首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Microbiology最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluating the clinical utility of Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia bronchoalveolar PCRs for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary infections in patients with hematological malignancies. 评价曲霉、毛霉菌和诺卡菌支气管肺泡pcr诊断血液恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性肺部感染的临床应用价值。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01355-24
Varshini Gali, Rakan Al-Ghanamah, Katie Finnigan, Or Kalchiem-Dekel, Mini Kamboj, Tobias M Hohl, N Esther Babady, Genovefa A Papanicolaou, Yeon Joo Lee

Invasive pulmonary infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. A delay in identifying a causative agent may result in late initiation of appropriate treatment and adverse clinical outcomes. We examine the diagnostic utility of PCR-based assays in evaluating invasive pulmonary infections from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Patients with hematological malignancies and HCT recipients who underwent bronchoscopy with BAL from January 2020 to January 2024 for unexplained pulmonary infiltrates and had ≥1 PCR targeting Aspergillus, Mucorales, or Nocardia (Eurofins-Viracor, KS) were reviewed. Testing for microbiology and pathology except BAL PCRs to identify the etiology of pulmonary infiltrate was defined as standard-of-care. Invasive fungal diseases were defined as per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) 2020 guidelines. Pulmonary nocardiosis was defined by a combination of clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic criteria. Of 134 patients, 77 were HCT recipients, and 70% were on antifungal agents. Thirty-two were diagnosed with infection with one of the three target pathogens, including 20 with probable or proven invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), seven with mucormycosis, and three with nocardiosis. For IPA, 19 were diagnosed by standard-of-care, and one (5%) was solely diagnosed by Aspergillus PCR. Mucorales PCR was positive in three of seven cases of proven mucormycosis, but the cultures were negative in all. All three nocardiosis cases were detected by PCR and culture. In our cohort, PCR targeting Mucorales and Nocardia can improve the early detection of invasive pulmonary infection, whereas Aspergillus PCR has a low added value when done in conjunction with standard-of-care, including BAL galactomannan.IMPORTANCEInvasive pulmonary infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Timely diagnosis of invasive pulmonary infection reduces the time to targeted treatment initiation and improves clinical outcomes. The recent European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) update included the addition of serum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) PCR as a method to determine probable Aspergillus disease. This reflects an increased utilization of PCR-based assays in the diagnosis of fungal diseases. Although PCR assays for Aspergillus diagnosis have been well characterized in the literature, their additive clinical utility in conjunction with BAL galactomannan index measurements remains unclear. Moreover, only a few reports characterize the analytic and clinical performance of Mucorales and Nocardia PCR.

侵袭性肺部感染是恶性血液病患者和造血干细胞移植(HCT)接受者发病和死亡的重要原因。在确定病原体方面的延误可能导致适当治疗的延迟开始和不良的临床结果。我们研究了基于pcr的检测在评估支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)引起的侵袭性肺部感染中的诊断效用。我们回顾了2020年1月至2024年1月期间因不明原因肺部浸润而接受BAL支气管镜检查的血液恶性肿瘤患者和HCT接受者,这些患者具有≥1个PCR靶向曲霉、Mucorales或诺卡菌(eurofin - viracor, KS)。除BAL pcr外,检测微生物学和病理学以确定肺浸润的病因被定义为标准护理。侵袭性真菌疾病的定义是根据欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织和真菌病研究小组教育和研究联盟(EORTC/MSGERC) 2020指南。肺诺卡菌病的定义是结合临床、放射学和微生物学标准。134例患者中,77例接受HCT治疗,70%接受抗真菌药物治疗。32人被诊断为三种目标病原体之一的感染,其中20人可能或证实为侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA), 7人患有毛霉病,3人患有诺卡病。对于IPA, 19例通过标准护理诊断,1例(5%)仅通过曲霉PCR诊断。7例毛霉菌病中3例毛霉菌病PCR阳性,但所有培养均为阴性。3例诺卡菌病均经PCR和培养检测。在我们的队列中,针对Mucorales和Nocardia的PCR可以提高侵袭性肺部感染的早期检测,而曲霉菌PCR在与标准护理(包括BAL半乳甘露聚糖)结合时的附加价值较低。侵袭性肺部感染是免疫功能低下患者发病和死亡的重要原因。侵袭性肺部感染的及时诊断减少了开始靶向治疗的时间,改善了临床结果。最近的欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织和真菌病研究组教育和研究联盟(EORTC/MSGERC)更新包括增加血清或支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL) PCR作为确定可能的曲霉病的方法。这反映了基于pcr的检测方法在真菌疾病诊断中的应用日益增加。虽然PCR检测曲霉的诊断已经在文献中得到了很好的描述,但它们与BAL半乳甘露聚糖指数测量相结合的附加临床效用仍不清楚。此外,只有少数报道描述了毛霉菌和诺卡菌PCR的分析和临床表现。
{"title":"Evaluating the clinical utility of <i>Aspergillus</i>, <i>Mucorales,</i> and <i>Nocardia</i> bronchoalveolar PCRs for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary infections in patients with hematological malignancies.","authors":"Varshini Gali, Rakan Al-Ghanamah, Katie Finnigan, Or Kalchiem-Dekel, Mini Kamboj, Tobias M Hohl, N Esther Babady, Genovefa A Papanicolaou, Yeon Joo Lee","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01355-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01355-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invasive pulmonary infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. A delay in identifying a causative agent may result in late initiation of appropriate treatment and adverse clinical outcomes. We examine the diagnostic utility of PCR-based assays in evaluating invasive pulmonary infections from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Patients with hematological malignancies and HCT recipients who underwent bronchoscopy with BAL from January 2020 to January 2024 for unexplained pulmonary infiltrates and had ≥1 PCR targeting <i>Aspergillus</i>, <i>Mucorales</i>, or <i>Nocardia</i> (Eurofins-Viracor, KS) were reviewed. Testing for microbiology and pathology except BAL PCRs to identify the etiology of pulmonary infiltrate was defined as standard-of-care. Invasive fungal diseases were defined as per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) 2020 guidelines. Pulmonary nocardiosis was defined by a combination of clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic criteria. Of 134 patients, 77 were HCT recipients, and 70% were on antifungal agents. Thirty-two were diagnosed with infection with one of the three target pathogens, including 20 with probable or proven invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), seven with mucormycosis, and three with nocardiosis. For IPA, 19 were diagnosed by standard-of-care, and one (5%) was solely diagnosed by <i>Aspergillus</i> PCR. <i>Mucorales</i> PCR was positive in three of seven cases of proven mucormycosis, but the cultures were negative in all. All three nocardiosis cases were detected by PCR and culture. In our cohort, PCR targeting <i>Mucorales</i> and <i>Nocardia</i> can improve the early detection of invasive pulmonary infection, whereas <i>Aspergillus</i> PCR has a low added value when done in conjunction with standard-of-care, including BAL galactomannan.IMPORTANCEInvasive pulmonary infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Timely diagnosis of invasive pulmonary infection reduces the time to targeted treatment initiation and improves clinical outcomes. The recent European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) update included the addition of serum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) PCR as a method to determine probable <i>Aspergillus</i> disease. This reflects an increased utilization of PCR-based assays in the diagnosis of fungal diseases. Although PCR assays for <i>Aspergillus</i> diagnosis have been well characterized in the literature, their additive clinical utility in conjunction with BAL galactomannan index measurements remains unclear. Moreover, only a few reports characterize the analytic and clinical performance of <i>Mucorales</i> and <i>Nocardia</i> PCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0135524"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis. 有无囊性纤维化患者的洋葱伯克霍尔德菌复合分离株的药敏试验方法评价。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01480-24
Peter Jorth, Carmila Manuel, Tracey McLemore, Romney M Humphries, Nicolynn C Cole, Audrey N Schuetz, Dennis Garica, Maria Maldonado, Natasha Rivero, Anna Clara Milesi Galdino, Diana Celedonio, John J LiPuma, Daniel A Green, James E A Zlosnik, Maria Traczewski, Holly K Huse

The Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) is a group of Gram-negative bacteria that cause opportunistic infections, most notably in people with cystic fibrosis (CF), and have been associated with outbreaks caused by contaminated medical products. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often used to guide treatment for BCC infections, perhaps most importantly in people with CF who are being considered for lung transplant. However, recent studies have highlighted problems with AST methods. Here, we address limitations from previous studies to further evaluate BCC AST methods. We assessed the performance of reference broth microdilution (BMD), disk diffusion (DD) using Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) from three manufacturers, agar dilution (AD), and gradient diffusion (ETEST) for ceftazidime (CAZ), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEM), minocycline (MIN), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on a set of 205 BCC isolates. The isolate set included 100 isolates from people with CF and 105 isolates from people without CF from a variety of sources, which enabled us to systematically evaluate whether specimen source impacts AST performance. For all BCC isolates, BMD reproducibility was 93%, 98%, 99%, 98%, and 96% for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX, respectively. Using BMD as the comparator method, we show that DD, AD, and ETEST perform poorly, with neither MHA manufacturer nor specimen source significantly impacting method performance. Based on our data, we recommend that routine AST should not be performed for BCC isolates. If a provider requests AST, clinical microbiology laboratories should perform Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference methodology for BMD (stored frozen) and report MIC only.IMPORTANCEAntimicrobial susceptibility testing for the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) is often used to determine eligibility for lung transplant in people with cystic fibrosis. However, problems with method performance have been reported. Here, we systematically evaluate the performance of reference broth microdilution, disk diffusion, agar dilution, and gradient diffusion (ETEST) for BCC organisms isolated from people with and without cystic fibrosis. We show that broth microdilution reproducibility is acceptable for levofloxacin, meropenem, minocycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, while ceftazidime was just below the acceptability cut-off. Regardless of specimen source, the results from disk diffusion, agar dilution, and ETEST do not correlate with broth microdilution. Based on these findings, we recommend that antimicrobial susceptibility testing should not be routinely performed for BCC, and if requested by the provider, only broth microdilution following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines should be used. Providers should be aware of the significant limitations of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for BCC.

洋葱伯克霍尔德菌复合体(BCC)是一组革兰氏阴性菌,可引起机会性感染,最明显的是囊性纤维化(CF)患者,并与受污染的医疗产品引起的疫情有关。抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)通常用于指导BCC感染的治疗,可能对正在考虑肺移植的CF患者最重要。然而,最近的研究强调了AST方法的问题。在这里,我们解决了先前研究的局限性,以进一步评估BCC AST方法。我们对205株BCC分离株的头孢他啶(CAZ)、左氧氟沙星(LVX)、美罗培南(MEM)、米诺环素(MIN)和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(mp - smx)进行了对照肉汤微量稀释(BMD)、米勒-辛顿琼脂(MHA)光盘扩散(DD)、琼脂稀释(AD)和梯度扩散(ETEST)评估。该分离株集包括100株来自CF患者的分离株和105株来自不同来源的非CF患者的分离株,这使我们能够系统地评估样本来源是否影响AST性能。对于所有BCC分离株,CAZ、LVX、MEM、MIN和TMP-SMX的BMD重现性分别为93%、98%、99%、98%和96%。使用BMD作为比较方法,我们发现DD、AD和ETEST表现不佳,MHA制造商和样本来源都没有显著影响方法的性能。根据我们的数据,我们建议不应对BCC分离株进行常规AST。如果提供者要求AST,临床微生物实验室应执行临床和实验室标准协会的BMD(储存冷冻)参考方法,并仅报告MIC。重要意义洋葱伯克霍尔德菌复合体(BCC)的抗菌药敏试验通常用于确定囊性纤维化患者是否适合肺移植。然而,方法性能的问题已经被报道。在这里,我们系统地评估了参考肉汤微稀释、圆盘扩散、琼脂稀释和梯度扩散(ETEST)对从患有和不患有囊性纤维化的人身上分离的BCC生物的性能。结果表明,左氧氟沙星、美罗培南、米诺环素和甲氧苄啶磺胺甲恶唑的肉汤微量稀释重现性是可接受的,而头孢他啶刚好低于可接受的截止值。无论样品来源如何,圆盘扩散,琼脂稀释和ETEST的结果与肉汤微量稀释无关。基于这些发现,我们建议不应常规对BCC进行抗菌药敏试验,如果提供者要求,只应按照临床和实验室标准协会的指南使用肉汤微量稀释。提供者应该意识到BCC的抗菌药敏试验方法的显著局限性。
{"title":"Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for <i>Burkholderia cepacia</i> complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis.","authors":"Peter Jorth, Carmila Manuel, Tracey McLemore, Romney M Humphries, Nicolynn C Cole, Audrey N Schuetz, Dennis Garica, Maria Maldonado, Natasha Rivero, Anna Clara Milesi Galdino, Diana Celedonio, John J LiPuma, Daniel A Green, James E A Zlosnik, Maria Traczewski, Holly K Huse","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01480-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01480-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Burkholderia cepacia</i> complex (BCC) is a group of Gram-negative bacteria that cause opportunistic infections, most notably in people with cystic fibrosis (CF), and have been associated with outbreaks caused by contaminated medical products. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often used to guide treatment for BCC infections, perhaps most importantly in people with CF who are being considered for lung transplant. However, recent studies have highlighted problems with AST methods. Here, we address limitations from previous studies to further evaluate BCC AST methods. We assessed the performance of reference broth microdilution (BMD), disk diffusion (DD) using Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) from three manufacturers, agar dilution (AD), and gradient diffusion (ETEST) for ceftazidime (CAZ), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEM), minocycline (MIN), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on a set of 205 BCC isolates. The isolate set included 100 isolates from people with CF and 105 isolates from people without CF from a variety of sources, which enabled us to systematically evaluate whether specimen source impacts AST performance. For all BCC isolates, BMD reproducibility was 93%, 98%, 99%, 98%, and 96% for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX, respectively. Using BMD as the comparator method, we show that DD, AD, and ETEST perform poorly, with neither MHA manufacturer nor specimen source significantly impacting method performance. Based on our data, we recommend that routine AST should not be performed for BCC isolates. If a provider requests AST, clinical microbiology laboratories should perform Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference methodology for BMD (stored frozen) and report MIC only.IMPORTANCEAntimicrobial susceptibility testing for the <i>Burkholderia cepacia</i> complex (BCC) is often used to determine eligibility for lung transplant in people with cystic fibrosis. However, problems with method performance have been reported. Here, we systematically evaluate the performance of reference broth microdilution, disk diffusion, agar dilution, and gradient diffusion (ETEST) for BCC organisms isolated from people with and without cystic fibrosis. We show that broth microdilution reproducibility is acceptable for levofloxacin, meropenem, minocycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, while ceftazidime was just below the acceptability cut-off. Regardless of specimen source, the results from disk diffusion, agar dilution, and ETEST do not correlate with broth microdilution. Based on these findings, we recommend that antimicrobial susceptibility testing should not be routinely performed for BCC, and if requested by the provider, only broth microdilution following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines should be used. Providers should be aware of the significant limitations of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for BCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0148024"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837569/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High-sensitivity detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in tongue swab samples. 舌拭子结核分枝杆菌DNA的高灵敏度检测。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01140-24
Alaina M Olson, Rachel C Wood, Kris M Weigel, Alexander J Yan, Katherine A Lochner, Rane B Dragovich, Angelique K Luabeya, Paul Yager, Mark Hatherill, Gerard A Cangelosi

