Timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is crucial for patients with Gram-negative (GN) blood stream infections. In this study, the performance of VITEK REVEAL (bioMérieux, USA), an FDA cleared in vitro diagnostic automated system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) directly from positive blood culture (BC), was compared to that of Accelerate Pheno (Accelerate Diagnostics, USA), as standard of care method. 128 GN positive BCs were analyzed according to manufacturer recommendations, comparing time to result (TTR) and AST results. The categorical agreement (CA) rate between VITEK REVEAL and Accelerate Pheno was 94.3% and the essential agreement (EA) rate was 96.0%. Very major discrepancies (VMD), major discrepancies (MD), and minor discrepancies (miD) rates between the systems were 7.5%, 0.5%, and 4.1%, respectively. Lastly, we observed a mean sequential TTR (reporting of AST results per antibiotic in real-time) on VITEK REVEAL of 6.1 h (3.0-8.2) and mean final TTR of 7.9 h (6.5-8.2), compared to Accelerate Pheno, with a significantly shorter mean final TTR of 7.1 h (6.8-7.7). Sequential TTR on VITEK REVEAL was significantly shorter for resistant isolates (those with ≥1 'Resistant' antimicrobial-organism combination interpretation, using FDA STIC 2024 or CLSI M100 criteria) compared to susceptible/intermediate ones, with a mean difference of 1.4 h (P < 0.001). Overall, compared to Accelerate Pheno, VITEK REVEAL displayed high %CA and %EA for AST of GN bacteria directly from positive BC. Also, unlike Accelerate Pheno, VITEK REVEAL reports MIC results in real time, allowing an earlier release of actionable information useful for antimicrobial stewardship.
Importance: Previous studies have compared the performance of the VITEK REVEAL, system for fast antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) to conventional, non-rapid microbiology methods. To evaluate how the VITEK REVEAL correlates to similarly available fast, direct-from-blood culture AST technologies, this study aimed to compare it to the Accelerate Pheno system, as standard of care method. High categorical agreement (94.3%) and essential agreement (96.0%) between the two systems were observed, underscoring their reliability. The VITEK REVEAL has the advantage of real-time AST reporting, unlike the Accelerate Pheno. Ultimately, this study supports the need for and continued optimization of fast diagnostic technologies for AST, contributing to the goal of advancing antimicrobial stewardship-focused treatment strategies and improving the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infections.
{"title":"Comparison of the VITEK REVEAL AST and Accelerate Pheno systems for fast antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative blood cultures at a large academic health system.","authors":"Caroline Simmons-Williams, Luciano Soares, Deanna Becker, Amorce Lima, Laura Rowe, Dominic Uy, Heinz Salazar, Theresa Okeyo Owuor, Shivaramu Keelara, Richard Remington, Cecilia Carvalhaes, Suzane Silbert","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01073-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01073-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is crucial for patients with Gram-negative (GN) blood stream infections. In this study, the performance of VITEK REVEAL (bioMérieux, USA), an FDA cleared <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic automated system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) directly from positive blood culture (BC), was compared to that of Accelerate Pheno (Accelerate Diagnostics, USA), as standard of care method. 128 GN positive BCs were analyzed according to manufacturer recommendations, comparing time to result (TTR) and AST results. The categorical agreement (CA) rate between VITEK REVEAL and Accelerate Pheno was 94.3% and the essential agreement (EA) rate was 96.0%. Very major discrepancies (VMD), major discrepancies (MD), and minor discrepancies (miD) rates between the systems were 7.5%, 0.5%, and 4.1%, respectively. Lastly, we observed a mean sequential TTR (reporting of AST results per antibiotic in real-time) on VITEK REVEAL of 6.1 h (3.0-8.2) and mean final TTR of 7.9 h (6.5-8.2), compared to Accelerate Pheno, with a significantly shorter mean final TTR of 7.1 h (6.8-7.7). Sequential TTR on VITEK REVEAL was significantly shorter for resistant isolates (those with ≥1 'Resistant' antimicrobial-organism combination interpretation, using FDA STIC 2024 or CLSI M100 criteria) compared to susceptible/intermediate ones, with a mean difference of 1.4 h (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Overall, compared to Accelerate Pheno, VITEK REVEAL displayed high %CA and %EA for AST of GN bacteria directly from positive BC. Also, unlike Accelerate Pheno, VITEK REVEAL reports MIC results in real time, allowing an earlier release of actionable information useful for antimicrobial stewardship.