{"title":"CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE IN MENTAL HEALTH STUDIES","authors":"Volkan Avşar, A. Avsar","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.88460","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.88460","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78789899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"METACOGNITIVE ASSESSMENT OF OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSIONS OF THE THOUGHT FUSION INSTRUMENT, BELIEFS ABOUT RITUALS INVENTORY AND STOP SIGNALS QUESTIONNAIRE","authors":"İlker Güneysu, S. Batmaz, E. Aslan, Seda Güneysu","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.103888","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.103888","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"18 3 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82817373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Relationship Between Burnout and Psychological Flexibility Processes in Healthcare Professionals","authors":"H. Karatepe, R. Elbay","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.132931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.132931","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"210 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85510860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Investigation of the Relationship between Suicide Cognitions, Impulsivity and Meaning of Life","authors":"U. Baltacı, Z. Traş, M. Ak, Şahin Kesici","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.94848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.94848","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74906429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Panic disorder (PD) and Agoraphobia (AG) exhibit both similar and distinct cognitive features. The aim of this study was to compare patients with PD, AG and panic disorder with agoraphobia (PBA) in terms of agoraphobic cognitions, body sensations, catastrophic cognitions, and meta-cognitions. 64 PDA, 52 AG, and 36 PD patients were included in the study. The Structural Clinical Interview for Axis-I (SCID-I), Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ), Body Sensations Questionnaire (BSQ), Catastrophic Cognitions Questionnaire (CCQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire (MCQ) were administered to the participants. Chi-square test and Kruskal Wallis analysis were used to compare sociodemographic data and scale scores between the three groups. The results showed that ACQ total scores of the PDA group were significantly higher compared to the other groups. There were no statistically significant differences between PD, AG and PDA groups in terms of BSQ, CCQ, and MCQ total scores. BDI total scores of PD group were significantly lower than AG and PDA groups. BAI total scores of PDA group were significantly higher compared to the other groups. Studies on cognitive features among patients with PD, AG or PDA will contribute to cognitive behavioral models and treatment process of these disorders.
{"title":"Agorafobinin eslik ettigi ve etmedigi panik bozukluk ile agorafobinin bilissel ozellikler acisindan karsilastirilmasi","authors":"R. Akçakaya, Bengü Yücens","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.73730","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.73730","url":null,"abstract":"Panic disorder (PD) and Agoraphobia (AG) exhibit both similar and distinct cognitive features. The aim of this study was to compare patients with PD, AG and panic disorder with agoraphobia (PBA) in terms of agoraphobic cognitions, body sensations, catastrophic cognitions, and meta-cognitions. 64 PDA, 52 AG, and 36 PD patients were included in the study. The Structural Clinical Interview for Axis-I (SCID-I), Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ), Body Sensations Questionnaire (BSQ), Catastrophic Cognitions Questionnaire (CCQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire (MCQ) were administered to the participants. Chi-square test and Kruskal Wallis analysis were used to compare sociodemographic data and scale scores between the three groups. The results showed that ACQ total scores of the PDA group were significantly higher compared to the other groups. There were no statistically significant differences between PD, AG and PDA groups in terms of BSQ, CCQ, and MCQ total scores. BDI total scores of PD group were significantly lower than AG and PDA groups. BAI total scores of PDA group were significantly higher compared to the other groups. Studies on cognitive features among patients with PD, AG or PDA will contribute to cognitive behavioral models and treatment process of these disorders.","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"16 6 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82931525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Effect of Perceived Psychological Control On The Automatic Thoughts of Children","authors":"Emel Güler, R. Dönmez","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.111554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.111554","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"51 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88882726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Development of Maladaptive Thinking Styles Scale","authors":"H. Koç, C. Arslan","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.68769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.68769","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"88 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78969337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Despite the shown effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies (CBT) for chronic pain, it is not clear which CBT approach is more effective and which components or combinations of CBT account for a better treatment outcome. In this regard, this study aimed to systematically review the studies investigating the effectiveness of all forms of CBT for the treatment of individuals with chronic pain. For this purpose, randomised controlled clinical trials on adults with chronic pain published between the years of 2006 and 2016 have been searched in the Google Scholar, Web of Science and EBSCO databases by using the keywords chronic pain, pain disorders, cognitive behavioural therapy or treatment. Following database search, 24 trials were identified based on the eligibility criteria. Primary outcomes were demonstrated to be pain intensity, disability, self-efficacy, and pain control, whereas secondary outcomes were related to emotional difficulties. In terms of comparative effectiveness, findings revealed that all forms of CBT are significantly more effective than physical treatments, particularly for emotional problems. However, no statistically significant differences were found for the comparison of traditional CBT and mindfulness and acceptance-based treatments. Findings further underlined that some forms of CBT appeared to produce greater improvements in some of the outcome measures. Findings of this review emphasise that what is in fact responsible for the positive outcome while delivering CBT for chronic pain is still not clear. Thus, future research should focus on identifying specific components and underlying mechanisms of CBT in order to maximize treatment outcome.