Tongue swab (TS) sampling combined with quantitative PCR (qPCR) to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) DNA is a promising alternative to sputum testing for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. In prior studies, the sensitivity of tongue swabbing has usually been lower than sputum. In this study, we evaluated two strategies to improve sensitivity. In one, centrifugation was used to concentrate tongue dorsum bacteria from 2-mL suspensions eluted from high-capacity foam swab samples. The pellets were resuspended as 500-µL suspensions, and then mechanically lysed prior to dual-target qPCR to detect MTB insertion elements IS6110 and IS1081. Fractionation experiments demonstrated that most of the MTB DNA signal in clinical swab samples (99.22% ± 1.46%) was present in the sedimentable fraction. When applied to archived foam swabs collected from 124 South Africans with presumptive TB, this strategy exhibited 83% sensitivity (71/86) and 100% specificity (38/38) relative to sputum microbiological reference standard (MRS; sputum culture and/or Xpert Ultra). The second strategy used sequence-specific magnetic capture (SSMaC) to concentrate DNA released from MTB cells. This protocol was evaluated on archived Copan FLOQSwabs flocked swab samples collected from 128 South African participants with presumptive TB. Material eluted into 500 µL buffer was mechanically lysed. The suspensions were digested by proteinase K, hybridized to biotinylated dual-target oligonucleotide probes, and then concentrated ~20-fold using magnetic separation. Upon dual-target qPCR testing of concentrates, this strategy exhibited 90% sensitivity (83/92) and 97% specificity (35/36) relative to sputum MRS. These results point the way toward automatable, high-sensitivity methods for detecting MTB DNA in TS.

Importance: Improved testing for tuberculosis (TB) is needed. Using a more accessible sample type than sputum may enable the detection of more cases, but it is critical that alternative samples be tested appropriately. Here, we describe two new, highly accurate methods for testing tongue swabs for TB DNA.

