首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume最新文献

英文 中文
Intraoperative Tranexamic Acid Infusion Reduces Perioperative Blood Loss in Pediatric Limb-Salvage Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00261
Ahmed Mohamed El Ghoneimy, Tamer Ahmed Mahmoud Kotb, Ismail Rashad, Dina Elgalaly, Kareem AlFarsi, Mohamed Ahmed Khalil

Background: Limb-salvage surgery for malignant bone tumors can be associated with considerable perioperative blood loss. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of the intraoperative infusion of tranexamic acid (TXA) in children and adolescents undergoing limb-salvage surgery.

Methods: All participants were <18 years of age at the time of surgery and diagnosed with a malignant bone tumor of the femur that was treated with resection and reconstruction with a megaprosthesis. Exclusion criteria included anatomic locations other than the femur, reconstruction with a vascularized fibular graft, and a previous history of deep venous thrombosis, coagulopathy, or renal dysfunction. Participants were randomly allocated to either the TXA group (a preoperative loading dose infusion of 10 mg/kg of TXA followed by a continuous infusion of 5 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery) or the placebo group (the same dosage but with TXA substituted with an infusion of normal saline solution). Intraoperative and perioperative blood loss were calculated with use of the hemoglobin balance method. Perioperative blood loss at postoperative day 1 and at discharge from the hospital were calculated. The total volumes of blood transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. A statistical comparison between the groups was performed for blood loss and blood transfusion as well as for possible independent variables other than TXA, including age, body mass index, histopathologic diagnosis, tumor volume, preoperative hemoglobin level, type of resection, and the duration of surgery.

Results: A total of 48 participants, with a mean age of 12.5 ± 3.44 years (range, 5 to 18 years) and a male-to-female ratio of 1.18, were included. All participants were Egyptians by race and ethnicity. There were no minor or major drug-related adverse events. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.0616) or transfusion requirements (p = 0.812), but there was a significant difference in perioperative blood loss at postoperative day 1 (p = 0.0144) and at discharge from the hospital (p = 0.0106) and in perioperative blood transfusion (p = 0.023).

Conclusions: TXA can be safely infused intraoperatively in children and adolescents undergoing limb-salvage surgery, and it contributes significantly to the reduction of perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

{"title":"Intraoperative Tranexamic Acid Infusion Reduces Perioperative Blood Loss in Pediatric Limb-Salvage Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ahmed Mohamed El Ghoneimy, Tamer Ahmed Mahmoud Kotb, Ismail Rashad, Dina Elgalaly, Kareem AlFarsi, Mohamed Ahmed Khalil","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limb-salvage surgery for malignant bone tumors can be associated with considerable perioperative blood loss. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of the intraoperative infusion of tranexamic acid (TXA) in children and adolescents undergoing limb-salvage surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants were <18 years of age at the time of surgery and diagnosed with a malignant bone tumor of the femur that was treated with resection and reconstruction with a megaprosthesis. Exclusion criteria included anatomic locations other than the femur, reconstruction with a vascularized fibular graft, and a previous history of deep venous thrombosis, coagulopathy, or renal dysfunction. Participants were randomly allocated to either the TXA group (a preoperative loading dose infusion of 10 mg/kg of TXA followed by a continuous infusion of 5 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery) or the placebo group (the same dosage but with TXA substituted with an infusion of normal saline solution). Intraoperative and perioperative blood loss were calculated with use of the hemoglobin balance method. Perioperative blood loss at postoperative day 1 and at discharge from the hospital were calculated. The total volumes of blood transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. A statistical comparison between the groups was performed for blood loss and blood transfusion as well as for possible independent variables other than TXA, including age, body mass index, histopathologic diagnosis, tumor volume, preoperative hemoglobin level, type of resection, and the duration of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 participants, with a mean age of 12.5 ± 3.44 years (range, 5 to 18 years) and a male-to-female ratio of 1.18, were included. All participants were Egyptians by race and ethnicity. There were no minor or major drug-related adverse events. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.0616) or transfusion requirements (p = 0.812), but there was a significant difference in perioperative blood loss at postoperative day 1 (p = 0.0144) and at discharge from the hospital (p = 0.0106) and in perioperative blood transfusion (p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TXA can be safely infused intraoperatively in children and adolescents undergoing limb-salvage surgery, and it contributes significantly to the reduction of perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143023545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multidimensional Approach for Predicting 30-Day Mortality in Patients with a Hip Fracture: Development and External Validation of the Rotterdam Hip Fracture Mortality Prediction-30 Days (RHMP-30). 预测髋部骨折患者30天死亡率的多维方法:鹿特丹髋部骨折30天死亡率预测(rmp -30)的开发和外部验证。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01397
Louis de Jong, Eveline de Haan, Veronique A J I M van Rijckevorsel, T Martijn Kuijper, Gert R Roukema

Background: The aim of this study was to develop an accurate and clinically relevant prediction model for 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery.

Methods: A previous study protocol was utilized as a guideline for data collection and as the standard for the hip fracture treatment. Two prospective, detailed hip fracture databases of 2 different hospitals (hospital A, training cohort; hospital B, testing cohort) were utilized to obtain data. On the basis of the literature, the results of a univariable analysis, and expert opinion, 26 candidate predictors of 30-day mortality were selected. Subsequently, the training of the model, including variable selection, was performed on the training cohort (hospital A) with use of adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. External validation was performed on the testing cohort (hospital B).

Results: A total of 3,523 patients were analyzed, of whom 302 (8.6%) died within 30 days after surgery. After the LASSO analysis, 7 of the 26 variables were included in the prediction model: age, gender, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4, dementia, albumin level, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living total score, and residence in a nursing home. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model was 0.789 in the training cohort and 0.775 in the testing cohort. The calibration curve showed good consistency between observed and predicted 30-day mortality.

