首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Bone and Joint Infection最新文献

英文 中文
One-year infection control rates of a DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) procedure after primary and prosthetic-joint-infection-related revision arthroplasty - a retrospective cohort study. 原发性和假体关节感染相关翻修关节置换术后DAIR(清创、抗生素和植入物保留)手术一年感染控制率的回顾性队列研究
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2021-01-27 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-91-2021
F Ruben H A Nurmohamed, Bruce van Dijk, Ewout S Veltman, Marrit Hoekstra, Rob J Rentenaar, Harrie H Weinans, H Charles Vogely, Bart C H van der Wal

Introduction: Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedures are effective treatments for acute postoperative or acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infections. However, literature reporting on the effectiveness of DAIR procedures performed after a one- or two-stage revision because of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (PJI-related revision arthroplasty) is scarce. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the infection control after 1 year of a DAIR procedure in the case of an early postoperative infection either after primary arthroplasty or after PJI-related revision arthroplasty. Materials and methods: All patients treated with a DAIR procedure within 3 months after onset of PJI between 2009 and 2017 were retrospectively included. Data were collected on patient and infection characteristics. All infections were confirmed by applying the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2014 criteria. The primary outcome was successful control of infection at 1 year after a DAIR procedure, which was defined as the absence of clinical signs, such as pain, swelling, and erythema; radiological signs, such as protheses loosening; or laboratory signs, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) ( < 10 ) with no use of antibiotic therapy. Results: Sixty-seven patients were treated with a DAIR procedure (41 hips and 26 knees). Successful infection control rates of a DAIR procedure after primary arthroplasty ( n = 51 ) and after prior PJI-related revision arthroplasty ( n = 16 ) were 69 % and 56 %, respectively ( p = 0.38 ). The successful infection control rates of a DAIR procedure after an early acute infection ( n = 35 ) and after a hematogenous infection ( n = 16 ) following primary arthroplasty were both 69 % ( p = 1.00 ). Conclusion: In this limited study population, no statistically significant difference is found in infection control after 1 year between DAIR procedures after primary arthroplasty and PJI-related revision arthroplasty.