尽管认知行为疗法(CBT)对慢性疼痛有疗效，但目前尚不清楚哪种CBT方法更有效，以及CBT的哪些成分或组合能带来更好的治疗结果。在这方面，本研究旨在系统地回顾调查所有形式的CBT治疗慢性疼痛个体的有效性的研究。为此，我们使用关键词“慢性疼痛”、“疼痛障碍”、“认知行为疗法”或“治疗”，在Google Scholar、Web of Science和EBSCO数据库中检索了2006年至2016年间发表的针对成人慢性疼痛的随机对照临床试验。在数据库检索之后，根据入选标准确定了24项试验。主要结局是疼痛强度、残疾、自我效能和疼痛控制，而次要结局与情绪困难有关。就比较效果而言，研究结果显示，所有形式的CBT都明显比物理治疗更有效，尤其是对情绪问题。然而，传统CBT与正念和接受治疗的比较没有统计学上的显著差异。研究结果进一步强调，某些形式的CBT似乎在某些结果测量方面产生了更大的改善。本综述的发现强调，在对慢性疼痛进行CBT治疗时，究竟是什么导致了积极的结果，目前尚不清楚。因此，未来的研究应侧重于识别CBT的具体组成部分和潜在机制，以最大限度地提高治疗效果。
{"title":"Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain","authors":"B. İnce","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.64324","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.64324","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the shown effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies (CBT) for chronic pain, it is not clear which CBT approach is more effective and which components or combinations of CBT account for a better treatment outcome. In this regard, this study aimed to systematically review the studies investigating the effectiveness of all forms of CBT for the treatment of individuals with chronic pain. For this purpose, randomised controlled clinical trials on adults with chronic pain published between the years of 2006 and 2016 have been searched in the Google Scholar, Web of Science and EBSCO databases by using the keywords chronic pain, pain disorders, cognitive behavioural therapy or treatment. Following database search, 24 trials were identified based on the eligibility criteria. Primary outcomes were demonstrated to be pain intensity, disability, self-efficacy, and pain control, whereas secondary outcomes were related to emotional difficulties. In terms of comparative effectiveness, findings revealed that all forms of CBT are significantly more effective than physical treatments, particularly for emotional problems. However, no statistically significant differences were found for the comparison of traditional CBT and mindfulness and acceptance-based treatments. Findings further underlined that some forms of CBT appeared to produce greater improvements in some of the outcome measures. Findings of this review emphasise that what is in fact responsible for the positive outcome while delivering CBT for chronic pain is still not clear. Thus, future research should focus on identifying specific components and underlying mechanisms of CBT in order to maximize treatment outcome.","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"248-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90212510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Ulusoy, G. Cantürk, Zülal Çelik, S. Mutlu, Canan Kaya, M. Terzioğlu, K. F. Yavuz
{"title":"THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COPING STYLES, DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOM LEVELS AND CAREGIVER BURDEN IN CAREGIVERS OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITY","authors":"S. Ulusoy, G. Cantürk, Zülal Çelik, S. Mutlu, Canan Kaya, M. Terzioğlu, K. F. Yavuz","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.37565","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.37565","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83147257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H. Y. Eser, Merve Yalçinay Inan, Mehmet Ker, C. Kilciksiz, Sezen Yilmaz, N. Dincer, O. Kilic, A. Ercan, Ö. Aydemir
Anhedonia is a core feature of many psychiatric disorders and its reliable evaluation is needed for the dimensional understanding of psychiatric disorders. Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is one of the most widely used scale to assess anhedonia. Here, we aimed to search the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of SHAPS. Translation of the original scale was completed in a two-step procedure. 188 healthy controls, 56 patients with a depressive disorder (F32-F34, excluding F34.0 cyclothymic disorder, according to ICD-10), and 52 patients with anxiety, stress-related or somatoform disorder diagnoses (F40-49 diagnosis according to ICD-10) were recruited, and evaluated with the Turkish version of SHAPS, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R). For the Turkish version of SHAPS, Cronbachs alpha coefficient was found 0.87. The item-total item correlation indices ranged from 0.39 to 0.64. Principal components analysis extracted two factors and explained 46.57 % of total variance. The most significant correlation of SHAPS was found with BDI scores. SHAPS weakly correlated with somatization, interpersonal sensitivity and depression sub-scales of SCL-90-R, but not with BAI or other sub-scales of SCL-90-R. Depressive group had significantly higher SHAPS scores compared to controls and anxious group. Anxious group and control group were not significantly different for SHAPS scores. The current study shows that the Turkish version of the SHAPS has good psychometric properties. SHAPS scores may correlate with depression, somatization, and interpersonal sensitivity scores, and it may help to differentiate depressive patients from anxious patients and controls.
