Stéphanie Manel, Laetitia Mathon, David Mouillot, Morgane Bruno, Alice Valentini, Gilles Lecaillon, Anais Gudefin, Julie Deter, Pierre Boissery, Alicia Dalongeville
Coastal areas offer a diversity of habitats providing refugia and nursery for fish, promoting their biodiversity and associated contributions to people. Yet, natural coastlines are replaced by artificial infrastructures such as seaports and the influence of this artificialization on fish biodiversity remains poorly known. Here, we assessed fish biodiversity indicators using environmental DNA metabarcoding inside seaports and adjacent natural habitats including no-take marine reserves. We found that species assemblages within seaports were primarily influenced by their area and habitat. We detected a similar species richness in seaports and reserves during lockdown, but seaports host more threatened species than natural habitats. Yet, species turnover between seaports was lower than between natural areas, reflecting biotic homogenization. Seaport managers should consider that complexifying artificial infrastructures could increase habitat diversity and coastal fish biodiversity. Our study illustrates that eDNA-based indicators can be integrated in management and policy applications toward greener marine artificial infrastructures.
沿海地区提供了多种多样的栖息地,为鱼类提供了栖息地和育苗场,促进了鱼类的生物多样性,并为人类做出了相关贡献。然而,天然海岸线被海港等人工基础设施所取代,这种人工化对鱼类生物多样性的影响仍鲜为人知。在这里,我们利用环境 DNA 代谢编码技术评估了海港和邻近自然栖息地(包括禁渔海洋保护区)内的鱼类生物多样性指标。我们发现,海港内的物种组合主要受其面积和栖息地的影响。在封锁期间,我们在海港和保护区内发现了相似的物种丰富度,但海港比自然栖息地容纳了更多濒危物种。然而,海港之间的物种更替率低于自然区域之间的物种更替率,这反映了生物的同质性。海港管理者应考虑将人工基础设施复杂化,以增加栖息地多样性和沿海鱼类生物多样性。我们的研究表明,基于 eDNA 的指标可被纳入管理和政策应用中,以实现更环保的海洋人工基础设施。
{"title":"Benchmarking fish biodiversity of seaports with eDNA and nearby marine reserves","authors":"Stéphanie Manel, Laetitia Mathon, David Mouillot, Morgane Bruno, Alice Valentini, Gilles Lecaillon, Anais Gudefin, Julie Deter, Pierre Boissery, Alicia Dalongeville","doi":"10.1111/conl.13001","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coastal areas offer a diversity of habitats providing refugia and nursery for fish, promoting their biodiversity and associated contributions to people. Yet, natural coastlines are replaced by artificial infrastructures such as seaports and the influence of this artificialization on fish biodiversity remains poorly known. Here, we assessed fish biodiversity indicators using environmental DNA metabarcoding inside seaports and adjacent natural habitats including no-take marine reserves. We found that species assemblages within seaports were primarily influenced by their area and habitat. We detected a similar species richness in seaports and reserves during lockdown, but seaports host more threatened species than natural habitats. Yet, species turnover between seaports was lower than between natural areas, reflecting biotic homogenization. Seaport managers should consider that complexifying artificial infrastructures could increase habitat diversity and coastal fish biodiversity. Our study illustrates that eDNA-based indicators can be integrated in management and policy applications toward greener marine artificial infrastructures.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139551404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Spencer C. Schubert, Katherine E. Battaglia, Christina N. Blebea, Cole J. P. Seither, Helena L. Wehr, Karen D. Holl
As global tree-growing efforts have escalated in the past decade, copious failures and unintended consequences have prompted many reforestation best practices guidelines. The extent to which organizations have integrated these ecological and socioeconomic recommendations, however, remains uncertain. We reviewed websites of 99 intermediary organizations that promote and fund tree-growing projects to determine how well they report following best practices. Nearly half the organizations stated tree or area planting targets, but only 25% had measurable, time-bound objectives. Most organizations discussed the benefits local communities would receive from trees, but only 38% reported measures of these outcomes. Nonprofit organizations with greater prior experience converged more closely on best practices, and their level of scientific expertise was positively associated with clearer project selection standards. Although many tree-growing organizations acknowledge the importance of clear goals, local community involvement, and monitoring, our results raise questions regarding whether long-term benefits are being achieved and emphasize the need for stronger public accountability standards.
