首页 > 最新文献

Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism最新文献

英文 中文
Lorcaserin induces abdominal fat loss with associated improvements of the circulating metabolome/lipidome and no changes in the myostatin-activin-follistatin-IGF-1 axes: A 6-month long randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. 一项为期6个月的随机安慰剂对照临床试验:氯卡塞林诱导腹部脂肪减少,同时改善循环代谢组/脂质组,而肌生成他汀-激活-卵泡他汀- igf -1轴没有变化。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70496
Arantxa Ramirez-Cisneros, Valeria Gutierrez de Piñeres, Claudia S Tamayo-Torres, Konstantinos Stefanakis, Angeliki M Angelidi, Lynn Fu, Georgia Anastasiou, Christos S Mantzoros

Background: Effective anti-obesity interventions that preserve lean mass are of increasing clinical significance for optimizing metabolic health. This study investigated whether lorcaserin, a centrally acting weight loss agent, modifies body composition, circulating lipidomic profiles, and muscle-regulating hormones within the myostatin-activin-follistatin-IGF-1 (MAFI) axes.

Methods: Forty-eight adults with obesity were randomized to lorcaserin (10 mg twice daily) or placebo for 6 months in a double-blind trial. Regional body composition, hormones and lipidomics were assessed. Changes were analysed using linear mixed models with fixed effects for time, treatment and interaction. Adjusted deltas and endpoints were compared by analysis of covariance controlling for baseline body mass index. Lipidomic profiles were analysed using principal component and partial least-squares discriminant analyses.

Results: Lorcaserin reduced total body weight (time*treatment, p = 0.004). Adjusted delta and endpoint comparisons showed reductions in total body (p = 0.031) and abdominal fat mass (p = 0.002). Lipidomic assessments revealed primarily lower levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins with treatment. No significant changes in MAFI axes components were detected in linear mixed models.

Conclusions: Lorcaserin treatment was associated with greater abdominal fat mass loss, favourable lipid profile changes, while MAFI components remained largely unaffected. Lorcaserin may improve cardiometabolic health primarily through reductions in central adiposity.

