首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Microbiology最新文献

英文 中文
An immunoassay based on bioluminescent sensors for rapid detection of African swine fever virus antibodies. 基于生物发光传感器的免疫测定法,用于快速检测非洲猪瘟病毒抗体。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00463-24
Zhonghui Zhang, Jinming Wang, Qingli Niu, Guiquan Guan, Hong Yin, Jifei Yang

Serological assays for antibody detection have contributed significantly to the diagnosis and control of infectious diseases. African swine fever is the most devastating infectious disease of domestic pigs and wild boars, severely threatening the global pig industry in recent years. Here, we developed a rapid, simple, and sensitive immunoassay based on the split-luciferase system to detect IgG antibodies against African swine fever virus (ASFV). In this assay, the p30 protein of ASFV was genetically coupled to the LgBiT and SmBiT subunits of nanoluciferase, which were used as fusion probes for specific antibodies. Target engagement of the probes results in the reconstitution of a functional nanoluciferase, which further catalyzes bioluminescent reactions. Different orientations of the LgBiT and SmBiT-p30 fusion sensors were designed and investigated, and N-LgBiT/p30 and N-SmBiT/p30 were identified as a promising sensor pair for reforming active nanoluciferase in the presence of specific antibodies. After optimization, this split-luciferase complementation assay showed high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ASFV antibodies. The analytical sensitivity of the assay was 16 times greater than that of the blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) by the detection of serial dilutions of serum, and no cross-reaction was observed with other swine pathogens. As demonstrated in clinical samples, its performance is highly consistent with that of a commercial ELISA kit, with a concordance rate of 98.19%. This assay is simple and easy to perform, providing a more flexible and efficient approach for the measurement of ASFV antibodies in clinical applications.

Importance: The study is about a homogeneous split-luciferase assay for antibody detection. Split nanoluciferase biosensors for the detection of ASFV antibodies were designed. This sensor platform enables the sensitive and specific detection of antibodies. The split-luciferase assay is simple, rapid, and easy to use.

用于检测抗体的血清学检测方法为诊断和控制传染病做出了巨大贡献。非洲猪瘟是家猪和野猪中最具毁灭性的传染病,近年来严重威胁着全球养猪业。在此,我们开发了一种基于分裂荧光素酶系统的快速、简单、灵敏的免疫测定方法,用于检测非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)的 IgG 抗体。在这种检测方法中,ASFV 的 p30 蛋白与纳米荧光素酶的 LgBiT 和 SmBiT 亚基通过基因耦合,用作特异性抗体的融合探针。探针的靶向啮合导致功能性纳米荧光素酶的重组,从而进一步催化生物发光反应。我们设计并研究了 LgBiT 和 SmBiT-p30 融合探针的不同取向,并确定 N-LgBiT/p30 和 N-SmBiT/p30 是在特异性抗体存在下重组活性纳米荧光素酶的理想探针对。经过优化后,这种分裂荧光素酶互补测定在检测 ASFV 抗体方面显示出了高灵敏度和特异性。通过检测连续稀释的血清,该测定的分析灵敏度是阻断酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的 16 倍,而且没有观察到与其他猪病原体的交叉反应。在临床样本中证明,其性能与商业 ELISA 试剂盒高度一致,吻合率高达 98.19%。该检测方法简便易行,为临床应用中 ASFV 抗体的测定提供了一种更灵活、更有效的方法:重要意义:本研究涉及一种用于抗体检测的均相裂解荧光素酶测定法。该研究设计了用于检测 ASFV 抗体的分离式纳米荧光素酶生物传感器。该传感器平台能够灵敏、特异地检测抗体。分裂荧光素酶检测法简单、快速、易于使用。
{"title":"An immunoassay based on bioluminescent sensors for rapid detection of African swine fever virus antibodies.","authors":"Zhonghui Zhang, Jinming Wang, Qingli Niu, Guiquan Guan, Hong Yin, Jifei Yang","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00463-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00463-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serological assays for antibody detection have contributed significantly to the diagnosis and control of infectious diseases. African swine fever is the most devastating infectious disease of domestic pigs and wild boars, severely threatening the global pig industry in recent years. Here, we developed a rapid, simple, and sensitive immunoassay based on the split-luciferase system to detect IgG antibodies against African swine fever virus (ASFV). In this assay, the p30 protein of ASFV was genetically coupled to the LgBiT and SmBiT subunits of nanoluciferase, which were used as fusion probes for specific antibodies. Target engagement of the probes results in the reconstitution of a functional nanoluciferase, which further catalyzes bioluminescent reactions. Different orientations of the LgBiT and SmBiT-p30 fusion sensors were designed and investigated, and N-LgBiT/p30 and N-SmBiT/p30 were identified as a promising sensor pair for reforming active nanoluciferase in the presence of specific antibodies. After optimization, this split-luciferase complementation assay showed high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ASFV antibodies. The analytical sensitivity of the assay was 16 times greater than that of the blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) by the detection of serial dilutions of serum, and no cross-reaction was observed with other swine pathogens. As demonstrated in clinical samples, its performance is highly consistent with that of a commercial ELISA kit, with a concordance rate of 98.19%. This assay is simple and easy to perform, providing a more flexible and efficient approach for the measurement of ASFV antibodies in clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>The study is about a homogeneous split-luciferase assay for antibody detection. Split nanoluciferase biosensors for the detection of ASFV antibodies were designed. This sensor platform enables the sensitive and specific detection of antibodies. The split-luciferase assay is simple, rapid, and easy to use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0046324"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481549/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic performance of an automated robot for MALDI target preparation in microbial identification. 用于微生物鉴定的 MALDI 靶标制备自动机器人的诊断性能。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00434-24
Arthur B Pranada, Michal Cicatka, Clara Heß, Jan Karasek

The MBT Pathfinder is an automated colony-picking robot designed for efficient sample preparation in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. This article presents results from three key experiments evaluating the instrument's performance in conjunction with MALDI Biotyper instrument. The method comparison experiment assessed its clinical performance, demonstrating comparable results with gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria (scores larger than 2.00) and superior performance over simple direct yeast transfer (score: 1.80) when compared to samples prepared manually. The repeatability experiment confirmed consistent performance over multiple days and labs (average log score: 2.12, std. deviation: 0.59). The challenge panel experiment showcased its consistent and accurate performance across various samples and settings, yielding average scores between 1.76 and 2.19. These findings underline the MBT Pathfinder as a reliable and efficient tool for MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry sample preparation in clinical and research applications.

