Kareme D Alder, Anthony P Fiegen, Matthew M Rode, Don Bambino Geno Tai, Gina A Suh, Abinash Virk, Nicholas Pulos
Musculoskeletal manifestations of Coxiella burnetii are rare. We describe an elderly, immunosuppressed male with bilateral Coxiella burnetii extensor tenosynovitis treated with incision and debridement and chronic doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine. Additionally, disease etiology, risk factors, pertinent features of the history, testing modalities, and treatment strategies of musculoskeletal Q fever are reviewed.
{"title":"Chronic Q fever presenting as bilateral extensor tenosynovitis: a case report and review of the literature.","authors":"Kareme D Alder, Anthony P Fiegen, Matthew M Rode, Don Bambino Geno Tai, Gina A Suh, Abinash Virk, Nicholas Pulos","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-39-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-39-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Musculoskeletal manifestations of <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> are rare. We describe an elderly, immunosuppressed male with bilateral <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> extensor tenosynovitis treated with incision and debridement and chronic doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine. Additionally, disease etiology, risk factors, pertinent features of the history, testing modalities, and treatment strategies of musculoskeletal Q fever are reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901517/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10681661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leonel Perez Alamino, German Garabano, Joaquín Anibal Rodriguez, Matías Cullari, Hernán Del Sel, Cesar Angel Pesciallo
Background: orthopaedic surgeons still struggle against a devastating complication - periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A two-stage revision is considered the gold standard for chronic PJI for several authors, with success rates over 90 %. This strategy implies the remotion of the prosthesis and the implantation of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer in the joint. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a two-stage revision approach using a commercial prefabricated antibiotic-impregnated cement hip spacer for the treatment of hip PJI regarding monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections. Secondly, to assess risk factors for failure of two-stage revision. Material and methods: we conducted a retrospective study on patients that underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA) between January 2002 and January 20218. We included adult patients with a diagnosis of chronic hip PJI that underwent two-stage revision using a prefabricated gentamicin-impregnated cement of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) hip spacer. We assessed whether it was monomicrobial or polymicrobial infections and comorbidities. Treatment success was defined when eradication of the infection was observed and no further procedures or mortality were registered after the second stage. Persistence or recurrence of infection was considered a failure of treatment. Results: the final series consisted of 84 patients treated with the same hip spacer: 60 (71.4 %) monomicrobial and 24 (28.6 %) polymicrobial joint infections with an overall follow-up of 59.0 (36.0-84.0) months. The overall success rate was 90.5 %. Eight (9.5 %) patients failed. Smoking and BMI greater than 30 m kg were identified independent risk factors for failure in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: our study suggests that prefabricated gentamicin-impregnated PMMA spacer is an effective tool for the treatment of PJI, achieving similar outcomes whether it is monomicrobial or polymicrobial infections. Randomized prospective studies are needed to obtain more reliable conclusions.
