Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics最新文献

Background: Atherothrombosis is the principal mechanism of type 1 (T1) myocardial infarction (MI), while type 2 (T2) MI is typically diagnosed in the presence of triggers (anemia, arrhythmia, etc.). We aimed to evaluate the proportions of T1 vs. T2 MI based on angiographic and clinical definitions, their concordance and prognosis.

Methods: Consecutive MI patients [n = 712, 61% male; age 64.6 ± 12.3 years] undergoing coronary angiography were classified according to the presence of atherothrombosis and identifiable triggers. Association of angiographic and clinical MI type criteria with adverse outcomes (Time follow-up was 1.5 years) was evaluated. Predictive ability of GRACE risk score for all-cause mortality was then assessed.

Results: Atherothrombosis and clinical triggers were identified in 397 (55.6%) and 324 (45.5%) subjects, respectively. Only 247 (34.7%) patients had "true" T1MI (atherothrombosis+ / triggers-); 174 (24.4%) were diagnosed with "true" T2MI (atherothrombosis- / triggers+), while 291 (40.9%) had discordant clinical and angiographic characteristics. All-cause mortality in T2MI (20.1%) patients was higher than in T1MI (9.3%), P = 0.002. Presence of triggers [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.6, P < 0.0001] but not atherothrombosis [OR 0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-1.3, P = 0.26] was associated with worse prognosis. GRACE score is a better predictor of death in T1MI vs. T2MI: area under curve 0.893 (95% CI 0.830-0.956) vs 0.748 (95% CI 0.652-0.843), P = 0.013.

Conclusion: Angiographic and clinical definitions of MI type are discordant in a substantial proportion of patients. Clinical triggers are associated with all-cause mortality. Predictive performance of GRACE score is worse in T2MI patients.

Background: There is a lack of robust data evaluating outcomes of enoxaparin "bridge" therapy in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare HVAD recipients that received therapeutic enoxaparin as "bridge" therapy to describe bleeding and thrombotic events and compare outcomes between devices. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding within 30 days of "bridge" episode. Major bleeding was defined by INTERMACS criteria.

Results: We evaluated 257 "bridge" episodes in 54 patients, 35 with a HM II device and 19 with an HVAD device that underwent 176 and 81 bridging episodes, respectively. The median INR prior to "bridge" was lower in the HM II group compared to the HVAD group (1.5 vs 1.7, P < .01), however, there was no difference in the median duration of "bridge" therapy (7 vs 7 days, P = .42). There were a total of 30 (12%) bleeding episodes, with the majority in the HM II group vs HVAD (26 [15%] vs 4 [5%], P = .02). We observed 3 (1%) thromboembolic events in 2 (4%) patients with an HVAD device. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a HM II device was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of bleeding.

Conclusion: We found the use of enoxaparin "bridge" therapy to be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding in patients with a HM II device compared with an HVAD device. Assessment of device- and patient-specific factors should be evaluated to minimize bleeding events.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic and complex metabolic disorder and also an important cause of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD). Patients with type 2 DM (T2DM) and obesity show a greater propensity for visceral fat deposition (and excessive fat deposits elsewhere) and the link between adiposity and CVD risk is greater for visceral than for subcutaneous (SC) adipose tissue (AT). There is growing evidence that epicardial AT (EAT) and pericardial AT (PAT) play a role in the development of DM-related atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial dysfunction, and heart failure (HF). In this review, we will highlight the importance of PAT and EAT in patients with DM. We also consider therapeutic interventions that could have a beneficial effect in terms of reducing the amount of AT and thus CV risk. EAT is biologically active and a likely determinant of CV morbidity and mortality in patients with DM, given its anatomical characteristics and proinflammatory secretory pattern. Consequently, modification of EAT/PAT may become a therapeutic target to reduce the CV burden. In patients with DM, a low calorie diet, exercise, antidiabetics and statins may change the quantity of EAT, PAT or both, alter the secretory pattern of EAT, improve the metabolic profile, and reduce inflammation. However, well-designed studies are needed to clearly define CV benefits and a therapeutic approach to EAT/PAT in patients with DM.

