首页 > 最新文献

Journal of geriatric oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Development of a new model for prediction of relevant treatment related adverse events in older individuals with gastrointestinal cancers 开发一种预测老年胃肠道癌症患者相关治疗相关不良事件的新模型
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102817
Vallish Shenoy , Sadhana Kannan , Vanita Noronha , Kumar Prabhash , Vikas Ostwal , Prabhat Bhargava , Anupa Pillai , K. Shamseeya , Ankush Shetake , Ratan Dhekale , Ankita Chitre , Vikram Gota , Sarika Mahajan , Anuradha Daptardar , Lekhika Sonkusare , Jayita Deodhar , Nabila Ansari , Manjusha Vagal , Purabi Mahajan , Manjunath Nookala , Anant Ramaswamy

Introduction

Limited tools exist to specifically predict the risk of chemotherapy toxicity and related events in older individuals with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

Materials and Methods

We evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with GI cancers who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment comprising demographic, cancer variables, and geriatric domains (function, comorbidities, nutritional status, medications, cognition, psychological status, and social support). A Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score was calculated in all patients. The occurrence of grade 3 to 5 adverse events, emergent hospitalizations, and sudden death without identifiable adverse events were defined as treatment related adverse events (TRAE) to form the new predictive model. Based on initial univariate analysis of factors predicting for TRAE and then multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed to predict the probability TRAEs. The total score derived from the nomogram was categorized into low, moderate, and high-risk groups based on a recursive partitioning algorithm.

Results

In total, 701 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 60 to 88 years) with predominantly stage IV cancers (58 %) were analysed. The distribution of GI cancers was gastric and esophageal cancers (n = 349, 50 %), hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers (n = 241, 34 %), and colorectal cancers (n = 84, 12 %). TRAE occurred in 53 % of the patients. A predictive model for TRAE was developed using the Mobility-Tiredness (Mob-T) Scale, hearing, cancer stage, site of primary, and chemotherapy dosing (standard or reduced). A predictive score in which the median risk score was 22 (range, 0 to 40) and risk stratification identified older adults at low risk (0 to 13 points; 17 %), intermediate risk (14 to 21 points; 40 %), or high risk (>22 points; 71 %) of chemotherapy toxicity (P < 0.001). The new model outperformed the CARG score based on ROC analysis (0.75 vs 0.59, p < 0.001).