背景:骨科医生仍然在与一个毁灭性的并发症-假体周围关节感染(PJI)作斗争。对于一些作者来说,两阶段的修订被认为是慢性PJI的黄金标准,成功率超过90% %。这一策略意味着移除假体并在关节内植入抗生素浸透的水泥垫片。本研究的主要目的是评估两阶段翻修方法的有效性,该方法使用商业预制抗生素浸渍水泥髋关节垫片治疗单微生物和多微生物感染的髋关节PJI。其次,评估两阶段翻修失败的危险因素。材料和方法:我们对2002年1月至2018年1月间接受全髋关节置换术翻修的患者进行了回顾性研究。我们纳入了诊断为慢性髋关节PJI的成年患者,他们使用预制庆大霉素浸渍的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)髋关节垫片进行了两期翻修。我们评估是单微生物感染还是多微生物感染以及合并症。治疗成功的定义是观察到感染被根除,并且在第二阶段之后没有进一步的手术或死亡率记录。感染持续或复发被认为是治疗失败。结果:最终的系列包括84例使用相同髋关节垫片治疗的患者:60例(71.4 %)单微生物关节感染和24例(28.6 %)多微生物关节感染,总随访时间为59.0(36.0-84.0)个月。总成功率为90.5 %。8例(9.5 %)患者失败。在多因素分析中,吸烟和BMI大于30 m kg-2是失败的独立危险因素。结论:我们的研究表明,预制庆大霉素浸渍PMMA间隔剂是治疗PJI的有效工具,无论是单微生物感染还是多微生物感染,效果都相似。需要随机前瞻性研究来获得更可靠的结论。
{"title":"Effectiveness of two-stage revision with commercial polymethylmethacrylate articulated hip spacer: similar outcomes against monomicrobial and polymicrobial hip periprosthetic joint infections.","authors":"Leonel Perez Alamino, German Garabano, Joaquín Anibal Rodriguez, Matías Cullari, Hernán Del Sel, Cesar Angel Pesciallo","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-51-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-51-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: orthopaedic surgeons still struggle against a devastating complication - periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A two-stage revision is considered the gold standard for chronic PJI for several authors, with success rates over 90 %. This strategy implies the remotion of the prosthesis and the implantation of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer in the joint. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a two-stage revision approach using a commercial prefabricated antibiotic-impregnated cement hip spacer for the treatment of hip PJI regarding monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections. Secondly, to assess risk factors for failure of two-stage revision. <b>Material and methods</b>: we conducted a retrospective study on patients that underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA) between January 2002 and January 20218. We included adult patients with a diagnosis of chronic hip PJI that underwent two-stage revision using a prefabricated gentamicin-impregnated cement of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) hip spacer. We assessed whether it was monomicrobial or polymicrobial infections and comorbidities. Treatment success was defined when eradication of the infection was observed and no further procedures or mortality were registered after the second stage. Persistence or recurrence of infection was considered a failure of treatment. <b>Results</b>: the final series consisted of 84 patients treated with the same hip spacer: 60 (71.4 %) monomicrobial and 24 (28.6 %) polymicrobial joint infections with an overall follow-up of 59.0 (36.0-84.0) months. The overall success rate was 90.5 %. Eight (9.5 %) patients failed. Smoking and BMI greater than 30 m kg<math><msup><mi></mi><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math> were identified independent risk factors for failure in multivariate analysis. <b>Conclusion</b>: our study suggests that prefabricated gentamicin-impregnated PMMA spacer is an effective tool for the treatment of PJI, achieving similar outcomes whether it is monomicrobial or polymicrobial infections. Randomized prospective studies are needed to obtain more reliable conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339031/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9879921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: the treatment of infected non-union to allow for bony healing following orthopedic surgery remains a challenge. Antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate (AICS) is an effective vehicle for antibiotic delivery, but its efficacy in treating infected non-union in the setting of trauma and fracture remains unclear. Methods: this systematic review analyses nine studies from 2002 to 2022 that investigated AICS as a local antibiotic delivery system for cases of fracture-related infection and infected non-union. Results: in total, 214 patients who received AICS were included in this review. Of these patients, there were 154 cases of infected non-union or fracture-related infection. Across all studies analyzed, patients treated concurrently with AICS and systemic antibiotics experienced a 92.9 % rate of bony union and a 95.1 % rate of infection eradication. In addition, 100 % of the 13 patients who were treated with AICS alone experienced eradication of infection and successful bony union. Conclusion: AICS is an effective method of antibiotic delivery with a low risk profile that results in high rates of bony union and infection eradication even when used in the absence of systemic antibiotics.
