首页 > 最新文献

Journal of clinical lipidology最新文献

英文 中文
Addressing residual risk beyond statin therapy: New targets in the management of dyslipidaemias–A report from the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table 解决他汀类药物治疗之外的残余风险:血脂异常管理的新目标--欧洲心脏病学会心血管圆桌会议报告
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.07.001
François Mach MD, Frank L.J. Visseren MD, Nilo B. Cater MD, Nejoua Salhi MD, Jarkko Soronen MD, Kausik K. Ray MD, Victoria Delgado MD, J. Wouter Jukema MD, Ulrich Laufs MD, Jose-Luis Zamorano MD, Emilio Ros MD, Jogchum Plat MD, Akos Gabor Gesztes BPharm, Lale Tokgozoglu MD, Chris Packard MD, Peter Libby MD
Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the most common cause of death in Europe. Despite proven benefits, use of lipid-lowering therapy remains suboptimal. Treatment goals are often not achieved, even in patients at high risk with atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD).
在欧洲,心血管疾病是最常见的死亡原因。尽管降脂治疗的益处已得到证实,但其效果仍不理想。即使是患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的高风险患者,也往往达不到治疗目标。
{"title":"Addressing residual risk beyond statin therapy: New targets in the management of dyslipidaemias–A report from the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table","authors":"François Mach MD, Frank L.J. Visseren MD, Nilo B. Cater MD, Nejoua Salhi MD, Jarkko Soronen MD, Kausik K. Ray MD, Victoria Delgado MD, J. Wouter Jukema MD, Ulrich Laufs MD, Jose-Luis Zamorano MD, Emilio Ros MD, Jogchum Plat MD, Akos Gabor Gesztes BPharm, Lale Tokgozoglu MD, Chris Packard MD, Peter Libby MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the most common cause of death in Europe. Despite proven benefits, use of lipid-lowering therapy remains suboptimal. Treatment goals are often not achieved, even in patients at high risk with atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD).","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141611952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of lipids and lipid-lowering drugs with peripheral arterial disease: A Mendelian randomization study 血脂和降脂药与外周动脉疾病的关系:孟德尔随机研究
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.007
Mengjun Tao MD, Yuanxiang Zhang MD, Qi Li MD, Xuebing Feng PhD, Cheng Ping MD
It remains unclear whether lipid profiles and lipid-lowering medications are causally related to PAD. Explain whether there is a causal relationship between lipid status and lipid-lowering drugs and PAD. In this two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, we assessed the causal relationship between lipid traits, including high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), and LDL-associated genetic variants (), and the risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) using genetic variants associated with these lipid markers. The study analyzed data from 1,654,960 individuals derived from the Global Lipid Genetics Consortium and the UK Biobank, ensuring a robust and comprehensive genetic insight into the effects of lipid dysfunction on PAD. We found genetically predicted associations between HDL (: 0.83, 95% : 0.83-0.77), LDL-c (: 1.29, 95% : 1.12-1.50), TC (: 1.14, 95% : 1.01- 1.29), TG (:1.16, 95% : 1.04-1.24), (: 1.31, 95% : 1.16-1.48), and (:0.84, 95%: 0.77-0.97), and the risk of PAD. In addition, inhibition of was associated with a reduced risk of PAD (:0.68, 95% : 0.57-0.79, <0.001), while no association between the other three gene proxies of LDL inhibition including (=1.21, 95% : 0.87-1.69, =0.250), NPC1L1 (:0.77, 95% 0.44-1.33, =0.344), and APOB (:1.01, 95% :0.87-1.26, =0.890), and the risk of PAD were found. Based on genetic evidence, dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for PAD. PCSK9 inhibitors may be an effective strategy for the treatment of PAD.
血脂状况和降脂药物是否与 PAD 有因果关系,目前仍不清楚。解释血脂状况和降脂药物与 PAD 之间是否存在因果关系。在这项双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析中,我们利用与高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、甘油三酯(TGs)、总胆固醇(TC)和 LDL 相关遗传变异()等血脂特征与外周动脉疾病(PAD)风险之间的因果关系进行了评估。该研究分析了来自全球血脂遗传学联合会和英国生物库的 1,654,960 人的数据,确保从遗传学角度全面深入地了解血脂功能障碍对 PAD 的影响。我们发现高密度脂蛋白(:0.83,95%:0.83-0.77)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(:1.29,95%:1.12-1.50)、总胆固醇(:1.14,95%:1.01-1.29)、总胆固醇(:1.16,95%:1.04-1.24)、(:1.31,95%:1.16-1.48)和(:0.84,95%:0.77-0.97)与 PAD 风险之间存在遗传预测关联。此外,的抑制与 PAD 风险降低相关(:0.68,95%:0.57-0.79,<0.001),而低密度脂蛋白抑制的其他三个基因代用指标包括(=1.21,95% : 0.87-1.69,=0.250)、NPC1L1(:0.77,95% 0.44-1.33,=0.344)和 APOB(:1.01,95% :0.87-1.26,=0.890)与 PAD 风险之间未发现相关性。根据遗传学证据,血脂异常是 PAD 的一个重要风险因素。PCSK9抑制剂可能是治疗PAD的有效策略。
{"title":"Association of lipids and lipid-lowering drugs with peripheral arterial disease: A Mendelian randomization study","authors":"Mengjun Tao MD, Yuanxiang Zhang MD, Qi Li MD, Xuebing Feng PhD, Cheng Ping MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.007","url":null,"abstract":"It remains unclear whether lipid profiles and lipid-lowering medications are causally related to PAD. Explain whether there is a causal relationship between lipid status and lipid-lowering drugs and PAD. In this two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, we assessed the causal relationship between lipid traits, including high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), and LDL-associated genetic variants (), and the risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) using genetic variants associated with these lipid markers. The study analyzed data from 1,654,960 individuals derived from the Global Lipid Genetics Consortium and the UK Biobank, ensuring a robust and comprehensive genetic insight into the effects of lipid dysfunction on PAD. We found genetically predicted associations between HDL (: 0.83, 95% : 0.83-0.77), LDL-c (: 1.29, 95% : 1.12-1.50), TC (: 1.14, 95% : 1.01- 1.29), TG (:1.16, 95% : 1.04-1.24), (: 1.31, 95% : 1.16-1.48), and (:0.84, 95%: 0.77-0.97), and the risk of PAD. In addition, inhibition of was associated with a reduced risk of PAD (:0.68, 95% : 0.57-0.79, <0.001), while no association between the other three gene proxies of LDL inhibition including (=1.21, 95% : 0.87-1.69, =0.250), NPC1L1 (:0.77, 95% 0.44-1.33, =0.344), and APOB (:1.01, 95% :0.87-1.26, =0.890), and the risk of PAD were found. Based on genetic evidence, dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for PAD. PCSK9 inhibitors may be an effective strategy for the treatment of PAD.","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141611954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Higher epicardial adipose tissue volume is associated with higher coronary fatty plaque volume and is regulated by waist circumference but not EPA+DHA supplementation 较高的心外膜脂肪组织体积与较高的冠状动脉脂肪斑块体积相关,并受腰围而非 EPA+DHA 补充剂的调节
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.006
Maral Amangurbanova MD, Ralph Daher MD, Abdul Aziz Asbeutah MD, Bhavya Vemuri MD, Hasan Mirza MD, Smaha Waseem MD, Abdulaziz Malik MD, Francine K. Welty MD Phd
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation lower triglyceride levels. The impact on epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATV), which is associated with cardiovascular events, is unclear. To determine if triglyceride reduction with EPA+DHA supplementation decreases EATV and whether EATV affects coronary plaque. 139 subjects with coronary artery disease on statins were randomized to 3.36 g EPA+DHA daily or none (control) for 30 months. EATV, coronary plaque volumes and coronary artery calcium score were measured with coronary computed tomographic angiography. Change in triglyceride level correlated with change in EATV (=0.47; =0.01). Despite a 6.7% triglyceride reduction (=0.021) with EPA+DHA supplementation compared to no change in control (between group =0.034); both groups had similar reductions in EATV possibly due to statin treatment. EATV above the median (>115.6 cm) was the only determinant of baseline coronary fatty plaque volume (β=2.4, =0.010). After multivariate adjustment, waist circumference, a surrogate of abdominal visceral adiposity, was the only determinant of baseline EATV (OR:1.093; 95% CI:1.003-1.192, =0.042). Moreover, increase in waist circumference was the only predictor of an increase in EATV at 30 months (β=0.320, =0.018). EATV is associated with higher coronary fatty plaque volume and is regulated by waist circumference but not EPA+DHA supplementation at 30-month follow-up in CAD patients on statin treatment. The direct correlation between waist circumference and EATV suggests that maintaining a healthy weight may limit EATV and coronary fatty plaque volume, potentially leading to a decrease in cardiovascular events.
