Journal of Clinical Pathology最新文献

Aims and methods: Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is currently considered to be classified into three clinical subtypes, including idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy (IPL), thrombocytopaenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis/renal dysfunction, organomegaly (TAFRO) and not otherwise specified (NOS). Among the three, iMCD-IPL closely mimics IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). In diagnosing IgG4-RD, it is sometimes challenging to distinguish iMCD-IPL patients that also meet the histological diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD. In this study, we focused on the number of IgG4-positive cells in the lymph nodes and analysed the relationship with laboratory findings to distinguish iMCD-IPL from IgG4-RD. Thirty-nine patients with iMCD-IPL and 22 patients with IgG4-RD were included.

Results: Among the cases considered to be iMCD-IPL, 33.3% (13/39) cases also met the histological diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD and serum IgG4 levels were not different between the two groups. However, the serum IgG4/IgG ratio was significantly higher in IgG4-RD, with a cut-off value of 19.0%. Additionally, a significant positive correlation between serum IgG levels and the number of IgG4-positive cells was observed in iMCD-IPL (p=0.001). The serum IgG cut-off value for distinguishing iMCD-IPL meeting histological criteria for IgG4-RD from other iMCD-IPL was 5381 mg/dL.

Conclusions: iMCD-IPL cases with high serum IgG levels (>5000 mg/dL) were likely to meet the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD because of the numerous IgG4-positive cells observed. A combination of clinical presentations, laboratory values including the serum IgG4/IgG ratios and histological analysis is crucial for diagnosis of IgG4-RD and iMCD-IPL.

Aims: Breast cancer (BC) during pregnancy (PrBC) and the postpartum period (PPBC) often exhibits more aggressive tumour characteristics and is associated with a poorer prognosis compared with age-matched nonpregnant patients with BC. The underlying mechanisms for this increased aggressiveness remain unresolved. Intratumoral hypoxia, a known adverse prognostic marker in nonpregnant BC, has not yet been studied in PrBC/PPBC. This is particularly intriguing due to the potential exposure to angiogenesis-stimulating factors during pregnancy, which may influence tumour behaviour.

Methods: Tumour tissues from 148 patients with PrBC and 45 patients with PPBC were used to create a tissue microarray (TMA), and clinical and outcome data were obtained. The TMAs were stained for hypoxia-associated protein markers: glucose transporter-1, carbonic anhydrase IX and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α.

Results: Of all 193 tumours, 152 (79%) expressed at least one of these proteins indicative of intratumoral hypoxia. The presence of intratumoral hypoxia was associated with a higher histological grade (83% grade III vs 63%) and frequent hormone receptor negativity (68% vs 39%). In a multivariable analysis, the presence of intratumoral hypoxia indicated a significantly worse prognosis (HR 2.532, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.7) for patients with PrBC and PPBC.

Conclusion: This unique study, the first in patients with PrBC and PPBC, showed that, despite their likely exposure to angiogenesis-stimulating factors, intratumoral hypoxia is frequent and affects 79% of patients. Importantly, patients with tumours overexpressing hypoxia markers have significantly worse survival. This suggests that hypoxia may be an important mechanism in carcinogenesis and clinical behaviour of PrBC and PPBC.

Aims: Research reporting checklists are itemised writing standards to improve transparency and facilitate reproducibility. Previous assessments of their recommendation or requirement have demonstrated improved checklist adherence across medical specialties and study designs. Here, we investigated the endorsement of reporting checklists within pathology, laboratory medicine and forensic science journals.

Methods: We queried Google Scholar Metrics and the Scopus CiteScore tool to identify top pathology and forensic medicine journals. Two authors independently assessed for the mention, recommendation or requirement or checklists-derived from the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency Of Health Research (EQUATOR) network-as well as study preregistration within each journal's aims and instructions for authors. Journal editors were contacted by one author every 3 weeks to confirm whether or not certain study designs would be considered for publication.

Results: Of the 88 journals evaluated, most did not mention or endorse the EQUATOR Network (73.9%) or International Committee of Medical Journal Editors reporting standards (51.1%). The most commonly reported checklists included Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (38.6%), Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (28.4%) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (25.0%). The CARE reporting checklist for case reports was required most often by five journals (5.7%). The final email response from journal editors and contacts was 9.1%.

Conclusions: Reporting checklists were suboptimally mentioned and rarely required. Even with many basic and diagnostic science reporting checklists and initiatives, endorsement remains low. We recommend that authors, reviewers and editors become familiar with relevant reporting checklists for their fields and publishing spaces to improve checklist visibility and adherence for scientific transparency, reproducibility and rigour.

Aims: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is beginning to be applied to cancer samples in the clinical setting. This ideally requires high-quality, minimally degraded DNA of high tumour cell content, while retaining sufficient tissue with excellent morphology for histopathological diagnosis and immunohistochemistry. The aim of this study was to investigate alternative ways of handling cancer samples to fulfil both diagnostic and molecular requirements.

Methods: Ex vivo biopsies were taken to investigate the feasibility of using cancer cells 'shaken' from the surface of a biopsy for WGS, while maintaining the tissue biopsy for histological diagnosis. WGS from the shaken cells was compared with the gold standard of a fresh-frozen (FF) biopsy. The procedure was piloted in the real-world setting for breast cancer samples.