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Previous studies have compared the performance of the VITEK REVEAL, system for fast antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) to conventional, non-rapid microbiology methods. To evaluate how the VITEK REVEAL correlates to similarly available fast, direct-from-blood culture AST technologies, this study aimed to compare it to the Accelerate Pheno system, as standard of care method. High categorical agreement (94.3%) and essential agreement (96.0%) between the two systems were observed, underscoring their reliability. The VITEK REVEAL has the advantage of real-time AST reporting, unlike the Accelerate Pheno. Ultimately, this study supports the need for and continued optimization of fast diagnostic technologies for AST, contributing to the goal of advancing antimicrobial stewardship-focused treatment strategies and improving the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0107325"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802176/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145774842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14Epub Date: 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01160-25
Rosemary C She, Jeffrey M Bender, Vinod Pullarkat, Sanjeet S Dadwal
Formulating safe and effective diagnostic stewardship guidance for blood cultures in immunocompromised patients is challenging due to limited data and high risk of infectious complications. A 2024 global shortage in blood culture bottles (BD Diagnostics) necessitated the implementation of blood culture stewardship, including at our tertiary care cancer center. This was a retrospective pre-post intervention study of the effects of diagnostic stewardship at a stand-alone cancer center during a 5-month period of the 2024 blood culture bottle shortage compared to the same 5-month unaffected period in 2023. Interventions included discontinuation of an ordering set for persistent fever, modification of an ordering set for new fever to recommend two sets of blood cultures for initial workup, and issuing revised blood culture ordering guidance to providers, phlebotomists, and nurses with repeated educational efforts. Stewardship interventions led to decreased blood culture utilization by 36.3% (from 14,021 to 8,932), while the number of patients tested remained similar. Greatest reductions in utilization occurred in inpatient encounters and with follow-up blood cultures. There was a trend toward increasing blood culture positivity following intervention, excluding potential contaminants (7.1% vs 7.6%, P = 0.08). The frequency of sepsis-coded encounters and 30-day mortality rate were similar between the two time periods. No adverse outcomes related to blood culture stewardship were reported. A significant reduction in blood culture utilization is achievable in a high-complexity cancer patient population without negative clinical impact through limiting the number of initial blood cultures and eliminating pre-emptive ordering of blood culture orders for persistent fever.IMPORTANCECancer and transplant patient populations are frequently excluded from experimental studies on decreasing blood culture utilization, but a recent global supply shortage in blood culture bottles provided a valuable opportunity to evaluate the effects of stewardship interventions on a large scale. This study, centered on a high-complexity cancer patient population, found that a significant 36.3% reduction in blood culture utilization was achievable, safe, and effective through multidisciplinary diagnostic stewardship efforts.
由于数据有限和感染并发症的高风险,为免疫功能低下患者的血培养制定安全有效的诊断管理指导具有挑战性。2024年全球血培养瓶(BD Diagnostics)短缺,需要实施血培养管理,包括在我们的三级保健癌症中心。这是一项回顾性干预前研究,研究了在2024年血培养瓶短缺的5个月期间,与2023年相同的5个月未受影响期间,独立癌症中心诊断管理的影响。干预措施包括停止对持续发热的排序,修改新发发热的排序,推荐两套血液培养用于初始检查,并通过反复的教育努力向提供者、抽血师和护士发布修订后的血液培养排序指南。管理干预导致血培养利用率下降36.3%(从14,021降至8,932),而接受检测的患者数量保持不变。在住院患者就诊和随访血培养中,使用率下降幅度最大。排除潜在污染物后,干预后血培养阳性呈上升趋势(7.1% vs 7.6%, P = 0.08)。两个时间段内败血症的发生频率和30天死亡率相似。未见与血培养管理相关的不良结果报告。在高度复杂的癌症患者群体中,通过限制初始血培养次数和消除对持续发热的预先血培养顺序,可以显著降低血培养利用率,而不会对临床产生负面影响。癌症和移植患者群体经常被排除在降低血培养利用率的实验研究之外,但最近全球血培养瓶供应短缺为大规模评估管理干预措施的效果提供了宝贵的机会。该研究以高度复杂的癌症患者群体为中心,发现通过多学科诊断管理工作,血培养利用率显著降低36.3%是可以实现的,安全有效的。
