Pub Date : 2021-11-01Epub Date: 2021-08-23DOI: 10.1177/10742484211041238
Belay Tesfamariam
Neonatal megakaryopoiesis and platelet turnover form a developmentally unique pattern by generating a pool of newly released reticulated platelets from the bone marrow into the circulation. Reticulated platelets are more reactive and hyperaggregable compared to mature platelets, due to their high residual mRNA content, large size, increased expression of platelet surface receptors, and degranulation. The proportion of reticulated platelets in neonates is higher compared to that in adults. Due to the emergence of an uninhibited platelet subpopulation, the newly formed reticulated platelet pool is inherently hyporesponsive to antiplatelets. An elevated population of reticulated platelets is often associated with increased platelet reactivity and is inversely related to high on-treatment platelet reactivity, which can contribute to ischemia. Measurements of the reticulated platelet subpopulation could be a useful indicator of increased tendency for platelet aggregation. Future research is anticipated to define the distinct functional properties of newly formed reticulated or immature platelets in neonates, as well as determine the impact of enhanced platelet turnover and high residual platelet reactivity on the response to antiplatelet agents.
{"title":"Impact of Reticulated Platelets on Platelet Reactivity in Neonates.","authors":"Belay Tesfamariam","doi":"10.1177/10742484211041238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211041238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal megakaryopoiesis and platelet turnover form a developmentally unique pattern by generating a pool of newly released reticulated platelets from the bone marrow into the circulation. Reticulated platelets are more reactive and hyperaggregable compared to mature platelets, due to their high residual mRNA content, large size, increased expression of platelet surface receptors, and degranulation. The proportion of reticulated platelets in neonates is higher compared to that in adults. Due to the emergence of an uninhibited platelet subpopulation, the newly formed reticulated platelet pool is inherently hyporesponsive to antiplatelets. An elevated population of reticulated platelets is often associated with increased platelet reactivity and is inversely related to high on-treatment platelet reactivity, which can contribute to ischemia. Measurements of the reticulated platelet subpopulation could be a useful indicator of increased tendency for platelet aggregation. Future research is anticipated to define the distinct functional properties of newly formed reticulated or immature platelets in neonates, as well as determine the impact of enhanced platelet turnover and high residual platelet reactivity on the response to antiplatelet agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 6","pages":"585-592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39346480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-01Epub Date: 2021-09-21DOI: 10.1177/10742484211046671
Jeffrey L Anderson, Stacey Knight, Raymond O McCubrey, Heidi T May, Steve Mason, Thomas J Bunch, David B Min, Michael J Cutler, Viet T Le, Joseph B Muhlestein, Kirk U Knowlton
Background: Flecainide is a useful antiarrhythmic for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, because of ventricular proarrhythmia risk, a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary artery disease (CAD) is a flecainide exclusion, and stress testing is used to exclude ischemia. We assessed whether absent/mild coronary artery calcium (CAC) can supplement or avoid the need for stress testing.
Methods: We assessed ischemic burden using regadenoson Rb-82 PET/CT in 1372 AF patients ≥50 years old without symptoms or signs of clinical CAD. CAC was determined qualitatively by low dose attenuation computed tomography (CT) (n = 816) or by quantitative CT (n = 556). Ischemic burden and clinical outcomes were compared by CAC burden.
Results: Patients with CAC absent or mild (n = 766, 57.2%) were younger, more frequently female, and had higher BMI but lower rates of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Average ischemic burden was lower in CAC-absent/mild patients, and CAC-absent/mild patients showed greater coronary flow reserve, had fewer referrals for coronary angiography, and less often had obstructive CAD. Revascularization at 90 days was lower, and the rate of longer-term major adverse cardiovascular events was favorable.
Conclusions: An easily administered, inexpensive, low radiation CAC scan can identify a subset of flecainide candidates with a low ischemic burden on PET stress testing that rarely needs coronary angiography/intervention and has favorable outcomes. Absent or mild CAC-burden combined with other clinical information may avoid or complement routine stress testing. However, additional, ideally randomized and multicenter trials are indicated to confirm these findings before replacing stress testing with CAC screening in selecting patients for flecainide therapy in clinical practice.
