首页 > 最新文献

Journal of geriatric oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Tolerability of docetaxel in octogenarians with metastatic prostate cancer in the triplet therapy era: A single-center retrospective cohort study 在三联疗法时代,多西他赛对80多岁转移性前列腺癌的耐受性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102844
Kimitsugu Usui, Atsuto Suzuki, Hayato Kubo, Takahiro Matsumoto, Tomohiko Aigase, Takeshi Kishida, Noboru Nakaigawa
{"title":"Tolerability of docetaxel in octogenarians with metastatic prostate cancer in the triplet therapy era: A single-center retrospective cohort study","authors":"Kimitsugu Usui, Atsuto Suzuki, Hayato Kubo, Takahiro Matsumoto, Tomohiko Aigase, Takeshi Kishida, Noboru Nakaigawa","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102844","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102844","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102844"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145837494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of hospital volume on mortality in adult women over 65 with triple-negative breast cancer 医院容量对65岁以上三阴性乳腺癌成年妇女死亡率的影响
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102845
Barnabas T. Obeng-Gyasi , Demond L. Handley , Mohamed I. Elsaid , Eric Schupp , Daniel G. Stover , J.C. Chen , Jesus D. Anampa , Xiaoyi Teng , Samilia Obeng-Gyasi

Introduction

Older adults (≥65 years) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have higher mortality rates than younger patients, due in part to greater comorbidity and lower rates of treatment. However, the impact of hospital volume on survival outcomes in this population remains understudied. This study examined the relationship between hospital volume and survival among older adults (aged 65 years or older) diagnosed with TNBC.

Materials and methods

The National Cancer Database was queried for women ages ≥65 years with stage I–III TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2020. Annual hospital volume was the facility-level average of breast cancer cases treated in the years before the year of diagnosis. Volumes were divided into quartiles, with the lowest quartile (≤136 cases/year) defined as low-volume and the remaining three quartiles combined as high-volume. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were compared according to hospital volume status. Crude and adjusted mortality risk differences and relative risks were estimated using pooled logistic regression models.

Results

The study cohort comprised 37,538 older women with TNBC, of whom 25 % (n = 9388) were treated at low-volume hospitals. Patients treated at low-volume hospitals were slightly older (73 years [IQR: 68 to 79] vs. 72 years [IQR: 68 to 78 years]) and traveled a shorter distance to the hospitals (6.80 miles [IQR: 3.00 to 14.30] vs 8.60 miles [IQR: 4.30 to 18.00]) than those treated at high-volume hospitals (p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, treatment at low-volume hospitals (Low-Value Risk: 0.607, 95 % CI: 0.579 to 0.638) was associated with a 5.5 % increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to treatment at high-volume hospitals (High-Volume Risk: 0.576, 95 % CI: 0.556 to 0.592) (RR: 1.055, 95 % CI: 1.003 to 1.121). Patients treated at low-volume hospitals had a 3.2 % excess adjusted risk of mortality compared to those treated at higher-volume hospitals (RD: 3.2 %, 95 % CI: 0.2 % to 6.9 %).

