Pub Date : 2025-04-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.133223
Luigi Pannone, Steffen Uffenorde, Antonia Bosworth Smith, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Pasquale Vergara, Ioannis Doundoulakis, Antonio Sorgente, Alvise Del Monte, Giacomo Talevi, Ingrid Overeinder, Gezim Bala, Alexandre Almorad, Erwin Ströker, Juan Sieira, Ali Gharaviri, Mark La Meir, Pedro Brugada, Andrea Sarkozy, Gian Battista Chierchia, Carlo de Asmundis
Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the main ablation strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Different technologies are available for PVI, including various cryoballoon catheters (CB-A). Compared with the Arctic Front Advance Pro™, the novel POLARx FIT™ CB-A might reduce costs for atrial fibrillation ablation. Objective: The aim of this study is to perform a health economic evaluation of two cryoballoon systems for PVI procedures. Methods: All patients undergoing their first PVI procedure with POLARx FIT™ CB-A or the Arctic Front Advance Pro™ CB-A were prospectively enrolled. The health economic analysis was performed on the index hospitalization and procedure. The primary safety endpoint included procedure-related adverse events within the index hospitalization. A decision tree model was built to estimate downstream costs. Results: A total of 80 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing PVI were analyzed, with 40 patients in each arm. Compared with the Arctic Front Advance Pro™ CB-A, POLARx FIT™ CB-A showed a lower procedure time, left-atrium dwell time, and fluoroscopy time. The complication rate was low (6.3%) and included 3 reversible phrenic nerve palsies in the POLARx FIT™ CB-A group vs 2 in the Arctic Front Advance Pro™ CB-A group. Compared with the Arctic Front Advance Pro, the POLARx FIT™ CB-A was associated with lower procedural costs (€2069.7 ± €165.2 vs €2239.5 ± €366.0; P =.009). Conclusion: The POLARx FIT™ CB-A was associated with a shorter procedure time, translating into lower procedural costs, compared with the Arctic Front Advance Pro. Complications were rare and comparable between the two technologies.
背景:肺静脉隔离(PVI)是治疗阵发性心房颤动的主要消融策略。不同的技术可用于PVI,包括各种低温球囊导管(CB-A)。与Arctic Front Advance Pro™相比,新型的POLARx FIT™CB-A可能会降低房颤消融的成本。目的:本研究的目的是对两种用于PVI手术的冷冻球囊系统进行健康经济评估。方法:前瞻性纳入所有使用POLARx FIT™CB-A或Arctic Front Advance Pro™CB-A进行首次PVI手术的患者。对指标、住院时间和手术过程进行卫生经济学分析。主要安全终点包括指数住院期间与手术相关的不良事件。建立了一个决策树模型来估计下游成本。结果:共分析80例阵发性心房颤动患者行PVI,每组40例。与Arctic Front Advance Pro™CB-A相比,POLARx FIT™CB-A显示出更短的手术时间、左心房停留时间和透视时间。并发症发生率较低(6.3%),在POLARx FIT™CB-A组中有3例可逆性膈神经麻痹,而在Arctic Front Advance Pro™CB-A组中有2例。与Arctic Front Advance Pro相比,POLARx FIT™CB-A的操作成本更低(2069.7±165.2欧元vs 2239.5±366.0欧元;P = .009)。结论:与Arctic Front Advance Pro相比,POLARx FIT™CB-A具有更短的手术时间,转化为更低的手术成本。两种技术之间的并发症非常罕见且具有可比性。
{"title":"Cryoballoon Ablation With the POLARx FIT or the Arctic Front Advance Pro for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Health Economic Analysis.","authors":"Luigi Pannone, Steffen Uffenorde, Antonia Bosworth Smith, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Pasquale Vergara, Ioannis Doundoulakis, Antonio Sorgente, Alvise Del Monte, Giacomo Talevi, Ingrid Overeinder, Gezim Bala, Alexandre Almorad, Erwin Ströker, Juan Sieira, Ali Gharaviri, Mark La Meir, Pedro Brugada, Andrea Sarkozy, Gian Battista Chierchia, Carlo de Asmundis","doi":"10.36469/001c.133223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.133223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the main ablation strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Different technologies are available for PVI, including various cryoballoon catheters (CB-A). Compared with the Arctic Front Advance Pro™, the novel POLARx FIT™ CB-A might reduce costs for atrial fibrillation ablation. <b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study is to perform a health economic evaluation of two cryoballoon systems for PVI procedures. <b>Methods:</b> All patients undergoing their first PVI procedure with POLARx FIT™ CB-A or the Arctic Front Advance Pro™ CB-A were prospectively enrolled. The health economic analysis was performed on the index hospitalization and procedure. The primary safety endpoint included procedure-related adverse events within the index hospitalization. A decision tree model was built to estimate downstream costs. <b>Results:</b> A total of 80 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing PVI were analyzed, with 40 patients in each arm. Compared with the Arctic Front Advance Pro™ CB-A, POLARx FIT™ CB-A showed a lower procedure time, left-atrium dwell time, and fluoroscopy time. The complication rate was low (6.3%) and included 3 reversible phrenic nerve palsies in the POLARx FIT™ CB-A group vs 2 in the Arctic Front Advance Pro™ CB-A group. Compared with the Arctic Front Advance Pro, the POLARx FIT™ CB-A was associated with lower procedural costs (€2069.7 ± €165.2 vs €2239.5 ± €366.0; <i>P</i> =.009). <b>Conclusion:</b> The POLARx FIT™ CB-A was associated with a shorter procedure time, translating into lower procedural costs, compared with the Arctic Front Advance Pro. Complications were rare and comparable between the two technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017263/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144039762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.133796