补充二十碳五烯酸(EPA)和二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)可降低甘油三酯水平。对心外膜脂肪组织体积(EATV)的影响尚不清楚,而心外膜脂肪组织体积与心血管事件有关。为了确定补充 EPA+DHA 是否会降低甘油三酯,以及 EATV 是否会影响冠状动脉斑块。139 名服用他汀类药物的冠心病患者被随机分配到每天服用 3.36 克 EPA+DHA 或不服用(对照组),为期 30 个月。冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术测量了EATV、冠状动脉斑块体积和冠状动脉钙化评分。甘油三酯水平的变化与 EATV 的变化相关(=0.47;=0.01)。尽管补充 EPA+DHA 后甘油三酯降低了 6.7%(=0.021),而对照组没有变化(组间=0.034);但可能由于他汀类药物的治疗,两组的 EATV 降低幅度相似。EATV高于中位数(>115.6厘米)是基线冠状动脉脂肪斑块体积的唯一决定因素(β=2.4,=0.010)。经多变量调整后,腰围(腹部内脏脂肪含量的代用指标)是基线 EATV 的唯一决定因素(OR:1.093;95% CI:1.003-1.192,=0.042)。此外,腰围的增加是 30 个月后 EATV 增加的唯一预测因素(β=0.320,=0.018)。在对接受他汀类药物治疗的 CAD 患者进行 30 个月的随访时,EATV 与较高的冠状动脉脂肪斑块体积有关,并受腰围而非 EPA+DHA 补充剂的调节。腰围与EATV之间的直接相关性表明,保持健康的体重可限制EATV和冠状动脉脂肪斑块的体积,从而减少心血管事件的发生。
{"title":"Higher epicardial adipose tissue volume is associated with higher coronary fatty plaque volume and is regulated by waist circumference but not EPA+DHA supplementation","authors":"Maral Amangurbanova MD, Ralph Daher MD, Abdul Aziz Asbeutah MD, Bhavya Vemuri MD, Hasan Mirza MD, Smaha Waseem MD, Abdulaziz Malik MD, Francine K. Welty MD Phd","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.006","url":null,"abstract":"Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation lower triglyceride levels. The impact on epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATV), which is associated with cardiovascular events, is unclear. To determine if triglyceride reduction with EPA+DHA supplementation decreases EATV and whether EATV affects coronary plaque. 139 subjects with coronary artery disease on statins were randomized to 3.36 g EPA+DHA daily or none (control) for 30 months. EATV, coronary plaque volumes and coronary artery calcium score were measured with coronary computed tomographic angiography. Change in triglyceride level correlated with change in EATV (=0.47; =0.01). Despite a 6.7% triglyceride reduction (=0.021) with EPA+DHA supplementation compared to no change in control (between group =0.034); both groups had similar reductions in EATV possibly due to statin treatment. EATV above the median (>115.6 cm) was the only determinant of baseline coronary fatty plaque volume (β=2.4, =0.010). After multivariate adjustment, waist circumference, a surrogate of abdominal visceral adiposity, was the only determinant of baseline EATV (OR:1.093; 95% CI:1.003-1.192, =0.042). Moreover, increase in waist circumference was the only predictor of an increase in EATV at 30 months (β=0.320, =0.018). EATV is associated with higher coronary fatty plaque volume and is regulated by waist circumference but not EPA+DHA supplementation at 30-month follow-up in CAD patients on statin treatment. The direct correlation between waist circumference and EATV suggests that maintaining a healthy weight may limit EATV and coronary fatty plaque volume, potentially leading to a decrease in cardiovascular events.","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141611953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's next for lipoprotein(a)? A national lipid association report from an expert panel discussion 脂蛋白(a)的下一步是什么?全国血脂协会专家小组讨论报告
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.005
Marlys L. Koschinsky PhD FNLA FRSC, Daniel E. Soffer MD FNLA FACP, Michael B. Boffa PhD
This is an exciting time in the lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) field. Attention to this important lipoprotein and potent cardiovascular risk marker is transitioning from the purview of the specialist to that of the general practitioner. Its clinical adoption as an important test is increasing in momentum. There is evidence that Lp(a) contributes to the pathology of atherothrombotic disease, aortic valve stenosis, and childhood ischemic strokes. Three large, Phase 3, randomized, cardiovascular outcomes trials in which Lp(a) is specifically and substantially lowered by mRNA-directed therapies in secondary prevention settings are in progress and will start to report results as early as 2025. Regardless of outcomes, there remain many unanswered questions about Lp(a), ranging from fundamental unknowns about Lp(a) biology, to the complexity of its measurement, optimal screening strategies, and clinical management in individuals with high Lp(a) levels both with and without overt cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, The National Lipid Association (NLA) convened an Expert Discussion involving clinicians and fundamental researchers to identify knowledge gaps in our understanding of Lp(a) biology and pathogenicity and to discuss approaches in the management of elevated Lp(a) in different clinical settings. (183 words)
在脂蛋白(a)(Lp(a))领域,这是一个激动人心的时刻。人们对这种重要的脂蛋白和强效心血管风险标志物的关注正在从专科医生向全科医生过渡。在临床上,它作为一种重要的检测方法正日益受到重视。有证据表明,脂蛋白(a)是动脉粥样血栓性疾病、主动脉瓣狭窄和儿童缺血性中风的病理因素之一。目前正在进行三项大型的第三阶段随机心血管结果试验,在这些试验中,通过 mRNA 引导的疗法在二级预防中特异性地大幅降低脂蛋白(a),最早将于 2025 年开始报告结果。无论结果如何,有关脂蛋白(a)的问题仍有许多未解之谜,从脂蛋白(a)生物学的基本未知到其测量的复杂性、最佳筛查策略,以及患有或未患有明显心血管疾病的高脂蛋白(a)水平个体的临床管理,不一而足。因此,美国国家血脂协会(NLA)召集了一次由临床医生和基础研究人员参加的专家讨论会,以确定我们对脂蛋白(a)生物学和致病性认识的知识差距,并讨论在不同临床环境下管理脂蛋白(a)升高的方法。(183字)
{"title":"What's next for lipoprotein(a)? A national lipid association report from an expert panel discussion","authors":"Marlys L. Koschinsky PhD FNLA FRSC, Daniel E. Soffer MD FNLA FACP, Michael B. Boffa PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.005","url":null,"abstract":"This is an exciting time in the lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) field. Attention to this important lipoprotein and potent cardiovascular risk marker is transitioning from the purview of the specialist to that of the general practitioner. Its clinical adoption as an important test is increasing in momentum. There is evidence that Lp(a) contributes to the pathology of atherothrombotic disease, aortic valve stenosis, and childhood ischemic strokes. Three large, Phase 3, randomized, cardiovascular outcomes trials in which Lp(a) is specifically and substantially lowered by mRNA-directed therapies in secondary prevention settings are in progress and will start to report results as early as 2025. Regardless of outcomes, there remain many unanswered questions about Lp(a), ranging from fundamental unknowns about Lp(a) biology, to the complexity of its measurement, optimal screening strategies, and clinical management in individuals with high Lp(a) levels both with and without overt cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, The National Lipid Association (NLA) convened an Expert Discussion involving clinicians and fundamental researchers to identify knowledge gaps in our understanding of Lp(a) biology and pathogenicity and to discuss approaches in the management of elevated Lp(a) in different clinical settings. (183 words)","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141611955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
*Pericardial and Pleural Effusions after Evolocumab in a Patient with Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia *一名严重家族性高胆固醇血症患者使用埃沃库单抗后出现心包和胸腔积液
IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.034