舌拭子(TS)取样结合定量PCR (qPCR)检测结核分枝杆菌(MTB) DNA是一种有前景的替代痰液检测结核病(TB)诊断方法。在以往的研究中,舌拭的敏感性通常低于痰液。在本研究中,我们评估了两种提高敏感性的策略。其中一种方法是从高容量泡沫拭子样品中洗脱的2毫升悬浮液中离心浓缩舌背细菌。将微球重悬为500µL悬液,然后进行机械裂解,然后进行双目标qPCR检测MTB插入元件IS6110和IS1081。分离实验表明,临床拭子样本中大部分MTB DNA信号(99.22%±1.46%)存在于可沉积部分。当应用于从124名南非推定结核病患者收集的存档泡沫拭子时,该策略相对于痰微生物参考标准(MRS;痰培养和/或Xpert Ultra)。第二种策略使用序列特异性磁捕获(SSMaC)来浓缩从结核分枝杆菌细胞释放的DNA。对从128名推定患有结核病的南非参与者收集的Copan FLOQSwabs存档棉签样本对该方案进行了评估。材料洗脱到500µL缓冲液中进行机械裂解。用蛋白酶K消化,杂交到生物素化的双靶点寡核苷酸探针上,然后用磁分离浓缩~20倍。在浓缩物的双目标qPCR检测中,该策略相对于痰mrs显示出90%的灵敏度(83/92)和97%的特异性(35/36)。这些结果为ts中检测MTB DNA的自动化、高灵敏度方法指明了方向。使用比痰液更容易获得的样本类型可能能够发现更多病例,但至关重要的是对替代样本进行适当检测。在这里,我们描述了两种新的、高度准确的检测舌拭子结核DNA的方法。
{"title":"High-sensitivity detection of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> DNA in tongue swab samples.","authors":"Alaina M Olson, Rachel C Wood, Kris M Weigel, Alexander J Yan, Katherine A Lochner, Rane B Dragovich, Angelique K Luabeya, Paul Yager, Mark Hatherill, Gerard A Cangelosi","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01140-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01140-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tongue swab (TS) sampling combined with quantitative PCR (qPCR) to detect <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (MTB) DNA is a promising alternative to sputum testing for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. In prior studies, the sensitivity of tongue swabbing has usually been lower than sputum. In this study, we evaluated two strategies to improve sensitivity. In one, centrifugation was used to concentrate tongue dorsum bacteria from 2-mL suspensions eluted from high-capacity foam swab samples. The pellets were resuspended as 500-µL suspensions, and then mechanically lysed prior to dual-target qPCR to detect MTB insertion elements IS<i>6110</i> and IS<i>1081</i>. Fractionation experiments demonstrated that most of the MTB DNA signal in clinical swab samples (99.22% ± 1.46%) was present in the sedimentable fraction. When applied to archived foam swabs collected from 124 South Africans with presumptive TB, this strategy exhibited 83% sensitivity (71/86) and 100% specificity (38/38) relative to sputum microbiological reference standard (MRS; sputum culture and/or Xpert Ultra). The second strategy used sequence-specific magnetic capture (SSMaC) to concentrate DNA released from MTB cells. This protocol was evaluated on archived Copan FLOQSwabs flocked swab samples collected from 128 South African participants with presumptive TB. Material eluted into 500 µL buffer was mechanically lysed. The suspensions were digested by proteinase K, hybridized to biotinylated dual-target oligonucleotide probes, and then concentrated ~20-fold using magnetic separation. Upon dual-target qPCR testing of concentrates, this strategy exhibited 90% sensitivity (83/92) and 97% specificity (35/36) relative to sputum MRS. These results point the way toward automatable, high-sensitivity methods for detecting MTB DNA in TS.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Improved testing for tuberculosis (TB) is needed. Using a more accessible sample type than sputum may enable the detection of more cases, but it is critical that alternative samples be tested appropriately. Here, we describe two new, highly accurate methods for testing tongue swabs for TB DNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0114024"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837540/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142915153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effective mitigation of blood culture bottle shortage with diagnostic stewardship interventions.
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01701-24
Jessica Hudson, Guillermo Rodriguez Nava, Mindy Marie Sampson, Amy Chang, Alex Maurice Dussaq, Jorge Luis Salinas, Angela Serbest, Tho Pham, Niaz Banaei
{"title":"Effective mitigation of blood culture bottle shortage with diagnostic stewardship interventions.","authors":"Jessica Hudson, Guillermo Rodriguez Nava, Mindy Marie Sampson, Amy Chang, Alex Maurice Dussaq, Jorge Luis Salinas, Angela Serbest, Tho Pham, Niaz Banaei","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01701-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01701-24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0170124"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837545/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143032839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of piperacillin-tazobactam disks using contemporary Enterobacterales isolates suggests the need for disk potency optimization. 使用当代肠杆菌分离株对哌拉西林-他唑巴坦片进行评价,提示需要优化片效价。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01599-24
Ayesha Khan, Carmila Manuel, Richard Maynard, Romney M Humphries
<p><p>Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) is a commonly used broad-spectrum agent. OXA-1 β-lactamases drive global Enterobacterales TZP resistance and raise MICs to the clinical breakpoints (8/4-16/4 µg/mL), making susceptibility testing challenging. Two TZP disks are used globally. The first with 100 µg piperacillin and 10 µg tazobactam, established in 1992, is used by laboratories following U.S. FDA and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards. The second, with 30 µg piperacillin and 6 µg tazobactam, was developed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). When CLSI updated Enterobacterales TZP MIC breakpoints in 2022, it became apparent that the 100/10 µg disk may not accurately predict TZP resistance or susceptibility. In this study, we performed a disk mass titration study using 100 contemporary Enterobacterales isolates, including 40 harboring bla<sub>OXA-1</sub>. Relative to reference broth microdilution with CLSI breakpoints, categorical agreement (CA) for the 100/10 µg disk was 68% with 0.6% major errors (MEs) and 32% minor errors. The CA for the 30/6 µg disk against EUCAST breakpoints was 88% with 15% very major errors and 10% ME. A third disk developed in this study, 20/5 µg, yielded 81% CA with CLSI MIC breakpoints and disk breakpoints generated using the error-rate-bounded method. CA was 62.4%, 63.2%, and 70.9% for isolates with bla<sub>OXA-1</sub> using the 100/10, 30/6, and 20/5 µg disks, respectively, whereas it was 71.6%, 86.9%, and 83.1% for isolates without bla<sub>OXA-1</sub>. Decreasing TZP disk potency improved the overall performance of disk diffusion and improved separation between susceptible and non-susceptible isolates, particularly those harboring OXA-1, but no disk yielded optimal results.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>In this article, we address major gaps in contemporary data for piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) susceptibility testing and evaluate the performance of disk diffusion. TZP is the most common empiric broad-spectrum agent against Gram-negative pathogens and is used as a carbapenem-sparing regimen. OXA-1 β-lactamases drive global Enterobacterales TZP resistance and raise MICs to the clinical breakpoints, making susceptibility testing challenging. In 2022, CLSI revised the Enterobacterales TZP MIC breakpoints. Due to the lack of contemporary correlates, disk diffusion breakpoints were revised using outdated historical data from 1991 and 2003 and yielded unacceptable error rates. Additionally, there is a lack of global consensus on disk potency. The EUCAST TZP disks contain 30 μg piperacillin and 6 μg tazobactam. The CLSI disks, established after TZP approval in 1979 and prior to the widespread prevalence of ESBLs, contain 100 μg piperacillin and 10 μg tazobactam. Here, we evaluate disk diffusion using the 100/10 and 30/6 μg TZP disks with 100 contemporary Enterobacterales isolates, including 40 harboring bla<sub>OXA-1</sub>. We conducted a disk development st
哌拉西林-他唑巴坦是一种常用的广谱药物。OXA-1 β-内酰胺酶驱动肠杆菌对TZP的全球耐药性,并将mic提高到临床临界点(8/4-16/4µg/mL),使药敏试验具有挑战性。全局使用两个TZP磁盘。第一个含有100微克哌拉西林和10微克他唑巴坦,成立于1992年,由实验室按照美国FDA和临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)标准使用。第二种是由欧洲抗微生物药敏试验委员会(EUCAST)开发的,含有30µg哌拉西林和6µg他唑巴坦。当CLSI在2022年更新肠杆菌TZP MIC断点时,很明显100/10µg磁盘可能无法准确预测TZP耐药性或敏感性。在这项研究中,我们对100株当代肠杆菌进行了圆盘质量滴定研究,其中包括40株携带blaOXA-1。相对于具有CLSI断点的参考微量肉汤稀释,100/10µg磁盘的分类一致性(CA)为68%,主要误差(MEs)为0.6%,次要误差为32%。30/6µg磁盘对EUCAST断点的CA为88%,其中15%为非常严重错误,10%为ME。在本研究中开发的第三个磁盘,20/5µg,产生81%的CA与CLSI MIC断点和磁盘断点产生使用错误率有限的方法。在100/10、30/6和20/5µg培养皿中,含有blaOXA-1的分离株CA分别为62.4%、63.2%和70.9%,而不含blaOXA-1的分离株CA分别为71.6%、86.9%和83.1%。降低TZP的药盘效力提高了药盘扩散的整体性能,并改善了敏感和非敏感菌株之间的分离,特别是那些携带OXA-1的菌株,但没有任何药盘产生最佳结果。重要性:在本文中,我们解决了哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(piperacillin-tazobactam, TZP)敏感性测试的主要数据缺口,并评估了磁盘扩散的性能。TZP是抗革兰氏阴性病原体最常见的经验性广谱药物,被用作碳青霉烯节约方案。OXA-1 β-内酰胺酶驱动全球肠杆菌对TZP的耐药性,并将mic提高到临床突破点,使药敏试验具有挑战性。2022年,CLSI修订了Enterobacterales TZP MIC断点。由于缺乏当代相关性,使用1991年和2003年的过时历史数据修改磁盘扩散断点,产生了不可接受的错误率。此外,对磁盘效能缺乏全球共识。EUCAST TZP片含有30 μg哌拉西林和6 μg他唑巴坦。CLSI磁盘是在1979年TZP批准后,ESBLs广泛流行之前建立的,含有100 μg哌拉西林和10 μg他唑巴坦。在这里,我们使用100/10和30/6 μg TZP磁盘对100株当代肠杆菌进行了扩散评估,其中包括40株携带blaOXA-1的菌株。我们进行了一项磁盘开发研究,以确定替代效价是否可以解决TZP药敏试验的准确性问题。我们发现,降低TZP效价可以提高磁盘扩散的性能,并改善敏感和非敏感菌株之间的分离,特别是那些携带OXA-1的菌株,但没有磁盘产生最佳结果。在CLSI - MIC断点上,20/5 μg的筛选结果误差最小,对blaOXA-1敏感菌株和携带blaOXA-1的菌株分离效果最好。我们的研究解决了一个未满足的需求,表明进一步优化TZP磁盘效力是可能的,并为临床实验室提供了更好地了解使用当代具有挑战性的分离物的TZP磁盘的性能。需要一个更大的、多中心的研究来进一步优化,但由于缺乏资金用于非专利抗菌药物,研究受到了限制。我们在获得资金方面的困难凸显了AST对使用较久但大量使用的抗菌素的常见挑战。
{"title":"Evaluation of piperacillin-tazobactam disks using contemporary Enterobacterales isolates suggests the need for disk potency optimization.","authors":"Ayesha Khan, Carmila Manuel, Richard Maynard, Romney M Humphries","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01599-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01599-24","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) is a commonly used broad-spectrum agent. OXA-1 β-lactamases drive global Enterobacterales TZP resistance and raise MICs to the clinical breakpoints (8/4-16/4 µg/mL), making susceptibility testing challenging. Two TZP disks are used globally. The first with 100 µg piperacillin and 10 µg tazobactam, established in 1992, is used by laboratories following U.S. FDA and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards. The second, with 30 µg piperacillin and 6 µg tazobactam, was developed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). When CLSI updated Enterobacterales TZP MIC breakpoints in 2022, it became apparent that the 100/10 µg disk may not accurately predict TZP resistance or susceptibility. In this study, we performed a disk mass titration study using 100 contemporary Enterobacterales isolates, including 40 harboring bla&lt;sub&gt;OXA-1&lt;/sub&gt;. Relative to reference broth microdilution with CLSI breakpoints, categorical agreement (CA) for the 100/10 µg disk was 68% with 0.6% major errors (MEs) and 32% minor errors. The CA for the 30/6 µg disk against EUCAST breakpoints was 88% with 15% very major errors and 10% ME. A third disk developed in this study, 20/5 µg, yielded 81% CA with CLSI MIC breakpoints and disk breakpoints generated using the error-rate-bounded method. CA was 62.4%, 63.2%, and 70.9% for isolates with bla&lt;sub&gt;OXA-1&lt;/sub&gt; using the 100/10, 30/6, and 20/5 µg disks, respectively, whereas it was 71.6%, 86.9%, and 83.1% for isolates without bla&lt;sub&gt;OXA-1&lt;/sub&gt;. Decreasing TZP disk potency improved the overall performance of disk diffusion and improved separation between susceptible and non-susceptible isolates, particularly those harboring OXA-1, but no disk yielded optimal results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this article, we address major gaps in contemporary data for piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) susceptibility testing and evaluate the performance of disk diffusion. TZP is the most common empiric broad-spectrum agent against Gram-negative pathogens and is used as a carbapenem-sparing regimen. OXA-1 β-lactamases drive global Enterobacterales TZP resistance and raise MICs to the clinical breakpoints, making susceptibility testing challenging. In 2022, CLSI revised the Enterobacterales TZP MIC breakpoints. Due to the lack of contemporary correlates, disk diffusion breakpoints were revised using outdated historical data from 1991 and 2003 and yielded unacceptable error rates. Additionally, there is a lack of global consensus on disk potency. The EUCAST TZP disks contain 30 μg piperacillin and 6 μg tazobactam. The CLSI disks, established after TZP approval in 1979 and prior to the widespread prevalence of ESBLs, contain 100 μg piperacillin and 10 μg tazobactam. Here, we evaluate disk diffusion using the 100/10 and 30/6 μg TZP disks with 100 contemporary Enterobacterales isolates, including 40 harboring bla&lt;sub&gt;OXA-1&lt;/sub&gt;. We conducted a disk development st","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0159924"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837518/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142949682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility of pneumococci based on whole-genome sequencing data: a direct comparison of two genomic tools to conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 基于全基因组测序数据的肺炎球菌抗菌药物敏感性预测:两种基因组工具与常规抗菌药物敏感性测试的直接比较
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01079-24
Gerardo J Sanchez, Lize Cuypers, Lies Laenen, Peter Májek, Katrien Lagrou, Stefanie Desmet