{"title":"Absent or Mild Coronary Calcium Predicts Low-Risk Stress Test Results and Outcomes in Patients Considered for Flecainide Therapy.","authors":"Jeffrey L Anderson, Stacey Knight, Raymond O McCubrey, Heidi T May, Steve Mason, Thomas J Bunch, David B Min, Michael J Cutler, Viet T Le, Joseph B Muhlestein, Kirk U Knowlton","doi":"10.1177/10742484211046671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211046671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flecainide is a useful antiarrhythmic for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, because of ventricular proarrhythmia risk, a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary artery disease (CAD) is a flecainide exclusion, and stress testing is used to exclude ischemia. We assessed whether absent/mild coronary artery calcium (CAC) can supplement or avoid the need for stress testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed ischemic burden using regadenoson Rb-82 PET/CT in 1372 AF patients ≥50 years old without symptoms or signs of clinical CAD. CAC was determined qualitatively by low dose attenuation computed tomography (CT) (n = 816) or by quantitative CT (n = 556). Ischemic burden and clinical outcomes were compared by CAC burden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with CAC absent or mild (n = 766, 57.2%) were younger, more frequently female, and had higher BMI but lower rates of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Average ischemic burden was lower in CAC-absent/mild patients, and CAC-absent/mild patients showed greater coronary flow reserve, had fewer referrals for coronary angiography, and less often had obstructive CAD. Revascularization at 90 days was lower, and the rate of longer-term major adverse cardiovascular events was favorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An easily administered, inexpensive, low radiation CAC scan can identify a subset of flecainide candidates with a low ischemic burden on PET stress testing that rarely needs coronary angiography/intervention and has favorable outcomes. Absent or mild CAC-burden combined with other clinical information may avoid or complement routine stress testing. However, additional, ideally randomized and multicenter trials are indicated to confirm these findings before replacing stress testing with CAC screening in selecting patients for flecainide therapy in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 6","pages":"648-655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39435742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01Epub Date: 2021-05-05DOI: 10.1177/10742484211011026
Antonis S Manolis, Antonis A Manolis, Theodora A Manolis, Helen Melita
In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, acute cardiac injury (ACI), as reflected by elevated cardiac troponin above the 99th percentile, has been observed in 8%-62% of patients with COVID-19 infection with highest incidence and mortality recorded in patients with severe infection. Apart from the clinically and electrocardiographically discernible causes of ACI, such as acute myocardial infarction (MI), other cardiac causes need to be considered such as myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, and direct injury from COVID-19, together with noncardiac conditions, such as pulmonary embolism, critical illness, and sepsis. Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with normal or near-normal coronary arteries (ACS-NNOCA) appear to have a higher prevalence in both COVID-19 positive and negative patients in the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic era. Echocardiography, coronary angiography, chest computed tomography and/or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may render a correct diagnosis, obviating the need for endomyocardial biopsy. Importantly, a significant delay has been recorded in patients with ACS seeking advice for their symptoms, while their routine care has been sharply disrupted with fewer urgent coronary angiographies and/or primary percutaneous coronary interventions performed in the case of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) with an inappropriate shift toward thrombolysis, all contributing to a higher complication rate in these patients. Thus, new challenges have emerged in rendering a diagnosis and delivering treatment in patients with ACI/ACS in the pandemic era. These issues, the various mechanisms involved in the development of ACI/ACS, and relevant current guidelines are herein reviewed.
{"title":"COVID-19 and Acute Myocardial Injury and Infarction: Related Mechanisms and Emerging Challenges.","authors":"Antonis S Manolis, Antonis A Manolis, Theodora A Manolis, Helen Melita","doi":"10.1177/10742484211011026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211011026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, acute cardiac injury (ACI), as reflected by elevated cardiac troponin above the 99th percentile, has been observed in 8%-62% of patients with COVID-19 infection with highest incidence and mortality recorded in patients with severe infection. Apart from the clinically and electrocardiographically discernible causes of ACI, such as acute myocardial infarction (MI), other cardiac causes need to be considered such as myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, and direct injury from COVID-19, together with noncardiac conditions, such as pulmonary embolism, critical illness, and sepsis. Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with normal or near-normal coronary arteries (ACS-NNOCA) appear to have a higher prevalence in both COVID-19 positive and negative patients in the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic era. Echocardiography, coronary angiography, chest computed tomography and/or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may render a correct diagnosis, obviating the need for endomyocardial biopsy. Importantly, a significant delay has been recorded in patients with ACS seeking advice for their symptoms, while their routine care has been sharply disrupted with fewer urgent coronary angiographies and/or primary percutaneous coronary interventions performed in the case of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) with an inappropriate shift toward thrombolysis, all contributing to a higher complication rate in these patients. Thus, new challenges have emerged in rendering a diagnosis and delivering treatment in patients with ACI/ACS in the pandemic era. These issues, the various mechanisms involved in the development of ACI/ACS, and relevant current guidelines are herein reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 5","pages":"399-414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10742484211011026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38883661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01Epub Date: 2021-03-25DOI: 10.1177/10742484211001853
