Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health最新文献

Immigrants to Canada face unique barriers that result in them accessing publicly funded healthcare services differently than non-immigrants. These barriers are particularly critical in the context of Emergency General Surgery (EGS) where timely access to healthcare is essential for better health outcomes. This study compares preoperative healthcare utilization between immigrants undergoing EGS with non-immigrants. EGS procedures in British Columbia between 2013 and 2021 were analyzed using population-based linked immigration, physician billing, and hospital discharge summary data. Preoperative primary care visits, specialist consults, imaging, and emergency department (ED) visits in the one-year period preceding the EGS were compared between immigrants with non-immigrants. Sub-analyses examined years since immigration and ethnic minority status. Of 77,937 EGS procedures, immigrants accounted for 14.6%. Immigrants had fewer pre-operative primary care visits (RR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.92-0.96), specialist consults (RR: 0.88, 95%CI: 0.85-0.91), imaging services (RR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.93-0.99), and ED visits (RR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.68-0.72). Within the immigrant cohort, fewer primary care and ED visits were observed among the newest immigrants and among ethnic minorities. Immigrants accessed fewer healthcare services in the period preceding their EGS. Differences were most pronounced among new immigrants and immigrants from culturally-diverse countries who may be unfamiliar with the structure or processes for accessing healthcare services. Policy interventions are needed to prospectively link immigrants at highest risk of EGS with appropriate health services.

Medication errors are common after pediatric hospital discharge, and families who use languages other than English may be at increased risk. In this study, we aimed to determine the association between caregiver language and medication errors after pediatric hospital discharge across two different clinical sites. We performed a cross-sectional study surveying parents who speak English and Spanish of hospitalized children < 18 years old who were prescribed a new scheduled oral medication upon discharge. We recruited patients between March 2022-November 2023 from two clinical sites, an academic tertiary care center and a community-based hospital. We surveyed parents about management of their children's medication at home and collected patient demographics as well as visit/ hospital characteristics. Bivariate analyses compared subject/visit-level factors and discharge processes with medication errors. We surveyed 145 parents, 59 of whom use Spanish and 86 who use English. Liquid medications (88%) and antibiotics (78%) were prescribed most frequently. Overall, 50 medication errors made by 39 unique individuals were identified, including 18 dosing errors. 19% of parents who use Spanish reported dosing errors compared to 8.1% of parents who use English (p = 0.06). Parents whose children were discharged from the academic tertiary care center were more likely to make a medication administration error (p = 0.03). Medication errors were common after pediatric hospital discharge and were more frequent among parents whose children were discharged from an academic children's hospital. Language of care was not associated with statistically significant differences in medication error rates. Future studies should explore factors related to site of care and language that may contribute to post-discharge errors.

Empathic communication is known to play a pivotal role in healthcare, by building trust and ensuring patients feel respected. Yet, increases in global migration have added novel intercultural complexity to interactions within a variety of domestic work contexts, including healthcare. Despite this trend, the question of how Western-trained healthcare providers navigate intercultural communication challenges in clinical encounters remains under explored. Considering Canada's growing Middle Eastern immigrant population, this study sought to investigate how Ontario healthcare providers have conceptualized, enacted, and evaluated empathic communication with Middle Eastern newcomer patients. Using a qualitative methodology, we conducted 26 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers. Our results revealed three interrelated conceptual themes: attentive perspective-taking, conveying active listening, and accommodating/empowering patients. These findings advance existing scholarship on empathic healthcare communication by underscoring how healthcare providers balance professional boundaries with cultural accommodation. On a practical level, this study also offers guidance for intercultural communication training: it identifies practical behavioural strategies that foreground relational attunement and behavioural flexibility, which can equip providers to navigate complex, diverse care encounters with confidence and efficacy.

Immigrant caregivers and their children encounter manifold barriers to mental health service use with unique challenges in the U.S.-Mexico border region. This study examined predisposing, enabling and need factors associated with mental health service use by immigrant caregivers and their children. A cross-sectional survey of 240 immigrant caregivers with children living in New Mexico was conducted. Three domains were examined for their associations with mental health service utilization among caregivers and children. Domains included predisposing (caregiver age, household composition, gender, education, religiosity, duration of US residency, adverse childhood experiences, English proficiency), enabling (caregiver resilience, employment, income, insurance status, health/social service use, social safety net use, resource navigation, help-seeking attitudes), and need (depression symptoms, immigration stress, housing insecurity) factors. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed for each domain and significant variables at a p < 0.05 level were included in final models. In the final model, caregiver mental health service utilization was positively associated with help-seeking attitudes and depression symptoms. For children, mental health service utilization was positively associated with health/social service use. This study identifies factors that may impact the use of mental health services by immigrant families living along the US-Mexico border. Results highlight the importance of culturally informed mental health outreach and integrating mental health services within coordinated and supportive health, social, and safety net services.

Primary health care (PHC) in Thailand's border regions remains challenged by the needs of mobile and marginalized populations, despite the country's progressive Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This qualitative study explores the dynamics of cross-border PHC systems along Thailand's borders with Myanmar, Lao PDR, and Cambodia through a people-centered lens. We conducted 101 semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders across six border provinces. Findings reveal that migrants and refugees face complex barriers, including legal exclusion, geographic isolation, and fear of deportation, leading to reliance on self-medication and delayed care. Health priorities consistently included communicable diseases, maternal and child health, and occupational risks, yet the context varied significantly by border. The Myanmar border was characterized by Non-Government Organizations (NGOs)-dependent, fragmented services for undocumented migrants and refugees. In contrast, the Lao PDR border demonstrated more stable, seasonal migration and smoother bilateral health cooperation. The Cambodia border was defined by labor migration and inconsistent employer-based health arrangements. Multi-stakeholder collaboration-particularly through migrant health volunteers and NGOs-was identified as both feasible and essential for service delivery, but remains ad hoc and donor-dependent. Sustainable solutions require formalizing the roles of community-based actors, creating institutionalized coordination platforms, and developing tailored, context-specific strategies that address the fundamental social determinants of health. Achieving health equity in these borderlands necessitates inclusive policies that bridge the gap between national UHC ambitions and the realities of cross-border mobility.

Culturally sensitive palliative care for patients with a migration background (PwM) remains a critical but underexplored field, especially in the German healthcare context. Our study employs Dave Gray's empathy map to capture healthcare providers' perspectives on the challenges, needs, and experiences of PwM in hospice and palliative care. We investigated palliative care challenges through open-ended questions in an online survey conducted across various hospice and palliative care settings. Based on 332 completed responses, our analysis revealed significant barriers to delivering culturally sensitive care. Using qualitative content analysis, we applied an empathy map to identify categories. Findings showed that language barriers and cultural insensitivity notably hindered communication, access, and trust-building. PwM often relied on family networks, which caused delayed care-seeking and logistical difficulties. Despite these challenges, PwM strived for dignity, trust, and care aligned with their cultural background. Our study highlights the importance of empathy-based approaches in hospice and palliative care and the effectiveness of the empathy map as an instrument for identifying challenges and gaps. By addressing the specific needs of PwM, the findings contribute meaningful insights for healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers.