John A. Vucetich, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Robyn Wilson, L. Mark Elbroch, Adam Feltz, Thomas Offer-Westort
Conservation professionals expect increased attempts to weaken the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) during the second Trump administration. As such, it is important to understand Americans’ level of support for the ESA. Prior research indicates that support for the ESA remained consistently strong across four studies conducted over a two-decade period, 1996–2015. The research presented here extends those observations to six studies conducted over a three-decade period, 1996–2025. We find that support of the ESA over that period has remained consistently high, at about 84%, and opposition has remained consistently low, at about 12%. We also report on other trends and patterns in support for the ESA, highlighting high and growing support for the ESA among politically conservative people and the absence of any rural–urban divide in support for the ESA.
{"title":"Support for the US Endangered Species Act Is High and Steady Over the Past Three Decades","authors":"John A. Vucetich, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Robyn Wilson, L. Mark Elbroch, Adam Feltz, Thomas Offer-Westort","doi":"10.1111/conl.13111","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13111","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conservation professionals expect increased attempts to weaken the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) during the second Trump administration. As such, it is important to understand Americans’ level of support for the ESA. Prior research indicates that support for the ESA remained consistently strong across four studies conducted over a two-decade period, 1996–2015. The research presented here extends those observations to six studies conducted over a three-decade period, 1996–2025. We find that support of the ESA over that period has remained consistently high, at about 84%, and opposition has remained consistently low, at about 12%. We also report on other trends and patterns in support for the ESA, highlighting high and growing support for the ESA among politically conservative people and the absence of any rural–urban divide in support for the ESA.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13111","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144289285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Timothy Kuiper, Iain Olivier, Julie Gane, Res Altwegg
Human behavior shapes both our impact on nature and the success of solutions to safeguard it. We used crime opportunity and deterrence theory, together with methods from epidemiology, to link space–time patterns in 560 rhino poaching incidents (2011–2021) to poacher and ranger behavior in a South African rhino stronghold. Poaching activity was significantly associated with proximity to ranger camps. Together with supplementary evidence we present from internal investigations, this suggests that criminal syndicates collude with some rangers to facilitate poaching. Poachers repeatedly targeted specific regions of the reserve for set periods before shifting, mirroring the “near-repeat” behavior observed for other crimes. Poachers also avoided tourist activity and minimized time on the reserve. Results suggest poachers strategically leverage space–time variation in opportunity and risk. Solutions based on these behavioral insights include early response to space–time clusters of poaching, spatially targeted implementation of rhino dehorning, and bolstering ranger resilience to the corrupting influence of criminal syndicates.
{"title":"Colluding rhino poachers exploit space–time variation in opportunity and risk","authors":"Timothy Kuiper, Iain Olivier, Julie Gane, Res Altwegg","doi":"10.1111/conl.13106","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13106","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human behavior shapes both our impact on nature and the success of solutions to safeguard it. We used crime opportunity and deterrence theory, together with methods from epidemiology, to link space–time patterns in 560 rhino poaching incidents (2011–2021) to poacher and ranger behavior in a South African rhino stronghold. Poaching activity was significantly associated with proximity to ranger camps. Together with supplementary evidence we present from internal investigations, this suggests that criminal syndicates collude with some rangers to facilitate poaching. Poachers repeatedly targeted specific regions of the reserve for set periods before shifting, mirroring the “near-repeat” behavior observed for other crimes. Poachers also avoided tourist activity and minimized time on the reserve. Results suggest poachers strategically leverage space–time variation in opportunity and risk. Solutions based on these behavioral insights include early response to space–time clusters of poaching, spatially targeted implementation of rhino dehorning, and bolstering ranger resilience to the corrupting influence of criminal syndicates.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13106","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Morena Mills, Marie V. Touchon, Elisa Denis, Sarah Milligan, Yasmeen Zuffetti, Zara Ahmad, Zoya Husain, Sushma Shrestha Sangat, Stefan Gelcich, Selma Lendelvo, Bharati Pathak, Alifereti Tawake, Michael B. Mascia, Solofo Nandrianina Ralaimihoatra, Thomas Pienkowski, Matthew Clark, Arundhati Jagadish
Community-based natural resource management is a common strategy for conserving biodiversity, but little is known about how such initiatives can scale appropriately and widely. We interviewed 80 experts across 5 widely adopted community-based initiatives (in Chile, Nepal, Namibia, Madagascar, and Fiji) to understand their perspectives on the drivers of adoption and spread. We used general elimination methodology and diffusion of innovation theory to identify and rule out possible explanations. Factors consistently considered influential were economic and social benefits, compatibility with needs, support and facilitation by extension agencies, and the presence of international organizations. Initiatives aiming to scale should be designed to be flexible and aligned with adopters’ needs, and external organizations should coordinate resources for scaling out. Dependence on external support underscores the need for quality assistance, good practices by external actors, and understanding power relations and fairness, as well as the need to temper donor and policy expectations of scaling beyond supported and appropriate sites.