Satomi Kagota, Kana Maruyama-Fumoto, John J McGuire, Kazumasa Shinozuka
Arterial perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) can elicit vasodilator signals complementary to those elicited by the endothelium in SHRSP.Z-Leprfa/IzmDmcr (SHRSP.ZF) rats, an animal model of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Here, we tested whether a glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2-i; tofogliflozin) increased this PVAT effect to prevent the deterioration of cardiac function in aging SHRSP.ZF rats. Tofogliflozin treatments (1 or 10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle (control) were administered for 10 weeks by oral gavage to SHRSP.ZF rats, starting at 13 weeks of age. At 23 weeks of age, glucose levels in the serum and urine (24 h after the last administration) were determined using commercial kits. Vasodilator responsiveness of PVAT-surrounded or PVAT-free superior mesenteric arteries was determined using acetylcholine with organ-bath methods. Cardiac ventricular function and coronary flow were determined using Langendorff heart preparations. Serum and urine glucose levels in SGLT2-i treatment groups did not differ from those in the controls, but the ratios of glycated to non-glycated albumin were lower than those in the controls. Tofogliflozin treatments did not alter relaxations in the presence of PVAT or affect relaxations of PVAT-free arteries. Left ventricular systolic pressures, maximum rate of pressure decline, and coronary flow in ex vivo hearts did not differ among the treatment groups. PVAT effects and cardiac dysfunction were not altered by tofogliflozin treatment in SHRSP.ZF rats with MetS. These results do not provide strong evidence to support the use of SGLT2-i as a cardiovascular protective therapy in MetS, which occurs prior to the onset of type 2 diabetes.
{"title":"A Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Fails to Improve Perivascular Adipose Tissue-Mediated Modulation of Vasodilation and Cardiac Function in Rats With Metabolic Syndrome.","authors":"Satomi Kagota, Kana Maruyama-Fumoto, John J McGuire, Kazumasa Shinozuka","doi":"10.1177/10742484211001853","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211001853","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arterial perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) can elicit vasodilator signals complementary to those elicited by the endothelium in SHRSP.Z-<i>Lepr<sup>fa</sup></i>/IzmDmcr (SHRSP.ZF) rats, an animal model of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Here, we tested whether a glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2-i; tofogliflozin) increased this PVAT effect to prevent the deterioration of cardiac function in aging SHRSP.ZF rats. Tofogliflozin treatments (1 or 10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle (control) were administered for 10 weeks by oral gavage to SHRSP.ZF rats, starting at 13 weeks of age. At 23 weeks of age, glucose levels in the serum and urine (24 h after the last administration) were determined using commercial kits. Vasodilator responsiveness of PVAT-surrounded or PVAT-free superior mesenteric arteries was determined using acetylcholine with organ-bath methods. Cardiac ventricular function and coronary flow were determined using Langendorff heart preparations. Serum and urine glucose levels in SGLT2-i treatment groups did not differ from those in the controls, but the ratios of glycated to non-glycated albumin were lower than those in the controls. Tofogliflozin treatments did not alter relaxations in the presence of PVAT or affect relaxations of PVAT-free arteries. Left ventricular systolic pressures, maximum rate of pressure decline, and coronary flow in <i>ex vivo</i> hearts did not differ among the treatment groups. PVAT effects and cardiac dysfunction were not altered by tofogliflozin treatment in SHRSP.ZF rats with MetS. These results do not provide strong evidence to support the use of SGLT2-i as a cardiovascular protective therapy in MetS, which occurs prior to the onset of type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 5","pages":"480-489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10742484211001853","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25528317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01Epub Date: 2021-04-09DOI: 10.1177/10742484211005929
Truong H Hoang, Pavel V Lazarev, Victor V Maiskov, Imad A Merai, Zhanna D Kobalava
Background: Atherothrombosis is the principal mechanism of type 1 (T1) myocardial infarction (MI), while type 2 (T2) MI is typically diagnosed in the presence of triggers (anemia, arrhythmia, etc.). We aimed to evaluate the proportions of T1 vs. T2 MI based on angiographic and clinical definitions, their concordance and prognosis.
Methods: Consecutive MI patients [n = 712, 61% male; age 64.6 ± 12.3 years] undergoing coronary angiography were classified according to the presence of atherothrombosis and identifiable triggers. Association of angiographic and clinical MI type criteria with adverse outcomes (Time follow-up was 1.5 years) was evaluated. Predictive ability of GRACE risk score for all-cause mortality was then assessed.