{"title":"Advances and shortfalls in applying best practices to global tree-growing efforts","authors":"Spencer C. Schubert, Katherine E. Battaglia, Christina N. Blebea, Cole J. P. Seither, Helena L. Wehr, Karen D. Holl","doi":"10.1111/conl.13002","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As global tree-growing efforts have escalated in the past decade, copious failures and unintended consequences have prompted many reforestation best practices guidelines. The extent to which organizations have integrated these ecological and socioeconomic recommendations, however, remains uncertain. We reviewed websites of 99 intermediary organizations that promote and fund tree-growing projects to determine how well they report following best practices. Nearly half the organizations stated tree or area planting targets, but only 25% had measurable, time-bound objectives. Most organizations discussed the benefits local communities would receive from trees, but only 38% reported measures of these outcomes. Nonprofit organizations with greater prior experience converged more closely on best practices, and their level of scientific expertise was positively associated with clearer project selection standards. Although many tree-growing organizations acknowledge the importance of clear goals, local community involvement, and monitoring, our results raise questions regarding whether long-term benefits are being achieved and emphasize the need for stronger public accountability standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139510962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Araceli Samaniego, Andrea E. Byrom, Markus Gronwald, John G. Innes, James T. Reardon
Predator Free 2050 (PF2050) is a government initiative aiming to eradicate selected invasive mammals (mustelids, rats, and possums) from New Zealand (NZ) by 2050. Selecting which of 32 introduced mammal species to include has received little evaluation, yet targeting a few species often results in perverse ecological outcomes given interactions within the invasive guild. We explore how PF2050 could be improved strategically by focusing on biodiversity outcomes instead of selectively targeting invasives, using rodents as an example. Current PF2050 targets include all rat species (Rattus exulans, R. norvegicus, and R. rattus), but not the house mouse (Mus musculus). Mice can be as damaging as rats when competition and predation are removed, negating benefits of rat removal. Multirodent eradications are more cost-effective and prevent mesopredator release. Using a case study, we show adding mice to a rat eradication would raise costs modestly, comparing favorably to independent mouse eradication later, which would be riskier and more socially and economically costly than the preceding rat eradication. Missing the opportunity to tackle all rodents simultaneously, leaving mice to multiply in numbers and impacts, could have serious environmental and socioeconomic consequences. Naïve eradication strategies neglecting ecological expertise risk biodiversity outcomes and NZ's eradication science reputation.
{"title":"Small mice create big problems: Why Predator Free New Zealand should include house mice and other pest species","authors":"Araceli Samaniego, Andrea E. Byrom, Markus Gronwald, John G. Innes, James T. Reardon","doi":"10.1111/conl.12996","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.12996","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predator Free 2050 (PF2050) is a government initiative aiming to eradicate selected invasive mammals (mustelids, rats, and possums) from New Zealand (NZ) by 2050. Selecting which of 32 introduced mammal species to include has received little evaluation, yet targeting a few species often results in perverse ecological outcomes given interactions within the invasive guild. We explore how PF2050 could be improved strategically by focusing on biodiversity outcomes instead of selectively targeting invasives, using rodents as an example. Current PF2050 targets include all rat species (<i>Rattus exulans</i>, <i>R. norvegicus</i>, and <i>R. rattus</i>), but not the house mouse (<i>Mus musculus</i>). Mice can be as damaging as rats when competition and predation are removed, negating benefits of rat removal. Multirodent eradications are more cost-effective and prevent mesopredator release. Using a case study, we show adding mice to a rat eradication would raise costs modestly, comparing favorably to independent mouse eradication later, which would be riskier and more socially and economically costly than the preceding rat eradication. Missing the opportunity to tackle all rodents simultaneously, leaving mice to multiply in numbers and impacts, could have serious environmental and socioeconomic consequences. Naïve eradication strategies neglecting ecological expertise risk biodiversity outcomes and NZ's eradication science reputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12996","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139431676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brianna Elliott, Jeremy J. Kiszka, Sylvain Bonhommeau, Umair Shahid, Rebecca Lent, Lauren Nelson, Andrew J. Read
In 1992, the UN banned the use of large-scale pelagic driftnets on the high seas (UNGA Resolution 46/215). Three decades later, however, drift gillnets remain one of the primary fishing gears in the Indian Ocean, accounting for approximately 30% of tuna catches in this ocean. Recent estimates indicate that several million small cetaceans have been killed in Indian Ocean gillnets over the past few decades. National agencies and the regional fisheries management organization charged with managing tuna fisheries, the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, have yet to effectively document the bycatch of small cetaceans in these fisheries. Here, we review current information on cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean drift gillnets and propose potential solutions to this important conservation issue.