Determination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in pneumococcal isolates is important for surveillance purposes and in a clinical context. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of pneumococci is complicated by the need for exact minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of beta-lactam antibiotics. Two next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis tools have implemented the prediction of AMR in their analysis workflow, including the prediction of MICs: Pathogenwatch (https://pathogen.watch/) and AREScloud (OpGen). The performance of these tools in comparison to phenotypic AST following EUCAST guidelines is unknown. A total of 538 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates were used to compare both tools with phenotypic AST for penicillin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime/ceftriaxone, erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline. Disk diffusion was performed for all isolates, and broth microdilution was performed for isolates with reduced beta-lactam susceptibility. Demultiplexed FASTQ files from Illumina sequencing, covering the whole genome of pneumococci, were used as input for the NGS tools. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) rates were calculated. For beta-lactam antibiotics, CA was high (>94%) associated with none or only one ME and VME (<1%). For erythromycin and tetracycline, CA was >93% for predictions by AREScloud, while for Pathogenwatch, this ranged around 88%. For trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, CA was for both tools <86%. High VME rates were observed for erythromycin and tetracycline, higher for Pathogenwatch (53.6% and 47.0%, respectively) compared to AREScloud (14.3% and 19.1%, respectively). Both tools performed excellently despite the complexity of predicting beta-lactam resistance in pneumococci. Further optimization and validation are needed for non-beta-lactams since high (very) major error rates were observed.

