Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology最新文献

Objectives: The objective of this study was to explore the safety and clinical effects of amisulpride in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Methods: This case series included six patients, aged 11 to 19 years, diagnosed with affective disorder, autism, anxiety, psychosis, and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and treated with amisulpride at doses ranging from 100 to 400 mg per day. Results: Amisulpride appeared to reduce psychotic and behavioral symptoms. Observed side effects included increased appetite, weight gain, sedation, and mild extrapyramidal symptoms. Conclusion: Amisulpride may have promise for study and future use in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders and severe symptoms.

Introduction: The effective management of irritability is a key need in young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole in children and adolescents with irritability associated with ASD. Methods: This was an 8-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04174365) and 26-week, open-label extension (OLE, NCT04258839) of brexpiprazole (0.25-3 mg/day based on body weight) in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with a diagnosis of ASD, score ≥18 on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability (ABC-I) subscale, and score ≥4 on the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale. Results: Of the 119 randomized participants (brexpiprazole = 60, placebo = 59), 104 completed double-blind treatment, and 95 enrolled and 70 completed the OLE. Similar reductions in mean ABC-I subscale score were seen in both groups (least-squares mean ± standard error reduction from double-blind baseline of -10.1 ± 1.3 with brexpiprazole vs -8.9 ± 1.3 with placebo). Thus, the primary endpoint did not show a significant treatment effect (LS-mean [95% confidence interval] treatment difference: -1.22 [-4.49, 2.05], p = 0.46) and the hierarchical efficacy analysis ended at this point. At the end of the OLE, participants had a mean ± SD reduction from open-label baseline of -6.1 ± 8.2 in ABC-I subscale score. During double-blind treatment, 51.7% participants treated with brexpiprazole had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) versus 35.1% with placebo; no severe or serious TEAEs were reported. The only potentially treatment-related TEAE that occurred in ≥5% of participants was somnolence (12.1% for brexpiprazole vs 5.3% for placebo). During the OLE, the most commonly reported TEAE was increased weight (n = 13, 13.7%). Conclusions: Treatment with brexpiprazole did not demonstrate significant efficacy versus placebo for the treatment of irritability associated with ASD. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in adult and adolescent patients with schizophrenia.

Objectives: Despite growing knowledge of the underlying neurobiology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related neurogenetic syndromes, treatment discovery has remained elusive. In this review, we provide a blueprint for translational precision medicine in ASD and related neurogenetic syndromes. Methods: The discovery of trofinetide for Rett syndrome (RTT) is described, and the role of nonmammalian, mammalian, and stem cell model systems in the identification of molecular targets and drug screening is discussed. We then provide a framework for translating preclinical findings to human clinical trials, including the role of biomarkers in selecting molecular targets and evaluating target engagement, and discuss how to leverage these findings for future ASD drug development. Results: Multiple preclinical model systems for ASD have been developed, each with tradeoffs with regard to suitability for high-throughput small molecule screening, conservation across species, and behavioral face validity. Future clinical trials should incorporate biomarkers and intermediate phenotypes to demonstrate target engagement. Factors that contributed to the approval of trofinetide for RTT included replicated findings in mouse models, a well-studied natural history of the syndrome, development of RTT-specific outcome measures, and strong engagement of the RTT family community. Conclusions: The translation of our growing understanding of the neurobiology of ASD to human drug discovery will require a precision medicine approach, including the use of multiple model systems for molecular target selection, evaluation of target engagement, and clinical trial design strategies that address heterogeneity, power, and the placebo response.

Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by deficits in social behavior and executive function (EF), particularly in cognitive flexibility. Whether transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can improve cognitive outcomes in patients with ASD remains an open question. We examined the acute effects of prefrontal TMS on cortical excitability and fluid cognition in individuals with ASD who underwent TMS for refractory major depression. Methods: We analyzed data from an open-label pilot study involving nine participants with ASD and treatment-resistant depression who received 30 sessions of accelerated theta burst stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, either unilaterally or bilaterally. Electroencephalography data were collected at baseline and 1, 4, and 12-weeks posttreatment and analyzed using a mixed-effects linear model to assess changes in regional cortical excitability using three models of spectral parametrization. Fluid cognition was measured using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognitive Battery. Results: Prefrontal TMS led to a decrease in prefrontal cortical excitability and an increase in right temporoparietal excitability, as measured using spectral exponent analysis. This was associated with a significant improvement in the NIH Toolbox Fluid Cognition Composite score and the Dimensional Change Card Sort subtest from baseline to 12 weeks posttreatment (t = 3.79, p = 0.005, n = 9). Improvement in depressive symptomatology was significant (HDRS-17, F (3, 21) = 28.49, p < 0.001) and there was a significant correlation between cognitive improvement at week 4 and improvement in depression at week 12 (r = 0.71, p = 0.05). Conclusion: These findings link reduced prefrontal excitability in patients with ASD and improvements in cognitive flexibility. The degree to which these mechanisms can be generalized to ASD populations without Major Depressive Disorder remains a compelling question for future research.

Objectives: Patterns of psychotropic medication use in children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS) are largely unknown. Clinical decisions are often made from evidence and experience from individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or intellectual disability (ID). Methods: Longitudinal data from 670 children with DS who received care in a specialty DS clinic from March 2021 to February 2024 were collected. After each clinic visit, the clinician indicated the presence or absence of co-occurring neurodevelopmental (ND) or mental health (MH) diagnoses, as well as whether the individual was prescribed a psychopharmacological treatment. We used descriptive statistics and analyzed associations between psychotropic medication use, co-occurring ND/MH conditions, and demographic data. Results: 19.1% of patients were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication at their most recent clinical visit. Alpha-agonists were the most commonly prescribed medication class (30.8%), followed by stimulants (18.9%), and antidepressants (16.7%). There was a significant difference in psychotropic medication use by age, with older children having increased odds of being prescribed a psychotropic medication. There were no differences in psychotropic medication use across sex (p = 0.10), race (p = 0.10), or household income (p = 0.16). Conclusions: We found that one-fifth of patients with DS were prescribed psychotropic medications. Nearly every individual with DS who was prescribed a psychotropic medication had a co-occurring ND/MH condition, yet these rates were lower than what have been reported in children with ID, ASD, and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Further research needs to include those with DS to further understand medication efficacy and safe dosing practices to ensure optimal outcomes.