简介:清创,抗生素和种植体保留(DAIR)程序是有效的治疗急性术后或急性血行性假体周围关节感染。然而,由于假体关节感染(PJI) (PJI相关翻修关节置换术)而进行一期或两期翻修后DAIR手术的有效性的文献报道很少。本研究的目的是回顾性评估原发性关节置换术或pji相关翻修关节置换术后早期感染的DAIR手术后1年的感染控制情况。材料和方法:回顾性纳入2009年至2017年PJI发病后3个月内接受DAIR手术治疗的所有患者。收集患者和感染特征的数据。所有感染均采用肌肉骨骼感染学会(MSIS) 2014年标准确诊。主要结局是在DAIR手术后1年成功控制感染,其定义为没有临床症状,如疼痛、肿胀和红斑;放射学征象,如假体松动;或实验室体征,如c反应蛋白(CRP)(10),不使用抗生素治疗。结果:67例患者接受了DAIR手术(41髋和26膝)。初次关节置换术(n = 51)和先前pji相关翻修关节置换术(n = 16)后DAIR手术成功感染控制率分别为69 %和56 % (p = 0.38)。早期急性感染(n = 35)和原发性关节置换术后血液感染(n = 16)后DAIR手术的成功感染控制率均为69 % (p = 1.00)。结论:在这个有限的研究人群中,原发性关节置换术后DAIR手术和pji相关翻修关节置换术后1年感染控制没有统计学上的显著差异。
{"title":"One-year infection control rates of a DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) procedure after primary and prosthetic-joint-infection-related revision arthroplasty - a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"F Ruben H A Nurmohamed,&nbsp;Bruce van Dijk,&nbsp;Ewout S Veltman,&nbsp;Marrit Hoekstra,&nbsp;Rob J Rentenaar,&nbsp;Harrie H Weinans,&nbsp;H Charles Vogely,&nbsp;Bart C H van der Wal","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-91-2021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-91-2021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedures are effective treatments for acute postoperative or acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infections. However, literature reporting on the effectiveness of DAIR procedures performed after a one- or two-stage revision because of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (PJI-related revision arthroplasty) is scarce. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the infection control after 1 year of a DAIR procedure in the case of an early postoperative infection either after primary arthroplasty or after PJI-related revision arthroplasty. <b>Materials and methods</b>: All patients treated with a DAIR procedure within 3 months after onset of PJI between 2009 and 2017 were retrospectively included. Data were collected on patient and infection characteristics. All infections were confirmed by applying the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2014 criteria. The primary outcome was successful control of infection at 1 year after a DAIR procedure, which was defined as the absence of clinical signs, such as pain, swelling, and erythema; radiological signs, such as protheses loosening; or laboratory signs, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) ( <math><mrow><mo><</mo> <mn>10</mn></mrow> </math> ) with no use of antibiotic therapy. <b>Results</b>: Sixty-seven patients were treated with a DAIR procedure (41 hips and 26 knees). Successful infection control rates of a DAIR procedure after primary arthroplasty ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>51</mn></mrow> </math> ) and after prior PJI-related revision arthroplasty ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>16</mn></mrow> </math> ) were 69 % and 56 %, respectively ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.38</mn></mrow> </math> ). The successful infection control rates of a DAIR procedure after an early acute infection ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>35</mn></mrow> </math> ) and after a hematogenous infection ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>16</mn></mrow> </math> ) following primary arthroplasty were both 69 % ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.00</mn></mrow> </math> ). <b>Conclusion</b>: In this limited study population, no statistically significant difference is found in infection control after 1 year between DAIR procedures after primary arthroplasty and PJI-related revision arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 4","pages":"91-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129908/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39075882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Bioactive glass S53P4 vs. autologous bone graft for filling defects in patients with chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-unions - a single center experience. 生物活性玻璃S53P4与自体骨移植填充慢性骨髓炎和感染性骨不连患者的缺损-单中心经验
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2021-01-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-73-2021
Eva Steinhausen, Rolf Lefering, Martin Glombitza, Nikolaus Brinkmann, Carsten Vogel, Bastian Mester, Marcel Dudda

Introduction: The goals of osteomyelitis therapy are successful control of infection and reconstruction of the bone. The gold standard for filling defects is the autologous bone graft. Bioactive glass S53P4 is an inorganic bone substitute. We compared the outcome of using bioactive glass (BAG) versus autologous bone graft (AB) in patients with infected non-union. Methods: Patients with chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-union who received either bioactive glass or autologous bone grafts between 2013 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was successful control of infection during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were bone healing, functional outcome, and occurrence of complications. Results: Eighty-three patients were analyzed (BAG n = 51 , AB n = 32 ). Twenty-one patients experienced reinfection (BAG n = 15 , 29 %; AB n = 6 , 19 %). Seventy-eight patients achieved full weight bearing (BAG n = 47 , 92 %; AB n = 31 , 97 %). Sixty-four patients had complete bone healing at the end of the follow-up period (BAG n = 39 , 77 %; AB n = 25 , 78 %). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the primary or secondary endpoints. Patients with multidrug-resistant pathogens had a significantly higher rate of incomplete bone healing ( p = 0 .033) and a 3-fold higher risk of complications in both groups. Conclusions: Bioactive glass appears to be a suitable bone substitute not only for successful control of infection and defect filling but also for bone healing in cases of infected non-union. In our study, bioactive glass was neither superior nor inferior to autologous bone graft with regard to the primary and secondary endpoints. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are required.