{"title":"Blood culture utilization and impact of stewardship practices during a national blood culture bottle shortage at a cancer center.","authors":"Rosemary C She, Jeffrey M Bender, Vinod Pullarkat, Sanjeet S Dadwal","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01160-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01160-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Formulating safe and effective diagnostic stewardship guidance for blood cultures in immunocompromised patients is challenging due to limited data and high risk of infectious complications. A 2024 global shortage in blood culture bottles (BD Diagnostics) necessitated the implementation of blood culture stewardship, including at our tertiary care cancer center. This was a retrospective pre-post intervention study of the effects of diagnostic stewardship at a stand-alone cancer center during a 5-month period of the 2024 blood culture bottle shortage compared to the same 5-month unaffected period in 2023. Interventions included discontinuation of an ordering set for persistent fever, modification of an ordering set for new fever to recommend two sets of blood cultures for initial workup, and issuing revised blood culture ordering guidance to providers, phlebotomists, and nurses with repeated educational efforts. Stewardship interventions led to decreased blood culture utilization by 36.3% (from 14,021 to 8,932), while the number of patients tested remained similar. Greatest reductions in utilization occurred in inpatient encounters and with follow-up blood cultures. There was a trend toward increasing blood culture positivity following intervention, excluding potential contaminants (7.1% vs 7.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.08). The frequency of sepsis-coded encounters and 30-day mortality rate were similar between the two time periods. No adverse outcomes related to blood culture stewardship were reported. A significant reduction in blood culture utilization is achievable in a high-complexity cancer patient population without negative clinical impact through limiting the number of initial blood cultures and eliminating pre-emptive ordering of blood culture orders for persistent fever.IMPORTANCECancer and transplant patient populations are frequently excluded from experimental studies on decreasing blood culture utilization, but a recent global supply shortage in blood culture bottles provided a valuable opportunity to evaluate the effects of stewardship interventions on a large scale. This study, centered on a high-complexity cancer patient population, found that a significant 36.3% reduction in blood culture utilization was achievable, safe, and effective through multidisciplinary diagnostic stewardship efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0116025"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802142/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01291-25
Eunji Lee, Woo Sang Jung, Chae Seung Lim, Woong Sik Jang
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a major cause of community-acquired pneumonia and increasingly exhibits macrolide resistance due to the A2063G and A2064G mutations in the 23S rRNA gene. We developed a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay with hybridization-based TaqMan-style probes (HyTaq) to simultaneously detect M. pneumoniae wild-type strains and macrolide resistance mutations (A2063G and A2064G) within a single reaction (hereafter referred to as the MP-R HyTaq-LAMP assay). Analytical performance was evaluated using plasmid standards, and clinical validation was conducted with 224 nasopharyngeal swab samples. The MP-R HyTaq-LAMP assay detected wild-type strains and the A2063G and A2064G mutations with a limit of detection of 1 × 10³ copies/μL. In clinical samples, the assay demonstrated 95.79% sensitivity for A2063G and 100% sensitivity for wild-type strains, along with 100% specificity against 103 non-infection samples. Additionally, no cross-reactivity was observed with 16 other common respiratory pathogens. The MP-R HyTaq-LAMP assay provides rapid, multiplex detection of M. pneumoniae and associated macrolide resistance mutations without thermal cycling, demonstrating its strong potential as a point-of-care diagnostic tool.
Importance: Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a significant cause of treatment failure in community-acquired respiratory infections, particularly in children and adolescents. Early and accurate detection of resistance-associated mutations, such as A2063G and A2064G, is essential for guiding effective antibiotic therapy. In this study, we developed an MP-R HyTaq-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay capable of simultaneously detecting and discriminating wild-type strains and macrolide resistance mutations (A2063G and A2064G) in a single-tube, isothermal reaction. Its high specificity, rapid turnaround time, and minimal equipment requirements make this assay suitable for point-of-care testing in diverse clinical settings.