Conclusions: The Rotterdam Hip Fracture Mortality Prediction-30 Days (RHMP-30) was developed and externally validated, and showed adequate performance in predicting 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery. The RHMP-30 will be helpful for shared decision-making with patients regarding hip fracture treatment.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:本研究的目的是建立一个准确和临床相关的髋部骨折术后30天死亡率预测模型。方法:采用先前的研究方案作为数据收集的指南和髋部骨折治疗的标准。来自2家不同医院的两个前瞻性、详细的髋部骨折数据库(A医院,培训队列;B医院,测试队列)获得数据。在文献、单变量分析结果和专家意见的基础上,选择了26个候选的30天死亡率预测因子。随后,使用自适应最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)逻辑回归对培训队列(A医院)进行模型训练,包括变量选择。结果:共分析3,523例患者,其中302例(8.6%)在手术后30天内死亡。LASSO分析后,将26个变量中的7个纳入预测模型:年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师学会评分4分、痴呆、白蛋白水平、日常生活活动独立性Katz指数总分、养老院居住情况。训练组受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.789,测试组受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.775。校正曲线显示观察到的30天死亡率与预测的30天死亡率具有良好的一致性。结论:鹿特丹髋部骨折死亡率预测-30天(rmp -30)已开发并经过外部验证,在预测髋部骨折手术后30天死亡率方面表现良好。RHMP-30将有助于与髋部骨折患者共同决策治疗。证据等级:预后II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Multidimensional Approach for Predicting 30-Day Mortality in Patients with a Hip Fracture: Development and External Validation of the Rotterdam Hip Fracture Mortality Prediction-30 Days (RHMP-30).","authors":"Louis de Jong, Eveline de Haan, Veronique A J I M van Rijckevorsel, T Martijn Kuijper, Gert R Roukema","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop an accurate and clinically relevant prediction model for 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous study protocol was utilized as a guideline for data collection and as the standard for the hip fracture treatment. Two prospective, detailed hip fracture databases of 2 different hospitals (hospital A, training cohort; hospital B, testing cohort) were utilized to obtain data. On the basis of the literature, the results of a univariable analysis, and expert opinion, 26 candidate predictors of 30-day mortality were selected. Subsequently, the training of the model, including variable selection, was performed on the training cohort (hospital A) with use of adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. External validation was performed on the testing cohort (hospital B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,523 patients were analyzed, of whom 302 (8.6%) died within 30 days after surgery. After the LASSO analysis, 7 of the 26 variables were included in the prediction model: age, gender, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4, dementia, albumin level, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living total score, and residence in a nursing home. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model was 0.789 in the training cohort and 0.775 in the testing cohort. The calibration curve showed good consistency between observed and predicted 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Rotterdam Hip Fracture Mortality Prediction-30 Days (RHMP-30) was developed and externally validated, and showed adequate performance in predicting 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery. The RHMP-30 will be helpful for shared decision-making with patients regarding hip fracture treatment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Policy to Practice: Challenges in Implementing PROMs Reporting Under the New CMS Mandate. 从政策到实践:在新的CMS授权下实施PROMs报告的挑战。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00593
Nickelas Huffman, Shujaa T Khan, Ignacio Pasqualini, Nicolas S Piuzzi

Abstract: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently introduced mandatory reporting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following primary, elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures. This article explores the implications and implementation challenges of this policy shift in the field of orthopaedic surgery. With a review of the existing literature, we analyze the potential benefits and limitations of PROs, discuss the role of CMS in health-care quality improvement initiatives, explain the predicted difficulties in the successful implementation of this new mandate, and provide recommendations for the successful integration of the reporting of PROs in clinical practice.

摘要:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)最近引入了强制性报告患者报告的结果(PROs)后,主要,选择性全关节置换术(TJA)手术。本文探讨了这一政策转变在骨科外科领域的影响和实施挑战。通过对现有文献的回顾,我们分析了PROs的潜在好处和局限性,讨论了CMS在医疗质量改进计划中的作用,解释了成功实施这一新任务的预期困难,并为临床实践中成功整合PROs报告提供了建议。
{"title":"From Policy to Practice: Challenges in Implementing PROMs Reporting Under the New CMS Mandate.","authors":"Nickelas Huffman, Shujaa T Khan, Ignacio Pasqualini, Nicolas S Piuzzi","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00593","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently introduced mandatory reporting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following primary, elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures. This article explores the implications and implementation challenges of this policy shift in the field of orthopaedic surgery. With a review of the existing literature, we analyze the potential benefits and limitations of PROs, discuss the role of CMS in health-care quality improvement initiatives, explain the predicted difficulties in the successful implementation of this new mandate, and provide recommendations for the successful integration of the reporting of PROs in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aspirin Is as Effective and Safe as Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. 阿司匹林与口服抗凝剂在关节置换术后预防静脉血栓栓塞一样有效和安全:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00946
Zhenghua Hong, Yongwei Su, Liwei Zhang, Hua Luo

Background: Joint arthroplasty effectively treats osteoarthritis, providing pain relief and improving function, but postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a common complication. This study therefore assessed the effectiveness and safety of aspirin compared with oral anticoagulants (OACs) for VTE prophylaxis after joint arthroplasty.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to May 14, 2024, that compared the effect of aspirin versus OACs on VTE prophylaxis in adults undergoing joint arthroplasty. Data extraction followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers conducted the literature searches and data extraction. A random-effects model was used to estimate effects. The primary outcome was the incidence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE); secondary outcomes included bleeding, wound complications, and mortality.