导言:骨髓炎治疗的目标是成功控制感染和骨重建。自体骨移植是填补缺损的金标准。生物活性玻璃S53P4是一种无机骨替代品。我们比较了使用生物活性玻璃(BAG)和自体骨移植(AB)治疗感染性骨不连患者的结果。方法:回顾性分析2013 - 2017年接受生物活性玻璃骨或自体骨移植的慢性骨髓炎和感染性骨不连患者。主要终点是随访期间感染的成功控制。次要终点是骨愈合、功能结局和并发症的发生。结果:共分析83例患者(BAG = 51, AB = 32)。再感染21例(BAG = 15, 29 %;AB n = 6,19 %)。78例患者实现完全负重(BAG n = 47, 92 %;AB n = 31,97 %)。随访结束时,64例患者骨完全愈合(BAG n = 39, 77 %;AB n = 25,78 %)。在主要终点和次要终点方面,两组之间没有显著差异。具有多药耐药病原体的患者骨不完全愈合率明显更高(p = 0.033),两组并发症风险均高出3倍。结论:生物活性玻璃是一种合适的骨替代物,不仅可以成功控制感染和缺损填充,而且可以在感染不愈合的情况下实现骨愈合。在我们的研究中,生物活性玻璃在主要和次要终点方面既不优于也不逊于自体骨移植物。需要对更多患者进行进一步的研究。
{"title":"Bioactive glass S53P4 vs. autologous bone graft for filling defects in patients with chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-unions - a single center experience.","authors":"Eva Steinhausen,&nbsp;Rolf Lefering,&nbsp;Martin Glombitza,&nbsp;Nikolaus Brinkmann,&nbsp;Carsten Vogel,&nbsp;Bastian Mester,&nbsp;Marcel Dudda","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-73-2021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-73-2021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: The goals of osteomyelitis therapy are successful control of infection and reconstruction of the bone. The gold standard for filling defects is the autologous bone graft. Bioactive glass S53P4 is an inorganic bone substitute. We compared the outcome of using bioactive glass (BAG) versus autologous bone graft (AB) in patients with infected non-union. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-union who received either bioactive glass or autologous bone grafts between 2013 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was successful control of infection during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were bone healing, functional outcome, and occurrence of complications. <b>Results</b>: Eighty-three patients were analyzed (BAG <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>51</mn></mrow> </math> , AB <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>32</mn></mrow> </math> ). Twenty-one patients experienced reinfection (BAG <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn></mrow> </math> , 29 %; AB <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn></mrow> </math> , 19 %). Seventy-eight patients achieved full weight bearing (BAG <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>47</mn></mrow> </math> , 92 %; AB <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>31</mn></mrow> </math> , 97 %). Sixty-four patients had complete bone healing at the end of the follow-up period (BAG <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>39</mn></mrow> </math> , 77 %; AB <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>25</mn></mrow> </math> , 78 %). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the primary or secondary endpoints. Patients with multidrug-resistant pathogens had a significantly higher rate of incomplete bone healing ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn></mrow> </math> .033) and a 3-fold higher risk of complications in both groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Bioactive glass appears to be a suitable bone substitute not only for successful control of infection and defect filling but also for bone healing in cases of infected non-union. In our study, bioactive glass was neither superior nor inferior to autologous bone graft with regard to the primary and secondary endpoints. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 4","pages":"73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39075880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Outcomes of the gastrocnemius flap performed by orthopaedic surgeons in salvage revision knee arthroplasty. 腓肠肌皮瓣在修复性膝关节置换术中的应用效果。
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-425-2021
Robert Allan McCulloch, Amirul Adlan, Scott Evans, Michael Parry, Jonathan Stevenson, Lee Jeys

Introduction: The gastrocnemius myofascial flap is used to manage soft-tissue defects over the anterior aspect of the knee in the context of a patient presenting with a sinus and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or extensor mechanism failure. The aim of this study was twofold: firstly, to evaluate the outcomes of gastrocnemius flaps performed by appropriately trained orthopaedic surgeons in the context of PJI and, secondly, to evaluate the infection-free survival of this patient group. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent gastrocnemius flap reconstruction during staged revision total knee arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection (PJI). All flaps were performed by an orthopaedic surgeon with orthoplastics training. Patients had a mean age of 68.9 years (range 50-84) and were followed up for a mean of 50.4 months (range 2-128 months). A total of 29 patients (97 %) were categorized into Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) local extremity grade 3 (greater than two compromising factors), and 52 % of PJIs were polymicrobial. The primary outcome measure was flap failure, and the secondary outcome measure was recurrent infection. Results: Flap survival was 100 % with no failures or early returns to theatre for flap problems such as necrosis or haematoma. Overall infection-free survival during the study period was 48 % (13 of 27 infected cases). Using limb salvage as the outcome, 77 % (23 of 30 patients) retained the limb. Infection recurrence occurred in 48 % (10 patients) in the type B3 cohort and 67 % (4 patients) in the type C3 cohort ( p = 0.65 ). Conclusions: The surgical technique for a gastrocnemius myofascial flap is reliable and reproducible when performed by appropriately trained orthopaedic surgeons, even in high-risk groups. However, the risks of recurrent infection and amputation remain high within our series due to poor host and extremity factors.

