首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume最新文献

英文 中文
High-Dose TXA Is Associated with Less Blood Loss Than Low-Dose TXA without Increased Complications in Patients with Complex Adult Spinal Deformity. 在复杂成人脊柱畸形患者中,大剂量 TXA 比小剂量 TXA 失血更少,且并发症不会增加。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-04 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01323
Andrew H Kim, Kevin C Mo, Andrew B Harris, Renaud Lafage, Brian J Neuman, Richard A Hostin, Alexandra Soroceanu, Han Jo Kim, Eric O Klineberg, Jeffrey L Gum, Munish C Gupta, D Kojo Hamilton, Frank Schwab, Doug Burton, Alan Daniels, Peter G Passias, Robert A Hart, Breton G Line, Christopher Ames, Virginie Lafage, Christopher I Shaffrey, Justin S Smith, Shay Bess, Lawrence Lenke, Khaled M Kebaish

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly utilized to reduce blood loss in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite its widespread use, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to assess differences in blood loss and complications between high, medium, and low-dose TXA regimens among patients undergoing surgery for complex ASD.

Methods: A multicenter database was retrospectively analyzed to identify 265 patients with complex ASD. Patients were separated into 3 groups by TXA regimen: (1) low dose (<20-mg/kg loading dose with ≤2-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), (2) medium dose (20 to 50-mg/kg loading dose with 2 to 5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), and (3) high dose (>50-mg/kg loading dose with ≥5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose). The measured outcomes included blood loss, complications, and red blood cell (RBC) units transfused intraoperatively and perioperatively. The multivariable analysis controlled for TXA dosing regimen, levels fused, operating room time, preoperative hemoglobin, 3-column osteotomy, and posterior interbody fusion.

Results: The cohort was predominantly White (91.3%) and female (69.1%) and had a mean age of 61.6 years. Of the 265 patients, 54 (20.4%) received low-dose, 131 (49.4%) received medium-dose, and 80 (30.2%) received high-dose TXA. The median blood loss was 1,200 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 750 to 2,000). The median RBC units transfused intraoperatively was 1.0 (IQR, 0.0 to 2.0), and the median RBC units transfused perioperatively was 2.0 (IQR, 1.0 to 4.0). Compared with the high-dose group, the low-dose group had increased blood loss (by 513.0 mL; p = 0.022) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.6 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.3 units; p = 0.024). The medium-dose group had increased blood loss (by 491.8 mL; p = 0.006) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.7 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.5 units; p < 0.001) compared with the high-dose group.

Conclusions: Patients with ASD who received high-dose intraoperative TXA had fewer RBC transfusions intraoperatively, fewer RBC transfusions perioperatively, and less blood loss than those who received low or medium-dose TXA, with no differences in the rates of seizure or thromboembolic complications.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:氨甲环酸(TXA)通常用于减少成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术中的失血量。尽管氨甲环酸被广泛使用,但人们对其最佳剂量方案缺乏共识。本研究旨在评估高、中、低剂量 TXA 方案在复杂 ASD 手术患者失血量和并发症方面的差异:对一个多中心数据库进行了回顾性分析,确定了 265 名复杂性 ASD 患者。按TXA方案将患者分为3组:(1)低剂量(50毫克/千克负荷剂量,≥5毫克/千克/小时维持剂量)。测量结果包括失血量、并发症、术中和围手术期输注的红细胞(RBC)单位。多变量分析控制了TXA剂量方案、融合水平、手术室时间、术前血红蛋白、3柱截骨和后椎间融合术:患者主要为白人(91.3%)和女性(69.1%),平均年龄为 61.6 岁。在265名患者中,54人(20.4%)接受了低剂量TXA,131人(49.4%)接受了中剂量TXA,80人(30.2%)接受了高剂量TXA。失血量中位数为 1,200 毫升(四分位数间距 [IQR],750 至 2,000)。术中输注的红细胞单位中位数为 1.0(IQR,0.0 至 2.0),围手术期输注的红细胞单位中位数为 2.0(IQR,1.0 至 4.0)。与高剂量组相比,低剂量组失血量增加(513.0 毫升;P = 0.022),术中输注的红细胞单位增加(0.6 个单位;P < 0.001),围手术期输注的红细胞单位增加(0.3 个单位;P = 0.024)。与高剂量组相比,中剂量组失血量增加(491.8 mL;p = 0.006),术中输注的红细胞单位增加(0.7个单位;p < 0.001),围手术期输注的红细胞单位增加(0.5个单位;p < 0.001):结论:与接受低剂量或中剂量TXA的患者相比,术中接受高剂量TXA的ASD患者术中输注的红细胞数量更少,围手术期输注的红细胞数量更少,失血量更少,但癫痫发作率或血栓栓塞并发症发生率没有差异:证据级别:治疗 III 级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
{"title":"High-Dose TXA Is Associated with Less Blood Loss Than Low-Dose TXA without Increased Complications in Patients with Complex Adult Spinal Deformity.","authors":"Andrew H Kim, Kevin C Mo, Andrew B Harris, Renaud Lafage, Brian J Neuman, Richard A Hostin, Alexandra Soroceanu, Han Jo Kim, Eric O Klineberg, Jeffrey L Gum, Munish C Gupta, D Kojo Hamilton, Frank Schwab, Doug Burton, Alan Daniels, Peter G Passias, Robert A Hart, Breton G Line, Christopher Ames, Virginie Lafage, Christopher I Shaffrey, Justin S Smith, Shay Bess, Lawrence Lenke, Khaled M Kebaish","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01323","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly utilized to reduce blood loss in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite its widespread use, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to assess differences in blood loss and complications between high, medium, and low-dose TXA regimens among patients undergoing surgery for complex ASD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter database was retrospectively analyzed to identify 265 patients with complex ASD. Patients were separated into 3 groups by TXA regimen: (1) low dose (<20-mg/kg loading dose with ≤2-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), (2) medium dose (20 to 50-mg/kg loading dose with 2 to 5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), and (3) high dose (>50-mg/kg loading dose with ≥5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose). The measured outcomes included blood loss, complications, and red blood cell (RBC) units transfused intraoperatively and perioperatively. The multivariable analysis controlled for TXA dosing regimen, levels fused, operating room time, preoperative hemoglobin, 3-column osteotomy, and posterior interbody fusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort was predominantly White (91.3%) and female (69.1%) and had a mean age of 61.6 years. Of the 265 patients, 54 (20.4%) received low-dose, 131 (49.4%) received medium-dose, and 80 (30.2%) received high-dose TXA. The median blood loss was 1,200 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 750 to 2,000). The median RBC units transfused intraoperatively was 1.0 (IQR, 0.0 to 2.0), and the median RBC units transfused perioperatively was 2.0 (IQR, 1.0 to 4.0). Compared with the high-dose group, the low-dose group had increased blood loss (by 513.0 mL; p = 0.022) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.6 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.3 units; p = 0.024). The medium-dose group had increased blood loss (by 491.8 mL; p = 0.006) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.7 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.5 units; p < 0.001) compared with the high-dose group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with ASD who received high-dose intraoperative TXA had fewer RBC transfusions intraoperatively, fewer RBC transfusions perioperatively, and less blood loss than those who received low or medium-dose TXA, with no differences in the rates of seizure or thromboembolic complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"2205-2214"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes Following Transtibial Amputation with and without a Tibiofibular Synostosis Procedure: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (TAOS Study). 经胫骨截肢伴或不伴胫腓骨关节融合术后的结果:一项多中心随机临床试验(TAOS研究)。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01408

