首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
The Persian Version of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire's Short Form (FOPQ-SF): Psychometric Features Among Cancer Patients. 波斯语版癌症进展恐惧问卷简表(FOPQ-SF):癌症患者的心理测量特征
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01115-6
Fatemeh Hassani Alimolk, Pandora Patterson, Fiona Elizabeth Jean McDonald, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Farzane Ahmadi, Zhaleh Karimimoghaddam, Saeedeh Zenoozian

Introduction: Fear of progression (FOP) is a significant psychological concern among cancer patients. The Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FOPQ-SF) is one of the significant and reliable tools to evaluate FOP. This study aims to validate the psychometric features of the Persian version of FOPQ-SF in Iranian cancer patients.

Methods: The translation of the FOPQ-SF was developed using a "forward-backward" approach. This cross-sectional study included 120 cancer patients who completed the questionnaires. The validity and reliability of the FOPQ-SF were evaluated, and the factor structure was examined using both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results: The FOPQ-SF demonstrated high test-retest and internal reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.84. EFA revealed a one-factor structure consisting of 12 items. The FOPQ-SF exhibited high convergent validity, as indicated by significant correlations with anxiety, depression, the total score of HADS, and symptoms. It also demonstrated moderate divergent validity, with negative correlations observed between function and global health. Furthermore, FOP significantly differed among pre-defined groups based on cancer stages.

Discussion: The results indicate that the Persian version of the FOPQ-SF is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing FOP in 20-60 Iranian cancer patients ages.

简介癌症进展恐惧(FOP)是癌症患者的一个重要心理问题。恐惧进展问卷简表(FOPQ-SF)是评估恐惧进展的重要而可靠的工具之一。本研究旨在验证波斯语版 FOPQ-SF 在伊朗癌症患者中的心理测量特征:方法:FOPQ-SF 的翻译采用了 "前向-后向 "的方法。这项横断面研究包括 120 名完成问卷的癌症患者。对 FOPQ-SF 的有效性和可靠性进行了评估,并使用探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)对因子结构进行了研究:结果:FOPQ-SF 的测试-重复和内部信度都很高,Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.84。EFA 揭示了由 12 个项目组成的单因素结构。FOPQ-SF 与焦虑、抑郁、HADS 总分和症状之间存在显著的相关性,表明 FOPQ-SF 具有较高的聚合效度。它还表现出中等程度的发散效度,在功能和总体健康之间观察到负相关。此外,FOP 在基于癌症分期的预定义组别中存在明显差异:讨论:研究结果表明,波斯语版 FOPQ-SF 是评估 20-60 岁伊朗癌症患者 FOP 的可靠而有效的问卷。
{"title":"The Persian Version of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire's Short Form (FOPQ-SF): Psychometric Features Among Cancer Patients.","authors":"Fatemeh Hassani Alimolk, Pandora Patterson, Fiona Elizabeth Jean McDonald, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Farzane Ahmadi, Zhaleh Karimimoghaddam, Saeedeh Zenoozian","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01115-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01115-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fear of progression (FOP) is a significant psychological concern among cancer patients. The Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FOPQ-SF) is one of the significant and reliable tools to evaluate FOP. This study aims to validate the psychometric features of the Persian version of FOPQ-SF in Iranian cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The translation of the FOPQ-SF was developed using a \"forward-backward\" approach. This cross-sectional study included 120 cancer patients who completed the questionnaires. The validity and reliability of the FOPQ-SF were evaluated, and the factor structure was examined using both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FOPQ-SF demonstrated high test-retest and internal reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.84. EFA revealed a one-factor structure consisting of 12 items. The FOPQ-SF exhibited high convergent validity, as indicated by significant correlations with anxiety, depression, the total score of HADS, and symptoms. It also demonstrated moderate divergent validity, with negative correlations observed between function and global health. Furthermore, FOP significantly differed among pre-defined groups based on cancer stages.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results indicate that the Persian version of the FOPQ-SF is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing FOP in 20-60 Iranian cancer patients ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142501937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Comparisons Involving Ramucirumab. 针对曾接受过治疗的晚期胃癌或胃食管交界癌患者的随机对照试验网络 Meta 分析:涉及雷莫芦单抗的比较。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01121-8
Yulia D'yachkova, Astra M Liepa, Rajat Goel, Veronika Earley-Valovic, Abby Paine, Palvi Gupta, Kaisa Taipale

Purpose: With relatively few direct comparisons among treatment options for previously treated advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, network meta-analysis (NMA) may inform evidence-based decision-making. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (RAM + PTX) is a preferred regimen in guideline recommendations. NMA of key outcomes may further characterize the relative clinical value of RAM + PTX.

Methods: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials of adult patients with previously treated advanced gastric/GEJ cancer informed a NMA which compared overall survival, progression-free survival, and discontinuations due to adverse events. Comparisons were reported relative to placebo/best supportive care (BSC) when possible, otherwise relative to RAM + PTX.

Results: The base-case NMA focused on second-line treatment only, from 19 of 28 studies identified. For overall survival, seven of 16 regimens were favorable relative to placebo/BSC, with RAM + PTX as the most favorable. For progression-free survival, five of 14 regimens were unfavorable relative to RAM + PTX. For discontinuations due to adverse events, two of 13 regimens were similar to placebo/BSC: ramucirumab monotherapy and fluorouracil; relative to RAM-PTX, all regimens were similar except ramucirumab monotherapy which was favorable and irinotecan + cisplatin which was unfavorable.

Conclusion: This NMA of trials of previously treated gastric/GEJ cancer suggests that RAM + PTX has one of the more favorable clinical profiles.