简介:腓肠肌肌筋膜瓣用于治疗膝关节前部软组织缺损,患者表现为窦性和假体周围关节感染(PJI)或伸肌机制失效。本研究的目的有两个:首先,评估经过适当培训的骨科医生在PJI背景下进行腓肠肌皮瓣的效果,其次,评估该患者组的无感染生存。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了30例在假关节感染(PJI)的分期翻修全膝关节置换术中接受腓肠肌瓣重建的患者。所有皮瓣均由受过整形外科训练的整形外科医生完成。患者平均年龄为68.9岁(50-84岁),平均随访时间为50.4个月(2-128个月)。共有29名患者(97% %)被分类为肌肉骨骼感染学会(MSIS)局部肢体3级(大于两个折衷因素),52% %的PJIs是多微生物。主要结局指标为皮瓣衰竭,次要结局指标为复发感染。结果:皮瓣成活率为100% %,没有因皮瓣坏死或血肿等问题而失败或早期返回手术室。在研究期间,总体无感染生存率为48% %(27例感染病例中有13例)。以肢体保留为结果,77. %(30例患者中的23例)保留肢体。B3型队列中感染复发率为48 %(10例),C3型队列中感染复发率为67 %(4例)(p = 0.65)。结论:腓肠肌筋膜瓣的手术技术是可靠的和可重复的,当经过适当训练的骨科医生,即使在高危人群。然而,在我们的研究中,由于宿主和肢体因素不佳,复发感染和截肢的风险仍然很高。
{"title":"Outcomes of the gastrocnemius flap performed by orthopaedic surgeons in salvage revision knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Robert Allan McCulloch,&nbsp;Amirul Adlan,&nbsp;Scott Evans,&nbsp;Michael Parry,&nbsp;Jonathan Stevenson,&nbsp;Lee Jeys","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-425-2021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-425-2021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: The gastrocnemius myofascial flap is used to manage soft-tissue defects over the anterior aspect of the knee in the context of a patient presenting with a sinus and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or extensor mechanism failure. The aim of this study was twofold: firstly, to evaluate the outcomes of gastrocnemius flaps performed by appropriately trained orthopaedic surgeons in the context of PJI and, secondly, to evaluate the infection-free survival of this patient group. <b>Patients and methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent gastrocnemius flap reconstruction during staged revision total knee arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection (PJI). All flaps were performed by an orthopaedic surgeon with orthoplastics training. Patients had a mean age of 68.9 years (range 50-84) and were followed up for a mean of 50.4 months (range 2-128 months). A total of 29 patients (97 %) were categorized into Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) local extremity grade 3 (greater than two compromising factors), and 52 % of PJIs were polymicrobial. The primary outcome measure was flap failure, and the secondary outcome measure was recurrent infection. <b>Results</b>: Flap survival was 100 % with no failures or early returns to theatre for flap problems such as necrosis or haematoma. Overall infection-free survival during the study period was 48 % (13 of 27 infected cases). Using limb salvage as the outcome, 77 % (23 of 30 patients) retained the limb. Infection recurrence occurred in 48 % (10 patients) in the type B3 cohort and 67 % (4 patients) in the type C3 cohort ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.65</mn></mrow> </math> ). <b>Conclusions</b>: The surgical technique for a gastrocnemius myofascial flap is reliable and reproducible when performed by appropriately trained orthopaedic surgeons, even in high-risk groups. However, the risks of recurrent infection and amputation remain high within our series due to poor host and extremity factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 9","pages":"425-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720735/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10423250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Simultaneous debridement, Ilizarov reconstruction and free muscle flaps in the management of complex tibial infection. 同时清创,Ilizarov重建和游离肌瓣治疗复杂胫骨感染。
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2020-12-22 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-63-2020
Max Mifsud, Jamie Y Ferguson, David A Stubbs, Alex J Ramsden, Martin A McNally