Discussion

A new and simpler risk score predicts for chemotherapy related adverse events in older patients with GI cancers and seems to be more accurate than the CARG score. The score requires validation in prospective studies.
目前存在有限的工具来专门预测老年胃肠道(GI)癌症患者化疗毒性和相关事件的风险。材料和方法我们对年龄≥60岁的胃肠道癌症患者进行了全面的老年评估,包括人口统计学、癌症变量和老年领域(功能、合并症、营养状况、药物、认知、心理状态和社会支持)。计算所有患者的癌症和衰老研究组(CARG)评分。将发生3 ~ 5级不良事件、紧急住院和无可识别不良事件的猝死定义为治疗相关不良事件(TRAE),形成新的预测模型。在对TRAE的预测因素进行单因素分析和多因素分析的基础上,建立了预测TRAE概率的模态图。基于递归划分算法,从nomogram得出的总分分为低、中、高风险三组。结果共分析701例患者,中位年龄67岁(60 ~ 88岁),主要为IV期癌症(58%)。胃肠道肿瘤分布为胃癌和食管癌(n = 349,50 %)、肝胆癌和胰腺癌(n = 241,34 %)和结直肠癌(n = 84,12 %)。53%的患者发生TRAE。利用活动-疲劳(mobt)量表、听力、癌症分期、原发部位和化疗剂量(标准或减少)建立TRAE预测模型。中位风险评分为22分(范围0 ~ 40分)的预测评分和风险分层将老年人确定为低风险(0 ~ 13分;17%)、中风险(14 ~ 21分;40%)或高风险(22分;71%)的化疗毒性(P < 0.001)。新模型优于基于ROC分析的CARG评分(0.75 vs 0.59, p < 0.001)。一种新的、更简单的风险评分预测老年胃肠道肿瘤患者化疗相关不良事件,似乎比CARG评分更准确。该分数需要在前瞻性研究中验证。
{"title":"Development of a new model for prediction of relevant treatment related adverse events in older individuals with gastrointestinal cancers","authors":"Vallish Shenoy ,&nbsp;Sadhana Kannan ,&nbsp;Vanita Noronha ,&nbsp;Kumar Prabhash ,&nbsp;Vikas Ostwal ,&nbsp;Prabhat Bhargava ,&nbsp;Anupa Pillai ,&nbsp;K. Shamseeya ,&nbsp;Ankush Shetake ,&nbsp;Ratan Dhekale ,&nbsp;Ankita Chitre ,&nbsp;Vikram Gota ,&nbsp;Sarika Mahajan ,&nbsp;Anuradha Daptardar ,&nbsp;Lekhika Sonkusare ,&nbsp;Jayita Deodhar ,&nbsp;Nabila Ansari ,&nbsp;Manjusha Vagal ,&nbsp;Purabi Mahajan ,&nbsp;Manjunath Nookala ,&nbsp;Anant Ramaswamy","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102817","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102817","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Limited tools exist to specifically predict the risk of chemotherapy toxicity and related events in older individuals with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with GI cancers who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment comprising demographic, cancer variables, and geriatric domains (function, comorbidities, nutritional status, medications, cognition, psychological status, and social support). A Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score was calculated in all patients. The occurrence of grade 3 to 5 adverse events, emergent hospitalizations, and sudden death without identifiable adverse events were defined as treatment related adverse events (TRAE) to form the new predictive model. Based on initial univariate analysis of factors predicting for TRAE and then multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed to predict the probability TRAEs. The total score derived from the nomogram was categorized into low, moderate, and high-risk groups based on a recursive partitioning algorithm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 701 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 60 to 88 years) with predominantly stage IV cancers (58 %) were analysed. The distribution of GI cancers was gastric and esophageal cancers (<em>n</em> = 349, 50 %), hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers (<em>n</em> = 241, 34 %), and colorectal cancers (<em>n</em> = 84, 12 %). TRAE occurred in 53 % of the patients. A predictive model for TRAE was developed using the Mobility-Tiredness (Mob-T) Scale, hearing, cancer stage, site of primary, and chemotherapy dosing (standard or reduced). A predictive score in which the median risk score was 22 (range, 0 to 40) and risk stratification identified older adults at low risk (0 to 13 points; 17 %), intermediate risk (14 to 21 points; 40 %), or high risk (&gt;22 points; 71 %) of chemotherapy toxicity (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The new model outperformed the CARG score based on ROC analysis (0.75 vs 0.59, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>A new and simpler risk score predicts for chemotherapy related adverse events in older patients with GI cancers and seems to be more accurate than the CARG score. The score requires validation in prospective studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145692903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of a 12-week multicomponent exercise programme on physical function in older adults with cancer: Study protocol for the ONKO-FRAIL randomised controlled trial 为期12周的多组分运动计划对老年癌症患者身体功能的影响:onko -脆弱随机对照试验的研究方案
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818
Julia García-García , Ana Rodriguez-Larrad , Maren Martinez de Rituerto Zeberio , Jenifer Gómez Mediavilla , Borja López-San Vicente , Nuria Torrego Artola , Izaskun Zeberio Etxetxipia , Irati Garmendia , Ainhoa Alberro , David Otaegui , Francisco Borrego Rabasco , María M. Caffarel , Kalliopi Vrotsou , Jon Irazusta , Haritz Arrieta , Mireia Pelaez , Jon Belloso , Laura Basterretxea

Introduction

Cancer in older adults is often associated with functional limitations, geriatric syndromes, poor self-rated health, vulnerability, and frailty, and these conditions might worsen treatment-related side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with cancer during and after treatment have documented the beneficial effects of exercise to counteract certain side effects; however, little is known about the role of exercise during cancer treatment in older adults.

Materials and Methods

This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in which 200 participants will be allocated to a control group or an intervention group (the sample size has been calculated to detect a clinical difference of 1 point in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, assuming an α error of 0.05, a β error of 0.20, and a 10 % loss rate). Patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with any type of solid cancer and candidates for systemic treatment are eligible. Subjects in the intervention group are invited to participate in a 12-week supervised multicomponent exercise programme in addition to receiving usual care. Study assessments are conducted at baseline and three months. The primary outcome measure is physical function as assessed by the SPPB. Secondary outcome measures include comprehensive geriatric assessment scores (including social situation, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive function, depression, nutritional status, polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes, pain, and emotional distress), anthropometric characteristics, frailty status, physical fitness, physical activity, cognitive function, quality of life, fatigue, and nutritional status. Study assessments also include analysis of inflammatory, endocrine, and nutritional mediators in serum and plasma as potential frailty biomarkers at mRNA and protein levels and multiparametric flow cytometric analysis to measure immunosenescence markers on T and NK cells.