{"title":"Bycatch in drift gillnet fisheries: A sink for Indian Ocean cetaceans","authors":"Brianna Elliott, Jeremy J. Kiszka, Sylvain Bonhommeau, Umair Shahid, Rebecca Lent, Lauren Nelson, Andrew J. Read","doi":"10.1111/conl.12997","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.12997","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 1992, the UN banned the use of large-scale pelagic driftnets on the high seas (UNGA Resolution 46/215). Three decades later, however, drift gillnets remain one of the primary fishing gears in the Indian Ocean, accounting for approximately 30% of tuna catches in this ocean. Recent estimates indicate that several million small cetaceans have been killed in Indian Ocean gillnets over the past few decades. National agencies and the regional fisheries management organization charged with managing tuna fisheries, the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, have yet to effectively document the bycatch of small cetaceans in these fisheries. Here, we review current information on cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean drift gillnets and propose potential solutions to this important conservation issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12997","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139091749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shelby L. Ziegler, Rachel O. Brooks, Lyall F. Bellquist, Jennifer E. Caselle, Steven G. Morgan, Timothy J. Mulligan, Benjamin I. Ruttenberg, Brice X. Semmens, Richard M. Starr, Joe Tyburczy, Dean E. Wendt, Andre Buchheister, Jose R. Marin Jarrin, Christina Pasparakis, Salvador J. Jorgensen, Jennifer A. Chiu, Jordan Colby, Connor L. Coscino, Leon Davis, Francine de Castro, Jack T. Elstner, Christopher Honeyman, Erica T. Jarvis Mason, Erin M. Johnston, Sadie L. Small, Jay Staton, Grant T. Waltz, Bonnie Basnett, Erin V. Satterthwaite, Helen Killeen, Connor D. Dibble, Scott L. Hamilton
A variety of criteria may influence the efficacy of networks of marine protected areas (MPA) designed to enhance biodiversity conservation and provide fisheries benefits. Meta-analyses have evaluated the influence of MPA attributes on abundance, biomass, and size structure of harvested species, reporting that MPA size, age, depth, and connectivity influence the strength of MPA responses. However, few empirical MPA evaluation studies have used consistent sampling methodology across multiple MPAs and years. Our collaborative fisheries research program systematically sampled 12 no-take or highly protective limited-take MPAs and paired fished reference areas across a network spanning 1100 km of coastline to evaluate the factors driving MPA efficacy across a large geographic region. We found that increased size and age consistently contributed to increased fish catch, biomass, and positive species responses inside MPAs, while accounting for factors such as latitude, primary productivity, and distance to the nearest MPA. Our study provides a model framework to collaboratively engage diverse stakeholders in fisheries research and provide high-quality data to assess the success of conservation strategies.