Chronic bone infections often present with complex bone and soft tissue loss. Management is difficult and commonly delivered in multiple stages over many months. This study investigated the feasibility and clinical outcomes of reconstruction in one stage. Fifty-seven consecutive patients with chronic osteomyelitis ( n = 27 ) or infected non-union ( n = 30 ) were treated with simultaneous debridement, Ilizarov method and free muscle flap transfer. 41 patients (71.9 %) had systemic co-morbidities (Cierny-Mader group Bs hosts). Infection was confirmed with strict criteria. 48 patients (84.2 %) had segmental defects. The primary outcome was eradication of infection at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included bone union, flap survival and complications or re-operation related to the reconstruction. Infection was eradicated in 55 / 57 cases (96.5 %) at a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 12-146). No flap failures occurred during distraction but 6 required early anastomotic revision and 3 were not salvageable (flap failure rate 5.3 %). Bony union was achieved in 52 / 57 (91.2 %) with the initial surgery alone. After treatment of the five un-united docking sites, all cases achieved bony union at final follow-up. Simultaneous reconstruction with Ilizarov method and free tissue transfer is safe but requires careful planning and logistic considerations. The outcomes from this study are equivalent or better than those reported after staged surgery.

慢性骨感染通常表现为复杂的骨和软组织损失。管理是困难的,并且通常在多个月的多个阶段交付。本研究探讨一期重建的可行性及临床效果。对57例慢性骨髓炎患者(27例)或感染性骨不连患者(30例)进行同步清创、Ilizarov法和游离肌瓣转移治疗。41例患者(71.9 %)出现全身性合并症(cierney - mader b组宿主)。按照严格的标准确诊感染。48例(84.2 %)存在节段性缺损。最后随访时主要结局为感染根除。次要结果包括骨愈合、皮瓣存活以及与重建相关的并发症或再手术。平均随访36个月(12 ~ 146个月),57例患者中有55例(96.5 %)感染根除。牵张术中无皮瓣失效,6例需要早期吻合口修复,3例不能修复(皮瓣失败率5.3% %)。52 / 57(91.2 %)的患者在初次手术后骨愈合。经治疗5个不愈合的对接部位后,所有病例在最后随访时均实现骨愈合。同时重建伊利扎罗夫法和自由组织移植是安全的,但需要仔细的规划和后勤考虑。本研究的结果与分期手术后的结果相当或更好。
{"title":"Simultaneous debridement, Ilizarov reconstruction and free muscle flaps in the management of complex tibial infection.","authors":"Max Mifsud,&nbsp;Jamie Y Ferguson,&nbsp;David A Stubbs,&nbsp;Alex J Ramsden,&nbsp;Martin A McNally","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-63-2020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-63-2020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic bone infections often present with complex bone and soft tissue loss. Management is difficult and commonly delivered in multiple stages over many months. This study investigated the feasibility and clinical outcomes of reconstruction in one stage. Fifty-seven consecutive patients with chronic osteomyelitis ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>27</mn></mrow> </math> ) or infected non-union ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>30</mn></mrow> </math> ) were treated with simultaneous debridement, Ilizarov method and free muscle flap transfer. 41 patients (71.9 %) had systemic co-morbidities (Cierny-Mader group Bs hosts). Infection was confirmed with strict criteria. 48 patients (84.2 %) had segmental defects. The primary outcome was eradication of infection at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included bone union, flap survival and complications or re-operation related to the reconstruction. Infection was eradicated in <math><mrow><mn>55</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mn>57</mn></mrow> </math> cases (96.5 %) at a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 12-146). No flap failures occurred during distraction but 6 required early anastomotic revision and 3 were not salvageable (flap failure rate 5.3 %). Bony union was achieved in <math><mrow><mn>52</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mn>57</mn></mrow> </math> (91.2 %) with the initial surgery alone. After treatment of the five un-united docking sites, all cases achieved bony union at final follow-up. Simultaneous reconstruction with Ilizarov method and free tissue transfer is safe but requires careful planning and logistic considerations. The outcomes from this study are equivalent or better than those reported after staged surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 3","pages":"63-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852407/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25341792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Using implementation science to develop and implement a guideline to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to elective arthroplasty. 利用实施科学制定和实施指南,减少择期关节置换术前不必要的无症状菌尿术前检测。
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2020-12-21 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-57-2020
Judith S L Partridge, Madeleine Daly, Carolyn Hemsley, Zameer Shah, Krishanthi Sathanandan, Cathryn Mainwaring, Jugdeep K Dhesi