目的:对于既往接受过治疗的晚期胃癌或胃食管交界处癌(GEJ),各种治疗方案之间的直接比较相对较少,网络荟萃分析(NMA)可为循证决策提供依据。拉莫单抗加紫杉醇(RAM + PTX)是指南推荐的首选方案。对关键结果进行 NMA 分析可进一步确定 RAM + PTX 的相对临床价值:对曾接受过治疗的晚期胃癌/GEJ 癌成年患者的随机对照试验进行了系统性文献综述,并对总生存期、无进展生存期和因不良反应而停药的情况进行了 NMA 比较。在可能的情况下,与安慰剂/最佳支持治疗(BSC)进行比较,否则与 RAM + PTX 进行比较:基础案例 NMA 仅关注二线治疗,来自 28 项已确定研究中的 19 项。在总生存期方面,16 个方案中有 7 个方案优于安慰剂/BSC,其中 RAM + PTX 方案的生存期最长。在无进展生存期方面,14 个方案中有 5 个方案相对于 RAM + PTX 是不利的。在不良反应导致的停药方面,13种方案中有两种与安慰剂/BSC相似:拉穆单抗单药疗法和氟尿嘧啶;相对于RAM-PTX,除了拉穆单抗单药疗法有利和伊立替康+顺铂不利外,其他方案均相似:对既往接受过治疗的胃癌/胃癌患者进行的 NMA 试验表明,RAM + PTX 是临床疗效较好的方案之一。
{"title":"Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Comparisons Involving Ramucirumab.","authors":"Yulia D'yachkova, Astra M Liepa, Rajat Goel, Veronika Earley-Valovic, Abby Paine, Palvi Gupta, Kaisa Taipale","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01121-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-024-01121-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With relatively few direct comparisons among treatment options for previously treated advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, network meta-analysis (NMA) may inform evidence-based decision-making. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (RAM + PTX) is a preferred regimen in guideline recommendations. NMA of key outcomes may further characterize the relative clinical value of RAM + PTX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials of adult patients with previously treated advanced gastric/GEJ cancer informed a NMA which compared overall survival, progression-free survival, and discontinuations due to adverse events. Comparisons were reported relative to placebo/best supportive care (BSC) when possible, otherwise relative to RAM + PTX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base-case NMA focused on second-line treatment only, from 19 of 28 studies identified. For overall survival, seven of 16 regimens were favorable relative to placebo/BSC, with RAM + PTX as the most favorable. For progression-free survival, five of 14 regimens were unfavorable relative to RAM + PTX. For discontinuations due to adverse events, two of 13 regimens were similar to placebo/BSC: ramucirumab monotherapy and fluorouracil; relative to RAM-PTX, all regimens were similar except ramucirumab monotherapy which was favorable and irinotecan + cisplatin which was unfavorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This NMA of trials of previously treated gastric/GEJ cancer suggests that RAM + PTX has one of the more favorable clinical profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142501936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Anti-EGFR Therapy Rechallenge in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 转移性结直肠癌抗EGFR疗法再挑战的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01128-1
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Anna Luíza Soares de Oliveira Rodrigues, Jonathan N Priantti, Jhonny Limachi-Choque, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with a significant portion of patients presenting with metastatic disease at diagnosis. Resistance to initial anti-EGFR therapy, a key treatment for RAS wild-type metastatic CRC, remains a major challenge. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in patients with metastatic CRC who have progressed after prior treatments.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies involving patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic CRC who received anti-EGFR therapy as a rechallenge. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using the DerSimonian/Laird random effect model, with heterogeneity assessed via I2 statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses.

Results: Fourteen studies were included with 520 patients; 50.3% were male, and the median age was 63 years old. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) ranged between 2.4 and 4.9 months, while the median overall survival (mOS) ranged from 5 to 17.8 months. Our pooled analysis demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 17.70% (95% CI, 8.58-26.82%) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 61.72% (95% CI, 53.32-70.11%), both with significant heterogeneity (I2, 84% and 80%, respectively; p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, cetuximab showed an ORR of 18.31% (95% CI, 4.67-31.94%), and panitumumab an ORR of 10.9% (95% CI, 0.00-26.82%), while the combination of both resulted in an ORR of 29.24% (95% CI, 0.00-65.84%). For DCR, cetuximab resulted in 62.1% (95% CI, 49.32-74.87%), panitumumab in 63.05% (95% CI, 52.13-73.97%), and the combination in 60.34% (95% CI, 31.92-88.77%), all with significant heterogeneity. Adverse events included anemia (15.39%), diarrhea (4.20%), hypomagnesemia (6.40%), neutropenia (22.57%), and skin rash (13.22%).

Conclusions: Rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic CRC patients shows moderate efficacy with manageable safety profiles. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and monitoring to optimize outcomes. Further studies are warranted to refine strategies for maximizing the therapeutic benefits of anti-EGFR rechallenge.