{"title":"Development of a LAMP assay using hybridization-based TaqMan-style probes (HyTaq) for simultaneous detection of wild-type and macrolide-resistant <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i>.","authors":"Eunji Lee, Woo Sang Jung, Chae Seung Lim, Woong Sik Jang","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01291-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01291-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> is a major cause of community-acquired pneumonia and increasingly exhibits macrolide resistance due to the A2063G and A2064G mutations in the 23S rRNA gene. We developed a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay with hybridization-based TaqMan-style probes (HyTaq) to simultaneously detect <i>M. pneumoniae</i> wild-type strains and macrolide resistance mutations (A2063G and A2064G) within a single reaction (hereafter referred to as the MP-R HyTaq-LAMP assay). Analytical performance was evaluated using plasmid standards, and clinical validation was conducted with 224 nasopharyngeal swab samples. The MP-R HyTaq-LAMP assay detected wild-type strains and the A2063G and A2064G mutations with a limit of detection of 1 × 10³ copies/μL. In clinical samples, the assay demonstrated 95.79% sensitivity for A2063G and 100% sensitivity for wild-type strains, along with 100% specificity against 103 non-infection samples. Additionally, no cross-reactivity was observed with 16 other common respiratory pathogens. The MP-R HyTaq-LAMP assay provides rapid, multiplex detection of <i>M. pneumoniae</i> and associated macrolide resistance mutations without thermal cycling, demonstrating its strong potential as a point-of-care diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Macrolide-resistant <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> is a significant cause of treatment failure in community-acquired respiratory infections, particularly in children and adolescents. Early and accurate detection of resistance-associated mutations, such as A2063G and A2064G, is essential for guiding effective antibiotic therapy. In this study, we developed an MP-R HyTaq-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay capable of simultaneously detecting and discriminating wild-type strains and macrolide resistance mutations (A2063G and A2064G) in a single-tube, isothermal reaction. Its high specificity, rapid turnaround time, and minimal equipment requirements make this assay suitable for point-of-care testing in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0129125"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802244/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145774766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14Epub Date: 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01299-25
Zhen Feng, Shijia Ge, Peiwen Miao, Mei Liu, Qing Li, Rong Li, Lingyun Song, Yilin Zhang, Feng Sun, Xinchang Chen, Yang Li, Wenhong Zhang
Effective tuberculosis (TB) management relies on prompt diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and associated drug resistance. The Sanity 2.0 assay is a high-resolution melting assay designed for direct respiratory sample testing, enabling simultaneous detection of MTBC and resistance to rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), and fluoroquinolones (FQ) in a single step. This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in two registered multicenter trials among bacteriologically confirmed TB patients. Diagnostic performance was evaluated for MTBC detection, as well as for the identification of resistance to RIF, INH, and FQ, using phenotypic drug susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, and a composite reference standard. Agreement analyses were conducted between the Sanity 2.0 assay and Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/XDR. Among 611 patients, the Sanity 2.0 assay detected MTBC in 563 patients, exhibiting a sensitivity of 92.1% (95% CI: 89.7-94.0). For detecting resistance to RIF, INH, and FQ, sensitivities exceeded 90%, with specificities of 95.8% (95% CI: 88.5-98.6), 100.0% (95% CI: 96.4-100.0), and 97.8% (95% CI: 93.8-99.3) against the composite reference standard, respectively. The agreement with Xpert MTB/RIF for RIF detection was 98.6% (95% CI: 96.9-99.3). For INH and FQ resistance, the agreement with Xpert MTB/XDR was 92.0% (95% CI: 88.5-94.5) and 94.3% (95% CI: 91.2-96.3), respectively. The Sanity 2.0 assay is a rapid and user-friendly platform capable of detecting both MTBC and key drug resistance. It demonstrated good diagnostic performance and could potentially be an effective alternative to guide individualized anti-TB treatment, especially in resource-limited settings.
Importance: Rapid and accurate detection of both Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and key drug resistance is critical to improving tuberculosis treatment outcomes and reducing transmission. However, current molecular diagnostic workflows often require sequential testing, which can delay the initiation of effective and individualized therapy. We evaluated the Sanity 2.0 assay, an integrated high-resolution melting test that simultaneously detects MTBC and resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, and fluoroquinolone resistance directly from respiratory samples in about 2-3 hours. The assay demonstrated excellent performance, with MTBC detection sensitivity of 92.1% and drug resistance sensitivities exceeding 90% and specificities over 95% against a composite reference standard, as well as strong concordance with World Health Organization-endorsed molecular assays. Implementation of the Sanity 2.0 assay could streamline TB diagnostic workflows; enable rapid, single-step resistance profiling; and facilitate timely, individualized treatment-particularly in resource-limited settings where rapid and comprehensive resistance testing remains a critical unmet need.