Discussion

Older adults treated at low-volume hospitals had modestly higher mortality than those at high-volume facilities. Future work should identify mechanisms underlying this relationship and assess whether referral patterns for older adults should consider hospital volume.
老年人(≥65岁)患有三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的死亡率高于年轻患者,部分原因是合并症较多,治疗率较低。然而,医院容量对这一人群生存结果的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究探讨了诊断为三阴癌的老年人(65岁或以上)住院容量与生存率之间的关系。材料和方法在国家癌症数据库中查询了2010年至2020年间诊断为I-III期TNBC的年龄≥65岁的女性。每年的医院数量是诊断前几年治疗的乳腺癌病例的医院平均水平。量被分为四分位数,最低四分位数(≤136例/年)定义为低量,其余三个四分位数合并为高量。根据医院容量状况比较社会人口学、临床和治疗特征。使用混合逻辑回归模型估计粗死亡率和调整死亡率风险差异和相对风险。结果该研究队列包括37,538名TNBC老年妇女,其中25% (n = 9388)在小容量医院接受治疗。在小规模医院接受治疗的患者年龄略大(73岁[IQR: 68至79岁]vs. 72岁[IQR: 68至78岁]),并且到医院的路程较短(6.80英里[IQR: 3.00至14.30]vs 8.60英里[IQR: 4.30至18.00]),比在大规模医院接受治疗的患者(p < 0.001)。在调整分析中,与在大医院治疗相比,在小医院治疗(低值风险:0.607,95% CI: 0.579至0.638)与全因死亡率增加5.5%相关(高值风险:0.576,95% CI: 0.556至0.592)(RR: 1.055, 95% CI: 1.003至1.121)。与在大医院治疗的患者相比,在小医院治疗的患者调整后死亡率风险高出3.2% (RD: 3.2%, 95% CI: 0.2%至6.9%)。在小容量医院治疗的老年人的死亡率略高于在大容量医院治疗的老年人。未来的工作应该确定这种关系的潜在机制,并评估老年人的转诊模式是否应该考虑医院数量。
{"title":"Impact of hospital volume on mortality in adult women over 65 with triple-negative breast cancer","authors":"Barnabas T. Obeng-Gyasi ,&nbsp;Demond L. Handley ,&nbsp;Mohamed I. Elsaid ,&nbsp;Eric Schupp ,&nbsp;Daniel G. Stover ,&nbsp;J.C. Chen ,&nbsp;Jesus D. Anampa ,&nbsp;Xiaoyi Teng ,&nbsp;Samilia Obeng-Gyasi","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102845","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102845","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Older adults (≥65 years) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have higher mortality rates than younger patients, due in part to greater comorbidity and lower rates of treatment. However, the impact of hospital volume on survival outcomes in this population remains understudied. This study examined the relationship between hospital volume and survival among older adults (aged 65 years or older) diagnosed with TNBC.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The National Cancer Database was queried for women ages ≥65 years with stage I–III TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2020. Annual hospital volume was the facility-level average of breast cancer cases treated in the years before the year of diagnosis. Volumes were divided into quartiles, with the lowest quartile (≤136 cases/year) defined as low-volume and the remaining three quartiles combined as high-volume. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were compared according to hospital volume status. Crude and adjusted mortality risk differences and relative risks were estimated using pooled logistic regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study cohort comprised 37,538 older women with TNBC, of whom 25 % (<em>n</em> = 9388) were treated at low-volume hospitals. Patients treated at low-volume hospitals were slightly older (73 years [IQR: 68 to 79] vs. 72 years [IQR: 68 to 78 years]) and traveled a shorter distance to the hospitals (6.80 miles [IQR: 3.00 to 14.30] vs 8.60 miles [IQR: 4.30 to 18.00]) than those treated at high-volume hospitals (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). On adjusted analysis, treatment at low-volume hospitals (Low-Value Risk: 0.607, 95 % CI: 0.579 to 0.638) was associated with a 5.5 % increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to treatment at high-volume hospitals (High-Volume Risk: 0.576, 95 % CI: 0.556 to 0.592) (RR: 1.055, 95 % CI: 1.003 to 1.121). Patients treated at low-volume hospitals had a 3.2 % excess adjusted risk of mortality compared to those treated at higher-volume hospitals (RD: 3.2 %, 95 % CI: 0.2 % to 6.9 %).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Older adults treated at low-volume hospitals had modestly higher mortality than those at high-volume facilities. Future work should identify mechanisms underlying this relationship and assess whether referral patterns for older adults should consider hospital volume.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145788162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality cancer care for older adults from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: Perspectives from the Cancer and Aging Research Group Junior Board 来自不同文化和语言背景的老年人的高质量癌症护理:来自癌症和老龄化研究小组初级委员会的观点。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102853