Introduction: Guidelines and consensus statements do not support routine preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) prior to elective arthroplasty. Despite this, urine testing remains commonplace in orthopaedic practice. This mixed methods stepwise quality improvement project aimed to develop and implement a guideline to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to elective arthroplasty within a single centre. Methods: Step 1 - description of current practice in preoperative urine testing prior to arthroplasty within a single centre; Step 2 - examination of the association between preoperative urine culture and pathogens causing prosthetic joint infection (PJI); Step 3 - co-design of a guideline to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to elective arthroplasty; Step 4 - implementation of a sustainable guideline to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to elective arthroplasty. Results: Retrospective chart review showed inconsistency in mid-stream urine (MSU) testing prior to elective arthroplasty (49 % preoperative MSU sent) and in antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection (UTI) and ASB. No association was observed between organisms isolated from urine and joint aspirate in confirmed cases of PJI. Co-design of a guideline and decision support tool supported through an implementation strategy resulted in rapid uptake and adherence. Sustainability was demonstrated at 6 months. Conclusion: In this stepwise study, implementation science methodology was used to challenge outdated clinical practice, achieving a sustained reduction in unnecessary preoperative urine testing for ASB prior to elective arthroplasty.

导言:指南和共识声明不支持在选择性关节置换术前对无症状菌尿(ASB)进行常规术前检测。尽管如此,尿液检测在骨科实践中仍很普遍。该混合方法逐步质量改进项目旨在制定并实施一项指南,以减少单个中心在择期关节置换术前进行不必要的无症状菌尿术前检测。方法:第1步:描述单个中心关节置换术前尿液检测的现行做法;第2步:研究术前尿液培养与导致人工关节感染(PJI)的病原体之间的关联;第3步:共同设计一份指南,以减少择期关节置换术前不必要的无症状菌尿术前检测;第4步:实施一份可持续的指南,以减少择期关节置换术前不必要的无症状菌尿术前检测。结果:回顾性病历审查显示,择期关节置换术前的中段尿(MSU)检测(49%的患者术前送检MSU)以及尿路感染(UTI)和无症状菌尿的抗菌药物处方不一致。在确诊的 PJI 病例中,未观察到从尿液和关节抽吸物中分离出的微生物之间存在关联。在实施策略的支持下,共同设计的指南和决策支持工具得到了快速吸收和遵守。6 个月后证明了其可持续性。结论:在这项循序渐进的研究中,实施科学方法被用于挑战过时的临床实践,从而持续减少了择期关节成形术前不必要的 ASB 术前尿检。
{"title":"Using implementation science to develop and implement a guideline to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to elective arthroplasty.","authors":"Judith S L Partridge, Madeleine Daly, Carolyn Hemsley, Zameer Shah, Krishanthi Sathanandan, Cathryn Mainwaring, Jugdeep K Dhesi","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-57-2020","DOIUrl":"10.5194/jbji-6-57-2020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Guidelines and consensus statements do not support routine preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) prior to elective arthroplasty. Despite this, urine testing remains commonplace in orthopaedic practice. This mixed methods stepwise quality improvement project aimed to develop and implement a guideline to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to elective arthroplasty within a single centre. <b>Methods</b>: Step 1 - description of current practice in preoperative urine testing prior to arthroplasty within a single centre; Step 2 - examination of the association between preoperative urine culture and pathogens causing prosthetic joint infection (PJI); Step 3 - co-design of a guideline to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to elective arthroplasty; Step 4 - implementation of a sustainable guideline to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing for asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to elective arthroplasty. <b>Results</b>: Retrospective chart review showed inconsistency in mid-stream urine (MSU) testing prior to elective arthroplasty (49 % preoperative MSU sent) and in antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection (UTI) and ASB. No association was observed between organisms isolated from urine and joint aspirate in confirmed cases of PJI. Co-design of a guideline and decision support tool supported through an implementation strategy resulted in rapid uptake and adherence. Sustainability was demonstrated at 6 months. <b>Conclusion</b>: In this stepwise study, implementation science methodology was used to challenge outdated clinical practice, achieving a sustained reduction in unnecessary preoperative urine testing for ASB prior to elective arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 3","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852403/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25341791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Septic arthritis of the knee due to Pantoea agglomerans: look for the thorn. 脓毒性膝关节炎因pantoa凝聚:寻找刺。
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2020-12-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-51-2020
Tobias Koester, Taro Kusano, Henk Eijer, Robert Escher, Gabriel Waldegg