Background/Synopsis

Inhibitors of PCSK9 by monoclonal antibodies (PSCK9mAb) are efficacious lipid lowering therapies with established outcome benefits. Side effects include nasopharyngitis, influenza-like illness, and injection site reactions.

Objective/Purpose

To describe a less-commonly reported adverse reaction to evolocumab in a patient with severe familial hyperlipidemia (FH), outline applicable testing, and treatment strategies.

Methods

We report a patient with severe FH who developed fever, elevated liver function tests (LFTs), pericardial and pleural effusions with evolocumab.

Results

A 70-year-old gentleman with hyperlipidemia presented to preventive cardiology clinic for consultation. His baseline LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was 400 mg/dL and examination revealed bilateral arcus senilis and xanthomas. Patient's paternal family members were all on lipid-lowering therapy although there were no early atherosclerotic events. Dutch criteria scoring was 21 (definite FH). His lifestyle was optimal, including a Mediterranean diet with daily walking. Risk assessment revealed a calcium score of 3000 AU, carotid atherosclerosis, and lipoprotein (a) of 233.1 nmol/L. Treatment with ezetimibe 10 mg oral daily and rosuvastatin 40 mg oral daily was initiated, achieving a post-treatment LDL-C of 130 mg/dL. To further improve the patient's outcomes by targeting a LDL-C of <70 mg/dL, evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneous biweekly was prescribed. After the first dose, he had fever. Two weeks after the second dose, he was hospitalized with: fever, elevated inflammatory markers and LFTs, pericardial and pleural effusions. Discontinuation resolved symptoms. Post-hospital discharge, laboratory abnormalities normalized. Colchicine and steroids were administered for pericarditis.

This case underscores complexities of managing lipid disorders when confronted with adverse reactions. Based on delayed-onset symptoms and laboratory abnormalities after medication, it is critically-important to consider the possibility of an immune-mediated reaction. The needle cover of the single-dose prefilled autoinjector of evolocumab contains a derivative of latex, a potential risk factor for triggering Gell-Coombs Type I and IV allergic reactions in latex-sensitive individuals. Percutaneous latex skin prick testing is pending. Evolocumab is fully humanized, reducing the risk of immunogenicity, yet this does not exclude adverse drug reactions. The mechanism for common adverse events associated with monoclonal antibodies involves a cytokine-mediated type alpha immune response, explaining flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions. Because of our patient's extensive atherosclerotic disease, additional evaluation will assist us in risk-stratifying treatment: alirocumab, inclisiran, evanicumab or lipoprotein apheresis to reach a target LDL-C of <70 mg/dL.

Conclusions

<
背景/简介单克隆抗体 PCSK9 抑制剂(PSCK9mAb)是一种有效的降脂疗法,具有公认的疗效。副作用包括鼻咽炎、流感样疾病和注射部位反应。方法我们报告了一名严重家族性高脂血症(FH)患者在使用 evolocumab 后出现发热、肝功能检查(LFT)升高、心包积液和胸腔积液的情况。他的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)基线为 400 mg/dL,检查发现双侧老年弧和黄瘤。患者的父系家族成员均接受过降脂治疗,但没有发生过早期动脉粥样硬化事件。荷兰标准评分为 21 分(明确的 FH)。他的生活方式很理想,包括地中海式饮食和每天步行。风险评估显示他的钙含量为 3000 AU,颈动脉粥样硬化,脂蛋白(a)为 233.1 nmol/L。开始每天口服依折麦布 10 毫克和罗伐他汀 40 毫克,治疗后低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降至 130 毫克/分升。为了进一步改善患者的治疗效果,将患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)控制在 70 毫克/分升,医生给他开了 evolocumab 140 毫克,每两周皮下注射一次。第一次用药后,他出现了发烧症状。第二剂两周后,他因发烧、炎症指标和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高、心包积液和胸腔积液而住院。停药后症状缓解。出院后,实验室异常恢复正常。该病例凸显了在出现不良反应时处理血脂紊乱的复杂性。根据用药后延迟出现的症状和实验室异常,考虑免疫介导反应的可能性至关重要。evolocumab 单剂量预充式自动注射器的针套含有一种乳胶衍生物,这是对乳胶敏感的人引发 Gell-Coombs I 型和 IV 型过敏反应的潜在风险因素。经皮乳胶皮肤点刺试验正在进行中。Evolocumab 已完全人源化,降低了免疫原性风险,但这并不排除药物不良反应。单克隆抗体常见不良反应的机制涉及细胞因子介导的α型免疫反应,这也是流感样症状和注射部位反应的原因。由于我们的患者患有广泛的动脉粥样硬化疾病,额外的评估将有助于我们对治疗进行风险分层:阿利珠单抗、clisiran、依凡尼单抗或脂蛋白清除术,以达到<70 mg/dL的目标低密度脂蛋白胆固醇。这种罕见反应的严重性表明需要进行流行病学研究。
{"title":"*Pericardial and Pleural Effusions after Evolocumab in a Patient with Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.034","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.034","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Inhibitors of PCSK9 by monoclonal antibodies (PSCK9mAb) are efficacious lipid lowering therapies with established outcome benefits. Side effects include nasopharyngitis, influenza-like illness, and injection site reactions.</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>To describe a less-commonly reported adverse reaction to evolocumab in a patient with severe familial hyperlipidemia (FH), outline applicable testing, and treatment strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We report a patient with severe FH who developed fever, elevated liver function tests (LFTs), pericardial and pleural effusions with evolocumab.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A 70-year-old gentleman with hyperlipidemia presented to preventive cardiology clinic for consultation. His baseline LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was 400 mg/dL and examination revealed bilateral arcus senilis and xanthomas. Patient's paternal family members were all on lipid-lowering therapy although there were no early atherosclerotic events. Dutch criteria scoring was 21 (definite FH). His lifestyle was optimal, including a Mediterranean diet with daily walking. Risk assessment revealed a calcium score of 3000 AU, carotid atherosclerosis, and lipoprotein (a) of 233.1 nmol/L. Treatment with ezetimibe 10 mg oral daily and rosuvastatin 40 mg oral daily was initiated, achieving a post-treatment LDL-C of 130 mg/dL. To further improve the patient's outcomes by targeting a LDL-C of &lt;70 mg/dL, evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneous biweekly was prescribed. After the first dose, he had fever. Two weeks after the second dose, he was hospitalized with: fever, elevated inflammatory markers and LFTs, pericardial and pleural effusions. Discontinuation resolved symptoms. Post-hospital discharge, laboratory abnormalities normalized. Colchicine and steroids were administered for pericarditis.</p><p>This case underscores complexities of managing lipid disorders when confronted with adverse reactions. Based on delayed-onset symptoms and laboratory abnormalities after medication, it is critically-important to consider the possibility of an immune-mediated reaction. The needle cover of the single-dose prefilled autoinjector of evolocumab contains a derivative of latex, a potential risk factor for triggering Gell-Coombs Type I and IV allergic reactions in latex-sensitive individuals. Percutaneous latex skin prick testing is pending. Evolocumab is fully humanized, reducing the risk of immunogenicity, yet this does not exclude adverse drug reactions. The mechanism for common adverse events associated with monoclonal antibodies involves a cytokine-mediated type alpha immune response, explaining flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions. Because of our patient's extensive atherosclerotic disease, additional evaluation will assist us in risk-stratifying treatment: alirocumab, inclisiran, evanicumab or lipoprotein apheresis to reach a target LDL-C of &lt;70 mg/dL.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141845257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accelerated Atherosclerosis in a Patient With Multifactorial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (MCS), Elevated Lp(a), APOE2/4 Genotype and Diabetes Mellitus. 多因素乳糜微粒血症综合征 (MCS)、脂蛋白(a)升高、APOE2/4 基因型和糖尿病患者的动脉粥样硬化加速。
IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.065