Mark Connolly, Nikos Kotsopoulos, Jinjing Li, Georgina Chambers
<p><p><b>Background:</b> Public funding for assisted reproduction varies across countries, which can influence the numbers of infertile couples treated annually, and consequently the numbers of children born each year from this technology. As infertility is a medical condition treated within the healthcare system, it must compete against all other medical interventions for funding. This raises questions about how to evaluate a technology that gives rise to human life compared with other healthcare interventions that reduce morbidity and mortality. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate annual public spending on assisted reproduction technology (ART) in Australia to determine the likely fiscal impact for government over the projected lifetime of an ART-conceived birth cohort. <b>Methods:</b> A public economic framework was used to evaluate the number of children born from ART procedures performed in Australia in 2021 based on projected future lifetime tax contributions and public benefits received. We leveraged data from the Survey of Income and Housing conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics and imputations from tax-transfer microsimulations over the lifetime of the cohort estimating cumulative net-taxes. Public spending per pupil for education and lifetime health costs (in Australian dollars) were included in the benefits estimates. <b>Results:</b> We estimated lifetime gross taxes per individual of A <math><mn>841</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>631</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>A</mi></math> 580 182 in direct taxation of earnings and A <math><mn>261</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>448</mn> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>j</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>g</mi> <m
背景:各国对辅助生殖的公共资助各不相同,这可能影响每年接受治疗的不育夫妇的数量,从而影响每年通过这项技术出生的儿童的数量。由于不孕症是在医疗保健系统内治疗的一种医疗状况,它必须与所有其他医疗干预措施竞争资金。这就提出了一个问题,即与其他降低发病率和死亡率的医疗保健干预措施相比,如何评估一项提高人类生命的技术。目的:评估澳大利亚在辅助生殖技术(ART)上的年度公共支出,以确定政府在ART受孕队列的预计寿命期间可能产生的财政影响。方法:根据预计的未来终身税收贡献和收到的公共福利,使用公共经济框架评估2021年澳大利亚ART手术中出生的儿童数量。我们利用了澳大利亚统计局进行的收入和住房调查的数据,以及在估计累计净税收的队列的整个生命周期中从税收转移微观模拟中推算出的数据。每个学生的教育和终身保健费用的公共支出(以澳元计算)已列入福利估计数。结果:我们估计每个人一生的总税收为841 631澳元,其中581 182澳元为收入直接税,261 448澳元为收入直接税。f t e r d e d u c t我n g l f e t m e t r n s f e r s r e n c e i v e d d r t t r e A t m e n c o s t s n r t - c o n c e i v e d c h i l d w s p r o j e c t e d t o g e n e r t e 70 688打折一生中净税收收入。根据每个儿童的平均政府支出,可以观察到终身财政收益-成本比为2.68。根据2021年ART治疗队列,预计在18364名出生儿童的一生中,政府将净赚12.9亿澳元的未来税收。结论:当前政府在抗逆转录病毒治疗方面的支出实现了正的净财政收益。我们观察到,每增加1澳元,就会有2.68澳元的未来折现净税收,而每增加1澳元,就会有2.68澳元的未来折现净税收。这些发现对未来工资增长和通货膨胀等经济状况很敏感。
{"title":"Estimating the Fiscal Value of Children Conceived from Assisted Reproduction Technology in Australia Applying a Public Economic Perspective.","authors":"Mark Connolly, Nikos Kotsopoulos, Jinjing Li, Georgina Chambers","doi":"10.36469/001c.133796","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.133796","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Public funding for assisted reproduction varies across countries, which can influence the numbers of infertile couples treated annually, and consequently the numbers of children born each year from this technology. As infertility is a medical condition treated within the healthcare system, it must compete against all other medical interventions for funding. This raises questions about how to evaluate a technology that gives rise to human life compared with other healthcare interventions that reduce morbidity and mortality. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate annual public spending on assisted reproduction technology (ART) in Australia to determine the likely fiscal impact for government over the projected lifetime of an ART-conceived birth cohort. <b>Methods:</b> A public economic framework was used to evaluate the number of children born from ART procedures performed in Australia in 2021 based on projected future lifetime tax contributions and public benefits received. We leveraged data from the Survey of Income and Housing conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics and imputations from tax-transfer microsimulations over the lifetime of the cohort estimating cumulative net-taxes. Public spending per pupil for education and lifetime health costs (in Australian dollars) were included in the benefits estimates. <b>Results:</b> We estimated lifetime gross taxes per individual of A <math><mn>841</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>631</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>A</mi></math> 580 182 in direct taxation of earnings and A <math><mn>261</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>448</mn> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>j</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>g</mi> <m","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009558/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144022281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.134140
Rebecca Smith, Samara Eisenberg, Aaron Turner-Phifer, Jacqueline LeGrand, Sarah Pincus, Yousra Omer, Fei Wang, Bruce Pyenson
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2024.124604.].
