首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research最新文献

英文 中文
Outcomes for Dostarlimab and Real-World Treatments in Post-platinum Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: The GARNET Trial Versus a US Electronic Health Record-Based External Control Arm 多斯塔利单抗和真实世界治疗在铂后晚期/复发子宫内膜癌患者中的结果:GARNET试验与基于美国电子健康记录的外部控制臂
Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2023.77484
Scott Goulden, Qin Shen, Robert Coleman, Cara Mathews, Matthias Hunger, Ankit Pahwa, Rene Schade
Background: Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) have limited treatment options following platinum-based chemotherapy and poor prognosis. The single-arm, Phase I GARNET trial (NCT02715284) previously reported dostarlimab efficacy in mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability–high advanced or recurrent EC. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) and describe time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for dostarlimab (GARNET Cohort A1 safety population) with an equivalent real-world external control arm receiving non-anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1/2 treatments (constructed using data from a nationwide electronic health record–derived de-identified database and applied GARNET eligibility criteria). Methods: Propensity scores constructed from prognostic factors, identified by literature review and clinical experts, were used for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed and OS/TTD was estimated (Cox regression model was used to estimate the OS-adjusted hazard ratio). Results: Dostarlimab was associated with a 52% lower risk of death vs real-world treatments (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.66). IPTW-adjusted median OS for dostarlimab (N=143) was not estimable (95% CI, 19.4–not estimable) versus 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.9) for real-world treatments (N = 185). Median TTD was 11.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-38.7) for dostarlimab and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.0) for the real-world cohort. Discussion: Consistent with previous analyses, patients treated with dostarlimab had significantly longer OS than patients in the US real-world cohort after adjusting for the lack of randomization using stabilized IPTW. Additionally, patients had a long TTD when treated with dostarlimab, suggesting a favorable tolerability profile. Conclusion: Patients with advanced or recurrent EC receiving dostarlimab in GARNET had significantly lower risk of death than those receiving real-world non-anti-PD-(L)1/2 treatments.
背景:晚期或复发子宫内膜癌(EC)患者在铂基化疗后治疗选择有限,预后较差。单臂I期GARNET试验(NCT02715284)先前报道了dostarlimumab对错配修复缺陷/微卫星不稳定性-高度晚期或复发性EC的疗效。目的:本研究的目的是比较dostarlimumab (GARNET A1队列安全人群)与接受非抗程序性死亡(PD)-1/PD配体(L)1/2治疗的等效现实世界外部对照组的总生存期(OS)和描述治疗停止时间(TTD)(使用来自全国电子健康记录衍生的去识别数据库的数据构建,并应用GARNET资格标准)。方法:根据文献回顾和临床专家确定的预后因素构建倾向评分,用于治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)。构建Kaplan-Meier曲线,估计OS/TTD(采用Cox回归模型估计OS校正后的风险比)。结果:与现实治疗相比,dostarlimumab与52%的死亡风险降低相关(风险比,0.48;95%可信区间[CI], 0.35-0.66)。dostarlimumab经iptws调整后的中位OS (N=143)不可估计(95% CI, 19.4 -不可估计),而现实世界治疗(N= 185)的中位OS为13.1个月(95% CI, 8.3-15.9)。dostarlimumab组的中位TTD为11.7个月(95% CI, 6.0-38.7),真实队列组的中位TTD为5.3个月(95% CI, 4.1-6.0)。讨论:与先前的分析一致,在使用稳定IPTW调整缺乏随机化后,接受dostarlimab治疗的患者的生存期明显长于美国现实世界队列中的患者。此外,患者在接受多司达单抗治疗时,TTD时间较长,这表明患者具有良好的耐受性。结论:晚期或复发性EC患者在GARNET中接受dostarlimumab治疗的死亡风险明显低于接受现实世界非抗pd -(L)1/2治疗的患者。
{"title":"Outcomes for Dostarlimab and Real-World Treatments in Post-platinum Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: The GARNET Trial Versus a US Electronic Health Record-Based External Control Arm","authors":"Scott Goulden, Qin Shen, Robert Coleman, Cara Mathews, Matthias Hunger, Ankit Pahwa, Rene Schade","doi":"10.36469/jheor.2023.77484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2023.77484","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) have limited treatment options following platinum-based chemotherapy and poor prognosis. The single-arm, Phase I GARNET trial (NCT02715284) previously reported dostarlimab efficacy in mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability–high advanced or recurrent EC. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) and describe time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for dostarlimab (GARNET Cohort A1 safety population) with an equivalent real-world external control arm receiving non-anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1/2 treatments (constructed using data from a nationwide electronic health record–derived de-identified database and applied GARNET eligibility criteria). Methods: Propensity scores constructed from prognostic factors, identified by literature review and clinical experts, were used for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed and OS/TTD was estimated (Cox regression model was used to estimate the OS-adjusted hazard ratio). Results: Dostarlimab was associated with a 52% lower risk of death vs real-world treatments (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.66). IPTW-adjusted median OS for dostarlimab (N=143) was not estimable (95% CI, 19.4–not estimable) versus 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.9) for real-world treatments (N = 185). Median TTD was 11.