Discussion

This study seeks to extend our knowledge on exercise interventions during systemic anticancer treatment in patients over 70 years of age. Results from this research will guide the management of older adults during systemic treatment in hospitals seeking to enhance the standard of care.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05131113, November 11, 2021.
老年人的癌症通常与功能限制、老年综合征、自我评估健康状况不佳、易受伤害和虚弱有关,这些情况可能会加重治疗相关的副作用。最近针对癌症患者治疗期间和治疗后的指导方针记录了运动对抵消某些副作用的有益影响;然而,人们对运动在老年人癌症治疗中的作用知之甚少。材料和方法这是一项多中心随机对照试验,其中200名参与者将被分配到对照组或干预组(计算样本量以检测短体能性能电池(SPPB)评分1分的临床差异,假设α误差为0.05,β误差为0.20,损失率为10%)。年龄≥70岁,诊断为任何类型的实体癌,适合接受全身治疗的患者。干预组的受试者除了接受常规护理外,还被邀请参加为期12周的有监督的多成分锻炼计划。研究评估在基线和三个月时进行。主要指标是SPPB评估的身体功能。次要结局指标包括老年综合评估得分(包括社会状况、日常生活的基本和辅助活动、认知功能、抑郁、营养状况、多种药物、老年综合征、疼痛和情绪困扰)、人体测量特征、虚弱状态、身体健康、身体活动、认知功能、生活质量、疲劳和营养状况。研究评估还包括分析血清和血浆中的炎症、内分泌和营养介质作为mRNA和蛋白质水平的潜在脆弱生物标志物,以及多参数流式细胞术分析来测量T和NK细胞的免疫衰老标志物。本研究旨在扩展我们在70岁以上患者全身抗癌治疗中运动干预的知识。本研究的结果将指导医院在系统治疗期间老年人的管理,以提高护理标准。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov标识符:NCT05131113, 2021年11月11日。
{"title":"Effects of a 12-week multicomponent exercise programme on physical function in older adults with cancer: Study protocol for the ONKO-FRAIL randomised controlled trial","authors":"Julia García-García ,&nbsp;Ana Rodriguez-Larrad ,&nbsp;Maren Martinez de Rituerto Zeberio ,&nbsp;Jenifer Gómez Mediavilla ,&nbsp;Borja López-San Vicente ,&nbsp;Nuria Torrego Artola ,&nbsp;Izaskun Zeberio Etxetxipia ,&nbsp;Irati Garmendia ,&nbsp;Ainhoa Alberro ,&nbsp;David Otaegui ,&nbsp;Francisco Borrego Rabasco ,&nbsp;María M. Caffarel ,&nbsp;Kalliopi Vrotsou ,&nbsp;Jon Irazusta ,&nbsp;Haritz Arrieta ,&nbsp;Mireia Pelaez ,&nbsp;Jon Belloso ,&nbsp;Laura Basterretxea","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cancer in older adults is often associated with functional limitations, geriatric syndromes, poor self-rated health, vulnerability, and frailty, and these conditions might worsen treatment-related side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with cancer during and after treatment have documented the beneficial effects of exercise to counteract certain side effects; however, little is known about the role of exercise during cancer treatment in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in which 200 participants will be allocated to a control group or an intervention group (the sample size has been calculated to detect a clinical difference of 1 point in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, assuming an α error of 0.05, a β error of 0.20, and a 10 % loss rate). Patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with any type of solid cancer and candidates for systemic treatment are eligible. Subjects in the intervention group are invited to participate in a 12-week supervised multicomponent exercise programme in addition to receiving usual care. Study assessments are conducted at baseline and three months. The primary outcome measure is physical function as assessed by the SPPB. Secondary outcome measures include comprehensive geriatric assessment scores (including social situation, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive function, depression, nutritional status, polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes, pain, and emotional distress), anthropometric characteristics, frailty status, physical fitness, physical activity, cognitive function, quality of life, fatigue, and nutritional status. Study assessments also include analysis of inflammatory, endocrine, and nutritional mediators in serum and plasma as potential frailty biomarkers at mRNA and protein levels and multiparametric flow cytometric analysis to measure immunosenescence markers on T and NK cells.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study seeks to extend our knowledge on exercise interventions during systemic anticancer treatment in patients over 70 years of age. Results from this research will guide the management of older adults during systemic treatment in hospitals seeking to enhance the standard of care.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: <span><span>NCT05131113</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, November 11, 2021.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102818"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145665429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Personalized risk assessment of frailty in long-term cancer survivors 长期癌症幸存者虚弱的个性化风险评估