背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是导致全球癌症相关死亡的第二大原因,其中相当一部分患者在确诊时已出现转移性疾病。抗EGFR疗法是治疗RAS野生型转移性CRC的关键疗法,但患者对该疗法的耐药性仍是一大挑战。本研究旨在评估在既往治疗后病情进展的转移性 CRC 患者再次接受抗 EGFR 治疗的疗效和安全性:在 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 和 Scopus 上进行了系统检索。纳入的研究为随机对照试验(RCT)或观察性研究,涉及接受抗 EGFR 治疗作为再挑战的 EGFR 突变转移性 CRC 患者。终点包括客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和不良事件发生率。统计分析采用 DerSimonian/Laird 随机效应模型,异质性通过 I2 统计量进行评估。统计分析使用 4.2.3 版 R:共纳入14项研究,520名患者;50.3%为男性,中位年龄为63岁。中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为 2.4 至 4.9 个月,中位总生存期(mOS)为 5 至 17.8 个月。我们的汇总分析表明,客观反应率(ORR)为 17.70%(95% CI,8.58-26.82%),疾病控制率(DCR)为 61.72%(95% CI,53.32-70.11%),两者均具有显著的异质性(I2 分别为 84% 和 80%;P 结论:对转移性 CRC 患者进行抗 EGFR 治疗的再挑战显示出中等疗效和可控的安全性。这些发现强调了谨慎选择和监测患者以优化疗效的必要性。有必要开展进一步研究,以完善策略,最大限度地提高抗 EGFR 再挑战的治疗效果。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Anti-EGFR Therapy Rechallenge in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Anna Luíza Soares de Oliveira Rodrigues, Jonathan N Priantti, Jhonny Limachi-Choque, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01128-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-024-01128-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with a significant portion of patients presenting with metastatic disease at diagnosis. Resistance to initial anti-EGFR therapy, a key treatment for RAS wild-type metastatic CRC, remains a major challenge. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in patients with metastatic CRC who have progressed after prior treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies involving patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic CRC who received anti-EGFR therapy as a rechallenge. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using the DerSimonian/Laird random effect model, with heterogeneity assessed via I<sup>2</sup> statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included with 520 patients; 50.3% were male, and the median age was 63 years old. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) ranged between 2.4 and 4.9 months, while the median overall survival (mOS) ranged from 5 to 17.8 months. Our pooled analysis demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 17.70% (95% CI, 8.58-26.82%) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 61.72% (95% CI, 53.32-70.11%), both with significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>, 84% and 80%, respectively; p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, cetuximab showed an ORR of 18.31% (95% CI, 4.67-31.94%), and panitumumab an ORR of 10.9% (95% CI, 0.00-26.82%), while the combination of both resulted in an ORR of 29.24% (95% CI, 0.00-65.84%). For DCR, cetuximab resulted in 62.1% (95% CI, 49.32-74.87%), panitumumab in 63.05% (95% CI, 52.13-73.97%), and the combination in 60.34% (95% CI, 31.92-88.77%), all with significant heterogeneity. Adverse events included anemia (15.39%), diarrhea (4.20%), hypomagnesemia (6.40%), neutropenia (22.57%), and skin rash (13.22%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic CRC patients shows moderate efficacy with manageable safety profiles. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and monitoring to optimize outcomes. Further studies are warranted to refine strategies for maximizing the therapeutic benefits of anti-EGFR rechallenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overall Survival of Young Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B in a Retrospective Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort. 基于多中心队列的回顾性研究:巴塞罗那诊所肝癌 B 期年轻肝细胞癌患者的总生存率
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01126-3
Koji Fujita, Kyoko Oura, Asahiro Morishita, Takashi Himoto, Hideki Kobara

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually diagnosed in patients at the age of > 45 years. We aimed to determine the prognosis of patients with HCC at the age of 30-44 years compared with that of patients at a more senior age.

Methods: Based on the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center database, a total of 1745 patients with HCC were retrospectively enrolled and were assigned to three age groups (30-44, 45-59, and 60-70 years). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Among baseline characteristics, five variables including sex, serum albumin level, total bilirubin level, the maximum tumor diameter, and the number of tumor nodules were adjusted using propensity score matching.

Results: Patients aged 30-44 years presented a worse overall survival, a greater number of HCC nodules, a greater maximum tumor diameter, and higher serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration than those aged 45-59 years in a crude analysis (p < 0.05). Using propensity score matching, the difference in overall survival between the two cohorts was canceled (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The prognosis of patients with HCC at age 30-44 years was equal to that of patients aged 45-59 years.

背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)的确诊年龄通常大于 45 岁。我们旨在确定 30-44 岁 HCC 患者与高龄患者的预后比较:方法:基于中山大学肿瘤中心的数据库,我们回顾性地纳入了1745名HCC患者,并将其分为三个年龄组(30-44岁、45-59岁和60-70岁)。主要终点是总生存期。在基线特征中,包括性别、血清白蛋白水平、总胆红素水平、肿瘤最大直径和肿瘤结节数量在内的五个变量采用倾向评分匹配法进行了调整:结果:与 45-59 岁的患者相比,30-44 岁患者的总生存率较低、HCC 结节数量较多、肿瘤最大直径较大、血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)浓度较高(P 0.05):结论:30-44 岁的 HCC 患者的预后与 45-59 岁的患者相同。
{"title":"Overall Survival of Young Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B in a Retrospective Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort.","authors":"Koji Fujita, Kyoko Oura, Asahiro Morishita, Takashi Himoto, Hideki Kobara","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01126-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01126-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually diagnosed in patients at the age of > 45 years. We aimed to determine the prognosis of patients with HCC at the age of 30-44 years compared with that of patients at a more senior age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center database, a total of 1745 patients with HCC were retrospectively enrolled and were assigned to three age groups (30-44, 45-59, and 60-70 years). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Among baseline characteristics, five variables including sex, serum albumin level, total bilirubin level, the maximum tumor diameter, and the number of tumor nodules were adjusted using propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients aged 30-44 years presented a worse overall survival, a greater number of HCC nodules, a greater maximum tumor diameter, and higher serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration than those aged 45-59 years in a crude analysis (p < 0.05). Using propensity score matching, the difference in overall survival between the two cohorts was canceled (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognosis of patients with HCC at age 30-44 years was equal to that of patients aged 45-59 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy (RPLN) on the Outcomes of Locally Advanced Gall Bladder Cancer (GBC) Following Chemotherapy (CT) or Chemotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemoradiotherapy (CTRT). 腹膜后淋巴结病 (RPLN) 对化疗 (CT) 或化疗后巩固放化疗 (CTRT) 的局部晚期胆囊癌 (GBC) 治疗效果的影响。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01124-5
Sushma Agrawal, Nagendra Naik, Parul Priyanka

Introduction: Retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy is considered a metastatic disease in GBC; however, some surgical series of radical surgery with enlarged RPLN who underwent RPLN dissection have shown results marginally inferior to those without enlarged RPLN. Radiological RPLN comprises a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC. There is dilemma in the intent of treatment to be offered in such cases. We are reporting our series of outcome of GBC with RPLN treated with first-line CT followed by consolidation CTRT.