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-38.7) for dostarlimab and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.0) for the real-world cohort. Discussion: Consistent with previous analyses, patients treated with dostarlimab had significantly longer OS than patients in the US real-world cohort after adjusting for the lack of randomization using stabilized IPTW. Additionally, patients had a long TTD when treated with dostarlimab, suggesting a favorable tolerability profile. Conclusion: Patients with advanced or recurrent EC receiving dostarlimab in GARNET had significantly lower risk of death than those receiving real-world non-anti-PD-(L)1/2 treatments.","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136361220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes for Dostarlimab and Real-World Treatments in Post-platinum Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: The GARNET Trial Versus a US Electronic Health Record-Based External Control Arm. 铂后晚期/复发性子宫内膜癌患者接受多斯他利单抗和真实世界治疗的结果:GARNET试验与基于美国电子健康记录的外部对照组的对比。
Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-09-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.36469/001c.77484
Scott Goulden, Qin Shen, Robert L Coleman, Cara Mathews, Matthias Hunger, Ankit Pahwa, Rene Schade

Background: Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) have limited treatment options following platinum-based chemotherapy and poor prognosis. The single-arm, Phase I GARNET trial (NCT02715284) previously reported dostarlimab efficacy in mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high advanced or recurrent EC. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) and describe time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for dostarlimab (GARNET Cohort A1 safety population) with an equivalent real-world external control arm receiving non-anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1/2 treatments (constructed using data from a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database and applied GARNET eligibility criteria). Methods: Propensity scores constructed from prognostic factors, identified by literature review and clinical experts, were used for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed and OS/TTD was estimated (Cox regression model was used to estimate the OS-adjusted hazard ratio). Results: Dostarlimab was associated with a 52% lower risk of death vs real-world treatments (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.66). IPTW-adjusted median OS for dostarlimab (N=143) was not estimable (95% CI, 19.4-not estimable) versus 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.9) for real-world treatments (N = 185). Median TTD was 11.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-38.7) for dostarlimab and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.0) for the real-world cohort. Discussion: Consistent with previous analyses, patients treated with dostarlimab had significantly longer OS than patients in the US real-world cohort after adjusting for the lack of randomization using stabilized IPTW. Additionally, patients had a long TTD when treated with dostarlimab, suggesting a favorable tolerability profile. Conclusion: Patients with advanced or recurrent EC receiving dostarlimab in GARNET had significantly lower risk of death than those receiving real-world non-anti-PD-(L)1/2 treatments.

背景:晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌(EC)患者在铂类化疗后的治疗选择有限,且预后较差。单臂 I 期 GARNET 试验(NCT02715284)曾报道了多司他利单抗对错配修复缺陷/微卫星不稳定性高的晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌的疗效。研究目的本研究旨在比较多司他利单抗(GARNET队列A1安全人群)与接受非抗程序性死亡(PD)-1/PD配体(L)1/2治疗的等效真实世界外部对照组的总生存期(OS),并描述治疗终止时间(TTD)(使用来自全国性电子健康记录的去身份化数据库的数据并应用GARNET资格标准构建)。方法:根据文献综述和临床专家确定的预后因素构建倾向分数,用于反向治疗概率加权(IPTW)。构建 Kaplan-Meier 曲线并估算 OS/TTD (使用 Cox 回归模型估算 OS 调整后的危险比)。结果与真实世界的治疗相比,多斯他利单抗的死亡风险降低了52%(危险比为0.48;95%置信区间[CI]为0.35-0.66)。多司他利单抗(N=143)的IPTW调整后中位OS无法估计(95% CI,19.4-无法估计),而实际治疗(N=185)的中位OS为13.1个月(95% CI,8.3-15.9)。多司他利单抗的中位TTD为11.7个月(95% CI,6.0-38.7),而真实世界队列的中位TTD为5.3个月(95% CI,4.1-6.0)。讨论情况与之前的分析一致,在使用稳定的IPTW调整随机化的缺失后,接受多司他利单抗治疗的患者的OS明显长于美国真实世界队列中的患者。此外,接受多司他利单抗治疗的患者TTD较长,这表明多司他利单抗具有良好的耐受性。结论在GARNET中接受多司他利单抗治疗的晚期或复发性EC患者的死亡风险明显低于接受真实世界非抗PD-(L)1/2治疗的患者。