[这更正了文章DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2024.124604.]。
{"title":"Erratum: Article Correction: We Are on the Verge of Breakthrough Cures for Type 1 Diabetes, but Who Are the 2 Million Americans Who Have It?","authors":"Rebecca Smith, Samara Eisenberg, Aaron Turner-Phifer, Jacqueline LeGrand, Sarah Pincus, Yousra Omer, Fei Wang, Bruce Pyenson","doi":"10.36469/001c.134140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.134140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2024.124604.].</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"138-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009549/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144007398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-09eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.133639
Zrinka Orlović, Lucila Rey-Ares, María Florencia Viozzi, Rui Martins, Juliana Villarreal Ramírez, Santiago Veiga, Mark P Connolly
Background: Migraine is a prevalent, underdiagnosed, highly debilitating neurological condition that affects individuals' quality of life and often negatively influences normal daily activities. Objectives: The study objective is to estimate the economic burden of migraine to the Argentine government by assessing the impact of the disease on tax revenue, absenteeism, and social support transfers. Methods: The analysis combines a cross-sectional model utilizing national demographic data and published migraine prevalence rates to estimate the annual burden for the entire migraine-affected cohort, and a longitudinal model assessing the average burden per individual from the age of 40, over a 20-year horizon. A fiscal framework based on generational accounting evaluated the impact of migraine on government finances. Sources of revenue such as direct and indirect taxes were weighted against elements of public expenditure (public sector absenteeism, healthcare expenses, and financial support) and compared with the general population. The effect of migraine on occupational outcomes was sourced from peer-reviewed publications, and costs were sourced from national databases. Results were reported as incremental fiscal consequences (2023 US dollars) and were discounted at 3% annually. Results: The fiscal burden of migraine in Argentina was estimated to be 1237 million across the entire migraine population. Annually, 29% of government costs were due to public sector absenteeism, 39% related to healthcare costs, 19% to foregone direct and indirect tax revenue, and 12% to foregone corporation taxes. Additional government transfers represented a minor contribution to the overall fiscal impact of migraine in Argentina. Discussion: The high rate of informal employment is likely to undermine disease burden estimates. Gender disparities were notable, with women bearing 76% of the burden, highlighting the need for gender-specific interventions. Conclusions: This study reveals a significant economic burden of migraine to the Argentinian government, primarily driven by absenteeism, healthcare costs, and foregone tax contributions. Targeted, gender-responsive healthcare and labor policies, especially for sectors with high informal employment, could help reduce these fiscal impacts.
{"title":"Unveiling the Public Economic Burden of Migraine in Argentina.","authors":"Zrinka Orlović, Lucila Rey-Ares, María Florencia Viozzi, Rui Martins, Juliana Villarreal Ramírez, Santiago Veiga, Mark P Connolly","doi":"10.36469/001c.133639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.133639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Migraine is a prevalent, underdiagnosed, highly debilitating neurological condition that affects individuals' quality of life and often negatively influences normal daily activities. <b>Objectives:</b> The study objective is to estimate the economic burden of migraine to the Argentine government by assessing the impact of the disease on tax revenue, absenteeism, and social support transfers. <b>Methods:</b> The analysis combines a cross-sectional model utilizing national demographic data and published migraine prevalence rates to estimate the annual burden for the entire migraine-affected cohort, and a longitudinal model assessing the average burden per individual from the age of 40, over a 20-year horizon. A fiscal framework based on generational accounting evaluated the impact of migraine on government finances. Sources of revenue such as direct and indirect taxes were weighted against elements of public expenditure (public sector absenteeism, healthcare expenses, and financial support) and compared with the general population. The effect of migraine on occupational outcomes was sourced from peer-reviewed publications, and costs were sourced from national databases. Results were reported as incremental fiscal consequences (2023 US dollars) and were discounted at 3% annually. <b>Results:</b> The fiscal burden of migraine in Argentina was estimated to be <math><mn>6505</mn> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi></math> 1237 million across the entire migraine population. Annually, 29% of government costs were due to public sector absenteeism, 39% related to healthcare costs, 19% to foregone direct and indirect tax revenue, and 12% to foregone corporation taxes. Additional government transfers represented a minor contribution to the overall fiscal impact of migraine in Argentina. <b>Discussion:</b> The high rate of informal employment is likely to undermine disease burden estimates. Gender disparities were notable, with women bearing 76% of the burden, highlighting the need for gender-specific interventions. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study reveals a significant economic burden of migraine to the Argentinian government, primarily driven by absenteeism, healthcare costs, and foregone tax contributions. Targeted, gender-responsive healthcare and labor policies, especially for sectors with high informal employment, could help reduce these fiscal impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"129-137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991664/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144029304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-03eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.131811
Eliza Kruger, Hayley M de Freitas, Iris Ferrecchia, Millie Gaydon, Andrew Lloyd
Background: Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSDIa) is a rare inherited disorder that can lead to renal and hepatic complications, brain damage, and death. There is a lack of qualitative research describing the impact of GSDIa on individuals and their caregivers. Objective: This study was designed to describe the individual experiences of those affected by GSDIa through qualitative methods. Methods: Individuals with GSDIa and caregivers were recruited through two patient associations (US, UK). Participants were asked to write narratives about their experiences with GSDIa in their own words, with no set questions or topics. The resulting narrative accounts were analyzed thematically using a primarily inductive approach. Themes describing the impact of GSDIa on individuals and caregivers were identified. Results: Eight caregivers, three of whom had lost a child to GSDIa, and 11 individuals living with GSDIa provided written summaries of their experiences of life with the condition. Participants described symptoms, the burden of managing frequent cornstarch feeds, and the broader impacts of GSDIa. These included effects on daily activities, family, emotional and social functioning, romantic relationships, and educational/professional impacts. Participants also described challenges related to obtaining diagnosis and support, and the lack of GSDIa knowledge from healthcare professionals. Discussion: This study provided novel insights into the impact of GSDIa on individuals living with the condition and their caregivers. Participants reported a wide range of issues in their narratives and openly shared sensitive information about their experiences, which may not have been captured if they had taken part in a semi-structured interview format. Conclusion: The narrative method yielded a rich data set that provided details of the varied and individual experiences of GSDIa not captured by traditional quantitative methods or structured interviews. The narratives highlighted the unmet needs of both caregivers of and patients with GSDIa around cornstarch management, obstacles to proper treatment from healthcare professionals, and the absence of effective treatments. The open-ended narrative approach had advantages over standard qualitative methods to capture greater insight into individual experiences directly from participants in their own words.