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102804
Rebecca Forman , Sarah J. Westvold , Jessica B. Long , Jane Fan , Terry Hyslop , Kerry Conlin , Sofia Jacobson , Shi-Yi Wang , Michael S. Leapman , Michael Cecchini , Ira Leeds , Lisa Spees , Carolyn Presley , Faiza Yasin , Melissa Taylor , Tendai Kwaramba , Cary P. Gross , Kevin Oeffinger , Michaela A. Dinan
Introduction: Due to the growth of the cancer survivor population, strategies to facilitate efficient delivery of survivorship care are critical to reduce the risk of adverse events associated with frailty. The objective of this study was to develop a risk stratification tool to identify long-term survivors at the highest risk of becoming frail 5–10 years after cancer diagnosis.
Materials and Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset linked with Medicare data to identify patients with stage I-III breast, prostate, colon, or rectal cancers who lived at least five years from diagnosis and were not severely frail at year five post-diagnosis. Frailty was assessed using the claims-based Kim Frailty Index (FI) categorized by recommended thresholds. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) regression was used to identify clinical and demographic characteristics associated with frailty progression, defined as an increased category of the FI. Significant predictors were used to create clinical prediction rules and stratify survivors into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups.
Results: A total of 87,229 five-year survivors were included. At five years from diagnosis (time zero), 22 % of patients not frail at cancer diagnosis had new onset frailty and were mildly or moderately frail; at 10 years from diagnosis, 61 % had developed new or worsening frailty. Advanced age, comorbidities (RMST ratios ranging from 0.67 [95 % CI 0.65–0.70] to 0.80 [95 % CI 0.77–0.84], baseline moderate frailty at cancer diagnosis (RMST ratios ranging from 0.79 [95 % CI 0.76–0.83] to 0.86 [95 % CI 0.83–0.90]) and at five years post-diagnosis (RMST ratios ranging from 0.63 [95 % CI 0.62–0.64] to 0.71 [95 % CI 0.69–0.73]), living in a high poverty area (RMST ratios ranging from 0.91 [95 % CI 0.87–0.94] to 0.96, [95 % CI 0.93–0.99], and systemic treatments four to five years post-diagnosis (RMST ratios ranging from 0.77 [95 % CI: 0.70–0.84] to 0.86, [95 % CI: 0.84–0.89] were associated with less average time without frailty.
Discussion: Age, comorbidities, prior frailty, and late treatment were associated with frailty in older breast, prostate, colon, and rectal cancer survivors. This risk stratification model can be used by clinicians to assess cancer and age-related risk of frailty and facilitate timely intervention.
导言:由于癌症幸存者人口的增长,促进有效提供生存护理的策略对于减少与虚弱相关的不良事件的风险至关重要。本研究的目的是开发一种风险分层工具,以确定癌症诊断后5-10年内身体虚弱风险最高的长期幸存者。材料和方法:我们使用与医疗保险数据相关联的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据集来识别I-III期乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结肠癌或直肠癌患者,这些患者在诊断后至少生活了5年,并且在诊断后5年没有严重虚弱。虚弱评估使用索赔为基础的金氏虚弱指数(FI)分类推荐阈值。限制平均生存时间(RMST)回归用于确定与衰弱进展相关的临床和人口学特征,定义为FI的增加类别。显著性预测因子用于建立临床预测规则,并将幸存者分为低、中、高风险组。结果:共纳入87,229例5年生存率。在诊断后5年(零时间),22%的癌症诊断时不虚弱的患者出现了新发虚弱,并且是轻度或中度虚弱;在确诊10年后,61%的人出现了新的或恶化的虚弱。先进的年龄、并发症(RMST比率从0.67 (95% CI 0.65 - -0.70), 0.80 (95% CI 0.77 - -0.84),基线中度脆弱在癌症诊断(RMST比率从0.79 (95% CI 0.76 - -0.83), 0.86 (95% CI 0.83 - -0.90)),在五年内post-diagnosis (RMST比率从0.63 (95% CI 0.62 - -0.64), 0.71 (95% CI 0.69 - -0.73)),生活在一个高贫困地区(RMST比率从0.91 (95% CI 0.87 - -0.94), 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 - -0.99),和诊断后4至5年的全身治疗(RMST比值范围为0.77 [95% CI: 0.70-0.84]至0.86,[95% CI: 0.84-0.89])与较短的平均无虚弱时间相关。讨论:年龄、合并症、既往虚弱和晚期治疗与老年乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结肠癌和直肠癌幸存者的虚弱相关。这种风险分层模型可以被临床医生用来评估癌症和年龄相关的虚弱风险,并促进及时干预。