MBT Pathfinder 是一种自动菌落采摘机器人,专为基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱分析中的高效样品制备而设计。本文介绍了三项关键实验的结果,评估了该仪器与 MALDI Biotyper 仪器配合使用的性能。方法比较实验评估了仪器的临床性能,结果表明仪器对革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌和厌氧菌的检测结果相当(得分大于 2.00),与人工制备的样本相比,仪器的性能优于简单的直接酵母转移法(得分:1.80)。可重复性实验证实了该产品在多天和多个实验室中的性能始终如一(平均对数分数:2.12,标准偏差:0.59)。挑战小组实验展示了其在不同样本和设置下的一致和准确性能,平均得分介于 1.76 和 2.19 之间。这些研究结果表明,MBT Pathfinder 是用于临床和研究应用中 MALDI-TOF 质谱样品制备的可靠而高效的工具。
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of an automated robot for MALDI target preparation in microbial identification.","authors":"Arthur B Pranada, Michal Cicatka, Clara Heß, Jan Karasek","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00434-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00434-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The MBT Pathfinder is an automated colony-picking robot designed for efficient sample preparation in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. This article presents results from three key experiments evaluating the instrument's performance in conjunction with MALDI Biotyper instrument. The method comparison experiment assessed its clinical performance, demonstrating comparable results with gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria (scores larger than 2.00) and superior performance over simple direct yeast transfer (score: 1.80) when compared to samples prepared manually. The repeatability experiment confirmed consistent performance over multiple days and labs (average log score: 2.12, std. deviation: 0.59). The challenge panel experiment showcased its consistent and accurate performance across various samples and settings, yielding average scores between 1.76 and 2.19. These findings underline the MBT Pathfinder as a reliable and efficient tool for MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry sample preparation in clinical and research applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0043424"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481498/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142288393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, rifampicin and isoniazid resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria in a low-incidence setting. 评估 STANDARD M10 MDR-TB 和 MTB/NTM 检测试剂盒在低发病率环境中检测结核分枝杆菌、利福平和异烟肼耐药性以及非结核分枝杆菌的效果。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00402-24
Bruno Luukinen, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Silja Mentula, Anu Pätäri-Sampo

Rapid detection is crucial for tuberculosis (TB) control. GeneXpert (Cepheid) is a widely used PCR system, known for its simplicity, random access, and point-of-care compatibility. SD BIOSENSOR recently introduced a similar system, STANDARD M10, including a Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid resistance (herein, MDR-TB) assay and an MTB/nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) assay. We evaluated these assays for the potential to replace the established Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay in a low-TB incidence setting. We analyzed 160 clinical respiratory samples (45 MTB-positive and 35 NTM-positive) and further 24 drug-resistant MTB, 30 mycobacterial species (2 MTB, 28 NTM), and 37 non-mycobacterial isolates. Compared with culture, clinical sensitivities and specificities for MTB detection were 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.1-95.6%) and 97.4% (CI = 92.3-99.4%) with Xpert Ultra, 88.9% (95% CI = 76.1-95.6%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MDR-TB, and 84.4% (CI = 70.9-94.4%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MTB/NTM, respectively. For NTM detection, M10 MTB/NTM showed sensitivity and specificity of 65.7% (CI = 49.1-79.2%) and 96.8% (CI = 91.8-99.0%). Compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), sensitivity and specificity for detecting RIF resistance were 100% (CI = 77.3-100%) and 95.6% (CI = 84.4-99.6%) with Xpert Ultra, and 100% (CI = 74.9-100%) and 95.5% (CI = 84.0-99.6%) with M10 MDR-TB. M10 MDR-TB showed 92.3% sensitivity (CI = 74.7-99.0%) and 100% specificity (CI = 87.3-100%) for detecting isoniazid resistance. All discrepancies in DST by PCR were concordant with whole-genome sequencing. While M10 MDR-TB demonstrated great potential as an alternative to Xpert Ultra, M10 MTB/NTM had limitations in NTM screening. Additionally, the M10 sputum pretreatment did not inactivate MTB efficiently, which should be considered in process risk assessment.

Importance: The molecular diagnostic STANDARD M10 system is highly analogous to the widely established GeneXpert system, which significantly increases the relevance of this evaluation study in the field of rapid detection of M. tuberculosis. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical evaluation describing the performance of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays, including an extensive analytical specificity panel (inclusivity and exclusivity) for the detection of M. tuberculosis, drug resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria.

快速检测对结核病(TB)控制至关重要。GeneXpert(Cepheid)是一种广泛使用的 PCR 系统,以其简便、随机接入和床旁兼容性而著称。SD BIOSENSOR 最近推出了一款类似的系统 STANDARD M10,包括结核分枝杆菌(MTB)、利福平(RIF)和异烟肼耐药性(以下简称 MDR-TB)检测以及 MTB/非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)检测。我们评估了这些检测方法在低结核病发病率环境中取代现有 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 检测方法的潜力。我们分析了 160 份临床呼吸道样本(45 份 MTB 阳性,35 份 NTM 阳性),进一步分析了 24 份耐药 MTB、30 份分枝杆菌(2 份 MTB,28 份 NTM)和 37 份非分枝杆菌分离物。与培养法相比,使用 Xpert Ultra 检测 MTB 的临床灵敏度和特异性分别为 88.9%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 76.1-95.6% 和 97.4%(CI = 92.3-99.4%);使用 M10 MDR-TB 的临床灵敏度和特异性分别为 88.9%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 76.1-95.6% 和 98.3%(CI = 93.5-99.9%);使用 M10 MTB/NTM 的临床灵敏度和特异性分别为 84.4%(CI = 70.9-94.4%)和 98.3%(CI = 93.5-99.9%)。在检测 NTM 方面,M10 MTB/NTM 的敏感性和特异性分别为 65.7% (CI = 49.1-79.2%) 和 96.8% (CI = 91.8-99.0%)。与表型药敏试验(DST)相比,Xpert Ultra 检测 RIF 耐药性的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%(CI = 77.3-100%)和 95.6%(CI = 84.4-99.6%),M10 MDR-TB 检测 RIF 耐药性的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%(CI = 74.9-100%)和 95.5%(CI = 84.0-99.6%)。M10 MDR-TB 检测异烟肼耐药性的灵敏度为 92.3%(CI = 74.7-99.0%),特异性为 100%(CI = 87.3-100%)。PCR DST 的所有差异均与全基因组测序一致。虽然 M10 MDR-TB 作为 Xpert Ultra 的替代品表现出了巨大的潜力,但 M10 MTB/NTM 在非结核菌筛查方面仍有局限性。此外,M10 痰液预处理不能有效灭活 MTB,这一点应在流程风险评估中加以考虑:重要意义:分子诊断 STANDARD M10 系统与广泛使用的 GeneXpert 系统高度相似,这大大提高了本评估研究在结核杆菌快速检测领域的相关性。据我们所知,这是首次对 STANDARD M10 MDR-TB 和 MTB/NTM 检测方法的性能进行临床评估,包括检测结核杆菌、耐药性和非结核分枝杆菌的广泛分析特异性面板(包容性和排他性)。
{"title":"Evaluation of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays for the detection of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>, rifampicin and isoniazid resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria in a low-incidence setting.","authors":"Bruno Luukinen, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Silja Mentula, Anu Pätäri-Sampo","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00402-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00402-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid detection is crucial for tuberculosis (TB) control. GeneXpert (Cepheid) is a widely used PCR system, known for its simplicity, random access, and point-of-care compatibility. SD BIOSENSOR recently introduced a similar system, STANDARD M10, including a <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid resistance (herein, MDR-TB) assay and an MTB/nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) assay. We evaluated these assays for the potential to replace the established Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay in a low-TB incidence setting. We analyzed 160 clinical respiratory samples (45 MTB-positive and 35 NTM-positive) and further 24 drug-resistant MTB, 30 mycobacterial species (2 MTB, 28 NTM), and 37 non-mycobacterial isolates. Compared with culture, clinical sensitivities and specificities for MTB detection were 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.1-95.6%) and 97.4% (CI = 92.3-99.4%) with Xpert Ultra, 88.9% (95% CI = 76.1-95.6%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MDR-TB, and 84.4% (CI = 70.9-94.4%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MTB/NTM, respectively. For NTM detection, M10 MTB/NTM showed sensitivity and specificity of 65.7% (CI = 49.1-79.2%) and 96.8% (CI = 91.8-99.0%). Compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), sensitivity and specificity for detecting RIF resistance were 100% (CI = 77.3-100%) and 95.6% (CI = 84.4-99.6%) with Xpert Ultra, and 100% (CI = 74.9-100%) and 95.5% (CI = 84.0-99.6%) with M10 MDR-TB. M10 MDR-TB showed 92.3% sensitivity (CI = 74.7-99.0%) and 100% specificity (CI = 87.3-100%) for detecting isoniazid resistance. All discrepancies in DST by PCR were concordant with whole-genome sequencing. While M10 MDR-TB demonstrated great potential as an alternative to Xpert Ultra, M10 MTB/NTM had limitations in NTM screening. Additionally, the M10 sputum pretreatment did not inactivate MTB efficiently, which should be considered in process risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>The molecular diagnostic STANDARD M10 system is highly analogous to the widely established GeneXpert system, which significantly increases the relevance of this evaluation study in the field of rapid detection of <i>M. tuberculosis</i>. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical evaluation describing the performance of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays, including an extensive analytical specificity panel (inclusivity and exclusivity) for the detection of <i>M. tuberculosis</i>, drug resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0040224"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481502/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142288396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nanopore-based targeted sequencing test for direct tuberculosis identification, genotyping, and detection of drug resistance mutations: a side-by-side comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing technologies. 基于纳米孔的靶向测序测试,用于结核病的直接鉴定、基因分型和耐药性突变检测:靶向新一代测序技术的并行比较。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00815-24
Andrea Maurizio Cabibbe, Kiarash Moghaddasi, Virginia Batignani, Godstime Stephen Kojo Morgan, Federico Di Marco, Daniela Maria Cirillo