{"title":"People and Families Affected by Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia: An Analysis of Narrative Accounts Written by Individuals Living with GSDIa and Their Caregivers.","authors":"Eliza Kruger, Hayley M de Freitas, Iris Ferrecchia, Millie Gaydon, Andrew Lloyd","doi":"10.36469/001c.131811","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.131811","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSDIa) is a rare inherited disorder that can lead to renal and hepatic complications, brain damage, and death. There is a lack of qualitative research describing the impact of GSDIa on individuals and their caregivers. <b>Objective:</b> This study was designed to describe the individual experiences of those affected by GSDIa through qualitative methods. <b>Methods:</b> Individuals with GSDIa and caregivers were recruited through two patient associations (US, UK). Participants were asked to write narratives about their experiences with GSDIa in their own words, with no set questions or topics. The resulting narrative accounts were analyzed thematically using a primarily inductive approach. Themes describing the impact of GSDIa on individuals and caregivers were identified. <b>Results:</b> Eight caregivers, three of whom had lost a child to GSDIa, and 11 individuals living with GSDIa provided written summaries of their experiences of life with the condition. Participants described symptoms, the burden of managing frequent cornstarch feeds, and the broader impacts of GSDIa. These included effects on daily activities, family, emotional and social functioning, romantic relationships, and educational/professional impacts. Participants also described challenges related to obtaining diagnosis and support, and the lack of GSDIa knowledge from healthcare professionals. <b>Discussion:</b> This study provided novel insights into the impact of GSDIa on individuals living with the condition and their caregivers. Participants reported a wide range of issues in their narratives and openly shared sensitive information about their experiences, which may not have been captured if they had taken part in a semi-structured interview format. <b>Conclusion:</b> The narrative method yielded a rich data set that provided details of the varied and individual experiences of GSDIa not captured by traditional quantitative methods or structured interviews. The narratives highlighted the unmet needs of both caregivers of and patients with GSDIa around cornstarch management, obstacles to proper treatment from healthcare professionals, and the absence of effective treatments. The open-ended narrative approach had advantages over standard qualitative methods to capture greater insight into individual experiences directly from participants in their own words.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972011/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143795604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-17eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.130066
Antonia Bosworth Smith, Ubong Silas, Alex Veloz, Peter Mallow, Barbara Pisani, Diana Bonderman, Rhodri Saunders
Background: The disease burden of heart failure is mainly driven by high hospital readmission rates. Remote monitoring devices can be used to assess the status of patients after discharge and identify early signs of worsening symptoms. Initial studies indicated that Heart Failure Management System (HFMS), a novel monitoring device, can prevent hospital readmission. Objective: To determine the cost effectiveness of HFMS compared with standard of care (SOC) in the United States. Methods: A Markov model was developed to follow patients after their discharge from index hospitalization for heart failure. The costs and outcomes were estimated for 5 years. The patient cohort was initially in "outpatient care," where they are at risk of an emergency room visit or hospital readmission. If hospitalized, patients returned to a second outpatient care health state. An "escalation of care" (eg, surgical intervention) may have removed patients from the intervention. The model took the payer perspective with costs in 2022 US dollars. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio measured effectiveness through hospital readmissions. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set to the published cost of a heart failure rehospitalization ($10 737). Sensitivity and scenario analyses explored the robustness of the model to changes in inputs. Results: Compared with SOC, HFMS reduced the mean cost of care by 155 122 vs $161 846) over the 5-year period. The mean number of hospital readmissions was reduced to 1.075 with HFMS from 1.201 with SOC (-0.126 events). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that HFMS was a dominant strategy compared with SOC, leading to reduced costs and hospital readmissions in 93.4% of the 1000 Monte Carlo simulations; 94.1% of the simulations fell below the willingness-topay threshold. Savings with HFMS emerged from the third month. Discussion: The results indicated the cost-effectiveness of HFMS compared with SOC. The sensitivity analyses supported this finding. Reducing costly hospital readmissions may help to alleviate the burden of heart failure. Longer-term data on HFMS are encouraged to confirm or contest the model outcomes. Conclusions: The use of HFMS is expected to save costs and reduce hospitalizations over a 5-year period compared with the current SOC.
