Pub Date : 2024-12-04Epub Date: 2024-10-03DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01323
Andrew H Kim, Kevin C Mo, Andrew B Harris, Renaud Lafage, Brian J Neuman, Richard A Hostin, Alexandra Soroceanu, Han Jo Kim, Eric O Klineberg, Jeffrey L Gum, Munish C Gupta, D Kojo Hamilton, Frank Schwab, Doug Burton, Alan Daniels, Peter G Passias, Robert A Hart, Breton G Line, Christopher Ames, Virginie Lafage, Christopher I Shaffrey, Justin S Smith, Shay Bess, Lawrence Lenke, Khaled M Kebaish
Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly utilized to reduce blood loss in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite its widespread use, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to assess differences in blood loss and complications between high, medium, and low-dose TXA regimens among patients undergoing surgery for complex ASD.
Methods: A multicenter database was retrospectively analyzed to identify 265 patients with complex ASD. Patients were separated into 3 groups by TXA regimen: (1) low dose (<20-mg/kg loading dose with ≤2-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), (2) medium dose (20 to 50-mg/kg loading dose with 2 to 5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), and (3) high dose (>50-mg/kg loading dose with ≥5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose). The measured outcomes included blood loss, complications, and red blood cell (RBC) units transfused intraoperatively and perioperatively. The multivariable analysis controlled for TXA dosing regimen, levels fused, operating room time, preoperative hemoglobin, 3-column osteotomy, and posterior interbody fusion.
Results: The cohort was predominantly White (91.3%) and female (69.1%) and had a mean age of 61.6 years. Of the 265 patients, 54 (20.4%) received low-dose, 131 (49.4%) received medium-dose, and 80 (30.2%) received high-dose TXA. The median blood loss was 1,200 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 750 to 2,000). The median RBC units transfused intraoperatively was 1.0 (IQR, 0.0 to 2.0), and the median RBC units transfused perioperatively was 2.0 (IQR, 1.0 to 4.0). Compared with the high-dose group, the low-dose group had increased blood loss (by 513.0 mL; p = 0.022) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.6 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.3 units; p = 0.024). The medium-dose group had increased blood loss (by 491.8 mL; p = 0.006) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.7 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.5 units; p < 0.001) compared with the high-dose group.
Conclusions: Patients with ASD who received high-dose intraoperative TXA had fewer RBC transfusions intraoperatively, fewer RBC transfusions perioperatively, and less blood loss than those who received low or medium-dose TXA, with no differences in the rates of seizure or thromboembolic complications.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
{"title":"High-Dose TXA Is Associated with Less Blood Loss Than Low-Dose TXA without Increased Complications in Patients with Complex Adult Spinal Deformity.","authors":"Andrew H Kim, Kevin C Mo, Andrew B Harris, Renaud Lafage, Brian J Neuman, Richard A Hostin, Alexandra Soroceanu, Han Jo Kim, Eric O Klineberg, Jeffrey L Gum, Munish C Gupta, D Kojo Hamilton, Frank Schwab, Doug Burton, Alan Daniels, Peter G Passias, Robert A Hart, Breton G Line, Christopher Ames, Virginie Lafage, Christopher I Shaffrey, Justin S Smith, Shay Bess, Lawrence Lenke, Khaled M Kebaish","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01323","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly utilized to reduce blood loss in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite its widespread use, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to assess differences in blood loss and complications between high, medium, and low-dose TXA regimens among patients undergoing surgery for complex ASD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter database was retrospectively analyzed to identify 265 patients with complex ASD. Patients were separated into 3 groups by TXA regimen: (1) low dose (<20-mg/kg loading dose with ≤2-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), (2) medium dose (20 to 50-mg/kg loading dose with 2 to 5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), and (3) high dose (>50-mg/kg loading dose with ≥5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose). The measured outcomes included blood loss, complications, and red blood cell (RBC) units transfused intraoperatively and perioperatively. The multivariable analysis controlled for TXA dosing regimen, levels fused, operating room time, preoperative hemoglobin, 3-column osteotomy, and posterior interbody fusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort was predominantly White (91.3%) and female (69.1%) and had a mean age of 61.6 years. Of the 265 patients, 54 (20.4%) received low-dose, 131 (49.4%) received medium-dose, and 80 (30.2%) received high-dose TXA. The median blood loss was 1,200 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 750 to 2,000). The median RBC units transfused intraoperatively was 1.0 (IQR, 0.0 to 2.0), and the median RBC units transfused perioperatively was 2.0 (IQR, 1.0 to 4.0). Compared with the high-dose group, the low-dose group had increased blood loss (by 513.0 mL; p = 0.022) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.6 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.3 units; p = 0.024). The medium-dose group had increased blood loss (by 491.8 mL; p = 0.006) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.7 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.5 units; p < 0.001) compared with the high-dose group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with ASD who received high-dose intraoperative TXA had fewer RBC transfusions intraoperatively, fewer RBC transfusions perioperatively, and less blood loss than those who received low or medium-dose TXA, with no differences in the rates of seizure or thromboembolic complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"2205-2214"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study compared outcomes at 18 months between patients who underwent transtibial amputation with and without a tibiofibular synostosis procedure. We hypothesized that complication rates would be lower in patients who did not receive a synostosis procedure compared with those who did receive a synostosis procedure, but the synostosis group would report better function.