We investigated the performance of the targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS)-based Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics AmPORE TB assay, recently approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) as tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic test for the detection of drug resistance on respiratory specimens. A total of 104 DNA samples from Xpert MTB/RIF-positive TB sputum specimens were tested using the AmPORE TB kit, with the GenoScreen Deeplex Myc-TB as a comparative tNGS assay. For AmPORE TB, DNA samples were divided into five sequencing runs on the MinION device. Data analysis was performed using proprietary software. The WHO catalog of mutations was used for drug resistance interpretation. The assay achieved a high validity rate of 98% (102/104 DNA samples), homogeneous mean reads coverage across TB-positive specimens, and 100% positive and negative agreements for detecting mutations associated with resistance to rifampicin, pyrazinamide, fluoroquinolones, ethambutol, and capreomycin compared with Deeplex Myc-TB. The main discrepancies for the remaining drugs were attributable to the different assay panel designs. The AmPORE TB turnaround time was approximately 5-6 hours from extracted DNA to tNGS reporting for batches of 22 DNA samples. The AmPORE TB assay drastically reduced the time to tNGS reporting from days to hours and showed good performance for drug-resistant TB profiling compared with Deeplex Myc-TB.

Importance: Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis provides comprehensive resistance predictions matched to new multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis regimens and received World Health Organization approval for clinical use in respiratory samples in 2024. The advanced version of the Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics AmPORE TB tNGS kit was evaluated in this study for the first time and demonstrated good performance, flexibility, and faster turnaround time compared with the existing solutions.

我们研究了基于靶向新一代测序(tNGS)的牛津纳米孔诊断公司(Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics)AmPORE TB 检测试剂盒的性能,该试剂盒最近被世界卫生组织(WHO)批准为肺结核(TB)诊断试剂盒,用于检测呼吸道标本的耐药性。共有 104 份 Xpert MTB/RIF 阳性肺结核痰标本的 DNA 样本使用 AmPORE TB 试剂盒进行了检测,GenoScreen Deeplex Myc-TB 作为对比 tNGS 检测。对于 AmPORE TB,DNA 样本在 MinION 设备上分为五次测序。数据分析使用专有软件进行。世界卫生组织的突变目录用于耐药性解释。与 Deeplex Myc-TB 相比,该检测方法的有效率高达 98%(102/104 个 DNA 样本),结核菌阳性标本的平均读数覆盖率相同,在检测与利福平、吡嗪酰胺、氟喹诺酮类、乙胺丁醇和辣椒霉素耐药性相关的突变时,阳性和阴性一致率均为 100%。其余药物的主要差异可归因于不同的检测板设计。对于每批 22 份 DNA 样品,从提取 DNA 到 tNGS 报告,AmPORE TB 的周转时间约为 5-6 小时。与 Deeplex Myc-TB.Importance 相比,AmPORE TB 检测方法将 tNGS 报告时间从数天大幅缩短至数小时,并在耐药 TB 图谱分析方面表现出良好的性能:结核分枝杆菌的靶向新一代测序(tNGS)提供了与新型耐多药/耐利福平结核病治疗方案相匹配的全面耐药性预测,并获得了世界卫生组织的批准,可在 2024 年用于呼吸道样本的临床检测。本研究首次评估了牛津纳米孔诊断公司 AmPORE TB tNGS 试剂盒的高级版本,与现有解决方案相比,该试剂盒表现出良好的性能、灵活性和更快的周转时间。
{"title":"Nanopore-based targeted sequencing test for direct tuberculosis identification, genotyping, and detection of drug resistance mutations: a side-by-side comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing technologies.","authors":"Andrea Maurizio Cabibbe, Kiarash Moghaddasi, Virginia Batignani, Godstime Stephen Kojo Morgan, Federico Di Marco, Daniela Maria Cirillo","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00815-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00815-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the performance of the targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS)-based Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics AmPORE TB assay, recently approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) as tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic test for the detection of drug resistance on respiratory specimens. A total of 104 DNA samples from Xpert MTB/RIF-positive TB sputum specimens were tested using the AmPORE TB kit, with the GenoScreen Deeplex Myc-TB as a comparative tNGS assay. For AmPORE TB, DNA samples were divided into five sequencing runs on the MinION device. Data analysis was performed using proprietary software. The WHO catalog of mutations was used for drug resistance interpretation. The assay achieved a high validity rate of 98% (102/104 DNA samples), homogeneous mean reads coverage across TB-positive specimens, and 100% positive and negative agreements for detecting mutations associated with resistance to rifampicin, pyrazinamide, fluoroquinolones, ethambutol, and capreomycin compared with Deeplex Myc-TB. The main discrepancies for the remaining drugs were attributable to the different assay panel designs. The AmPORE TB turnaround time was approximately 5-6 hours from extracted DNA to tNGS reporting for batches of 22 DNA samples. The AmPORE TB assay drastically reduced the time to tNGS reporting from days to hours and showed good performance for drug-resistant TB profiling compared with Deeplex Myc-TB.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> provides comprehensive resistance predictions matched to new multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis regimens and received World Health Organization approval for clinical use in respiratory samples in 2024. The advanced version of the Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics AmPORE TB tNGS kit was evaluated in this study for the first time and demonstrated good performance, flexibility, and faster turnaround time compared with the existing solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0081524"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481573/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of a point-of-care multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the diagnosis of typhoid: results from a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study. 评估用于伤寒诊断的护理点多重免疫层析测定:一项回顾性诊断准确性研究的结果。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00428-24
Rumina Hasan, Zahida Azizullah, Hina Shams, Sabine Dittrich, Jason R Andrews, Richelle C Charles, Javan Esfandiari, Dhammika Gunasekera, Kevin K A Tetteh, Jyotshna Sapkota