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Heart Failure Management System in the United States.","authors":"Antonia Bosworth Smith, Ubong Silas, Alex Veloz, Peter Mallow, Barbara Pisani, Diana Bonderman, Rhodri Saunders","doi":"10.36469/001c.130066","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.130066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The disease burden of heart failure is mainly driven by high hospital readmission rates. Remote monitoring devices can be used to assess the status of patients after discharge and identify early signs of worsening symptoms. Initial studies indicated that Heart Failure Management System (HFMS), a novel monitoring device, can prevent hospital readmission. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the cost effectiveness of HFMS compared with standard of care (SOC) in the United States. <b>Methods:</b> A Markov model was developed to follow patients after their discharge from index hospitalization for heart failure. The costs and outcomes were estimated for 5 years. The patient cohort was initially in \"outpatient care,\" where they are at risk of an emergency room visit or hospital readmission. If hospitalized, patients returned to a second outpatient care health state. An \"escalation of care\" (eg, surgical intervention) may have removed patients from the intervention. The model took the payer perspective with costs in 2022 US dollars. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio measured effectiveness through hospital readmissions. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set to the published cost of a heart failure rehospitalization ($10 737). Sensitivity and scenario analyses explored the robustness of the model to changes in inputs. <b>Results:</b> Compared with SOC, HFMS reduced the mean cost of care by <math><mn>6723</mn> <mo>(</mo></math> 155 122 vs $161 846) over the 5-year period. The mean number of hospital readmissions was reduced to 1.075 with HFMS from 1.201 with SOC (-0.126 events). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that HFMS was a dominant strategy compared with SOC, leading to reduced costs and hospital readmissions in 93.4% of the 1000 Monte Carlo simulations; 94.1% of the simulations fell below the willingness-topay threshold. Savings with HFMS emerged from the third month. <b>Discussion:</b> The results indicated the cost-effectiveness of HFMS compared with SOC. The sensitivity analyses supported this finding. Reducing costly hospital readmissions may help to alleviate the burden of heart failure. Longer-term data on HFMS are encouraged to confirm or contest the model outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of HFMS is expected to save costs and reduce hospitalizations over a 5-year period compared with the current SOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"113-119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922182/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143663670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-07eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.130878
Gihan Elsisi, Hana Abdul Kareem, Abdelaziz Alaseiri, Abdullah Alsharm, Mohamed Al Garni, Hajer Al-Mudaiheem, Fouad Alnagar, Hazem Lotfy, Mohamed Ouda, Ahmed Elshehri
Introduction: In Saudi Arabia, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with wild-type RAS mutations may be treated with either cetuximab plus chemotherapy (CET + CT) or panitumumab plus chemotherapy (PAN + CT), which are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. This study calculated the costs of adverse event (AE) management linked to anti-EGFR treatment in Saudi Arabia's national health budget from payer and societal perspectives. Methods: An adaptation of a global model developed in Microsoft Excel® was performed to estimate the costs of AE management associated with the first-line treatment (CET + CT and PAN + CT) of RAS wild-type mCRC patients in Saudi healthcare settings. The frequencies of common and highly common AEs were sourced from the summaries of product characteristics of CET and PAN, whereas AE severity was captured from a meta-analysis. Unit costs in Saudi Riyal (SAR) were obtained from the National Guard of Health Affairs and Ministry of Health 2024 price lists. The model assumptions, inputs, and results were validated using a local Delphi panel. Results: Within the Saudi payer perspective model, treatment with CET + CT vs PAN + CT resulted in average population cost savings of SAR 9 246 133 (4 741 606 international dollars [Intl 10 421) for severe AEs, and average population cost savings of SAR 16 039 427 (Intl 18 077) for all-grade AEs. On the other hand, within the Saudi societal perspective model, treatment with CET + CT vs PAN + CT resulted in average population cost savings of SAR 11 386 314 (Intl
简介:在沙特阿拉伯,RAS野生型突变的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者可以使用西妥昔单抗联合化疗(CET + CT)或帕尼单抗联合化疗(PAN + CT)进行治疗,这两种药物都是表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抗体。本研究从支付方和社会角度计算了沙特阿拉伯国家卫生预算中与抗表皮生长因子受体治疗相关的不良事件(AE)管理成本。方法:对 Microsoft Excel® 中开发的全球模型进行了调整,以估算沙特医疗环境中 RAS 野生型 mCRC 患者一线治疗(CET + CT 和 PAN + CT)的相关 AE 管理成本。常见和高发 AE 的频率来自 CET 和 PAN 的产品特征概要,而 AE 的严重程度则来自一项荟萃分析。以沙特里亚尔(SAR)为单位的单位成本来自国家卫生事务卫队和卫生部 2024 年价目表。模型假设、输入和结果由当地德尔菲小组进行验证。结果:在沙特支付方视角模型中,使用 CET + CT 与 PAN + CT 相比,治疗严重 AE 的平均人群成本可节省 9 246 133 沙特里亚尔(4 741 606 美元 [Intl ]),而治疗严重 AE 的平均人群成本可节省 S A R 20 321(I n t l 10 421)、对于所有等级的急性呼吸道感染,平均每人可节省 16 039 427 里亚尔(8 225 347 英镑)的费用,平均每人可节省 35 251 里亚尔(18 077 英镑)的费用。另一方面,在沙特社会视角模型中,使用 CET + CT 与 PAN + CT 相比,治疗严重 AE 平均可节省 11 386 314 沙特里亚尔(5 839 135 英镑)的人口成本,而治疗严重 AE 平均可节省 S A R 25 025(12 833 英镑)的人口成本、同时,所有等级的急性呼吸道感染平均可节约 18 179 608 里亚尔(9 322 875 英镑)的人口成本和 39 955 里亚尔(20 489 英镑)的医疗费用。结论:在治疗未经治疗的 RAS 野生型 mCRC 患者时,CET + CT 方案的 AE 发生率低于 PAN + CT 方案,因此从沙特支付方和社会角度来看,都能节省 AE 管理成本。这些可观的成本节约可减轻沙特医疗机构对 mCRC 的经济负担。