Methods: This multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) included patients aged 18 to 60 years who were treated without (n = 52) or with synostosis (n = 54) during transtibial amputation. Patients who refused randomization were enrolled in an observational (OBS) study (n = 93; 31 synostosis, 62 non-synostosis). There were 2 primary outcomes: operative treatment for a complication within 18 months of amputation and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores. The primary analyses were based on the RCT participants, and the secondary analyses were based on the treatment received by the combined RCT + OBS participants.
Results: In the primary RCT analysis, the probability of ≥1 operatively treated complication was higher for the synostosis group (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.8% to 56.2%) than the non-synostosis group (24%; 95% CI: 14.2% to 37.9%), with an absolute risk difference of 18% (95% CI: 0.31% to 36%). There were no appreciable differences in mean SMFA scores. In the secondary combined analysis, the probability of an operatively treatment complication was larger in patients who did versus did not receive a synostosis procedure (absolute risk difference: 26.1%; 95% CI: 12.0% to 40.3%). Differences in SMFA scores favored synostosis, although there were no differences in pain, prosthetic use, and satisfaction.
Conclusions: The results of the primary RCT analysis supported our hypothesis of fewer complications in patients who do not undergo a synostosis procedure compared with those who undergo a synostosis procedure, but we found insufficient evidence to conclude that those in the synostosis group have better function. The trial did not reach target enrollment. The secondary combined analysis supported the primary analysis in terms of complications. In the secondary analysis, while pain, prosthetic use, and satisfaction remained similar, the SMFA scores were better for the patients who received a synostosis procedure, although the differences are of uncertain clinical importance.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
{"title":"Outcomes Following Transtibial Amputation with and without a Tibiofibular Synostosis Procedure: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (TAOS Study).","authors":"","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared outcomes at 18 months between patients who underwent transtibial amputation with and without a tibiofibular synostosis procedure. We hypothesized that complication rates would be lower in patients who did not receive a synostosis procedure compared with those who did receive a synostosis procedure, but the synostosis group would report better function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) included patients aged 18 to 60 years who were treated without (n = 52) or with synostosis (n = 54) during transtibial amputation. Patients who refused randomization were enrolled in an observational (OBS) study (n = 93; 31 synostosis, 62 non-synostosis). There were 2 primary outcomes: operative treatment for a complication within 18 months of amputation and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores. The primary analyses were based on the RCT participants, and the secondary analyses were based on the treatment received by the combined RCT + OBS participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary RCT analysis, the probability of ≥1 operatively treated complication was higher for the synostosis group (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.8% to 56.2%) than the non-synostosis group (24%; 95% CI: 14.2% to 37.9%), with an absolute risk difference of 18% (95% CI: 0.31% to 36%). There were no appreciable differences in mean SMFA scores. In the secondary combined analysis, the probability of an operatively treatment complication was larger in patients who did versus did not receive a synostosis procedure (absolute risk difference: 26.1%; 95% CI: 12.0% to 40.3%). Differences in SMFA scores favored synostosis, although there were no differences in pain, prosthetic use, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the primary RCT analysis supported our hypothesis of fewer complications in patients who do not undergo a synostosis procedure compared with those who undergo a synostosis procedure, but we found insufficient evidence to conclude that those in the synostosis group have better function. The trial did not reach target enrollment. The secondary combined analysis supported the primary analysis in terms of complications. In the secondary analysis, while pain, prosthetic use, and satisfaction remained similar, the SMFA scores were better for the patients who received a synostosis procedure, although the differences are of uncertain clinical importance.