Results: The meta-analysis included 11 RCTs with a total of 4,717 participants (55.1% female) from several continents. The relative risk (RR) of VTE following joint arthroplasty was 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.32) for aspirin compared with OACs. Similar results were observed for DVT (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.40) and PE (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.71). There were no significant differences in the risks of bleeding, wound complications, or mortality between patients receiving aspirin and those receiving OACs. Subgroup analyses considering factors such as study region, type of joint surgery, type of VTE detection, year of publication, use of mechanical VTE prophylaxis, aspirin dose, type of OAC comparator, study quality, and funding also found no significant differences in VTE incidence between aspirin and OACs. The overall quality of evidence for VTE and DVT outcomes was high.

Conclusions: Based on high-quality evidence from RCTs, aspirin is as effective and safe as OACs in preventing VTE, including DVT and PE, after joint arthroplasty, without increasing complications.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:关节置换术能有效治疗骨关节炎,缓解疼痛并改善功能,但术后静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)仍然是常见的并发症。因此,本研究评估了阿司匹林与口服抗凝剂(OACs)在关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞预防中的有效性和安全性。方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,对截至2024年5月14日的随机对照试验(rct)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较阿司匹林和OACs对成人关节置换术中静脉血栓栓塞预防的影响。数据提取遵循PRISMA指南。两位独立研究人员进行了文献检索和数据提取。采用随机效应模型估计效果。主要终点是静脉血栓形成(VTE)的发生率,包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE);次要结局包括出血、伤口并发症和死亡率。结果:荟萃分析包括11项随机对照试验,共有4,717名参与者(55.1%为女性)来自几个大洲。与OACs相比,阿司匹林关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞的相对危险度(RR)为1.11(95%可信区间[CI], 0.93 ~ 1.32)。深静脉血栓形成的结果相似(RR, 1.12;95% CI, 0.90 ~ 1.40)和PE (RR, 1.18;95% CI, 0.51 ~ 2.71)。服用阿司匹林的患者和服用OACs的患者在出血、伤口并发症或死亡率方面没有显著差异。考虑研究区域、关节手术类型、静脉血栓栓塞检测类型、发表年份、机械静脉血栓栓塞预防的使用、阿司匹林剂量、OAC比较剂类型、研究质量和资金等因素的亚组分析也发现阿司匹林和OAC之间的静脉血栓栓塞发生率无显著差异。VTE和DVT结果的总体证据质量很高。结论:基于随机对照试验的高质量证据,阿司匹林在预防关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞(包括DVT和PE)方面与OACs一样有效和安全,且不会增加并发症。证据水平:治疗性i级。参见《作者说明》获得证据水平的完整描述。
{"title":"Aspirin Is as Effective and Safe as Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Zhenghua Hong, Yongwei Su, Liwei Zhang, Hua Luo","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00946","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Joint arthroplasty effectively treats osteoarthritis, providing pain relief and improving function, but postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a common complication. This study therefore assessed the effectiveness and safety of aspirin compared with oral anticoagulants (OACs) for VTE prophylaxis after joint arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to May 14, 2024, that compared the effect of aspirin versus OACs on VTE prophylaxis in adults undergoing joint arthroplasty. Data extraction followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers conducted the literature searches and data extraction. A random-effects model was used to estimate effects. The primary outcome was the incidence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE); secondary outcomes included bleeding, wound complications, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 11 RCTs with a total of 4,717 participants (55.1% female) from several continents. The relative risk (RR) of VTE following joint arthroplasty was 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.32) for aspirin compared with OACs. Similar results were observed for DVT (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.40) and PE (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.71). There were no significant differences in the risks of bleeding, wound complications, or mortality between patients receiving aspirin and those receiving OACs. Subgroup analyses considering factors such as study region, type of joint surgery, type of VTE detection, year of publication, use of mechanical VTE prophylaxis, aspirin dose, type of OAC comparator, study quality, and funding also found no significant differences in VTE incidence between aspirin and OACs. The overall quality of evidence for VTE and DVT outcomes was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on high-quality evidence from RCTs, aspirin is as effective and safe as OACs in preventing VTE, including DVT and PE, after joint arthroplasty, without increasing complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determining Maximal Outcome Improvement Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Mid-Term Follow-up Study Using the Anchor Method. 确定初级前交叉韧带重建术后患者报告结果指标的最大结果改善阈值:使用锚定法的中期随访研究。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01330
Zhi-Yu Zhang, Wei-Li Shi, Wen-Bin Bai, Le-Jin Hong, Wen-Li Dai, Xiao-Yu Pan, Xiao-Yue Fu, Jian-Quan Wang, Cheng Wang

Background: The clinical interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) can be challenging. This study aimed to establish the clinical relevance of PROMs by determining maximal outcome improvement (MOI) thresholds at mid-term follow-up after primary ACLR.

Methods: A total of 343 patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft at our institute were included. Patients were queried with a 2-option anchor question regarding satisfaction with their current knee symptom state. The MOI of a PROM was calculated for each patient as the percentage of improvement normalized by the maximal possible improvement. The MOI threshold for each PROM was determined as the optimal cutoff value for predicting patient satisfaction based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of achieving these thresholds. Subgroup analyses that stratified the time from injury to surgery within the cohort were performed, and MOI thresholds were recalculated within each of these subgroups. The PROMs evaluated in this study were the modified Lysholm Knee Score and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC) score.

Results: The calculated MOI threshold was 35.1% for the Lysholm score and 46.7% for the IKDC score. A longer time from injury to surgery reduced the odds of achieving the MOI threshold for the Lysholm score (odds ratio [OR] per time bracket = 0.7114, p < 0.0001) and IKDC score (OR = 0.8038, p = 0.0003). Male sex was associated with higher odds of achieving the MOI threshold for the IKDC score (OR = 1.9645, p = 0.0143). For patients with chronicity of ≤6 months, the MOI threshold was 35.1% for the Lysholm score and 57.9% for the IKDC score, and for patients with chronicity of >6 months, the thresholds were 24.5% and 27.1%, respectively.