There is a clear medical need for an accurate diagnostic test for typhoid that can be performed at point of care. Two antigens (lipopolysaccharide [LPS] and hemolysin E [HlyE]) have recently been identified that can distinguish typhoid from other bacterial infections. Here, we present the results of a diagnostic accuracy study of the Dual Path Platform (DPP) Typhoid assay (Chembio) that detects IgA to both LPS and HlyE using blood culture as the reference standard. This was a retrospective, observational, laboratory study conducted at the Aga Khan University research laboratory, Pakistan, to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the DPP Typhoid assay, using archived frozen serum samples collected during a previous typhoid diagnostic accuracy study (NCT04801602). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (area under the receptor operating characteristics curve [AUC]) were then assessed using the manufacturer's and Youden's optimal thresholds. In total, 385 samples were included in the analysis. Using the manufacturer's thresholds, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 94.6-99.2), 65.3% (95% CI 58.5-71.6), and 81.5% (95% CI 75.5-85.3), respectively. At Youden's optimal threshold, the overall sensitivity of the DPP Typhoid assay was 89.7% and the specificity was 82.2%. In latent class modeling compared with other nine rapid diagnostic tests evaluated from the same cohort sample, the DPP Typhoid assay demonstrated the highest balanced accuracy (89.2%). The DPP Typhoid assay demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy for typhoid fever. However, further adjustment to new thresholds is recommended to enhance its performance capabilities.

Importance: Currently available diagnostic tests for typhoid have several limitations, including low sensitivity and specificity. Dual Path Platform Typhoid assay is a multiplex rapid test that detects IgA antibodies to lipopolysaccharide and hemolysin E antigen. It is considered to have high sensitivity and specificity, and its results were found to be highly correlated with ELISA results. However, very few studies have been conducted to evaluate this test and limited information about the accuracy of this test is present. Hence, this study evaluated the new typhoid test.

医学界显然需要一种可在医疗点进行的伤寒准确诊断检测。最近发现的两种抗原(脂多糖 [LPS] 和溶血素 E [HlyE])可将伤寒与其他细菌感染区分开来。在此,我们介绍了以血液培养为参考标准的双路径平台(DPP)伤寒检测法(Chembio)的诊断准确性研究结果,该检测法可同时检测 LPS 和 HlyE 的 IgA。这是一项回顾性、观察性实验室研究,在巴基斯坦阿迦汗大学研究实验室进行,目的是利用之前伤寒诊断准确性研究(NCT04801602)中收集的存档冷冻血清样本,评估DPP伤寒检测法的灵敏度和特异性。然后使用制造商和尤登的最佳阈值评估灵敏度、特异性和准确性(受体工作特征曲线下面积 [AUC])。共有 385 份样本被纳入分析。使用制造商的阈值,灵敏度、特异性和 AUC 分别为 97.8%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 94.6-99.2)、65.3%(95% CI 58.5-71.6)和 81.5%(95% CI 75.5-85.3)。在尤登最佳阈值下,DPP 伤寒检测法的总体灵敏度为 89.7%,特异度为 82.2%。在潜类模型中,DPP 伤寒检测法与同组样本中的其他九种快速诊断检测法进行了比较,DPP 伤寒检测法的平衡准确率最高(89.2%)。DPP 伤寒检测法对伤寒的诊断准确率很高。然而,建议进一步调整新的阈值,以提高其性能能力:重要性:目前可用的伤寒诊断检测方法存在一些局限性,包括灵敏度和特异性较低。双路径平台伤寒检测法是一种多重快速检测法,可检测脂多糖和溶血素 E 抗原的 IgA 抗体。它被认为具有高灵敏度和特异性,其结果与 ELISA 结果高度相关。然而,很少有研究对该检测方法进行评估,有关该检测方法准确性的信息也很有限。因此,本研究对新的伤寒检验方法进行了评估。
{"title":"Evaluation of a point-of-care multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the diagnosis of typhoid: results from a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Rumina Hasan, Zahida Azizullah, Hina Shams, Sabine Dittrich, Jason R Andrews, Richelle C Charles, Javan Esfandiari, Dhammika Gunasekera, Kevin K A Tetteh, Jyotshna Sapkota","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00428-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00428-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a clear medical need for an accurate diagnostic test for typhoid that can be performed at point of care. Two antigens (lipopolysaccharide [LPS] and hemolysin E [HlyE]) have recently been identified that can distinguish typhoid from other bacterial infections. Here, we present the results of a diagnostic accuracy study of the Dual Path Platform (DPP) Typhoid assay (Chembio) that detects IgA to both LPS and HlyE using blood culture as the reference standard. This was a retrospective, observational, laboratory study conducted at the Aga Khan University research laboratory, Pakistan, to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the DPP Typhoid assay, using archived frozen serum samples collected during a previous typhoid diagnostic accuracy study (NCT04801602). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (area under the receptor operating characteristics curve [AUC]) were then assessed using the manufacturer's and Youden's optimal thresholds. In total, 385 samples were included in the analysis. Using the manufacturer's thresholds, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 94.6-99.2), 65.3% (95% CI 58.5-71.6), and 81.5% (95% CI 75.5-85.3), respectively. At Youden's optimal threshold, the overall sensitivity of the DPP Typhoid assay was 89.7% and the specificity was 82.2%. In latent class modeling compared with other nine rapid diagnostic tests evaluated from the same cohort sample, the DPP Typhoid assay demonstrated the highest balanced accuracy (89.2%). The DPP Typhoid assay demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy for typhoid fever. However, further adjustment to new thresholds is recommended to enhance its performance capabilities.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Currently available diagnostic tests for typhoid have several limitations, including low sensitivity and specificity. Dual Path Platform Typhoid assay is a multiplex rapid test that detects IgA antibodies to lipopolysaccharide and hemolysin E antigen. It is considered to have high sensitivity and specificity, and its results were found to be highly correlated with ELISA results. However, very few studies have been conducted to evaluate this test and limited information about the accuracy of this test is present. Hence, this study evaluated the new typhoid test.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0042824"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481547/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142288394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Monocentric evaluation of the Novaplex dermatophyte multiplex qPCR assay in the diagnosis of dermatophytoses. 对 Novaplex 皮癣菌多重 qPCR 检测法诊断皮癣菌病的单中心评估。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00894-24
Florian Harel, Florence Robert-Gangneux, Jean-Pierre Gangneux, Hélène Guegan