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vincent P Federico, Alexander J Acuna, Luis M Salazar, Rajko Vucicevic, Austin Q Nguyen, Logan Reed, William E Harkin, Joseph Serino, Alexander J Butler, Matthew W Colman, Frank M Phillips
{"title":"Trends in Medicare Payments for Facility Fees and Surgeon Professional Fees for Spine Surgeries.","authors":"Vincent P Federico, Alexander J Acuna, Luis M Salazar, Rajko Vucicevic, Austin Q Nguyen, Logan Reed, William E Harkin, Joseph Serino, Alexander J Butler, Matthew W Colman, Frank M Phillips","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00228","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142739493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lucas S McDonald, Kelly K Hynes, Joshua A Parry, Byron F Stephens, Joseph H Schwab
Abstract: In 1992, the American Orthopaedic Association-Japanese Orthopaedic Association (AOA-JOA) Traveling Fellowship was created to develop and enhance collaboration between the Japanese and American orthopaedic communities. The fellowship is geared to early-career surgeons and fosters clinical and cultural exchange between members of the 2 countries. In 2024, the fellows hailed from around the United States: Kelly K. Hynes, Lucas S. McDonald, Joshua A. Parry, Joseph H. Schwab, and Byron F. Stephens all participated in the program. During the 3-week fellowship, the fellows visited 8 academic centers across Japan and attended the JOA Annual Meeting in Fukuoka. This experience was incredibly rewarding, both clinically and professionally, and all the fellows returned home with novel ideas for their clinical practices.
摘要:1992 年,美国矫形外科协会-日本矫形外科协会(AOA-JOA)设立了旅行奖学金,以发展和加强日本和美国矫形外科界之间的合作。该奖学金面向职业生涯初期的外科医生,促进两国成员之间的临床和文化交流。2024 年的研究员来自美国各地:Kelly K. Hynes、Lucas S. McDonald、Joshua A. Parry、Joseph H. Schwab 和 Byron F. Stephens 都参加了该项目。在为期三周的研究期间,研究员们访问了日本各地的8个学术中心,并参加了在福冈举行的JOA年会。无论是在临床上还是在专业上,这次经历都让学员们受益匪浅,所有学员都带着对临床实践的新想法回国。
{"title":"The 2024 American Orthopaedic Association-Japanese Orthopaedic Association Traveling Fellowship.","authors":"Lucas S McDonald, Kelly K Hynes, Joshua A Parry, Byron F Stephens, Joseph H Schwab","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01011","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In 1992, the American Orthopaedic Association-Japanese Orthopaedic Association (AOA-JOA) Traveling Fellowship was created to develop and enhance collaboration between the Japanese and American orthopaedic communities. The fellowship is geared to early-career surgeons and fosters clinical and cultural exchange between members of the 2 countries. In 2024, the fellows hailed from around the United States: Kelly K. Hynes, Lucas S. McDonald, Joshua A. Parry, Joseph H. Schwab, and Byron F. Stephens all participated in the program. During the 3-week fellowship, the fellows visited 8 academic centers across Japan and attended the JOA Annual Meeting in Fukuoka. This experience was incredibly rewarding, both clinically and professionally, and all the fellows returned home with novel ideas for their clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142739549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Monish S Lavu, Christian J Hecht, David C Kaelber, George Grammatopoulos, Yasuhiro Homma, Atul F Kamath
Background: Risk factors for gluteal tears include age-related deterioration, female sex, and increased body mass index. As the literature that supports the sagittal relationship between the lumbar spine and the hip is increasing, there may be a parallel relationship between the perturbations in spinopelvic alignment caused by lumbar spine disease and gluteal muscle tears. Because no prior studies other than single-institution series have reported on this phenomenon, we investigated spine-abductor syndrome at the population level.