Conclusions: The calculated MOI thresholds for the Lysholm and IKDC scores at mid-term follow-up after primary ACLR were 35.1% and 46.7%, respectively. Greater chronicity of the ACL injury was associated with lower odds of achieving the MOI thresholds for the PROMs at mid-term follow-up.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术(ACLR)后患者报告结果指标(PROMs)的临床解释具有挑战性。本研究旨在通过确定前交叉韧带重建术后中期随访的最大疗效改善(MOI)阈值来确定PROMs的临床相关性:方法:共纳入了 343 名在我院接受了使用腘绳肌腱自体移植的初级单束前交叉韧带置换术的患者。患者被问及对当前膝关节症状状态满意度的两选一锚定问题。每个患者的 PROM 的 MOI 计算为改善百分比与最大可能改善程度的归一化。根据接收者操作特征曲线分析,确定每个 PROM 的 MOI 临界值为预测患者满意度的最佳临界值。为确定达到这些阈值的预测因素,进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。对队列中从受伤到手术的时间进行了分组分析,并在每个分组中重新计算了MOI阈值。本研究评估的PROM是改良的Lysholm膝关节评分和国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评估表(IKDC)评分:计算得出的MOI阈值为:Lysholm评分35.1%,IKDC评分46.7%。从受伤到手术的时间越长,达到Lysholm评分MOI阈值的几率就越低(每个时间段的几率比[OR]=0.7114,P < 0.0001),达到IKDC评分MOI阈值的几率比[OR]=0.8038,P = 0.0003)。男性与达到 IKDC 评分的 MOI 临界值的几率更高相关(OR = 1.9645,p = 0.0143)。对于慢性期≤6个月的患者,Lysholm评分的MOI阈值为35.1%,IKDC评分的MOI阈值为57.9%;对于慢性期大于6个月的患者,MOI阈值分别为24.5%和27.1%:结论:在前交叉韧带初次置换术后的中期随访中,计算得出的Lysholm和IKDC评分的MOI阈值分别为35.1%和46.7%。前交叉韧带损伤的慢性化程度越高,中期随访时PROMs达到MOI阈值的几率越低:证据等级:治疗四级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
{"title":"Determining Maximal Outcome Improvement Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Mid-Term Follow-up Study Using the Anchor Method.","authors":"Zhi-Yu Zhang, Wei-Li Shi, Wen-Bin Bai, Le-Jin Hong, Wen-Li Dai, Xiao-Yu Pan, Xiao-Yue Fu, Jian-Quan Wang, Cheng Wang","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01330","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) can be challenging. This study aimed to establish the clinical relevance of PROMs by determining maximal outcome improvement (MOI) thresholds at mid-term follow-up after primary ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 343 patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft at our institute were included. Patients were queried with a 2-option anchor question regarding satisfaction with their current knee symptom state. The MOI of a PROM was calculated for each patient as the percentage of improvement normalized by the maximal possible improvement. The MOI threshold for each PROM was determined as the optimal cutoff value for predicting patient satisfaction based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of achieving these thresholds. Subgroup analyses that stratified the time from injury to surgery within the cohort were performed, and MOI thresholds were recalculated within each of these subgroups. The PROMs evaluated in this study were the modified Lysholm Knee Score and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated MOI threshold was 35.1% for the Lysholm score and 46.7% for the IKDC score. A longer time from injury to surgery reduced the odds of achieving the MOI threshold for the Lysholm score (odds ratio [OR] per time bracket = 0.7114, p < 0.0001) and IKDC score (OR = 0.8038, p = 0.0003). Male sex was associated with higher odds of achieving the MOI threshold for the IKDC score (OR = 1.9645, p = 0.0143). For patients with chronicity of ≤6 months, the MOI threshold was 35.1% for the Lysholm score and 57.9% for the IKDC score, and for patients with chronicity of >6 months, the thresholds were 24.5% and 27.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The calculated MOI thresholds for the Lysholm and IKDC scores at mid-term follow-up after primary ACLR were 35.1% and 46.7%, respectively. Greater chronicity of the ACL injury was associated with lower odds of achieving the MOI thresholds for the PROMs at mid-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Cement Distribution on the Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Fractures: Assessment with an MRI-Based Reference Marker. 骨水泥分布对经皮椎体增强治疗骨质疏松性骨折疗效的影响:基于mri参考标记的评估。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01289
Ruigang Jia, Dong Li, Peng He, Xin-Qiang Wang, Yunpeng Zhang, Jianling Bai, Jiwei Tian

Background: No studies have evaluated the impact of the cement distribution as classified on the basis of the fracture bone marrow edema area (FBMEA) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the efficacy of percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) for acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Methods: The clinical data of patients with acute, painful, single-level thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures were retrospectively analyzed. The bone cement distribution on the postoperative radiograph was divided into 4 types according to the distribution of the FBMEA on the preoperative MRI. The primary outcomes were the postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Cement leakage, adjacent vertebral fractures (an important concern in complications after vertebroplasty and a subset of new fractures), and recollapse of the treated vertebra were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 128 patients, 80.5% of whom were female, were included and had follow-up for 24 months. The mean patient age (and standard deviation) was 74.2 ± 8.6 years. The cement distribution was classified as Type I in 18 patients, Type II in 26, Type III in 46, and Type IV in 38. At the primary time point (6 months), there was a significant difference in the ODI score favoring the Type-III and Type-IV groups compared with the Type-I and Type-II groups (adjusted 95% confidence interval [CI]: Type I versus Type II, -2.40 to 4.50; Type I versus Type III, 1.35 to 7.63; Type I versus Type IV, 1.27 to 7.92; Type II versus Type III, 0.67 to 6.21; Type II versus Type IV, 0.63 to 6.46; adjusted p < 0.0083), whereas no significant differences were found between the 4 groups in the VAS pain score. The Type-II and Type-IV groups had a higher incidence of cement leakage, and the Type-III and Type-IV groups had a lower incidence of vertebral recollapse.