Superficial fungal infections caused by dermatophytes are a prevalent global health concern. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of these pathogens through molecular tools would offer a substantial advantage for early detection and effective treatment. The conventional fungal culture presents inherent limitations, including extended result delivery delay and variable sensitivity. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the multiplex real-time PCR Novaplex dermatophyte assay (Seegene) in comparison to traditional mycological methods including direct examination and culture. A total of 312 nail, skin, and scalp samples collected from patients with suspected superficial fungal infections for mycological diagnosis were retrospectively subjected to the Novaplex dermatophyte assay. Overall, 170 (54.6%) and 186 (59.6%) samples tested positive for dermatophyte culture and dermatophyte PCR, respectively. The concordance between PCR and culture for dermatophyte detection was 87.2%. There were 158 culture-positive/PCR-positive samples, 12 culture-positive/PCR-negative samples, and 28 culture-negative/PCR-positive samples. The sensitivity of PCR against culture varied according to the dermatophyte target, ranging from 90.5% (Trichophyton mentagrophytes/interdigitale/benhamiae), 91.2% (Trichophyton rubrum), to 100% (Microsporum spp. and Trichophyton tonsurans). When considering the final diagnosis using composite criteria, the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of dermatophytosis were 92.9% and 96.6% for PCR, 86.7% and 100% for culture, and 95.4% and 92.2% for direct examination and culture combined, respectively. The Seegene Novaplex dermatophyte assay is an easy-to-use automated one-step extraction-PCR system that offers satisfactory performance for routine diagnosis of dermatophytoses in clinical laboratories, particularly in non-specialized centers. However, it cannot fully replace conventional mycology due to its inability to detect mold infections and to identify dermatophytes at the species level.

由皮真菌引起的表皮真菌感染是全球普遍关注的健康问题。通过分子工具对这些病原体进行快速准确的诊断将为早期检测和有效治疗提供巨大优势。传统的真菌培养存在固有的局限性,包括结果传递延迟时间长、灵敏度不一。本研究旨在评估多重实时 PCR Novaplex 皮癣菌检测法(Seegene)与传统真菌学方法(包括直接检查和培养)的性能比较。我们对从疑似浅表真菌感染患者处采集的 312 份指甲、皮肤和头皮样本进行了回顾性分析。总体而言,分别有 170 份(54.6%)和 186 份(59.6%)样本的皮真菌培养和皮真菌 PCR 检测结果呈阳性。皮癣菌检测的 PCR 与培养的一致性为 87.2%。培养阳性/PCR 阳性的样本有 158 个,培养阳性/PCR 阴性的样本有 12 个,培养阴性/PCR 阳性的样本有 28 个。PCR 对培养的敏感性因目标皮癣菌而异,从 90.5%(门冬癣毛癣菌/interdigitale/benhamiae)、91.2%(红毛癣菌)到 100%(小孢子菌属和扁桃体毛癣菌)不等。在使用综合标准考虑最终诊断时,PCR 对皮癣病诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为 92.9% 和 96.6%,培养的敏感性和特异性分别为 86.7% 和 100%,直接检查和培养相结合的敏感性和特异性分别为 95.4% 和 92.2%。Seegene Novaplex皮癣菌检测法是一种易于使用的自动化一步提取-PCR系统,在临床实验室,尤其是非专业中心的皮癣菌常规诊断中表现令人满意。但是,由于它不能检测霉菌感染,也不能在物种水平上鉴定皮癣菌,因此不能完全取代传统的真菌学。
{"title":"Monocentric evaluation of the Novaplex dermatophyte multiplex qPCR assay in the diagnosis of dermatophytoses.","authors":"Florian Harel, Florence Robert-Gangneux, Jean-Pierre Gangneux, Hélène Guegan","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00894-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00894-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Superficial fungal infections caused by dermatophytes are a prevalent global health concern. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of these pathogens through molecular tools would offer a substantial advantage for early detection and effective treatment. The conventional fungal culture presents inherent limitations, including extended result delivery delay and variable sensitivity. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the multiplex real-time PCR Novaplex dermatophyte assay (Seegene) in comparison to traditional mycological methods including direct examination and culture. A total of 312 nail, skin, and scalp samples collected from patients with suspected superficial fungal infections for mycological diagnosis were retrospectively subjected to the Novaplex dermatophyte assay. Overall, 170 (54.6%) and 186 (59.6%) samples tested positive for dermatophyte culture and dermatophyte PCR, respectively. The concordance between PCR and culture for dermatophyte detection was 87.2%. There were 158 culture-positive/PCR-positive samples, 12 culture-positive/PCR-negative samples, and 28 culture-negative/PCR-positive samples. The sensitivity of PCR against culture varied according to the dermatophyte target, ranging from 90.5% (<i>Trichophyton mentagrophytes/interdigitale/benhamiae</i>), 91.2% (<i>Trichophyton rubrum</i>), to 100% (<i>Microsporum</i> spp. and <i>Trichophyton tonsurans</i>). When considering the final diagnosis using composite criteria, the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of dermatophytosis were 92.9% and 96.6% for PCR, 86.7% and 100% for culture, and 95.4% and 92.2% for direct examination and culture combined, respectively. The Seegene Novaplex dermatophyte assay is an easy-to-use automated one-step extraction-PCR system that offers satisfactory performance for routine diagnosis of dermatophytoses in clinical laboratories, particularly in non-specialized centers. However, it cannot fully replace conventional mycology due to its inability to detect mold infections and to identify dermatophytes at the species level.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0089424"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481540/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142347642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defining the value of medical microbiology consultation. 确定医学微生物学咨询的价值。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00359-24
Kyle G Rodino, Paul M Luethy, April N Abbott, Jeffrey M Bender, Allison R Eberly, Melissa Gitman, Amy Leber, Jennifer Dien Bard

Medical microbiologists, defined as doctoral-level laboratory directors with subspecialty training in medical microbiology, lead the clinical laboratory operations through activities such as clinical consultations, oversight of diagnostic testing menu, institutional leadership, education, and scholastic activities. However, unlike their clinical colleagues, medical microbiologists are largely unable to bill for clinical consultations performed within the hospital and, therefore, unable to generate relative value units or a similar quantifiable metric. As hospital budgets tighten and justification of staffing becomes a necessity, this may present a challenge to the medical microbiologist attempting to prove their value to the organization. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. Consults were generated equally from internal (laboratory-based) and external (hospital-based) parties, with the majority directly impacting patient management. Near universal acceptance of the medical microbiologist's recommendation highlights the worth derived from their expertise. External consults required more time commitment from the medical microbiologist than internal consults, although both presented ample opportunity for secondary value, including impact through stewardship, education, clinical guidance, and cost reduction. This study is a description of the content and impact of consultations that underscore the importance of the medical microbiologist as a key member of the healthcare team.