{"title":"The efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate (AICS) in the treatment of infected non-union and fracture-related infection: a systematic review.","authors":"Connor C Jacob, Jad H Daw, Juan Santiago-Torres","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-91-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-91-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: the treatment of infected non-union to allow for bony healing following orthopedic surgery remains a challenge. Antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate (AICS) is an effective vehicle for antibiotic delivery, but its efficacy in treating infected non-union in the setting of trauma and fracture remains unclear. <b>Methods</b>: this systematic review analyses nine studies from 2002 to 2022 that investigated AICS as a local antibiotic delivery system for cases of fracture-related infection and infected non-union. <b>Results</b>: in total, 214 patients who received AICS were included in this review. Of these patients, there were 154 cases of infected non-union or fracture-related infection. Across all studies analyzed, patients treated concurrently with AICS and systemic antibiotics experienced a 92.9 % rate of bony union and a 95.1 % rate of infection eradication. In addition, 100 % of the 13 patients who were treated with AICS alone experienced eradication of infection and successful bony union. <b>Conclusion</b>: AICS is an effective method of antibiotic delivery with a low risk profile that results in high rates of bony union and infection eradication even when used in the absence of systemic antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134749/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9391987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jorrit Willem Adriaan Schoenmakers, Rosanne de Boer, Lilli Gard, Greetje Anna Kampinga, Marleen van Oosten, Jan Maarten van Dijl, Paulus Christiaan Jutte, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
Background: prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE® Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. Methods: synovial fluid samples were collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous, months after arthroplasty) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to infection according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria and culture-based methods as reference standard. Results: a total of 45 samples were analysed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 78-100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity was 83 % (95 % CI: 44-97) for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis ( ), 73 % (95 % CI: 48-89) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI ( ), and 30 % (95 % CI: 11-60) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI ( ). Conclusion: the results of this study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of certain relevant microorganisms, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, from the panel.
{"title":"First evaluation of a commercial multiplex PCR panel for rapid detection of pathogens associated with acute joint infections.","authors":"Jorrit Willem Adriaan Schoenmakers, Rosanne de Boer, Lilli Gard, Greetje Anna Kampinga, Marleen van Oosten, Jan Maarten van Dijl, Paulus Christiaan Jutte, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE<sup>®</sup> Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. <b>Methods</b>: synovial fluid samples were collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous, <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo> <mn>3</mn></mrow> </math> months after arthroplasty) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to infection according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria and culture-based methods as reference standard. <b>Results</b>: a total of 45 samples were analysed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 78-100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity was 83 % (95 % CI: 44-97) for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn></mrow> </math> ), 73 % (95 % CI: 48-89) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>14</mn></mrow> </math> ), and 30 % (95 % CI: 11-60) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>19</mn></mrow> </math> ). <b>Conclusion</b>: the results of this study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of certain relevant microorganisms, such as <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, from the panel.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10681667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sara Elisa Diniz, Ana Ribau, André Vinha, José Carlos Oliveira, Miguel Araújo Abreu, Ricardo Sousa
Introduction: diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging, as no single test has absolute accuracy. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of different simple synovial biomarkers in the diagnosis of PJI as defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). Methods: we retrospectively identified all patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty from 2013 to 2019 on our prospectively maintained database. Only patients with minimum required infection diagnostic workup were included in the study. Patients with comorbidities that may influence the accuracy of synovial biomarkers were excluded. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were utilised to assess the diagnostic utility of synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count, polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage (PMN %), C-reactive protein (CRP), adenosine deaminase (ADA), and alpha-2-microglobulin (A2M). Results: in total, 102 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 58 were classified as infection unlikely, 8 as infection likely, and 36 as infection confirmed. Synovial WBC count (area under the curve (AUC) 0.94) demonstrated the best utility for the diagnosis of PJI, followed by PMN % (AUC 0.91), synovial CRP (AUC 0.90), ADA (AUC 0.82), and A2M (AUC 0.76). We found added value in the combined interpretation of different biomarkers. We calculated high sensitivity and negative predictive value if at least two of them are negative and high specificity and positive predictive value if at least two are elevated. Conclusion: current results show that synovial fluid investigation is a useful tool for the diagnosis of PJI, and the combined interpretation of simple and inexpensive biomarkers demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy.