测定肺炎球菌分离株的抗菌素耐药性(AMR)对于监测目的和临床环境都很重要。肺炎球菌的抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)由于需要精确的β -内酰胺类抗生素的最低抑制浓度(mic)而变得复杂。两种下一代测序(NGS)分析工具已经在其分析工作流程中实现了AMR的预测,包括mic的预测:Pathogenwatch (https://pathogen.watch/)和AREScloud (OpGen)。与遵循EUCAST指南的表现型AST相比,这些工具的性能尚不清楚。总共538株肺炎链球菌分离株用于比较这两种工具与表型AST对青霉素、阿莫西林、头孢噻肟/头孢曲松、红霉素、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑和四环素的影响。对所有分离株进行圆盘扩散,对β -内酰胺敏感性降低的分离株进行肉汤微稀释。来自Illumina测序的解复用FASTQ文件,覆盖肺炎球菌的整个基因组,被用作NGS工具的输入。计算绝对一致率(CA)、严重错误率(ME)和非常严重错误率(VME)。对于β -内酰胺类抗生素,CA高(>94%)与无或仅与一种ME和VME相关(AREScloud预测为93%,而Pathogenwatch预测为88%左右)。对于甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑,两种工具的CA均为
{"title":"Prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility of pneumococci based on whole-genome sequencing data: a direct comparison of two genomic tools to conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing.","authors":"Gerardo J Sanchez, Lize Cuypers, Lies Laenen, Peter Májek, Katrien Lagrou, Stefanie Desmet","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01079-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01079-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in pneumococcal isolates is important for surveillance purposes and in a clinical context. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of pneumococci is complicated by the need for exact minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of beta-lactam antibiotics. Two next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis tools have implemented the prediction of AMR in their analysis workflow, including the prediction of MICs: Pathogenwatch (https://pathogen.watch/) and AREScloud (OpGen). The performance of these tools in comparison to phenotypic AST following EUCAST guidelines is unknown. A total of 538 <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> isolates were used to compare both tools with phenotypic AST for penicillin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime/ceftriaxone, erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline. Disk diffusion was performed for all isolates, and broth microdilution was performed for isolates with reduced beta-lactam susceptibility. Demultiplexed FASTQ files from Illumina sequencing, covering the whole genome of pneumococci, were used as input for the NGS tools. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) rates were calculated. For beta-lactam antibiotics, CA was high (>94%) associated with none or only one ME and VME (<1%). For erythromycin and tetracycline, CA was >93% for predictions by AREScloud, while for Pathogenwatch, this ranged around 88%. For trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, CA was for both tools <86%. High VME rates were observed for erythromycin and tetracycline, higher for Pathogenwatch (53.6% and 47.0%, respectively) compared to AREScloud (14.3% and 19.1%, respectively). Both tools performed excellently despite the complexity of predicting beta-lactam resistance in pneumococci. Further optimization and validation are needed for non-beta-lactams since high (very) major error rates were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0107924"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837510/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142915184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of voriconazole to predict susceptibility and resistance to isavuconazole for Aspergillus fumigatus using CLSI methods and interpretive criteria. 采用 CLSI 方法和解释性标准,使用伏立康唑预测曲霉菌对异唑康唑的敏感性和耐药性。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01207-24
Marisa L Winkler, Paul R Rhomberg, Kelley A Fedler, Michael D Huband, Maura Karr, John H Kimbrough, Mariana Castanheira

Aspergillus fumigatus is a common cause of pulmonary and invasive mold infections among immunocompromised hosts. Mortality in immunocompromised hosts with invasive Aspergillus infections (IAI) has been reported to be as high as 80%. Therefore, appropriate therapy is essential in treating IAI. Both isavuconazole and voriconazole are first-line agents in treatment guidelines for IAI, but isavuconazole has favorable properties, often leading it to be preferred over voriconazole, given the lengthy duration of treatment. It is difficult to perform mold antifungal susceptibility testing, which often requires a reference lab and several weeks to determine results. Therefore, use of surrogate markers can be helpful to infer susceptibility when testing is not possible or delayed. We performed isavuconazole and voriconazole broth microdilution susceptibility testing by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method on a collection of 976 non-duplicate A. fumigatus isolates from a global surveillance program between 2017 and 2022. We found that voriconazole and isavuconazole have a very high essential agreement within two doubling dilutions at 99.9% and a categorical agreement of 92.7% with no very major errors, one major error (0.11%), and <10% minor errors. Many of the minor errors were in the setting of voriconazole testing at a MIC of 0.5 mg/L (susceptible) but isavuconazole at 2 mg/L (intermediate). Genetic analysis of cyp51 genes confirmed that isavuconazole and voriconazole susceptibility testing identified isolates with cyp51A and cyp51B mutations. Voriconazole can be used to predict the isavuconazole susceptibility testing result when A. fumigatus is tested by CLSI broth microdilution methodology.

烟曲霉是肺部和侵袭性霉菌感染的常见原因免疫功能低下的宿主。据报道,侵袭性曲霉感染(IAI)免疫功能低下宿主的死亡率高达80%。因此,适当的治疗是治疗IAI的关键。依沙乌康唑和伏立康唑都是IAI治疗指南中的一线药物,但依沙乌康唑具有良好的特性,考虑到治疗时间较长,往往优于伏立康唑。很难进行霉菌抗真菌敏感性测试,这通常需要参考实验室和几周的时间来确定结果。因此,当检测不可能或延迟时,使用替代标记有助于推断易感性。采用临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI)的方法,对2017年至2022年全球监测项目收集的976株烟曲霉非重复菌株进行isavuconazole和voriconazole肉汤微稀释药敏试验。我们发现伏立康唑和异戊康唑在两次加倍稀释中具有非常高的基本一致性,为99.9%,分类一致性为92.7%,没有非常严重的错误,一个主要错误(0.11%),并且cyp51基因证实异戊康唑和伏立康唑敏感性试验鉴定出cyp51A和cyp51B突变的分离株。采用CLSI肉汤微量稀释法检测烟曲霉时,伏立康唑可用于预测异唑康唑药敏试验结果。
{"title":"Use of voriconazole to predict susceptibility and resistance to isavuconazole for <i>Aspergillus fumigatus</i> using CLSI methods and interpretive criteria.","authors":"Marisa L Winkler, Paul R Rhomberg, Kelley A Fedler, Michael D Huband, Maura Karr, John H Kimbrough, Mariana Castanheira","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01207-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01207-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Aspergillus fumigatus</i> is a common cause of pulmonary and invasive mold infections among immunocompromised hosts. Mortality in immunocompromised hosts with invasive <i>Aspergillus</i> infections (IAI) has been reported to be as high as 80%. Therefore, appropriate therapy is essential in treating IAI. Both isavuconazole and voriconazole are first-line agents in treatment guidelines for IAI, but isavuconazole has favorable properties, often leading it to be preferred over voriconazole, given the lengthy duration of treatment. It is difficult to perform mold antifungal susceptibility testing, which often requires a reference lab and several weeks to determine results. Therefore, use of surrogate markers can be helpful to infer susceptibility when testing is not possible or delayed. We performed isavuconazole and voriconazole broth microdilution susceptibility testing by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method on a collection of 976 non-duplicate <i>A. fumigatus</i> isolates from a global surveillance program between 2017 and 2022. We found that voriconazole and isavuconazole have a very high essential agreement within two doubling dilutions at 99.9% and a categorical agreement of 92.7% with no very major errors, one major error (0.11%), and <10% minor errors. Many of the minor errors were in the setting of voriconazole testing at a MIC of 0.5 mg/L (susceptible) but isavuconazole at 2 mg/L (intermediate). Genetic analysis of <i>cyp51</i> genes confirmed that isavuconazole and voriconazole susceptibility testing identified isolates with <i>cyp51A</i> and <i>cyp51B</i> mutations. Voriconazole can be used to predict the isavuconazole susceptibility testing result when <i>A. fumigatus</i> is tested by CLSI broth microdilution methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0120724"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837495/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative performances of the Qvella FAST system and conventional methods for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing on monomicrobial positive blood cultures. Qvella FAST系统与传统单菌阳性血培养快速鉴定及药敏试验方法的比较
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01332-24
Malo Penven, Manon Louazon, Charlotte Freret, Alexandra Sauron, Meghane Pilard, Elisa Creignou, Ophélie Gardan, Maryne Haumont, Asma Zouari, Stéphane Lorre, Vincent Cattoir