{"title":"Outcomes for Dostarlimab and Real-World Treatments in Post-platinum Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: The GARNET Trial Versus a US Electronic Health Record-Based External Control Arm.","authors":"Scott Goulden, Qin Shen, Robert L Coleman, Cara Mathews, Matthias Hunger, Ankit Pahwa, Rene Schade","doi":"10.36469/001c.77484","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.77484","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) have limited treatment options following platinum-based chemotherapy and poor prognosis. The single-arm, Phase I GARNET trial (NCT02715284) previously reported dostarlimab efficacy in mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high advanced or recurrent EC. <b>Objectives:</b> The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) and describe time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for dostarlimab (GARNET Cohort A1 safety population) with an equivalent real-world external control arm receiving non-anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1/2 treatments (constructed using data from a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database and applied GARNET eligibility criteria). <b>Methods:</b> Propensity scores constructed from prognostic factors, identified by literature review and clinical experts, were used for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed and OS/TTD was estimated (Cox regression model was used to estimate the OS-adjusted hazard ratio). <b>Results:</b> Dostarlimab was associated with a 52% lower risk of death vs real-world treatments (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.66). IPTW-adjusted median OS for dostarlimab (N=143) was not estimable (95% CI, 19.4-not estimable) versus 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.9) for real-world treatments (N = 185). Median TTD was 11.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-38.7) for dostarlimab and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.0) for the real-world cohort. <b>Discussion:</b> Consistent with previous analyses, patients treated with dostarlimab had significantly longer OS than patients in the US real-world cohort after adjusting for the lack of randomization using stabilized IPTW. Additionally, patients had a long TTD when treated with dostarlimab, suggesting a favorable tolerability profile. <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients with advanced or recurrent EC receiving dostarlimab in GARNET had significantly lower risk of death than those receiving real-world non-anti-PD-(L)1/2 treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10589111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of Open Claims vs Closed Claims in Health Outcomes Research. 开放声明与封闭声明在健康结果研究中的应用。
IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-09-05 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.36469/001c.87538
Onur Baser, Gabriela Samayoa, Nehir Yapar, Erdem Baser, Fatih Mete

Background: Closed claims are frequently used in outcomes research studies. Lately, the availability of open claims has increased the possibility of obtaining information faster and on a larger scale. However, because of the possibility of missing claims and duplications, these data sets have not been highly utilized in medical research. Objective: To compare frequently used healthcare utilization measures between closed claims and open claims to analyze if the possibility of missing claims in open claims data creates a downward bias in the estimates. Methods: We identified 18 different diseases using 2022 data from 2 closed claims data sets (MarketScan® and PharMetrics® Plus) and 1 open claims database (Kythera). After applying an algorithm that removes possible duplications from open claims data, we compared healthcare utilizations such as inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient use and length of stay among these 3 data sets. We applied standardized differences to compare the medians for each outcome. Results: The sample size of the open claims data sets was 10 to 65 times larger than closed claims data sets depending on disease type. For each disease, the estimates of healthcare utilization were similar between the open claims and closed claims data. The difference was statistically insignificant. Conclusions: Open claims data with a bigger sample size and more current available information provide essential advantages for healthcare outcomes research studies. Therefore, especially for new medications and rare diseases, open claims data can provide information much earlier than closed claims, which usually have a time lag of 6 to 8 months.

背景:封闭式索赔经常用于结果研究。最近,公开索赔的可用性增加了更快、更大规模地获取信息的可能性。然而,由于索赔可能缺失和重复,这些数据集在医学研究中没有得到充分利用。目的:比较已结案索赔和未结案索赔之间常用的医疗保健利用率指标,以分析未结案索赔数据中遗漏索赔的可能性是否会造成估计值的向下偏差。方法:我们使用来自2个封闭索赔数据集(MarketScan®和PharMetrics®Plus)和1个开放索赔数据库(Kythera)的2022年数据,确定了18种不同的疾病。在应用了一种从开放索赔数据中消除可能重复的算法后,我们比较了这3个数据集的医疗利用率,如住院、急诊和门诊使用率以及住院时间。我们采用标准化差异来比较每种结果的中位数。结果:根据疾病类型,开放索赔数据集的样本量是封闭索赔数据集样本量的10到65倍。对于每种疾病,公开索赔和非公开索赔数据对医疗利用率的估计是相似的。这一差异在统计学上并不显著。结论:具有更大样本量和更多最新可用信息的开放索赔数据为医疗保健结果研究提供了基本优势。因此,特别是对于新药和罕见病,公开索赔数据可以比封闭索赔更早地提供信息,封闭索赔通常有6到8个月的时间滞后。
