Journal of Clinical Apheresis最新文献

Background

Stem cell apheresis in the context of autologous stem cell transplantation requires an accurate cluster of differentiantion 34 (CD34⁺) count determined by flow cytometry as the current gold standard. Since flow cytometry is a personnel and time-intensive diagnostic tool, automated stem cell enumeration may provide a promising alternative. Hence, this study aimed to compare automated hematopoietic progenitor enumeration carried out on a Sysmex XN-20 module compared with conventional flow cytometric measurements.

Methods

One hundred forty-three blood samples from 41 patients were included in this study. Correlation between the two methods was calculated over all samples, depending on leukocyte count and diagnosis.

Results

Overall, we found a high degree of correlation (r = 0.884). Furthermore, correlation was not impaired by elevated leukocyte counts (>10 000/μL, r = 0.860 vs <10 000/μL, r = 0.849; >20 000/μL, r = 0.843 vs <20 000/μL, r = 0.875). However, correlation was significantly impaired in patients with multiple myeloma (multiple myeloma r = 0.840 vs nonmyeloma r = 0.934).

Summary

Stem cell measurement carried out on the Sysmex XN-20 module provides a significant correlation with flow cytometry and might be implemented in clinical practice. In clinical decision-making, there was discrepancy of under 15% of cases. In multiple myeloma patients, XN-20 should be used with caution.

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic affected healthcare delivery across all specialties including apheresis. To describe the changes in apheresis service practices that occurred during the pandemic, the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Medicine Attending Physician Subcommittee conducted a survey study.

Study Design and Methods

A 32-question survey was designed and distributed to 400 ASFA physician members on September 7, 2022. Attending physicians responded to questions about whether and how apheresis service practices changed during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the time period prior to the pandemic in terms of: (1) procedure types and volumes, (2) patient consultation workflow, and (3) the use of telemedicine. Descriptive analyses were reported as number and frequency of responses.

Results

The survey response rate was 13.8% (55/400). Of these respondents, 96.4% (53/55) were attending physicians. The majority of respondents (42/53, 79.2%) indicated that the types of procedures performed during COVID-19 compared to pre-pandemic did not change. Most frequently for apheresis procedure volume, respondents reported: no change in their monthly inpatient volume (21/47, 44.7%) and a decrease in their monthly outpatient volume (28/46, 60.9%). Prior to COVID-19, 75.0% (30/40) of respondents performed consultations at bedside for inpatients and 67.4% (29/43) performed consultations at bedside for outpatients. Bedside consultations decreased in both settings during the pandemic but were still most frequently performed by attending physicians. At the same time, the use of telemedicine increased for 15.4% of survey respondents during COVID-19.

Conclusion

Some, but not all, respondents observed or made changes to their apheresis service during the COVID-19 pandemic. A subset of changes, such as increased utilization of telemedicine, may persist.

Introduction

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a heterogeneous group of autoantibody-mediated disorders targeting the brain parenchyma. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), one of several first-line therapies for AE, is often initiated when AE is suspected, albeit prior to an established diagnosis. We sought to characterize the role of TPE in the treatment of suspected AE.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective analysis was performed of adults (≥18 years) who underwent at least one TPE procedure for “suspected AE.” The following parameters were extracted and evaluated descriptively: clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment course, TPE-related adverse events, outcomes (e.g., modified Rankin scale [mRS]), and diagnosis once investigation was complete.

Results

A total of 37 patients (median age 56 years, range 28–77 years, 62.2% male) were evaluated. Autoimmune antibody testing was positive in serum for 43.2% (n = 16) and cerebrospinal fluid for 29.7% (n = 11).

Patients underwent a median of five TPE procedures (range 3–16), with 97.3% (n = 36) via a central line and 21.6% (n = 8) requiring at least one unit of plasma as replacement fluid. Fifteen patients (40.5%) experienced at least one TPE-related adverse event. Compared with mRS at admission, the mRS at discharge was improved in 21.6% (n = 8), unchanged in 59.5% (n = 22), or worse in 18.9% (n = 7). Final diagnosis of AE was determined to be definite in 48.6% (n = 18), probable in 8.1% (n = 3) and possible in 27.0% (n = 10). Six (16.2%) patients were ultimately determined to have an alternate etiology.

Conclusion

Empiric TPE for suspected AE is generally well-tolerated. However, its efficacy remains uncertain in the absence of controlled trials, particularly in the setting of seronegative disease.

Background

Acute liver failure (ALF) following yellow phosphorous (YP) ingestion is similar to acetaminophen-induced ALF and it has become a public concern in our region. This study assessed low volume therapeutic plasma exchange (LV-TPE) efficacy in improving the transplant free survival in YP poisoning.

Methods

Adult patients with toxicology reports of YP and ALF requiring critical care were included in the study. LV-TPE was planned for three consecutive days and three more if required. Performed 1.3 to 1.5 plasma volume replacing with 0.9% normal saline, 5% human albumin solution, and fresh frozen plasma based on ASFA 2019 criteria. MELD score, laboratory parameters, LV-TPE details were captured. The study end point was clinical outcome of the patients.

Results

Among 36 patients, 19 underwent LV-TPE and 17 opted out of LV-TPE and they were included as a control arm. The MELD score was 32.64 ± 8.05 and 37.83 ± 9.37 in both groups. There were 13 survivors in LV-TPE group leading to a 68.42% reduction in mortality. The coagulation and biochemical parameters showed a significant percentage change after LV-TPE. Refractory shock, delay in initiating procedure and acidosis were independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusion

A well-timed LV-TPE improves the survival of patients with ALF due to YP poisoning.