{"title":"Collaborative fisheries research reveals reserve size and age determine efficacy across a network of marine protected areas","authors":"Shelby L. Ziegler, Rachel O. Brooks, Lyall F. Bellquist, Jennifer E. Caselle, Steven G. Morgan, Timothy J. Mulligan, Benjamin I. Ruttenberg, Brice X. Semmens, Richard M. Starr, Joe Tyburczy, Dean E. Wendt, Andre Buchheister, Jose R. Marin Jarrin, Christina Pasparakis, Salvador J. Jorgensen, Jennifer A. Chiu, Jordan Colby, Connor L. Coscino, Leon Davis, Francine de Castro, Jack T. Elstner, Christopher Honeyman, Erica T. Jarvis Mason, Erin M. Johnston, Sadie L. Small, Jay Staton, Grant T. Waltz, Bonnie Basnett, Erin V. Satterthwaite, Helen Killeen, Connor D. Dibble, Scott L. Hamilton","doi":"10.1111/conl.13000","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A variety of criteria may influence the efficacy of networks of marine protected areas (MPA) designed to enhance biodiversity conservation and provide fisheries benefits. Meta-analyses have evaluated the influence of MPA attributes on abundance, biomass, and size structure of harvested species, reporting that MPA size, age, depth, and connectivity influence the strength of MPA responses. However, few empirical MPA evaluation studies have used consistent sampling methodology across multiple MPAs and years. Our collaborative fisheries research program systematically sampled 12 no-take or highly protective limited-take MPAs and paired fished reference areas across a network spanning 1100 km of coastline to evaluate the factors driving MPA efficacy across a large geographic region. We found that increased size and age consistently contributed to increased fish catch, biomass, and positive species responses inside MPAs, while accounting for factors such as latitude, primary productivity, and distance to the nearest MPA. Our study provides a model framework to collaboratively engage diverse stakeholders in fisheries research and provide high-quality data to assess the success of conservation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139091754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael R. Kearney, Hiromi Yagui, Ary A. Hoffmann, Ben L. Phillips
Translocation is an increasingly used tool in conservation management, but there is a risk that source populations are overcollected. The risk depends critically on the detection probability and the source population size. We quantified this risk for a wingless grasshopper population in a patch of remnant habitat in suburban Melbourne that was condemned to be cleared for housing development. We collected ∼2000 grasshoppers in five samples spread over 1 month and used the results to estimate the initial population size (∼3400) with high confidence. Despite our perception of substantially depleting the population, we removed only an estimated 60%, and this relatively high fecundity (∼50 eggs per lifetime) annual species had recovered by the following year to near its original density. Wild-to-wild translocation is likely to be a low-cost and effective strategy in the conservation of many invertebrates, and our findings highlight the feasibility of using natural source populations.
{"title":"What is the risk of overcollecting for translocation? An opportunistic assessment of a wingless grasshopper","authors":"Michael R. Kearney, Hiromi Yagui, Ary A. Hoffmann, Ben L. Phillips","doi":"10.1111/conl.12999","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.12999","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Translocation is an increasingly used tool in conservation management, but there is a risk that source populations are overcollected. The risk depends critically on the detection probability and the source population size. We quantified this risk for a wingless grasshopper population in a patch of remnant habitat in suburban Melbourne that was condemned to be cleared for housing development. We collected ∼2000 grasshoppers in five samples spread over 1 month and used the results to estimate the initial population size (∼3400) with high confidence. Despite our perception of substantially depleting the population, we removed only an estimated 60%, and this relatively high fecundity (∼50 eggs per lifetime) annual species had recovered by the following year to near its original density. Wild-to-wild translocation is likely to be a low-cost and effective strategy in the conservation of many invertebrates, and our findings highlight the feasibility of using natural source populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12999","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139061504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Snakes in Africa are responsible for over 20,000 deaths annually, their indiscriminate killing. As a result, snakes are vulnerable to human population increases even at low intensities. Thus, the predicted doubling of Africa's population by 2050 is likely to pose a disproportionate threat to snakes compared to other taxa. Here we quantify the current and future overlap of snake distributions and human population density under three scenarios of population growth. We find that by 2050, on average, 71% of snake ranges of conservation concern will overlap with areas occupied by ten or more people per km2, a 22% increase from 2020. In addition, the number of Least Concern species with most of their range within areas with high human population density will more than double, likely increasing the number of threatened species over the next decades. Our results call for immediate policy action targeting people's perceptions and fears of snakes, and incorporating snakes directly into development and conservation plans to reduce the impact of future urban expansions across Africa.