{"title":"Simple and inexpensive synovial fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection according to the new EBJIS definition.","authors":"Sara Elisa Diniz, Ana Ribau, André Vinha, José Carlos Oliveira, Miguel Araújo Abreu, Ricardo Sousa","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-109-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-109-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging, as no single test has absolute accuracy. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of different simple synovial biomarkers in the diagnosis of PJI as defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). <b>Methods</b>: we retrospectively identified all patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty from 2013 to 2019 on our prospectively maintained database. Only patients with minimum required infection diagnostic workup were included in the study. Patients with comorbidities that may influence the accuracy of synovial biomarkers were excluded. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were utilised to assess the diagnostic utility of synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count, polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage (PMN %), C-reactive protein (CRP), adenosine deaminase (ADA), and alpha-2-microglobulin (A2M). <b>Results</b>: in total, 102 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 58 were classified as infection unlikely, 8 as infection likely, and 36 as infection confirmed. Synovial WBC count (area under the curve (AUC) 0.94) demonstrated the best utility for the diagnosis of PJI, followed by PMN % (AUC 0.91), synovial CRP (AUC 0.90), ADA (AUC 0.82), and A2M (AUC 0.76). We found added value in the combined interpretation of different biomarkers. We calculated high sensitivity and negative predictive value if at least two of them are negative and high specificity and positive predictive value if at least two are elevated. <b>Conclusion</b>: current results show that synovial fluid investigation is a useful tool for the diagnosis of PJI, and the combined interpretation of simple and inexpensive biomarkers demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077577/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9626429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christen Ravn, Jeroen Neyt, Natividad Benito, Miguel Araújo Abreu, Yvonne Achermann, Svetlana Bozhkova, Liselotte Coorevits, Matteo Carlo Ferrari, Karianne Wiger Gammelsrud, Ulf-Joachim Gerlach, Efthymia Giannitsioti, Martin Gottliebsen, Nis Pedersen Jørgensen, Tomislav Madjarevic, Leonard Marais, Aditya Menon, Dirk Jan Moojen, Markus Pääkkönen, Marko Pokorn, Daniel Pérez-Prieto, Nora Renz, Jesús Saavedra-Lozano, Marta Sabater-Martos, Parham Sendi, Staffan Tevell, Charles Vogely, Alex Soriano, The Sanjo Guideline Group
This clinical guideline is intended for use by orthopedic surgeons and physicians who care for patients with possible or documented septic arthritis of a native joint (SANJO). It includes evidence and opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with SANJO.
{"title":"Guideline for management of septic arthritis in native joints (SANJO).","authors":"Christen Ravn, Jeroen Neyt, Natividad Benito, Miguel Araújo Abreu, Yvonne Achermann, Svetlana Bozhkova, Liselotte Coorevits, Matteo Carlo Ferrari, Karianne Wiger Gammelsrud, Ulf-Joachim Gerlach, Efthymia Giannitsioti, Martin Gottliebsen, Nis Pedersen Jørgensen, Tomislav Madjarevic, Leonard Marais, Aditya Menon, Dirk Jan Moojen, Markus Pääkkönen, Marko Pokorn, Daniel Pérez-Prieto, Nora Renz, Jesús Saavedra-Lozano, Marta Sabater-Martos, Parham Sendi, Staffan Tevell, Charles Vogely, Alex Soriano, The Sanjo Guideline Group","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-29-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-29-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This clinical guideline is intended for use by orthopedic surgeons and physicians who care for patients with possible or documented septic arthritis of a native joint (SANJO). It includes evidence and opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with SANJO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901514/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10689689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christin A Tiegs-Heiden, Tanner C Anderson, Mark S Collins, Matthew P Johnson, Douglas R Osmon, Doris E Wenger
Objective: confluent T1 hypointense marrow signal is widely accepted to represent osteomyelitis on MRI. Some authors have suggested that non-confluent bone marrow signal abnormality should be considered early osteomyelitis. The purpose of this study was to address this issue by comparing the rate of osteomyelitis and amputation based on T1 marrow signal characteristics. Materials and methods: a total of 112 patients who underwent MRI of the foot for the evaluation of possible osteomyelitis were included. Patients were assigned to confluent T1 hypointense, reticulated T1 hypointense, and normal bone marrow signal groups. Results: patients with confluent T1 hypointense signal on MRI had significantly higher rates of osteomyelitis and amputation at 2 and 14 months post-MRI than the reticulated T1 hypointense group ( ). Six patients had normal T1 signal, 16.7 % of whom had osteomyelitis and underwent amputation by 2 months post-MRI. Of 61 patients with reticulated