背景:有效的抗肥胖干预措施对优化代谢健康具有越来越重要的临床意义。本研究调查了氯卡色林,一种中枢作用的减肥药,是否在肌生成抑制素-激活素-卵泡抑制素- igf -1 (MAFI)轴内改变身体成分、循环脂质谱和肌肉调节激素。方法:在一项双盲试验中,48名肥胖成年人随机接受氯卡色林(10mg,每日两次)或安慰剂治疗,为期6个月。评估区域体成分、激素和脂质组学。使用具有固定时间、治疗和相互作用效应的线性混合模型分析变化。通过协方差分析对基线体重指数进行控制,比较调整后的delta值和终点值。使用主成分和偏最小二乘判别分析分析脂质组学特征。结果:氯卡色林降低总体重(时间*治疗,p = 0.004)。调整后的δ值和终点比较显示总体(p = 0.031)和腹部脂肪量(p = 0.002)减少。脂质组学评估主要显示治疗后富甘油三酯脂蛋白水平降低。线性混合模型中MAFI轴分量未见明显变化。结论:氯卡色林治疗与腹部脂肪量减少、有利的脂质变化有关,而MAFI成分在很大程度上未受影响。氯卡色林可能主要通过减少中枢性肥胖来改善心脏代谢健康。
{"title":"Lorcaserin induces abdominal fat loss with associated improvements of the circulating metabolome/lipidome and no changes in the myostatin-activin-follistatin-IGF-1 axes: A 6-month long randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Arantxa Ramirez-Cisneros, Valeria Gutierrez de Piñeres, Claudia S Tamayo-Torres, Konstantinos Stefanakis, Angeliki M Angelidi, Lynn Fu, Georgia Anastasiou, Christos S Mantzoros","doi":"10.1111/dom.70496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70496","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective anti-obesity interventions that preserve lean mass are of increasing clinical significance for optimizing metabolic health. This study investigated whether lorcaserin, a centrally acting weight loss agent, modifies body composition, circulating lipidomic profiles, and muscle-regulating hormones within the myostatin-activin-follistatin-IGF-1 (MAFI) axes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight adults with obesity were randomized to lorcaserin (10 mg twice daily) or placebo for 6 months in a double-blind trial. Regional body composition, hormones and lipidomics were assessed. Changes were analysed using linear mixed models with fixed effects for time, treatment and interaction. Adjusted deltas and endpoints were compared by analysis of covariance controlling for baseline body mass index. Lipidomic profiles were analysed using principal component and partial least-squares discriminant analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lorcaserin reduced total body weight (time*treatment, p = 0.004). Adjusted delta and endpoint comparisons showed reductions in total body (p = 0.031) and abdominal fat mass (p = 0.002). Lipidomic assessments revealed primarily lower levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins with treatment. No significant changes in MAFI axes components were detected in linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lorcaserin treatment was associated with greater abdominal fat mass loss, favourable lipid profile changes, while MAFI components remained largely unaffected. Lorcaserin may improve cardiometabolic health primarily through reductions in central adiposity.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146027955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CGM-derived efficacy and overall safety of once-weekly insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora) relative to day of administration in adults with type 2 diabetes 相对于给药日,成人2型糖尿病患者每周一次的efsitora α胰岛素(efsitora)的cgm衍生的疗效和总体安全性。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70419
Thomas Martens MD, Tadej Battelino MD, Simon Heller BM, Anuj Bhargava MD, Linong Ji, Sreenivasa Murthy MD, Rebecca J. Threlkeld MS, Xiaoqi Li PhD, Ada Leticia Murro MD, Kristen Syring PhD, Vidhi Patel PharmD
<p>As type 2 diabetes (T2D) progresses, the addition of basal insulin to a treatment regimen is often needed to maintain glycaemic control. However, daily basal insulins, which require at least 365 injections per year, can negatively impact treatment adherence and increase the perceived burden associated with diabetes management. Once-weekly basal insulins have the potential to reduce treatment burden and positively impact adherence and glycaemic control.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span></p><p>Insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora), a once-weekly basal insulin, has a flat pharmacokinetic (PK) profile with a peak-to-trough ratio of 1.16, similar to physiological insulin profiles.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Efsitora also showed a consistent glucose-lowering effect across the week during a euglycaemic clamp study. Phase 3 efsitora studies demonstrated similar efficacy and safety profiles compared to the once-daily basal insulin comparators in adults with T2D.<span><sup>4-7</sup></span> The consistency of glucose control and safety between weekly injections of basal insulin has not been characterised for the efsitora T2D phase 3 study populations.</p><p>This post-hoc analysis aimed to assess the impact of the flat efsitora PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles on time in glucose range and rates of hypoglycaemia across the week, in adults with T2D.</p><p>This post-hoc analysis assessed the glycaemic efficacy and hypoglycaemic rates across the week using data from participants treated with efsitora in three phase 3 trials in adults with T2D: QWINT-2 (insulin naïve), QWINT-3 (basal insulin-treated), and QWINT-4 (basal and prandial insulin-treated). The primary methods and results from these trials were published previously.<span><sup>4-6, 8</sup></span></p><p>Participants were randomised to receive weekly efsitora or the daily basal insulin comparator (QWINT-2 and QWINT-3: degludec; QWINT-4: glargine) to reach a target fasting glucose (FG) concentration of 4.4–6.6 mmol/L (80–120 mg/dL). Efsitora was administered subcutaneously once weekly, and titrated weekly for the first 12 weeks and a minimum of monthly thereafter. The daily basal insulin comparator was administered daily and titrated weekly based on a titration algorithm. Titration of efsitora and the daily basal insulin comparators was based on the median of the three most recent self-monitored FG values and the occurrence and severity of hypoglycaemia.<span><sup>8</sup></span></p><p>QWINT-2, QWINT-3, and QWINT-4 had 52-, 78-, and 26-week treatment periods, with primary endpoints at week 52, 26, and 26, respectively. Periodic 4-week masked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sessions were included in the three studies to characterise the 24-h glycaemic control over time.</p><p>For each trial, metrics from intermittent masked CGM data collections (time in range [TIR; 3.9–10.0 mmol/L (70–180 mg/dL)], time below range [TBR: <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) or 3.0–3.9 mmol/L (54–70 mg/dL)], and time above range [TAR: 10.0–