Results: Cells shaken from ex vivo biopsies can yield DNA of sufficient quantity and quality for WGS, while having no discernible impact on quality of tissue morphology. WGS data showed good coverage, comparable variant calls and generally higher tumour content in shaken cell samples compared with the control FF samples. For real-world biopsies, DNA yields were lower, but WGS data were of excellent quality for the cases analysed.

Conclusions: Shaken biopsy sampling allows genomic sequencing from patients with cancer who may otherwise not receive a genome sequence due to limited sample availability. It represents a way of overcoming the logistics of obtaining and storing FF tissue making it a suitable technique for wider scale implementation in the clinical setting.

Aims: To study the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis (MGACA) of the breast.

Methods: Clinicopathological features of 13 cases of MGACA were analysed. All tumours were molecular subtype by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of AR, CD8, FOXC1 and DCLK1 expression. Next-generation sequencing including 511 genes was analysed.

Results: All tumours showed a histological spectrum ranging from microglandular adenosis (MGA) to atypical MGA (AMGA), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and MGACA. Invasive components in 10 of 13 tumours were invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST), 3 were metaplastic carcinoma with mesenchymal differentiation (including two cases of matrix-producing carcinoma) mixed with NST. All lesion-associated epithelial cells were triple negative (TNBC) and positive for S-100. Reticulin staining showed the presence of basement membrane in MGA, AMGA and DCIS, and its absence in invasive carcinoma. According to IHC-based TNBC molecular subtyping, 10 tumours were basal-like immune-suppressed (BLIS), 2 were luminal androgen receptor and 1 was immunomodulatory. 10 patients had gene mutations. Pathogenic germline mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were detected in four tumours (30.7%) and one tumour (7.7%). Somatic mutation rate of the TP53 gene was 69.2%. Amplification rates of MYC, FGFR2, JAK2 and MCL1 genes in our cohort were 46.2%, 15.4%, 15.4% and 7.7%, respectively.

Conclusion: MGACA is a rare breast carcinoma, with distinct morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features. Most MGACA were BLIS molecular subtype of TNBC. TP53 and BRCA1 gene mutation and MYC gene amplification were the most common genetic changes in MGACA.

Background: Deep learning (DL) models are effective pre-screening tools for detecting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). These models have been trained and validated on large cohorts from the Northern Hemisphere, without representation of African samples. We sought to determine the performance of a DL model in an ethnically heterogeneous cohort of patients from South Africa.

Methods: Our cohort comprised 197 CRC resection specimens, with scanned whole slide images tessellated and inputted into a transformer-based DL model trained on large international cohorts. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity. The maximal Youden's J index was calculated to determine the optimal cut-off threshold for the model prediction score.

Results: Our model yielded an AUROC of 0.91 (±0.05). Using a prediction score threshold of 0.620 produced an overall sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI 73.3% to 92.9%) and a specificity of 82.4% (95% CI 75.5% to 87.7%). The false negative cases were predominantly left-sided (71.4%) and did not show the typical dMMR/microsatellite instability-high histological phenotype. Sensitivity was lower (50%-75%) in cases showing isolated PMS2 or MSH6 loss of staining. Calibrating the classification threshold to 0.470, the sensitivity was optimised to 95.6% (95% CI 86.3% to 98.9%) with a specificity of 69.6% (95% CI 61.8% to 76.4%). This would have resulted in excluding 103 cases (52.3%) from downstream immunohistochemical (IHC) or molecular testing.

Conclusions: Following appropriate region-specific calibration, we have shown that this model could be employed to accurately prescreen for dMMR in CRC, thereby reducing the burden of downstream IHC and molecular testing in a resource-limited setting.

Aims: Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) was recently approved for advanced stage or metastatic solid tumours with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemical (IHC) 3+ staining. Data on HER2 IHC testing and knowledge of genomic correlates in lung cancer are scarce. This study analyses genomic characteristics of HER2-expressing tumours and addresses issues with preanalytical variables for lung cancer specimens.

Methods: HER2 IHC staining was performed on selected archival cytology and surgical pathology lung cancer specimens for patients eligible for T-DXd therapy. Patient and tumour characteristics and next-generation sequencing (NGS) data were correlated with HER2 IHC results.

Results: 166 patients with thoracic tumour samples had HER2 expression assessed: 46% were IHC 0, 28% IHC 1+, 13% IHC 2+ and 13% IHC 3+. HER2 IHC scores were overall lower for cytology cell blocks as compared with surgical pathology specimens; 79% of cases with paired specimens had a decrease in their HER2 IHC score from their surgical specimen to their paired cytology specimen. Of specimens with HER2 IHC 3+ and NGS available, only 14% (3/21) had concomitant ERBB2 alterations. Among all specimens, ERBB2 point mutations were noted in 4% (4/110) and ERBB2 amplification in 3% (3/110). The majority of HER2 3+ cases with paired NGS (17/21, 81%) had non-ERBB2 genomic alterations, including: KRAS, TP53, and STK11 mutations.

Conclusions: HER2 IHC 3+ is seen in a small but clinically significant proportion of samples and is associated with a variety of co-occurring non-ERBB2 genomic alterations. Preanalytical variables including specimen fixation can significantly impact the assessment of HER2 expression via immunohistochemistry.