Conclusions: An adequate distribution of bone cement is advantageous for functional improvement, short-term pain relief, and a lower rate of vertebral recollapse. The FBMEA appears to be a feasible reference marker for evaluating the performance of the PVA procedure.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:目前还没有研究评估根据磁共振成像(MRI)中骨折骨髓水肿面积(FBMEA)分类的骨水泥分布对经皮椎体增强术(PVA)治疗急性骨质疏松性椎体骨折疗效的影响。方法:回顾性分析急性疼痛性单节段胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折患者的临床资料。根据术前MRI上FBMEA的分布,将术后x线片上骨水泥分布分为4种类型。主要结果为术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分。我们还评估了骨水泥渗漏、相邻椎体骨折(椎体成形术后并发症和一部分新骨折的一个重要问题)以及治疗后椎体的再塌陷。结果:共纳入128例患者,其中80.5%为女性,随访24个月。患者平均年龄(及标准差)为74.2±8.6岁。18例患者的骨水泥分布为I型,26例为II型,46例为III型,38例为IV型。在主要时间点(6个月),与I型和II型组相比,iii型和iv型组的ODI评分有显著差异(调整95%置信区间[CI]: I型与II型,-2.40至4.50;I型vs III型,1.35 vs 7.63;I型vs IV型,1.27 vs 7.92;II型vs III型,0.67 ~ 6.21;II型vs . IV型,0.63 ~ 6.46;经校正p < 0.0083),而4组间VAS疼痛评分无显著差异。ii型和iv型组骨水泥渗漏发生率较高,iii型和iv型组椎体再塌陷发生率较低。结论:骨水泥的适当分布有利于功能改善、短期疼痛缓解和降低椎体再溃率。FBMEA似乎是评估PVA程序性能的可行参考指标。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Impact of Cement Distribution on the Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Fractures: Assessment with an MRI-Based Reference Marker.","authors":"Ruigang Jia, Dong Li, Peng He, Xin-Qiang Wang, Yunpeng Zhang, Jianling Bai, Jiwei Tian","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01289","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No studies have evaluated the impact of the cement distribution as classified on the basis of the fracture bone marrow edema area (FBMEA) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the efficacy of percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) for acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of patients with acute, painful, single-level thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures were retrospectively analyzed. The bone cement distribution on the postoperative radiograph was divided into 4 types according to the distribution of the FBMEA on the preoperative MRI. The primary outcomes were the postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Cement leakage, adjacent vertebral fractures (an important concern in complications after vertebroplasty and a subset of new fractures), and recollapse of the treated vertebra were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 128 patients, 80.5% of whom were female, were included and had follow-up for 24 months. The mean patient age (and standard deviation) was 74.2 ± 8.6 years. The cement distribution was classified as Type I in 18 patients, Type II in 26, Type III in 46, and Type IV in 38. At the primary time point (6 months), there was a significant difference in the ODI score favoring the Type-III and Type-IV groups compared with the Type-I and Type-II groups (adjusted 95% confidence interval [CI]: Type I versus Type II, -2.40 to 4.50; Type I versus Type III, 1.35 to 7.63; Type I versus Type IV, 1.27 to 7.92; Type II versus Type III, 0.67 to 6.21; Type II versus Type IV, 0.63 to 6.46; adjusted p < 0.0083), whereas no significant differences were found between the 4 groups in the VAS pain score. The Type-II and Type-IV groups had a higher incidence of cement leakage, and the Type-III and Type-IV groups had a lower incidence of vertebral recollapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An adequate distribution of bone cement is advantageous for functional improvement, short-term pain relief, and a lower rate of vertebral recollapse. The FBMEA appears to be a feasible reference marker for evaluating the performance of the PVA procedure.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 2","pages":"196-207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Volume and Distribution of Early Knee Effusion After TKA with a PEEK-Based Knee Prosthesis: Correlation with Changes in Serum Inflammation Marker Levels, Knee Functional Score, and Range of Motion. 全膝关节置换术后早期膝关节积液的体积和分布:与血清炎症标志物水平、膝关节功能评分和活动范围变化的相关性
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00309
Zhuocheng Lyu, Ke Yang, Zhiguo Yuan, Teng Long, Xinhua Qu, Bing Yue, Xiaolin Liu, You Wang

Background: Early knee effusion is a common phenomenon after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with potential clinical implications. Unlike traditional alloy knee prostheses, the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) knee system has radiographic transparency on magnetic resonance (MR) scans, which allows analysis of prosthetic knee effusion. We aimed to identify the distribution and volume of knee effusion after TKA with the PEEK prosthesis with use of MR imaging and to analyze whether dynamic changes in effusion were correlated with serum inflammatory marker changes and knee function recovery.

Methods: Nine patients with osteoarthritis who were 59 to 74 years old underwent unilateral TKA with the PEEK prosthesis between June 2021 and August 2021. Dynamic early postoperative changes in the volume and distribution of knee effusion were evaluated with use of 3D MR stereoscopic images. Serum inflammatory markers were measured via blood tests, and joint function was evaluated with use of the subjective functional score of the Knee Society Score (KSS) and knee range of motion (ROM). Linear regression analyses were performed to assess for correlations between knee effusion volume and inflammatory markers and between knee effusion volume and joint function.