Background/Synopsis

Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS), also known as type V hyperlipoproteinemia, is a rare polygenic disorder characterized by severe hypertriglyceridemia. It is triggered by uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, metabolic syndrome, and certain medications. It is not known whether hypertriglyceridemia associated with MCS accelerates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Objective/Purpose

To speculate the relationship between ASCVD in a patient with hypertriglyceridemia caused by MCS, uncontrolled DM, and polymorphic APOA5, APOE2/4, LMF1 and LP(a) intron mutations.

Methods

We present a 60-year-old male with PMH of severe hypertriglyceridemia (highest 6000mg/dL) with acute pancreatitis at age 40, CAD s/p CABG at age 50, PAD s/p bypass at age 57, HTN, mixed hyperlipidemia, uncontrolled DM, and family history of premature ASCVD. He was subsequently followed at the advanced lipid clinic where his medications included rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, evolocumab, fenofibrate, and icosapent ethyl. He underwent advanced genetic testing with GBinsight.

Results

GBinsight identified various polymorphic genes causing hypertriglyceridemia as follows:

APOA5 - c.*158C>T(rs2266788)

  • -

    This variant is found in ∼10% of the global population and has been associated with hypertriglyceridemia by multiple genome-wide association studies.

APOA5 - c.457G>A(p.Val153Met)(rs3135507)

  • -

    This variant is found in ∼5-10% of the global population and has been associated with modest hypertriglyceridemia and lower HDL-C in the UKBiobank cohort.

APOE2

  • -

    This allele has been associated with a reduction of the major lipolytic enzyme, lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, causing modest hypertriglyceridemia.

LMF1 - p.Arg354Trp(rs143076454)

  • -

    This variant is found in ∼2% of the global population, and has been associated with a reduction of LPL activity causing modest hypertriglyceridemia.

GBinsight identified various pathogenic genes causing elevated Lp(a) as follows:

LPA - Heterozygous for intron c.3947+467T>C(rs10455872)

  • -

    This variant serves a genetic proxy for short isoforms and is strongly associated with increased Lp(a), total and LDL-cholesterol levels, and increased ASCVD risk.

APOE4

  • -

    This allele is associated with increased Lp(a) levels.

Conclusions

We speculate that the combination of these polymorphisms works together to increase risk of severe hypertriglyceridemia, also known as MCS. Several smaller studies have suggested MCS is caused by either

背景/简介多因素乳糜微粒血症综合征(MCS)又称 V 型高脂蛋白血症,是一种罕见的多基因疾病,以严重的高甘油三酯血症为特征。未控制的糖尿病(DM)、肥胖、代谢综合征和某些药物会诱发这种疾病。目标/目的推测一名由 MCS、未控制的 DM 和多态 APOA5、APOE2/4、LMF1 和 LP(a) 内含子突变引起的高甘油三酯血症患者的 ASCVD 之间的关系。方法我们为您介绍一名 60 岁男性患者,他患有严重高甘油三酯血症(最高 6000 毫克/分升)的 PMH,40 岁时曾患急性胰腺炎,50 岁时曾接受过 CAD 手术/CABG 手术,57 岁时曾接受过 PAD 手术/搭桥手术,患有高血压、混合型高脂血症、未控制的 DM 和过早发生 ASCVD 的家族史。随后,他在高级血脂诊所接受了随访,服用的药物包括洛伐他汀、依泽替米贝、依沃洛库单抗、非诺贝特和伊可新戊酯。他接受了 GBinsight 的高级基因检测。结果GBinsight 发现了导致高甘油三酯血症的多种多态性基因,具体如下:APOA5 - c.*158C>T(rs2266788)- 这种变异在全球人口中的发现率为 10%,多项全基因组关联研究表明它与高甘油三酯血症有关。G>A(p.Val153Met)(rs3135507)-该变异在全球 5%至 10%的人群中发现,在英国生物银行队列中,该变异与中度高甘油三酯血症和较低的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇有关。APOE2-该等位基因与主要脂肪分解酶脂蛋白脂肪酶(LPL)活性降低有关,导致中度高甘油三酯血症。LMF1 - p.Arg354Trp(rs143076454)-该变异在全球 2% 的人群中发现,与 LPL 活性降低有关,可引起轻度高甘油三酯血症。+APOE4-该等位基因与脂蛋白(a)水平升高有关。结论我们推测,这些多态性的组合共同作用增加了严重高甘油三酯血症(又称 MCS)的风险。一些较小的研究表明,MCS 是由以下两种主要机制中的任何一种引起的:(1) 小基因多态性的某种组合,或 (2) 调节甘油三酯代谢的五个基因(包括 LPL、APOC2、APOA5、GPHIBP1 和 LMF1)中某一个基因的单基因突变。我们推测,我们的 MCS 患者的 ASCVD 加速是多因素的,除了 Lp(a) 升高这一独立风险因素外,还包括血管内富甘油三酯脂蛋白的致动脉粥样硬化沉积。此外,由于循环甘油三酯增加,他的糖尿病和胰岛素抵抗控制不佳,这进一步加重了血管内皮损伤,加速了急性心血管疾病的发生。
{"title":"Accelerated Atherosclerosis in a Patient With Multifactorial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (MCS), Elevated Lp(a), APOE2/4 Genotype and Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.065","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.065","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS), also known as type V hyperlipoproteinemia, is a rare polygenic disorder characterized by severe hypertriglyceridemia. It is triggered by uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, metabolic syndrome, and certain medications. It is not known whether hypertriglyceridemia associated with MCS accelerates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>To speculate the relationship between ASCVD in a patient with hypertriglyceridemia caused by MCS, uncontrolled DM, and polymorphic APOA5, APOE2/4, LMF1 and LP(a) intron mutations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We present a 60-year-old male with PMH of severe hypertriglyceridemia (highest 6000mg/dL) with acute pancreatitis at age 40, CAD s/p CABG at age 50, PAD s/p bypass at age 57, HTN, mixed hyperlipidemia, uncontrolled DM, and family history of premature ASCVD. He was subsequently followed at the advanced lipid clinic where his medications included rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, evolocumab, fenofibrate, and icosapent ethyl. He underwent advanced genetic testing with GBinsight.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>GBinsight identified various polymorphic genes causing hypertriglyceridemia as follows:</p><p>APOA5 - c.*158C&gt;T(rs2266788)</p><p></p><ul><li><span>-</span><span><p>This variant is found in ∼10% of the global population and has been associated with hypertriglyceridemia by multiple genome-wide association studies.</p></span></li></ul><p>APOA5 - c.457G&gt;A(p.Val153Met)(rs3135507)</p><p></p><ul><li><span>-</span><span><p>This variant is found in ∼5-10% of the global population and has been associated with modest hypertriglyceridemia and lower HDL-C in the UKBiobank cohort.</p></span></li></ul><p>APOE2</p><p></p><ul><li><span>-</span><span><p>This allele has been associated with a reduction of the major lipolytic enzyme, lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, causing modest hypertriglyceridemia.</p></span></li></ul><p>LMF1 - p.Arg354Trp(rs143076454)</p><p></p><ul><li><span>-</span><span><p>This variant is found in ∼2% of the global population, and has been associated with a reduction of LPL activity causing modest hypertriglyceridemia.</p></span></li></ul><p>GBinsight identified various pathogenic genes causing elevated Lp(a) as follows:</p><p>LPA - Heterozygous for intron c.3947+467T&gt;C(rs10455872)</p><p></p><ul><li><span>-</span><span><p>This variant serves a genetic proxy for short isoforms and is strongly associated with increased Lp(a), total and LDL-cholesterol levels, and increased ASCVD risk.</p></span></li></ul><p>APOE4</p><p></p><ul><li><span>-</span><span><p>This allele is associated with increased Lp(a) levels.</p></span></li></ul></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We speculate that the combination of these polymorphisms works together to increase risk of severe hypertriglyceridemia, also known as MCS. Several smaller studies have suggested MCS is caused by either ","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141847022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Attitudes and Barriers to Lipoprotein(a) Testing: A Survey of Providers at the University of Pennsylvania Health System 对脂蛋白(a)检测的态度和障碍:宾夕法尼亚大学医疗系统医疗服务提供者调查
IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.007