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of the Sanity 2.0 assay to detect resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, and fluoroquinolones in tuberculosis.","authors":"Zhen Feng, Shijia Ge, Peiwen Miao, Mei Liu, Qing Li, Rong Li, Lingyun Song, Yilin Zhang, Feng Sun, Xinchang Chen, Yang Li, Wenhong Zhang","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01299-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01299-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective tuberculosis (TB) management relies on prompt diagnosis of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> complex (MTBC) and associated drug resistance. The Sanity 2.0 assay is a high-resolution melting assay designed for direct respiratory sample testing, enabling simultaneous detection of MTBC and resistance to rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), and fluoroquinolones (FQ) in a single step. This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in two registered multicenter trials among bacteriologically confirmed TB patients. Diagnostic performance was evaluated for MTBC detection, as well as for the identification of resistance to RIF, INH, and FQ, using phenotypic drug susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, and a composite reference standard. Agreement analyses were conducted between the Sanity 2.0 assay and Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/XDR. Among 611 patients, the Sanity 2.0 assay detected MTBC in 563 patients, exhibiting a sensitivity of 92.1% (95% CI: 89.7-94.0). For detecting resistance to RIF, INH, and FQ, sensitivities exceeded 90%, with specificities of 95.8% (95% CI: 88.5-98.6), 100.0% (95% CI: 96.4-100.0), and 97.8% (95% CI: 93.8-99.3) against the composite reference standard, respectively. The agreement with Xpert MTB/RIF for RIF detection was 98.6% (95% CI: 96.9-99.3). For INH and FQ resistance, the agreement with Xpert MTB/XDR was 92.0% (95% CI: 88.5-94.5) and 94.3% (95% CI: 91.2-96.3), respectively. The Sanity 2.0 assay is a rapid and user-friendly platform capable of detecting both MTBC and key drug resistance. It demonstrated good diagnostic performance and could potentially be an effective alternative to guide individualized anti-TB treatment, especially in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Rapid and accurate detection of both <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> complex (MTBC) and key drug resistance is critical to improving tuberculosis treatment outcomes and reducing transmission. However, current molecular diagnostic workflows often require sequential testing, which can delay the initiation of effective and individualized therapy. We evaluated the Sanity 2.0 assay, an integrated high-resolution melting test that simultaneously detects MTBC and resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, and fluoroquinolone resistance directly from respiratory samples in about 2-3 hours. The assay demonstrated excellent performance, with MTBC detection sensitivity of 92.1% and drug resistance sensitivities exceeding 90% and specificities over 95% against a composite reference standard, as well as strong concordance with World Health Organization-endorsed molecular assays. Implementation of the Sanity 2.0 assay could streamline TB diagnostic workflows; enable rapid, single-step resistance profiling; and facilitate timely, individualized treatment-particularly in resource-limited settings where rapid and comprehensive resistance testing remains a critical unmet need.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0129925"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01313-25
Benjamin Bigaud, Nicolas Marjanovic, Luc Deroche, Bertrand Drugeon, Marvin Piot, Nicolas Leveque, Olivier Mimoz, Jérémy Guenezan
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) place a substantial burden on emergency departments (EDs) during winter outbreaks. Their microbiological diagnosis is currently based on either broad-spectrum molecular techniques performed in laboratory, with turnaround times incompatible with ED workflows, or point-of-care systems, restricted to SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and RSV (quadriplex panel). The Spotfire combines rapid result and syndromic approach (10 respiratory viruses and 4 atypical bacteria), but its added value in EDs remains unassessed. During the 2023 winter, trained nurses collected nasopharyngeal swabs from adult patients with LRTI symptoms and operated the Spotfire in the ED of the Poitiers University Hospital. We described the viral epidemiology and evaluated the impact and efficacy of this rapid broad-spectrum diagnosis by comparing the management of patients with or without respiratory pathogen detected. From 15 December 2023 to 15 March 2024, 1,320 samples were analyzed with Spotfire, with a median turnaround time of 37 min and 10 uninterpretable results. A total of 540 (41%) were positive. Influenza A (30.9%), rhinovirus/enterovirus (21.1%), and SARS-CoV-2 (18.7%) were the main viruses detected, while atypical bacteria represented 8% of all pathogens. Overall, a pathogen not represented on the quadriplex panel was detected in 43% samples. Positive test results were associated with faster medical decision (380 ± 234 vs 431 ± 238 min; P < 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (65% vs 