Surbhi Singhal , Maya Abdallah , Tanyanika Phillips , Nicole A. Arrato , Mukul Roy , Samantha Werts-Pelter , Katherine Ramos , Chad Yixian Han
{"title":"Quality cancer care for older adults from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: Perspectives from the Cancer and Aging Research Group Junior Board","authors":"Surbhi Singhal ,&nbsp;Maya Abdallah ,&nbsp;Tanyanika Phillips ,&nbsp;Nicole A. Arrato ,&nbsp;Mukul Roy ,&nbsp;Samantha Werts-Pelter ,&nbsp;Katherine Ramos ,&nbsp;Chad Yixian Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102853","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102853","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From frailty to function: Monitoring-based isometric training in complex geriatric oncology 从衰弱到功能:在复杂的老年肿瘤学中基于监测的等长训练
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102869
B. López de San Vicente Hernández , M. Nuño Escolástico , R. Gomez López , E. Olloquiegui Aristegui , G. Moreno Lekue , J. Ciriza Ereño , P. Martinez del Prado
{"title":"From frailty to function: Monitoring-based isometric training in complex geriatric oncology","authors":"B. López de San Vicente Hernández ,&nbsp;M. Nuño Escolástico ,&nbsp;R. Gomez López ,&nbsp;E. Olloquiegui Aristegui ,&nbsp;G. Moreno Lekue ,&nbsp;J. Ciriza Ereño ,&nbsp;P. Martinez del Prado","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102869","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102869","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147448722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deciding on the decision-maker in older adults with cancer: Patient autonomy, physician paternalism, and caregiver support 在老年癌症患者中决定决策者:患者自主、医生家长式作风和照顾者支持。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102930
Clark DuMontier
{"title":"Deciding on the decision-maker in older adults with cancer: Patient autonomy, physician paternalism, and caregiver support","authors":"Clark DuMontier","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102930","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102930","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147355378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do we need geriatricians in geriatric oncology? A SIOG geriatricians position statement 我们需要老年肿瘤学专家吗?SIOG老年病专家的立场声明
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102831
Carolina Gómez-Moreno , Chiara Russo , Armida Parala-Metz , Bérengère Beauplet , Anupa Pillai , Anand Kumar , Domenico Fusco , Suzanne Festen , Siri Rostoft
{"title":"Do we need geriatricians in geriatric oncology? A SIOG geriatricians position statement","authors":"Carolina Gómez-Moreno ,&nbsp;Chiara Russo ,&nbsp;Armida Parala-Metz ,&nbsp;Bérengère Beauplet ,&nbsp;Anupa Pillai ,&nbsp;Anand Kumar ,&nbsp;Domenico Fusco ,&nbsp;Suzanne Festen ,&nbsp;Siri Rostoft","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102831","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102831","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102831"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145735291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of a 12-week multicomponent exercise programme on physical function in older adults with cancer: Study protocol for the ONKO-FRAIL randomised controlled trial 为期12周的多组分运动计划对老年癌症患者身体功能的影响:onko -脆弱随机对照试验的研究方案
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818
Julia García-García , Ana Rodriguez-Larrad , Maren Martinez de Rituerto Zeberio , Jenifer Gómez Mediavilla , Borja López-San Vicente , Nuria Torrego Artola , Izaskun Zeberio Etxetxipia , Irati Garmendia , Ainhoa Alberro , David Otaegui , Francisco Borrego Rabasco , María M. Caffarel , Kalliopi Vrotsou , Jon Irazusta , Haritz Arrieta , Mireia Pelaez , Jon Belloso , Laura Basterretxea