Background/Synopsis

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, genetic, and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Elevated Lp(a) levels increase a person's risk for myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, and aortic stenosis. Guidelines generally recommend testing for Lp(a) in high-risk patients, with some recent guidelines recommending testing once in all adults. It is estimated that >20% of the population carry Lp(a) levels high enough to increase risk, however due to undertesting, many of these patients have not been identified.

Objective/Purpose

To understand the attitudes and barriers to testing for Lp(a) across relevant clinical settings and specialties at the University of Pennsylvania Health Systems (UPHS).

Methods

A brief IRB-approved survey in REDCap was distributed via email to select groups of UPHS providers in Cardiology, Neurology, Primary Care, and Vascular Surgery.

Results

The survey was sent to approximately 525 providers in December 2023. Of these, 116 providers completed the survey (54% Internal Medicine/Family Practice, 31% Cardiology, 10% Neurology, 4% Vascular Surgery). Approximately 31.0% (n=36) of all providers routinely tested for Lp(a) in their practice, but this varied by specialty (44% of Cardiologists versus 22% of Internal Medicine/Family Practice providers). For these providers, the most common reasons for testing included a familial history of ASCVD, a history of ASCVD in the patient, and high cholesterol (Table 1). A total of 80 providers (69%) responded that they do not regularly test for Lp(a). The most common reasons for not testing included lack of familiarity with Lp(a), insurance/billing concerns, lack of clinical trial outcomes data, and lack of available pharmaceutical interventions (Table 2).

Conclusions

While there is likely selection bias in the providers who chose to complete the survey, a surprisingly high number of responders (69%) described not regularly testing for Lp(a) in their practice. While results from ongoing clinical trial investigations of novel Lp(a)-lowering treatments may address provider hesitation toward utility of Lp(a)-testing, there is still a large gap to fill in Lp(a) awareness. Increasing provider knowledge of Lp(a) and incorporation into broader clinical guidelines are needed.

背景/简介脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的一个独立、遗传和致病风险因素。脂蛋白(a)水平升高会增加心肌梗死、冠心病、缺血性中风和主动脉狭窄的风险。指南一般建议对高危患者进行脂蛋白(a)检测,最近的一些指南建议对所有成年人进行一次检测。目标/目的了解宾夕法尼亚大学卫生系统(UPHS)相关临床机构和专科对脂蛋白(a)检测的态度和障碍。方法 通过电子邮件向宾夕法尼亚大学医疗系统心脏病学、神经病学、初级保健和血管外科的部分医疗服务提供者群体发送一份经 IRB 批准的 REDCap 简要调查问卷。其中,116 名医疗服务提供者完成了调查(54% 内科/家庭医生、31% 心脏科、10% 神经内科、4% 血管外科)。在所有医疗服务提供者中,约有 31.0%(n=36)的医疗服务提供者在其诊疗过程中例行检测脂蛋白(a),但这一比例因专业而异(44% 的心脏病专家与 22% 的内科/家庭医生)。对于这些医疗机构来说,最常见的检测原因包括家族性 ASCVD 病史、患者有 ASCVD 病史和高胆固醇(表 1)。共有 80 位医疗服务提供者(69%)回答说他们没有定期检测脂蛋白(a)。不检测的最常见原因包括:不熟悉脂蛋白(a)、保险/账单问题、缺乏临床试验结果数据以及缺乏可用的药物干预措施(表 2)。结论虽然选择完成调查的医疗服务提供者可能存在选择偏差,但令人惊讶的是,有很多应答者(69%)表示在他们的实践中没有定期检测脂蛋白(a)。虽然正在进行的新型降 Lp(a)疗法临床试验调查的结果可能会解决医疗服务提供者对 Lp(a)检测效用的犹豫不决,但在 Lp(a)认知方面仍有很大差距需要填补。需要增加医疗服务提供者对脂蛋白(a)的了解,并将其纳入更广泛的临床指南。
{"title":"Attitudes and Barriers to Lipoprotein(a) Testing: A Survey of Providers at the University of Pennsylvania Health System","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, genetic, and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Elevated Lp(a) levels increase a person's risk for myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, and aortic stenosis. Guidelines generally recommend testing for Lp(a) in high-risk patients, with some recent guidelines recommending testing once in all adults. It is estimated that &gt;20% of the population carry Lp(a) levels high enough to increase risk, however due to undertesting, many of these patients have not been identified.</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>To understand the attitudes and barriers to testing for Lp(a) across relevant clinical settings and specialties at the University of Pennsylvania Health Systems (UPHS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A brief IRB-approved survey in REDCap was distributed via email to select groups of UPHS providers in Cardiology, Neurology, Primary Care, and Vascular Surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey was sent to approximately 525 providers in December 2023. Of these, 116 providers completed the survey (54% Internal Medicine/Family Practice, 31% Cardiology, 10% Neurology, 4% Vascular Surgery). Approximately 31.0% (n=36) of all providers routinely tested for Lp(a) in their practice, but this varied by specialty (44% of Cardiologists versus 22% of Internal Medicine/Family Practice providers). For these providers, the most common reasons for testing included a familial history of ASCVD, a history of ASCVD in the patient, and high cholesterol (Table 1). A total of 80 providers (69%) responded that they do not regularly test for Lp(a). The most common reasons for not testing included lack of familiarity with Lp(a), insurance/billing concerns, lack of clinical trial outcomes data, and lack of available pharmaceutical interventions (Table 2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While there is likely selection bias in the providers who chose to complete the survey, a surprisingly high number of responders (69%) described not regularly testing for Lp(a) in their practice. While results from ongoing clinical trial investigations of novel Lp(a)-lowering treatments may address provider hesitation toward utility of Lp(a)-testing, there is still a large gap to fill in Lp(a) awareness. Increasing provider knowledge of Lp(a) and incorporation into broader clinical guidelines are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141838428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Can Continuing Medical Education Help Address Barriers to Screening in Children? 家族性高胆固醇血症:继续医学教育能否帮助解决儿童筛查障碍?
IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.064