T1 hypointense signal, 19.7 % had a diagnosis of osteomyelitis at 2 months post-MRI and 30.8 % had a diagnosis of osteomyelitis at 14 months post-MRI; moreover, 14.8 % and 31.5 % underwent amputation by 2 and 14 months post-MRI, respectively. Of 45 patients with confluent T1 hypointense signal, 73.3 % of patients had osteomyelitis at 2 months post-MRI and 82.5 % had osteomyelitis at 14 months post-MRI. In this group, 66.7 % underwent amputation by 2 months post-MRI and 77.8 % underwent amputation by 14 months post-MRI. Conclusions: over half of the patients with suspected pedal osteomyelitis who had reticulated or normal T1 bone marrow signal on MRI healed with conservative measures. Therefore, we recommend terminology such as "osteitis", "reactive osteitis", or "nonspecific reactive change" to describe bone marrow edema-like signal and reticulated hazy T1 hypointense signal without associated confluent T1 hypointensity. Moreover, we recommend that the MRI diagnosis of osteomyelitis is reserved for confluent T1 hypointense bone signal in the area of concern.
{"title":"Outcomes in patients with clinically suspected pedal osteomyelitis based on bone marrow signal pattern on MRI.","authors":"Christin A Tiegs-Heiden, Tanner C Anderson, Mark S Collins, Matthew P Johnson, Douglas R Osmon, Doris E Wenger","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-99-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-99-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: confluent T1 hypointense marrow signal is widely accepted to represent osteomyelitis on MRI. Some authors have suggested that non-confluent bone marrow signal abnormality should be considered early osteomyelitis. The purpose of this study was to address this issue by comparing the rate of osteomyelitis and amputation based on T1 marrow signal characteristics. <b>Materials and methods</b>: a total of 112 patients who underwent MRI of the foot for the evaluation of possible osteomyelitis were included. Patients were assigned to confluent T1 hypointense, reticulated T1 hypointense, and normal bone marrow signal groups. <b>Results</b>: patients with confluent T1 hypointense signal on MRI had significantly higher rates of osteomyelitis and amputation at 2 and 14 months post-MRI than the reticulated T1 hypointense group ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ). Six patients had normal T1 signal, 16.7 % of whom had osteomyelitis and underwent amputation by 2 months post-MRI. Of 61 patients with reticulated T1 hypointense signal, 19.7 % had a diagnosis of osteomyelitis at 2 months post-MRI and 30.8 % had a diagnosis of osteomyelitis at 14 months post-MRI; moreover, 14.8 % and 31.5 % underwent amputation by 2 and 14 months post-MRI, respectively. Of 45 patients with confluent T1 hypointense signal, 73.3 % of patients had osteomyelitis at 2 months post-MRI and 82.5 % had osteomyelitis at 14 months post-MRI. In this group, 66.7 % underwent amputation by 2 months post-MRI and 77.8 % underwent amputation by 14 months post-MRI. <b>Conclusions</b>: over half of the patients with suspected pedal osteomyelitis who had reticulated or normal T1 bone marrow signal on MRI healed with conservative measures. Therefore, we recommend terminology such as \"osteitis\", \"reactive osteitis\", or \"nonspecific reactive change\" to describe bone marrow edema-like signal and reticulated hazy T1 hypointense signal without associated confluent T1 hypointensity. Moreover, we recommend that the MRI diagnosis of osteomyelitis is reserved for confluent T1 hypointense bone signal in the area of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134750/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9398085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cristian Balcescu, Khalid Odeh, Alexander Rosinski, Brandon Nudelman, Adam Schlauch, Ishan Shah, Victor Ungurean, Priya Prasad, Jeremi Leasure, Flora Stepansky, Amit Piple, Dimitriy Kondrashov
Study design: retrospective case series. Objective: the presenting clinical symptoms of spinal infections are often nonspecific and a delay in diagnosis can lead to adverse patient outcomes. The morbidity and mortality of patients with multifocal spinal infections is significantly higher compared to unifocal infections. The purpose of the current study was to analyse the risk factors for multifocal spinal infections. Methods: we conducted a retrospective review of all pyogenic non-tuberculous spinal infections treated surgically at a single tertiary care medical center from 2006-2020. The medical records, imaging studies, and laboratory data of 43 patients during this time period were reviewed and analysed after receiving Institutional Review Board approval. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a multifocal spinal infection. Results: 15 patients (35 %) had multifocal infections. In univariate analysis, there was a significant association with chronic kidney disease ( ), gender ( ), a white blood cell count ( ), and cervical ( ) or thoracic ( .001) involvement. In multivariate analysis, both cervical and thoracic involvement remained statistically significant ( and , respectively). Conclusions: patients with infections in the thoracic or cervical region are more likely to have a multifocal infection. Multifocal pyogenic spinal infections remain a common entity and a total spine MRI should be performed to aid in prompt diagnosis.