{"title":"Costs of Adverse Event Management Associated with First-Line Cetuximab or Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Gihan Elsisi, Hana Abdul Kareem, Abdelaziz Alaseiri, Abdullah Alsharm, Mohamed Al Garni, Hajer Al-Mudaiheem, Fouad Alnagar, Hazem Lotfy, Mohamed Ouda, Ahmed Elshehri","doi":"10.36469/001c.130878","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.130878","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> In Saudi Arabia, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with wild-type RAS mutations may be treated with either cetuximab plus chemotherapy (CET + CT) or panitumumab plus chemotherapy (PAN + CT), which are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. This study calculated the costs of adverse event (AE) management linked to anti-EGFR treatment in Saudi Arabia's national health budget from payer and societal perspectives. <b>Methods:</b> An adaptation of a global model developed in Microsoft Excel® was performed to estimate the costs of AE management associated with the first-line treatment (CET + CT and PAN + CT) of RAS wild-type mCRC patients in Saudi healthcare settings. The frequencies of common and highly common AEs were sourced from the summaries of product characteristics of CET and PAN, whereas AE severity was captured from a meta-analysis. Unit costs in Saudi Riyal (SAR) were obtained from the National Guard of Health Affairs and Ministry of Health 2024 price lists. The model assumptions, inputs, and results were validated using a local Delphi panel. <b>Results:</b> Within the Saudi payer perspective model, treatment with CET + CT vs PAN + CT resulted in average population cost savings of SAR 9 246 133 (4 741 606 international dollars [Intl <math><mo>]</mo> <mo>)</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mn>20</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>321</mn> <mo>(</mo> <mi>I</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>l</mi></math> 10 421) for severe AEs, and average population cost savings of SAR 16 039 427 (Intl <math><mn>8</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>225</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>347</mn> <mo>)</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mn>35</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>251</mn> <mo>(</mo> <mi>I</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>l</mi></math> 18 077) for all-grade AEs. On the other hand, within the Saudi societal perspective model, treatment with CET + CT vs PAN + CT resulted in average population cost savings of SAR 11 386 314 (Intl <math><mn>5</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>839</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>135</mn> <mo>)</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"106-112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890290/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143586030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.129832
Daniel Samacá-Samacá, Antonio Robles, Hugo Ocampo, Francisco J Rodríguez, Carolina Sardi-Correa, Laura Prieto-Pinto, Christian Bührer, Camilo Tamayo, David Rodríguez, Mauricio Hernández-Quintana
<p><p><b>Background:</b> Retinal diseases are major contributors to disability, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) represent a significant disease and economic burden in Colombia. Assessing the economic evaluation of available treatments is essential for the efficient allocation of healthcare resources. <b>Objective:</b> To estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of using faricimab for the treatment of patients with DME and nAMD within the Colombian health system. <b>Methods:</b> This study used a 25-year Markov cohort model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of faricimab vs aflibercept, ranibizumab, and brolucizumab. We used the methodological guidelines of the local health technology assessment agency for conducting the cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis. Transition probabilities and injection frequencies were derived from the literature. Drug prices were retrieved from public local databases. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were assessed. The potential patient population for the budget impact analysis was estimated based on disease prevalence and expert consultations. <b>Results:</b> Faricimab treat-and-extend (T&E) was dominant vs aflibercept T&E (+0.22 QALYs), ranibizumab T&E (+0.55 QALYs), and brolucizumab for 8 to 12 weeks (+0.06 QALYs) in DME, generating cost savings (in US dollars) of <math><mn>3849</mn> <mo>,</mo></math> 1375, and <math><mn>2824</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>I</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>M</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mo>+</mo> <mn>0.12</mn> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>Y</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>z</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mo>+</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>Y</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>z</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mn>8</mn> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mn>12</mn> <mi>w</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>k</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mo>+</mo>
背景:视网膜疾病是导致残疾的主要原因,严重影响患者的生活质量。糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)和新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)是哥伦比亚的一个重要疾病和经济负担。评估现有治疗方法的经济评价对于有效分配医疗资源至关重要。目的:评估在哥伦比亚卫生系统内使用法利昔单抗治疗二甲醚和nAMD患者的成本效益和预算影响。方法:本研究采用25年Markov队列模型来评估faricimab与阿非利西贝、雷尼单抗和brolucizumab的成本-效果。我们使用当地卫生技术评估机构的方法指导方针进行成本效益和预算影响分析。过渡概率和注入频率由文献推导。药品价格从当地公共数据库检索。评估质量调整生命年(QALYs)。预算影响分析的潜在患者群体是根据患病率和专家咨询估计的。结果:Faricimab治疗延长(T&E)在DME治疗中占主导地位,而afliberept T&E (+0.22 QALYs)、ranibizumab T&E (+0.55 QALYs)和brolucizumab治疗8 - 12周(+0.06 QALYs),节省成本(以美元计)分别为3849、1375和2824。我n n M D, f r我c I M b l s o s h o w e D D o M I n n c e v s f l I b e r c e p t s n e e D e D (+ 0.12 Q l Y s), r n我b z u M b s n e e D e D (+ 0.05 Q l Y s), n D b r o l u c我z M b 8 t o 12 w e e k s (+ 0.12 Q l Y s) w我t h s v我n g s n(美国)7223,5792,6798 n D,分别。假设二甲醚的市场份额每年增长15%,nAMD的市场份额每年增长13%,那么哥伦比亚卫生系统可以在2011年节省1.44亿美元,而在2010年,哥伦比亚卫生系统可以节省3亿美元。其中,1.227亿美元归因于药品费用,2130万美元归因于医疗费用,其中1亿美元归因于医疗费用,1亿美元归因于医疗费用,1亿美元归因于医疗费用,1亿美元归因于医疗费用。结论:考虑到每个额外的QALY愿意支付5988美元的门槛,faricimab是哥伦比亚医疗保健系统中DME和nAMD的成本效益替代方案,显示出其他抗血管内皮生长因子药物的优势。与其他治疗方法相比,Faricimab以更低的成本提供了更好的健康结果。