Importance: Medical microbiologists are invaluable to the clinical microbiology laboratory and the healthcare system as a whole. However, as medical microbiologists do not regularly generate relative value units, capturing and quantifying the value provided is challenging. As hospital budgets tighten, justification of staffing becomes a necessity. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide detailed evaluation of the consultative value provided by medical microbiologists.

医学微生物学家被定义为接受过医学微生物学亚专业培训的博士级实验室主任,他们通过临床会诊、监督诊断检测菜单、机构领导、教育和学术活动等活动领导临床实验室的运作。然而,与他们的临床同事不同,医学微生物学家基本上无法为在医院内进行的临床会诊收费,因此无法产生相对价值单位或类似的可量化指标。随着医院预算的紧缩和人员编制的合理化,这可能会给试图证明自己对组织价值的医学微生物学家带来挑战。为了帮助提供有形数据,美国微生物学会人事标准和劳动力分会在七个医疗中心开展了一项多中心研究,以记录临床会诊及其影响。来自内部(以实验室为基础)和外部(以医院为基础)的会诊各占一半,其中大多数会诊直接影响到患者管理。医学微生物学家的建议几乎被普遍接受,这凸显了其专业知识的价值。与内部会诊相比,外部会诊需要医学微生物学家投入更多的时间,但两者都提供了充分的二次价值机会,包括通过管理、教育、临床指导和降低成本产生的影响。本研究描述了会诊的内容和影响,强调了医学微生物学家作为医疗团队重要成员的重要性:医学微生物学家对于临床微生物实验室和整个医疗保健系统来说都是无价之宝。然而,由于医学微生物学家不会定期产生相对价值单位,因此获取和量化所提供的价值具有挑战性。随着医院预算的紧缩,必须对人员配备进行论证。为了帮助提供实际数据,美国微生物学会人事标准和劳动力分会在七个医疗中心开展了一项多中心研究,以记录临床会诊及其影响。据我们所知,这是第一项对医学微生物学家提供的咨询价值进行详细评估的研究。
{"title":"Defining the value of medical microbiology consultation.","authors":"Kyle G Rodino, Paul M Luethy, April N Abbott, Jeffrey M Bender, Allison R Eberly, Melissa Gitman, Amy Leber, Jennifer Dien Bard","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00359-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00359-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical microbiologists, defined as doctoral-level laboratory directors with subspecialty training in medical microbiology, lead the clinical laboratory operations through activities such as clinical consultations, oversight of diagnostic testing menu, institutional leadership, education, and scholastic activities. However, unlike their clinical colleagues, medical microbiologists are largely unable to bill for clinical consultations performed within the hospital and, therefore, unable to generate relative value units or a similar quantifiable metric. As hospital budgets tighten and justification of staffing becomes a necessity, this may present a challenge to the medical microbiologist attempting to prove their value to the organization. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. Consults were generated equally from internal (laboratory-based) and external (hospital-based) parties, with the majority directly impacting patient management. Near universal acceptance of the medical microbiologist's recommendation highlights the worth derived from their expertise. External consults required more time commitment from the medical microbiologist than internal consults, although both presented ample opportunity for secondary value, including impact through stewardship, education, clinical guidance, and cost reduction. This study is a description of the content and impact of consultations that underscore the importance of the medical microbiologist as a key member of the healthcare team.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Medical microbiologists are invaluable to the clinical microbiology laboratory and the healthcare system as a whole. However, as medical microbiologists do not regularly generate relative value units, capturing and quantifying the value provided is challenging. As hospital budgets tighten, justification of staffing becomes a necessity. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide detailed evaluation of the consultative value provided by medical microbiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0035924"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481510/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141432001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of an expanded antibiotic resistance gene panel on prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility results for Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures. 评估扩展抗生素耐药性基因面板对血液培养物中革兰氏阴性菌抗菌药敏感性结果的预测作用。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01020-24
Carmila Manuel, Richard Maynard, Synthia Simpkins, Michelle Haro, Romney Humphries

The QIAstat-Dx BCID Panels (RUO) ("QIAstat," QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) for identification of 13 Gram-negative bacteria and 18 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene groups was evaluated. The study was conducted in two phases; in phase 1, analytical performance was evaluated against 154 challenge isolates against whole genome sequencing data. In this phase, sensitivity and specificity of organism identification calls were 153/154 (99.3%) and 1,748/1,749 (99.8%), respectively. For AMR genes, sensitivity was 434/435 (99.8%) and specificity was 2,334/2,337 (99.9%). One false-negative blaIMP, one false-positive blaCTX-M, and two false-positive aac-6'-lb detections were noted in this challenge set of organisms. In phase 2, 101 clinical blood culture isolates of Gram-negative rods were evaluated by the multiplexed PCR versus reference broth microdilution, for the ability of identification combined with AMR genes to predict final susceptibility results. Negative predictive values were 92.8% for ampicillin resistance (100% for Escherichia coli), 93.4% for ceftriaxone, 97.4% for ceftazidime, and 98.7% for cefepime. In constrast, negative predictive values for current standard of care (identification plus detection of blaCTX-M) ranged from 56.5% to 88.8%. This study demonstrated additive value of additional beta-lactamase genes for bacteria isolated from blood cultures.

Importance: Prediction of Gram-negative bacteria resistance through detection of resistance genes is complex. This study evaluated a novel, direct-from-blood or bacterial isolate multiplexed PCR for the detection of 17 resistance genes, and evaluated the prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility.