78%; P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (10 ± 9 vs 12 ± 14 days; P = 0.006) than negative test results. Antibiotic therapy was administered to 42 of 43 of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-positive patients (98%) compared with 110 of 1,265 (9%) negative patients. This study validated the feasibility of this new diagnostic tool in high-volume EDs improving patient flow, antimicrobial decisions, and isolation strategies.IMPORTANCEThis study provides the first real-world evidence supporting the use of a broad multiplex PCR platform for respiratory pathogens directly at the point of care in a high-volume emergency department. By enabling the simultaneous detection of 14 viruses and atypical bacteria within 20 min, this system bridges a critical gap between laboratory diagnostics and bedside clinical decision-making. Its implementation proved feasible and reliable, improving patient flow, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection control measures. Nearly half of the pathogens identified would have been missed by conventional quadriplex assays, highlighting the added diagnostic value of broader syndromic coverage. These findings are of interest to both clinicians and microbiologists, as they provide pragmatic evidence to guide the integration of advanced molecular diagnostics into acute-care workflows and to optimize patient management during respiratory infection surges.
{"title":"Impact of multiplex PCR point-of-care platform implementation for respiratory pathogen detection in an emergency department with high daily patient volume.","authors":"Benjamin Bigaud, Nicolas Marjanovic, Luc Deroche, Bertrand Drugeon, Marvin Piot, Nicolas Leveque, Olivier Mimoz, Jérémy Guenezan","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01313-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01313-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) place a substantial burden on emergency departments (EDs) during winter outbreaks. Their microbiological diagnosis is currently based on either broad-spectrum molecular techniques performed in laboratory, with turnaround times incompatible with ED workflows, or point-of-care systems, restricted to SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and RSV (quadriplex panel). The Spotfire combines rapid result and syndromic approach (10 respiratory viruses and 4 atypical bacteria), but its added value in EDs remains unassessed. During the 2023 winter, trained nurses collected nasopharyngeal swabs from adult patients with LRTI symptoms and operated the Spotfire in the ED of the Poitiers University Hospital. We described the viral epidemiology and evaluated the impact and efficacy of this rapid broad-spectrum diagnosis by comparing the management of patients with or without respiratory pathogen detected. From 15 December 2023 to 15 March 2024, 1,320 samples were analyzed with Spotfire, with a median turnaround time of 37 min and 10 uninterpretable results. A total of 540 (41%) were positive. Influenza A (30.9%), rhinovirus/enterovirus (21.1%), and SARS-CoV-2 (18.7%) were the main viruses detected, while atypical bacteria represented 8% of all pathogens. Overall, a pathogen not represented on the quadriplex panel was detected in 43% samples. Positive test results were associated with faster medical decision (380 ± 234 vs 431 ± 238 min; <i>P</i> < 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (65% vs 78%; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (10 ± 9 vs 12 ± 14 days; <i>P</i> = 0.006) than negative test results. Antibiotic therapy was administered to 42 of 43 of <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i>-positive patients (98%) compared with 110 of 1,265 (9%) negative patients. This study validated the feasibility of this new diagnostic tool in high-volume EDs improving patient flow, antimicrobial decisions, and isolation strategies.IMPORTANCEThis study provides the first real-world evidence supporting the use of a broad multiplex PCR platform for respiratory pathogens directly at the point of care in a high-volume emergency department. By enabling the simultaneous detection of 14 viruses and atypical bacteria within 20 min, this system bridges a critical gap between laboratory diagnostics and bedside clinical decision-making. Its implementation proved feasible and reliable, improving patient flow, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection control measures. Nearly half of the pathogens identified would have been missed by conventional quadriplex assays, highlighting the added diagnostic value of broader syndromic coverage. These findings are of interest to both clinicians and microbiologists, as they provide pragmatic evidence to guide the integration of advanced molecular diagnostics into acute-care workflows and to optimize patient management during respiratory infection surges.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0131325"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802140/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00961-25
Sarah Gefroh, Briena Meier, Kelli Maddock