随着2型糖尿病(T2D)的进展,通常需要在治疗方案中添加基础胰岛素来维持血糖控制。然而,每日基础胰岛素(每年至少需要365次注射)会对治疗依从性产生负面影响,并增加与糖尿病管理相关的感知负担。每周一次的基础胰岛素有可能减轻治疗负担,并对依从性和血糖控制产生积极影响。1、每周一次的基础胰岛素(efsitora)具有平坦的药代动力学(PK)谱,峰谷比为1.16,与生理胰岛素谱相似在一项血糖钳夹研究中,Efsitora也显示出持续一周的降血糖效果。3期efsitora研究表明,与每日一次的基础胰岛素比较剂相比,成人T2D患者的疗效和安全性相似。4-7在efsitora T2D 3期研究人群中,每周注射基础胰岛素的血糖控制一致性和安全性尚未确定。这一事后分析旨在评估扁平efsitora的PK和药效学(PD)谱对糖尿病成人患者一周内血糖范围和低血糖率的影响。这项事后分析利用efsitora治疗的三个3期T2D成人试验的数据评估了一周内的降糖疗效和低血糖率:QWINT-2(胰岛素naïve)、QWINT-3(基础胰岛素治疗)和QWINT-4(基础和膳食胰岛素治疗)。这些试验的主要方法和结果先前已发表。参与者被随机分配接受每周efsitora或每日基础胰岛素比较剂(QWINT-2和QWINT-3: degludec; QWINT-4:甘精),以达到4.4-6.6 mmol/L (80-120 mg/dL)的目标空腹血糖(FG)浓度。Efsitora每周一次皮下给药,前12周每周滴定一次,之后至少每月滴定一次。每日基础胰岛素比较器每日给药,并根据滴定算法每周滴定。efsitora和每日基础胰岛素比较器的滴定是基于最近三个自我监测的FG值的中位数以及低血糖的发生和严重程度。8QWINT-2、QWINT-3和QWINT-4的治疗期分别为52周、78周和26周,主要终点分别为52周、26周和26周。这三项研究包括了为期4周的周期性连续血糖监测(CGM),以描述24小时血糖控制的特征。对于每个试验,相对于efsitora给药当天(第0天),计算间歇性掩盖CGM数据收集的指标(范围内时间[TIR; 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL)],低于范围的时间[TBR: 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL)或3.0 - 3.9 mmol/L (54 - 70 mg/dL)]和高于范围的时间[TAR: 10.0-13.9 mmol/L (180-250 mg/dL)或13.9 mmol/L (250 mg/dL)])。每日胰岛素比较器CGM度量数据的推导使得CGM疗程的第一天被认为是“第0天”,CGM疗程的连续几天代表第1-6天,并重复直到疗程结束。由于在整个治疗期间没有进行CGM,因此基于自我监测血糖的参与者报告的低血糖事件进行了分析,以表征整个治疗期间的总体低血糖率。在整个治疗期间,分析受试者报告的2级(54 mg/dL; 3.0 mmol/L)或3级(严重)低血糖发生率。提供了简要统计数据。对于患有T2D的成人,Efsitora治疗导致整个星期的TIR和TBR(相对于给药日)一致。2级或3级低血糖的合并率在efsitora的整个星期也保持一致,并且低血糖在整个星期都远低于指南推荐的4% TBR (70 mg/dL; 3.9 mmol/L)的目标总的来说,这些发现表明,每周一次的efsitora在两次剂量之间提供了安全稳定的血糖控制。这些数据补充了efsitora的平坦PK和PD谱,以及在3期试验中HbA1c的降低和观察到的低血糖率。4-7整个星期一致的疗效和安全性数据可以为考虑使用每周一次efsitora的医疗保健提供者和糖尿病患者提供保证。未来的真实世界数据可能会深入了解每周一次的血糖参数efsitora的一致性和注射频率的降低如何影响t2dm患者的治疗负担。虽然这些数据为整个星期内efsitora血糖控制的一致性提供了有价值的见解,但在整个治疗期间,CGM数据并不是连续的。 此外,试验参与者达到70%的TIR受到以下事实的限制:这些研究被设计为基础胰岛素非劣效性研究,而不是TIR优化研究。然而,亚组分析表明,在24小时内达到70% TIR推荐目标的参与者的TBR仍然低于基于指南的共识建议。此外,试验排除标准将非胰岛素降糖药的使用限制在那些不太可能导致低血糖的药物上,例如在QWINT-3和-4中排除磺脲类药物。这两个因素都可能影响2级或3级低血糖的报告率。这种事后分析的优势平衡了这些局限性。也就是说,这些试验包括去葡萄糖酸胰岛素和甘精胰岛素作为活性比较物,并且在每个研究的多个时间点进行隐蔽的CGM会议。被掩盖的CGM防止了参与者主动治疗低血糖警报的潜在偏差。此外,试验中糖尿病治疗不同阶段的全球参与者人数众多,这有助于结果的通用性。最后,FG指标在为这些人群建议的指导方针范围内。接受efsitora治疗的成年t2dm患者,无论之前是否使用过胰岛素,在整个一周内都表现出一致的血糖控制和低血糖率。这一事后分析表明,efsitora是目前每日基础胰岛素治疗的一种安全稳定的替代方案,有可能减轻治疗负担。Thomas Martens、Rebecca J. Threlkeld、Xiaoqi Li、Ada Leticia Murro、Kristen Syring和Vidhi Patel参与了研究设计和数据分析。李晓琪进行了统计分析。所有作者都参与了研究结果的解释以及手稿最终版本的关键修改和批准。这项研究是由礼来公司资助的。Thomas Martens报告了在研究进行期间获得雅培、Dexcom、胰岛素、礼来、美敦力、诺和诺德、赛诺菲和Tandem的资助,以及Medscape的资助,一项动态葡萄糖谱CGM可视化格式的专利正在申请中,以及HealthPartners研究所提交的工作之外的薪水。Tadej Battelino获得了美敦力、礼来、诺和诺德、雅培、Dexcom、赛诺菲和罗氏的顾问或演讲费,美敦力、诺和诺德、赛诺菲、礼来、勃林格英格翰、雅培、Dreamed Diabetes和Indigo Diabetes的顾问委员会费,以及美敦力、雅培、诺和诺德、GluSense、赛诺菲、山德士和Zealand Pharma的研究资助。Simon Heller报告了Zealand Pharma和Zucara Therapeutics的咨询费;参与诺和诺德演讲小组的费用;数据监测和安全委员会参与礼来公司;以及Dexcom的研究支持。Anuj Bhargava通过爱荷华糖尿病研究中心获得了雅培糖尿病护理、艾伯维、阿克罗治疗、芭芭拉戴维斯糖尿病中心、勃林格殷格翰制药公司、卡莫治疗公司、科万斯公司、Dexcom公司、礼来公司、Gasherbrum生物公司、胰岛素公司、IQVIA公司、科和制药美国公司、Madrigal制药公司、MannKind公司、美敦力公司、诺和诺德公司、赛默飞世尔科学公司、艾奥瓦糖尿病研究中心的资助或研究支持。Viking Therapeutics, vTvTherapeutics LLC, Zydus Pharmaceuticals和89Bio, Inc.。纪力农曾获得阿斯利康、默克、Metabasi
{"title":"CGM-derived efficacy and overall safety of once-weekly insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora) relative to day of administration in adults with type 2 diabetes","authors":"Thomas Martens MD,&nbsp;Tadej Battelino MD,&nbsp;Simon Heller BM,&nbsp;Anuj Bhargava MD,&nbsp;Linong Ji,&nbsp;Sreenivasa Murthy MD,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Threlkeld MS,&nbsp;Xiaoqi Li PhD,&nbsp;Ada Leticia Murro MD,&nbsp;Kristen Syring PhD,&nbsp;Vidhi Patel PharmD","doi":"10.1111/dom.70419","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dom.70419","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;As type 2 diabetes (T2D) progresses, the addition of basal insulin to a treatment regimen is often needed to maintain glycaemic control. However, daily basal insulins, which require at least 365 injections per year, can negatively impact treatment adherence and increase the perceived burden associated with diabetes management. Once-weekly basal insulins have the potential to reduce treatment burden and positively impact adherence and glycaemic control.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1, 2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora), a once-weekly basal insulin, has a flat pharmacokinetic (PK) profile with a peak-to-trough ratio of 1.16, similar to physiological insulin profiles.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Efsitora also showed a consistent glucose-lowering effect across the week during a euglycaemic clamp study. Phase 3 efsitora studies demonstrated similar efficacy and safety profiles compared to the once-daily basal insulin comparators in adults with T2D.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4-7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The consistency of glucose control and safety between weekly injections of basal insulin has not been characterised for the efsitora T2D phase 3 study populations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This post-hoc analysis aimed to assess the impact of the flat efsitora PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles on time in glucose range and rates of hypoglycaemia across the week, in adults with T2D.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This post-hoc analysis assessed the glycaemic efficacy and hypoglycaemic rates across the week using data from participants treated with efsitora in three phase 3 trials in adults with T2D: QWINT-2 (insulin naïve), QWINT-3 (basal insulin-treated), and QWINT-4 (basal and prandial insulin-treated). The primary methods and results from these trials were published previously.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4-6, 8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Participants were randomised to receive weekly efsitora or the daily basal insulin comparator (QWINT-2 and QWINT-3: degludec; QWINT-4: glargine) to reach a target fasting glucose (FG) concentration of 4.4–6.6 mmol/L (80–120 mg/dL). Efsitora was administered subcutaneously once weekly, and titrated weekly for the first 12 weeks and a minimum of monthly thereafter. The daily basal insulin comparator was administered daily and titrated weekly based on a titration algorithm. Titration of efsitora and the daily basal insulin comparators was based on the median of the three most recent self-monitored FG values and the occurrence and severity of hypoglycaemia.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;QWINT-2, QWINT-3, and QWINT-4 had 52-, 78-, and 26-week treatment periods, with primary endpoints at week 52, 26, and 26, respectively. Periodic 4-week masked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sessions were included in the three studies to characterise the 24-h glycaemic control over time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For each trial, metrics from intermittent masked CGM data collections (time in range [TIR; 3.9–10.0 mmol/L (70–180 mg/dL)], time below range [TBR: &lt;3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) or 3.0–3.9 mmol/L (54–70 mg/dL)], and time above range [TAR: 10.0–","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"28 3","pages":"2482-2486"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dom.70419","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146027934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal exposure to non-HDL-C and cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of the ACCORD trial. 2型糖尿病纵向暴露于非hdl -c和心血管事件、全因死亡率:ACCORD试验的事后分析
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70498
Yueyue Wang, Xi Meng, Xiaoyun Zhang, Mian Li, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Jieli Lu, Min Xu, Jie Zheng, Weiqing Wang, Guang Ning, Yufang Bi, Yu Xu