对 QIAstat-Dx BCID Panels (RUO)("QIAstat",QIAGEN,德国希尔登)鉴定 13 种革兰氏阴性菌和 18 种抗菌素耐药性 (AMR) 基因组的能力进行了评估。研究分两个阶段进行;在第一阶段,根据全基因组测序数据对 154 个挑战分离物的分析性能进行了评估。在这一阶段,生物识别调用的灵敏度和特异性分别为 153/154(99.3%)和 1,748/1,749 (99.8%)。对于 AMR 基因,灵敏度为 434/435(99.8%),特异性为 2,334/2,337 (99.9%)。在这组挑战生物中,发现了一次 blaIMP 假阴性、一次 blaCTX-M 假阳性和两次 aac-6'-lb 假阳性检测。在第二阶段,通过多重 PCR 与参考肉汤微量稀释法对比,对 101 例临床血液培养分离的革兰氏阴性杆菌进行了评估,以确定结合 AMR 基因进行鉴定以预测最终药敏结果的能力。氨苄西林耐药性的阴性预测值为 92.8%(大肠埃希菌为 100%),头孢曲松为 93.4%,头孢他啶为 97.4%,头孢吡肟为 98.7%。相比之下,现行标准疗法(鉴定加检测 blaCTX-M)的阴性预测值从 56.5% 到 88.8%不等。这项研究证明了额外的β-内酰胺酶基因对从血液培养物中分离出的细菌的附加价值:重要意义:通过检测耐药基因来预测革兰氏阴性细菌的耐药性非常复杂。本研究评估了一种新型的、直接从血液或细菌分离物中检测 17 种耐药基因的多重 PCR,并评估了对抗菌药敏感性的预测。
{"title":"Evaluation of an expanded antibiotic resistance gene panel on prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility results for Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures.","authors":"Carmila Manuel, Richard Maynard, Synthia Simpkins, Michelle Haro, Romney Humphries","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01020-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01020-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The QIAstat-Dx BCID Panels (RUO) (\"QIAstat,\" QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) for identification of 13 Gram-negative bacteria and 18 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene groups was evaluated. The study was conducted in two phases; in phase 1, analytical performance was evaluated against 154 challenge isolates against whole genome sequencing data. In this phase, sensitivity and specificity of organism identification calls were 153/154 (99.3%) and 1,748/1,749 (99.8%), respectively. For AMR genes, sensitivity was 434/435 (99.8%) and specificity was 2,334/2,337 (99.9%). One false-negative <i>bla</i><sub>IMP</sub>, one false-positive <i>bla</i><sub>CTX-M</sub>, and two false-positive aac-6'-lb detections were noted in this challenge set of organisms. In phase 2, 101 clinical blood culture isolates of Gram-negative rods were evaluated by the multiplexed PCR versus reference broth microdilution, for the ability of identification combined with AMR genes to predict final susceptibility results. Negative predictive values were 92.8% for ampicillin resistance (100% for <i>Escherichia coli</i>), 93.4% for ceftriaxone, 97.4% for ceftazidime, and 98.7% for cefepime. In constrast, negative predictive values for current standard of care (identification plus detection of <i>bla</i><sub>CTX-M</sub>) ranged from 56.5% to 88.8%. This study demonstrated additive value of additional beta-lactamase genes for bacteria isolated from blood cultures.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prediction of Gram-negative bacteria resistance through detection of resistance genes is complex. This study evaluated a novel, direct-from-blood or bacterial isolate multiplexed PCR for the detection of 17 resistance genes, and evaluated the prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0102024"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481509/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142288395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analytical and clinical validation of direct detection of antimicrobial resistance markers by plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing. 通过血浆微生物无细胞 DNA 测序直接检测抗菌药耐药性标记物的分析和临床验证。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00425-24
Fred C Christians, Jamilla Akhund-Zade, Kristin Jarman, Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam, Nicholas Noll, Timothy A Blauwkamp, Sivan Bercovici, Aga Zielinska, Amy L Carr, Arryn Craney, Matthew Pike, John Joseph Farrell, Sanjeet Dadwal, James B Wood, Efrat Matkovich, Staci McAdams, Frederick S Nolte

Sequencing of plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) has gained increased acceptance as a valuable adjunct to standard-of-care testing for diagnosis of infections throughout the body. Here, we report the analytical and clinical validation of a novel application of mcfDNA sequencing, the non-invasive detection of seven common antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genetic markers in 18 important pathogens. The AMR markers include SCCmec, mecA, mecC, vanA, vanB, blaCTX-M, and blaKPC. The AMR markers were computationally linked to the pathogens detected. Analytical validation showed high reproducibility (100%), inclusivity (54 to 100%), and exclusivity (100%). Clinical accuracy was assessed with 114 unique plasma samples from patients at seven study sites with concordant culture results for target bacteria from a variety of specimen types and correlated with available phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test results and genotypic results. The positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and diagnostic yield (DY) were estimated for each AMR marker. DY was defined as the percentage of tests that yielded an actionable result of either detected or not detected. The results for the combination of SCCmec and mecA for staphylococci were PPA 19/20 (95.0%), NPA 21/22 (95.4%), DY 42/60 (70.0%); vanA for enterococci were PPA 3/3 (100%), NPA 2/2 (100%), DY 5/6 (83.3%); blaCTX-M for gram-negative bacilli were PPA 5/6 (83.3%), NPA 29/29 (100%), DY 35/49 (71.4%); and blaKPC for gram-negative bacilli were PPA 0/2 (0%), NPA: 23/23 (100%), DY 25/44 (56.8%). The addition of AMR capability to plasma mcfDNA sequencing should provide clinicians with an effective new culture-independent tool for optimization of therapy.

Importance: This manuscript is ideally suited for the Innovative Diagnostic Methods sections as it reports the analytical and clinical validation of a novel application of plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing for direct detection of seven selected antimicrobial resistance markers in 18 target pathogens. Clearly, it has potential clinical utility in optimizing therapy and was incorporated into the Karius test workflow in September 2023. In addition, the workflow could readily be adapted to expand the number of target bacteria and antimicrobial resistance markers as needed.