Results: Atherothrombosis and clinical triggers were identified in 397 (55.6%) and 324 (45.5%) subjects, respectively. Only 247 (34.7%) patients had "true" T1MI (atherothrombosis+ / triggers-); 174 (24.4%) were diagnosed with "true" T2MI (atherothrombosis- / triggers+), while 291 (40.9%) had discordant clinical and angiographic characteristics. All-cause mortality in T2MI (20.1%) patients was higher than in T1MI (9.3%), P = 0.002. Presence of triggers [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.6, P < 0.0001] but not atherothrombosis [OR 0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-1.3, P = 0.26] was associated with worse prognosis. GRACE score is a better predictor of death in T1MI vs. T2MI: area under curve 0.893 (95% CI 0.830-0.956) vs 0.748 (95% CI 0.652-0.843), P = 0.013.
Conclusion: Angiographic and clinical definitions of MI type are discordant in a substantial proportion of patients. Clinical triggers are associated with all-cause mortality. Predictive performance of GRACE score is worse in T2MI patients.
背景:动脉粥样硬化血栓形成是1型(T1)心肌梗死(MI)的主要机制,而2型(T2)心肌梗死通常在存在触发因素(贫血、心律失常等)时诊断。我们的目的是根据血管造影和临床定义、它们的一致性和预后来评估T1和T2心肌梗死的比例。方法:连续的心肌梗死患者[n = 712, 61%为男性;年龄(64.6±12.3岁)根据有无动脉粥样硬化形成及可识别的触发因素进行冠状动脉造影。评估血管造影和临床心肌梗死类型标准与不良结局的关系(随访时间为1.5年)。然后评估GRACE风险评分对全因死亡率的预测能力。结果:在397例(55.6%)和324例(45.5%)受试者中分别发现动脉粥样硬化血栓形成和临床触发因素。只有247例(34.7%)患者为“真”T1MI(动脉粥样硬化+ /诱因-);174例(24.4%)被诊断为“真正的”T2MI(动脉粥样硬化血栓形成- /触发+),291例(40.9%)的临床和血管造影特征不一致。T2MI患者的全因死亡率(20.1%)高于T1MI患者(9.3%),P = 0.002。诱发因素的存在[比值比(OR) 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.6, P < 0.0001]但与动脉粥样硬化血栓形成无关[比值比(OR) 0.8, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.5-1.3, P = 0.26]与预后不良相关。GRACE评分能更好地预测T1MI与T2MI的死亡:曲线下面积0.893 (95% CI 0.830-0.956) vs 0.748 (95% CI 0.652-0.843), P = 0.013。结论:相当比例的患者心肌梗死类型的血管造影和临床定义不一致。临床诱因与全因死亡率有关。T2MI患者GRACE评分的预测性能较差。
{"title":"Concordance and Prognostic Relevance of Angiographic and Clinical Definitions of Myocardial Infarction Type.","authors":"Truong H Hoang, Pavel V Lazarev, Victor V Maiskov, Imad A Merai, Zhanna D Kobalava","doi":"10.1177/10742484211005929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211005929","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atherothrombosis is the principal mechanism of type 1 (T1) myocardial infarction (MI), while type 2 (T2) MI is typically diagnosed in the presence of triggers (anemia, arrhythmia, etc.). We aimed to evaluate the proportions of T1 vs. T2 MI based on angiographic and clinical definitions, their concordance and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive MI patients [n = 712, 61% male; age 64.6 ± 12.3 years] undergoing coronary angiography were classified according to the presence of atherothrombosis and identifiable triggers. Association of angiographic and clinical MI type criteria with adverse outcomes (Time follow-up was 1.5 years) was evaluated. Predictive ability of GRACE risk score for all-cause mortality was then assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Atherothrombosis and clinical triggers were identified in 397 (55.6%) and 324 (45.5%) subjects, respectively. Only 247 (34.7%) patients had \"true\" T1MI (atherothrombosis+ / triggers-); 174 (24.4%) were diagnosed with \"true\" T2MI (atherothrombosis- / triggers+), while 291 (40.9%) had discordant clinical and angiographic characteristics. All-cause mortality in T2MI (20.1%) patients was higher than in T1MI (9.3%), <i>P</i> = 0.002. Presence of triggers [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001] but not atherothrombosis [OR 0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-1.3, <i>P</i> = 0.26] was associated with worse prognosis. GRACE score is a better predictor of death in T1MI vs. T2MI: area under curve 0.893 (95% CI 0.830-0.956) vs 0.748 (95% CI 0.652-0.843), <i>P</i> = 0.013.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Angiographic and clinical definitions of MI type are discordant in a substantial proportion of patients. Clinical triggers are associated with all-cause mortality. Predictive performance of GRACE score is worse in T2MI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 5","pages":"463-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10742484211005929","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25578119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01Epub Date: 2021-04-12DOI: 10.1177/10742484211006998
Mitulkumar Patel, Tania Ahuja, Serena Arnouk, Claudia Gidea, Alex Reyentovich, Deane E Smith, Nader Moazami, John Papadopoulos, Tyler C Lewis
Background: There is a lack of robust data evaluating outcomes of enoxaparin "bridge" therapy in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare HVAD recipients that received therapeutic enoxaparin as "bridge" therapy to describe bleeding and thrombotic events and compare outcomes between devices. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding within 30 days of "bridge" episode. Major bleeding was defined by INTERMACS criteria.