{"title":"Use of Open Claims vs Closed Claims in Health Outcomes Research.","authors":"Onur Baser, Gabriela Samayoa, Nehir Yapar, Erdem Baser, Fatih Mete","doi":"10.36469/001c.87538","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.87538","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Closed claims are frequently used in outcomes research studies. Lately, the availability of open claims has increased the possibility of obtaining information faster and on a larger scale. However, because of the possibility of missing claims and duplications, these data sets have not been highly utilized in medical research. <b>Objective:</b> To compare frequently used healthcare utilization measures between closed claims and open claims to analyze if the possibility of missing claims in open claims data creates a downward bias in the estimates. <b>Methods:</b> We identified 18 different diseases using 2022 data from 2 closed claims data sets (MarketScan® and PharMetrics® Plus) and 1 open claims database (Kythera). After applying an algorithm that removes possible duplications from open claims data, we compared healthcare utilizations such as inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient use and length of stay among these 3 data sets. We applied standardized differences to compare the medians for each outcome. <b>Results:</b> The sample size of the open claims data sets was 10 to 65 times larger than closed claims data sets depending on disease type. For each disease, the estimates of healthcare utilization were similar between the open claims and closed claims data. The difference was statistically insignificant. <b>Conclusions:</b> Open claims data with a bigger sample size and more current available information provide essential advantages for healthcare outcomes research studies. Therefore, especially for new medications and rare diseases, open claims data can provide information much earlier than closed claims, which usually have a time lag of 6 to 8 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"44-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484335/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10212661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of Open Claims vs Closed Claims in Health Outcomes Research 开放式索赔与封闭式索赔在健康结果研究中的应用
Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2023.87538
Onur Baser, Gabriela Samayoa, Nehir Yapar, Erdem Baser, Fatih Mete
Background: Closed claims are frequently used in outcomes research studies. Lately, the availability of open claims has increased the possibility of obtaining information faster and on a larger scale. However, because of the possibility of missing claims and duplications, these data sets have not been highly utilized in medical research. Objective: To compare frequently used healthcare utilization measures between closed claims and open claims to analyze if the possibility of missing claims in open claims data creates a downward bias in the estimates. Methods: We identified 18 different diseases using 2022 data from 2 closed claims data sets (MarketScan® and PharMetrics® Plus) and 1 open claims database (Kythera). After applying an algorithm that removes possible duplications from open claims data, we compared healthcare utilizations such as inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient use and length of stay among these 3 data sets. We applied standardized differences to compare the medians for each outcome. Results: The sample size of the open claims data sets was 10 to 65 times larger than closed claims data sets depending on disease type. For each disease, the estimates of healthcare utilization were similar between the open claims and closed claims data. The difference was statistically insignificant. Conclusions: Open claims data with a bigger sample size and more current available information provide essential advantages for healthcare outcomes research studies. Therefore, especially for new medications and rare diseases, open claims data can provide information much earlier than closed claims, which usually have a time lag of 6 to 8 months.
背景:封闭式索赔常用于结果研究。最近,公开索赔的可得性增加了更快更大规模地获得信息的可能性。然而,由于可能出现索赔缺失和重复,这些数据集在医学研究中没有得到充分利用。目的:比较封闭索赔和开放索赔之间常用的医疗保健利用措施,以分析开放索赔数据中缺失索赔的可能性是否会导致估计中的向下偏差。方法:我们使用来自2个封闭索赔数据集(MarketScan®和PharMetrics®Plus)和1个开放索赔数据库(Kythera)的2022个数据,确定了18种不同的疾病。在应用一种算法从公开索赔数据中删除可能的重复后,我们比较了这3个数据集的医疗保健利用情况,如住院、急诊和门诊的使用情况和住院时间。我们应用标准化差异来比较每个结果的中位数。结果:根据疾病类型,开放索赔数据集的样本量比封闭索赔数据集大10 ~ 65倍。对于每种疾病,公开索赔和封闭索赔数据之间的医疗保健利用估计是相似的。差异在统计上不显著。结论:具有更大样本量和更多当前可用信息的公开索赔数据为医疗保健结果研究提供了必不可少的优势。因此,特别是对于新药和罕见疾病,公开索赔数据可以比封闭索赔更早地提供信息,后者通常有6至8个月的时间滞后。
{"title":"Use of Open Claims vs Closed Claims in Health Outcomes Research","authors":"Onur Baser, Gabriela Samayoa, Nehir Yapar, Erdem Baser, Fatih Mete","doi":"10.36469/jheor.2023.87538","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2023.87538","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Closed claims are frequently used in outcomes research studies. Lately, the availability of open claims has increased the possibility of obtaining information faster and on a larger scale. However, because of the possibility of missing claims and duplications, these data sets have not been highly utilized in medical research. Objective: To compare frequently used healthcare utilization measures between closed claims and open claims to analyze if the possibility