportions; P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: The response rate was 90.9% and 27 (90%) had <1 year of prescribing experience. 17 (56.7%) respondents totally agreed with the definition of a clinically meaningful prescribing error. Most common reasons for prescribing mistakes were a failure to check prescriptions with a reference source (14, 25.5%) and failure to check for adverse drug interactions (14, 25.5%). Omitting some essential information such as duration of therapy (13, 20%), patient age (14, 21.5%) and dosage errors (14, 21.5%) were the most common types of prescribing errors made. Respondents considered workload (23, 76.7%), multitasking (19, 63.3%), rushing (18, 60.0%) and tiredness/stress (16, 53.3%) as important factors contributing to prescribing errors. Interns were least confident prescribing antibiotics (12, 25.5%), opioid analgesics (12, 25.5%) cytotoxics (10, 21.3%) and antipsychotics (9, 19.1%) unsupervised.

Conclusions: Respondents seemed to have a low awareness of making prescribing errors. Principles of rational prescribing and events that constitute prescribing errors should be taught in the practice setting.

背景:据报道,初级医生在医院的处方错误最多。目的:以下研究的目的是确定实习医生对处方错误的认识以及导致处方错误的情况。环境和设计:向尼日利亚阿布贾国家医院的实习医生分发了一份结构化问卷。受试者和方法:受访者提供了关于他们开处方经验的信息,他们在多大程度上同意临床有意义的处方错误的定义,以及构成这种错误的事件。还询问了他们开某些种类药物的经验。使用统计分析:使用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 17版软件(SPSS Inc Chicago, Ill, USA)对数据进行分析。卡方分析对比了比例差异;P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:回复率为90.9%,有27例(90%)答疑。结论:受访医师对处方失误的认知度较低。应在实践环境中教授合理处方的原则和构成处方错误的事件。
{"title":"Assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of intern doctors to medication prescribing errors in a Nigeria tertiary hospital.","authors":"Adetutu A Ajemigbitse,&nbsp;Moses Kayode Omole,&nbsp;Nnamdi Chika Ezike,&nbsp;Wilson O Erhun","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.128244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.128244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Junior doctors are reported to make most of the prescribing errors in the hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the following study is to determine the knowledge intern doctors have about prescribing errors and circumstances contributing to making them.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>A structured questionnaire was distributed to intern doctors in National Hospital Abuja Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Respondents gave information about their experience with prescribing medicines, the extent to which they agreed with the definition of a clinically meaningful prescribing error and events that constituted such. Their experience with prescribing certain categories of medicines was also sought.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Data was analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 17 (SPSS Inc Chicago, Ill, USA). Chi-squared analysis contrasted differences in proportions; P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 90.9% and 27 (90%) had <1 year of prescribing experience. 17 (56.7%) respondents totally agreed with the definition of a clinically meaningful prescribing error. Most common reasons for prescribing mistakes were a failure to check prescriptions with a reference source (14, 25.5%) and failure to check for adverse drug interactions (14, 25.5%). Omitting some essential information such as duration of therapy (13, 20%), patient age (14, 21.5%) and dosage errors (14, 21.5%) were the most common types of prescribing errors made. Respondents considered workload (23, 76.7%), multitasking (19, 63.3%), rushing (18, 60.0%) and tiredness/stress (16, 53.3%) as important factors contributing to prescribing errors. Interns were least confident prescribing antibiotics (12, 25.5%), opioid analgesics (12, 25.5%) cytotoxics (10, 21.3%) and antipsychotics (9, 19.1%) unsupervised.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respondents seemed to have a low awareness of making prescribing errors. Principles of rational prescribing and events that constitute prescribing errors should be taught in the practice setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 1","pages":"7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.128244","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32324961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Self-medication: A current challenge. 自我药疗:当前的挑战。
Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.128253
Darshana Bennadi

Self-medication is a global phenomenon and potential contributor to human pathogen resistance to antibiotics. The adverse consequences of such practices should always be emphasized to the community and steps to curb it. Rampant irrational use of antimicrobials without medical guidance may result in greater probability of inappropriate, incorrect, or undue therapy, missed diagnosis, delays in appropriate treatment, pathogen resistance and increased morbidity. This review focused on the self-medication of allopathic drugs, their use, its safety and reason for using it. It would be safe, if the people who are using it, have sufficient knowledge about its dose, time of intake, side effect on over dose, but due to lack of information it can cause serious effects such as antibiotic resistance, skin problem, hypersensitivity and allergy. There is need to augment awareness and implement legislations to promote judicious and safe practices. Improved knowledge and understanding about self-medication may result in rationale use and thus limit emerging microbial resistance issues. Articles which were published in peer reviewed journals, World Self-Medication Industry and World Health Organization websites relating to self-medication reviewed.

自我药疗是一种全球性现象,也是人类病原体对抗生素产生耐药性的潜在因素。应始终向社会强调这种做法的不良后果,并采取措施加以制止。在没有医疗指导的情况下,大量不合理使用抗菌素可能导致更大的可能性出现不适当、不正确或不适当的治疗、漏诊、延误适当治疗、病原体耐药性和发病率增加。本文就对抗疗法药物的自我药疗、使用方法、安全性及使用原因作一综述。如果使用它的人对其剂量、摄入时间、过量的副作用有足够的了解,它是安全的,但由于缺乏信息,它可能导致严重的后果,如抗生素耐药性、皮肤问题、过敏和过敏。有必要提高认识并实施立法,以促进明智和安全的做法。提高对自我用药的认识和理解可能会导致合理使用,从而限制新出现的微生物耐药性问题。审查了同行评议期刊、世界自我药疗行业和世界卫生组织网站上发表的有关自我药疗的文章。
{"title":"Self-medication: A current challenge.","authors":"Darshana Bennadi","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.128253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.128253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-medication is a global phenomenon and potential contributor to human pathogen resistance to antibiotics. The adverse consequences of such practices should always be emphasized to the community and steps to curb it. Rampant irrational use of antimicrobials without medical guidance may result in greater probability of inappropriate, incorrect, or undue therapy, missed diagnosis, delays in appropriate treatment, pathogen resistance and increased morbidity. This review focused on the self-medication of allopathic drugs, their use, its safety and reason for using it. It would be safe, if the people who are using it, have sufficient knowledge about its dose, time of intake, side effect on over dose, but due to lack of information it can cause serious effects such as antibiotic resistance, skin problem, hypersensitivity and allergy. There is need to augment awareness and implement legislations to promote judicious and safe practices. Improved knowledge and understanding about self-medication may result in rationale use and thus limit emerging microbial resistance issues. Articles which were published in peer reviewed journals, World Self-Medication Industry and World Health Organization websites relating to self-medication reviewed. </p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 1","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0976-0105.128253","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32324963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 461
期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1