Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery最新文献

Background: Older patients who are predisposed to bullous pemphigoid (BP) may exhibit reluctance to undergo skin biopsy due to potential complications.

Objectives: This study aimed to conduct a comparative evaluation among histology, direct immunofluorescence (DIF), and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) to determine the optimal diagnostic tool in elderly patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 841 patients suspected of having BP. All cases were initially classified as BP and non-BP in accordance with the diagnostic criteria. Student's t-test and chi-squared test examined differences between the 2 groups. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio detected by the 3 tools. We stratified the analysis by age to compare the performance of the diagnostic tools and examined the risk factors associated with BP using logistic regression.

Results: Overall, histology exhibited the highest sensitivity (89.4%), while DIF demonstrated the highest specificity (67.1%). In the elderly, the IIF test exhibited the highest specificity (57.5%), the highest positive likelihood ratio (2.047), and the lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.226). Among patients taking Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, IIF demonstrated the highest positive likelihood ratio (3.194) and the second-lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.235).

Conclusions: In cases that elderly patients suspected of having BP are reluctant to undergo skin biopsy, IIF demonstrates the optimal diagnostic method due to its highest positive likelihood ratio, the lowest negative likelihood ratio among the 3 diagnostic measures. Moreover, IIF is found to be a more effective tool for detecting BP in patients using DPP-4 inhibitors.

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) and uses different light sources as well as photosensitizers. In addition, PDT is often combined with other physical therapies or drugs.

Objectives: This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of different PDTs against AK lesions based on Complete Response (CR) by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using PDT for AK were screened and a Bayesian model was developed to perform an NMA of CR at 3 months after the first treatment.

Results: Twenty-six trials involving 2285 patients and 14 treatments were included. The treatments were broadly divided into mono-PDT and combination therapy. The photodynamic monotherapies included methyl 5-aminolevulinic acid (MAL)-daylight (DL)-PDT, MAL-light-emitting diode (LED)-PDT, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-LED-PDT, etc. Combination therapies included ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted MAL-LED-PDT, calcipotriol (CAL)-assisted MAL-LED-PDT, and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu)-assisted MAL-DL-PDT. The results of the NMA showed that there is a high probability that AFL-MAL-LED-PDT is the most effective treatment option, followed by CAL-MAL-LED-PDT and ALA-LED-PDT. The subgroup analysis showed that MAL-based PDT had better efficacy when using LED versus other light sources, while LED-based PDT was likely to have better efficacy when using ALA versus other photosensitizers.

Conclusions: The results of this NMA suggest that AFL-MAL-LED-PDT may be the superior choice for achieving complete clearance of AK lesions. PDT using LED as the light source and ALA as the photosensitizer may be more effective for the treatment of AK. However, more RCTs are needed to verify the results of this analysis.