Study Funding

This CME activity was supported by an educational grant from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Background/Synopsis

Despite the clear benefit of early treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) in reducing the risk of progressive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), many patients remain undiagnosed until advanced ASCVD is present. Diagnostic delays may relate to low screening rates found among at-risk children <9 years old.

Objective/Purpose

To study the impact of an online CME program to enhance health care providers' (HCPs') competence in diagnosing and managing HoFH and to overcome barriers to screening for at-risk children.

Methods

A 60-minute CME activity was launched live online on 8/2/23 and is available on-demand for 1 year. Knowledge, attitude, and practice-pattern questions were administered before and immediately after the activity (pre vs post). Chi-square tests compared paired responses (P<0.05; pre/post).

Results

As of 1/2/24, 260 HCPs engaged in the program (30% cardiologists, 6% endocrinologists, 29% PCPs; 17% specialize in lipid management or are lipidologists). Nearly 60% of HCPs reported managing patients with very high lipid levels (>400 mg/dL) and the average number of patients with very high lipid levels managed by these participants is 17 per year (approximately 5 of whom are <9 years of age). HCPs' knowledge of the diagnostic criteria for HoFH (30% vs 58%), mechanism of action of ANGPTL3 inhibitors (22% vs 43%), and treatment intensification strategies (48% vs 62%) increased significantly during the CME activity.

Before the activity, approximately 20% of respondents did not measure lipid levels in children <9 years old, 20% only measured in children with a parent diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or with a family history of CVD, and 24% only measured in children with HoFH symptoms. After the activity, HCPs estimated that 60% of their patients with very high lipid levels (>400 mg/dL) may have undiagnosed HoFH. The proportion of HCPs who strongly agreed with the American Academy of Pediatrics' recommendation for lipid screening for children with a genetic risk of FH or ASCVD as early as age 2 years increased from 14% to 37%.

Conclusions

CME can break down barriers to lipid screening in children at risk for HoFH by enhancing HCPs' knowledge of HoFH diagnosis and risk factors. While the activity enhanced knowledge about the evolving treatment landscape, future education on guidelines and treatment intensification can address remaining gaps in the adoption of best practices and novel agents for HoFH.

背景/简介尽管早期治疗同型家族性高胆固醇血症(HoFH)对降低进展性动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险有明显的益处,但许多患者直到出现晚期ASCVD时才被诊断出来。目标/目的研究在线继续医学教育项目对提高医疗保健提供者(HCPs)诊断和管理 HoFH 的能力以及克服高危儿童筛查障碍的影响。方法于 23 年 2 月 8 日在线直播了一项 60 分钟的继续医学教育活动,并可在一年内点播。在活动前后(活动前与活动后)分别进行了知识、态度和实践模式的提问。结果截至 1/2/24 日,共有 260 名高级保健医生参与了该计划(30% 为心脏病专家,6% 为内分泌专家,29% 为初级保健医生;17% 擅长血脂管理或为血脂专家)。近 60% 的初级保健医生报告说,他们管理过血脂水平很高(400 mg/dL)的患者,这些参与者每年管理的血脂水平很高的患者平均人数为 17 人(其中约 5 人的年龄为 9 岁)。在 CME 活动期间,HCPs 对 HoFH 诊断标准(30% vs 58%)、ANGPTL3 抑制剂的作用机制(22% vs 43%)和强化治疗策略(48% vs 62%)的了解显著增加。在活动之前,约 20% 的受访者没有测量过 9 岁儿童的血脂水平,20% 的受访者只测量过父母一方被诊断为家族性高胆固醇血症 (FH) 或有心血管疾病家族史的儿童,24% 的受访者只测量过有 HoFH 症状的儿童。活动结束后,高级保健医生估计,在他们的血脂水平很高(400 毫克/分升)的患者中,有 60% 可能患有未确诊的 HoFH。非常赞同美国儿科学会关于在 2 岁前对有 FH 或 ASCVD 遗传风险的儿童进行血脂筛查的建议的 HCPs 比例从 14% 上升到 37%。结论通过增强 HCPs 对 HoFH 诊断和风险因素的了解,CME 可以打破对有 HoFH 风险的儿童进行血脂筛查的障碍。虽然该活动增强了人们对不断发展的治疗方法的了解,但未来关于指南和强化治疗的教育可以解决在采用最佳实践和新型药物治疗 HoFH 方面仍然存在的差距。
{"title":"Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Can Continuing Medical Education Help Address Barriers to Screening in Children?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.064","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.064","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Funding</h3><p>This CME activity was supported by an educational grant from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</p></div><div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Despite the clear benefit of early treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) in reducing the risk of progressive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), many patients remain undiagnosed until advanced ASCVD is present. Diagnostic delays may relate to low screening rates found among at-risk children &lt;9 years old.</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>To study the impact of an online CME program to enhance health care providers' (HCPs') competence in diagnosing and managing HoFH and to overcome barriers to screening for at-risk children.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 60-minute CME activity was launched live online on 8/2/23 and is available on-demand for 1 year. Knowledge, attitude, and practice-pattern questions were administered before and immediately after the activity (pre vs post). Chi-square tests compared paired responses (P&lt;0.05; pre/post).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As of 1/2/24, 260 HCPs engaged in the program (30% cardiologists, 6% endocrinologists, 29% PCPs; 17% specialize in lipid management or are lipidologists). Nearly 60% of HCPs reported managing patients with very high lipid levels (&gt;400 mg/dL) and the average number of patients with very high lipid levels managed by these participants is 17 per year (approximately 5 of whom are &lt;9 years of age). HCPs' knowledge of the diagnostic criteria for HoFH (30% vs 58%), mechanism of action of ANGPTL3 inhibitors (22% vs 43%), and treatment intensification strategies (48% vs 62%) increased significantly during the CME activity.</p><p>Before the activity, approximately 20% of respondents did not measure lipid levels in children &lt;9 years old, 20% only measured in children with a parent diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or with a family history of CVD, and 24% only measured in children with HoFH symptoms. After the activity, HCPs estimated that 60% of their patients with very high lipid levels (&gt;400 mg/dL) may have undiagnosed HoFH. The proportion of HCPs who strongly agreed with the American Academy of Pediatrics' recommendation for lipid screening for children with a genetic risk of FH or ASCVD as early as age 2 years increased from 14% to 37%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CME can break down barriers to lipid screening in children at risk for HoFH by enhancing HCPs' knowledge of HoFH diagnosis and risk factors. While the activity enhanced knowledge about the evolving treatment landscape, future education on guidelines and treatment intensification can address remaining gaps in the adoption of best practices and novel agents for HoFH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141839781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association Between Niacin-ER Use, Safety, and Cardiovascular Events. A Single Center Experience. 烟酸-ER 的使用、安全性和心血管事件之间的关系。单中心经验。
IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.089

Background/Synopsis

Studies reveal increased incidences of cardiovascular events such as heart attacks and strokes in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels. Niacin-ER has shown to lower lipoprotein(a) levels by approximately 30% though unknown if niacin-ER reduces cardiovascular events in this population. This single center study evaluates 129 patients with a personal or family history of a premature cardiovascular event whose lipoprotein(a) levels were greater than 75nmol/L and prescribed niacin-ER.