{"title":"The fear factor—Snakes in Africa might be at an alarming extinction risk","authors":"Harith Farooq, Jonas Geldmann","doi":"10.1111/conl.12998","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.12998","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Snakes in Africa are responsible for over 20,000 deaths annually, their indiscriminate killing. As a result, snakes are vulnerable to human population increases even at low intensities. Thus, the predicted doubling of Africa's population by 2050 is likely to pose a disproportionate threat to snakes compared to other taxa. Here we quantify the current and future overlap of snake distributions and human population density under three scenarios of population growth. We find that by 2050, on average, 71% of snake ranges of conservation concern will overlap with areas occupied by ten or more people per km<sup>2</sup>, a 22% increase from 2020. In addition, the number of Least Concern species with most of their range within areas with high human population density will more than double, likely increasing the number of threatened species over the next decades. Our results call for immediate policy action targeting people's perceptions and fears of snakes, and incorporating snakes directly into development and conservation plans to reduce the impact of future urban expansions across Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12998","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139061559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Moses F. Gee, Caio F. Kenup, Igor Debski, Alexandra Macdonald, Graeme A. Taylor, Rohan H. Clarke, Stefano Canessa, John G. Ewen, Johannes H. Fischer
Areas beyond national jurisdiction, or the high seas, are vital to life on Earth. However, the conservation of these areas, for example, through area-based management tools (ABMTs), is challenging, particularly when accounting for global change. Using decision science, integrated population models, and a Critically Endangered seabird (Kuaka; Pelecanoides whenuahouensis) as a case study, we evaluated potential ABMTs in the high seas under global change and different governance structures, while accounting for uncertainty and imperfect compliance. Our study highlighted that global change in these areas will likely cause population declines of ∼60% by 2050. However, decisive conservation action could cost-effectively address predicted declines, particularly when implemented as soon as possible and under the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty. We illustrate how decision science can transparently navigate a complex seascape of management decisions and we advocate for its wider integration in the management of the largest sections of our planet, the high seas.
{"title":"Decisive conservation action in areas beyond national jurisdiction is urgently required for seabird recovery in the face of global change","authors":"Moses F. Gee, Caio F. Kenup, Igor Debski, Alexandra Macdonald, Graeme A. Taylor, Rohan H. Clarke, Stefano Canessa, John G. Ewen, Johannes H. Fischer","doi":"10.1111/conl.12989","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.12989","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Areas beyond national jurisdiction, or the high seas, are vital to life on Earth. However, the conservation of these areas, for example, through area-based management tools (ABMTs), is challenging, particularly when accounting for global change. Using decision science, integrated population models, and a Critically Endangered seabird (Kuaka; <i>Pelecanoides whenuahouensis)</i> as a case study, we evaluated potential ABMTs in the high seas under global change and different governance structures, while accounting for uncertainty and imperfect compliance. Our study highlighted that global change in these areas will likely cause population declines of ∼60% by 2050. However, decisive conservation action could cost-effectively address predicted declines, particularly when implemented as soon as possible and under the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty. We illustrate how decision science can transparently navigate a complex seascape of management decisions and we advocate for its wider integration in the management of the largest sections of our planet, the high seas.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12989","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138442223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xinming Li, Bochi Wang, Jing Zhang, Geoffrey W. H. Davison, Nan Wang
Reeves's pheasant feathers are used to make headgears for the Chinese opera—Xiqu; however, this posed a considerable threat to the bird's population before it was banned from hunting/trade. It is unclear whether Xiqu-troupes currently use feathers from wild or captive breeding; therefore, we investigated their source and scale of feather utilization. Through interviews, we clarified the current status of feather-use by state-run troupes. We conducted a cluster analysis and established a “random forest” model using stable isotopes as variables to distinguish sources of feathers from Xiqu-troupes. Annual demand for feathers in China was estimated as 1159.4 pairs. Isotope analysis revealed that feathers used by Xiqu-troupes are likely derived from wild sources. We suggest strengthening the supervision of acquisition of Reeves's pheasant feathers and harvesting feathers through captive breeding. Stable isotope analysis can be an effective method for identifying the source of tail feathers, which will support law enforcement efforts.