Materials and methods: Non-metastatic locally advanced GBC with good performance status (KPS ≥ 80) were initiated on first-line CT (cisplatin-gemcitabine), and thereafter, responders were evaluated by CECT-angiography and PET-CT scan for resectability. If found unresectable, they were offered consolidation CTRT to a dose of 45 Gy by conventional fractionation (3D-CRT technique) along with concurrent capecitabine at 1250 mg/m2 to GBC and regional lymphatics including RPLN. Thereafter, boost dose of 9 Gy/5# was given to GBC only. Response assessment was done using CECT abdomen by RECIST criteria v 1.1. Outcomes (overall survival) of the two groups (RPLN vs non-RPLN) were computed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and chi-square tests using SPSS v 20.

Results: Among 189 patients of advanced non-metastatic GBC recruited from 2011 to 2022, 80 had RPLN. The demographic features of both groups were comparable. Overall, 68% of the patients were women, 30% underwent upfront stenting for obstructive jaundice, and 90% had T3 and T4 disease. Only 10% had undergone upfront laparoscopic staging and had pathologically proven RPLN. Forty percent of the patients received four cycles of CT only and 50% of the patients received six cycles or more and 33% received CTRT. By RECIST criteria, 10% vs 16% achieved complete response (CR), 39% vs 41% achieved partial response (PR), 16% vs 15% achieved stable disease (SD), 2.7% vs 6% had disease progression (PD), and 14.5% vs 3.7% were non-evaluable in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. 12% vs 6% could undergo radical surgery in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group (p = 0.03). The median OS was 9 months (95% CI 7.6-10.3 months) vs 10 months (95% CI 8-9.8 months) (p = NS) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. In those who received CT only, the median OS was 7 months vs 8 months, while in those who received CT followed by CTRT, the median OS was 14 months vs 13 months (p = 0.65) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively.

Conclusions: Based on this analysis, we conclude that RPLN constitutes a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC and has outcomes similar to those without RPLN if treated with radical intent. RPLN should not be considered a metastatic disease and should be treated with radical intent.

导言:腹膜后淋巴结病被认为是 GBC 的一种转移性疾病;然而,一些根治性手术系列中,RPLN 淋巴结肿大并接受 RPLN 淋巴结清扫术的患者的治疗效果略逊于 RPLN 淋巴结未肿大的患者。放射性 RPLN 在晚期非转移性 GBC 中占很大比例。对这类病例的治疗意向存在两难。我们报告了我们对伴有RPLN的GBC进行一线CT治疗后再进行CTRT巩固治疗的结果:非转移性局部晚期 GBC 且表现状态良好(KPS ≥ 80)者开始接受一线 CT(顺铂-吉西他滨)治疗,之后通过 CECT 血管造影和 PET-CT 扫描评估有反应者的可切除性。如果发现无法切除,则采用常规分型(3D-CRT 技术)进行 45 Gy 剂量的 CTRT 巩固治疗,同时对 GBC 和区域淋巴(包括 RPLN)使用 1250 mg/m2 的卡培他滨。此后,仅对GBC给予9 Gy/5#的增强剂量。根据RECIST标准1.1版,采用腹部CECT进行反应评估。两组(RPLN 与非 RPLN)的结果(总生存期)通过 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线计算,并使用 SPSS v 20 进行卡方检验:在2011年至2022年招募的189名晚期非转移性GBC患者中,有80人患有RPLN。两组患者的人口统计学特征相当。总体而言,68%的患者为女性,30%的患者因阻塞性黄疸接受了前期支架植入术,90%的患者患有T3和T4疾病。只有10%的患者接受过腹腔镜前期分期,并经病理证实患有RPLN。40%的患者只接受了4个周期的CT治疗,50%的患者接受了6个周期或更多周期的治疗,33%的患者接受了CTRT治疗。根据RECIST标准,非RPLN组和RPLN组分别有10%和16%的患者获得完全反应(CR),39%和41%的患者获得部分反应(PR),16%和15%的患者获得疾病稳定(SD),2.7%和6%的患者疾病进展(PD),14.5%和3.7%的患者无评估结果。非RPLN组与RPLN组相比,12%对6%可以接受根治性手术(P = 0.03)。非RPLN组与RPLN组的中位OS分别为9个月(95% CI 7.6-10.3个月)与10个月(95% CI 8-9.8个月)(p = NS)。仅接受CT治疗的患者的中位OS为7个月 vs 8个月,而接受CT治疗后再接受CTRT治疗的患者的中位OS为14个月 vs 13个月,非RPLN组 vs RPLN组分别为14个月 vs 13个月(p = 0.65):根据这一分析,我们得出结论:RPLN 在晚期非转移性 GBC 中占很大比例,如果采用根治性治疗,其结果与无 RPLN 者相似。RPLN不应被视为转移性疾病,应采用根治性治疗。
{"title":"Impact of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy (RPLN) on the Outcomes of Locally Advanced Gall Bladder Cancer (GBC) Following Chemotherapy (CT) or Chemotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemoradiotherapy (CTRT).","authors":"Sushma Agrawal, Nagendra Naik, Parul Priyanka","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01124-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01124-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy is considered a metastatic disease in GBC; however, some surgical series of radical surgery with enlarged RPLN who underwent RPLN dissection have shown results marginally inferior to those without enlarged RPLN. Radiological RPLN comprises a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC. There is dilemma in the intent of treatment to be offered in such cases. We are reporting our series of outcome of GBC with RPLN treated with first-line CT followed by consolidation CTRT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Non-metastatic locally advanced GBC with good performance status (KPS ≥ 80) were initiated on first-line CT (cisplatin-gemcitabine), and thereafter, responders were evaluated by CECT-angiography and PET-CT scan for resectability. If found unresectable, they were offered consolidation CTRT to a dose of 45 Gy by conventional fractionation (3D-CRT technique) along with concurrent capecitabine at 1250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> to GBC and regional lymphatics including RPLN. Thereafter, boost dose of 9 Gy/5# was given to GBC only. Response assessment was done using CECT abdomen by RECIST criteria v 1.1. Outcomes (overall survival) of the two groups (RPLN vs non-RPLN) were computed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and chi-square tests using SPSS v 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 189 patients of advanced non-metastatic GBC recruited from 2011 to 2022, 80 had RPLN. The demographic features of both groups were comparable. Overall, 68% of the patients were women, 30% underwent upfront stenting for obstructive jaundice, and 90% had T3 and T4 disease. Only 10% had undergone upfront laparoscopic staging and had pathologically proven RPLN. Forty percent of the patients received four cycles of CT only and 50% of the patients received six cycles or more and 33% received CTRT. By RECIST criteria, 10% vs 16% achieved complete response (CR), 39% vs 41% achieved partial response (PR), 16% vs 15% achieved stable disease (SD), 2.7% vs 6% had disease progression (PD), and 14.5% vs 3.7% were non-evaluable in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. 12% vs 6% could undergo radical surgery in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group (p = 0.03). The median OS was 9 months (95% CI 7.6-10.3 months) vs 10 months (95% CI 8-9.8 months) (p = NS) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. In those who received CT only, the median OS was 7 months vs 8 months, while in those who received CT followed by CTRT, the median OS was 14 months vs 13 months (p = 0.65) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this analysis, we conclude that RPLN constitutes a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC and has outcomes similar to those without RPLN if treated with radical intent. RPLN should not be considered a metastatic disease and should be treated with radical intent.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Increased Proportion of the Squamous Cell Carcinoma Components Is Associated with Aggressive Behavior and a Worse Prognosis in Resected Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma. 在切除的胰腺腺鳞癌中,鳞状细胞癌成分比例的增加与侵袭行为和较差的预后有关。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01123-6
Takaaki Tatsuguchi, Daichi Kitahara, Shingo Kozono, Kenjiro Date, Tomohiko Shinkawa, Hirotaka Kuga, Sadafumi Tamiya, Kazuyoshi Nishihara, Toru Nakano

Purpose: Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a subtype of pancreatic cancer with a poorer prognosis than pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC). The pathogenesis of this histological subtype has not been fully explained due to its rarity.

Methods: Of the 245 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer, six (2.3%) were diagnosed with PASC. They were retrospectively allocated to Group A (≥ 50% adenocarcinoma components) or Group S (≥ 50% squamous cell carcinoma components).

Results: The six patients with PASC were all males between the ages of 63 and 77 years, with tumors of 12 to 52 mm in diameter. Tumors were located in the pancreatic head (n = 2) and the pancreatic tail (n = 4). Relative to Group A, all three patients in Group S had larger tumors diameters, ≥ 40 mm with invasion to other organs. Cancer-specific survival of Group S was worse than that of the PDAC group (median survival, 1.5 years vs. 4.1 years). All patients in Group A were alive at the end of follow-up. Recurrence-free survival of Group S was inferior to that of the PDAC group (median survival, 0.2 years vs. 1.8 years; Group A, not defined). Immunohistochemistry revealed the MIB-1 positivity rate in squamous cell carcinoma regions was 1.8 times higher than that in adenocarcinoma regions in the same specimens.

Conclusion: In PASC patients, an increased proportion of squamous cell carcinoma components was associated with aggressive behavior and a worse prognosis. This was due to the high MIB-1 positivity rate of squamous cell carcinoma components.