{"title":"Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key","authors":"Morena Mills, Marie V. Touchon, Elisa Denis, Sarah Milligan, Yasmeen Zuffetti, Zara Ahmad, Zoya Husain, Sushma Shrestha Sangat, Stefan Gelcich, Selma Lendelvo, Bharati Pathak, Alifereti Tawake, Michael B. Mascia, Solofo Nandrianina Ralaimihoatra, Thomas Pienkowski, Matthew Clark, Arundhati Jagadish","doi":"10.1111/conl.13100","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13100","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Community-based natural resource management is a common strategy for conserving biodiversity, but little is known about how such initiatives can scale appropriately and widely. We interviewed 80 experts across 5 widely adopted community-based initiatives (in Chile, Nepal, Namibia, Madagascar, and Fiji) to understand their perspectives on the drivers of adoption and spread. We used general elimination methodology and diffusion of innovation theory to identify and rule out possible explanations. Factors consistently considered influential were economic and social benefits, compatibility with needs, support and facilitation by extension agencies, and the presence of international organizations. Initiatives aiming to scale should be designed to be flexible and aligned with adopters’ needs, and external organizations should coordinate resources for scaling out. Dependence on external support underscores the need for quality assistance, good practices by external actors, and understanding power relations and fairness, as well as the need to temper donor and policy expectations of scaling beyond supported and appropriate sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144197156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zoë E. Lieb, Erik Meijaard, Jedediah F. Brodie, Adi Shabrani, Jayasilan Mohd-Azlan, Jatna Supriatna, Matthew John Struebig, Nicolas J. Deere, Katie L. Spencer, Suipeng Heon, Lok-Jinn Wong, Suzika Juiling, Andrew Hearn, Camille N. Z. Coudrat, Agus Sudibyo Jati, Matthew Linkie, Dusit Ngoprasert, Dhritiman Das, Oliver R. Wearn, Russell J. Gray, Al John C. Cabanas, Andaman Chankhao, Apinya Saisamorn, Badrul Azhar, Benjamin P. Y.-H. Lee, Benoit Goossens, Carl Traeholt, David W. MacDonald, Emilia A. Lastica-Ternura, Fernando Garcia-Gil, Freddy Pattiselanno, Gabriella Fredriksson, Glyn Davies, Harry Hilser, Jamiee Wheelhouse, Jan van der Ploeg, John Carlo Redeña-Santos, Jonathan M. Moore, Karmila Parakkasi, Laura Marie Berman, Samuel Xin Tham Lee, Liam J. Hughes, Lukemann Haqeem Alen, Marc Ancrenaz, Marcus A. H. Chua, Markus Handschuh, Matthew Ward, Mohamad Arif Rifqi, Mohammad Aliyuddin Bin Jaini, Muhammad Syazwan Bin Omar, Nantachai Pongpattananurak, NayMyo Shwe, Olivia Z. Daniel, Pablo Sinovas, Parag Deka, Radinal, Ret Thaung, Robert M. Ewers, Romain Legrand, Ronglarp Sukmasuang, Sally Soo Kaicheen, Salwa Khalid, Saw Soe Aung, Sheherazade Sheherazade, Stuart J. Davies, Thiemo Braasch, Thomas N. E. Gray, Tim Redford, Ulmar Grafe, Xiaoyang Song, Matthew Scott Luskin
The 2018 arrival of African swine fever (ASF) in China was followed by reports of wild pig deaths across most countries in Southeast Asia. However, the magnitude and duration of population-level impacts of ASF on wild pig species remain unclear. To elucidate the spatiotemporal spread of ASF in the region for native pig species, we gathered qualitative information on wild pig population dynamics in Southeast Asia between 2018 and 2024 from 88 expert elicitation questionnaires representing sites in 11 countries. Peak reported population declines occurred in 2021 and 2022, with more than half of respondents reporting declining wild pig populations, far higher than in earlier years. The reported declines waned to 44.23% in 2024, whereas simultaneously, the number of populations reported to be “increasing” increased from 11.3%–13.2% in 2019–2022 to 28.9% in 2024. These reports suggest that the ASF outbreak may have peaked for wild boars and bearded pigs in mainland Southeast Asia, Borneo, and Sumatra, with some subsequent recovery. However, the disease is still expanding into the ranges of island endemic species, such as new reports for the Sulawesi warty pig (Sus celebensis) in September of 2024. Island endemics remain particularly vulnerable to extinction from ASF and require urgent monitoring and conservation action.