血浆微生物无细胞DNA(mcfDNA)测序作为诊断全身感染的标准检测方法的重要辅助手段,已被越来越多的人接受。在此,我们报告了 mcfDNA 测序新应用的分析和临床验证,即对 18 种重要病原体中 7 种常见抗菌药耐药性 (AMR) 遗传标记的无创检测。AMR 标记包括 SCCmec、mecA、mecC、vanA、vanB、blaCTX-M 和 blaKPC。AMR 标记通过计算与检测到的病原体建立了联系。分析验证结果表明,该方法具有很高的重现性(100%)、包容性(54% 至 100%)和排他性(100%)。对临床准确性的评估采用了 114 份独特的血浆样本,这些样本来自 7 个研究机构的患者,其目标细菌的培养结果与各种类型标本的培养结果一致,并与现有的表型抗菌药敏感性检测结果和基因型结果相关联。估算了每个 AMR 标记的阳性一致率 (PPA)、阴性一致率 (NPA) 和诊断率 (DY)。DY 的定义是得出检测到或未检测到的可操作结果的检测百分比。针对葡萄球菌的 SCCmec 和 mecA 组合检测结果为 PPA 19/20 (95.0%)、NPA 21/22 (95.4%)、DY 42/60 (70.0%);针对肠球菌的 vanA 检测结果为 PPA 3/3 (100%)、NPA 2/2 (100%)、DY 5/6 (83.3%)。3%);针对革兰氏阴性杆菌的 blaCTX-M 为 PPA 5/6 (83.3%)、NPA 29/29 (100%)、DY 35/49 (71.4%);针对革兰氏阴性杆菌的 blaKPC 为 PPA 0/2 (0%)、NPA: 23/23 (100%)、DY 25/44 (56.8%)。在血浆 mcfDNA 测序中加入 AMR 功能,将为临床医生优化治疗提供一种有效的、独立于培养的新工具:本稿件非常适合创新诊断方法栏目,因为它报告了血浆微生物无细胞 DNA 测序的新应用的分析和临床验证,该测序可直接检测 18 种目标病原体中的 7 种选定抗菌药耐药性标记物。显然,它在优化治疗方面具有潜在的临床实用性,并于 2023 年 9 月被纳入卡里乌斯检测工作流程。此外,该工作流程可根据需要随时调整,以扩大目标细菌和抗菌药耐药性标记物的数量。
{"title":"Analytical and clinical validation of direct detection of antimicrobial resistance markers by plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing.","authors":"Fred C Christians, Jamilla Akhund-Zade, Kristin Jarman, Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam, Nicholas Noll, Timothy A Blauwkamp, Sivan Bercovici, Aga Zielinska, Amy L Carr, Arryn Craney, Matthew Pike, John Joseph Farrell, Sanjeet Dadwal, James B Wood, Efrat Matkovich, Staci McAdams, Frederick S Nolte","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00425-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00425-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sequencing of plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) has gained increased acceptance as a valuable adjunct to standard-of-care testing for diagnosis of infections throughout the body. Here, we report the analytical and clinical validation of a novel application of mcfDNA sequencing, the non-invasive detection of seven common antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genetic markers in 18 important pathogens. The AMR markers include SCC<i>mec</i>, <i>mecA, mecC</i>, <i>vanA, vanB</i>, <i>bla</i><sub>CTX-M</sub>, and <i>bla</i><sub>KPC</sub>. The AMR markers were computationally linked to the pathogens detected. Analytical validation showed high reproducibility (100%), inclusivity (54 to 100%), and exclusivity (100%). Clinical accuracy was assessed with 114 unique plasma samples from patients at seven study sites with concordant culture results for target bacteria from a variety of specimen types and correlated with available phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test results and genotypic results. The positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and diagnostic yield (DY) were estimated for each AMR marker. DY was defined as the percentage of tests that yielded an actionable result of either detected or not detected. The results for the combination of SCC<i>mec</i> and <i>mecA</i> for staphylococci were PPA 19/20 (95.0%), NPA 21/22 (95.4%), DY 42/60 (70.0%); <i>vanA</i> for enterococci were PPA 3/3 (100%), NPA 2/2 (100%), DY 5/6 (83.3%); <i>bla</i><sub>CTX-M</sub> for gram-negative bacilli were PPA 5/6 (83.3%), NPA 29/29 (100%), DY 35/49 (71.4%); and <i>bla</i><sub>KPC</sub> for gram-negative bacilli were PPA 0/2 (0%), NPA: 23/23 (100%), DY 25/44 (56.8%). The addition of AMR capability to plasma mcfDNA sequencing should provide clinicians with an effective new culture-independent tool for optimization of therapy.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>This manuscript is ideally suited for the Innovative Diagnostic Methods sections as it reports the analytical and clinical validation of a novel application of plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing for direct detection of seven selected antimicrobial resistance markers in 18 target pathogens. Clearly, it has potential clinical utility in optimizing therapy and was incorporated into the Karius test workflow in September 2023. In addition, the workflow could readily be adapted to expand the number of target bacteria and antimicrobial resistance markers as needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0042524"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481525/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Serosurveillance of Coxiella burnetii in feral swine populations of Hawai'i and Texas identifies overlap with human Q fever incidence. 夏威夷和德克萨斯州野猪群中烧伤科克西氏菌的血清监测发现了与人类 Q 热发病率的重叠。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00780-24
Ian A McMillan, Michael H Norris, Samuel J Golon, Gregory A Franckowiak, James M Grinolds, Samuel M Goldstein, Darrin M Phelps, Michael J Bodenchuk, Bruce R Leland, Richard A Bowen, Vienna R Brown, Bradley R Borlee

Feral swine are invasive in the United States and a reservoir for infectious diseases. The increase in feral swine population and the geographic range are a concern for the spread of zoonotic diseases to humans and livestock. Feral swine could contribute to the spread of Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of human Q fever. In this study, we characterized the seroprevalence of C. burnetii in feral swine populations of Hawai'i and Texas, which have low and high rates of human Q fever, respectively. Seropositivity rates were as high as 0.19% and 6.03% in Hawai'i and Texas, respectively, indicating that feral swine cannot be ruled out as a potential reservoir for disease transmission and spread. In Texas, we identified the overlap between seropositivity of feral swine and human Q fever incidence. These results indicate that there is a potentially low but detectable risk of C. burnetii exposure associated with feral swine populations in Hawai'i and Texas.

野猪是美国的入侵物种,也是传染病的传播源。野猪数量的增加和地域范围的扩大是人畜共患疾病向人类和牲畜传播的隐患。野猪可能会导致人类 Q 热的病原体烧伤科克西氏菌的传播。在这项研究中,我们分析了夏威夷和德克萨斯州野猪群中烧伤克氏菌血清阳性率的特征,这两个地方的人类 Q 热发病率分别较低和较高。夏威夷和德克萨斯州的血清阳性率分别高达 0.19% 和 6.03%,这表明不能排除野猪是疾病传播和扩散的潜在储库。在得克萨斯州,我们发现野猪血清阳性反应与人类 Q 热发病率之间存在重叠。这些结果表明,夏威夷和得克萨斯州的野猪种群可能存在较低但可检测到的烧伤弧菌暴露风险。
{"title":"Serosurveillance of <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> in feral swine populations of Hawai'i and Texas identifies overlap with human Q fever incidence.","authors":"Ian A McMillan, Michael H Norris, Samuel J Golon, Gregory A Franckowiak, James M Grinolds, Samuel M Goldstein, Darrin M Phelps, Michael J Bodenchuk, Bruce R Leland, Richard A Bowen, Vienna R Brown, Bradley R Borlee","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00780-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00780-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feral swine are invasive in the United States and a reservoir for infectious diseases. The increase in feral swine population and the geographic range are a concern for the spread of zoonotic diseases to humans and livestock. Feral swine could contribute to the spread of <i>Coxiella burnetii,</i> the causative agent of human Q fever. In this study, we characterized the seroprevalence of <i>C. burnetii</i> in feral swine populations of Hawai'i and Texas, which have low and high rates of human Q fever, respectively. Seropositivity rates were as high as 0.19% and 6.03% in Hawai'i and Texas, respectively, indicating that feral swine cannot be ruled out as a potential reservoir for disease transmission and spread. In Texas, we identified the overlap between seropositivity of feral swine and human Q fever incidence. These results indicate that there is a potentially low but detectable risk of <i>C. burnetii</i> exposure associated with feral swine populations in Hawai'i and Texas.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0078024"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1