目的:胰腺腺鳞癌(PASC)是胰腺癌的一种亚型,其预后比胰腺导管癌(PDAC)差。由于其罕见性,该组织学亚型的发病机制尚未得到充分解释:在 245 名接受胰腺切除术的胰腺癌患者中,有 6 人(2.3%)被诊断为 PASC。他们被回顾性地分配到A组(腺癌成分≥50%)或S组(鳞癌成分≥50%):六名PASC患者均为男性,年龄在63至77岁之间,肿瘤直径在12至52毫米之间。肿瘤位于胰头(2 例)和胰尾(4 例)。与A组相比,S组的三位患者肿瘤直径都较大,≥40毫米,并侵犯其他器官。S 组的癌症特异性生存期比 PDAC 组更差(中位生存期 1.5 年对 4.1 年)。A 组所有患者在随访结束时均存活。S 组的无复发生存期低于 PDAC 组(中位生存期 0.2 年对 1.8 年;A 组,未定义)。免疫组化显示,在相同的标本中,鳞状细胞癌区域的 MIB-1 阳性率是腺癌区域的 1.8 倍:结论:在PASC患者中,鳞状细胞癌成分比例的增加与侵袭性行为和较差的预后有关。这是因为鳞状细胞癌成分的MIB-1阳性率较高。
{"title":"Increased Proportion of the Squamous Cell Carcinoma Components Is Associated with Aggressive Behavior and a Worse Prognosis in Resected Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma.","authors":"Takaaki Tatsuguchi, Daichi Kitahara, Shingo Kozono, Kenjiro Date, Tomohiko Shinkawa, Hirotaka Kuga, Sadafumi Tamiya, Kazuyoshi Nishihara, Toru Nakano","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01123-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01123-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a subtype of pancreatic cancer with a poorer prognosis than pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC). The pathogenesis of this histological subtype has not been fully explained due to its rarity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 245 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer, six (2.3%) were diagnosed with PASC. They were retrospectively allocated to Group A (≥ 50% adenocarcinoma components) or Group S (≥ 50% squamous cell carcinoma components).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The six patients with PASC were all males between the ages of 63 and 77 years, with tumors of 12 to 52 mm in diameter. Tumors were located in the pancreatic head (n = 2) and the pancreatic tail (n = 4). Relative to Group A, all three patients in Group S had larger tumors diameters, ≥ 40 mm with invasion to other organs. Cancer-specific survival of Group S was worse than that of the PDAC group (median survival, 1.5 years vs. 4.1 years). All patients in Group A were alive at the end of follow-up. Recurrence-free survival of Group S was inferior to that of the PDAC group (median survival, 0.2 years vs. 1.8 years; Group A, not defined). Immunohistochemistry revealed the MIB-1 positivity rate in squamous cell carcinoma regions was 1.8 times higher than that in adenocarcinoma regions in the same specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In PASC patients, an increased proportion of squamous cell carcinoma components was associated with aggressive behavior and a worse prognosis. This was due to the high MIB-1 positivity rate of squamous cell carcinoma components.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perianal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and a Systematic Review of the Literature. 肛周黏液腺癌:病例报告与文献系统回顾
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01116-5
Ioannis D Gkegkes, Vassilis Milionis, Nikolaos Goutas, Ioannis Mantzoros, Antonia A Bourtzinakou, Apostolos P Stamatiadis

Background: Mucinous adenocarcinoma of anus is an uncommon neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. In most of the cases, early diagnosis of this disease is difficult since its symptoms frequently mimic benign inflammatory conditions.

Methods: A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted, a propos of a case report.

Results: One hundred fifty patients from 93 case reports were included. The mean age of the patients was 60.5 years (range: 18-81). The majority of them were males (124 out of 150, 82.7%), while the main known risk factor was the history of chronic fistula (109 out of 150, 72.7%). Recurrent perianal sepsis and perianal pain were the principal symptoms at the time of presentation. No symptoms have been reported only in three patients (3 out of 150, 2%). Regarding the prior surgical history of the patients, multiple abscess drainage and perianal fistula's related interventions were present in 62 (41.3%) and 19 (12.7%) patients, respectively. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was administered in 53 out of 150 patients (35.3%), while the majority of them have been treated with combined treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. APR and its variations were the most applied surgical treatment (68%). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was administered almost up to one-third of the included patients (34%). Recurrence of the disease was reported in 41 out of 150 patients (27.3%). Death was reported in 44 out of 150 patients (29.3%).

Conclusion: Review of the available published literature suggests that perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma is an extremely rare neoplasia. Τhere is no consensus as far as the diagnosis and the treatment strategies, due to the rarity of this neoplasm. High degree of clinical suspicion as well as histopathological confirmation is the principal requisites for the diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma, especially in the ground of chronic ulcero-proliferative perianal lesions.

背景:肛门黏液腺癌是一种不常见的胃肠道肿瘤。在大多数病例中,由于其症状经常与良性炎症相似,因此很难早期诊断:方法:对 PubMed 和 Scopus 进行了系统检索,并提出了病例报告:结果:共收录了 93 份病例报告中的 150 名患者。患者的平均年龄为 60.5 岁(18-81 岁)。大多数患者为男性(150 例中有 124 例,占 82.7%),已知的主要风险因素是慢性瘘管病史(150 例中有 109 例,占 72.7%)。复发性肛周败血症和肛周疼痛是患者发病时的主要症状。只有三名患者(150 例中有 3 例,占 2%)没有任何症状。关于患者之前的手术史,分别有62名(41.3%)和19名(12.7%)患者接受过多次脓肿引流术和肛周瘘相关手术。150 例患者中有 53 例(35.3%)接受了新辅助化疗和放疗,其中大部分患者接受了化疗和放疗联合治疗。APR及其变体是应用最多的外科治疗方法(68%)。几乎有三分之一的患者(34%)接受了辅助化放疗。据报告,150名患者中有41人(27.3%)复发。150例患者中有44例(29.3%)死亡:对已发表文献的回顾表明,肛周粘液腺癌是一种极为罕见的肿瘤。由于这种肿瘤的罕见性,在诊断和治疗策略方面尚未达成共识。高度的临床怀疑和组织病理学证实是诊断粘液腺癌的主要条件,尤其是在肛周慢性溃疡增生性病变的情况下。
{"title":"Perianal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and a Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Ioannis D Gkegkes, Vassilis Milionis, Nikolaos Goutas, Ioannis Mantzoros, Antonia A Bourtzinakou, Apostolos P Stamatiadis","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01116-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-024-01116-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mucinous adenocarcinoma of anus is an uncommon neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. In most of the cases, early diagnosis of this disease is difficult since its symptoms frequently mimic benign inflammatory conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted, a propos of a case report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty patients from 93 case reports were included. The mean age of the patients was 60.5 years (range: 18-81). The majority of them were males (124 out of 150, 82.7%), while the main known risk factor was the history of chronic fistula (109 out of 150, 72.7%). Recurrent perianal sepsis and perianal pain were the principal symptoms at the time of presentation. No symptoms have been reported only in three patients (3 out of 150, 2%). Regarding the prior surgical history of the patients, multiple abscess drainage and perianal fistula's related interventions were present in 62 (41.3%) and 19 (12.7%) patients, respectively. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was administered in 53 out of 150 patients (35.3%), while the majority of them have been treated with combined treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. APR and its variations were the most applied surgical treatment (68%). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was administered almost up to one-third of the included patients (34%). Recurrence of the disease was reported in 41 out of 150 patients (27.3%). Death was reported in 44 out of 150 patients (29.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Review of the available published literature suggests that perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma is an extremely rare neoplasia. Τhere is no consensus as far as the diagnosis and the treatment strategies, due to the rarity of this neoplasm. High degree of clinical suspicion as well as histopathological confirmation is the principal requisites for the diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma, especially in the ground of chronic ulcero-proliferative perianal lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on "Association Between Vitamin Intake and Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from NHANES Data". 关于 "维生素摄入量与结直肠癌之间的关系:来自 NHANES 数据的证据"。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01127-2
Zefang Li
{"title":"Comment on \"Association Between Vitamin Intake and Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from NHANES Data\".","authors":"Zefang Li","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01127-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01127-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening After a Normal Colonoscopy. 多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在结肠镜检查正常后进行结直肠癌筛查的实用性。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01118-3
Abhinav K Rao, Shivam Kalra, Brett Van Leer-Greenberg, Don C Rockey