{"title":"Mapping Multiple Wild Pig Species’ Population Dynamics in Southeast Asia During the African Swine Fever Outbreak (2018–2024)","authors":"Zoë E. Lieb, Erik Meijaard, Jedediah F. Brodie, Adi Shabrani, Jayasilan Mohd-Azlan, Jatna Supriatna, Matthew John Struebig, Nicolas J. Deere, Katie L. Spencer, Suipeng Heon, Lok-Jinn Wong, Suzika Juiling, Andrew Hearn, Camille N. Z. Coudrat, Agus Sudibyo Jati, Matthew Linkie, Dusit Ngoprasert, Dhritiman Das, Oliver R. Wearn, Russell J. Gray, Al John C. Cabanas, Andaman Chankhao, Apinya Saisamorn, Badrul Azhar, Benjamin P. Y.-H. Lee, Benoit Goossens, Carl Traeholt, David W. MacDonald, Emilia A. Lastica-Ternura, Fernando Garcia-Gil, Freddy Pattiselanno, Gabriella Fredriksson, Glyn Davies, Harry Hilser, Jamiee Wheelhouse, Jan van der Ploeg, John Carlo Redeña-Santos, Jonathan M. Moore, Karmila Parakkasi, Laura Marie Berman, Samuel Xin Tham Lee, Liam J. Hughes, Lukemann Haqeem Alen, Marc Ancrenaz, Marcus A. H. Chua, Markus Handschuh, Matthew Ward, Mohamad Arif Rifqi, Mohammad Aliyuddin Bin Jaini, Muhammad Syazwan Bin Omar, Nantachai Pongpattananurak, NayMyo Shwe, Olivia Z. Daniel, Pablo Sinovas, Parag Deka, Radinal, Ret Thaung, Robert M. Ewers, Romain Legrand, Ronglarp Sukmasuang, Sally Soo Kaicheen, Salwa Khalid, Saw Soe Aung, Sheherazade Sheherazade, Stuart J. Davies, Thiemo Braasch, Thomas N. E. Gray, Tim Redford, Ulmar Grafe, Xiaoyang Song, Matthew Scott Luskin","doi":"10.1111/conl.13105","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13105","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 2018 arrival of African swine fever (ASF) in China was followed by reports of wild pig deaths across most countries in Southeast Asia. However, the magnitude and duration of population-level impacts of ASF on wild pig species remain unclear. To elucidate the spatiotemporal spread of ASF in the region for native pig species, we gathered qualitative information on wild pig population dynamics in Southeast Asia between 2018 and 2024 from 88 expert elicitation questionnaires representing sites in 11 countries. Peak reported population declines occurred in 2021 and 2022, with more than half of respondents reporting declining wild pig populations, far higher than in earlier years. The reported declines waned to 44.23% in 2024, whereas simultaneously, the number of populations reported to be “increasing” increased from 11.3%–13.2% in 2019–2022 to 28.9% in 2024. These reports suggest that the ASF outbreak may have peaked for wild boars and bearded pigs in mainland Southeast Asia, Borneo, and Sumatra, with some subsequent recovery. However, the disease is still expanding into the ranges of island endemic species, such as new reports for the Sulawesi warty pig (<i>Sus celebensis</i>) in September of 2024. Island endemics remain particularly vulnerable to extinction from ASF and require urgent monitoring and conservation action.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13105","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144197319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>With the stated aim to help rewilding “remain globally relevant,” Derham et al. (<span>2025</span>) attempt to align the rewilding movement with Indigenous-led land care. They do this by seeking to fit an alternative meaning for the word “<i>wild</i>” as “<i>self-willed</i>.” However, phonetically similar in modern English, these words have distinct Proto-Indo-European roots and there is no etymological basis for this shift (Liberman <span>2005</span>). It was first proposed by Nash (<span>1989</span>) to spin an alternative definition to “wilderness” and later applied to “<i>wild</i>” by Griffiths (<span>2007</span>) in her poetic evaluation of the connection between human society and the natural world, in which she sought to inject beauty into the idea of wilderness and reconcile it with the fact that Indigenous people have lived in what the west has denoted as wilderness for millennia.