Background: This study compared outcomes at 18 months between patients who underwent transtibial amputation with and without a tibiofibular synostosis procedure. We hypothesized that complication rates would be lower in patients who did not receive a synostosis procedure compared with those who did receive a synostosis procedure, but the synostosis group would report better function.

Methods: This multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) included patients aged 18 to 60 years who were treated without (n = 52) or with synostosis (n = 54) during transtibial amputation. Patients who refused randomization were enrolled in an observational (OBS) study (n = 93; 31 synostosis, 62 non-synostosis). There were 2 primary outcomes: operative treatment for a complication within 18 months of amputation and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores. The primary analyses were based on the RCT participants, and the secondary analyses were based on the treatment received by the combined RCT + OBS participants.

Results: In the primary RCT analysis, the probability of ≥1 operatively treated complication was higher for the synostosis group (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.8% to 56.2%) than the non-synostosis group (24%; 95% CI: 14.2% to 37.9%), with an absolute risk difference of 18% (95% CI: 0.31% to 36%). There were no appreciable differences in mean SMFA scores. In the secondary combined analysis, the probability of an operatively treatment complication was larger in patients who did versus did not receive a synostosis procedure (absolute risk difference: 26.1%; 95% CI: 12.0% to 40.3%). Differences in SMFA scores favored synostosis, although there were no differences in pain, prosthetic use, and satisfaction.