Results: We evaluated 257 "bridge" episodes in 54 patients, 35 with a HM II device and 19 with an HVAD device that underwent 176 and 81 bridging episodes, respectively. The median INR prior to "bridge" was lower in the HM II group compared to the HVAD group (1.5 vs 1.7, P < .01), however, there was no difference in the median duration of "bridge" therapy (7 vs 7 days, P = .42). There were a total of 30 (12%) bleeding episodes, with the majority in the HM II group vs HVAD (26 [15%] vs 4 [5%], P = .02). We observed 3 (1%) thromboembolic events in 2 (4%) patients with an HVAD device. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a HM II device was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of bleeding.
Conclusion: We found the use of enoxaparin "bridge" therapy to be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding in patients with a HM II device compared with an HVAD device. Assessment of device- and patient-specific factors should be evaluated to minimize bleeding events.
背景:缺乏可靠的数据评估依诺肝素“桥”治疗左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的结果。方法:我们对接受治疗性依诺肝素作为“桥”治疗的HeartMate II (HM II)和HeartWare HVAD受体进行了回顾性研究,以描述出血和血栓事件,并比较两种设备的结果。主要终点是“过桥”发作后30天内出血的发生率。根据INTERMACS标准定义大出血。结果:我们评估了54例患者的257次桥接发作,其中35例使用HM II装置,19例使用HVAD装置,分别发生了176次和81次桥接发作。与HVAD组相比,HM II组“桥接”前的中位INR较低(1.5 vs 1.7, P < 0.01),然而,“桥接”治疗的中位持续时间没有差异(7 vs 7天,P = 0.42)。总共有30例(12%)出血,HM II组和HVAD组出血最多(26例[15%]对4例[5%],P = .02)。我们在2例(4%)HVAD患者中观察到3例(1%)血栓栓塞事件。在多变量分析中,HM II装置的存在与出血风险增加4倍相关。结论:我们发现,与HVAD装置相比,使用依诺肝素“桥”治疗与HM II装置患者更高的出血发生率相关。应评估器械和患者的特定因素,以尽量减少出血事件。
{"title":"Comparison of Outcomes of Enoxaparin Bridge Therapy in HeartMate II versus HeartWare HVAD Recipients.","authors":"Mitulkumar Patel, Tania Ahuja, Serena Arnouk, Claudia Gidea, Alex Reyentovich, Deane E Smith, Nader Moazami, John Papadopoulos, Tyler C Lewis","doi":"10.1177/10742484211006998","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211006998","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of robust data evaluating outcomes of enoxaparin \"bridge\" therapy in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare HVAD recipients that received therapeutic enoxaparin as \"bridge\" therapy to describe bleeding and thrombotic events and compare outcomes between devices. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding within 30 days of \"bridge\" episode. Major bleeding was defined by INTERMACS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 257 \"bridge\" episodes in 54 patients, 35 with a HM II device and 19 with an HVAD device that underwent 176 and 81 bridging episodes, respectively. The median INR prior to \"bridge\" was lower in the HM II group compared to the HVAD group (1.5 vs 1.7, <i>P</i> < .01), however, there was no difference in the median duration of \"bridge\" therapy (7 vs 7 days, <i>P</i> = .42). There were a total of 30 (12%) bleeding episodes, with the majority in the HM II group vs HVAD (26 [15%] vs 4 [5%], <i>P</i> = .02). We observed 3 (1%) thromboembolic events in 2 (4%) patients with an HVAD device. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a HM II device was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found the use of enoxaparin \"bridge\" therapy to be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding in patients with a HM II device compared with an HVAD device. Assessment of device- and patient-specific factors should be evaluated to minimize bleeding events.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 5","pages":"473-479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10742484211006998","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25581835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01DOI: 10.1177/10742484221084772
Robert W. Ariss, Rajesh Gupta
Purpose: Interest in improving residual cardiovascular (CV) risk by targeting multiple causative pathways has been growing. Several medications including icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe have been shown to individually improve outcomes in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond conventional therapy consisting of aspirin and statins. While each drug has been shown to individually improve outcomes, the expected treatment benefit of the combined use of these drugs for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD is not known. Methods: In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated the aggregate treatment effect of comprehensive medical therapy consisting of icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe added to background aspirin and statin therapy through established methods of indirect comparisons of the results of three key clinical trials (REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179], COMPASS [n = 27,395], and IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144]). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included each individual component of the primary endpoint. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) of the imputed aggregate treatment effects for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD with comprehensive disease modifying therapy compared to aspirin and statin alone for the primary endpoint was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.61). The HR for CV death was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), non-fatal MI was 0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69), and non-fatal stroke was 0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: The estimated aggregate treatment effect of enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD through comprehensive medical therapy is substantial. This exploratory analysis supports further study of comprehensive therapy to reduce residual CV risk for the secondary prevention of ASCVD.