Methods: This study utilized TriNetX, a federated research network that continuously aggregates deidentified electronic health record data from >92 million patients across the United States. The relative risks of gluteal tear encounter diagnoses and procedures were calculated for patients with and without the following characteristics: age ≥45 years, female sex, obesity, lumbar spine diagnoses, lumbar spine injections, and lumbar spine surgery. Utilizing the Cox proportional hazard model, we also analyzed gluteal tear-free survival over a period of ≥10 years in subgroups of patients who had been diagnosed with lumbar pathology, had been administered a lumbar injection, or had received lumbar surgery.
Results: Of the 8,475,800 patients who had received lumbar spine diagnoses, undergone lumbar injections, and/or undergone lumbar surgeries, 458,311 patients (5.4%) had gluteal tears, representing a relative risk of 13.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]:13.6 to 13.6). After controlling for age, sex, and obesity, survival analysis showed markedly increased hazard ratios (HRs) for patients having a gluteal tear encounter diagnosis in the intervening 13 years (2010 to 2023) if they had had a previous lumbar spine pathology encounter diagnosis (HR: 4.8, 95% CI: 4.5 to 5.1), had undergone lumbar spine injections (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 6.2 to 9.5), or had undergone lumbar spine surgery (HR: 6.6, 95% CI: 5.3 to 8.1) in 2010.
Conclusions: These findings suggest a strong association between lumbar spine pathology and abductor tears. Further biomechanical and neuroanatomic studies may elucidate the effects of lumbar spine disease in relation to gluteal tears. Additionally, there may be a need to optimize diagnostic protocols for lateral hip pain in patients with a history of lumbar spine disease.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
{"title":"Spine-Abductor Syndrome: Novel Associations Between Lumbar Spine Disease and Hip Gluteal Muscle Pathology.","authors":"Monish S Lavu, Christian J Hecht, David C Kaelber, George Grammatopoulos, Yasuhiro Homma, Atul F Kamath","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors for gluteal tears include age-related deterioration, female sex, and increased body mass index. As the literature that supports the sagittal relationship between the lumbar spine and the hip is increasing, there may be a parallel relationship between the perturbations in spinopelvic alignment caused by lumbar spine disease and gluteal muscle tears. Because no prior studies other than single-institution series have reported on this phenomenon, we investigated spine-abductor syndrome at the population level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized TriNetX, a federated research network that continuously aggregates deidentified electronic health record data from >92 million patients across the United States. The relative risks of gluteal tear encounter diagnoses and procedures were calculated for patients with and without the following characteristics: age ≥45 years, female sex, obesity, lumbar spine diagnoses, lumbar spine injections, and lumbar spine surgery. Utilizing the Cox proportional hazard model, we also analyzed gluteal tear-free survival over a period of ≥10 years in subgroups of patients who had been diagnosed with lumbar pathology, had been administered a lumbar injection, or had received lumbar surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 8,475,800 patients who had received lumbar spine diagnoses, undergone lumbar injections, and/or undergone lumbar surgeries, 458,311 patients (5.4%) had gluteal tears, representing a relative risk of 13.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]:13.6 to 13.6). After controlling for age, sex, and obesity, survival analysis showed markedly increased hazard ratios (HRs) for patients having a gluteal tear encounter diagnosis in the intervening 13 years (2010 to 2023) if they had had a previous lumbar spine pathology encounter diagnosis (HR: 4.8, 95% CI: 4.5 to 5.1), had undergone lumbar spine injections (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 6.2 to 9.5), or had undergone lumbar spine surgery (HR: 6.6, 95% CI: 5.3 to 8.1) in 2010.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest a strong association between lumbar spine pathology and abductor tears. Further biomechanical and neuroanatomic studies may elucidate the effects of lumbar spine disease in relation to gluteal tears. Additionally, there may be a need to optimize diagnostic protocols for lateral hip pain in patients with a history of lumbar spine disease.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nathan J Lee, Lawrence G Lenke, Varun Arvind, Ted Shi, Alexandra C Dionne, Chidebelum Nnake, Mitchell Yeary, Michael Fields, Matt Simhon, Anastasia Ferraro, Matthew Cooney, Erik Lewerenz, Justin L Reyes, Steven G Roth, Chun Wai Hung, Justin K Scheer, Thomas Zervos, Earl D Thuet, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar, Ronald A Lehman, Benjamin D Roye, Michael G Vitale, Fthimnir M Hassan
Background: An accurate knowledge of a patient's risk of cord-level intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data loss is important for an informed decision-making process prior to deformity correction, but no prediction tool currently exists.
Methods: A total of 1,106 patients with spinal deformity and 205 perioperative variables were included. A stepwise machine-learning (ML) approach using random forest (RF) analysis and multivariable logistic regression was performed. Patients were randomly allocated to training (75% of patients) and testing (25% of patients) groups. Feature score weights were derived by rounding up the regression coefficients from the multivariable logistic regression model. Variables in the final scoring calculator were automatically selected through the ML process to optimize predictive performance.
Results: Eight features were included in the scoring system: sagittal deformity angular ratio (sDAR) of ≥15 (score = 2), type-3 spinal cord shape (score = 2), conus level below L2 (score = 2), cervical upper instrumented vertebra (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic Cobb angle of ≥75° (score = 2), preoperative lower-extremity motor deficit (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic kyphosis of ≥80° (score = 1), and total deformity angular ratio (tDAR) of ≥25 (score = 1). Higher cumulative scores were associated with increased rates of cord-level IONM data loss: patients with a cumulative score of ≤2 had a cord-level IONM data loss rate of 0.9%, whereas those with a score of ≥7 had a loss rate of 86%. When evaluated in the testing group, the scoring system achieved an accuracy of 93%, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 94%, and an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.898.
Conclusions: This is the first study to provide an ML-derived preoperative scoring system that predicts cord-level IONM data loss during pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery with >90% accuracy.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
{"title":"A Novel Preoperative Scoring System to Accurately Predict Cord-Level Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Data Loss During Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Machine-Learning Approach.","authors":"Nathan J Lee, Lawrence G Lenke, Varun Arvind, Ted Shi, Alexandra C Dionne, Chidebelum Nnake, Mitchell Yeary, Michael Fields, Matt Simhon, Anastasia Ferraro, Matthew Cooney, Erik Lewerenz, Justin L Reyes, Steven G Roth, Chun Wai Hung, Justin K Scheer, Thomas Zervos, Earl D Thuet, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar, Ronald A Lehman, Benjamin D Roye, Michael G Vitale, Fthimnir M Hassan","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate knowledge of a patient's risk of cord-level intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data loss is important for an informed decision-making process prior to deformity correction, but no prediction tool currently exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,106 patients with spinal deformity and 205 perioperative variables were included. A stepwise machine-learning (ML) approach using random forest (RF) analysis and multivariable logistic regression was performed. Patients were randomly allocated to training (75% of patients) and testing (25% of patients) groups. Feature score weights were derived by rounding up the regression coefficients from the multivariable logistic regression model. Variables in the final scoring calculator were automatically selected through the ML process to optimize predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight features were included in the scoring system: sagittal deformity angular ratio (sDAR) of ≥15 (score = 2), type-3 spinal cord shape (score = 2), conus level below L2 (score = 2), cervical upper instrumented vertebra (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic Cobb angle of ≥75° (score = 2), preoperative lower-extremity motor deficit (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic kyphosis of ≥80° (score = 1), and total deformity angular ratio (tDAR) of ≥25 (score = 1). Higher cumulative scores were associated with increased rates of cord-level IONM data loss: patients with a cumulative score of ≤2 had a cord-level IONM data loss rate of 0.9%, whereas those with a score of ≥7 had a loss rate of 86%. When evaluated in the testing group, the scoring system achieved an accuracy of 93%, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 94%, and an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.898.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to provide an ML-derived preoperative scoring system that predicts cord-level IONM data loss during pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery with >90% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caroline P Thirukumaran, Jordan J Cruse, Patricia D Franklin, Benjamin F Ricciardi, Linda I Suleiman, Said A Ibrahim
Abstract: Published in 2003 by the Institute of Medicine, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care placed an unprecedented spotlight on disparities in the U.S. health-care system. In the 2 decades since the publication of that landmark report, disparities continue to be prevalent and remain an important significant national concern. This article synthesizes the evolution, current state, and future of racial and ethnic disparities in the use of elective total joint replacement surgeries. We contextualize our impressions with respect to the recommendations of the Unequal Treatment Report.
摘要:美国医学研究所(Institute of Medicine) 2003年发表的《不平等待遇:直面医疗保健中的种族和民族差异》(equal Treatment: facing Racial and Ethnic disparity in Health Care)一文,将美国医疗保健体系中的不平等问题置于前所未有的聚光灯下。在那份具有里程碑意义的报告发表以来的20年里,差距仍然普遍存在,仍然是一个重要的国家关切问题。本文综合了选择性全关节置换手术中种族和民族差异的演变、现状和未来。我们把我们对《不平等待遇报告》各项建议的印象放在背景中考虑。
{"title":"Two Decades Since the Unequal Treatment Report: The State of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Elective Total Hip and Knee Replacement Use.","authors":"Caroline P Thirukumaran, Jordan J Cruse, Patricia D Franklin, Benjamin F Ricciardi, Linda I Suleiman, Said A Ibrahim","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Published in 2003 by the Institute of Medicine, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care placed an unprecedented spotlight on disparities in the U.S. health-care system. In the 2 decades since the publication of that landmark report, disparities continue to be prevalent and remain an important significant national concern. This article synthesizes the evolution, current state, and future of racial and ethnic disparities in the use of elective total joint replacement surgeries. We contextualize our impressions with respect to the recommendations of the Unequal Treatment Report.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Catherine J Fedorka, Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Matthew J Best, Harry H Liu, Xiaoran Zhang, Brett Sanders, Joseph A Abboud, Mohamad Y Fares, Jacob M Kirsch, Jason E Simon, Jarret Woodmass, Porter Jones, Derek A Haas, April D Armstrong, Uma Srikumaran, Eric R Wagner, Michael B Gottschalk, Adam Z Khan, John G Costouros, Jon J P Warner, Evan A O'Donnell
Background: Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a frequently performed outpatient orthopaedic surgery, with substantial financial implications for health-care systems. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a method for nuanced cost analysis and is a valuable tool for strategic health-care decision-making. The aim of this study was to apply the TDABC methodology to RCR procedures to identify specific avenues to optimize cost-efficiency within the health-care system in 2 critical areas: (1) the reduction of variability in the episode duration, and (2) the standardization of suture anchor acquisition costs.
Methods: Using a multicenter, retrospective design, this study incorporates data from all patients who underwent an RCR surgical procedure at 1 of 4 academic tertiary health systems across the United States. Data were extracted from Avant-Garde Health's Care Measurement platform and were analyzed utilizing TDABC methodology. Cost analysis was performed using 2 primary metrics: the opportunity costs arising from a possible reduction in episode duration variability, and the potential monetary savings achievable through the standardization of suture anchor costs.
Results: In this study, 921 RCR cases performed at 4 institutions had a mean episode duration cost of $4,094 ± $1,850. There was a significant threefold cost variability between the 10th percentile ($2,282) and the 90th percentile ($6,833) (p < 0.01). The mean episode duration was registered at 7.1 hours. The largest variability in the episode duration was time spent in the post-acute care unit and the ward after the surgical procedure. By reducing the episode duration variability, it was estimated that up to 640 care-hours could be saved annually at a single hospital. Likewise, standardizing suture anchor acquisition costs could generate direct savings totaling $217,440 across the hospitals.
Conclusions: This multicenter study offers valuable insights into RCR cost as a function of care pathways and suture anchor cost. It outlines avenues for achieving cost-savings and operational efficiency. These findings can serve as a foundational basis for developing health-economics models.