Conclusions: The results of the primary RCT analysis supported our hypothesis of fewer complications in patients who do not undergo a synostosis procedure compared with those who undergo a synostosis procedure, but we found insufficient evidence to conclude that those in the synostosis group have better function. The trial did not reach target enrollment. The secondary combined analysis supported the primary analysis in terms of complications. In the secondary analysis, while pain, prosthetic use, and satisfaction remained similar, the SMFA scores were better for the patients who received a synostosis procedure, although the differences are of uncertain clinical importance.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:本研究比较了经胫骨截肢伴和不伴胫腓骨关节融合术患者18个月时的结果。我们假设未接受融合术的患者与接受融合术的患者相比,并发症发生率较低,但融合术组报告功能较好。方法:这项多中心随机临床试验(RCT)纳入了年龄在18至60岁之间的患者,这些患者在经胫骨截肢过程中没有接受治疗(n = 52)或有关节闭锁(n = 54)。拒绝随机化的患者被纳入观察性(OBS)研究(n = 93;31例结膜紧闭,62例非结膜紧闭)。有2个主要结果:截肢18个月内并发症的手术治疗和短肌肉骨骼功能评估(SMFA)评分。主要分析基于RCT参与者,次要分析基于RCT + OBS联合参与者所接受的治疗。结果:在最初的RCT分析中,滑膜粘连组出现≥1个手术并发症的概率更高(42%;95%可信区间[CI]: 29.8% ~ 56.2%)比无缝合组(24%;95% CI: 14.2% ~ 37.9%),绝对风险差异为18% (95% CI: 0.31% ~ 36%)。在平均SMFA得分上没有明显的差异。在二次联合分析中,手术治疗并发症的概率在接受过与未接受过滑膜融合术的患者中更大(绝对风险差异:26.1%;95% CI: 12.0% ~ 40.3%)。尽管在疼痛、假体使用和满意度方面没有差异,但SMFA评分的差异更倾向于滑膜愈合。结论:最初的RCT分析结果支持我们的假设,即未接受融合术的患者比接受融合术的患者并发症更少,但我们没有找到足够的证据来得出融合术组患者具有更好的功能的结论。试验没有达到目标入组人数。二级联合分析在并发症方面支持初级分析。在二次分析中,虽然疼痛、假体使用和满意度保持相似,但接受关节融合术的患者的SMFA评分更好,尽管差异的临床重要性尚不确定。证据水平:治疗性i级。参见《作者说明》获得证据水平的完整描述。
{"title":"Outcomes Following Transtibial Amputation with and without a Tibiofibular Synostosis Procedure: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (TAOS Study).","authors":"","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared outcomes at 18 months between patients who underwent transtibial amputation with and without a tibiofibular synostosis procedure. We hypothesized that complication rates would be lower in patients who did not receive a synostosis procedure compared with those who did receive a synostosis procedure, but the synostosis group would report better function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) included patients aged 18 to 60 years who were treated without (n = 52) or with synostosis (n = 54) during transtibial amputation. Patients who refused randomization were enrolled in an observational (OBS) study (n = 93; 31 synostosis, 62 non-synostosis). There were 2 primary outcomes: operative treatment for a complication within 18 months of amputation and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores. The primary analyses were based on the RCT participants, and the secondary analyses were based on the treatment received by the combined RCT + OBS participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary RCT analysis, the probability of ≥1 operatively treated complication was higher for the synostosis group (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.8% to 56.2%) than the non-synostosis group (24%; 95% CI: 14.2% to 37.9%), with an absolute risk difference of 18% (95% CI: 0.31% to 36%). There were no appreciable differences in mean SMFA scores. In the secondary combined analysis, the probability of an operatively treatment complication was larger in patients who did versus did not receive a synostosis procedure (absolute risk difference: 26.1%; 95% CI: 12.0% to 40.3%). Differences in SMFA scores favored synostosis, although there were no differences in pain, prosthetic use, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the primary RCT analysis supported our hypothesis of fewer complications in patients who do not undergo a synostosis procedure compared with those who undergo a synostosis procedure, but we found insufficient evidence to conclude that those in the synostosis group have better function. The trial did not reach target enrollment. The secondary combined analysis supported the primary analysis in terms of complications. In the secondary analysis, while pain, prosthetic use, and satisfaction remained similar, the SMFA scores were better for the patients who received a synostosis procedure, although the differences are of uncertain clinical importance.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Medicare Payments for Facility Fees and Surgeon Professional Fees for Spine Surgeries. 医疗保险对脊柱手术设施费和外科医生专业费的支付趋势。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00228
Vincent P Federico, Alexander J Acuna, Luis M Salazar, Rajko Vucicevic, Austin Q Nguyen, Logan Reed, William E Harkin, Joseph Serino, Alexander J Butler, Matthew W Colman, Frank M Phillips
{"title":"Trends in Medicare Payments for Facility Fees and Surgeon Professional Fees for Spine Surgeries.","authors":"Vincent P Federico, Alexander J Acuna, Luis M Salazar, Rajko Vucicevic, Austin Q Nguyen, Logan Reed, William E Harkin, Joseph Serino, Alexander J Butler, Matthew W Colman, Frank M Phillips","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00228","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142739493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 2024 American Orthopaedic Association-Japanese Orthopaedic Association Traveling Fellowship. 2024 年美国矫形外科协会-日本矫形外科协会旅行奖学金。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.01011
Lucas S McDonald, Kelly K Hynes, Joshua A Parry, Byron F Stephens, Joseph H Schwab

Abstract: In 1992, the American Orthopaedic Association-Japanese Orthopaedic Association (AOA-JOA) Traveling Fellowship was created to develop and enhance collaboration between the Japanese and American orthopaedic communities. The fellowship is geared to early-career surgeons and fosters clinical and cultural exchange between members of the 2 countries. In 2024, the fellows hailed from around the United States: Kelly K. Hynes, Lucas S. McDonald, Joshua A. Parry, Joseph H. Schwab, and Byron F. Stephens all participated in the program. During the 3-week fellowship, the fellows visited 8 academic centers across Japan and attended the JOA Annual Meeting in Fukuoka. This experience was incredibly rewarding, both clinically and professionally, and all the fellows returned home with novel ideas for their clinical practices.

摘要:1992 年,美国矫形外科协会-日本矫形外科协会(AOA-JOA)设立了旅行奖学金,以发展和加强日本和美国矫形外科界之间的合作。该奖学金面向职业生涯初期的外科医生,促进两国成员之间的临床和文化交流。2024 年的研究员来自美国各地:Kelly K. Hynes、Lucas S. McDonald、Joshua A. Parry、Joseph H. Schwab 和 Byron F. Stephens 都参加了该项目。在为期三周的研究期间,研究员们访问了日本各地的8个学术中心,并参加了在福冈举行的JOA年会。无论是在临床上还是在专业上,这次经历都让学员们受益匪浅,所有学员都带着对临床实践的新想法回国。
{"title":"The 2024 American Orthopaedic Association-Japanese Orthopaedic Association Traveling Fellowship.","authors":"Lucas S McDonald, Kelly K Hynes, Joshua A Parry, Byron F Stephens, Joseph H Schwab","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01011","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In 1992, the American Orthopaedic Association-Japanese Orthopaedic Association (AOA-JOA) Traveling Fellowship was created to develop and enhance collaboration between the Japanese and American orthopaedic communities. The fellowship is geared to early-career surgeons and fosters clinical and cultural exchange between members of the 2 countries. In 2024, the fellows hailed from around the United States: Kelly K. Hynes, Lucas S. McDonald, Joshua A. Parry, Joseph H. Schwab, and Byron F. Stephens all participated in the program. During the 3-week fellowship, the fellows visited 8 academic centers across Japan and attended the JOA Annual Meeting in Fukuoka. This experience was incredibly rewarding, both clinically and professionally, and all the fellows returned home with novel ideas for their clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142739549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spine-Abductor Syndrome: Novel Associations Between Lumbar Spine Disease and Hip Gluteal Muscle Pathology. 脊柱-外展肌综合征:腰椎疾病与臀臀肌病理之间的新联系。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00012
Monish S Lavu, Christian J Hecht, David C Kaelber, George Grammatopoulos, Yasuhiro Homma, Atul F Kamath

Background: Risk factors for gluteal tears include age-related deterioration, female sex, and increased body mass index. As the literature that supports the sagittal relationship between the lumbar spine and the hip is increasing, there may be a parallel relationship between the perturbations in spinopelvic alignment caused by lumbar spine disease and gluteal muscle tears. Because no prior studies other than single-institution series have reported on this phenomenon, we investigated spine-abductor syndrome at the population level.

Methods: This study utilized TriNetX, a federated research network that continuously aggregates deidentified electronic health record data from >92 million patients across the United States. The relative risks of gluteal tear encounter diagnoses and procedures were calculated for patients with and without the following characteristics: age ≥45 years, female sex, obesity, lumbar spine diagnoses, lumbar spine injections, and lumbar spine surgery. Utilizing the Cox proportional hazard model, we also analyzed gluteal tear-free survival over a period of ≥10 years in subgroups of patients who had been diagnosed with lumbar pathology, had been administered a lumbar injection, or had received lumbar surgery.

Results: Of the 8,475,800 patients who had received lumbar spine diagnoses, undergone lumbar injections, and/or undergone lumbar surgeries, 458,311 patients (5.4%) had gluteal tears, representing a relative risk of 13.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]:13.6 to 13.6). After controlling for age, sex, and obesity, survival analysis showed markedly increased hazard ratios (HRs) for patients having a gluteal tear encounter diagnosis in the intervening 13 years (2010 to 2023) if they had had a previous lumbar spine pathology encounter diagnosis (HR: 4.8, 95% CI: 4.5 to 5.1), had undergone lumbar spine injections (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 6.2 to 9.5), or had undergone lumbar spine surgery (HR: 6.6, 95% CI: 5.3 to 8.1) in 2010.

Conclusions: These findings suggest a strong association between lumbar spine pathology and abductor tears. Further biomechanical and neuroanatomic studies may elucidate the effects of lumbar spine disease in relation to gluteal tears. Additionally, there may be a need to optimize diagnostic protocols for lateral hip pain in patients with a history of lumbar spine disease.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:臀肌撕裂的危险因素包括年龄相关性恶化、女性和体重指数增加。随着支持腰椎与髋关节矢状位关系的文献越来越多,腰椎疾病引起的脊柱骨盆位线紊乱与臀肌撕裂之间可能存在平行关系。由于除了单一机构的系列研究外,没有其他先前的研究报道过这种现象,因此我们在人群水平上调查了脊柱外展综合征。方法:本研究利用TriNetX,这是一个联邦研究网络,持续收集来自美国9200万患者的未识别电子健康记录数据。计算有或没有以下特征的患者发生臀撕裂的相对风险:年龄≥45岁、女性、肥胖、腰椎诊断、腰椎注射和腰椎手术。利用Cox比例风险模型,我们还分析了被诊断为腰椎病理、接受腰椎注射或接受腰椎手术的患者亚组中≥10年的臀肌无撕裂生存率。结果:在接受腰椎诊断、腰椎注射和/或腰椎手术的8,475,800例患者中,458,311例(5.4%)患者发生臀肌撕裂,相对风险为13.6(95%置信区间[CI]:13.6至13.6)。在控制了年龄、性别和肥胖因素后,生存分析显示,在13年(2010年至2023年)期间诊断为臀撕裂的患者,如果他们在2010年有过腰椎病理诊断(HR: 4.8, 95% CI: 4.5至5.1),接受过腰椎注射(HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 6.2至9.5),或接受过腰椎手术(HR: 6.6, 95% CI: 5.3至8.1),那么他们的风险比(HR)显著增加。结论:这些发现表明腰椎病理与外展肌撕裂之间有很强的联系。进一步的生物力学和神经解剖学研究可以阐明腰椎疾病对臀肌撕裂的影响。此外,对于有腰椎病史的患者,可能需要优化髋外侧疼痛的诊断方案。证据等级:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Spine-Abductor Syndrome: Novel Associations Between Lumbar Spine Disease and Hip Gluteal Muscle Pathology.","authors":"Monish S Lavu, Christian J Hecht, David C Kaelber, George Grammatopoulos, Yasuhiro Homma, Atul F Kamath","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors for gluteal tears include age-related deterioration, female sex, and increased body mass index. As the literature that supports the sagittal relationship between the lumbar spine and the hip is increasing, there may be a parallel relationship between the perturbations in spinopelvic alignment caused by lumbar spine disease and gluteal muscle tears. Because no prior studies other than single-institution series have reported on this phenomenon, we investigated spine-abductor syndrome at the population level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized TriNetX, a federated research network that continuously aggregates deidentified electronic health record data from >92 million patients across the United States. The relative risks of gluteal tear encounter diagnoses and procedures were calculated for patients with and without the following characteristics: age ≥45 years, female sex, obesity, lumbar spine diagnoses, lumbar spine injections, and lumbar spine surgery. Utilizing the Cox proportional hazard model, we also analyzed gluteal tear-free survival over a period of ≥10 years in subgroups of patients who had been diagnosed with lumbar pathology, had been administered a lumbar injection, or had received lumbar surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 8,475,800 patients who had received lumbar spine diagnoses, undergone lumbar injections, and/or undergone lumbar surgeries, 458,311 patients (5.4%) had gluteal tears, representing a relative risk of 13.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]:13.6 to 13.6). After controlling for age, sex, and obesity, survival analysis showed markedly increased hazard ratios (HRs) for patients having a gluteal tear encounter diagnosis in the intervening 13 years (2010 to 2023) if they had had a previous lumbar spine pathology encounter diagnosis (HR: 4.8, 95% CI: 4.5 to 5.1), had undergone lumbar spine injections (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 6.2 to 9.5), or had undergone lumbar spine surgery (HR: 6.6, 95% CI: 5.3 to 8.1) in 2010.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest a strong association between lumbar spine pathology and abductor tears. Further biomechanical and neuroanatomic studies may elucidate the effects of lumbar spine disease in relation to gluteal tears. Additionally, there may be a need to optimize diagnostic protocols for lateral hip pain in patients with a history of lumbar spine disease.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Novel Preoperative Scoring System to Accurately Predict Cord-Level Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Data Loss During Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Machine-Learning Approach. 一种新的术前评分系统,可以准确预测脊柱畸形手术中脊髓水平的术中神经监测数据丢失:一种机器学习方法。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00386
Nathan J Lee, Lawrence G Lenke, Varun Arvind, Ted Shi, Alexandra C Dionne, Chidebelum Nnake, Mitchell Yeary, Michael Fields, Matt Simhon, Anastasia Ferraro, Matthew Cooney, Erik Lewerenz, Justin L Reyes, Steven G Roth, Chun Wai Hung, Justin K Scheer, Thomas Zervos, Earl D Thuet, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar, Ronald A Lehman, Benjamin D Roye, Michael G Vitale, Fthimnir M Hassan

Background: An accurate knowledge of a patient's risk of cord-level intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data loss is important for an informed decision-making process prior to deformity correction, but no prediction tool currently exists.

Methods: A total of 1,106 patients with spinal deformity and 205 perioperative variables were included. A stepwise machine-learning (ML) approach using random forest (RF) analysis and multivariable logistic regression was performed. Patients were randomly allocated to training (75% of patients) and testing (25% of patients) groups. Feature score weights were derived by rounding up the regression coefficients from the multivariable logistic regression model. Variables in the final scoring calculator were automatically selected through the ML process to optimize predictive performance.

Results: Eight features were included in the scoring system: sagittal deformity angular ratio (sDAR) of ≥15 (score = 2), type-3 spinal cord shape (score = 2), conus level below L2 (score = 2), cervical upper instrumented vertebra (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic Cobb angle of ≥75° (score = 2), preoperative lower-extremity motor deficit (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic kyphosis of ≥80° (score = 1), and total deformity angular ratio (tDAR) of ≥25 (score = 1). Higher cumulative scores were associated with increased rates of cord-level IONM data loss: patients with a cumulative score of ≤2 had a cord-level IONM data loss rate of 0.9%, whereas those with a score of ≥7 had a loss rate of 86%. When evaluated in the testing group, the scoring system achieved an accuracy of 93%, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 94%, and an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.898.

Conclusions: This is the first study to provide an ML-derived preoperative scoring system that predicts cord-level IONM data loss during pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery with >90% accuracy.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:准确了解患者术中脐带水平神经监测(IONM)数据丢失的风险对于畸形矫正前的知情决策过程非常重要,但目前还没有预测工具。方法:共纳入1106例脊柱畸形患者和205个围手术期变量。采用随机森林(RF)分析和多变量逻辑回归的逐步机器学习(ML)方法。患者随机分配到训练组(75%的患者)和测试组(25%的患者)。通过对多变量logistic回归模型的回归系数进行四舍五入得到特征得分权重。通过ML过程自动选择最终计分计算器中的变量,优化预测性能。结果:评分系统包括八个特征:矢状面畸形角比(sDAR)≥15(评分= 2),3型脊髓形状(评分= 2),L2以下圆锥水平(评分= 2),颈椎上固定椎体(评分= 2),术前直立最大胸椎Cobb角≥75°(评分= 2),术前下肢运动缺陷(评分= 2),术前直立最大胸椎后凸≥80°(评分= 1),总畸形角比(tDAR)≥25(评分= 1)。较高的累积评分与脐带水平IONM数据丢失率增加相关:累积评分≤2的患者脐带水平IONM数据丢失率为0.9%,而评分≥7的患者脐带水平IONM数据丢失率为86%。在测试组中进行评估时,评分系统的准确率为93%,灵敏度为75%,特异性为94%,AUC(受试者工作特征曲线下面积)为0.898。结论:这是第一个提供基于ml的术前评分系统的研究,该系统可以预测儿童和成人脊柱畸形手术中脊髓水平IONM数据丢失,准确率为bbb90 %。证据等级:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"A Novel Preoperative Scoring System to Accurately Predict Cord-Level Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Data Loss During Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Machine-Learning Approach.","authors":"Nathan J Lee, Lawrence G Lenke, Varun Arvind, Ted Shi, Alexandra C Dionne, Chidebelum Nnake, Mitchell Yeary, Michael Fields, Matt Simhon, Anastasia Ferraro, Matthew Cooney, Erik Lewerenz, Justin L Reyes, Steven G Roth, Chun Wai Hung, Justin K Scheer, Thomas Zervos, Earl D Thuet, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar, Ronald A Lehman, Benjamin D Roye, Michael G Vitale, Fthimnir M Hassan","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate knowledge of a patient's risk of cord-level intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data loss is important for an informed decision-making process prior to deformity correction, but no prediction tool currently exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,106 patients with spinal deformity and 205 perioperative variables were included. A stepwise machine-learning (ML) approach using random forest (RF) analysis and multivariable logistic regression was performed. Patients were randomly allocated to training (75% of patients) and testing (25% of patients) groups. Feature score weights were derived by rounding up the regression coefficients from the multivariable logistic regression model. Variables in the final scoring calculator were automatically selected through the ML process to optimize predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight features were included in the scoring system: sagittal deformity angular ratio (sDAR) of ≥15 (score = 2), type-3 spinal cord shape (score = 2), conus level below L2 (score = 2), cervical upper instrumented vertebra (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic Cobb angle of ≥75° (score = 2), preoperative lower-extremity motor deficit (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic kyphosis of ≥80° (score = 1), and total deformity angular ratio (tDAR) of ≥25 (score = 1). Higher cumulative scores were associated with increased rates of cord-level IONM data loss: patients with a cumulative score of ≤2 had a cord-level IONM data loss rate of 0.9%, whereas those with a score of ≥7 had a loss rate of 86%. When evaluated in the testing group, the scoring system achieved an accuracy of 93%, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 94%, and an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.898.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to provide an ML-derived preoperative scoring system that predicts cord-level IONM data loss during pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery with >90% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two Decades Since the Unequal Treatment Report: The State of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Elective Total Hip and Knee Replacement Use. 不平等待遇报告二十年后:选择性全髋关节和膝关节置换术中种族、民族和社会经济差异的状况。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00347
Caroline P Thirukumaran, Jordan J Cruse, Patricia D Franklin, Benjamin F Ricciardi, Linda I Suleiman, Said A Ibrahim

Abstract: Published in 2003 by the Institute of Medicine, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care placed an unprecedented spotlight on disparities in the U.S. health-care system. In the 2 decades since the publication of that landmark report, disparities continue to be prevalent and remain an important significant national concern. This article synthesizes the evolution, current state, and future of racial and ethnic disparities in the use of elective total joint replacement surgeries. We contextualize our impressions with respect to the recommendations of the Unequal Treatment Report.

摘要:美国医学研究所(Institute of Medicine) 2003年发表的《不平等待遇:直面医疗保健中的种族和民族差异》(equal Treatment: facing Racial and Ethnic disparity in Health Care)一文,将美国医疗保健体系中的不平等问题置于前所未有的聚光灯下。在那份具有里程碑意义的报告发表以来的20年里,差距仍然普遍存在,仍然是一个重要的国家关切问题。本文综合了选择性全关节置换手术中种族和民族差异的演变、现状和未来。我们把我们对《不平等待遇报告》各项建议的印象放在背景中考虑。
{"title":"Two Decades Since the Unequal Treatment Report: The State of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Elective Total Hip and Knee Replacement Use.","authors":"Caroline P Thirukumaran, Jordan J Cruse, Patricia D Franklin, Benjamin F Ricciardi, Linda I Suleiman, Said A Ibrahim","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Published in 2003 by the Institute of Medicine, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care placed an unprecedented spotlight on disparities in the U.S. health-care system. In the 2 decades since the publication of that landmark report, disparities continue to be prevalent and remain an important significant national concern. This article synthesizes the evolution, current state, and future of racial and ethnic disparities in the use of elective total joint replacement surgeries. We contextualize our impressions with respect to the recommendations of the Unequal Treatment Report.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defining the Cost of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Multicenter, Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing and Cost Optimization Investigation. 确定关节镜下肩袖修复的成本:一个多中心、时间驱动的基于活动的成本和成本优化研究。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01351
Catherine J Fedorka, Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Matthew J Best, Harry H Liu, Xiaoran Zhang, Brett Sanders, Joseph A Abboud, Mohamad Y Fares, Jacob M Kirsch, Jason E Simon, Jarret Woodmass, Porter Jones, Derek A Haas, April D Armstrong, Uma Srikumaran, Eric R Wagner, Michael B Gottschalk, Adam Z Khan, John G Costouros, Jon J P Warner, Evan A O'Donnell

Background: Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a frequently performed outpatient orthopaedic surgery, with substantial financial implications for health-care systems. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a method for nuanced cost analysis and is a valuable tool for strategic health-care decision-making. The aim of this study was to apply the TDABC methodology to RCR procedures to identify specific avenues to optimize cost-efficiency within the health-care system in 2 critical areas: (1) the reduction of variability in the episode duration, and (2) the standardization of suture anchor acquisition costs.

Methods: Using a multicenter, retrospective design, this study incorporates data from all patients who underwent an RCR surgical procedure at 1 of 4 academic tertiary health systems across the United States. Data were extracted from Avant-Garde Health's Care Measurement platform and were analyzed utilizing TDABC methodology. Cost analysis was performed using 2 primary metrics: the opportunity costs arising from a possible reduction in episode duration variability, and the potential monetary savings achievable through the standardization of suture anchor costs.

Results: In this study, 921 RCR cases performed at 4 institutions had a mean episode duration cost of $4,094 ± $1,850. There was a significant threefold cost variability between the 10th percentile ($2,282) and the 90th percentile ($6,833) (p < 0.01). The mean episode duration was registered at 7.1 hours. The largest variability in the episode duration was time spent in the post-acute care unit and the ward after the surgical procedure. By reducing the episode duration variability, it was estimated that up to 640 care-hours could be saved annually at a single hospital. Likewise, standardizing suture anchor acquisition costs could generate direct savings totaling $217,440 across the hospitals.

Conclusions: This multicenter study offers valuable insights into RCR cost as a function of care pathways and suture anchor cost. It outlines avenues for achieving cost-savings and operational efficiency. These findings can serve as a foundational basis for developing health-economics models.

Level of evidence: Economic and Decision Analysis Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:肩袖修复(RCR)是一种经常进行的门诊骨科手术,对卫生保健系统具有重大的财政影响。时间驱动的作业成本法(TDABC)是一种细致入微的成本分析方法,是卫生保健战略决策的宝贵工具。本研究的目的是将TDABC方法应用于RCR程序,以确定在两个关键领域优化医疗系统成本效率的具体途径:(1)减少发作时间的可变性,(2)缝合锚架获取成本的标准化。方法:采用多中心回顾性设计,本研究纳入了美国4个学术三级卫生系统中1个接受RCR手术的所有患者的数据。数据从先锋健康护理测量平台提取,并使用TDABC方法进行分析。成本分析采用2个主要指标:因可能减少发作持续时间变化而产生的机会成本,以及通过缝合锚定成本标准化而实现的潜在资金节约。结果:在本研究中,在4个机构进行的921例RCR病例的平均发作时间成本为4,094±1,850美元。在第10百分位(2,282美元)和第90百分位(6,833美元)之间存在显著的3倍成本差异(p < 0.01)。平均发作时间为7.1小时。发作持续时间的最大变化是在急性后护理病房和手术后病房度过的时间。通过减少发作持续时间的可变性,估计在一家医院每年可节省多达640个护理小时。同样,标准化缝合锚的获取成本可以在整个医院直接节省总计217,440美元。结论:这项多中心研究为RCR成本作为护理途径和缝合锚定成本的函数提供了有价值的见解。它概述了实现成本节约和业务效率的途径。这些发现可作为发展卫生经济学模型的基础。证据等级:经济与决策分析三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Defining the Cost of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Multicenter, Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing and Cost Optimization Investigation.","authors":"Catherine J Fedorka, Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Matthew J Best, Harry H Liu, Xiaoran Zhang, Brett Sanders, Joseph A Abboud, Mohamad Y Fares, Jacob M Kirsch, Jason E Simon, Jarret Woodmass, Porter Jones, Derek A Haas, April D Armstrong, Uma Srikumaran, Eric R Wagner, Michael B Gottschalk, Adam Z Khan, John G Costouros, Jon J P Warner, Evan A O'Donnell","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a frequently performed outpatient orthopaedic surgery, with substantial financial implications for health-care systems. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a method for nuanced cost analysis and is a valuable tool for strategic health-care decision-making. The aim of this study was to apply the TDABC methodology to RCR procedures to identify specific avenues to optimize cost-efficiency within the health-care system in 2 critical areas: (1) the reduction of variability in the episode duration, and (2) the standardization of suture anchor acquisition costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a multicenter, retrospective design, this study incorporates data from all patients who underwent an RCR surgical procedure at 1 of 4 academic tertiary health systems across the United States. Data were extracted from Avant-Garde Health's Care Measurement platform and were analyzed utilizing TDABC methodology. Cost analysis was performed using 2 primary metrics: the opportunity costs arising from a possible reduction in episode duration variability, and the potential monetary savings achievable through the standardization of suture anchor costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 921 RCR cases performed at 4 institutions had a mean episode duration cost of $4,094 ± $1,850. There was a significant threefold cost variability between the 10th percentile ($2,282) and the 90th percentile ($6,833) (p < 0.01). The mean episode duration was registered at 7.1 hours. The largest variability in the episode duration was time spent in the post-acute care unit and the ward after the surgical procedure. By reducing the episode duration variability, it was estimated that up to 640 care-hours could be saved annually at a single hospital. Likewise, standardizing suture anchor acquisition costs could generate direct savings totaling $217,440 across the hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter study offers valuable insights into RCR cost as a function of care pathways and suture anchor cost. It outlines avenues for achieving cost-savings and operational efficiency. These findings can serve as a foundational basis for developing health-economics models.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Economic and Decision Analysis Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intraoperative Facet Joint Block Reduces Pain After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. 术中小关节阻滞减少斜腰椎椎体间融合后疼痛:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01480
Sung Hyeon Noh, Sang-Woo Lee, Jong-Moon Hwang, JinWoo Jung, Eunyoung Lee, Dae-Chul Cho, Chi Heon Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim

Background: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) results in less tissue damage than in other surgeries, but immediate postoperative pain occurs. Notably, facet joint widening occurs in the vertebral body after OLIF. We hypothesized that the application of a facet joint block to the area of widening would relieve facet joint pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of such injections on postoperative pain.

Methods: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled study randomized patients into 2 groups. Patients assigned to the active group received an intra-articular injection of a compound mixture of bupivacaine and triamcinolone, whereas patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of normal saline solution injection. Back and dominant leg pain were evaluated with use of a visual analog scale (VAS) at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively with use of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and VAS for back and dominant leg pain.

Results: Of the 61 patients who were included, 31 were randomized to the placebo group and 30 were randomized to the active group. Postoperative fentanyl consumption from patient-controlled analgesia was higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 36 hours postoperatively (p < 0.001) and decreased gradually in both groups. VAS back pain scores were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 48 hours postoperatively. On average, patients in the active group had a higher satisfaction score (p = 0.038) and were discharged 1.3 days earlier than those in the placebo group.

Conclusions: The use of an intraoperative facet joint block decreased pain perception during OLIF, thereby reducing opioid consumption and the severity of postoperative pain. This effect was also associated with a reduction in the length of the stay.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:斜腰椎体间融合术(OLIF)比其他手术造成的组织损伤更小,但术后立即出现疼痛。值得注意的是,OLIF术后椎体发生小关节增宽。我们假设应用小关节块扩大区域将减轻小关节疼痛。本研究的目的是评价这种注射对术后疼痛的镇痛作用。方法:本研究采用双盲、安慰剂对照,将患者随机分为两组。活性组患者接受布比卡因和曲安奈德酮的复合混合物的关节内注射,而安慰剂组患者接受等量的生理盐水溶液注射。在术后12、24、48和72小时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估背部和主要腿部疼痛。使用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和VAS评估术前和术后6个月的临床结果。结果:在纳入的61例患者中,31例随机分配到安慰剂组,30例随机分配到活性组。术后36小时内,安慰剂组患者自控镇痛的芬太尼用量高于活性组(p < 0.001),两组均逐渐下降。术后48小时,安慰剂组的VAS背痛评分明显高于活动组。平均而言,积极组患者满意度得分高于安慰剂组(p = 0.038),出院时间比安慰剂组早1.3天。结论:术中使用小关节块可降低OLIF期间的疼痛感觉,从而减少阿片类药物的消耗和术后疼痛的严重程度。这种效果还与住院时间的缩短有关。证据水平:治疗性i级。参见《作者说明》获得证据水平的完整描述。
{"title":"Intraoperative Facet Joint Block Reduces Pain After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sung Hyeon Noh, Sang-Woo Lee, Jong-Moon Hwang, JinWoo Jung, Eunyoung Lee, Dae-Chul Cho, Chi Heon Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01480","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) results in less tissue damage than in other surgeries, but immediate postoperative pain occurs. Notably, facet joint widening occurs in the vertebral body after OLIF. We hypothesized that the application of a facet joint block to the area of widening would relieve facet joint pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of such injections on postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blinded, placebo-controlled study randomized patients into 2 groups. Patients assigned to the active group received an intra-articular injection of a compound mixture of bupivacaine and triamcinolone, whereas patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of normal saline solution injection. Back and dominant leg pain were evaluated with use of a visual analog scale (VAS) at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively with use of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and VAS for back and dominant leg pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 61 patients who were included, 31 were randomized to the placebo group and 30 were randomized to the active group. Postoperative fentanyl consumption from patient-controlled analgesia was higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 36 hours postoperatively (p < 0.001) and decreased gradually in both groups. VAS back pain scores were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 48 hours postoperatively. On average, patients in the active group had a higher satisfaction score (p = 0.038) and were discharged 1.3 days earlier than those in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an intraoperative facet joint block decreased pain perception during OLIF, thereby reducing opioid consumption and the severity of postoperative pain. This effect was also associated with a reduction in the length of the stay.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thoracolumbar Fracture: A Natural History Study of Survival Following Injury. 胸腰椎骨折:损伤后生存的自然历史研究。
IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00706
Brendan M Striano, Alexander M Crawford, Jonathan Gong, Vineet Desai, Daniel C Gabriel, J Taylor Bellamy, Tino Mukorombindo, Lara L Cohen, Andrew K Simpson, Andrew J Schoenfeld

Background: Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are increasingly common. Although it is known that such fractures may elevate the risk of near-term morbidity, the natural history of patients who sustain such injuries remains poorly described. We sought to characterize the natural history of patients treated for thoracolumbar fractures and to understand clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with survival.

Methods: Patients treated for acute thoracic or lumbar spine fractures within a large academic health-care network between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and mortality data were obtained from medical records and administrative charts. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with survival, while adjusting for confounders. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: The study included 717 patients (median age, 66 years; 59.8% male; 69% non-Hispanic White). The mortality rate was 7.0% (n = 50), 16.2% (n = 116), and 20.4% (n = 146) at 3, 12, and 24 months following injury, respectively. In adjusted analysis, patients who died within the first year following injury were more likely to be older (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.05) and male (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.69). A higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index at presentation were also influential factors. The final model explained 81% (95% CI = 81% to 83%) of the variation in survival.

Conclusions: We identified a previously underappreciated fact: thoracolumbar fractures are associated with a mortality risk comparable with that of hip fractures. The risk of mortality is greatest in elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities. The results of our model can be used in patient and family counseling, informed decision-making, and resource allocation to mitigate the potential risk of near-term mortality in high-risk individuals.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

背景:胸腰椎骨折越来越常见。虽然已知此类骨折可能会增加近期发病的风险,但对此类损伤患者的自然病史仍知之甚少。我们试图描述胸腰椎骨折患者的自然病史,并了解与生存率相关的临床和社会人口学因素。方法:对2015年至2021年间在大型学术医疗网络中治疗急性胸椎或腰椎骨折的患者进行识别。临床、放射学和死亡率数据来自医疗记录和行政图表。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估生存率。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估与生存相关的因素,同时调整混杂因素。结果以比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)表示。结果:研究纳入717例患者(中位年龄66岁;男性59.8%;69%是非西班牙裔白人)。伤后3、12和24个月的死亡率分别为7.0% (n = 50)、16.2% (n = 116)和20.4% (n = 146)。在调整分析中,受伤后一年内死亡的患者更有可能年龄较大(OR = 1.03;95% CI = 1.01 ~ 1.05)和男性(OR = 1.67;95% CI = 1.05 ~ 2.69)。较高的损伤严重程度评分、较低的格拉斯哥昏迷评分和较高的就诊时Charlson合并症指数也是影响因素。最终模型解释了81% (95% CI = 81%至83%)的生存差异。结论:我们发现了一个以前未被重视的事实:胸腰椎骨折与髋部骨折的死亡风险相当。老年患者和有多种合并症的患者死亡风险最大。该模型的结果可用于患者和家属咨询、知情决策和资源分配,以减轻高风险个体近期死亡的潜在风险。证据等级:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Thoracolumbar Fracture: A Natural History Study of Survival Following Injury.","authors":"Brendan M Striano, Alexander M Crawford, Jonathan Gong, Vineet Desai, Daniel C Gabriel, J Taylor Bellamy, Tino Mukorombindo, Lara L Cohen, Andrew K Simpson, Andrew J Schoenfeld","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00706","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00706","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are increasingly common. Although it is known that such fractures may elevate the risk of near-term morbidity, the natural history of patients who sustain such injuries remains poorly described. We sought to characterize the natural history of patients treated for thoracolumbar fractures and to understand clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated for acute thoracic or lumbar spine fractures within a large academic health-care network between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and mortality data were obtained from medical records and administrative charts. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with survival, while adjusting for confounders. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 717 patients (median age, 66 years; 59.8% male; 69% non-Hispanic White). The mortality rate was 7.0% (n = 50), 16.2% (n = 116), and 20.4% (n = 146) at 3, 12, and 24 months following injury, respectively. In adjusted analysis, patients who died within the first year following injury were more likely to be older (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.05) and male (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.69). A higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index at presentation were also influential factors. The final model explained 81% (95% CI = 81% to 83%) of the variation in survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified a previously underappreciated fact: thoracolumbar fractures are associated with a mortality risk comparable with that of hip fractures. The risk of mortality is greatest in elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities. The results of our model can be used in patient and family counseling, informed decision-making, and resource allocation to mitigate the potential risk of near-term mortality in high-risk individuals.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1