Introduction

Cancer in older adults is often associated with functional limitations, geriatric syndromes, poor self-rated health, vulnerability, and frailty, and these conditions might worsen treatment-related side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with cancer during and after treatment have documented the beneficial effects of exercise to counteract certain side effects; however, little is known about the role of exercise during cancer treatment in older adults.

Materials and Methods

This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in which 200 participants will be allocated to a control group or an intervention group (the sample size has been calculated to detect a clinical difference of 1 point in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, assuming an α error of 0.05, a β error of 0.20, and a 10 % loss rate). Patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with any type of solid cancer and candidates for systemic treatment are eligible. Subjects in the intervention group are invited to participate in a 12-week supervised multicomponent exercise programme in addition to receiving usual care. Study assessments are conducted at baseline and three months. The primary outcome measure is physical function as assessed by the SPPB. Secondary outcome measures include comprehensive geriatric assessment scores (including social situation, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive function, depression, nutritional status, polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes, pain, and emotional distress), anthropometric characteristics, frailty status, physical fitness, physical activity, cognitive function, quality of life, fatigue, and nutritional status. Study assessments also include analysis of inflammatory, endocrine, and nutritional mediators in serum and plasma as potential frailty biomarkers at mRNA and protein levels and multiparametric flow cytometric analysis to measure immunosenescence markers on T and NK cells.

Discussion

This study seeks to extend our knowledge on exercise interventions during systemic anticancer treatment in patients over 70 years of age. Results from this research will guide the management of older adults during systemic treatment in hospitals seeking to enhance the standard of care.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05131113, November 11, 2021.
老年人的癌症通常与功能限制、老年综合征、自我评估健康状况不佳、易受伤害和虚弱有关,这些情况可能会加重治疗相关的副作用。最近针对癌症患者治疗期间和治疗后的指导方针记录了运动对抵消某些副作用的有益影响;然而,人们对运动在老年人癌症治疗中的作用知之甚少。材料和方法这是一项多中心随机对照试验,其中200名参与者将被分配到对照组或干预组(计算样本量以检测短体能性能电池(SPPB)评分1分的临床差异,假设α误差为0.05,β误差为0.20,损失率为10%)。年龄≥70岁,诊断为任何类型的实体癌,适合接受全身治疗的患者。干预组的受试者除了接受常规护理外,还被邀请参加为期12周的有监督的多成分锻炼计划。研究评估在基线和三个月时进行。主要指标是SPPB评估的身体功能。次要结局指标包括老年综合评估得分(包括社会状况、日常生活的基本和辅助活动、认知功能、抑郁、营养状况、多种药物、老年综合征、疼痛和情绪困扰)、人体测量特征、虚弱状态、身体健康、身体活动、认知功能、生活质量、疲劳和营养状况。研究评估还包括分析血清和血浆中的炎症、内分泌和营养介质作为mRNA和蛋白质水平的潜在脆弱生物标志物,以及多参数流式细胞术分析来测量T和NK细胞的免疫衰老标志物。本研究旨在扩展我们在70岁以上患者全身抗癌治疗中运动干预的知识。本研究的结果将指导医院在系统治疗期间老年人的管理,以提高护理标准。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov标识符:NCT05131113, 2021年11月11日。
{"title":"Effects of a 12-week multicomponent exercise programme on physical function in older adults with cancer: Study protocol for the ONKO-FRAIL randomised controlled trial","authors":"Julia García-García ,&nbsp;Ana Rodriguez-Larrad ,&nbsp;Maren Martinez de Rituerto Zeberio ,&nbsp;Jenifer Gómez Mediavilla ,&nbsp;Borja López-San Vicente ,&nbsp;Nuria Torrego Artola ,&nbsp;Izaskun Zeberio Etxetxipia ,&nbsp;Irati Garmendia ,&nbsp;Ainhoa Alberro ,&nbsp;David Otaegui ,&nbsp;Francisco Borrego Rabasco ,&nbsp;María M. Caffarel ,&nbsp;Kalliopi Vrotsou ,&nbsp;Jon Irazusta ,&nbsp;Haritz Arrieta ,&nbsp;Mireia Pelaez ,&nbsp;Jon Belloso ,&nbsp;Laura Basterretxea","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cancer in older adults is often associated with functional limitations, geriatric syndromes, poor self-rated health, vulnerability, and frailty, and these conditions might worsen treatment-related side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with cancer during and after treatment have documented the beneficial effects of exercise to counteract certain side effects; however, little is known about the role of exercise during cancer treatment in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in which 200 participants will be allocated to a control group or an intervention group (the sample size has been calculated to detect a clinical difference of 1 point in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, assuming an α error of 0.05, a β error of 0.20, and a 10 % loss rate). Patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with any type of solid cancer and candidates for systemic treatment are eligible. Subjects in the intervention group are invited to participate in a 12-week supervised multicomponent exercise programme in addition to receiving usual care. Study assessments are conducted at baseline and three months. The primary outcome measure is physical function as assessed by the SPPB. Secondary outcome measures include comprehensive geriatric assessment scores (including social situation, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive function, depression, nutritional status, polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes, pain, and emotional distress), anthropometric characteristics, frailty status, physical fitness, physical activity, cognitive function, quality of life, fatigue, and nutritional status. Study assessments also include analysis of inflammatory, endocrine, and nutritional mediators in serum and plasma as potential frailty biomarkers at mRNA and protein levels and multiparametric flow cytometric analysis to measure immunosenescence markers on T and NK cells.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study seeks to extend our knowledge on exercise interventions during systemic anticancer treatment in patients over 70 years of age. Results from this research will guide the management of older adults during systemic treatment in hospitals seeking to enhance the standard of care.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: <span><span>NCT05131113</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, November 11, 2021.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102818"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145665429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-led management approaches in older adults with advanced cancer: Implications for supportive and palliative oncology 老年晚期癌症患者主导的管理方法:对支持性和姑息性肿瘤的影响。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102898
Ana Carolina Fernandes , Louis John Koizia , Benjamin Howell Lole Harris
{"title":"Patient-led management approaches in older adults with advanced cancer: Implications for supportive and palliative oncology","authors":"Ana Carolina Fernandes ,&nbsp;Louis John Koizia ,&nbsp;Benjamin Howell Lole Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102898","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102898","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical assessment of geriatric oncology guidelines based on the AGREE II tool 基于AGREE II工具的老年肿瘤学指南的关键评估。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102833
Gayathri Nair , Cailyn H. Livingstone , Jonathon W. Vundum , Mathew George