目的:通过针对多种致病途径来改善剩余心血管(CV)风险的兴趣越来越大。几种药物,包括伊沙喷二乙基、利伐沙班和依折替米贝,已被证明在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的二级预防中,比阿司匹林和他汀类药物的常规治疗更能单独改善预后。虽然每种药物已被证明可以单独改善预后,但联合使用这些药物增强ASCVD二级预防的预期治疗益处尚不清楚。方法:在交叉试验分析中,我们通过建立的三个关键临床试验(REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179]、COMPASS [n = 27,395]和IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144])的间接比较方法,估计了在阿司匹林和他汀类药物的背景治疗中加入伊沙苯乙酯、利伐沙班和依折替米贝的综合药物治疗的总体治疗效果。主要终点为心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)或非致死性卒中的复合终点。次要终点包括主要终点的每个单独组成部分。结果:与阿司匹林和他汀类药物单独用于主要终点相比,综合疾病改善治疗增强ASCVD二级预防的估算总体治疗效果的风险比(HR)为0.51(95%可信区间[CI] 0.42-0.61)。CV死亡的HR为0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85),非致死性MI为0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69),非致死性卒中为0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54)。敏感性分析结果相似。结论:通过综合药物治疗加强ASCVD二级预防的综合治疗效果是可观的。该探索性分析支持进一步研究降低ASCVD二级预防残余CV风险的综合治疗。
{"title":"Estimated Aggregate Treatment Benefit With Addition of Multiple Novel Medications for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease","authors":"Robert W. Ariss, Rajesh Gupta","doi":"10.1177/10742484221084772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484221084772","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Interest in improving residual cardiovascular (CV) risk by targeting multiple causative pathways has been growing. Several medications including icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe have been shown to individually improve outcomes in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond conventional therapy consisting of aspirin and statins. While each drug has been shown to individually improve outcomes, the expected treatment benefit of the combined use of these drugs for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD is not known. Methods: In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated the aggregate treatment effect of comprehensive medical therapy consisting of icosapent ethyl, rivaroxaban, and ezetimibe added to background aspirin and statin therapy through established methods of indirect comparisons of the results of three key clinical trials (REDUCE-IT [n = 8,179], COMPASS [n = 27,395], and IMPROVE-IT [n = 18,144]). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included each individual component of the primary endpoint. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) of the imputed aggregate treatment effects for enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD with comprehensive disease modifying therapy compared to aspirin and statin alone for the primary endpoint was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.61). The HR for CV death was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), non-fatal MI was 0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.69), and non-fatal stroke was 0.35 (95% CI 0.23-0.54). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: The estimated aggregate treatment effect of enhanced secondary prevention of ASCVD through comprehensive medical therapy is substantial. This exploratory analysis supports further study of comprehensive therapy to reduce residual CV risk for the secondary prevention of ASCVD.","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42000662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01Epub Date: 2021-04-12DOI: 10.1177/10742484211006997
Emir M Muzurović, Snežana Vujošević, Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic and complex metabolic disorder and also an important cause of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD). Patients with type 2 DM (T2DM) and obesity show a greater propensity for visceral fat deposition (and excessive fat deposits elsewhere) and the link between adiposity and CVD risk is greater for visceral than for subcutaneous (SC) adipose tissue (AT). There is growing evidence that epicardial AT (EAT) and pericardial AT (PAT) play a role in the development of DM-related atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial dysfunction, and heart failure (HF). In this review, we will highlight the importance of PAT and EAT in patients with DM. We also consider therapeutic interventions that could have a beneficial effect in terms of reducing the amount of AT and thus CV risk. EAT is biologically active and a likely determinant of CV morbidity and mortality in patients with DM, given its anatomical characteristics and proinflammatory secretory pattern. Consequently, modification of EAT/PAT may become a therapeutic target to reduce the CV burden. In patients with DM, a low calorie diet, exercise, antidiabetics and statins may change the quantity of EAT, PAT or both, alter the secretory pattern of EAT, improve the metabolic profile, and reduce inflammation. However, well-designed studies are needed to clearly define CV benefits and a therapeutic approach to EAT/PAT in patients with DM.
{"title":"Can We Decrease Epicardial and Pericardial Fat in Patients With Diabetes?","authors":"Emir M Muzurović, Snežana Vujošević, Dimitri P Mikhailidis","doi":"10.1177/10742484211006997","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211006997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic and complex metabolic disorder and also an important cause of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD). Patients with type 2 DM (T2DM) and obesity show a greater propensity for visceral fat deposition (and excessive fat deposits elsewhere) and the link between adiposity and CVD risk is greater for visceral than for subcutaneous (SC) adipose tissue (AT). There is growing evidence that epicardial AT (EAT) and pericardial AT (PAT) play a role in the development of DM-related atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial dysfunction, and heart failure (HF). In this review, we will highlight the importance of PAT and EAT in patients with DM. We also consider therapeutic interventions that could have a beneficial effect in terms of reducing the amount of AT and thus CV risk. EAT is biologically active and a likely determinant of CV morbidity and mortality in patients with DM, given its anatomical characteristics and proinflammatory secretory pattern. Consequently, modification of EAT/PAT may become a therapeutic target to reduce the CV burden. In patients with DM, a low calorie diet, exercise, antidiabetics and statins may change the quantity of EAT, PAT or both, alter the secretory pattern of EAT, improve the metabolic profile, and reduce inflammation. However, well-designed studies are needed to clearly define CV benefits and a therapeutic approach to EAT/PAT in patients with DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 5","pages":"415-436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10742484211006997","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25581836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01Epub Date: 2021-03-29DOI: 10.1177/10742484211001861
Diego Lezama-Martinez, Maria Elena Hernandez-Campos, Jazmin Flores-Monroy, Ignacio Valencia-Hernandez, Luisa Martinez-Aguilar
Clinical guidelines suggest the combination of 2 drugs as a strategy to treat hypertension. However, some antihypertensive combinations have been shown to be ineffective. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether differences exist between the results of monotherapy and combination therapy by temporal monitoring of the responses to angiotensin II and norepinephrine, which are vasoconstrictors involved in the development of hypertension. Thus, the purpose of this work was to determine the vascular reactivity to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) aortic rings after treatment with valsartan, lisinopril, nebivolol, nebivolol-lisinopril, and nebivolol-valsartan for different periods of time. In this study, male SHR and Wistar Kyoto normotensive (WKY) rats were divided into 7 groups treated for 1, 2, and 4 weeks: (1) WKY + vehicle, (2) SHR + vehicle; (3) SHR + nebivolol; (4) SHR + lisinopril; (5) SHR + valsartan; (6) SHR + nebivolol-lisinopril; and (7) SHR + nebivolol-valsartan. Blood pressure was measured by the tail-cuff method, and vascular reactivity was determined from the concentration-response curve to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in aortic rings. The results showed that the combined and individual treatments reduced mean blood pressure at all times evaluated. All treatments decreased vascular reactivity to angiotensin II; however, in the case of lisinopril and nebivolol-lisinopril, the effect observed was significant up to 2 weeks. All treatments decreased the reactivity to norepinephrine up to week 4. These results show a time-dependent difference in vascular reactivity between the pharmacological treatments, with nebivolol-valsartan and nebivolol-lisinopril being both effective combinations. Additionally, the results suggest crosstalk between the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems to reduce blood pressure and to improve treatment efficacy.