</p><p>As Cronon (<span>1996</span>) points out, the idea of wilderness is culturally constructed, with deep roots in the human psyche and in Christianity. It is a place of Satan (the enemy of humanity), of wild beasts (Old English: <i>wild-deor</i>—a place of wild deer) in the Book of Exodus. Attempts to redefine the words are similarly cultural and reflect attempts to preserve the use of the words in the face of an increasing awareness by western ecologists of the deep interconnectedness between Indigenous peoples and the health of their lands.</p><p>Conservation is a multifaceted concept that generally refers to the protection, preservation, management, and care of our environment. Conservation has its roots in the writings and ideas of Thoreau and Muir, two deeply religious figures who deified nature and frequently invoked the “<i>wild</i>” to describe the majesty they saw in nature. The true definition of “<i>wild</i>” is to be in a state of nature, not tame, not domesticated: land that is uncultivated and uninhabited by humans (Oxford English Dictionary <span>2024</span>). As the name suggests, rewilding seeks to make a place “<i>wild</i>” again. It is a branch of conservation that has focused almost universally on strategies that reduce human intervention in nature over time. It is the discrete attempt to dehumanize our environment—to remove human influence from it and “return” it to its natural state.</p><p>Names are important, because they frame how something is perceived and understood. The words used in naming can, thus, reinforce existing power structures, perpetuate stereotypes, and exclude or marginalize certain groups. “Pro-choice” or “pro-life,” “climate change” or “global warming,” “illegal aliens” or “undocumented immigrants,” “rewilding” or “biocultural restoration”: Each of these names preloads us with ideas that influence how we think and feel (Gann and Matlock <span>2014</span>). They influence the choices we make, actions we take, and the rationale we use to justify those decisions.</p><p>Humans have influenced around 80% of the Earth's
Derham等人(2025)的目标是帮助野化“保持全球相关性”,他们试图将野化运动与土著主导的土地保护结合起来。他们这样做的方式是为“狂野”一词寻找另一种含义,即“任性的”。然而,这些词在现代英语中语音相似,有明显的原始印欧语系词根,这种转变没有词源学基础(Liberman 2005)。纳什(1989)首先提出了“荒野”的另一种定义,后来格里菲斯(2007)在她对人类社会与自然世界之间关系的诗意评价中将其应用于“野生”,她试图将美注入荒野的概念,并将其与土著居民在西方所称的荒野中生活了数千年的事实相调和。正如克罗侬(1996)所指出的那样,荒野的概念是文化建构的,深深植根于人类的心灵和基督教。在《出埃及记》中,它是撒旦(人类的敌人)和野兽(古英语:wild-deor -野鹿的地方)的地方。重新定义这些词的尝试同样具有文化意义,反映了西方生态学家日益意识到土著人民与其土地健康之间的深刻相互联系,他们试图保留这些词的使用。保育是一个多方面的概念,一般指保护、保存、管理和照顾我们的环境。自然保护起源于梭罗和缪尔的著作和思想,这两位笃信宗教的人物将自然神化,经常用“野性”来形容他们在大自然中看到的威严。“野生”的真正定义是处于自然状态,而不是被驯服或驯化的:未开垦和无人居住的土地(牛津英语词典2024)。正如它的名字所暗示的那样,野化试图让一个地方再次变得“野性”。它是自然保护的一个分支,几乎普遍关注随着时间的推移减少人类对自然干预的策略。这是一种使我们的环境非人化的尝试——消除人类对环境的影响,“回归”到自然状态。名字很重要,因为它们构成了人们对事物的感知和理解。因此,在命名中使用的词语可能会加强现有的权力结构,使刻板印象永久化,并排斥或边缘化某些群体。“支持堕胎”还是“反对堕胎”,“气候变化”还是“全球变暖”,“非法移民”还是“非法移民”,“野生化”还是“生物文化恢复”:这些名字中的每一个都预先给我们灌输了影响我们思考和感受的想法(江恩和马特洛克,2014)。它们影响着我们做出的选择、采取的行动,以及我们用来证明这些决定的理由。人类已经影响了大约80%的地球表面至少12000年(Ellis et al. 2021)。在大多数情况下,用来定义我们目前面临的环境危机的生物多样性和生态基准是人类与环境长期相互作用的产物。它们是人性化的,不是野生的。将环境保护定义为重新放野,忽略了人类在创造、塑造和维护健康环境方面的关键作用。它的使用造成了阻碍土著主导的护理和管理的障碍。这既不真实,也无益。当前环境危机的解决方案不是厌恶人类,也不是笛卡尔式的人与自然的划分。它要求我们承认并承担我们对土地的义务,这是土著人民深切认识到的。事实上,Derham等人(2025)认识到了这一点,并提出了优秀的案例研究,证明了人与环境的相互联系。他们提出了一个强有力的理由,反对“野生”的神话,支持一个更合适的术语(如生物文化恢复)。相反,在重新野生化和土著实践之间调和的过程中,他们回顾了欧洲和英国殖民土著人民的可怕的非人性化的比喻、思想和政策。在那个时代,非土著思想家把我们看作是野生动物,几乎没有(如果有的话)人类。经过几个世纪的伤害,我们仍然被保护社区的某些部门认为是野生自然的一部分,这是一种侮辱。对“重返荒野”一词的承诺比对和解和真相的承诺更强烈,这是一种侮辱。我们的知识和文化仍然被用来有意或无意地使我们失去人性,这是一种侮辱。非土著学者仍然经常写关于我们的文章,而不是和我们一起写,这是一种侮辱。 虽然Derham等人(2025)对他们的论文进行了迟来的简短更正,指出他们的手稿中有土著居民的评论,但应该强制要求研究集中在土著人民、思想和他们的土地上,以及对土著主权、承认和和解具有强烈影响的研究。不应该在没有土著共同作者或明确承认与土著人民就研究内容进行仔细磋商(他们可能会拒绝共同作者)的情况下发表。当土著合作被拒绝时,为了获得充分和透明的理解,应该明确说明那些被咨询的人是否同意或不同意中心主题。环境健康随着土著自治的增加而增加(Dawson等人,2024年),而不是因为为了保持“全球相关性”而强制将野生化与土著实践结合起来。这是因为土著人民关心和了解他们的土地。我们知道如何适当地使我们的土地人性化。在我们需要授权的时候,野化的标签只会剥夺我们的权力。如果目标是支持土著社区增进环境健康,那么就应该采用真实的名称,例如生物文化恢复或土著主导的土地保护。
