Journal of Clinical Apheresis最新文献

Scleromyxedema is a rare skin mucinosis often associated with systemic involvement and monoclonal gammopathy (MG). No formal recommendation for management with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been published due to rarity. This paper reports a 42-year-old male with progressive scleromyxedema. The patient was treated with glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy, but the disease progressed. Ultimately, the patient was referred for TPE, which resulted in decreased skin stiffness, improved extremity range of motion, and decreased visibility of papules on the hands. The patient's debilitating dysphagia gradually improved. A review of the literature focusing on clinical response identified five cases of scleromyxedema patients treated with TPE. Three of the five cases reported significant improvement in cutaneous symptoms and range of motion for at least 12 months. Overall, we propose that TPE should be considered an effective supportive treatment for symptomatic relief in severe or refractory scleromyxedema.

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a disorder characterized by hypogammaglobulinemia resulting in recurrent infections. While autoimmune disorders are common in patients with CVID, no association has been reported between CVID and immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), a disorder most often caused by autoantibodies that compromise the activity of the enzyme ADAMTS13. Reduced ADAMTS13 activity results in the accumulation of large von Willebrand factor multimers that can consume platelets and cause microvascular thrombosis and organ injury, ultimately resulting in mortality in most cases of untreated iTTP. Here, we report a 12-year-old male with CVID who developed iTTP, underwent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), and subsequently recovered. We conducted a systematic review for other cases of CVID co-occurring with iTTP and present additional cases of this rare presentation. We highlight the importance of prompt recognition of iTTP in a patient with CVID and timely initiation of TPE.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung transplantation has been associated with poor long-term clinical course and is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Appropriate management of AMR is necessary to improve graft survival in lung transplant recipients. There is currently no standardized approach to the treatment of lung AMR, and practices vary by institution. We sought to examine the efficacy of a standardized protocol of plasma exchange (PLEX) and IVIG in decreasing donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and improving AMR in lung transplant recipients. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all lung transplant recipients who completed a course of PLEX per UT Southwestern AMR protocol between January 2012 and December 2019 for diagnosis of AMR. Data were collected on the patient clinical course, treatment regimen, pre-PLEX DSA, post-PLEX DSA, follow-up (> 1-month post-PLEX) DSA, and pre-and post-PLEX biopsy, when available. Of 527 patients who underwent lung transplantation during the study period, 56 (11%) received an acute course of PLEX every other day per protocol for AMR of lung transplant. Forty (71%) of 56 patients had one episode of AMR requiring PLEX; 16 patients (29%) had repeat episodes of AMR within 6 weeks to 47 months of the first episode. Most patients showed improvement in AMR on biopsy (69%) and a decline in DSA (68%). Our data suggest that treatment with combined PLEX and IVIG protocol appears effective for treating lung AMR.

Plasma plays a crucial role in maintaining health through regulating coagulation and inflammation. Both are essential to respond to homeostatic threats such as traumatic injury or microbial infection; however, left unchecked, they can themselves cause damage. A well-functioning plasma regulatory milieu controls the location, intensity, and duration of the response to injury or infection. In contrast, plasma failure can be conceptualized as a state in which these mechanisms are overwhelmed and unable to constrain coagulation and inflammation appropriately. This dysregulated state causes widespread tissue damage and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Unlike plasma derangements caused by individual factors, plasma failure is characterized by a heterogeneous set of plasma component deficiencies and excesses. Targeted therapies such as factor replacement or recombinant antibodies are thus inadequate to restore plasma function. Therapeutic plasma exchange offers the unique ability to remove harmful factors and replete exhausted components, thereby reestablishing appropriate regulation of coagulation and inflammation.

Apheresis is performed worldwide for an increasing number of indications. The development of common data elements (CDE) for apheresis related areas may facilitate conduct of new research, enhance quality initiatives including benchmarking, and improve patient care. This report describes the systematic development of the Uniform Apheresis Case Report Form (UACRF) as part of the Apheresis in the United States (ApheresUS) program. A consensus panel of 17 diverse experts in apheresis, related specialties, and electronic case report form (eCRF), and database development was assembled. The panel met via online conferencing from November 17, 2020 to December 1, 2021. A draft document was posted online for public comment from October 11, 2021 to November 10, 2021. Feedback was collected using an online survey tool. The consensus panel revised the UACRF. This version was converted to an eCRF with additional changes made to improve usability in this format. The final version of the UACRF was created on August 24, 2023. The UACRF contains 16 modules: procedure and subject eligibility, patient demographics, general procedure information, laboratory parameters, vascular access, common procedure elements, eight procedure specific modules (mononuclear cell collection and seven therapeutic modalities), outcomes, and site information. A total of 137 data elements were created, including 57 with one or more subelements. The UACRF is the first systematic attempt to develop CDE for therapeutic apheresis and white blood cell collections. Further validation of the UACRF is necessary to confirm the tool's ability to collect the relevant data elements and determine the usability of the form.

Evidence describing the use of plerixafor in the off-label population of relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors (GCT) is limited. We aim to describe the effect of rescue versus preemptive plerixafor use on apheresis collection days, collection yields, and cost. We retrospectively collected data on 77 consecutive patients (at least 15 years of age) with GCT who underwent peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection for autologous stem cell transplant between January 1, 2020 and May 1, 2022. Depending on insurance approval, plerixafor was given either as “rescue” (after a first apheresis collection of < 5 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg) or as “preemptive” on Day 4 of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prior to the first apheresis collection, if the Day 4 peripheral blood CD34+ count was < 40 cells/μL. A total of 66% of patients who received preemptive plerixafor completed collection in 1 day, similar to good mobilizers who only needed G-CSF (71%, p = 0.366). In contrast, all poor mobilizers in the rescue group required at least 2 days of collection and had lower CD34+ cell yields than the preemptive group (7.15 vs. 9.81 × 10⁶/kg, p = 0.0055). A cost analysis revealed that preemptive plerixafor may save approximately $7000 per patient compared with a rescue approach. Preemptive plerixafor in GCT patients undergoing PBSC collection allows relatively poor mobilizers to collect in fewer days and with lower overall cost. Fewer apheresis procedures result in less risk to the patient, increased patient satisfaction, and the ability to schedule more patients within the constraints of staffing.