<p><p>Quality laboratory data are central to antimicrobial resistance detection in support of good patient care and for use in a One Health surveillance system. Here, we evaluated the Vitek-2 Compact AST-GP81 cards against Sensititre COMGP1F broth microdilution panels. A total of 51 <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. not <i>aureus/lugdunensis;</i> 30 <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Staphylococcus lugdunensis</i>; and 34 <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. were selected for testing. Overall performance of the Vitek-2 Compact was acceptable, with at least 96% essential agreement and 94% categorical agreement across organism groups, exceeding the minimum performance goal of ≥90% agreement; however, several antimicrobials did not meet minimum performance standards. For <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. not <i>aureus/lugdunsis,</i> minocycline failed entirely, precluding patient reporting and clindamycin required offline confirmatory testing. We observed unacceptable rates of minor errors if <i>Staphylococcus</i> cephalosporin breakpoints were used, whereas a surrogate agent produced consistent results between methods. Notably, we reaffirm that it is necessary to confirm any susceptible <i>Staphylococcus pseudintermedius</i> penicillin results with an induced nitrocefin β-lactamase test, especially if Sensititre COMPGP1F panels are used. Both test panels require updated antimicrobial offerings and dilution ranges to ensure a full range of test results can be reported. These updates should include consideration for test ranges that allow for on-scale quality control testing and translation across One Health sectors. Because antimicrobial susceptibility test results impact far more than single patient care in veterinary medicine, including human, herd, and environmental health, we advocate for the use of stringent antimicrobial susceptibility test method evaluation procedures in veterinary laboratories.IMPORTANCEAntimicrobial resistance is a critical threat to human and animal health globally. While our patient populations are different, we are connected by our shared environments and intertwined existence. As such, our antimicrobial susceptibility testing diagnostic and surveillance tools, as well as methods to evaluate their performance, should be uniform and capable of detecting critical antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. We evaluated the Vitek-2 Compact against our legacy Sensititre system and determined that accurate patient results and quality surveillance data could be produced using the Vitek-2 Compact. We used the evaluation method described in the Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook to demonstrate the utility of this method to peer veterinary laboratories. This publication importantly demonstrates that this evaluation procedure is scalable for veterinary applications. Furthermore, there is a need for updates to veterinary test panels as well as investments in and advancement of veterinary diagnostic tools, in support of a One Health approach to antimicrobia
{"title":"Veterinary method evaluation of Vitek-2 compact for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. and <i>Enterococcus</i> spp.","authors":"Sarah Gefroh, Briena Meier, Kelli Maddock","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00961-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00961-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality laboratory data are central to antimicrobial resistance detection in support of good patient care and for use in a One Health surveillance system. Here, we evaluated the Vitek-2 Compact AST-GP81 cards against Sensititre COMGP1F broth microdilution panels. A total of 51 <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. not <i>aureus/lugdunensis;</i> 30 <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Staphylococcus lugdunensis</i>; and 34 <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. were selected for testing. Overall performance of the Vitek-2 Compact was acceptable, with at least 96% essential agreement and 94% categorical agreement across organism groups, exceeding the minimum performance goal of ≥90% agreement; however, several antimicrobials did not meet minimum performance standards. For <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. not <i>aureus/lugdunsis,</i> minocycline failed entirely, precluding patient reporting and clindamycin required offline confirmatory testing. We observed unacceptable rates of minor errors if <i>Staphylococcus</i> cephalosporin breakpoints were used, whereas a surrogate agent produced consistent results between methods. Notably, we reaffirm that it is necessary to confirm any susceptible <i>Staphylococcus pseudintermedius</i> penicillin results with an induced nitrocefin β-lactamase test, especially if Sensititre COMPGP1F panels are used. Both test panels require updated antimicrobial offerings and dilution ranges to ensure a full range of test results can be reported. These updates should include consideration for test ranges that allow for on-scale quality control testing and translation across One Health sectors. Because antimicrobial susceptibility test results impact far more than single patient care in veterinary medicine, including human, herd, and environmental health, we advocate for the use of stringent antimicrobial susceptibility test method evaluation procedures in veterinary laboratories.IMPORTANCEAntimicrobial resistance is a critical threat to human and animal health globally. While our patient populations