{"title":"Rewilding and Indigenous-Led Land Care Are Not Compatible Ideas","authors":"Fletcher Michael-Shawn","doi":"10.1111/conl.13107","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13107","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the stated aim to help rewilding “remain globally relevant,” Derham et al. (<span>2025</span>) attempt to align the rewilding movement with Indigenous-led land care. They do this by seeking to fit an alternative meaning for the word “<i>wild</i>” as “<i>self-willed</i>.” However, phonetically similar in modern English, these words have distinct Proto-Indo-European roots and there is no etymological basis for this shift (Liberman <span>2005</span>). It was first proposed by Nash (<span>1989</span>) to spin an alternative definition to “wilderness” and later applied to “<i>wild</i>” by Griffiths (<span>2007</span>) in her poetic evaluation of the connection between human society and the natural world, in which she sought to inject beauty into the idea of wilderness and reconcile it with the fact that Indigenous people have lived in what the west has denoted as wilderness for millennia.</p><p>As Cronon (<span>1996</span>) points out, the idea of wilderness is culturally constructed, with deep roots in the human psyche and in Christianity. It is a place of Satan (the enemy of humanity), of wild beasts (Old English: <i>wild-deor</i>—a place of wild deer) in the Book of Exodus. Attempts to redefine the words are similarly cultural and reflect attempts to preserve the use of the words in the face of an increasing awareness by western ecologists of the deep interconnectedness between Indigenous peoples and the health of their lands.</p><p>Conservation is a multifaceted concept that generally refers to the protection, preservation, management, and care of our environment. Conservation has its roots in the writings and ideas of Thoreau and Muir, two deeply religious figures who deified nature and frequently invoked the “<i>wild</i>” to describe the majesty they saw in nature. The true definition of “<i>wild</i>” is to be in a state of nature, not tame, not domesticated: land that is uncultivated and uninhabited by humans (Oxford English Dictionary <span>2024</span>). As the name suggests, rewilding seeks to make a place “<i>wild</i>” again. It is a branch of conservation that has focused almost universally on strategies that reduce human intervention in nature over time. It is the discrete attempt to dehumanize our environment—to remove human influence from it and “return” it to its natural state.</p><p>Names are important, because they frame how something is perceived and understood. The words used in naming can, thus, reinforce existing power structures, perpetuate stereotypes, and exclude or marginalize certain groups. “Pro-choice” or “pro-life,” “climate change” or “global warming,” “illegal aliens” or “undocumented immigrants,” “rewilding” or “biocultural restoration”: Each of these names preloads us with ideas that influence how we think and feel (Gann and Matlock <span>2014</span>). They influence the choices we make, actions we take, and the rationale we use to justify those decisions.</p><p>Humans have influenced around 80% of the Earth's ","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13107","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144197320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James Reed, Jos Barlow, Rachel Carmenta, Sima Fakheran, Amy Ickowitz, Terry Sunderland
The Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) marked a renewed commitment to addressing the global biodiversity crisis. This framework of four goals and 23 interim targets is intended to guide and accelerate conservation efforts over the next 25 years and is more ambitious than its predecessor, the Aichi 2020 targets. However, the pursuit of multilateral agreements is dependent upon national pledges, and the limited success of the Aichi targets shows that national pledges are of little worth without aligned (sub)national action. We assessed the submitted National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans of several member countries to determine their alignment with the bold ambition of the GBF. We find a lack of alignment between the GBF and country submissions across many targets, with the notable exception of Target 3—commonly interpreted as increasing protected area coverage to 30% by 2030. Reflecting on the submissions, recent developments, and our collective experience, we outline key considerations that could help guide future submissions and implementation strategies. We caution against cherry-picking specific targets, highlighting that an overemphasis on Target 3 will fail to achieve the overarching vision of living in harmony with nature. This requires a more holistic and inclusive approach to conservation and a focus on the full suite of GBF targets.