{"title":"Personalized risk assessment of frailty in long-term cancer survivors","authors":"Rebecca Forman ,&nbsp;Sarah J. Westvold ,&nbsp;Jessica B. Long ,&nbsp;Jane Fan ,&nbsp;Terry Hyslop ,&nbsp;Kerry Conlin ,&nbsp;Sofia Jacobson ,&nbsp;Shi-Yi Wang ,&nbsp;Michael S. Leapman ,&nbsp;Michael Cecchini ,&nbsp;Ira Leeds ,&nbsp;Lisa Spees ,&nbsp;Carolyn Presley ,&nbsp;Faiza Yasin ,&nbsp;Melissa Taylor ,&nbsp;Tendai Kwaramba ,&nbsp;Cary P. Gross ,&nbsp;Kevin Oeffinger ,&nbsp;Michaela A. Dinan","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102804","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102804","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Introduction: Due to the growth of the cancer survivor population, strategies to facilitate efficient delivery of survivorship care are critical to reduce the risk of adverse events associated with frailty. The objective of this study was to develop a risk stratification tool to identify long-term survivors at the highest risk of becoming frail 5–10 years after cancer diagnosis.</div><div>Materials and Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset linked with Medicare data to identify patients with stage I-III breast, prostate, colon, or rectal cancers who lived at least five years from diagnosis and were not severely frail at year five post-diagnosis. Frailty was assessed using the claims-based Kim Frailty Index (FI) categorized by recommended thresholds. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) regression was used to identify clinical and demographic characteristics associated with frailty progression, defined as an increased category of the FI. Significant predictors were used to create clinical prediction rules and stratify survivors into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups.</div><div>Results: A total of 87,229 five-year survivors were included. At five years from diagnosis (time zero), 22 % of patients not frail at cancer diagnosis had new onset frailty and were mildly or moderately frail; at 10 years from diagnosis, 61 % had developed new or worsening frailty. Advanced age, comorbidities (RMST ratios ranging from 0.67 [95 % CI 0.65–0.70] to 0.80 [95 % CI 0.77–0.84], baseline moderate frailty at cancer diagnosis (RMST ratios ranging from 0.79 [95 % CI 0.76–0.83] to 0.86 [95 % CI 0.83–0.90]) and at five years post-diagnosis (RMST ratios ranging from 0.63 [95 % CI 0.62–0.64] to 0.71 [95 % CI 0.69–0.73]), living in a high poverty area (RMST ratios ranging from 0.91 [95 % CI 0.87–0.94] to 0.96, [95 % CI 0.93–0.99], and systemic treatments four to five years post-diagnosis (RMST ratios ranging from 0.77 [95 % CI: 0.70–0.84] to 0.86, [95 % CI: 0.84–0.89] were associated with less average time without frailty.</div><div>Discussion: Age, comorbidities, prior frailty, and late treatment were associated with frailty in older breast, prostate, colon, and rectal cancer survivors. This risk stratification model can be used by clinicians to assess cancer and age-related risk of frailty and facilitate timely intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 102804"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145620220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
More than age: Impact of comorbidity and polypharmacy on immune-related adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and toxicity management in older patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors 超过年龄:在接受免疫检查点抑制剂的老年患者中,合并症和多药治疗对免疫相关不良事件、停药和毒性管理的影响
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102813
Anja Gesierich , Eran Demeter , Bastian Schilling , Barbara Deschler-Baier
{"title":"More than age: Impact of comorbidity and polypharmacy on immune-related adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and toxicity management in older patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors","authors":"Anja Gesierich ,&nbsp;Eran Demeter ,&nbsp;Bastian Schilling ,&nbsp;Barbara Deschler-Baier","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102813","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102813","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 102813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145549526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Important aspects of care and priorities of older patients with cancer: The PRIORITY multicenter cohort study. 老年癌症患者护理的重要方面和优先事项:优先多中心队列研究
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102812
Thomas Grellety, Carine Bellera, Coralie Cantarel, Cécile Mertens, Mathilde Cabart, Guilhem Roubaud, Marie-Claude Chantecaille, Hervé Desclos, Corinne Souyris, Patrick Bouchaert, Emmanuelle Bourbouloux, Catherine Terret, Cécile Delattre, Laurent Cany, Caroline Lalet, Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier, Pierre Soubeyran, Camille Chakiba Brugere