Results: The mean serum inflammatory marker levels increased significantly at 1 week after TKA with the PEEK prosthesis and then gradually decreased with time from 1 to 6 months. The mean total knee effusion volume gradually decreased over time. Concurrently, the mean KSS subjective functional score and mean knee ROM improved with time. Total knee effusion volume was positively correlated with C-reactive protein level (R2 = 0.16; p = 0.007) and negatively correlated with the change in KSS score between the preoperative and postoperative time points (R2 = 0.19; p = 0.003). Using the 1-week total knee effusion volume as a reference, a positive correlation was observed between the reduction in total knee effusion volume and the actual value of the ROM (R2 = 0.36; p = 0.0001) from 3 to 24 months postoperatively.

Conclusions: Through 3D MR imaging, the precise distribution and volume of, and dynamic changes in, knee effusion after TKA with the PEEK prosthesis were confirmed and were found to be correlated with inflammation and joint function in the early postoperative period. The results demonstrate the potential clinical benefit of the PEEK-based knee system for future use.

Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:早期膝关节积液是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的常见现象,具有潜在的临床意义。与传统的合金膝关节假体不同,聚醚醚酮(PEEK)膝关节系统在磁共振(MR)扫描中具有放射成像透明度,可以分析假体膝关节积液。我们的目的是通过MR成像确定PEEK假体TKA后膝关节积液的分布和体积,并分析积液的动态变化是否与血清炎症标志物变化和膝关节功能恢复相关。方法:在2021年6月至2021年8月期间,9例59至74岁的骨关节炎患者采用PEEK假体进行单侧TKA。利用三维磁共振立体图像评估术后早期膝关节积液体积和分布的动态变化。通过血液检查测量血清炎症标志物,并使用膝关节社会评分(KSS)和膝关节活动范围(ROM)的主观功能评分来评估关节功能。采用线性回归分析来评估膝关节积液量与炎症标志物之间以及膝关节积液量与关节功能之间的相关性。结果:PEEK假体TKA术后1周血清炎症标志物水平显著升高,1 ~ 6个月逐渐降低。平均膝关节总积液量随时间逐渐减少。同时,平均KSS主观功能评分和平均膝关节ROM随时间改善。膝关节总积液量与c反应蛋白水平呈正相关(R2 = 0.16;p = 0.007),且与术前、术后时间点KSS评分变化呈负相关(R2 = 0.19;P = 0.003)。以1周膝关节总积液量为参照,观察到膝关节总积液量的减少与ROM的实际值呈正相关(R2 = 0.36;P = 0.0001)。结论:通过3D MR成像,证实了PEEK假体TKA术后膝关节积液的精确分布、体积及动态变化,并发现其与术后早期炎症及关节功能相关。结果表明基于peek的膝关节系统在未来的使用中具有潜在的临床益处。证据等级:诊断级III。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Volume and Distribution of Early Knee Effusion After TKA with a PEEK-Based Knee Prosthesis: Correlation with Changes in Serum Inflammation Marker Levels, Knee Functional Score, and Range of Motion.","authors":"Zhuocheng Lyu, Ke Yang, Zhiguo Yuan, Teng Long, Xinhua Qu, Bing Yue, Xiaolin Liu, You Wang","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00309","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early knee effusion is a common phenomenon after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with potential clinical implications. Unlike traditional alloy knee prostheses, the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) knee system has radiographic transparency on magnetic resonance (MR) scans, which allows analysis of prosthetic knee effusion. We aimed to identify the distribution and volume of knee effusion after TKA with the PEEK prosthesis with use of MR imaging and to analyze whether dynamic changes in effusion were correlated with serum inflammatory marker changes and knee function recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine patients with osteoarthritis who were 59 to 74 years old underwent unilateral TKA with the PEEK prosthesis between June 2021 and August 2021. Dynamic early postoperative changes in the volume and distribution of knee effusion were evaluated with use of 3D MR stereoscopic images. Serum inflammatory markers were measured via blood tests, and joint function was evaluated with use of the subjective functional score of the Knee Society Score (KSS) and knee range of motion (ROM). Linear regression analyses were performed to assess for correlations between knee effusion volume and inflammatory markers and between knee effusion volume and joint function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean serum inflammatory marker levels increased significantly at 1 week after TKA with the PEEK prosthesis and then gradually decreased with time from 1 to 6 months. The mean total knee effusion volume gradually decreased over time. Concurrently, the mean KSS subjective functional score and mean knee ROM improved with time. Total knee effusion volume was positively correlated with C-reactive protein level (R2 = 0.16; p = 0.007) and negatively correlated with the change in KSS score between the preoperative and postoperative time points (R2 = 0.19; p = 0.003). Using the 1-week total knee effusion volume as a reference, a positive correlation was observed between the reduction in total knee effusion volume and the actual value of the ROM (R2 = 0.36; p = 0.0001) from 3 to 24 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through 3D MR imaging, the precise distribution and volume of, and dynamic changes in, knee effusion after TKA with the PEEK prosthesis were confirmed and were found to be correlated with inflammation and joint function in the early postoperative period. The results demonstrate the potential clinical benefit of the PEEK-based knee system for future use.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 2","pages":"134-143"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717431/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Compelling Evidence Regarding Long-Term Performance of Highly Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene in TKA at 10 Years: Commentary on an article by Harold I. Salmons, MD, et al.: "Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Versus Conventional Polyethylene in 518 Primary TKAs at 10 Years". 关于高交联聚乙烯与传统聚乙烯在TKA中10年长期表现的令人信服的证据:对Harold I. Salmons, MD等人的一篇文章的评论:“高交联聚乙烯与传统聚乙烯在518例原发性TKA中10年的多中心随机临床试验”。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.01004
Jeremy M Gililland
{"title":"Compelling Evidence Regarding Long-Term Performance of Highly Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene in TKA at 10 Years: Commentary on an article by Harold I. Salmons, MD, et al.: \"Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Versus Conventional Polyethylene in 518 Primary TKAs at 10 Years\".","authors":"Jeremy M Gililland","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 2","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty Using Instrumentation of Every Level Versus Alternate Levels: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. 每节段内固定与交替节段内固定的开放式颈椎椎板成形术:一项多中心随机对照试验。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00245
Koji Tamai, Hidetomi Terai, Masaki Terakawa, Shinji Takahashi, Akinobu Suzuki, Hiroaki Nakamura