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of the Use of Faricimab in Diabetic Macular Edema and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Colombia.","authors":"Daniel Samacá-Samacá, Antonio Robles, Hugo Ocampo, Francisco J Rodríguez, Carolina Sardi-Correa, Laura Prieto-Pinto, Christian Bührer, Camilo Tamayo, David Rodríguez, Mauricio Hernández-Quintana","doi":"10.36469/001c.129832","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.129832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Retinal diseases are major contributors to disability, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) represent a significant disease and economic burden in Colombia. Assessing the economic evaluation of available treatments is essential for the efficient allocation of healthcare resources. <b>Objective:</b> To estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of using faricimab for the treatment of patients with DME and nAMD within the Colombian health system. <b>Methods:</b> This study used a 25-year Markov cohort model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of faricimab vs aflibercept, ranibizumab, and brolucizumab. We used the methodological guidelines of the local health technology assessment agency for conducting the cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis. Transition probabilities and injection frequencies were derived from the literature. Drug prices were retrieved from public local databases. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were assessed. The potential patient population for the budget impact analysis was estimated based on disease prevalence and expert consultations. <b>Results:</b> Faricimab treat-and-extend (T&E) was dominant vs aflibercept T&E (+0.22 QALYs), ranibizumab T&E (+0.55 QALYs), and brolucizumab for 8 to 12 weeks (+0.06 QALYs) in DME, generating cost savings (in US dollars) of <math><mn>3849</mn> <mo>,</mo></math> 1375, and <math><mn>2824</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>I</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>M</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mo>+</mo> <mn>0.12</mn> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>Y</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>z</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mo>+</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>Y</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>z</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mn>8</mn> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mn>12</mn> <mi>w</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>k</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mo>+</mo>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"97-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884430/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143573246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The 2022 US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization eliminated the constitutional right to abortion and activated trigger laws in 21 states, either banning or significantly restricting abortion access. This study estimated changes in postpartum depression (PPD) diagnoses after Dobbs in states with trigger laws vs those without. Methods: Medicaid data from Kythera Labs spanning December 2019 to June 2024 were utilized. Difference-in-difference models assessed changes in PPD diagnosis rates post-Dobbs (21 trigger states, 29 non-trigger states). Results: Women in trigger states were younger (mean, 26.53 vs 27.98 years), more likely to reside in low socioeconomic status areas (41.28% vs 24.42%) and less likely to have obstetrical complications (66.06% vs 77.36%), maternal complications (16.41% vs 18.9%), and lifestyle risk factors (13.58% vs 21.17%). Baseline PPD diagnosis rates were 8.51% in trigger states and 12.66% in non-trigger states. Post-Dobbs, PPD diagnosis rates were 10.20% in trigger states and 14.34% in non-trigger states. Conclusions: Overall, women in states with abortion trigger laws experienced a small positive but statistically insignificant increase in PPD diagnoses following Dobbs compared with those in non-trigger states.
背景:2022 年美国最高法院在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案中的判决取消了宪法规定的堕胎权,并在 21 个州启动了触发法,禁止或大幅限制堕胎。本研究估计了在多布斯案之后,有触发法的州与没有触发法的州产后抑郁症(PPD)诊断率的变化。研究方法采用 Kythera 实验室提供的医疗补助数据,时间跨度为 2019 年 12 月至 2024 年 6 月。差异模型评估了多布斯事件后 PPD 诊断率的变化(21 个触发州,29 个非触发州)。结果:触发州的妇女更年轻(平均 26.53 岁 vs 27.98 岁),更有可能居住在社会经济地位较低的地区(41.28% vs 24.42%),不太可能出现产科并发症(66.06% vs 77.36%)、产妇并发症(16.41% vs 18.9%)和生活方式风险因素(13.58% vs 21.17%)。基线 PPD 诊断率在触发状态下为 8.51%,在非触发状态下为 12.66%。多布斯后,触发状态下的 PPD 诊断率为 10.20%,非触发状态下为 14.34%。结论:总体而言,与非触发州的妇女相比,触发堕胎法的州的妇女在多布斯事件后的 PPD 诊断率略有增加,但在统计学上并不显著。
{"title":"The Effect of <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> on Clinical Diagnosis of Postpartum Depression.","authors":"Onur Baser, Yuanqing Lu, Facundo Sepulveda, Ariani Alemzadeh, Amy Endrizal","doi":"10.36469/001c.129633","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.129633","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The 2022 US Supreme Court decision in <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> eliminated the constitutional right to abortion and activated trigger laws in 21 states, either banning or significantly restricting abortion access. This study estimated changes in postpartum depression (PPD) diagnoses after <i>Dobbs</i> in states with trigger laws vs those without. <b>Methods:</b> Medicaid data from Kythera Labs spanning December 2019 to June 2024 were utilized. Difference-in-difference models assessed changes in PPD diagnosis rates post-<i>Dobbs</i> (21 trigger states, 29 non-trigger states). <b>Results:</b> Women in trigger states were younger (mean, 26.53 vs 27.98 years), more likely to reside in low socioeconomic status areas (41.28% vs 24.42%) and less likely to have obstetrical complications (66.06% vs 77.36%), maternal complications (16.41% vs 18.9%), and lifestyle risk factors (13.58% vs 21.17%). Baseline PPD diagnosis rates were 8.51% in trigger states and 12.66% in non-trigger states. Post-<i>Dobbs</i>, PPD diagnosis rates were 10.20% in trigger states and 14.34% in non-trigger states. <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, women in states with abortion trigger laws experienced a small positive but statistically insignificant increase in PPD diagnoses following <i>Dobbs</i> compared with those in non-trigger states.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"86-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869945/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143541814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) and molnupiravir are oral antiviral drugs approved for the treatment of early symptomatic patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 at high risk of progression to severe disease in Japan. Objective: This study evaluated, from a Japanese payer perspective, the cost-effectiveness of NMV/r compared with molnupiravir among patients with COVID-19. Methods: This cost-effectiveness model describes the COVID-19 disease history and the impact of antiviral treatment on short-term and long-term outcomes. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was compared with molnupiravir, and in the scenario analysis NMV/r was compared with standard of care over a lifetime horizon. Results: When compared with molnupiravir, NMV/r showed higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (15.752 vs 15.739) and higher total cost (¥6 248 014 vs ¥6 245 829 [US 44 121.42]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was ¥164 934 (US 35 320.71/QALY]). In the scenario analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was ¥3 646 821 (US
背景:Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r)和molnupiravir是日本批准用于治疗轻至中度早期症状且进展为严重疾病高风险的COVID-19患者的口服抗病毒药物。目的:本研究从日本支付者的角度,评价NMV/r与莫诺匹拉韦在COVID-19患者中的成本-效果。方法:该成本-效果模型描述了COVID-19疾病史以及抗病毒治疗对短期和长期预后的影响。将Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir与molnupiravir进行比较,并在情景分析中将NMV/r与生命周期内的标准护理进行比较。结果:与莫诺匹拉韦相比,NMV/r具有更高的质量调整生命年(QALYs) (15.752 vs 15.739)和更高的总成本(6 248 014 vs 6 245 829 [US 44 136.86 vs s 44 121.42])。增量成本效益比率¥164 934(合1165.12)p e r L Y g i n e d w h i w c h s L o w e r t h n t h e w我L L n g n e s s - t o - p Y (w t p) t h r e s h o L d i n J p n(¥5 000 000 / Q L Y [U s 35 320.71 / QALY])。在情景分析中,增量成本-效果比为3 646 821日元(25 761.66美元)/ Q / A / L / d / d。O n e - w y s e n s我t v t y一个l n y s i s n d p r O b b我l s t c s e n s我t v t y一个l n y s i s s h O w e t h t n M v d s c O s t / r w - e f f e c t i v e c O M p r e d w i t h M O l n u p ir i r n d s t n d r d O f c r e c O n s i s t e n t l y。l l r e s u l t s o f o n e - w y s e n s我t v t y一个l n y s i s s h o w e d t h t t h e n c r e m e n t l c o s e t - f f e c t i v e n e s s r t i o s w e r e b e l o w t h e w t P t h r e s h o P l d i n J n。T h e r e s u l T o f T h e c o s e T - f f e c T i v e n e s s c c e p T b我l T y c u r e s h o w e d T h T T h e p r o b b我l T y T h T T h e n c r e m e n T l c o s e T - f f e c T i v e n e s s r T i o w s b e l o w T h e p w T o f¥5 000 000 / Q l y (u s 35 320.71 / QALY)为100.00%。结论:从日本支付者的角度来看,与莫努匹拉韦和标准护理相比,尼马特利韦/利托那韦具有成本效益。本研究为NMV/r治疗COVID-19患者的成本效益提供了证据。
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Compared with Molnupiravir in Patients at High Risk for Progression to Severe COVID-19 in Japan.","authors":"Akira Yuasa, Hiroyuki Matsuda, Yosuke Fujii, Tendai Mugwagwa, Yuki Kado, Mizuki Yoshida, Koichi Murata, Yoshiaki Gu","doi":"10.36469/001c.129067","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.129067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) and molnupiravir are oral antiviral drugs approved for the treatment of early symptomatic patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 at high risk of progression to severe disease in Japan. <b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated, from a Japanese payer perspective, the cost-effectiveness of NMV/r compared with molnupiravir among patients with COVID-19. <b>Methods:</b> This cost-effectiveness model describes the COVID-19 disease history and the impact of antiviral treatment on short-term and long-term outcomes. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was compared with molnupiravir, and in the scenario analysis NMV/r was compared with standard of care over a lifetime horizon. <b>Results:</b> When compared with molnupiravir, NMV/r showed higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (15.752 vs 15.739) and higher total cost (¥6 248 014 vs ¥6 245 829 [US <math><mn>44</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>136.86</mn> <mi>v</mi> <mi>s</mi></math> 44 121.42]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was ¥164 934 (US <math><mn>1165.12</mn> <mo>)</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>Y</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>W</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>J</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mrow><mo>¥</mo></mrow> <mn>5</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>000</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>000</mn> <mrow><mo>/</mo></mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>Y</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>U</mi> <mi>S</mi></math> 35 320.71/QALY]). In the scenario analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was ¥3 646 821 (US <math><mn>25</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>761.66</mn> <mo>)</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>Y</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>O</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>i</","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"75-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864595/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143516031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}