{"title":"Time-Dependent Effects of Individual and Combined Treatments With Nebivolol, Lisinopril, and Valsartan on Blood Pressure and Vascular Reactivity to Angiotensin II and Norepinephrine.","authors":"Diego Lezama-Martinez, Maria Elena Hernandez-Campos, Jazmin Flores-Monroy, Ignacio Valencia-Hernandez, Luisa Martinez-Aguilar","doi":"10.1177/10742484211001861","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10742484211001861","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical guidelines suggest the combination of 2 drugs as a strategy to treat hypertension. However, some antihypertensive combinations have been shown to be ineffective. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether differences exist between the results of monotherapy and combination therapy by temporal monitoring of the responses to angiotensin II and norepinephrine, which are vasoconstrictors involved in the development of hypertension. Thus, the purpose of this work was to determine the vascular reactivity to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) aortic rings after treatment with valsartan, lisinopril, nebivolol, nebivolol-lisinopril, and nebivolol-valsartan for different periods of time. In this study, male SHR and Wistar Kyoto normotensive (WKY) rats were divided into 7 groups treated for 1, 2, and 4 weeks: (1) WKY + vehicle, (2) SHR + vehicle; (3) SHR + nebivolol; (4) SHR + lisinopril; (5) SHR + valsartan; (6) SHR + nebivolol-lisinopril; and (7) SHR + nebivolol-valsartan. Blood pressure was measured by the tail-cuff method, and vascular reactivity was determined from the concentration-response curve to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in aortic rings. The results showed that the combined and individual treatments reduced mean blood pressure at all times evaluated. All treatments decreased vascular reactivity to angiotensin II; however, in the case of lisinopril and nebivolol-lisinopril, the effect observed was significant up to 2 weeks. All treatments decreased the reactivity to norepinephrine up to week 4. These results show a time-dependent difference in vascular reactivity between the pharmacological treatments, with nebivolol-valsartan and nebivolol-lisinopril being both effective combinations. Additionally, the results suggest crosstalk between the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems to reduce blood pressure and to improve treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 5","pages":"490-499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25527059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01Epub Date: 2021-04-09DOI: 10.1177/10742484211006531
Stacy Mandras, Gabor Kovacs, Horst Olschewski, Meredith Broderick, Andrew Nelsen, Eric Shen, Hunter Champion
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic and progressive disorder characterized by vascular remodeling of the small pulmonary arteries, resulting in elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and ultimately, right ventricular failure. Expanded understanding of PAH pathophysiology as it pertains to the nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2) (PGI2) and endothelin-1 pathways has led to recent advancements in targeted drug development and substantial improvements in morbidity and mortality. There are currently several classes of drugs available to target these pathways including phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i), soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators, prostacyclin class agents and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). Combination therapy in PAH, either upfront or sequentially, has become a widely adopted treatment strategy, allowing for simultaneous targeting of more than one of these signaling pathways implicated in disease progression. Much of the current treatment landscape has focused on initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil, an ERA and PDE5I respectively, following results of the AMBITION study demonstrating combination to be superior to either agent alone as upfront therapy. Consequently, clinicians often consider combination therapy with other drugs and drug classes, as deemed clinically appropriate, for patients with PAH. An alternative regimen that targets the NO and PGI2 pathways has been adopted by some clinicians as an effective and sometimes preferred therapeutic combination for PAH. Although there is a paucity of prospective data, preclinical data and results from secondary data analysis of clinical studies targeting these pathways may provide novel insights into this alternative combination as a reasonable, and sometimes preferred, alternative approach to combination therapy in PAH. This review of preclinical and clinical data will discuss the current understanding of combination therapy that simultaneously targets the NO and PGI2 signaling pathways, highlighting the clinical advantages and theoretical biochemical interplay of these agents.
{"title":"Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Targeting the Nitric Oxide and Prostacyclin Pathways.","authors":"Stacy Mandras, Gabor Kovacs, Horst Olschewski, Meredith Broderick, Andrew Nelsen, Eric Shen, Hunter Champion","doi":"10.1177/10742484211006531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211006531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic and progressive disorder characterized by vascular remodeling of the small pulmonary arteries, resulting in elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and ultimately, right ventricular failure. Expanded understanding of PAH pathophysiology as it pertains to the nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin (prostaglandin I<sub>2</sub>) (PGI<sub>2</sub>) and endothelin-1 pathways has led to recent advancements in targeted drug development and substantial improvements in morbidity and mortality. There are currently several classes of drugs available to target these pathways including phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i), soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators, prostacyclin class agents and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). Combination therapy in PAH, either upfront or sequentially, has become a widely adopted treatment strategy, allowing for simultaneous targeting of more than one of these signaling pathways implicated in disease progression. Much of the current treatment landscape has focused on initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil, an ERA and PDE5I respectively, following results of the AMBITION study demonstrating combination to be superior to either agent alone as upfront therapy. Consequently, clinicians often consider combination therapy with other drugs and drug classes, as deemed clinically appropriate, for patients with PAH. An alternative regimen that targets the NO and PGI<sub>2</sub> pathways has been adopted by some clinicians as an effective and sometimes preferred therapeutic combination for PAH. Although there is a paucity of prospective data, preclinical data and results from secondary data analysis of clinical studies targeting these pathways may provide novel insights into this alternative combination as a reasonable, and sometimes preferred, alternative approach to combination therapy in PAH. This review of preclinical and clinical data will discuss the current understanding of combination therapy that simultaneously targets the NO and PGI<sub>2</sub> signaling pathways, highlighting the clinical advantages and theoretical biochemical interplay of these agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 5","pages":"453-462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10742484211006531","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25578118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}