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of sepsis is of paramount importance to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. The Qvella FAST System is a new instrument that concentrates and purifies bacteria from positive-flagged blood culture bottles (PFBCBs) to produce a "liquid" colony comparable to a subcultured colony in less than 40 min for rapid ID and calibrated antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). In this study, we evaluated performances of the FAST System workflow and our rapid routine manual workflow (bacterial pellet obtained after lysis, cleaning, washing, and centrifugation for ID; AST by disc diffusion by direct inoculation after dilution) by comparison to the reference method based on 24-h bacterial subcultures. Two panels of PFBCBs were studied: panel A (including 107 prospective BCs from septic patients, October-November 2022) and panel B (including 102 BCs spiked with difficult-to-identify bacteria [mostly streptococci] and multidrug-resistant isolates), resulting in a total of 209 evaluable samples. The FAST System provided a correct ID to the species level in 178/209 (85.2%) of cases. For AST, the categorical agreement (CA) of the FAST System was 99.4%, with rates of very major (VME), major (ME), and minor (mE) errors of 0.59%, 0.20%, and 0.26%, respectively. Our rapid routine workflow based on manual methods show similar results for ID (86.2%) and AST (CA, 99.6%; VME, 0.50%; ME, 0.16%; mE, 0.13%). In conclusion, the Qvella FAST system, a promising tool that can reduce diagnostic time by approximately 1 day, shows excellent performances for rapid ID and AST.

快速和准确的诊断败血症是至关重要的,以减少相关的发病率和死亡率。Qvella FAST系统是一种新型仪器,可浓缩和纯化阳性标记血培养瓶(PFBCBs)中的细菌,在不到40分钟的时间内产生与传代培养菌落相当的“液体”菌落,用于快速鉴定和校准抗生素敏感性试验(AST)。在这项研究中,我们评估了FAST系统工作流程的性能和我们快速的常规人工工作流程(裂解、清洗、洗涤和离心后获得细菌颗粒进行ID;用碟扩散法(稀释后直接接种法)与对照法进行24h细菌传代培养的比较。研究了两组pfbcb: A组(包括来自感染性疾病患者的107个预期bc, 2022年10月至11月)和B组(包括102个bc,其中添加了难以识别的细菌[主要是链球菌]和耐多药分离株),共获得209个可评估样本。在178/209例(85.2%)病例中,FAST系统对物种水平的识别率是正确的。AST的分类一致性(CA)为99.4%,非常严重(VME)、严重(ME)和轻微(ME)的错误率分别为0.59%、0.20%和0.26%。基于人工方法的快速常规工作流程显示ID(86.2%)和AST (CA, 99.6%)的结果相似;VME, 0.50%;我,0.16%;我,0.13%)。总之,Qvella FAST系统是一种很有前景的工具,可以将诊断时间缩短约1天,在快速ID和AST方面表现出色。
{"title":"Comparative performances of the Qvella FAST system and conventional methods for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing on monomicrobial positive blood cultures.","authors":"Malo Penven, Manon Louazon, Charlotte Freret, Alexandra Sauron, Meghane Pilard, Elisa Creignou, Ophélie Gardan, Maryne Haumont, Asma Zouari, Stéphane Lorre, Vincent Cattoir","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01332-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01332-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid and accurate diagnosis of sepsis is of paramount importance to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. The Qvella FAST System is a new instrument that concentrates and purifies bacteria from positive-flagged blood culture bottles (PFBCBs) to produce a \"liquid\" colony comparable to a subcultured colony in less than 40 min for rapid ID and calibrated antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). In this study, we evaluated performances of the FAST System workflow and our rapid routine manual workflow (bacterial pellet obtained after lysis, cleaning, washing, and centrifugation for ID; AST by disc diffusion by direct inoculation after dilution) by comparison to the reference method based on 24-h bacterial subcultures. Two panels of PFBCBs were studied: panel A (including 107 prospective BCs from septic patients, October-November 2022) and panel B (including 102 BCs spiked with difficult-to-identify bacteria [mostly streptococci] and multidrug-resistant isolates), resulting in a total of 209 evaluable samples. The FAST System provided a correct ID to the species level in 178/209 (85.2%) of cases. For AST, the categorical agreement (CA) of the FAST System was 99.4%, with rates of very major (VME), major (ME), and minor (mE) errors of 0.59%, 0.20%, and 0.26%, respectively. Our rapid routine workflow based on manual methods show similar results for ID (86.2%) and AST (CA, 99.6%; VME, 0.50%; ME, 0.16%; mE, 0.13%). In conclusion, the Qvella FAST system, a promising tool that can reduce diagnostic time by approximately 1 day, shows excellent performances for rapid ID and AST.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0133224"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel technologies for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections. 尿路感染诊断的新技术。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00306-24
Tomas Bermudez, Jonathan E Schmitz, Malcolm Boswell, Romney Humphries

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) impose a substantial burden on patient quality of life and urine testing accounts for the majority of workload in many clinical microbiology laboratories. Traditional UTI diagnosis relies on symptoms, urinalysis, and culture which are interpreted based on historical guidelines. This approach, while foundational, presents limitations, particularly in complex cases. Low-level bacteriuria and the presence of fastidious organisms are often overlooked or entirely missed in standard urine culture, stressing the need for novel diagnostic methods and technologies. This mini-review summarizes the existing state of UTI diagnostics in 2024 and covers current and upcoming technologies including rapid molecular-based pathogen identification, next-generation sequencing, and advanced antimicrobial susceptibility testing. However, these methods represent unique challenges, and as they are implemented, they will require the field to adapt to new concepts to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment.