Aims: To evaluate the association between longitudinal non-HDL-C exposure and the risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients on lipid-lowering therapy.

Materials and methods: This post hoc analysis of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid trial included patients with type 2 diabetes who had non-HDL-C measured at baseline and four subsequent visits over 24 months. Longitudinal exposure was assessed using cumulative load, variability (standard deviation) and trajectory (slope). Outcomes were MACEs and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Among 4673 participants with a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 695 MACEs and 842 deaths occurred. After adjusting for baseline and mean non-HDL-C levels, the highest quartile of cumulative load (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.41-2.32), variability (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.60) and the most rapidly increasing slope (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.56) were each associated with increased risks of MACEs, compared to the lowest quartile. The association with all-cause mortality followed a similar pattern, except for the non-HDL-C slope. Stratified analyses showed that cumulative load and variability were associated with MACEs among participants with baseline non-HDL-C < 130 mg/dL, and with all-cause mortality among those with baseline ≥130 mg/dL. No significant associations with slope were observed within strata of baseline non-HDL-C.

Conclusions: Longitudinal non-HDL-C exposure showed associations with both MACEs and mortality, independent of baseline non-HDL-C, underscoring the need for sustained and stable non-HDL-C control over time.

目的:评估纵向非hdl -c暴露与接受降脂治疗的2型糖尿病患者主要不良心血管事件(mace)风险和全因死亡率之间的关系。材料和方法:这项控制糖尿病心血管风险的行动(ACCORD)脂质试验的事后分析纳入了2型糖尿病患者,这些患者在基线时测量了非hdl - c,并在24个月内随访了4次。纵向暴露评估使用累积负荷,变异性(标准差)和轨迹(斜率)。结果是mace和全因死亡率。采用Cox比例风险模型获得风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:4673名参与者中位随访时间为7.5年,发生了695例mace和842例死亡。在调整基线和平均非hdl - c水平后,与最低四分位数相比,累积负荷的最高四分位数(HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.41-2.32)、变异性(HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.60)和增长最快的斜率(HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.56)均与mace风险增加相关。除了非hdl -c斜率外,与全因死亡率的关联也遵循类似的模式。分层分析显示,累积负荷和可变性与基线非hdl - c参与者的mace相关。结论:纵向非hdl - c暴露与mace和死亡率相关,与基线非hdl - c无关,强调需要长期持续稳定地控制非hdl - c。
{"title":"Longitudinal exposure to non-HDL-C and cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of the ACCORD trial.","authors":"Yueyue Wang, Xi Meng, Xiaoyun Zhang, Mian Li, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Jieli Lu, Min Xu, Jie Zheng, Weiqing Wang, Guang Ning, Yufang Bi, Yu Xu","doi":"10.1111/dom.70498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70498","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the association between longitudinal non-HDL-C exposure and the risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients on lipid-lowering therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid trial included patients with type 2 diabetes who had non-HDL-C measured at baseline and four subsequent visits over 24 months. Longitudinal exposure was assessed using cumulative load, variability (standard deviation) and trajectory (slope). Outcomes were MACEs and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4673 participants with a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 695 MACEs and 842 deaths occurred. After adjusting for baseline and mean non-HDL-C levels, the highest quartile of cumulative load (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.41-2.32), variability (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.60) and the most rapidly increasing slope (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.56) were each associated with increased risks of MACEs, compared to the lowest quartile. The association with all-cause mortality followed a similar pattern, except for the non-HDL-C slope. Stratified analyses showed that cumulative load and variability were associated with MACEs among participants with baseline non-HDL-C < 130 mg/dL, and with all-cause mortality among those with baseline ≥130 mg/dL. No significant associations with slope were observed within strata of baseline non-HDL-C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longitudinal non-HDL-C exposure showed associations with both MACEs and mortality, independent of baseline non-HDL-C, underscoring the need for sustained and stable non-HDL-C control over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is AMP-activated protein kinase activation a central mechanism of cardio-metabolic outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery? amp激活的蛋白激酶是代谢和减肥手术后心脏代谢结果的中心机制吗?
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70477
Adrien Delcour, Nathalie Niederhoffer

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. It usually results in spectacular weight loss, associated with improvements of obesity-associated comorbidities. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are not fully understood but could involve a postoperative activation of the enzyme 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Hence, as AMPK is largely expressed in insulin-sensitive cells, it acts as a key regulator of cardio-metabolic homeostasis, and its activity is down-regulated in tissues from obese, insulin resistant patients. This narrative review aims to summarise the available clinical data regarding changes in AMPK activity following MBS and to discuss the potential relevance of these changes in postoperative physiology. The eight studies reporting specifically changes in AMPK activity following MBS in humans were analysed. They all showed increases in AMPK activity in tissues or blood cells, with effects observed as early as 3 months and persisting beyond 12 months post-surgery. However, the data does not allow us to conclude on (i) the potential specificity of effects depending on the surgery procedure, (ii) the mechanisms involved in the AMPK activation, and (iii) its role in postoperative metabolic outcomes, highlighting that further investigations are warranted to address these issues. Understanding AMPK changes in postoperative physiology could establish its relevance as a potential prognostic marker of surgery metabolic outcomes and as a new target to improve the benefits of MBS. More generally, it may provide insights into the development of novel therapeutic strategies for obesity and associated comorbidities.