We report on a patient with septic arthritis of the knee with Pantoea agglomerans after a penetrating black locust thorn injury. Antibiotics alone or in combination with an arthroscopy may be insufficient for achieving source control. Accurate medical history and open debridement with a search for a thorn fragment are key to successful treatment.

我们报告一个病人与化脓性关节炎的膝关节与Pantoea凝聚后穿透刺槐刺伤。单独使用抗生素或联合关节镜检查可能不足以控制感染源。准确的病史和开放清创与寻找刺碎片是成功治疗的关键。
{"title":"Septic arthritis of the knee due to <i>Pantoea</i> <i>agglomerans</i>: look for the thorn.","authors":"Tobias Koester,&nbsp;Taro Kusano,&nbsp;Henk Eijer,&nbsp;Robert Escher,&nbsp;Gabriel Waldegg","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-51-2020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-51-2020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report on a patient with septic arthritis of the knee with <i>Pantoea agglomerans</i> after a penetrating black locust thorn injury. Antibiotics alone or in combination with an arthroscopy may be insufficient for achieving source control. Accurate medical history and open debridement with a search for a thorn fragment are key to successful treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 3","pages":"51-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852405/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25341790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
A case of Trueperella pyogenes causing prosthetic joint infection. 化脓性真链球菌致假体关节感染1例。
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2020-12-01 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-47-2020
Tariq Azamgarhi, Simon Warren

We present the first reported case of prosthetic joint infection caused by Trueperella pyogenes. This animal pathogen rarely causes human infection. Our patient was successfully treated with single-stage exchange and 12 weeks of rifampicin and moxifloxacin.

我们报告了第一例由化脓性真佩菌引起的假体关节感染。这种动物病原体很少引起人类感染。我们的患者通过单期交换和12周的利福平和莫西沙星治疗成功。
{"title":"A case of <i>Trueperella pyogenes</i> causing prosthetic joint infection.","authors":"Tariq Azamgarhi,&nbsp;Simon Warren","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-47-2020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-47-2020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present the first reported case of prosthetic joint infection caused by <i>Trueperella pyogenes</i>. This animal pathogen rarely causes human infection. Our patient was successfully treated with single-stage exchange and 12 weeks of rifampicin and moxifloxacin.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 3","pages":"47-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852402/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25341789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Chronic prosthetic joint infections with a draining sinus. Who should receive suppressive antibiotic treatment? 慢性假体关节感染伴鼻窦引流。谁应该接受抑制性抗生素治疗?
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2020-10-30 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-43-2020
Karel-Jan Lensen, Rosa Escudero-Sanchez, Javier Cobo, Alex Soriano, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker

The benefit of suppressive antibiotic treatment in inoperable patients with a chronic periprosthetic joint infection and a sinus tract is unknown. Some physicians prefer to just let the sinus drain, while others prefer antibiotic treatment. In this viewpoint article we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of suppressive antibiotic treatment in this particular patient group.