{"title":"Pyogenic spinal infections warrant a total spine MRI.","authors":"Cristian Balcescu, Khalid Odeh, Alexander Rosinski, Brandon Nudelman, Adam Schlauch, Ishan Shah, Victor Ungurean, Priya Prasad, Jeremi Leasure, Flora Stepansky, Amit Piple, Dimitriy Kondrashov","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-1-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-1-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Study design</b>: retrospective case series. <b>Objective</b>: the presenting clinical symptoms of spinal infections are often nonspecific and a delay in diagnosis can lead to adverse patient outcomes. The morbidity and mortality of patients with multifocal spinal infections is significantly higher compared to unifocal infections. The purpose of the current study was to analyse the risk factors for multifocal spinal infections. <b>Methods</b>: we conducted a retrospective review of all pyogenic non-tuberculous spinal infections treated surgically at a single tertiary care medical center from 2006-2020. The medical records, imaging studies, and laboratory data of 43 patients during this time period were reviewed and analysed after receiving Institutional Review Board approval. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a multifocal spinal infection. <b>Results</b>: 15 patients (35 %) had multifocal infections. In univariate analysis, there was a significant association with chronic kidney disease ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.040</mn></mrow> </math> ), gender ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.003</mn></mrow> </math> ), a white blood cell count ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.011</mn></mrow> </math> ), and cervical ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ) or thoracic ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn></mrow> </math> .001) involvement. In multivariate analysis, both cervical and thoracic involvement remained statistically significant ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> and <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> , respectively). <b>Conclusions</b>: patients with infections in the thoracic or cervical region are more likely to have a multifocal infection. Multifocal pyogenic spinal infections remain a common entity and a total spine MRI should be performed to aid in prompt diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850241/pdf/jbji-8-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9134269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah R Blumenthal, Adnan N Cheema, Steven E Zhang, Benjamin L Gray, Nikolas H Kazmers
Upper extremity abscesses frequently present to the acute care setting with inconclusive physical examination and imaging findings. We sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers including white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify subjects years treated with surgical debridement of upper extremity abscesses at our institution between January 2012 and December 2015. In this study, 188 patients were screened, and 72 met the inclusion criteria. A confirmed abscess as defined by culture positivity was present in 67 (93.1 %) cases. The sensitivity of WBC, ESR, or CRP individually was 0.45, 0.71, and 0.81. The specificity of WBC, ESR, or CRP individually was 0.80, 0.80, and 0.40. In combination all three markers when positive had a sensitivity of 0.26 and specificity of 1.0. These values were similar among patients with diabetes and those with obesity. With the highest sensitivity and lowest specificity, CRP exhibited the most utility as a screening test (level IV).