代谢和减肥手术(MBS)是治疗严重肥胖最有效的方法。它通常会导致显著的体重减轻,并伴有肥胖相关合并症的改善。这些益处的机制尚不完全清楚,但可能涉及5' amp活化蛋白激酶(AMPK)的术后活化。因此,由于AMPK在胰岛素敏感细胞中大量表达,它作为心脏代谢稳态的关键调节因子,在肥胖、胰岛素抵抗患者的组织中其活性下调。这篇叙述性综述旨在总结MBS后AMPK活性变化的现有临床数据,并讨论这些变化与术后生理学的潜在相关性。分析了8项报告人类MBS后AMPK活性特异性变化的研究。他们都表现出组织或血细胞中AMPK活性的增加,这种影响早在手术后3个月就观察到,并持续超过12个月。然而,这些数据并不能让我们得出以下结论:(i)取决于手术程序的潜在特异性效应,(ii) AMPK激活的机制,以及(iii)其在术后代谢结果中的作用,强调有必要进一步研究以解决这些问题。了解AMPK在术后生理学中的变化,可以确定其作为手术代谢结果的潜在预后标志物的相关性,并作为提高MBS益处的新靶点。更普遍的是,它可能为肥胖和相关合并症的新治疗策略的发展提供见解。
{"title":"Is AMP-activated protein kinase activation a central mechanism of cardio-metabolic outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery?","authors":"Adrien Delcour, Nathalie Niederhoffer","doi":"10.1111/dom.70477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. It usually results in spectacular weight loss, associated with improvements of obesity-associated comorbidities. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are not fully understood but could involve a postoperative activation of the enzyme 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Hence, as AMPK is largely expressed in insulin-sensitive cells, it acts as a key regulator of cardio-metabolic homeostasis, and its activity is down-regulated in tissues from obese, insulin resistant patients. This narrative review aims to summarise the available clinical data regarding changes in AMPK activity following MBS and to discuss the potential relevance of these changes in postoperative physiology. The eight studies reporting specifically changes in AMPK activity following MBS in humans were analysed. They all showed increases in AMPK activity in tissues or blood cells, with effects observed as early as 3 months and persisting beyond 12 months post-surgery. However, the data does not allow us to conclude on (i) the potential specificity of effects depending on the surgery procedure, (ii) the mechanisms involved in the AMPK activation, and (iii) its role in postoperative metabolic outcomes, highlighting that further investigations are warranted to address these issues. Understanding AMPK changes in postoperative physiology could establish its relevance as a potential prognostic marker of surgery metabolic outcomes and as a new target to improve the benefits of MBS. More generally, it may provide insights into the development of novel therapeutic strategies for obesity and associated comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146016649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
GLP-1 receptor agonists and cardiovascular outcomes in Asian, Black or African American, and White populations: An updated meta-analysis including the SOUL trial. GLP-1受体激动剂与亚洲、黑人或非裔美国人和白人人群心血管结局:一项包括SOUL试验的最新荟萃分析
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70458
Masashi Hasebe, Chen-Yang Su, Hisashi Kamido, Daisuke Yabe, Satoshi Yoshiji

Aims: To evaluate the cardiovascular efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in Asian, Black or African American, and White populations, and to assess whether the magnitude of cardiovascular risk reduction differs across these populations.

Materials and methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched to 11 November 2025 for randomized placebo-controlled GLP-1RA trials in adults with type 2 diabetes or overweight/obesity that reported race-stratified major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke). Hazard ratios (HRs) for MACE were extracted for Asian, Black or African American, and White populations. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to obtain pooled HRs and ratios of HRs (RHRs) comparing treatment effects between populations.

Results: Nine trials, including the recent SOUL trial, were included, comprising 8164 Asian, 4036 Black or African American, and 62 503 White participants. GLP-1RAs reduced MACE risk in Asian (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.63-0.85; p < 0.001) and White populations (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.91; p < 0.001). In Black or African American populations, the effect was similar to that in White populations (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.67-1.15; p = 0.34) but did not reach statistical significance. The pooled RHR for Asian versus White populations was 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.98; p = 0.027), indicating a significantly greater risk reduction in Asian populations. The RHR for Asian versus Black or African American populations was 0.81 (95% CI 0.57-1.16; p = 0.25), with point estimates favouring Asian populations.

Conclusions: GLP-1RAs reduced MACE risk across populations, with greater relative risk reduction in Asian populations and broadly similar benefits in Black or African American and White populations.

目的:评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)在亚洲、黑人或非裔美国人和白人人群中的心血管疗效,并评估这些人群心血管风险降低的程度是否不同。材料和方法:检索PubMed和EMBASE,检索截至2025年11月11日的随机安慰剂对照GLP-1RA试验,该试验在2型糖尿病或超重/肥胖的成年人中进行,这些患者报告了种族分层的主要不良心血管事件(MACE、心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死或非致死性卒中)。提取亚洲人、黑人或非裔美国人和白人人群的MACE风险比(hr)。随机效应荟萃分析用于获得合并hr和hr比率(rhr),比较人群之间的治疗效果。结果:包括最近的SOUL试验在内的9项试验纳入了8164名亚洲人、4036名黑人或非裔美国人以及62,503名白人受试者。GLP-1RAs降低了亚洲人群的MACE风险(HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.63-0.85; p)结论:GLP-1RAs降低了人群的MACE风险,亚洲人群的相对风险降低更大,黑人或非裔美国人和白人人群的获益大致相似。
{"title":"GLP-1 receptor agonists and cardiovascular outcomes in Asian, Black or African American, and White populations: An updated meta-analysis including the SOUL trial.","authors":"Masashi Hasebe, Chen-Yang Su, Hisashi Kamido, Daisuke Yabe, Satoshi Yoshiji","doi":"10.1111/dom.70458","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the cardiovascular efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in Asian, Black or African American, and White populations, and to assess whether the magnitude of cardiovascular risk reduction differs across these populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed and EMBASE were searched to 11 November 2025 for randomized placebo-controlled GLP-1RA trials in adults with type 2 diabetes or overweight/obesity that reported race-stratified major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke). Hazard ratios (HRs) for MACE were extracted for Asian, Black or African American, and White populations. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to obtain pooled HRs and ratios of HRs (RHRs) comparing treatment effects between populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine trials, including the recent SOUL trial, were included, comprising 8164 Asian, 4036 Black or African American, and 62 503 White participants. GLP-1RAs reduced MACE risk in Asian (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.63-0.85; p < 0.001) and White populations (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.91; p < 0.001). In Black or African American populations, the effect was similar to that in White populations (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.67-1.15; p = 0.34) but did not reach statistical significance. The pooled RHR for Asian versus White populations was 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.98; p = 0.027), indicating a significantly greater risk reduction in Asian populations. The RHR for Asian versus Black or African American populations was 0.81 (95% CI 0.57-1.16; p = 0.25), with point estimates favouring Asian populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1RAs reduced MACE risk across populations, with greater relative risk reduction in Asian populations and broadly similar benefits in Black or African American and White populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146016600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BALLAST study: A multicentre, open-label, randomized-controlled, 52-week clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin in older Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes receiving leucine-enriched amino acid supplementation and physical exercise programme. 碴碴研究:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照、52周的临床试验,目的是在接受富含亮氨酸的氨基酸补充和体育锻炼计划的日本老年2型糖尿病患者中,研究luseoglilozin的有效性和安全性。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70494
Yoshihiro Takahashi, Makoto Hayashi, Takehiro Kato, Yukio Horikawa, Shin Tsunekawa, Hitoshi Kuwata, Yutaka Seino, Ryota Ogata, Kenta Murotani, Daisuke Yabe
{"title":"BALLAST study: A multicentre, open-label, randomized-controlled, 52-week clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin in older Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes receiving leucine-enriched amino acid supplementation and physical exercise programme.","authors":"Yoshihiro Takahashi, Makoto Hayashi, Takehiro Kato, Yukio Horikawa, Shin Tsunekawa, Hitoshi Kuwata, Yutaka Seino, Ryota Ogata, Kenta Murotani, Daisuke Yabe","doi":"10.1111/dom.70494","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dom.70494","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oral indole-3-propionic acid preserves β-cell function and improves glucose homeostasis in diabetic mice via FOXA1-SGPP1-HSPA5 signalling. 口服吲哚-3-丙酸可通过FOXA1-SGPP1-HSPA5信号通路维持糖尿病小鼠β-细胞功能并改善葡萄糖稳态。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70471
Xin Liu, Zixiao Liang, Chunxun Liu, Yifan Ma, Leyao Qi, Xu Zhang, Fangyi Zhu, Mengjie Xiao, Jinjian Pan, Changhao Sun, Huanyu Wu

Aims: Emerging evidence suggests that indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), a gut microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolite, confers metabolic benefits in type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, its direct role in preserving pancreatic β-cell function and the underlying molecular mechanisms remains largely undefined. This study aimed to investigate the role and underlying mechanisms of IPA in preserving β-cell function and alleviating endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress under diabetogenic conditions.

Materials and methods: High-fat diet-fed and db/db mice were treated with IPA via oral gavage. Glucose homeostasis, islet morphology, and insulin secretion were evaluated. In vitro studies in MIN6 cells and isolated islets assessed IPA's effects on ER stress, insulin secretion, and apoptosis. Proteomics, molecular docking, luciferase reporter assays, and gene expression analyses were conducted to identify key molecular targets.

Results: IPA significantly preserved islet architecture and enhanced insulin secretion. Proteomic analysis revealed downregulation of ER stress pathways and upregulation of SGPP1 upon IPA treatment. SGPP1 was essential for IPA-mediated suppression of ER stress and β-cell apoptosis through direct interaction with HSPA5. IPA stabilized and activated the transcription factor FOXA1, which in turn transcriptionally upregulated SGPP1 expression.

Conclusion: IPA protects pancreatic β-cells by activating the FOXA1-SGPP1-HSPA5 signalling pathway, thereby alleviating ER stress and enhancing β-cell survival.