Introduction: Data on treatment preferences in older cancer patients are lacking. We aimed to identify their priorities.

Materials and methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study on patients with cancer aged ≥70 and 18-69, initiating first medical treatment. Patients and physicians prioritized eight aspects of care: treatment efficacy, life expectancy, autonomy, daily tasks, social activities, treatment burden, toxicity, and economic burden via self-completed questionnaires. The primary endpoint was the priorities of older patients.

Results: We included 233 older and 100 younger patients at eight sites. In the older patient cohort, median age was 79 (min-max: 70-97), breast cancer represented 34 % (N = 78) and lung 12 % (N = 27). Metastatic setting concerned 45 % of the patients. The most frequently rated top priority at treatment initiation was treatment efficacy in both older (73 %) and younger cohorts (79 %), followed by autonomy in the older cohort (13 %) and life expectancy in the younger cohort (14 %). Treatment efficacy was almost systematically cited in the top four priorities for both older (94 %) and younger patients (96 %), followed by autonomy (86 %) for older and life expectancy (82 %) for younger patients. These priorities were stable (>70 %) between initiation and three months for each cohort. Agreement rate for prioritization of aspects of care between older patients and physicians was 87 % for treatment efficacy and 64 % for autonomy.

Discussion: Autonomy was the second most cited priority among older patients, yet many physicians failed to recognize this, potentially affecting treatment decisions. These findings highlight the need for shared decision-making to align treatment choices with patient expectations.