{"title":"Evaluating the utility of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of soft tissue abscesses of the forearm and hand.","authors":"Sarah R Blumenthal, Adnan N Cheema, Steven E Zhang, Benjamin L Gray, Nikolas H Kazmers","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-119-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-119-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upper extremity abscesses frequently present to the acute care setting with inconclusive physical examination and imaging findings. We sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers including white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify subjects <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo> <mn>18</mn></mrow> </math> years treated with surgical debridement of upper extremity abscesses at our institution between January 2012 and December 2015. In this study, 188 patients were screened, and 72 met the inclusion criteria. A confirmed abscess as defined by culture positivity was present in 67 (93.1 %) cases. The sensitivity of WBC, ESR, or CRP individually was 0.45, 0.71, and 0.81. The specificity of WBC, ESR, or CRP individually was 0.80, 0.80, and 0.40. In combination all three markers when positive had a sensitivity of 0.26 and specificity of 1.0. These values were similar among patients with diabetes and those with obesity. With the highest sensitivity and lowest specificity, CRP exhibited the most utility as a screening test (level IV).</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077572/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9626427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eibhlin Higgins, Don Bambino Geno Tai, Brian Lahr, Gina A Suh, Elie F Berbari, Kevin I Perry, Matthew P Abdel, Aaron J Tande
Abstract Background: Differences in susceptibility and response to infection between males and females are well established. Despite this, sex-specific analyses are under-reported in the medical literature, and there is a paucity of literature looking at differences between male and female patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Whether there are sex-specific differences in presentation, treatment tolerability, and outcomes in PJI has not been widely evaluated. Methods: We undertook a retrospective case-matched analysis of patients with staphylococcal PJI managed with two-stage exchange arthroplasty. To control for differences other than sex which may influence outcome or presentation, males and females were matched for age group, causative organism category (coagulase-negative staphylococci vs. Staphylococcus aureus), and joint involved (hip vs. knee). Results: We identified 156 patients in 78 pairs of males and females who were successfully matched. There were no significant baseline differences by sex, except for greater use of chronic immunosuppression among females (16.4 % vs. 4.1 %; p=0.012 ). We did not detect any statistically significant differences in outcomes between the two groups. Among the 156 matched patients, 16 recurrent infections occurred during a median follow-up time of 2.9 (IQR 1.5–5.3) years. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 16.1 % for females, compared with 8.8 % for males ( p=0.434 ). Conclusions: Success rates for PJI treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty are high, consistent with previously reported literature. This retrospective case-matched study did not detect a significant difference in outcome between males and females with staphylococcal PJI who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty.
{"title":"Sex-specific analysis of clinical features and outcomes in staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections managed with two-stage exchange arthroplasty.","authors":"Eibhlin Higgins, Don Bambino Geno Tai, Brian Lahr, Gina A Suh, Elie F Berbari, Kevin I Perry, Matthew P Abdel, Aaron J Tande","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-125-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-125-2023","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Differences in susceptibility and response to infection between males and females are well established. Despite this, sex-specific analyses are under-reported in the medical literature, and there is a paucity of literature looking at differences between male and female patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Whether there are sex-specific differences in presentation, treatment tolerability, and outcomes in PJI has not been widely evaluated. Methods: We undertook a retrospective case-matched analysis of patients with staphylococcal PJI managed with two-stage exchange arthroplasty. To control for differences other than sex which may influence outcome or presentation, males and females were matched for age group, causative organism category (coagulase-negative staphylococci vs. Staphylococcus aureus), and joint involved (hip vs. knee). Results: We identified 156 patients in 78 pairs of males and females who were successfully matched. There were no significant baseline differences by sex, except for greater use of chronic immunosuppression among females (16.4 % vs. 4.1 %; p=0.012 ). We did not detect any statistically significant differences in outcomes between the two groups. Among the 156 matched patients, 16 recurrent infections occurred during a median follow-up time of 2.9 (IQR 1.5–5.3) years. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 16.1 % for females, compared with 8.8 % for males ( p=0.434 ). Conclusions: Success rates for PJI treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty are high, consistent with previously reported literature. This retrospective case-matched study did not detect a significant difference in outcome between males and females with staphylococcal PJI who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty.","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134758/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9398086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}