Background: In the setting of cervical open-door laminoplasty, the question of whether or not every opened laminar level should be instrumented has not been sufficiently investigated. We postulated that the surgical outcomes of open-door laminoplasty with instrumentation of every second opened level (skip-fixation) might not be inferior to those of laminoplasty with instrumentation of every opened level (all-fixation). The purpose of the present study was to test the noninferiority of laminoplasty with skip-fixation in improving myelopathy at 2 years postoperatively compared with all-fixation. Additionally, we compared radiographic and surgical outcomes between the 2 types of procedures.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, unblinded randomized controlled trial included patients ≥60 years of age who underwent C3 to C6 open-door cervical laminoplasty for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients were allocated to the skip-fixation group (n = 80) or the all-fixation group (n = 75) using a permuted block method. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included surgical data, complications, 2-year change in the JOA score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck pain, and radiographic outcomes.

Results: One hundred and thirty patients (including 66 in the skip-fixation group and 64 in the all-fixation group) completed the trial at 2 years (follow-up rate, 83.9%). The difference in the JOA score at 2 years was 0.0298 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.706 to 0.766), which was within the noninferiority margin (p < 0.0001; noninferiority test). In the secondary analyses, laminoplasty with skip-fixation demonstrated a significantly shorter surgical time (p = 0.010; Mann-Whitney U test) and greater improvement in the VAS score for neck pain, NDI, and EQ-5D-5L score (p = 0.006, p = 0.047, p = 0.037, respectively; mixed-effect model) compared with all-fixation. There were no significant between-group differences in radiographic outcomes, including the hinge union rate.

Conclusions: Skip-fixation may be sufficient to achieve noninferior 2-year postoperative improvement in myelopathy. Additionally, laminoplasty with skip-fixation potentially can lead to improvements in terms of neck pain, neck disability, and quality of life compared with all-fixation.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:在颈椎开门椎板成形术中,是否每个打开的椎板水平都应该测量的问题尚未得到充分的研究。我们推测,每隔一节段内固定的开门椎板成形术(跳过固定)的手术效果可能不逊于每节段内固定的椎板成形术(全固定)。本研究的目的是检验椎板成形术与跳过固定术在术后2年改善脊髓病方面与全固定术相比的非劣势性。此外,我们比较了两种手术的影像学和外科结果。方法:这项前瞻性、多中心、非盲随机对照试验纳入了≥60岁接受C3至C6开门颈椎椎板成形术治疗退行性颈椎病的患者。采用排列阻滞法将患者分为不固定组(n = 80)和全固定组(n = 75)。主要结果是术后2年日本骨科协会(JOA)评分的组间差异。次要结局包括手术资料、并发症、JOA评分的2年变化、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5维5级仪器)评分、颈部疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分和影像学结果。结果:130例患者(跳过固定组66例,全固定组64例)在2年内完成试验(随访率为83.9%)。2年时JOA评分的差异为0.0298(95%可信区间[CI], -0.706 ~ 0.766),在非劣效性范围内(p < 0.0001;非测试)。在二次分析中,椎板成形术与跳跃固定显示手术时间明显缩短(p = 0.010;Mann-Whitney U检验),颈痛VAS评分、NDI评分和EQ-5D-5L评分均有较大改善(p = 0.006, p = 0.047, p = 0.037;混合效应模型)与全固定相比较。两组间放射学结果无显著差异,包括铰链愈合率。结论:跳跃固定可能足以实现脊髓病术后2年的改善。此外,与全固定相比,跳过固定的椎板成形术可能会改善颈部疼痛、颈部残疾和生活质量。证据等级:治疗性II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty Using Instrumentation of Every Level Versus Alternate Levels: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Koji Tamai, Hidetomi Terai, Masaki Terakawa, Shinji Takahashi, Akinobu Suzuki, Hiroaki Nakamura","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00245","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the setting of cervical open-door laminoplasty, the question of whether or not every opened laminar level should be instrumented has not been sufficiently investigated. We postulated that the surgical outcomes of open-door laminoplasty with instrumentation of every second opened level (skip-fixation) might not be inferior to those of laminoplasty with instrumentation of every opened level (all-fixation). The purpose of the present study was to test the noninferiority of laminoplasty with skip-fixation in improving myelopathy at 2 years postoperatively compared with all-fixation. Additionally, we compared radiographic and surgical outcomes between the 2 types of procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, unblinded randomized controlled trial included patients ≥60 years of age who underwent C3 to C6 open-door cervical laminoplasty for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients were allocated to the skip-fixation group (n = 80) or the all-fixation group (n = 75) using a permuted block method. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included surgical data, complications, 2-year change in the JOA score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck pain, and radiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty patients (including 66 in the skip-fixation group and 64 in the all-fixation group) completed the trial at 2 years (follow-up rate, 83.9%). The difference in the JOA score at 2 years was 0.0298 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.706 to 0.766), which was within the noninferiority margin (p < 0.0001; noninferiority test). In the secondary analyses, laminoplasty with skip-fixation demonstrated a significantly shorter surgical time (p = 0.010; Mann-Whitney U test) and greater improvement in the VAS score for neck pain, NDI, and EQ-5D-5L score (p = 0.006, p = 0.047, p = 0.037, respectively; mixed-effect model) compared with all-fixation. There were no significant between-group differences in radiographic outcomes, including the hinge union rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Skip-fixation may be sufficient to achieve noninferior 2-year postoperative improvement in myelopathy. Additionally, laminoplasty with skip-fixation potentially can lead to improvements in terms of neck pain, neck disability, and quality of life compared with all-fixation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 2","pages":"144-151"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complete Blood Cell Count-Based Ratios Identify Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Likely to Benefit from Perioperative Dexamethasone. 全血细胞计数为基础的比率确定全关节置换术患者可能受益于围手术期地塞米松。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00184
Julian Wier, Ian A Jones, Ryan Palmer, Cory K Mayfield, Nicholas J Kassebaum, Jay R Lieberman, Nathanael D Heckmann