Level of evidence: Economic and Decision Analysis Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
{"title":"Defining the Cost of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Multicenter, Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing and Cost Optimization Investigation.","authors":"Catherine J Fedorka, Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Matthew J Best, Harry H Liu, Xiaoran Zhang, Brett Sanders, Joseph A Abboud, Mohamad Y Fares, Jacob M Kirsch, Jason E Simon, Jarret Woodmass, Porter Jones, Derek A Haas, April D Armstrong, Uma Srikumaran, Eric R Wagner, Michael B Gottschalk, Adam Z Khan, John G Costouros, Jon J P Warner, Evan A O'Donnell","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a frequently performed outpatient orthopaedic surgery, with substantial financial implications for health-care systems. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a method for nuanced cost analysis and is a valuable tool for strategic health-care decision-making. The aim of this study was to apply the TDABC methodology to RCR procedures to identify specific avenues to optimize cost-efficiency within the health-care system in 2 critical areas: (1) the reduction of variability in the episode duration, and (2) the standardization of suture anchor acquisition costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a multicenter, retrospective design, this study incorporates data from all patients who underwent an RCR surgical procedure at 1 of 4 academic tertiary health systems across the United States. Data were extracted from Avant-Garde Health's Care Measurement platform and were analyzed utilizing TDABC methodology. Cost analysis was performed using 2 primary metrics: the opportunity costs arising from a possible reduction in episode duration variability, and the potential monetary savings achievable through the standardization of suture anchor costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 921 RCR cases performed at 4 institutions had a mean episode duration cost of $4,094 ± $1,850. There was a significant threefold cost variability between the 10th percentile ($2,282) and the 90th percentile ($6,833) (p < 0.01). The mean episode duration was registered at 7.1 hours. The largest variability in the episode duration was time spent in the post-acute care unit and the ward after the surgical procedure. By reducing the episode duration variability, it was estimated that up to 640 care-hours could be saved annually at a single hospital. Likewise, standardizing suture anchor acquisition costs could generate direct savings totaling $217,440 across the hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter study offers valuable insights into RCR cost as a function of care pathways and suture anchor cost. It outlines avenues for achieving cost-savings and operational efficiency. These findings can serve as a foundational basis for developing health-economics models.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Economic and Decision Analysis Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sung Hyeon Noh, Sang-Woo Lee, Jong-Moon Hwang, JinWoo Jung, Eunyoung Lee, Dae-Chul Cho, Chi Heon Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim
Background: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) results in less tissue damage than in other surgeries, but immediate postoperative pain occurs. Notably, facet joint widening occurs in the vertebral body after OLIF. We hypothesized that the application of a facet joint block to the area of widening would relieve facet joint pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of such injections on postoperative pain.
Methods: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled study randomized patients into 2 groups. Patients assigned to the active group received an intra-articular injection of a compound mixture of bupivacaine and triamcinolone, whereas patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of normal saline solution injection. Back and dominant leg pain were evaluated with use of a visual analog scale (VAS) at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively with use of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and VAS for back and dominant leg pain.
Results: Of the 61 patients who were included, 31 were randomized to the placebo group and 30 were randomized to the active group. Postoperative fentanyl consumption from patient-controlled analgesia was higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 36 hours postoperatively (p < 0.001) and decreased gradually in both groups. VAS back pain scores were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 48 hours postoperatively. On average, patients in the active group had a higher satisfaction score (p = 0.038) and were discharged 1.3 days earlier than those in the placebo group.
Conclusions: The use of an intraoperative facet joint block decreased pain perception during OLIF, thereby reducing opioid consumption and the severity of postoperative pain. This effect was also associated with a reduction in the length of the stay.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
{"title":"Intraoperative Facet Joint Block Reduces Pain After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sung Hyeon Noh, Sang-Woo Lee, Jong-Moon Hwang, JinWoo Jung, Eunyoung Lee, Dae-Chul Cho, Chi Heon Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01480","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) results in less tissue damage than in other surgeries, but immediate postoperative pain occurs. Notably, facet joint widening occurs in the vertebral body after OLIF. We hypothesized that the application of a facet joint block to the area of widening would relieve facet joint pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of such injections on postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blinded, placebo-controlled study randomized patients into 2 groups. Patients assigned to the active group received an intra-articular injection of a compound mixture of bupivacaine and triamcinolone, whereas patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of normal saline solution injection. Back and dominant leg pain were evaluated with use of a visual analog scale (VAS) at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively with use of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and VAS for back and dominant leg pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 61 patients who were included, 31 were randomized to the placebo group and 30 were randomized to the active group. Postoperative fentanyl consumption from patient-controlled analgesia was higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 36 hours postoperatively (p < 0.001) and decreased gradually in both groups. VAS back pain scores were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 48 hours postoperatively. On average, patients in the active group had a higher satisfaction score (p = 0.038) and were discharged 1.3 days earlier than those in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an intraoperative facet joint block decreased pain perception during OLIF, thereby reducing opioid consumption and the severity of postoperative pain. This effect was also associated with a reduction in the length of the stay.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brendan M Striano, Alexander M Crawford, Jonathan Gong, Vineet Desai, Daniel C Gabriel, J Taylor Bellamy, Tino Mukorombindo, Lara L Cohen, Andrew K Simpson, Andrew J Schoenfeld
Background: Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are increasingly common. Although it is known that such fractures may elevate the risk of near-term morbidity, the natural history of patients who sustain such injuries remains poorly described. We sought to characterize the natural history of patients treated for thoracolumbar fractures and to understand clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with survival.