of missing claims in open claims data creates a downward bias in the estimates. Methods: We identified 18 different diseases using 2022 data from 2 closed claims data sets (MarketScan® and PharMetrics® Plus) and 1 open claims database (Kythera). After applying an algorithm that removes possible duplications from open claims data, we compared healthcare utilizations such as inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient use and length of stay among these 3 data sets. We applied standardized differences to compare the medians for each outcome. Results: The sample size of the open claims data sets was 10 to 65 times larger than closed claims data sets depending on disease type. For each disease, the estimates of healthcare utilization were similar between the open claims and closed claims data. The difference was statistically insignificant. Conclusions: Open claims data with a bigger sample size and more current available information provide essential advantages for healthcare outcomes research studies. Therefore, especially for new medications and rare diseases, open claims data can provide information much earlier than closed claims, which usually have a time lag of 6 to 8 months.","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135320337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health Economic Analysis of Two-Layer Bandage System for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency 双层绷带系统治疗慢性静脉功能不全的卫生经济学分析
Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2023.82159
Peter Mallow
Background: Compression therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Two-layer bandage (2LB) systems have been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. Objective: To estimate the total cost per response (CPR) for the resolution of edema and wounds in patients with CVI treated with a 2LB system as part of their overall wound healing regimen. Methods: A probabilistic decision tree model was developed to estimate the incremental CPR for a 2LB system. The model simulated 10 000 patients to estimate the CPR for the resolution of edema and wound healing. The analysis was performed using clinical data from a published single-arm, multicenter prospective study of CVI indicated for compression therapy. The response outcomes of interest were resolution of edema and rate of wound healing. The follow-up time was a maximum of 6 weeks, and the perspective of the study was a US outpatient treatment center. Economic data for compression therapy were based on the public prices of a 2LB system. Dressing changes occurred per manufacturer instructions for use. Results: The study comprised 702 patients (56% female), with a total of 414 wounds. The median duration of the wounds was 42 days, and the median size at the initial visit was 3.5 cm2. The average pain reduction fell by 67% using a visual analog score. Bandages were typically changed once or twice a week (51.7%). Wound healing occurred in 128 of the 414 wounds (30.9%). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the resolution of edema was $65.67 (range, $16.67-$124.32). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the healing of a wound was $138.71 (range, $35.71-$273.53). Conclusion: This economic evaluation complements previous clinical effectiveness and safety studies of 2LB systems for the treatment of CVI. The results demonstrate that the costs of incorporating 2LB into standard wound-healing protocols are negligible compared with overall treatment costs. Two-layer bandages may be considered a cost-effective first-line system for the treatment of wounds caused by CVI.
背景:压迫疗法是治疗慢性静脉功能不全(CVI)的金标准。双层绷带(2LB)系统已被证明是一种安全有效的治疗选择。目的:评估2LB系统作为CVI患者整体伤口愈合方案的一部分治疗水肿和伤口的每次缓解总成本(CPR)。方法:采用概率决策树模型估计2LB系统的增量CPR。该模型模拟了1万例患者,以估计心肺复苏术对水肿和伤口愈合的解决效果。该分析是根据一项已发表的单臂、多中心前瞻性CVI临床数据进行的,该研究表明CVI需要进行压迫治疗。我们感兴趣的反应结果是水肿的消退和伤口愈合的速度。随访时间最长为6周,研究视角为美国门诊治疗中心。压缩疗法的经济数据基于2LB系统的公开价格。根据制造商的使用说明进行敷料更换。结果:本研究纳入702例患者(56%为女性),共414处伤口。伤口的中位持续时间为42天,初次就诊时的中位面积为3.5平方厘米。使用视觉模拟评分,疼痛平均减轻了67%。通常每周更换1 - 2次绷带(51.7%)。414例创面中有128例创面愈合(30.9%)。2LB系统解决水肿的预期增量CPR费用为65.67美元(范围16.67- 124.32美元)。2LB系统对伤口愈合的预期增量CPR为138.71美元(范围35.71- 273.53美元)。结论:这项经济评估补充了之前2LB系统治疗CVI的临床有效性和安全性研究。结果表明,与总体治疗成本相比,将2LB纳入标准伤口愈合方案的成本可以忽略不计。双层绷带可能被认为是治疗CVI引起的伤口的一种具有成本效益的一线系统。
{"title":"Health Economic Analysis of Two-Layer Bandage System for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency","authors":"Peter Mallow","doi":"10.36469/jheor.2023.82159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2023.82159","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Compression therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Two-layer bandage (2LB) systems have been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. Objective: To estimate the total cost per response (CPR) for the resolution of edema and wounds in patients with CVI treated with a 2LB system as part of their overall wound healing regimen. Methods: A probabilistic decision tree model was developed to estimate the incremental CPR for a 2LB system. The model simulated 10 000 patients to estimate the CPR for the resolution of edema and wound healing. The analysis was performed using clinical data from a published single-arm, multicenter prospective study of CVI indicated for compression therapy. The response outcomes of interest were resolution of edema and rate of wound healing. The follow-up time was a maximum of 6 weeks, and the perspective of the study was a US outpatient treatment center. Economic data for compression therapy were based on the public prices of a 2LB system. Dressing changes occurred per manufacturer instructions for use. Results: The study comprised 702 patients (56% female), with a total of 414 wounds. The median duration of the wounds was 42 days, and the median size at the initial visit was 3.5 cm2. The average pain reduction fell by 67% using a visual analog score. Bandages were typically changed once or twice a week (51.7%). Wound healing occurred in 128 of the 414 wounds (30.9%). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the resolution of edema was $65.67 (range, $16.67-$124.32). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the healing of a wound was $138.71 (range, $35.71-$273.53). Conclusion: This economic evaluation complements previous clinical effectiveness and safety studies of 2LB systems for the treatment of CVI. The results demonstrate that the costs of incorporating 2LB into standard wound-healing protocols are negligible compared with overall treatment costs. Two-layer bandages may be considered a cost-effective first-line system for the treatment of wounds caused by CVI.","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135286026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health Economic Analysis of Two-Layer Bandage System for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency. 双层包扎系统治疗慢性静脉功能不全的健康经济分析。
IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-08-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.36469/001c.82159
Peter J Mallow

Background: Compression therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Two-layer bandage (2LB) systems have been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. Objective: To estimate the total cost per response (CPR) for the resolution of edema and wounds in patients with CVI treated with a 2LB system as part of their overall wound healing regimen. Methods: A probabilistic decision tree model was developed to estimate the incremental CPR for a 2LB system. The model simulated 10 000 patients to estimate the CPR for the resolution of edema and wound healing. The analysis was performed using clinical data from a published single-arm, multicenter prospective study of CVI indicated for compression therapy. The response outcomes of interest were resolution of edema and rate of wound healing. The follow-up time was a maximum of 6 weeks, and the perspective of the study was a US outpatient treatment center. Economic data for compression therapy were based on the public prices of a 2LB system. Dressing changes occurred per manufacturer instructions for use. Results: The study comprised 702 patients (56% female), with a total of 414 wounds. The median duration of the wounds was 42 days, and the median size at the initial visit was 3.5 cm2. The average pain reduction fell by 67% using a visual analog score. Bandages were typically changed once or twice a week (51.7%). Wound healing occurred in 128 of the 414 wounds (30.9%). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the resolution of edema was $65.67 (range, $16.67-$124.32). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the healing of a wound was $138.71 (range, $35.71-$273.53). Conclusion: This economic evaluation complements previous clinical effectiveness and safety studies of 2LB systems for the treatment of CVI. The results demonstrate that the costs of incorporating 2LB into standard wound-healing protocols are negligible compared with overall treatment costs. Two-layer bandages may be considered a cost-effective first-line system for the treatment of wounds caused by CVI.

背景:压迫疗法是治疗慢性静脉功能不全(CVI)的金标准。双层绷带(2LB)系统已被证明是一种安全有效的治疗选择。目的:作为整体伤口愈合方案的一部分,评估用2LB系统治疗CVI患者水肿和伤口的每次反应总成本(CPR)。方法:建立概率决策树模型来估计2LB系统的增量CPR。该模型模拟了10 000名患者,以估计用于水肿和伤口愈合的CPR。该分析使用了一项已发表的用于压迫治疗的CVI单臂、多中心前瞻性研究的临床数据。感兴趣的反应结果是水肿的消退和伤口愈合率。随访时间最长为6周,研究对象为美国门诊治疗中心。压缩治疗的经济数据基于2LB系统的公开价格。按照制造商的使用说明更换了敷料。结果:该研究包括702名患者(56%为女性),共414处伤口。伤口的中位持续时间为42天,初次就诊时的中位大小为3.5 cm2。使用视觉模拟评分,疼痛的平均减轻程度下降了67%。绷带通常每周更换一到两次(51.7%)。414个伤口中有128个伤口愈合(30.9%)。2LB系统用于解决水肿的预期增量CPR为65.67美元(范围16.67美元至124.32美元)。2L B系统用于伤口愈合的预期增量心肺复苏为138.71美元(范围35.71美元至273.53美元)。结论:本经济评估补充了之前的评估2LB系统治疗CVI的临床有效性和安全性研究。结果表明,与整体治疗成本相比,将2LB纳入标准伤口愈合方案的成本可以忽略不计。双层绷带可以被认为是治疗CVI引起的伤口的具有成本效益的一线系统。