Objective/Purpose

Identify patients with personal or family history of premature cardiovascular events through history and screen patients for baseline serum lipoprotein(a); levels greater than or equal to 75nmol/L were included. Patients were monitored for incidences of cardiovascular events, elevation of liver enzymes, and side-effects of niacin-ER.

The study is an effort to determine if niacin-ER can reduce cardiovascular events. While current ASO-RNA and siRNA studies are undergoing trials, niacin-ER may be a less costly alternative.

Methods

The study followed 129 adult patients seen by a Board Certified Lipidologist/Cardiologist from 2014-2024 with baseline lipoprotein(a) greater than 75 nmol/L. Patients were started on 1000 mg-2000 mg (mean 1713 mg) of niacin-ER and a high intensity statin. In the study, 118 patients were prescribed niacin-ER, while 11 were a better fit for PCSK-9 therapy. Of the 118 patients, 36 could not tolerate the flushing, despite mitigating strategies. Patients’ hospital and outpatient records were reviewed for cardiovascular events.

Results

The average baseline value of lipoprotein(a) was 221.59 nmol/L, higher than 35-70 nmol/L in AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE trials. Current trials with siRNA and ASO-RNA therapies set inclusion criteria at >150 nmol/L. The average lipoprotein(a) after starting niacin-ER amounted to 157.71 nmol/L, a 33.68% reduction.

Fifteen patients laboratory tests resulted in non-prohibitive mildly elevated liver function tests (LFTs), with maximum ALT and AST of 85 U/L and 68 U/L, respectively, after starting niacin.

All patients were on high-intensity statin.

Conclusions

Niacin-ER reduced lipoprotein(a) levels by 33.68%, comparable to published data of 30%.

Niacin-ER continues to be shown as safe and well-tolerated with no incidences of strokes, infections, gastrointestinal symptoms, or rhabdomyolysis; there was a non-significant elevation in LFTs.

In the 83 patients taking niacin-ER, there were no subsequent cardiovascular events up to ten years follow up.

Reduction in cardiovascular events could not be observed with the low sample size. The study reinforces the need to further assess the effectiveness of niacin-ER on cardiovascular events while prospective therapies continue through trials.

背景/简介研究显示,脂蛋白(a)水平升高的患者心脏病发作和中风等心血管事件的发生率增加。烟酸-ER能将脂蛋白(a)水平降低约30%,但烟酸-ER是否能减少这类人群的心血管事件尚不清楚。这项单中心研究评估了 129 名有过早心血管事件个人或家族史、脂蛋白(a)水平大于 75nmol/L 并处方烟酸-ER 的患者。目标/目的通过病史确定有过早心血管事件个人或家族史的患者,并筛查患者的基线血清脂蛋白(a);将脂蛋白(a)水平大于或等于 75nmol/L 的患者包括在内。该研究旨在确定烟酸-ER 是否能减少心血管事件的发生。虽然目前正在进行 ASO-RNA 和 siRNA 研究,但烟酸-ER 可能是一种成本较低的替代品。方法该研究在 2014-2024 年间跟踪了 129 名由委员会认证的脂质学家/心脏病专家诊治的基线脂蛋白(a)大于 75 nmol/L 的成年患者。患者开始服用 1000 毫克-2000 毫克(平均 1713 毫克)烟酸-ER 和高强度他汀类药物。在这项研究中,118 名患者接受了烟酸-ER 治疗,11 名患者更适合 PCSK-9 治疗。在 118 名患者中,尽管采取了缓解策略,但仍有 36 人无法忍受潮红。结果脂蛋白(a)的平均基线值为221.59 nmol/L,高于AIM-HIGH和HPS2-THRIVE试验中的35-70 nmol/L。目前使用 siRNA 和 ASO-RNA 疗法的试验将纳入标准定为 150 nmol/L。15名患者的实验室检查结果为非抑制性轻度肝功能检查(LFT)升高,开始服用烟酸后,ALT和AST的最高值分别为85 U/L和68 U/L,所有患者均服用高强度他汀类药物。结论烟酸-ER可使脂蛋白(a)水平降低33.68%,与已发表的30%的数据相当。烟酸-ER继续显示出安全性和良好的耐受性,没有中风、感染、胃肠道症状或横纹肌溶解症的发生;低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LFTs)没有显著升高。由于样本量较少,因此无法观察到烟酸-ER对心血管事件的减少作用。这项研究强调,在继续进行前瞻性治疗试验的同时,有必要进一步评估烟酸-ER对心血管事件的影响。
{"title":"Association Between Niacin-ER Use, Safety, and Cardiovascular Events. A Single Center Experience.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.089","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.089","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Studies reveal increased incidences of cardiovascular events such as heart attacks and strokes in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels. Niacin-ER has shown to lower lipoprotein(a) levels by approximately 30% though unknown if niacin-ER reduces cardiovascular events in this population. This single center study evaluates 129 patients with a personal or family history of a premature cardiovascular event whose lipoprotein(a) levels were greater than 75nmol/L and prescribed niacin-ER.</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>Identify patients with personal or family history of premature cardiovascular events through history and screen patients for baseline serum lipoprotein(a); levels greater than or equal to 75nmol/L were included. Patients were monitored for incidences of cardiovascular events, elevation of liver enzymes, and side-effects of niacin-ER.</p><p>The study is an effort to determine if niacin-ER can reduce cardiovascular events. While current ASO-RNA and siRNA studies are undergoing trials, niacin-ER may be a less costly alternative.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study followed 129 adult patients seen by a Board Certified Lipidologist/Cardiologist from 2014-2024 with baseline lipoprotein(a) greater than 75 nmol/L. Patients were started on 1000 mg-2000 mg (mean 1713 mg) of niacin-ER and a high intensity statin. In the study, 118 patients were prescribed niacin-ER, while 11 were a better fit for PCSK-9 therapy. Of the 118 patients, 36 could not tolerate the flushing, despite mitigating strategies. Patients’ hospital and outpatient records were reviewed for cardiovascular events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average baseline value of lipoprotein(a) was 221.59 nmol/L, higher than 35-70 nmol/L in AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE trials. Current trials with siRNA and ASO-RNA therapies set inclusion criteria at &gt;150 nmol/L. The average lipoprotein(a) after starting niacin-ER amounted to 157.71 nmol/L, a 33.68% reduction.</p><p>Fifteen patients laboratory tests resulted in non-prohibitive mildly elevated liver function tests (LFTs), with maximum ALT and AST of 85 U/L and 68 U/L, respectively, after starting niacin.</p><p>All patients were on high-intensity statin.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Niacin-ER reduced lipoprotein(a) levels by 33.68%, comparable to published data of 30%.</p><p>Niacin-ER continues to be shown as safe and well-tolerated with no incidences of strokes, infections, gastrointestinal symptoms, or rhabdomyolysis; there was a non-significant elevation in LFTs.</p><p>In the 83 patients taking niacin-ER, there were no subsequent cardiovascular events up to ten years follow up.</p><p>Reduction in cardiovascular events could not be observed with the low sample size. The study reinforces the need to further assess the effectiveness of niacin-ER on cardiovascular events while prospective therapies continue through trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141852369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Rare Encounter: Familial Lipoprotein Lipase Deficiency in Pregnancy - Case Review and Emerging Therapies for Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome 罕见的遭遇:妊娠期家族性脂蛋白脂酶缺乏症--病例回顾和家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征的新兴疗法
IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.027

Background/Synopsis

Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (FCS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder affecting chylomicron metabolism, resulting in severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG) associated with recurrent acute pancreatitis (AP). We present a case of young woman with a rare instance of familial lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency during pregnancy.