Clinical guidelines suggest the combination of 2 drugs as a strategy to treat hypertension. However, some antihypertensive combinations have been shown to be ineffective. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether differences exist between the results of monotherapy and combination therapy by temporal monitoring of the responses to angiotensin II and norepinephrine, which are vasoconstrictors involved in the development of hypertension. Thus, the purpose of this work was to determine the vascular reactivity to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) aortic rings after treatment with valsartan, lisinopril, nebivolol, nebivolol-lisinopril, and nebivolol-valsartan for different periods of time. In this study, male SHR and Wistar Kyoto normotensive (WKY) rats were divided into 7 groups treated for 1, 2, and 4 weeks: (1) WKY + vehicle, (2) SHR + vehicle; (3) SHR + nebivolol; (4) SHR + lisinopril; (5) SHR + valsartan; (6) SHR + nebivolol-lisinopril; and (7) SHR + nebivolol-valsartan. Blood pressure was measured by the tail-cuff method, and vascular reactivity was determined from the concentration-response curve to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in aortic rings. The results showed that the combined and individual treatments reduced mean blood pressure at all times evaluated. All treatments decreased vascular reactivity to angiotensin II; however, in the case of lisinopril and nebivolol-lisinopril, the effect observed was significant up to 2 weeks. All treatments decreased the reactivity to norepinephrine up to week 4. These results show a time-dependent difference in vascular reactivity between the pharmacological treatments, with nebivolol-valsartan and nebivolol-lisinopril being both effective combinations. Additionally, the results suggest crosstalk between the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems to reduce blood pressure and to improve treatment efficacy.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic and progressive disorder characterized by vascular remodeling of the small pulmonary arteries, resulting in elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and ultimately, right ventricular failure. Expanded understanding of PAH pathophysiology as it pertains to the nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin (prostaglandin I₂) (PGI₂) and endothelin-1 pathways has led to recent advancements in targeted drug development and substantial improvements in morbidity and mortality. There are currently several classes of drugs available to target these pathways including phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i), soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators, prostacyclin class agents and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). Combination therapy in PAH, either upfront or sequentially, has become a widely adopted treatment strategy, allowing for simultaneous targeting of more than one of these signaling pathways implicated in disease progression. Much of the current treatment landscape has focused on initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil, an ERA and PDE5I respectively, following results of the AMBITION study demonstrating combination to be superior to either agent alone as upfront therapy. Consequently, clinicians often consider combination therapy with other drugs and drug classes, as deemed clinically appropriate, for patients with PAH. An alternative regimen that targets the NO and PGI₂ pathways has been adopted by some clinicians as an effective and sometimes preferred therapeutic combination for PAH. Although there is a paucity of prospective data, preclinical data and results from secondary data analysis of clinical studies targeting these pathways may provide novel insights into this alternative combination as a reasonable, and sometimes preferred, alternative approach to combination therapy in PAH. This review of preclinical and clinical data will discuss the current understanding of combination therapy that simultaneously targets the NO and PGI₂ signaling pathways, highlighting the clinical advantages and theoretical biochemical interplay of these agents.

Objectives: The main aim of this review was to summarize current evidence on approved and emerging non-statin lipid-lowering therapies.

Methods and materials: Recent literature on U.S. FDA approved non-statin lipid-lowering therapies and evolving lipid-lowering drugs currently under development was reviewed.

Results and discussion: In the past 20 years, the emergence of non-statin cholesterol-lowering drugs has changed the landscape of dyslipidemia management. Food and Drug Administration approval of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies such as ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (evolocumab, alirocumab), bempedoic acid and combination of bempedoic acid and ezetimibe, evinacumab and other triglyceride-lowering agents (eg, icosapent ethyl) has emerged. The European Commission has also recently approved inclisiran for treatment of hypercholesterolemia and mixed hypercholesterolemia even though FDA has put the approval of this drug on hold. Recent guidelines have incorporated PCSK9 inhibitors to treat patients with primary hyperlipidemia and patients with very high-risk ASCVD, who could not achieve adequate lipid-lowering with combination therapy of maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe. Icosapent ethyl use as an adjunct therapy to statins is also recommended to reduce the risk of ASCVD in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

Conclusion: Despite cost limitations, the uptake of PCSK9 inhibitors is increasing. Approval of bempedoic acid alone or in combination with ezetimibe has provided additional oral lipid-lowering drug alternatives to ezetimibe. Various lipid-lowering drug targets are under investigation.