{"title":"Conflict between cultural development and wildlife conservation: A potential threat to Reeves's pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii)","authors":"Xinming Li, Bochi Wang, Jing Zhang, Geoffrey W. H. Davison, Nan Wang","doi":"10.1111/conl.12995","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.12995","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reeves's pheasant feathers are used to make headgears for the Chinese opera—Xiqu; however, this posed a considerable threat to the bird's population before it was banned from hunting/trade. It is unclear whether Xiqu-troupes currently use feathers from wild or captive breeding; therefore, we investigated their source and scale of feather utilization. Through interviews, we clarified the current status of feather-use by state-run troupes. We conducted a cluster analysis and established a “random forest” model using stable isotopes as variables to distinguish sources of feathers from Xiqu-troupes. Annual demand for feathers in China was estimated as 1159.4 pairs. Isotope analysis revealed that feathers used by Xiqu-troupes are likely derived from wild sources. We suggest strengthening the supervision of acquisition of Reeves's pheasant feathers and harvesting feathers through captive breeding. Stable isotope analysis can be an effective method for identifying the source of tail feathers, which will support law enforcement efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12995","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138442222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher D. H. Thompson, Jessica J. Meeuwig, Alan M. Friedlander, Enric Sala
<p>The pelagic ocean is Earth's largest habitat, constituting 99% of the global biosphere by volume, directly or indirectly supporting most marine life, and supplying the majority of fish consumed by humans (Game et al., <span>2009</span>; Pauly et al., <span>2002</span>). However, the world's pelagic fauna is globally declining largely as a result of unsustainable fishing (Pauly & Zeller, <span>2016</span>). Industrial fishing has reduced the populations of tunas and their relatives by 60% and of oceanic sharks and rays by 71% over the past half century (Juan-Jordá et al., <span>2011</span>; Pacoureau et al., <span>2021</span>). Declines in pelagic wildlife weaken ecosystem functioning, drive biodiversity loss, and undermine food security and economic stability for many of the world's people.</p><p>Remote regions of the ocean that remain less impacted by humans are refuges for mobile and heavily targeted species. These regions harbor wildlife assemblages with higher diversity, greater abundance, larger size, and increased biomass, and can yield valuable insights into ecological processes (Campbell et al., <span>2020</span>; Juhel et al., <span>2019</span>; Thompson & Meeuwig, <span>2022</span>). Remote regions offer a glimpse of what the ocean was like prior to large-scale anthropogenic impact, a source from which the rest of the ocean can be regenerated, and a benchmark for marine protected areas (MPAs) and fisheries management. However, with human impacts now extending across the global ocean (Halpern et al., <span>2008</span>; Tickler et al., <span>2018</span>), remote areas are increasingly threatened. Urgent attention is required to ensure that remote regions avoid mirroring the degradation seen in areas more proximate to humans.