Background: Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests (here, Cologuard®) are currently used in average-risk patients as a primary method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, MT-sDNA testing has also been used in patients who previously underwent colonoscopy who wish to avoid repeat colonoscopy. Here, in a large primary care practice setting, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA testing in patients with a previously normal colonoscopy.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 5827 patients from 35 different primary locations in South Carolina. Patients aged 45 and above with a previously documented normal, high-quality colonoscopy prior to the MT-sDNA test date were included. High-risk patients and those with a previous negative MT-sDNA result were excluded.

Results: Of 5827 ordered MT-sDNA tests, 248 patients had a prior normal colonoscopy. The average time from initial colonoscopy to MT-sDNA testing was 7.3 years. Of the 63 patients who had a positive MT-sDNA test, 41 patients (65%) completed follow-up colonoscopy and 40 patients had complete colonoscopy data. Of these 40 patients, 12 patients (30%) had advanced adenomas and none had colorectal cancer. Compared to patients without a previous colonoscopy, patients with prior colonoscopies had fewer adenomas of all types (1.6 vs 2.4) and fewer advanced adenomas (1.4 vs 2.0).

Conclusion: Patients with a previously negative colonoscopy and subsequent positive MT-sDNA test were found to have a high rate of advanced adenomas on follow-up colonoscopy (30%). Thus, in patients with a previously negative colonoscopy, MT-sDNA testing may be a reasonable alternative screening option.

背景:多靶点粪便 DNA(MT-sDNA)检测(此处为 Cologuard®)目前用于普通风险患者,作为筛查结直肠癌的主要方法。然而,MT-sDNA 检测也被用于曾接受过结肠镜检查但希望避免再次接受结肠镜检查的患者。在这里,我们的目的是在大型初级医疗机构中评估 MT-sDNA 检测对结肠镜检查结果正常的患者的诊断效果:这项回顾性队列研究包括来自南卡罗来纳州 35 个不同基层医疗机构的 5827 名患者。研究对象包括年龄在 45 岁及以上、在 MT-sDNA 检测日期前曾接受过正常、高质量结肠镜检查的患者。不包括高危患者和 MT-sDNA 结果为阴性的患者:结果:在 5827 位接受 MT-sDNA 检测的患者中,有 248 位患者之前的结肠镜检查结果正常。从初次结肠镜检查到 MT-sDNA 检测的平均时间为 7.3 年。在 MT-sDNA 检测呈阳性的 63 名患者中,41 名患者(65%)完成了后续结肠镜检查,40 名患者有完整的结肠镜检查数据。在这 40 名患者中,12 名患者(30%)患有晚期腺瘤,没有人罹患大肠癌。与既往未接受过结肠镜检查的患者相比,既往接受过结肠镜检查的患者所有类型腺瘤的数量较少(1.6 对 2.4),晚期腺瘤的数量较少(1.4 对 2.0):结论:先前结肠镜检查呈阴性、随后 MT-sDNA 检测呈阳性的患者在后续结肠镜检查中发现晚期腺瘤的比例较高(30%)。因此,对于结肠镜检查阴性的患者,MT-DNA 检测可能是一种合理的替代筛查选择。
{"title":"The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening After a Normal Colonoscopy.","authors":"Abhinav K Rao, Shivam Kalra, Brett Van Leer-Greenberg, Don C Rockey","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01118-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01118-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests (here, Cologuard®) are currently used in average-risk patients as a primary method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, MT-sDNA testing has also been used in patients who previously underwent colonoscopy who wish to avoid repeat colonoscopy. Here, in a large primary care practice setting, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA testing in patients with a previously normal colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 5827 patients from 35 different primary locations in South Carolina. Patients aged 45 and above with a previously documented normal, high-quality colonoscopy prior to the MT-sDNA test date were included. High-risk patients and those with a previous negative MT-sDNA result were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5827 ordered MT-sDNA tests, 248 patients had a prior normal colonoscopy. The average time from initial colonoscopy to MT-sDNA testing was 7.3 years. Of the 63 patients who had a positive MT-sDNA test, 41 patients (65%) completed follow-up colonoscopy and 40 patients had complete colonoscopy data. Of these 40 patients, 12 patients (30%) had advanced adenomas and none had colorectal cancer. Compared to patients without a previous colonoscopy, patients with prior colonoscopies had fewer adenomas of all types (1.6 vs 2.4) and fewer advanced adenomas (1.4 vs 2.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a previously negative colonoscopy and subsequent positive MT-sDNA test were found to have a high rate of advanced adenomas on follow-up colonoscopy (30%). Thus, in patients with a previously negative colonoscopy, MT-sDNA testing may be a reasonable alternative screening option.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Elevated Urinary Levels of Fungal and Environmental Toxins in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. 胰腺导管腺癌患者尿液中真菌和环境毒素水平升高
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01125-4
Vanessa I Rodriguez, Jamila Mammadova, Jennifer B Permuth, Anjuli Luthra, Luis Pena, Mark Friedman, Aamir Dam, Saraswathi Cappelle, Mokenge P Malafa, Candice Hallmon, Cassandra Miranda, Shaffer R S Mok