{"title":"Avoid Cherry-Picking Targets and Embrace Holistic Conservation to Pursue the Global Biodiversity Framework","authors":"James Reed, Jos Barlow, Rachel Carmenta, Sima Fakheran, Amy Ickowitz, Terry Sunderland","doi":"10.1111/conl.13104","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13104","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) marked a renewed commitment to addressing the global biodiversity crisis. This framework of four goals and 23 interim targets is intended to guide and accelerate conservation efforts over the next 25 years and is more ambitious than its predecessor, the Aichi 2020 targets. However, the pursuit of multilateral agreements is dependent upon national pledges, and the limited success of the Aichi targets shows that national pledges are of little worth without aligned (sub)national action. We assessed the submitted National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans of several member countries to determine their alignment with the bold ambition of the GBF. We find a lack of alignment between the GBF and country submissions across many targets, with the notable exception of Target 3—commonly interpreted as increasing protected area coverage to 30% by 2030. Reflecting on the submissions, recent developments, and our collective experience, we outline key considerations that could help guide future submissions and implementation strategies. We caution against cherry-picking specific targets, highlighting that an overemphasis on Target 3 will fail to achieve the overarching vision of living in harmony with nature. This requires a more holistic and inclusive approach to conservation and a focus on the full suite of GBF targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13104","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144191003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Geraldine Werhahn, Claudio Augugliaro, Muhammad Kabir, Lauren M. Hennelly, Madhu Chetri, Hadi Al Hikmani, Alireza Mohammadi, Yadvendradev V. Jhala, David W. Macdonald, Mohammad S. Farhadinia
In Asia, carnivore conservation is often focused on charismatic big cats. Opportunities to conserve the entire carnivore guild are frequently overlooked by channeling conservation and mitigation efforts into single-species conservation. We synthesize experiences across Asia to explore these challenges and propose mitigations to maximize conservation benefits for the entire carnivore guild. Seven challenges for wolves (Canis lupus) in Asia are highlighted: wolves (1) have been neglected over decades of single-species conservation, (2) receive less cultural appreciation in many regions, (3) are subject to lax legislation and law enforcement, (4) are often blamed disproportionately for livestock depredation, (5) are often considered more abundant than they are, (6), receive disproportionately little attention from the scientific and conservation communities relative to their ecological importance, and (7) are threatened ecologically and genetically by increasing feral dog populations. As a result, the status of wolves across Asia is poorly documented, there is an enhanced risk of losing significant evolutionary lineages, and it detracts from research and conservation opportunities to preserve the entire carnivore guild. We propose various remedies, such as widening the scope of existing conservation programs, building awareness and knowledge of communities and law enforcement agencies, and more research to inform conservation and legislation.