对于慢性假体周围关节感染和窦道不能手术的患者,抑制抗生素治疗的益处尚不清楚。一些医生更喜欢让鼻窦引流,而另一些医生更喜欢抗生素治疗。在这篇观点文章中,我们讨论了抑制抗生素治疗在这一特殊患者群体中的优点和缺点。
{"title":"Chronic prosthetic joint infections with a draining sinus. Who should receive suppressive antibiotic treatment?","authors":"Karel-Jan Lensen,&nbsp;Rosa Escudero-Sanchez,&nbsp;Javier Cobo,&nbsp;Alex Soriano,&nbsp;Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-43-2020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-43-2020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefit of suppressive antibiotic treatment in inoperable patients with a chronic periprosthetic joint infection and a sinus tract is unknown. Some physicians prefer to just let the sinus drain, while others prefer antibiotic treatment. In this viewpoint article we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of suppressive antibiotic treatment in this particular patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 2","pages":"43-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648273/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38600042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
A sticky situation: a case of Actinomyces viscosus vertebral osteomyelitis. 粘性情况:一例粘性放线菌脊椎骨髓炎。
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2020-09-09 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-39-2020
Stephanie L Grach, Aaron J Tande

Actinomyces viscosus is an oral bacterium that is rarely virulent in humans, with most case presentations involving dental and maxillofacial infections. We describe the first reported case of A. viscosus vertebral osteomyelitis in a patient who had a significant response to penicillin after minimal response to cephalosporin therapy.

粘放线菌是一种口腔细菌,在人类中很少有毒性,大多数病例涉及口腔颌面部感染。我们描述了第一例报告的粘性A.脊椎骨髓炎患者,该患者在对头孢菌素治疗反应最小后对青霉素有显著反应。
{"title":"A sticky situation: a case of <i>Actinomyces viscosus</i> vertebral osteomyelitis.","authors":"Stephanie L Grach,&nbsp;Aaron J Tande","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-39-2020","DOIUrl":"10.5194/jbji-6-39-2020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Actinomyces viscosus</i> is an oral bacterium that is rarely virulent in humans, with most case presentations involving dental and maxillofacial infections. We describe the first reported case of <i>A. viscosus</i> vertebral osteomyelitis in a patient who had a significant response to penicillin after minimal response to cephalosporin therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 2","pages":"39-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38527069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Treatment of Neisseria meningitidis prosthetic joint infections with short-course antibiotics: three cases and a literature review. 短期抗生素治疗脑膜炎奈瑟菌假体关节感染3例并文献复习。
Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Pub Date : 2020-09-04 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-6-33-2020
Sarah Browning, Harry N Walker, Thomas Ryan, Robert Pickles, Michael Loftus, Jason A Trubiano, Andrew Hardidge, Joshua S Davis

Neisseria meningitidis is a rare cause of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), with only three cases previously reported. Here we report three further cases, all of which were successfully treated with implant retention and short-course antibiotics ( < 6  weeks).

脑膜炎奈瑟菌是一种罕见的引起假体关节感染(PJI)的原因,以前仅报道过3例。在这里,我们报告了另外三个病例,所有这些病例都成功地接受了种植体保留和短期抗生素治疗(6周)。
{"title":"Treatment of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> prosthetic joint infections with short-course antibiotics: three cases and a literature review.","authors":"Sarah Browning,&nbsp;Harry N Walker,&nbsp;Thomas Ryan,&nbsp;Robert Pickles,&nbsp;Michael Loftus,&nbsp;Jason A Trubiano,&nbsp;Andrew Hardidge,&nbsp;Joshua S Davis","doi":"10.5194/jbji-6-33-2020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-33-2020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> is a rare cause of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), with only three cases previously reported. Here we report three further cases, all of which were successfully treated with implant retention and short-course antibiotics ( <math><mrow><mo><</mo> <mn>6</mn></mrow> </math>  weeks).</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"6 2","pages":"33-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38527068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1