{"title":"Health Economic Analysis of Two-Layer Bandage System for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency.","authors":"Peter J Mallow","doi":"10.36469/001c.82159","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.82159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Compression therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Two-layer bandage (2LB) systems have been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. <b>Objective:</b> To estimate the total cost per response (CPR) for the resolution of edema and wounds in patients with CVI treated with a 2LB system as part of their overall wound healing regimen. <b>Methods:</b> A probabilistic decision tree model was developed to estimate the incremental CPR for a 2LB system. The model simulated 10 000 patients to estimate the CPR for the resolution of edema and wound healing. The analysis was performed using clinical data from a published single-arm, multicenter prospective study of CVI indicated for compression therapy. The response outcomes of interest were resolution of edema and rate of wound healing. The follow-up time was a maximum of 6 weeks, and the perspective of the study was a US outpatient treatment center. Economic data for compression therapy were based on the public prices of a 2LB system. Dressing changes occurred per manufacturer instructions for use. <b>Results:</b> The study comprised 702 patients (56% female), with a total of 414 wounds. The median duration of the wounds was 42 days, and the median size at the initial visit was 3.5 cm2. The average pain reduction fell by 67% using a visual analog score. Bandages were typically changed once or twice a week (51.7%). Wound healing occurred in 128 of the 414 wounds (30.9%). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the resolution of edema was $65.67 (range, $16.67-$124.32). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the healing of a wound was $138.71 (range, $35.71-$273.53). <b>Conclusion:</b> This economic evaluation complements previous clinical effectiveness and safety studies of 2LB systems for the treatment of CVI. The results demonstrate that the costs of incorporating 2LB into standard wound-healing protocols are negligible compared with overall treatment costs. Two-layer bandages may be considered a cost-effective first-line system for the treatment of wounds caused by CVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10207482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a Conceptual Model to Understand Disease Burden in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Organ Damage. 开发一个概念模型来理解系统性红斑狼疮和器官损伤患者的疾病负担。
Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-08-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.36469/001c.82228
Lynne Broderick, Wen-Hung Chen, Roger A Levy, April Mitchell Foster, Cindy Umanzor Figueroa, Kerry Gairy, Deven Chauhan

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can lead to irreversible organ damage (OD). Data describing the patient burden of OD, as compared with SLE without OD, are limited. Objective: To develop a comprehensive conceptual model describing the burden experienced by patients living with SLE-associated OD. Methods: There were three phases to this qualitative study. First, a targeted literature review was conducted to inform a draft conceptual model. Second, key opinion leaders (KOLs) were interviewed to assess the draft conceptual model and help shape patient interview materials. Third, patients of different demographic backgrounds from across the United States were interviewed individually to gather their perspectives on living with SLE-associated OD. Data from concept elicitation interviews with KOLs and patients were coded and analyzed using NVivo software to identify the key concepts of the overall patient burden of SLE-associated OD. Findings from the KOL and patient interviews were used to finalize the conceptual model. Results: KOLs highlighted that SLE-associated OD carried a higher rate of mortality than SLE alone. Participants with SLE-associated OD (n = 40) experienced detrimental impacts across 4 areas of their lives: physical, cognitive, psychosocial functioning, and economic and work-related well-being. Physical impacts were described by all participants, often affecting their ability to perform everyday tasks. Many also described deterioration of cognitive functioning. Almost all participants experienced emotional impacts and challenges to their relationships and social lives resulting from living with SLE-associated OD. Additionally, SLE-associated OD imposed an economic burden including increased healthcare costs. SLE-associated OD had a more severe and debilitating impact on all aspects of the patient's quality of life than SLE prior to OD development, including further limitations in activities of daily living after the development of OD. Discussion: Study findings guided the development of a comprehensive conceptual model that fully represents the patient experience of living with SLE-associated OD, highlighting the additional burden of OD when compared with SLE alone. Conclusions: The conceptual model will inform improvements in disease management, which may result in better patient outcomes and aid development of clinical outcome assessments of disease burden.