Introduction

The world's population is aging rapidly and older adults carry a disproportionate cancer burden. Despite this, older patients remain underrepresented in clinical research. As a result, the evidence base informing guideline development remains limited. Existing guidelines vary in methodological quality and applicability. We aimed to evaluate the quality and clinical applicability of established geriatric oncology guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation, version II (AGREE II) instrument.

Materials and methods

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, in addition to official oncology society websites (ASCO, NCCN, SoFOG, Japanese Geriatric Oncology Group). The search covered publications from January 2000 to May 2025 and was limited to English and to guidelines that specifically address cancer care in older adults and provide documented methodologies. Two reviewers independently appraised each guideline using the AGREE II tool across six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence.

Results

A total of 807 records were identified,out of which only 6 guidelines met the eligibility criteria. The AGREE II assessment revealed significant variability in guideline quality. Most guidelines scored high in clarity of presentation and scope and purpose, but showed moderate to low scores in stakeholder involvement and applicability. The recent ASCO guidelines demonstrated higher overall methodological rigor, whereas others lacked comprehensive documentation of evidence synthesis and user applicability.

Discussion

While several geriatric oncology guidelines demonstrate acceptable quality, inconsistencies remain, particularly in stakeholder engagement and practical implementation. Enhanced methodological rigor and inclusive development processes are essential for future guideline improvement and effective translation into geriatric oncology practice.
导言:世界人口正在迅速老龄化,老年人承担着不成比例的癌症负担。尽管如此,老年患者在临床研究中的代表性仍然不足。因此,指导方针制定的证据基础仍然有限。现有指南在方法质量和适用性方面各不相同。我们的目的是使用指南研究和评估评估II版(AGREE II)工具评估已建立的老年肿瘤学指南的质量和临床适用性。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase, Cochrane图书馆,以及官方肿瘤学会网站(ASCO, NCCN, SoFOG, Japanese Geriatric oncology Group)。检索涵盖了2000年1月至2025年5月的出版物,仅限于英文和专门针对老年人癌症护理的指南,并提供记录的方法。两名审稿人使用AGREE II工具在六个领域独立评估每个指南:范围和目的、涉众参与、开发的严谨性、表达的清晰度、适用性和编辑独立性。结果:共识别807条记录,其中只有6条指南符合入选标准。AGREE II评估显示指南质量存在显著差异。大多数指南在表述的清晰度、范围和目的方面得分很高,但在涉众参与和适用性方面得分中等到较低。最近的ASCO指南显示出更高的总体方法严谨性,而其他指南缺乏证据综合和用户适用性的全面文件。讨论:虽然一些老年肿瘤学指南表现出可接受的质量,但仍然存在不一致性,特别是在利益相关者参与和实际实施方面。增强方法的严谨性和包容性的发展过程对于未来指南的改进和有效地转化为老年肿瘤学实践至关重要。
{"title":"Critical assessment of geriatric oncology guidelines based on the AGREE II tool","authors":"Gayathri Nair ,&nbsp;Cailyn H. Livingstone ,&nbsp;Jonathon W. Vundum ,&nbsp;Mathew George","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102833","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102833","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The world's population is aging rapidly and older adults carry a disproportionate cancer burden. Despite this, older patients remain underrepresented in clinical research. As a result, the evidence base informing guideline development remains limited. Existing guidelines vary in methodological quality and applicability. We aimed to evaluate the quality and clinical applicability of established geriatric oncology guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation, version II (AGREE II) instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, in addition to official oncology society websites (ASCO, NCCN, SoFOG, Japanese Geriatric Oncology Group). The search covered publications from January 2000 to May 2025 and was limited to English and to guidelines that specifically address cancer care in older adults and provide documented methodologies. Two reviewers independently appraised each guideline using the AGREE II tool across six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 807 records were identified,out of which only 6 guidelines met the eligibility criteria. The AGREE II assessment revealed significant variability in guideline quality. Most guidelines scored high in clarity of presentation and scope and purpose, but showed moderate to low scores in stakeholder involvement and applicability. The recent ASCO guidelines demonstrated higher overall methodological rigor, whereas others lacked comprehensive documentation of evidence synthesis and user applicability.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>While several geriatric oncology guidelines demonstrate acceptable quality, inconsistencies remain, particularly in stakeholder engagement and practical implementation. Enhanced methodological rigor and inclusive development processes are essential for future guideline improvement and effective translation into geriatric oncology practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Graft versus host disease treatment and prevention in older adults: A single-database review 老年人移植物抗宿主病的治疗和预防:单数据库回顾。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102848
William Ciurylo , Anahid Hamparsumian , Sarah Wall , Gabrielle Meyers

Introduction

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is increasingly used to treat hematological conditions in patients 60 years and older. Graft vs host disease (GVHD), a complication of SCT, is a major cause of morbidity, nonrelapse mortality, and interference with quality of life (QOL). Concern that older adults are at higher risk for developing GVHD has limited the use of SCT in this population. Older adults are also at higher risk for adverse events from the mainstay treatment of GVHD: corticosteroids. There is no standard of care for the management of GVHD in older adults, which may limit older adults' access to SCT. We aimed to review the literature on non-corticosteroid immune modulating agents used to prevent and treat GVHD for outcomes data specific to older adults.

Materials and methods

We performed a scoping review using Pubmed, identifying 31 studies comparing immunosuppressive prophylaxis and treatment modalities for GVHD (acute, chronic, mixed, and corticosteroid refractory) within a 10-year span (February 13, 2013 - February 13, 2023). Articles exploring cutaneous GVHD only or corticosteroid treatments were excluded. Articles were reviewed for inclusion of patients 65+ years, response rate, mortality rate, adverse events, degree of corticosteroid sparing, and QOL scores before and after treatment.

Results

Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria, for a total of 2534 patients with GVHD. Two articles did not include patients 65+, ten did not specify the number of patients 65+, and five articles indicated the number of patients 65+ (n = 160). No articles specified response rate, mortality rate, or adverse events in patients 65+. Twelve articles indicated degree of corticosteroid sparing. Six articles included QOL scores, but did not assess impact of treatment on QOL scores or specify QOL scores in patients 65+. Overall, 3.5% of study participants were identified as aged 65+ and 4.7% aged 60 + .