are different, we are connected by our shared environments and intertwined existence. As such, our antimicrobial susceptibility testing diagnostic and surveillance tools, as well as methods to evaluate their performance, should be uniform and capable of detecting critical antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. We evaluated the Vitek-2 Compact against our legacy Sensititre system and determined that accurate patient results and quality surveillance data could be produced using the Vitek-2 Compact. We used the evaluation method described in the Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook to demonstrate the utility of this method to peer veterinary laboratories. This publication importantly demonstrates that this evaluation procedure is scalable for veterinary applications. Furthermore, there is a need for updates to veterinary test panels as well as investments in and advancement of veterinary diagnostic tools, in support of a One Health approach to antimicrobia","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0096125"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802271/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145774249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Benjamin von Bredow, Matthew D Sims, Bobby L Boyanton
{"title":"Photo Quiz: A camper with fever, headache, and fatigue.","authors":"Benjamin von Bredow, Matthew D Sims, Bobby L Boyanton","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01370-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01370-25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"64 1","pages":"e0137025"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802166/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14Epub Date: 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01451-25
James E Kirby, Ramy Arnaout
Although artificial intelligence-particularly large-language models-receives daily attention, the application of AI to image-recognition challenges in clinical microbiology has been under development for several years. In the accompanying article, B. A. Mathison, K. Knight, J. Potts, B. Black, et al. (J Clin Microbiol 63:e01062-25, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01062-25) (in collaboration with ARUP Laboratories and TechCyte) describe a trained convolutional neural network (CNN) that reviews wet-mount parasitology smears with accuracy and analytical sensitivity exceeding that of a cohort of highly trained medical technologists. The impressive results were enabled by an extensive, globally sourced training set. These findings constitute Part II of the authors' earlier Journal of Clinical Microbiology publication on CNN-based diagnosis of trichrome-stained smears and provide a robust proof-of-concept for integrating AI into clinical microbiology workflows. We comment on the translatability of this technology to routine clinical laboratories.
尽管人工智能——尤其是大语言模型——每天都受到关注,但人工智能在临床微生物学图像识别挑战中的应用已经发展了好几年。在相应的文章中,b.a. Mathison, K. Knight, J. Potts, B. Black等人(J clinical Microbiol 63:e01062- 25,2025, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01062-25)(与ARUP实验室和TechCyte合作)描述了一个训练有素的卷积神经网络(CNN),其准确性和分析灵敏度超过了一群训练有素的医疗技术人员。令人印象深刻的结果是由广泛的、全球来源的训练集实现的。这些发现构成了作者早期在《临床微生物学杂志》上发表的基于cnn的三色染色涂片诊断的 II部分,并为将人工智能整合到临床微生物学工作流程中提供了强有力的概念验证。我们对这项技术在常规临床实验室的可翻译性发表评论。
{"title":"What's not to learn? AI meets parasitology.","authors":"James E Kirby, Ramy Arnaout","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01451-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01451-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although artificial intelligence-particularly large-language models-receives daily attention, the application of AI to image-recognition challenges in clinical microbiology has been under development for several years. In the accompanying article, B. A. Mathison, K. Knight, J. Potts, B. Black, et al. (J Clin Microbiol 63:e01062-25, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01062-25) (in collaboration with ARUP Laboratories and TechCyte) describe a trained convolutional neural network (CNN) that reviews wet-mount parasitology smears with accuracy and analytical sensitivity exceeding that of a cohort of highly trained medical technologists. The impressive results were enabled by an extensive, globally sourced training set. These findings constitute Part II of the authors' earlier Journal of Clinical Microbiology publication on CNN-based diagnosis of trichrome-stained smears and provide a robust proof-of-concept for integrating AI into clinical microbiology workflows. We comment on the translatability of this technology to routine clinical laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0145125"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802280/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14Epub Date: 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01647-25
Romney M Humphries
{"title":"Notes regarding the next era for the <i>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</i>.","authors":"Romney M Humphries","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01647-25","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01647-25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0164725"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802212/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}