Background: Risk factors for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) include tobacco/alcohol abuse, genetic predisposition, insulin resistance, and pancreatic cysts. Despite these well-established risk factors and the screening of high-risk individuals, some people still develop PDAC. This study aims to explore a potential risk factor for PDAC by investigating the association between fungal toxins (FT) and environmental toxins (ET) and the disease. We predicted that individuals with PDAC would have higher levels of these toxins compared to healthy controls. The rationale behind this hypothesis is that exposure to FT and ET might contribute to the development of PDAC by elevating cancer risk.

Methods: A pilot retrospective cohort study was conducted at Moffitt Cancer Center from 2022 to 2023. This study compared FT and ET levels, demographic data, and PDAC features between subjects with PDAC and healthy controls.

Results: Forty subjects were enrolled in the study, comprising 20 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and 20 healthy controls. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Among the PDAC subjects, the most common tumor location was the head of the pancreas (55%); 30% had locally advanced disease, 45% were borderline resectable, and 10% had metastatic disease. Compared to the controls, subjects with PDAC had significantly higher levels of fungal toxins (FTs) including ochratoxin, gliotoxin, and citrinin (p < 0.05). Additionally, PDAC patients had significantly elevated levels of environmental toxins (ETs) such as methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), xylene, styrene, acrylonitrile, perchlorate, diphenyl phosphate, bromopropane, organophosphates, acrolein, tiglylglycine, and diethylphosphate (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that subjects with PDAC, without other risk factors, have higher FT and ET levels than controls. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether ET and FT exposure can be clinically utilized as a risk factor for PDAC development.

背景:胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的风险因素包括吸烟/酗酒、遗传倾向、胰岛素抵抗和胰腺囊肿。尽管存在这些公认的风险因素并对高危人群进行了筛查,但仍有一些人罹患 PDAC。本研究旨在通过调查真菌毒素(FT)和环境毒素(ET)与 PDAC 之间的关联,探索 PDAC 的潜在风险因素。我们预测,与健康对照组相比,PDAC 患者体内的这些毒素水平会更高。提出这一假设的理由是,暴露于 FT 和 ET 可能会增加患癌风险,从而导致 PDAC 的发生:2022 年至 2023 年,莫菲特癌症中心开展了一项试点回顾性队列研究。该研究比较了 PDAC 患者和健康对照组的 FT 和 ET 水平、人口统计学数据和 PDAC 特征:研究共招募了 40 名受试者,包括 20 名胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者和 20 名健康对照者。两组受试者的基线人口统计学特征相似。在PDAC受试者中,最常见的肿瘤位置是胰头(55%);30%为局部晚期疾病,45%为边缘可切除,10%为转移性疾病。与对照组相比,PDAC 患者的真菌毒素(FTs)水平明显更高,包括赭曲霉毒素、胶霉素和枸橼霉素(P < 0.05)。此外,PDAC 患者的环境毒素(ETs)水平也明显升高,如甲基叔丁基醚(MTBE)、二甲苯、苯乙烯、丙烯腈、高氯酸盐、磷酸二苯酯、溴丙烷、有机磷、丙烯醛、替甘氨酸和磷酸二乙酯(P < 0.05):我们的研究表明,在没有其他危险因素的情况下,PDAC 患者的 FT 和 ET 水平高于对照组。还需要进一步研究,以评估ET和FT暴露是否可作为PDAC发病的临床风险因素。
{"title":"Elevated Urinary Levels of Fungal and Environmental Toxins in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Vanessa I Rodriguez, Jamila Mammadova, Jennifer B Permuth, Anjuli Luthra, Luis Pena, Mark Friedman, Aamir Dam, Saraswathi Cappelle, Mokenge P Malafa, Candice Hallmon, Cassandra Miranda, Shaffer R S Mok","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01125-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01125-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) include tobacco/alcohol abuse, genetic predisposition, insulin resistance, and pancreatic cysts. Despite these well-established risk factors and the screening of high-risk individuals, some people still develop PDAC. This study aims to explore a potential risk factor for PDAC by investigating the association between fungal toxins (FT) and environmental toxins (ET) and the disease. We predicted that individuals with PDAC would have higher levels of these toxins compared to healthy controls. The rationale behind this hypothesis is that exposure to FT and ET might contribute to the development of PDAC by elevating cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot retrospective cohort study was conducted at Moffitt Cancer Center from 2022 to 2023. This study compared FT and ET levels, demographic data, and PDAC features between subjects with PDAC and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty subjects were enrolled in the study, comprising 20 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and 20 healthy controls. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Among the PDAC subjects, the most common tumor location was the head of the pancreas (55%); 30% had locally advanced disease, 45% were borderline resectable, and 10% had metastatic disease. Compared to the controls, subjects with PDAC had significantly higher levels of fungal toxins (FTs) including ochratoxin, gliotoxin, and citrinin (p < 0.05). Additionally, PDAC patients had significantly elevated levels of environmental toxins (ETs) such as methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), xylene, styrene, acrylonitrile, perchlorate, diphenyl phosphate, bromopropane, organophosphates, acrolein, tiglylglycine, and diethylphosphate (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that subjects with PDAC, without other risk factors, have higher FT and ET levels than controls. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether ET and FT exposure can be clinically utilized as a risk factor for PDAC development.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486816/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1