尿路感染(uti)对患者的生活质量造成了巨大的负担,尿液检测占许多临床微生物实验室工作量的大部分。传统的尿路感染诊断依赖于症状、尿液分析和培养,这些都是根据历史指南来解释的。这种方法虽然是基础的,但存在局限性,特别是在复杂的情况下。在标准尿液培养中,低水平细菌尿和挑剔生物的存在经常被忽视或完全遗漏,强调需要新的诊断方法和技术。这篇综述总结了2024年尿路感染诊断的现状,涵盖了当前和未来的技术,包括快速分子病原体鉴定、下一代测序和先进的抗菌药物敏感性检测。然而,这些方法代表着独特的挑战,并且随着它们的实施,它们将要求该领域适应新的概念,以避免误诊和过度治疗。
{"title":"Novel technologies for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections.","authors":"Tomas Bermudez, Jonathan E Schmitz, Malcolm Boswell, Romney Humphries","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00306-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00306-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) impose a substantial burden on patient quality of life and urine testing accounts for the majority of workload in many clinical microbiology laboratories. Traditional UTI diagnosis relies on symptoms, urinalysis, and culture which are interpreted based on historical guidelines. This approach, while foundational, presents limitations, particularly in complex cases. Low-level bacteriuria and the presence of fastidious organisms are often overlooked or entirely missed in standard urine culture, stressing the need for novel diagnostic methods and technologies. This mini-review summarizes the existing state of UTI diagnostics in 2024 and covers current and upcoming technologies including rapid molecular-based pathogen identification, next-generation sequencing, and advanced antimicrobial susceptibility testing. However, these methods represent unique challenges, and as they are implemented, they will require the field to adapt to new concepts to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0030624"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142931893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rapidly spreading Enterobacterales with OXA-48-like carbapenemases. 具有oxa -48样碳青霉烯酶的快速扩散肠杆菌。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01515-24
Gisele Peirano, Johann D D Pitout

Enterobacterales (mostly Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli) with OXA-48-like carbapenemases (e.g., OXA-48, -181, -232, -244) are undermining the global efficiency of carbapenem therapy. In the Middle East, North Africa, and some European countries, OXA-48-like carbapenemases are the most common types of carbapenemases among Enterobacterales. Currently, OXA-48 is endemic in the Middle East, North Africa, Spain, France, and Belgium; OXA-181 is endemic in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian Subcontinent, while OXA-232 has been increasing in the Indian Subcontinent. European countries (e.g., Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, France) are experiencing community outbreaks with E. coli ST38 that produce OXA-244, and these strains have been introduced into Norwegian, Polish, and Czech hospitals. The global ascendancy of OXA-48-like genes is due to the combination of carbapenemases with horizontal spread through promiscuous plasmids (e.g., IncL, IncX3, ColE2) and vertical spread with certain high-risk multidrug-resistant clones (e.g., K. pneumoniae ST14, ST15, ST147, ST307; E. coli ST38, ST410). This is a powerful "gene survival strategy" that has assisted with the survival of OXA-48-like genes in different environments including the community setting. The laboratory diagnosis is complex; therefore, bacteria with "difficult to detect" variants (e.g., OXA-244, OXA-484) are likely underreported and are spreading silently "beneath the radar" in hospital and community settings. K. pneumoniae and E. coli with OXA-48-like carbapenemases are forces to be reckoned with.

具有OXA-48样碳青霉烯酶(例如,OXA-48, -181, -232, -244)的肠杆菌(主要是肺炎克雷伯菌,大肠杆菌)正在破坏碳青霉烯治疗的全球效率。在中东、北非和一些欧洲国家,oxa -48样碳青霉烯酶是肠杆菌中最常见的碳青霉烯酶类型。目前,OXA-48在中东、北非、西班牙、法国和比利时流行;OXA-181在撒哈拉以南非洲和印度次大陆流行,而OXA-232在印度次大陆呈上升趋势。欧洲国家(如德国、丹麦、瑞士和法国)正在经历产生OXA-244的ST38大肠杆菌社区暴发,这些菌株已被引入挪威、波兰和捷克的医院。oxa -48样基因的全球优势是由于碳青霉烯酶通过混杂质粒(如IncL、IncX3、ColE2)水平传播和某些高风险多药耐药克隆(如肺炎克雷布菌ST14、ST15、ST147、ST307;大肠杆菌ST38, ST410)。这是一种强大的“基因生存策略”,可以帮助oxa -48样基因在包括社区环境在内的不同环境中存活。实验室诊断复杂;因此,具有“难以检测”变种(例如OXA-244、OXA-484)的细菌可能被低估了,并且在医院和社区环境中“不为人知”地悄无声息地传播。具有oxa -48样碳青霉烯酶的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌是不可忽视的力量。
{"title":"Rapidly spreading <i>Enterobacterales</i> with OXA-48-like carbapenemases.","authors":"Gisele Peirano, Johann D D Pitout","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01515-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01515-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Enterobacterales</i> (mostly <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i>) with OXA-48-like carbapenemases (e.g., OXA-48, -181, -232, -244) are undermining the global efficiency of carbapenem therapy. In the Middle East, North Africa, and some European countries, OXA-48-like carbapenemases are the most common types of carbapenemases among <i>Enterobacterales</i>. Currently, OXA-48 is endemic in the Middle East, North Africa, Spain, France, and Belgium; OXA-181 is endemic in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian Subcontinent, while OXA-232 has been increasing in the Indian Subcontinent. European countries (e.g., Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, France) are experiencing community outbreaks with <i>E. coli</i> ST38 that produce OXA-244, and these strains have been introduced into Norwegian, Polish, and Czech hospitals. The global ascendancy of OXA-48-like genes is due to the combination of carbapenemases with horizontal spread through promiscuous plasmids (e.g., IncL, IncX3, ColE2) and vertical spread with certain high-risk multidrug-resistant clones (e.g., <i>K. pneumoniae</i> ST14, ST15, ST147, ST307; <i>E. coli</i> ST38, ST410). This is a powerful \"gene survival strategy\" that has assisted with the survival of OXA-48-like genes in different environments including the community setting. The laboratory diagnosis is complex; therefore, bacteria with \"difficult to detect\" variants (e.g., OXA-244, OXA-484) are likely underreported and are spreading silently \"beneath the radar\" in hospital and community settings. <i>K. pneumoniae</i> and <i>E. coli</i> with OXA-48-like carbapenemases are forces to be reckoned with.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0151524"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837536/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142931896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1