</p><p>Our knowledge of the pelagic ocean remains limited relative to shallow coastal habitats, making prioritizing conservation efforts difficult. This is especially the case in remote regions where scientific information is even more scarce. We do know, however, that pelagic species associate strongly with bathymetric features such as seamounts, undersea canyons, and oceanic islands (Bouchet, <span>2015</span>; Morato et al., <span>2010</span>; Thompson et al., <span>2021</span>). Both physical and biological drivers make these features important locations for foraging, reproduction, navigation, and other essential functions of pelagic wildlife (Garrigue et al., <span>2015</span>; Maguire et al., <span>2023</span>; Rogers, <span>2018</span>). Seamounts are particularly important to large pelagic animals and often hold relatively high densities of threatened and commercially important species such as sharks, tunas, and billfishes, some of which are generally highly mobile but show high residency at these features (Morato et al., <span>2008</span>; Wright et al., <span>2021</span>). However, the high economic value and conservative life histories of these species mean fishing can quickly decimate seamount co
中上层海洋是地球上最大的栖息地,占全球生物圈总量的99%,直接或间接支持大多数海洋生物,并供应人类消费的大部分鱼类(Game et al., 2009;Pauly et al., 2002)。然而,由于不可持续的捕捞,世界上的远洋动物在全球范围内正在减少(Pauly &泽勒,2016)。在过去的半个世纪里,工业化捕鱼使金枪鱼及其近亲的数量减少了60%,海洋鲨鱼和鳐鱼的数量减少了71% (juan - jord<e:1>等人,2011;Pacoureau et al., 2021)。远洋野生动物的减少削弱了生态系统功能,导致生物多样性丧失,并破坏了世界上许多人的粮食安全和经济稳定。受人类影响较小的海洋偏远地区是流动和重点目标物种的避难所。这些地区拥有多样性更高、丰度更高、规模更大、生物量更高的野生动物群落,可以对生态过程产生有价值的见解(Campbell et al., 2020;Juhel et al., 2019;汤普森,Meeuwig, 2022)。偏远地区让人们得以一窥大规模人为影响之前的海洋面貌,是海洋其他部分得以再生的来源,也是海洋保护区和渔业管理的基准。然而,随着人类影响现在扩展到全球海洋(Halpern et al., 2008;Tickler等人,2018),偏远地区受到的威胁越来越大。需要紧急注意,以确保偏远地区避免出现与人类更接近的地区出现的退化现象。相对于浅海栖息地,我们对远洋海洋的了解仍然有限,这使得优先保护工作变得困难。在科学信息更加匮乏的偏远地区尤其如此。然而,我们确实知道,远洋物种与海底山、海底峡谷和海洋岛屿等深海特征密切相关(Bouchet, 2015;Morato et al., 2010;Thompson et al., 2021)。物理和生物驱动因素使这些特征成为觅食、繁殖、导航和其他重要功能的重要场所(Garrigue et al., 2015;Maguire et al., 2023;罗杰斯,2018)。海底山对大型远洋动物尤其重要,通常拥有相对高密度的受威胁和商业上重要的物种,如鲨鱼、金枪鱼和长嘴鱼,其中一些通常是高流动性的,但在这些特征上显示出很高的居住率(Morato等人,2008;Wright et al., 2021)。然而,这些物种的高经济价值和保守的生活史意味着捕捞会迅速摧毁海底山群落。因此,靠近人类的海底山群落往往首先退化(Clark, 1999)。据估计,全球海洋中有37,889个海山,但只有不到4%被调查过(Yesson et al., 2021;此外,不到6%位于完全和高度保护的海洋保护区(mpatlas.org;groud - colvert et al., 2021)。因此,海底山的保护是一个重要的保护机会。重要的是,不同的水深结构支持不同的组合(Thompson等,2021),因此应该包括一系列远程结构,以确保代表性保护。对地下特征的保护将有利于远洋生物多样性,并为保护重要的底栖鱼类群落(Galbraith et al., 2021)和许多脆弱的底栖海洋生态系统(如深礁群落)提供重大好处,因为它们在这些特征上的浓度更高(Rogers, 2018)。许多海山,包括靠近人类种群的海山,具有重要的生物多样性保护价值(Morato et al., 2010)。然而,我们认为,考虑到目标物种的高丰度,以及这些地方对生物多样性的不成比例的贡献,以及我们对人类影响如何改变海洋的理解,迄今为止退化有限的偏远海山是保护的重点。图1打开图形查看器powerpoint全球海洋保护区(浅绿色;unep - wcmc,IUCN, 2022)与Yesson等人(2020)定义的海底山(蓝色三角形)的全球分布重叠。这种分布显示了沿构造边界和海底地质活跃部分的集中。设计良好、管理良好、受到高度保护的海洋保护区可以明显阻止和扭转海洋野生动物数量的下降,增加邻近水域的渔业产量,并增强对气候变化的适应能力(Edgar et al., 2014;Roberts et al., 2017;萨拉,Giakoumi, 2018)。偏远和大规模保护的结合在生物多样性保护中特别有效(Juhel et al., 2018),大型全面和高度保护的海洋保护区对专属经济区内的海底山保护做出了重大贡献。 有充分的科学证据表明,到2030年需要保护至少30%的陆地和海洋(Dinerstein等人,2019;O’leary et al., 2016),这一承诺现已在2022年12月批准的《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》中作出。联合国大会最近还制定了一项条约,以促进国家管辖范围以外地区海洋生物多样性的养护和可持续利用(ABNJs;Stokstad, 2023;联合国大会,2023年)。该文书为在非洲国家保护区实施海洋保护区提供了法律框架。由于58%的海底山位于ABNJs,其中不到1%位于高度保护的海洋保护区,偏远的海底山是实现生物多样性保护承诺的主要目标。此外,最近的多国条约已经认识到这些特征的重要性,并正在合作保护国家和国际水域的区域。例如,东热带太平洋海洋走廊(CMAR)倡议横跨哥斯达黎加、巴拿马、哥伦比亚和厄瓜多尔专属经济区(eez)的岛屿、海岸和海山链。Perú和智利还共同努力保护纳斯卡和萨拉斯Gómez海脊系统,该系统横跨两国的专属经济区及其之间的国际水域(Wagner et al., 2021)。这些渐进的步骤提供了一个明确和积极的例子,说明国家之间的合作是可能的,并且可以保护宝贵的海洋栖息地。日益增加的威胁和对自然世界重要性的日益认识,加强了对全球自然环境保护的要求,并使之成为必要。在偏远的海底山,高密度的生物和通常高度流动的远洋动物的居住使这些地点容易受到人为破坏,但也是理想的保护目标(Morato等人,2010;Wright et al., 2021)。鉴于有关偏远海底山重要性的大量证据,对它们的保护是维持远洋野生动物种群的关键一步,并将使利用它们的许多物种受益,包括我们自己。