Methods: Patients treated for acute thoracic or lumbar spine fractures within a large academic health-care network between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and mortality data were obtained from medical records and administrative charts. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with survival, while adjusting for confounders. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: The study included 717 patients (median age, 66 years; 59.8% male; 69% non-Hispanic White). The mortality rate was 7.0% (n = 50), 16.2% (n = 116), and 20.4% (n = 146) at 3, 12, and 24 months following injury, respectively. In adjusted analysis, patients who died within the first year following injury were more likely to be older (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.05) and male (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.69). A higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index at presentation were also influential factors. The final model explained 81% (95% CI = 81% to 83%) of the variation in survival.
Conclusions: We identified a previously underappreciated fact: thoracolumbar fractures are associated with a mortality risk comparable with that of hip fractures. The risk of mortality is greatest in elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities. The results of our model can be used in patient and family counseling, informed decision-making, and resource allocation to mitigate the potential risk of near-term mortality in high-risk individuals.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
背景:胸腰椎骨折越来越常见。虽然已知此类骨折可能会增加近期发病的风险,但对此类损伤患者的自然病史仍知之甚少。我们试图描述胸腰椎骨折患者的自然病史,并了解与生存率相关的临床和社会人口学因素。方法:对2015年至2021年间在大型学术医疗网络中治疗急性胸椎或腰椎骨折的患者进行识别。临床、放射学和死亡率数据来自医疗记录和行政图表。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估生存率。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估与生存相关的因素,同时调整混杂因素。结果以比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)表示。结果:研究纳入717例患者(中位年龄66岁;男性59.8%;69%是非西班牙裔白人)。伤后3、12和24个月的死亡率分别为7.0% (n = 50)、16.2% (n = 116)和20.4% (n = 146)。在调整分析中,受伤后一年内死亡的患者更有可能年龄较大(OR = 1.03;95% CI = 1.01 ~ 1.05)和男性(OR = 1.67;95% CI = 1.05 ~ 2.69)。较高的损伤严重程度评分、较低的格拉斯哥昏迷评分和较高的就诊时Charlson合并症指数也是影响因素。最终模型解释了81% (95% CI = 81%至83%)的生存差异。结论:我们发现了一个以前未被重视的事实:胸腰椎骨折与髋部骨折的死亡风险相当。老年患者和有多种合并症的患者死亡风险最大。该模型的结果可用于患者和家属咨询、知情决策和资源分配,以减轻高风险个体近期死亡的潜在风险。证据等级:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Thoracolumbar Fracture: A Natural History Study of Survival Following Injury.","authors":"Brendan M Striano, Alexander M Crawford, Jonathan Gong, Vineet Desai, Daniel C Gabriel, J Taylor Bellamy, Tino Mukorombindo, Lara L Cohen, Andrew K Simpson, Andrew J Schoenfeld","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00706","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00706","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are increasingly common. Although it is known that such fractures may elevate the risk of near-term morbidity, the natural history of patients who sustain such injuries remains poorly described. We sought to characterize the natural history of patients treated for thoracolumbar fractures and to understand clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated for acute thoracic or lumbar spine fractures within a large academic health-care network between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and mortality data were obtained from medical records and administrative charts. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with survival, while adjusting for confounders. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 717 patients (median age, 66 years; 59.8% male; 69% non-Hispanic White). The mortality rate was 7.0% (n = 50), 16.2% (n = 116), and 20.4% (n = 146) at 3, 12, and 24 months following injury, respectively. In adjusted analysis, patients who died within the first year following injury were more likely to be older (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.05) and male (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.69). A higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index at presentation were also influential factors. The final model explained 81% (95% CI = 81% to 83%) of the variation in survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified a previously underappreciated fact: thoracolumbar fractures are associated with a mortality risk comparable with that of hip fractures. The risk of mortality is greatest in elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities. The results of our model can be used in patient and family counseling, informed decision-making, and resource allocation to mitigate the potential risk of near-term mortality in high-risk individuals.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}