Introduction: Recent evidence suggests that transcriptional reprogramming is involved in the pathogenesis of cardiac remodeling (cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis) and the development of heart failure. 5-Azacytidine (5aza), an inhibitor of DNA methylation approved for hematological malignancies, has previously demonstrated beneficial effects on cardiac remodeling in hypertension. The aim of our work was to investigate whether pressure overload is associated with alterations in DNA methylation and if intervention with low-dose 5aza can attenuate the associated pathological changes.

Methods and results: C57Bl6/J mice underwent surgical constriction of the aortic arch for 8 weeks. Mice began treatment 4 weeks post-surgery with either vehicle or 5aza (5 mg/kg). Cardiac structure and function was examined in vivo using echocardiography followed by post mortem histological assessment of hypertrophy and fibrosis. Global DNA methylation was examined by immunostaining for 5-methylcytosine (5MeC) and assessment of DNA methyltransferase expression. The results highlighted that pressure overload-induced pathological cardiac remodeling is associated with increased DNA methylation (elevated cardiac 5MeC positivity and Dnmt1 expression). Administration of 5aza attenuated pathological remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. These beneficial changes were mirrored by a treatment-related reduction in global 5MeC levels and expression of Dnmt1 and Dnmt3B in the heart.

Conclusion: DNA methylation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling. Therapeutic intervention with 5aza, at a dose 5 times lower than clinically given for oncology treatment, attenuated myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis. Our work supports the rationale for its potential use in cardiac pathologies associated with aberrant cardiac wound healing.

Introduction: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are widely prescribed medications. A recent British study reported a 14% increased risk of lung cancer with ACEI versus angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) prescriptions, and risk increased with longer use. We sought to validate this observation.

Methods: We searched the Intermountain Enterprise Data Warehouse from 1996 to 2018 for patients newly treated with an ACEI or an ARB and with ≥1 year's follow-up or to incident lung cancer or death. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for lung cancer and for lung cancer or all-cause mortality were calculated for ACEIs compared to ARBs.

Results: A total of 187,060 patients met entry criteria (age 60.2 ± 15.1 y; 51% women). During a mean of 7.1 years follow-up (max: 20.0 years), 3,039 lung cancers and 43,505 deaths occurred. Absolute lung cancer rates were 2.16 and 2.31 per 1000 patient-years in the ARB and ACEI groups, respectively. The HR of lung cancer was modestly increased with ACEIs (unadjusted HR = 1.11, CI: 1.02, 1.22, P = .014; adjusted HR = 1.18, CI: 1.06, 1.31, P = .002; number needed to harm [NNH] 6,667). Rates of the composite of lung cancer or death over time also favored ARBs. Lung cancer event curves separated gradually over longitudinal follow-up beginning at 10-12 years.

Conclusions: We noted a small long-term increase in lung cancer risk with ACEIs compared with ARBs. Separation of survival curves was delayed until 10-12 years after treatment initiation. Although the observed increases in lung cancer risk are small, implications are potentially important because of the broad use of ACEIs. Thus, additional work to validate these findings is needed.

Background: Nucleolin has multiple functions within cell survival and proliferation pathways. Our previous studies have revealed that nucleolin can significantly reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by promoting myocardial angiogenesis and reducing myocardial apoptosis. In this study, we attempted to determine the role of nucleolin in myocardial infarction (MI) injury recovery and the underlying mechanism.

Methods: Male BALB/c mice aged 6-8 weeks were used to set up MI models by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery. Nucleolin expression in the heart was downregulated by intramyocardial injection of a lentiviral vector expressing nucleolin-specific small interfering RNA. Macrophage infiltration and polarization were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence. Cytokines were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results: Nucleolin expression in myocardium after MI induction decreased a lot at early phase and elevated at late phase. Nucleolin knockdown impaired heart systolic and diastolic functions and decreased the survival rate after MI. Macrophage infiltration increased in the myocardium after MI. Most macrophages belonged to the M1 phenotype at early phase (2 days) and the M2 phenotype increased greatly at late phase after MI. Nucleolin knockdown in the myocardium led to a decrease in M2 macrophage polarization with no effect on macrophage infiltration after MI. Furthermore, Notch3 and STAT6, key regulators of M2 macrophage polarization, were upregulated by nucleolin in RAW 264.7 macrophages.

Conclusions: Lack of nucleolin impaired heart function during recovery after MI by reducing M2 macrophage polarization. This finding probably points to a new therapeutic option for ischemic heart disease.