{"title":"Asia's Wolves and Synergies With Big Cats","authors":"Geraldine Werhahn, Claudio Augugliaro, Muhammad Kabir, Lauren M. Hennelly, Madhu Chetri, Hadi Al Hikmani, Alireza Mohammadi, Yadvendradev V. Jhala, David W. Macdonald, Mohammad S. Farhadinia","doi":"10.1111/conl.13094","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13094","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Asia, carnivore conservation is often focused on charismatic big cats. Opportunities to conserve the entire carnivore guild are frequently overlooked by channeling conservation and mitigation efforts into single-species conservation. We synthesize experiences across Asia to explore these challenges and propose mitigations to maximize conservation benefits for the entire carnivore guild. Seven challenges for wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>) in Asia are highlighted: wolves (1) have been neglected over decades of single-species conservation, (2) receive less cultural appreciation in many regions, (3) are subject to lax legislation and law enforcement, (4) are often blamed disproportionately for livestock depredation, (5) are often considered more abundant than they are, (6), receive disproportionately little attention from the scientific and conservation communities relative to their ecological importance, and (7) are threatened ecologically and genetically by increasing feral dog populations. As a result, the status of wolves across Asia is poorly documented, there is an enhanced risk of losing significant evolutionary lineages, and it detracts from research and conservation opportunities to preserve the entire carnivore guild. We propose various remedies, such as widening the scope of existing conservation programs, building awareness and knowledge of communities and law enforcement agencies, and more research to inform conservation and legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13094","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143871601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K. L. Indeck, M. F. Baumgartner, L. Lecavalier, F. Whoriskey, K. T. A. Davies
Dynamic management is intended to mitigate the impacts of human activities on wildlife when and where the activities overlap with at-risk species. Amid an ever-growing maritime industry, we researched the performance of mobile underwater passive acoustic gliders as near real-time monitoring assets for the purpose of whale-vessel strike mitigation through dynamic management. Across 580 glider survey days, 30 near real-time acoustic detections of critically endangered North Atlantic right whales (NARWs) triggered 194 days of mandatory 10-knot vessel speed limits in three Canadian Dynamic Shipping Zones (DSZs). We found a high degree of interannual and seasonal variation in NARW acoustic occurrence and vessel slowdowns in the DSZs. Gliders were more effective than aerial surveillance at triggering slowdowns by a factor of 2–5 during fall and summer but were less effective during spring. Our results provide unambiguous evidence that gliders are effective monitoring platforms that can enhance dynamic ocean management goals globally.
{"title":"Passive Acoustic Gliders Are Effective Monitoring Tools for Dynamic Management Plans Aimed at Mitigating Whale-Vessel Strikes","authors":"K. L. Indeck, M. F. Baumgartner, L. Lecavalier, F. Whoriskey, K. T. A. Davies","doi":"10.1111/conl.13102","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13102","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dynamic management is intended to mitigate the impacts of human activities on wildlife when and where the activities overlap with at-risk species. Amid an ever-growing maritime industry, we researched the performance of mobile underwater passive acoustic gliders as near real-time monitoring assets for the purpose of whale-vessel strike mitigation through dynamic management. Across 580 glider survey days, 30 near real-time acoustic detections of critically endangered North Atlantic right whales (NARWs) triggered 194 days of mandatory 10-knot vessel speed limits in three Canadian Dynamic Shipping Zones (DSZs). We found a high degree of interannual and seasonal variation in NARW acoustic occurrence and vessel slowdowns in the DSZs. Gliders were more effective than aerial surveillance at triggering slowdowns by a factor of 2–5 during fall and summer but were less effective during spring. Our results provide unambiguous evidence that gliders are effective monitoring platforms that can enhance dynamic ocean management goals globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13102","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143857087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hubert Cheung, Daniel W. S. Challender, Michelle Anagnostou, Alexander R. Braczkowski, Moreno Di Marco, Amy Hinsley, Takahiro Kubo, Hugh P. Possingham, Annie Young Song, Nao Takashina, Yifu Wang, Duan Biggs
Unsustainable wildlife trade is a major driver of global biodiversity loss. Effective wildlife trade governance is critical for conservation and requires international cooperation and coordination to regulate an industry valued at hundreds of billions of dollars a year. Yet, due to increasing polarization over consumptive wildlife use, certain countries have become disenfranchised by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), the primary mechanism for regulating international wildlife trade. Tensions within CITES are rising over the elephant ivory and rhino horn trade, where polarization has pushed ten Southern African Development Community countries to suggest an outright withdrawal from CITES. The denunciation of CITES by such a large and ecologically significant bloc would substantially weaken the integrity, credibility, and stature of the Convention. There is a contemporary precedent to reference: Japan left the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in 2019 due to polarization over commercial whaling. Here, we examine the common threads between these two cases: changing organizational ethos, polarization amongst members, influence of non-state actors, and loss of decidability for dissenting nations. Taking critical lessons from Japan's IWC withdrawal, we propose various options for structural reforms in CITES to restore decidability, enable equitability, and implement inclusive decision-making.