关于老年癌症患者治疗偏好的数据缺乏。我们的目标是确定他们的优先事项。材料和方法:我们对年龄≥70岁和18-69岁的癌症患者进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,并开始了首次药物治疗。患者和医生通过自填问卷对治疗效果、预期寿命、自主性、日常任务、社交活动、治疗负担、毒性和经济负担八个方面的护理进行优先排序。主要终点是老年患者。结果:我们纳入了8个地点的233名老年患者和100名年轻患者。在老年患者队列中,中位年龄为79岁(最小-最大年龄:70-97岁),乳腺癌占34% (N = 78),肺癌占12% (N = 27)。45%的患者有转移性。在治疗开始时,最常被评为最优先的是老年队列(73%)和年轻队列(79%)的治疗疗效,其次是老年队列的自主性(13%)和年轻队列的预期寿命(14%)。对于老年患者(94%)和年轻患者(96%),治疗疗效几乎被系统地引用在前四个优先事项中,其次是老年患者的自主性(86%)和年轻患者的预期寿命(82%)。这些优先级在每个队列开始到3个月之间是稳定的(约70%)。老年患者和医生在治疗效果和自主性方面对护理优先顺序的满意率分别为87%和64%。讨论:在老年患者中,自主性是第二大优先事项,然而许多医生没有认识到这一点,这可能会影响治疗决策。这些发现强调了共同决策的必要性,以使治疗选择与患者期望保持一致。
{"title":"Important aspects of care and priorities of older patients with cancer: The PRIORITY multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Thomas Grellety, Carine Bellera, Coralie Cantarel, Cécile Mertens, Mathilde Cabart, Guilhem Roubaud, Marie-Claude Chantecaille, Hervé Desclos, Corinne Souyris, Patrick Bouchaert, Emmanuelle Bourbouloux, Catherine Terret, Cécile Delattre, Laurent Cany, Caroline Lalet, Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier, Pierre Soubeyran, Camille Chakiba Brugere","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data on treatment preferences in older cancer patients are lacking. We aimed to identify their priorities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study on patients with cancer aged ≥70 and 18-69, initiating first medical treatment. Patients and physicians prioritized eight aspects of care: treatment efficacy, life expectancy, autonomy, daily tasks, social activities, treatment burden, toxicity, and economic burden via self-completed questionnaires. The primary endpoint was the priorities of older patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 233 older and 100 younger patients at eight sites. In the older patient cohort, median age was 79 (min-max: 70-97), breast cancer represented 34 % (N = 78) and lung 12 % (N = 27). Metastatic setting concerned 45 % of the patients. The most frequently rated top priority at treatment initiation was treatment efficacy in both older (73 %) and younger cohorts (79 %), followed by autonomy in the older cohort (13 %) and life expectancy in the younger cohort (14 %). Treatment efficacy was almost systematically cited in the top four priorities for both older (94 %) and younger patients (96 %), followed by autonomy (86 %) for older and life expectancy (82 %) for younger patients. These priorities were stable (>70 %) between initiation and three months for each cohort. Agreement rate for prioritization of aspects of care between older patients and physicians was 87 % for treatment efficacy and 64 % for autonomy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Autonomy was the second most cited priority among older patients, yet many physicians failed to recognize this, potentially affecting treatment decisions. These findings highlight the need for shared decision-making to align treatment choices with patient expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":" ","pages":"102812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145512822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between geriatric assessment domains and chemotherapy among older women with breast cancer 老年乳腺癌妇女的老年评估领域与化疗之间的关系。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102811
Koshy Alexander , Sacha Roberts , Amy L. Tin , Jasmeet Singh , Diana Lake , Elissa Meditz , Abha Kulkarni , Manpreet Boparai , Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki , Armin Shahrokni
{"title":"Association between geriatric assessment domains and chemotherapy among older women with breast cancer","authors":"Koshy Alexander ,&nbsp;Sacha Roberts ,&nbsp;Amy L. Tin ,&nbsp;Jasmeet Singh ,&nbsp;Diana Lake ,&nbsp;Elissa Meditz ,&nbsp;Abha Kulkarni ,&nbsp;Manpreet Boparai ,&nbsp;Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki ,&nbsp;Armin Shahrokni","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102811","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102811","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 102811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145513001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on“Survival and risk factors for death in older adults with primary head and neck cancer: A retrospective observational cohort study” 对“老年人原发性头颈癌的生存和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性观察队列研究”的评论
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102807
Yu Tian , Hui Leng , XiangLong Hao , RuPeng Qu , AiPing Wang
{"title":"Comment on“Survival and risk factors for death in older adults with primary head and neck cancer: A retrospective observational cohort study”","authors":"Yu Tian ,&nbsp;Hui Leng ,&nbsp;XiangLong Hao ,&nbsp;RuPeng Qu ,&nbsp;AiPing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102807","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102807","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 102807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145482221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to letters to the editor 回复给编辑的信件
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102809
Hanna Kerminen , Esa Jämsen , Saara Markkanen
{"title":"Response to letters to the editor","authors":"Hanna Kerminen ,&nbsp;Esa Jämsen ,&nbsp;Saara Markkanen","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102809","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102809","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 102809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145475010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond age and anaemia: A reappraisal of prognostic factors in geriatric head and neck cancer 超越年龄和贫血:对老年头颈癌预后因素的重新评估
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102808
Brijesh Sathian, Siham Mohammed Al Mushaifri, Ebtehal Obeidat, Hanadi Al Hamad
{"title":"Beyond age and anaemia: A reappraisal of prognostic factors in geriatric head and neck cancer","authors":"Brijesh Sathian,&nbsp;Siham Mohammed Al Mushaifri,&nbsp;Ebtehal Obeidat,&nbsp;Hanadi Al Hamad","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102808","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102808","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 102808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145475011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alcohol consumption in older cancer survivors: An analysis of adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines 老年癌症幸存者的酒精消费:对世界癌症研究基金会和美国癌症研究协会指南的依从性分析。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102810
Cara L. Chase , Zachary L. Chaplow , Colleen Spees , Jade Smith , Jessica L. Krok-Schoen
{"title":"Alcohol consumption in older cancer survivors: An analysis of adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines","authors":"Cara L. Chase ,&nbsp;Zachary L. Chaplow ,&nbsp;Colleen Spees ,&nbsp;Jade Smith ,&nbsp;Jessica L. Krok-Schoen","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102810","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102810","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 102810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145471046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1