{"title":"Remote seamounts are key conservation priorities for pelagic wildlife","authors":"Christopher D. H. Thompson, Jessica J. Meeuwig, Alan M. Friedlander, Enric Sala","doi":"10.1111/conl.12993","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.12993","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pelagic ocean is Earth's largest habitat, constituting 99% of the global biosphere by volume, directly or indirectly supporting most marine life, and supplying the majority of fish consumed by humans (Game et al., <span>2009</span>; Pauly et al., <span>2002</span>). However, the world's pelagic fauna is globally declining largely as a result of unsustainable fishing (Pauly & Zeller, <span>2016</span>). Industrial fishing has reduced the populations of tunas and their relatives by 60% and of oceanic sharks and rays by 71% over the past half century (Juan-Jordá et al., <span>2011</span>; Pacoureau et al., <span>2021</span>). Declines in pelagic wildlife weaken ecosystem functioning, drive biodiversity loss, and undermine food security and economic stability for many of the world's people.</p><p>Remote regions of the ocean that remain less impacted by humans are refuges for mobile and heavily targeted species. These regions harbor wildlife assemblages with higher diversity, greater abundance, larger size, and increased biomass, and can yield valuable insights into ecological processes (Campbell et al., <span>2020</span>; Juhel et al., <span>2019</span>; Thompson & Meeuwig, <span>2022</span>). Remote regions offer a glimpse of what the ocean was like prior to large-scale anthropogenic impact, a source from which the rest of the ocean can be regenerated, and a benchmark for marine protected areas (MPAs) and fisheries management. However, with human impacts now extending across the global ocean (Halpern et al., <span>2008</span>; Tickler et al., <span>2018</span>), remote areas are increasingly threatened. Urgent attention is required to ensure that remote regions avoid mirroring the degradation seen in areas more proximate to humans.</p><p>Our knowledge of the pelagic ocean remains limited relative to shallow coastal habitats, making prioritizing conservation efforts difficult. This is especially the case in remote regions where scientific information is even more scarce. We do know, however, that pelagic species associate strongly with bathymetric features such as seamounts, undersea canyons, and oceanic islands (Bouchet, <span>2015</span>; Morato et al., <span>2010</span>; Thompson et al., <span>2021</span>). Both physical and biological drivers make these features important locations for foraging, reproduction, navigation, and other essential functions of pelagic wildlife (Garrigue et al., <span>2015</span>; Maguire et al., <span>2023</span>; Rogers, <span>2018</span>). Seamounts are particularly important to large pelagic animals and often hold relatively high densities of threatened and commercially important species such as sharks, tunas, and billfishes, some of which are generally highly mobile but show high residency at these features (Morato et al., <span>2008</span>; Wright et al., <span>2021</span>). However, the high economic value and conservative life histories of these species mean fishing can quickly decimate seamount co","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12993","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138442221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}