目的:新出现的证据表明,肠道微生物来源的色氨酸代谢物吲哚-3-丙酸(IPA)对2型糖尿病(T2D)具有代谢益处。然而,其在维持胰腺β细胞功能中的直接作用及其潜在的分子机制在很大程度上仍未明确。本研究旨在探讨IPA在糖尿病发病条件下维持β细胞功能和减轻内质网应激中的作用及其机制。材料与方法:采用高脂饲料和db/db小鼠灌胃的方法给予IPA。评估葡萄糖稳态、胰岛形态和胰岛素分泌。在MIN6细胞和离体胰岛的体外研究中,评估了IPA对内质网应激、胰岛素分泌和细胞凋亡的影响。通过蛋白质组学、分子对接、荧光素酶报告分析和基因表达分析来确定关键的分子靶点。结果:IPA能明显保护胰岛结构,促进胰岛素分泌。蛋白质组学分析显示,经IPA处理后,内质网应激途径下调,SGPP1上调。SGPP1通过与HSPA5的直接相互作用,在ipa介导的内质网应激和β细胞凋亡的抑制中起重要作用。IPA稳定并激活转录因子FOXA1,进而上调SGPP1的表达。结论:IPA通过激活FOXA1-SGPP1-HSPA5信号通路保护胰腺β-细胞,从而减轻内质网应激,提高β-细胞存活率。
{"title":"Oral indole-3-propionic acid preserves β-cell function and improves glucose homeostasis in diabetic mice via FOXA1-SGPP1-HSPA5 signalling.","authors":"Xin Liu, Zixiao Liang, Chunxun Liu, Yifan Ma, Leyao Qi, Xu Zhang, Fangyi Zhu, Mengjie Xiao, Jinjian Pan, Changhao Sun, Huanyu Wu","doi":"10.1111/dom.70471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70471","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), a gut microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolite, confers metabolic benefits in type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, its direct role in preserving pancreatic β-cell function and the underlying molecular mechanisms remains largely undefined. This study aimed to investigate the role and underlying mechanisms of IPA in preserving β-cell function and alleviating endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress under diabetogenic conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>High-fat diet-fed and db/db mice were treated with IPA via oral gavage. Glucose homeostasis, islet morphology, and insulin secretion were evaluated. In vitro studies in MIN6 cells and isolated islets assessed IPA's effects on ER stress, insulin secretion, and apoptosis. Proteomics, molecular docking, luciferase reporter assays, and gene expression analyses were conducted to identify key molecular targets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IPA significantly preserved islet architecture and enhanced insulin secretion. Proteomic analysis revealed downregulation of ER stress pathways and upregulation of SGPP1 upon IPA treatment. SGPP1 was essential for IPA-mediated suppression of ER stress and β-cell apoptosis through direct interaction with HSPA5. IPA stabilized and activated the transcription factor FOXA1, which in turn transcriptionally upregulated SGPP1 expression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPA protects pancreatic β-cells by activating the FOXA1-SGPP1-HSPA5 signalling pathway, thereby alleviating ER stress and enhancing β-cell survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New paths to attenuate the burden of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. 减轻1型糖尿病低血糖负担的新途径
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70512
Louis Monnier, David Owens
{"title":"New paths to attenuate the burden of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Louis Monnier, David Owens","doi":"10.1111/dom.70512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70512","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex differences in patterns of chronic kidney disease care in Australian primary care: A retrospective cohort study of a national general practice dataset 澳大利亚初级保健慢性肾脏疾病护理模式的性别差异:一项全国全科医生数据集的回顾性队列研究。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70428
Hannah Wallace MBBS, Luke Buizen MStats, Sunil V. Badve PhD, Jeffrey T. Ha PhD, Daniel Bekele Ketema MPH, Paul Ronksley PhD, Takaya Sasaki PhD, Amanda Siriwardana PhD, Katie Harris PhD, Amanda Henry PhD, Mark Woodward PhD, Sradha S. Kotwal PhD, Min Jun PhD

Aims

Prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) differs between females and males across the disease spectrum. Data on whether management of CKD also varies according to sex are limited. This study aimed to understand sex-related differences in CKD monitoring and cardiovascular risk management in Australian primary care.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective cohort study of adults attending general practices in Australia between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2020 and met diagnostic criteria for CKD. Sex differences in CKD monitoring and management were assessed within 18 months of meeting CKD diagnostic criteria. Core monitoring was defined as ≥1 measurement of all of blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine albumin creatine ratio, lipids and, in patients with diabetes, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Cardiovascular risk management comprised angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) and statin prescriptions, blood pressure target achievement, and lipid control. Adjusted modified Poisson regression determined the relative risk (RR) of outcomes in females versus males, and sex-specific analyses explored associations between patient characteristics and outcomes.

Results

Of 140 774 patients with CKD, 51.4% were female. Females were older (mean age: 75.8 vs. 72.7 years) and had less prevalent cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Females were less likely than males to receive core monitoring in models adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic characteristics (RR [95% CI], 0.96 [0.95–0.98]), ACEi/ARB prescription (0.96 [0.95–0.97]; no difference in statin prescription), blood pressure targets (<140/90 mmHg: 0.96 [0.95–0.97]), and LDL <2 mmol/L (0.82 [0.80–0.84]). Differences persisted with advancing age, higher CKD risk, and co-morbidity subgroups. Sex-specific analyses found similar associations between patient characteristics and CKD care in both females and males.

Conclusions

Females with CKD were less likely to receive CKD monitoring and cardiovascular risk management compared to males. Findings were not explained by differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, with findings persisting in both high-risk subgroups and adjusted models. Further research is required to understand reasons for disparities in care.