Objective/Purpose

Despite that FCS is associated with poor quality of life and increased lifelong risk of sHTG and AP, there is lack of awareness about the disease. We aim to describe clinical features and complications associated with FCS, with the overarching objective of enhancing awareness regarding this condition. Additionally, we explore emerging therapies for the treatment of sHTG.

Methods

Literature review and retrospective review of electronic health records were performed.

Results

17-year-old Guatemalan female at 25 weeks gestation presented with acute abdominal pain and was found to have a lipase of 4076 mg/dL, amylase of 860 mg/dL and triglyceride (TG) level of 2233 mg/dL requiring apheresis for sHTG induced AP. She re-presented multiple times with sHTG and required treatment for recurrent AP. Genetic testing showed homozygous LPL gene mutation involving novel early truncation and ABCA1 transporter heterozygosity linked to reduced HDL levels. Patient continues to experience a sequela of complications despite treatment with fibrates, statins, omega-3-acid ethyl esters and a low-fat diet.

Conclusions

There are currently no treatments for FCS except for lifelong fat restrictive diet. Orlistat, a gastric and pancreatic lipase inhibitor has shown some promise in terms of reducing TG levels. Prior therapies have targeted various phenotypes of sHTG in familial combined hyperlipidemia syndromes with off-label use in FCS. More recently, targeted pharmacotherapies for FCS including apoC-III hepatocyte-directed antisense oligonucleotide such as Volanesorsen (approved in Europe) and Olezarsen (currently in phase-3 trial) have shown promise. Preliminary results from the CORE trials have shown significant reduction in TG levels in FCS patients and 100% reduction in AP. Additionally, small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) based therapies are being studied in patients with FCS.

Albeit a rare genetic disorder, FCS should be suspected in patients with sHTG in the absence of secondary causes and should be referred to lipid specialists for further management. FCS in pregnancy can pose even more challenges given increased insulin resistance and fetal and maternal burden of disease. Trials for novel targeted therapies have shown encouraging results and may help reduce ASCVD risk and complications associated with FCS.

背景/简介家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征(Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome,FCS)是一种罕见的常染色体隐性遗传疾病,影响乳糜微粒的代谢,导致严重的高甘油三酯血症(sHTG),并伴有反复发作的急性胰腺炎(AP)。我们介绍了一例罕见的妊娠期家族性脂蛋白脂酶(LPL)缺乏症年轻女性患者。尽管 FCS 与生活质量低下、sHTG 和 AP 终生风险增加有关,但人们对该疾病缺乏认识。我们旨在描述与 FCS 相关的临床特征和并发症,其总体目标是提高人们对这种疾病的认识。结果 17 岁的危地马拉女性,妊娠 25 周,因急性腹痛就诊,发现脂肪酶为 4076 毫克/分升,淀粉酶为 860 毫克/分升,甘油三酯(TG)水平为 2233 毫克/分升。她多次再次出现 sHTG,需要对复发性 AP 进行治疗。基因检测显示,患者的 LPL 基因发生了新的早期截断和 ABCA1 转运体杂合,导致高密度脂蛋白水平降低。尽管患者接受了纤维酸盐、他汀类药物、ω-3-酸乙酯和低脂饮食治疗,但仍出现了一系列并发症。奥利司他是一种胃和胰脂肪酶抑制剂,在降低 TG 水平方面显示出一定的前景。先前的疗法针对家族性联合高脂血症综合征中各种表型的 sHTG,并在标签外用于 FCS。最近,针对 FCS 的靶向药物疗法,包括载脂蛋白 C-III 肝细胞定向反义寡核苷酸,如 Volanesorsen(已获欧洲批准)和 Olezarsen(目前处于第三阶段试验中),已显示出良好的前景。CORE 试验的初步结果显示,FCS 患者的 TG 水平显著降低,AP 降低了 100%。此外,基于小干扰核糖核酸(siRNA)的疗法也正在 FCS 患者中进行研究。尽管 FCS 是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,但在没有继发性病因的情况下,SHTG 患者也应怀疑 FCS,并应转诊至血脂专科医生接受进一步治疗。鉴于胰岛素抵抗以及胎儿和母体疾病负担的增加,妊娠期 FCS 可能会带来更大的挑战。新型靶向疗法的试验结果令人鼓舞,可能有助于降低 ASCVD 风险和与 FCS 相关的并发症。
{"title":"A Rare Encounter: Familial Lipoprotein Lipase Deficiency in Pregnancy - Case Review and Emerging Therapies for Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.027","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.027","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (FCS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder affecting chylomicron metabolism, resulting in severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG) associated with recurrent acute pancreatitis (AP). We present a case of young woman with a rare instance of familial lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency during pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>Despite that FCS is associated with poor quality of life and increased lifelong risk of sHTG and AP, there is lack of awareness about the disease. We aim to describe clinical features and complications associated with FCS, with the overarching objective of enhancing awareness regarding this condition. Additionally, we explore emerging therapies for the treatment of sHTG.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Literature review and retrospective review of electronic health records were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>17-year-old Guatemalan female at 25 weeks gestation presented with acute abdominal pain and was found to have a lipase of 4076 mg/dL, amylase of 860 mg/dL and triglyceride (TG) level of 2233 mg/dL requiring apheresis for sHTG induced AP. She re-presented multiple times with sHTG and required treatment for recurrent AP. Genetic testing showed homozygous LPL gene mutation involving novel early truncation and ABCA1 transporter heterozygosity linked to reduced HDL levels. Patient continues to experience a sequela of complications despite treatment with fibrates, statins, omega-3-acid ethyl esters and a low-fat diet.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are currently no treatments for FCS except for lifelong fat restrictive diet. Orlistat, a gastric and pancreatic lipase inhibitor has shown some promise in terms of reducing TG levels. Prior therapies have targeted various phenotypes of sHTG in familial combined hyperlipidemia syndromes with off-label use in FCS. More recently, targeted pharmacotherapies for FCS including apoC-III hepatocyte-directed antisense oligonucleotide such as Volanesorsen (approved in Europe) and Olezarsen (currently in phase-3 trial) have shown promise. Preliminary results from the CORE trials have shown significant reduction in TG levels in FCS patients and 100% reduction in AP. Additionally, small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) based therapies are being studied in patients with FCS.</p><p>Albeit a rare genetic disorder, FCS should be suspected in patients with sHTG in the absence of secondary causes and should be referred to lipid specialists for further management. FCS in pregnancy can pose even more challenges given increased insulin resistance and fetal and maternal burden of disease. Trials for novel targeted therapies have shown encouraging results and may help reduce ASCVD risk and complications associated with FCS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141841924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of clinical lipidology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1