{"title":"Protect the Integrity of CITES: Lessons From Japan's IWC Withdrawal to Keep Polarization From Tearing CITES Apart","authors":"Hubert Cheung, Daniel W. S. Challender, Michelle Anagnostou, Alexander R. Braczkowski, Moreno Di Marco, Amy Hinsley, Takahiro Kubo, Hugh P. Possingham, Annie Young Song, Nao Takashina, Yifu Wang, Duan Biggs","doi":"10.1111/conl.13099","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13099","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Unsustainable wildlife trade is a major driver of global biodiversity loss. Effective wildlife trade governance is critical for conservation and requires international cooperation and coordination to regulate an industry valued at hundreds of billions of dollars a year. Yet, due to increasing polarization over consumptive wildlife use, certain countries have become disenfranchised by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), the primary mechanism for regulating international wildlife trade. Tensions within CITES are rising over the elephant ivory and rhino horn trade, where polarization has pushed ten Southern African Development Community countries to suggest an outright withdrawal from CITES. The denunciation of CITES by such a large and ecologically significant bloc would substantially weaken the integrity, credibility, and stature of the Convention. There is a contemporary precedent to reference: Japan left the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in 2019 due to polarization over commercial whaling. Here, we examine the common threads between these two cases: changing organizational ethos, polarization amongst members, influence of non-state actors, and loss of decidability for dissenting nations. Taking critical lessons from Japan's IWC withdrawal, we propose various options for structural reforms in CITES to restore decidability, enable equitability, and implement inclusive decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143857086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lufeng Zhao, Qiyue Luo, Taojie Zhang, Ranxin Dai, Junlong Ye, Yingying Ye, Jianjun Tang, Jiaen Zhang, Liangliang Hu, Xin Chen
The conservation of crop genetic diversity by farmers has been well studied, but little has been documented for farmed fish. Here, we show how indigenous farmers conserve the genetic diversity of a farmed fish species—the common carp (Cyprinus carpio), locally known as paddy field carp (PF-carp)—within the paddy ecosystem. The PF-carp have been cocultured with rice in paddy fields (i.e., rice-fish coculture) by multiethnic farmers for thousands of years in southwestern China. Although converging to a similar morphological shape as an adaptation to the paddy ecosystem, PF-carp have diverged into diverse phenotypes, displaying high genetic diversity and a distinct genetic structure pattern. Farmers from different ethnic groups showed distinct preferences for fish, resulting in phenotypic diversity and genetic variation. A large number of multiethnic farmers participated in fish propagation, thereby maintaining a high level of genetic diversity in PF-carp. Our results highlight the critical role of indigenous farmers in preserving local genetic diversity and mitigating genetic degradation.
{"title":"The Conservation of Common Carp Genetic Diversity in an Agroecosystem by Indigenous Farmers","authors":"Lufeng Zhao, Qiyue Luo, Taojie Zhang, Ranxin Dai, Junlong Ye, Yingying Ye, Jianjun Tang, Jiaen Zhang, Liangliang Hu, Xin Chen","doi":"10.1111/conl.13103","DOIUrl":"10.1111/conl.13103","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The conservation of crop genetic diversity by farmers has been well studied, but little has been documented for farmed fish. Here, we show how indigenous farmers conserve the genetic diversity of a farmed fish species—the common carp (<i>Cyprinus carpio</i>), locally known as paddy field carp (PF-carp)—within the paddy ecosystem. The PF-carp have been cocultured with rice in paddy fields (i.e., rice-fish coculture) by multiethnic farmers for thousands of years in southwestern China. Although converging to a similar morphological shape as an adaptation to the paddy ecosystem, PF-carp have diverged into diverse phenotypes, displaying high genetic diversity and a distinct genetic structure pattern. Farmers from different ethnic groups showed distinct preferences for fish, resulting in phenotypic diversity and genetic variation. A large number of multiethnic farmers participated in fish propagation, thereby maintaining a high level of genetic diversity in PF-carp. Our results highlight the critical role of indigenous farmers in preserving local genetic diversity and mitigating genetic degradation.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13103","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143857088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}