目的:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的患病率在整个疾病谱系中在女性和男性之间存在差异。关于慢性肾病的治疗是否也因性别而异的数据有限。本研究旨在了解澳大利亚初级保健中CKD监测和心血管风险管理的性别相关差异。材料和方法:对2011年1月1日至2020年6月30日期间在澳大利亚全科就诊并符合CKD诊断标准的成年人进行回顾性队列研究。在满足CKD诊断标准的18个月内评估CKD监测和管理的性别差异。核心监测定义为所有血压、肾小球滤过率、尿白蛋白肌酸比、血脂以及糖尿病患者血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)的≥1次测量。心血管风险管理包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACEi/ARB)和他汀类药物处方、血压目标的实现和脂质控制。调整后的修正泊松回归确定了女性与男性预后的相对风险(RR),性别特异性分析探讨了患者特征与预后之间的关系。结果:140774例慢性肾病患者中,女性占51.4%。女性年龄较大(平均年龄:75.8岁对72.7岁),心血管疾病和糖尿病患病率较低。在调整了临床和社会人口学特征的模型中,女性接受核心监测的可能性低于男性(RR [95% CI], 0.96[0.95-0.98])、ACEi/ARB处方(0.96[0.95-0.97];他汀类药物处方无差异)、血压指标(结论:女性CKD患者接受CKD监测和心血管风险管理的可能性低于男性)。这些发现不能用社会人口学和临床特征的差异来解释,这些发现在高危亚组和调整后的模型中都存在。需要进一步的研究来了解护理差异的原因。
{"title":"Sex differences in patterns of chronic kidney disease care in Australian primary care: A retrospective cohort study of a national general practice dataset","authors":"Hannah Wallace MBBS,&nbsp;Luke Buizen MStats,&nbsp;Sunil V. Badve PhD,&nbsp;Jeffrey T. Ha PhD,&nbsp;Daniel Bekele Ketema MPH,&nbsp;Paul Ronksley PhD,&nbsp;Takaya Sasaki PhD,&nbsp;Amanda Siriwardana PhD,&nbsp;Katie Harris PhD,&nbsp;Amanda Henry PhD,&nbsp;Mark Woodward PhD,&nbsp;Sradha S. Kotwal PhD,&nbsp;Min Jun PhD","doi":"10.1111/dom.70428","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dom.70428","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aims</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) differs between females and males across the disease spectrum. Data on whether management of CKD also varies according to sex are limited. This study aimed to understand sex-related differences in CKD monitoring and cardiovascular risk management in Australian primary care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Retrospective cohort study of adults attending general practices in Australia between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2020 and met diagnostic criteria for CKD. Sex differences in CKD monitoring and management were assessed within 18 months of meeting CKD diagnostic criteria. Core monitoring was defined as ≥1 measurement of all of blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine albumin creatine ratio, lipids and, in patients with diabetes, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Cardiovascular risk management comprised angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) and statin prescriptions, blood pressure target achievement, and lipid control. Adjusted modified Poisson regression determined the relative risk (RR) of outcomes in females versus males, and sex-specific analyses explored associations between patient characteristics and outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 140 774 patients with CKD, 51.4% were female. Females were older (mean age: 75.8 vs. 72.7 years) and had less prevalent cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Females were less likely than males to receive core monitoring in models adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic characteristics (RR [95% CI], 0.96 [0.95–0.98]), ACEi/ARB prescription (0.96 [0.95–0.97]; no difference in statin prescription), blood pressure targets (&lt;140/90 mmHg: 0.96 [0.95–0.97]), and LDL &lt;2 mmol/L (0.82 [0.80–0.84]). Differences persisted with advancing age, higher CKD risk, and co-morbidity subgroups. Sex-specific analyses found similar associations between patient characteristics and CKD care in both females and males.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Females with CKD were less likely to receive CKD monitoring and cardiovascular risk management compared to males. Findings were not explained by differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, with findings persisting in both high-risk subgroups and adjusted models. Further research is required to understand reasons for disparities in care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"28 3","pages":"2329-2338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146016602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors on liver outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A retrospective cohort study. GLP-1受体激动剂、SGLT2抑制剂和DPP-4抑制剂对代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病肝脏结局的比较效果:一项回顾性队列研究
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/dom.70505
Jyotirmoy Sarker, Ebere Okpara, Bertha De Los Santos, Michael Kim, Kibum Kim

Aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is common in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MASLD carries a substantial risk of progression to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether the metabolic benefits of antidiabetic therapy may alter this progression remains under-investigated. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of cirrhosis or HCC across the commonly used second-line antidiabetic agent classes in patients with coexisting MASLD and T2DM.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using healthcare claims databases in the United States. Patients with MASLD and T2DM initiating one of the three antidiabetic agent classes, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) were included. Propensity score (PS) matching was applied to control for baseline differences between treatment groups. Cumulative incidence of cirrhosis or HCC over 2 years was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method, and risks between treatment groups were compared using Cox regression.

Results: The analysis included three PS-matched cohorts: 4538 GLP-1RA versus DPP-4i pairs, 4754 SGLT2i versus GLP-1RA pairs, and 4333 SGLT2i versus DPP-4i pairs. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no statistically significant differences in the risk of cirrhosis or HCC were observed at 2 years across treatment comparisons (GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4i: hazard ratios [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.58-1.09; GLP-1RA vs. SGLT2i: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55-1.04; SGLT2i vs. DPP-4i: HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58-1.05).

Conclusions: In this large real-world study, we found no clear or consistent differences in liver-related outcomes across GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i users over a 2-year period.

目的:代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中很常见。MASLD有发展为肝硬化或肝细胞癌(HCC)的重大风险。抗糖尿病治疗的代谢益处是否会改变这一进展仍有待研究。我们的目的是评估并发MASLD和T2DM患者常用的二线降糖药类别中肝硬化或HCC的发生率。材料和方法:我们使用美国的医疗索赔数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。MASLD和T2DM患者开始使用三种降糖药之一,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA),钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)。倾向评分(PS)匹配用于控制治疗组之间的基线差异。使用Kaplan-Meier法估计2年内肝硬化或HCC的累积发病率,并使用Cox回归比较治疗组之间的风险。结果:分析包括三个ps匹配队列:4538对GLP-1RA与DPP-4i配对,4754对SGLT2i与GLP-1RA配对,4333对SGLT2i与DPP-4i配对。在意向治疗分析中,两组治疗比较2年后肝硬化或HCC的风险无统计学差异(GLP-1RA与DPP-4i:风险比[HR] 0.80, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.58-1.09; GLP-1RA与SGLT2i: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55-1.04; SGLT2i与DPP-4i: HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58-1.05)。结论:在这项大型现实世界研究中,我们发现GLP-1RA、SGLT2i和DPP-4i使用者在2年期间的肝脏相关结局没有明显或一致的差异。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors on liver outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jyotirmoy Sarker, Ebere Okpara, Bertha De Los Santos, Michael Kim, Kibum Kim","doi":"10.1111/dom.70505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is common in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MASLD carries a substantial risk of progression to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether the metabolic benefits of antidiabetic therapy may alter this progression remains under-investigated. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of cirrhosis or HCC across the commonly used second-line antidiabetic agent classes in patients with coexisting MASLD and T2DM.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using healthcare claims databases in the United States. Patients with MASLD and T2DM initiating one of the three antidiabetic agent classes, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) were included. Propensity score (PS) matching was applied to control for baseline differences between treatment groups. Cumulative incidence of cirrhosis or HCC over 2 years was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method, and risks between treatment groups were compared using Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included three PS-matched cohorts: 4538 GLP-1RA versus DPP-4i pairs, 4754 SGLT2i versus GLP-1RA pairs, and 4333 SGLT2i versus DPP-4i pairs. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no statistically significant differences in the risk of cirrhosis or HCC were observed at 2 years across treatment comparisons (GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4i: hazard ratios [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.58-1.09; GLP-1RA vs. SGLT2i: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55-1.04; SGLT2i vs. DPP-4i: HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58-1.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large real-world study, we found no clear or consistent differences in liver-related outcomes across GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i users over a 2-year period.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1