快感缺乏是许多精神疾病的核心特征，其可靠的评估是对精神疾病维度理解的必要条件。snith - hamilton快乐量表(SHAPS)是目前应用最广泛的快感缺乏症量表之一。在这里，我们的目的是搜索土耳其版SHAPS的效度和信度。原始比例尺的翻译分两步完成。我们招募了188名健康对照，56名患有抑郁症的患者(根据ICD-10, F32-F34，不包括F34.0周期胸痛障碍)，52名诊断为焦虑、压力相关或躯体形式障碍的患者(根据ICD-10，诊断为F40-49)，并使用土耳其版SHAPS、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和症状检查表-90- r (SCL-90-R)进行评估。对于土耳其版的SHAPS, Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.87。项目-总项目相关指数在0.39 ~ 0.64之间。主成分分析提取了两个因子，解释了46.57%的总方差。SHAPS与BDI评分的相关性最显著。SHAPS与SCL-90-R的躯体化、人际敏感和抑郁量表呈弱相关，而与BAI和其他SCL-90-R量表无显著相关。抑郁组的SHAPS评分明显高于对照组和焦虑组。焦虑组与对照组的SHAPS评分差异无统计学意义。目前的研究表明，土耳其版本的SHAPS具有良好的心理测量特性。SHAPS评分可能与抑郁、躯体化和人际敏感性评分相关，并可能有助于区分抑郁患者与焦虑患者和对照组。
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale","authors":"H. Y. Eser, Merve Yalçinay Inan, Mehmet Ker, C. Kilciksiz, Sezen Yilmaz, N. Dincer, O. Kilic, A. Ercan, Ö. Aydemir","doi":"10.5455/jcbpr.67308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcbpr.67308","url":null,"abstract":"Anhedonia is a core feature of many psychiatric disorders and its reliable evaluation is needed for the dimensional understanding of psychiatric disorders. Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is one of the most widely used scale to assess anhedonia. Here, we aimed to search the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of SHAPS. Translation of the original scale was completed in a two-step procedure. 188 healthy controls, 56 patients with a depressive disorder (F32-F34, excluding F34.0 cyclothymic disorder, according to ICD-10), and 52 patients with anxiety, stress-related or somatoform disorder diagnoses (F40-49 diagnosis according to ICD-10) were recruited, and evaluated with the Turkish version of SHAPS, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R). For the Turkish version of SHAPS, Cronbachs alpha coefficient was found 0.87. The item-total item correlation indices ranged from 0.39 to 0.64. Principal components analysis extracted two factors and explained 46.57 % of total variance. The most significant correlation of SHAPS was found with BDI scores. SHAPS weakly correlated with somatization, interpersonal sensitivity and depression sub-scales of SCL-90-R, but not with BAI or other sub-scales of SCL-90-R. Depressive group had significantly higher SHAPS scores compared to controls and anxious group. Anxious group and control group were not significantly different for SHAPS scores. The current study shows that the Turkish version of the SHAPS has good psychometric properties. SHAPS scores may correlate with depression, somatization, and interpersonal sensitivity scores, and it may help to differentiate depressive patients from anxious patients and controls.","PeriodicalId":15388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84023080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：