Discussion

There is a lack of relevant outcomes data to guide best practice in the prevention and treatment of GVHD in older adults Understanding the risk of GVHD in older adults and identifying effective prophylactic and treatment strategies for GVHD in older adults may result in more older adults having access to SCT.
造血干细胞移植(SCT)越来越多地用于治疗60岁及以上患者的血液病。移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)是SCT的一种并发症,是发病率、非复发死亡率和生活质量(QOL)干扰的主要原因。考虑到老年人发生GVHD的风险较高,限制了SCT在这一人群中的应用。老年人在GVHD的主要治疗——皮质类固醇——中发生不良事件的风险也更高。老年人GVHD的治疗没有标准,这可能限制了老年人接受SCT的机会。我们的目的是回顾用于预防和治疗GVHD的非皮质类固醇免疫调节剂的文献,以获得老年人特异性的结局数据。材料和方法:我们使用Pubmed进行了一项范围审查,确定了31项研究,比较了10年间(2013年2月13日至2023年2月13日)GVHD(急性、慢性、混合和皮质类固醇难治性)的免疫抑制预防和治疗方式。仅探讨皮肤GVHD或皮质类固醇治疗的文章被排除在外。对纳入65岁以上患者、缓解率、死亡率、不良事件、皮质类固醇保留程度和治疗前后的生活质量评分进行综述。结果:17篇文章符合纳入标准,共纳入2534例GVHD患者。2篇文章没有纳入65岁以上的患者,10篇没有明确65岁以上的患者人数,5篇文章指出了65岁以上的患者人数(n = 160)。没有文章规定65岁以上患者的缓解率、死亡率或不良事件。12篇文章指出了皮质类固醇的节约程度。6篇文章纳入了生活质量评分,但没有评估治疗对生活质量评分的影响,也没有指定65岁以上患者的生活质量评分。总体而言,3.5%的研究参与者年龄在65岁以上,4.7%的参与者年龄在60岁以上。讨论:缺乏相关的结局数据来指导老年人GVHD的预防和治疗的最佳实践,了解老年人GVHD的风险,确定老年人GVHD的有效预防和治疗策略,可能会使更多的老年人获得SCT。
{"title":"Graft versus host disease treatment and prevention in older adults: A single-database review","authors":"William Ciurylo ,&nbsp;Anahid Hamparsumian ,&nbsp;Sarah Wall ,&nbsp;Gabrielle Meyers","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102848","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102848","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is increasingly used to treat hematological conditions in patients 60 years and older. Graft vs host disease (GVHD), a complication of SCT, is a major cause of morbidity, nonrelapse mortality, and interference with quality of life (QOL). Concern that older adults are at higher risk for developing GVHD has limited the use of SCT in this population. Older adults are also at higher risk for adverse events from the mainstay treatment of GVHD: corticosteroids. There is no standard of care for the management of GVHD in older adults, which may limit older adults' access to SCT. We aimed to review the literature on non-corticosteroid immune modulating agents used to prevent and treat GVHD for outcomes data specific to older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We performed a scoping review using Pubmed, identifying 31 studies comparing immunosuppressive prophylaxis and treatment modalities for GVHD (acute, chronic, mixed, and corticosteroid refractory) within a 10-year span (February 13, 2013 - February 13, 2023). Articles exploring cutaneous GVHD only or corticosteroid treatments were excluded. Articles were reviewed for inclusion of patients 65+ years, response rate, mortality rate, adverse events, degree of corticosteroid sparing, and QOL scores before and after treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria, for a total of 2534 patients with GVHD. Two articles did not include patients 65+, ten did not specify the number of patients 65+, and five articles indicated the number of patients 65+ (<em>n</em> = 160). No articles specified response rate, mortality rate, or adverse events in patients 65+. Twelve articles indicated degree of corticosteroid sparing. Six articles included QOL scores, but did not assess impact of treatment on QOL scores or specify QOL scores in patients 65+. Overall, 3.5% of study participants were identified as aged 65+ and 4.7% aged 60 + .</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There is a lack of relevant outcomes data to guide best practice in the prevention and treatment of GVHD in older adults Understanding the risk of GVHD in older adults and identifying effective prophylactic and treatment strategies for GVHD in older adults may result in more older adults having access to SCT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1