Background: Complete blood cell count-based ratios (CBRs), including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), are inflammatory markers associated with postoperative morbidity. Given the link between the surgical stress response and complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), this study aimed to evaluate whether higher preoperative CBR values predict greater postoperative benefits associated with dexamethasone utilization.

Methods: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for adult patients who underwent primary, elective total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). Multivariable logistic regression models using dexamethasone exposure and CBRs as independent variables assessed primary end points of 90-day postoperative complications and length of stay (LOS) of ≥3 days. The probability difference between the dexamethasone and non-dexamethasone groups for each primary end point was determined across all values of each CBR. Probability differences were compared across CBR quartiles.

Results: A total of 32,849 primary, elective TJAs (12,788 THAs [38.93%], 20,061 TKAs [61.07%]) performed between 2016 and 2021 were identified, and 22,282 (67.83%) of the patients received perioperative dexamethasone. Among patients with an NLR value of >1.00, those receiving dexamethasone had a lower probability of postoperative complications (all p < 0.05). Dexamethasone was associated with lower odds of an LOS of ≥3 days among patients in the highest NLR quartile (≥4.67) compared with the lowest quartile (NLR <1.84) (p = 0.002). Among patients with an MLR value of ≥0.36, those receiving dexamethasone had significantly lower odds of postoperative complications. Dexamethasone was associated with lower odds of an LOS of ≥3 days among patients with an MLR of ≥0.33 (the 2 highest quartiles) compared with an MLR of <0.24 (the lowest quartile) (p = 0.039).

Conclusions: Higher NLR and MLR values were associated with greater marginal benefit from perioperative dexamethasone treatment, establishing a modifiable link between adverse outcomes and perioperative inflammation in TJA.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:全血细胞计数比(CBRs),包括中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比(NLR)和单核细胞-淋巴细胞比(MLR),是与术后发病率相关的炎症标志物。考虑到手术应激反应与全关节置换术(TJA)后并发症之间的联系,本研究旨在评估术前CBR值较高是否预示着地塞米松应用带来更大的术后获益。方法:查询Premier Healthcare数据库中接受过原发性、选择性全髋关节或膝关节置换术(THA或TKA)的成年患者。以地塞米松暴露和cbr为自变量的多变量logistic回归模型评估了术后90天并发症和≥3天住院时间(LOS)的主要终点。每个主要终点的地塞米松组和非地塞米松组之间的概率差异是通过每个CBR的所有值来确定的。在CBR四分位数之间比较概率差异。结果:2016年至2021年共进行了32,849例原发性选择性tja(12,788例tha[38.93%], 20,061例tka[61.07%]),其中22282例(67.83%)患者接受了围手术期地塞米松治疗。NLR值为bbb1.00的患者中,接受地塞米松治疗的患者术后并发症发生率较低(p < 0.05)。与最低四分位数(NLR)相比,最高NLR四分位数(≥4.67)的患者中地塞米松发生≥3天LOS的几率更低。结论:更高的NLR和MLR值与地塞米松围手术期治疗的更大边际效益相关,建立了TJA不良结局与围手术期炎症之间的可修改联系。证据等级:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Complete Blood Cell Count-Based Ratios Identify Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Likely to Benefit from Perioperative Dexamethasone.","authors":"Julian Wier, Ian A Jones, Ryan Palmer, Cory K Mayfield, Nicholas J Kassebaum, Jay R Lieberman, Nathanael D Heckmann","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00184","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00184","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complete blood cell count-based ratios (CBRs), including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), are inflammatory markers associated with postoperative morbidity. Given the link between the surgical stress response and complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), this study aimed to evaluate whether higher preoperative CBR values predict greater postoperative benefits associated with dexamethasone utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for adult patients who underwent primary, elective total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). Multivariable logistic regression models using dexamethasone exposure and CBRs as independent variables assessed primary end points of 90-day postoperative complications and length of stay (LOS) of ≥3 days. The probability difference between the dexamethasone and non-dexamethasone groups for each primary end point was determined across all values of each CBR. Probability differences were compared across CBR quartiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32,849 primary, elective TJAs (12,788 THAs [38.93%], 20,061 TKAs [61.07%]) performed between 2016 and 2021 were identified, and 22,282 (67.83%) of the patients received perioperative dexamethasone. Among patients with an NLR value of >1.00, those receiving dexamethasone had a lower probability of postoperative complications (all p < 0.05). Dexamethasone was associated with lower odds of an LOS of ≥3 days among patients in the highest NLR quartile (≥4.67) compared with the lowest quartile (NLR <1.84) (p = 0.002). Among patients with an MLR value of ≥0.36, those receiving dexamethasone had significantly lower odds of postoperative complications. Dexamethasone was associated with lower odds of an LOS of ≥3 days among patients with an MLR of ≥0.33 (the 2 highest quartiles) compared with an MLR of <0.24 (the lowest quartile) (p = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher NLR and MLR values were associated with greater marginal benefit from perioperative dexamethasone treatment, establishing a modifiable link between adverse outcomes and perioperative inflammation in TJA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 2","pages":"163-173"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1