背景:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种可导致不可逆器官损伤(OD)的慢性自身免疫性疾病。与没有OD的SLE相比,描述OD患者负担的数据是有限的。目的:建立一个全面的概念模型,描述SLE相关OD患者的负担。方法:本研究分为三个阶段。首先,进行了有针对性的文献综述,为概念模型草案提供信息。其次,对关键意见领袖(KOL)进行访谈,以评估概念模型草案并帮助形成患者访谈材料。第三,对来自美国各地的不同人口背景的患者进行了单独采访,以收集他们对SLE相关OD患者的看法。使用NVivo软件对KOL和患者的概念启发访谈数据进行编码和分析,以确定SLE相关OD的总体患者负担的关键概念。KOL和患者访谈的结果用于最终确定概念模型。结果:KOLs显示SLE相关OD的死亡率高于单独SLE。SLE相关OD(n = 40)在其生活的四个领域经历了有害影响:身体、认知、心理社会功能以及经济和工作幸福。所有参与者都描述了身体影响,通常会影响他们执行日常任务的能力。许多人还描述了认知功能的恶化。几乎所有参与者都经历了SLE相关OD对他们的人际关系和社交生活的情感影响和挑战。此外,SLE相关的OD带来了经济负担,包括医疗费用的增加。与OD发展前的SLE相比,SLE相关的OD对患者生活质量的各个方面都有更严重和更衰弱的影响,包括OD发展后日常生活活动的进一步限制。讨论:研究结果指导了一个全面的概念模型的开发,该模型充分代表了SLE相关OD患者的生活体验,强调了与单独SLE相比OD的额外负担。结论:该概念模型将为疾病管理的改进提供信息,这可能会导致更好的患者结果,并有助于制定疾病负担的临床结果评估。
{"title":"Development of a Conceptual Model to Understand Disease Burden in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Organ Damage.","authors":"Lynne Broderick, Wen-Hung Chen, Roger A Levy, April Mitchell Foster, Cindy Umanzor Figueroa, Kerry Gairy, Deven Chauhan","doi":"10.36469/001c.82228","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.82228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can lead to irreversible organ damage (OD). Data describing the patient burden of OD, as compared with SLE without OD, are limited. <b>Objective:</b> To develop a comprehensive conceptual model describing the burden experienced by patients living with SLE-associated OD. <b>Methods:</b> There were three phases to this qualitative study. First, a targeted literature review was conducted to inform a draft conceptual model. Second, key opinion leaders (KOLs) were interviewed to assess the draft conceptual model and help shape patient interview materials. Third, patients of different demographic backgrounds from across the United States were interviewed individually to gather their perspectives on living with SLE-associated OD. Data from concept elicitation interviews with KOLs and patients were coded and analyzed using NVivo software to identify the key concepts of the overall patient burden of SLE-associated OD. Findings from the KOL and patient interviews were used to finalize the conceptual model. <b>Results:</b> KOLs highlighted that SLE-associated OD carried a higher rate of mortality than SLE alone. Participants with SLE-associated OD (n = 40) experienced detrimental impacts across 4 areas of their lives: physical, cognitive, psychosocial functioning, and economic and work-related well-being. Physical impacts were described by all participants, often affecting their ability to perform everyday tasks. Many also described deterioration of cognitive functioning. Almost all participants experienced emotional impacts and challenges to their relationships and social lives resulting from living with SLE-associated OD. Additionally, SLE-associated OD imposed an economic burden including increased healthcare costs. SLE-associated OD had a more severe and debilitating impact on all aspects of the patient's quality of life than SLE prior to OD development, including further limitations in activities of daily living after the development of OD. <b>Discussion:</b> Study findings guided the development of a comprehensive conceptual model that fully represents the patient experience of living with SLE-associated OD, highlighting the additional burden of OD when compared with SLE alone. <b>Conclusions:</b> The conceptual model will inform improvements in disease management, which may result in better patient outcomes and aid development of clinical outcome assessments of disease burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440069/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10051645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a Conceptual Model to Understand Disease Burden in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Organ Damage 理解系统性红斑狼疮和器官损害患者疾病负担的概念模型的发展
Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2023.82228
Lynne Broderick, Wen-Hung Chen, Roger Levy, April Mitchell Foster, Cindy Umanzor Figueroa, Kerry Gairy, Deven Chauhan
Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can lead to irreversible organ damage (OD). Data describing the patient burden of OD, as compared with SLE without OD, are limited. Objective: To develop a comprehensive conceptual model describing the burden experienced by patients living with SLE-associated OD. Methods: There were three phases to this qualitative study. First, a targeted literature review was conducted to inform a draft conceptual model. Second, key opinion leaders (KOLs) were interviewed to assess the draft conceptual model and help shape patient interview materials. Third, patients of different demographic backgrounds from across the United States were interviewed individually to gather their perspectives on living with SLE-associated OD. Data from concept elicitation interviews with KOLs and patients were coded and analyzed using NVivo software to identify the key concepts of the overall patient burden of SLE-associated OD. Findings from the KOL and patient interviews were used to finalize the conceptual model. Results: KOLs highlighted that SLE-associated OD carried a higher rate of mortality than SLE alone. Participants with SLE-associated OD (n = 40) experienced detrimental impacts across 4 areas of their lives: physical, cognitive, psychosocial functioning, and economic and work-related well-being. Physical impacts were described by all participants, often affecting their ability to perform everyday tasks. Many also described deterioration of cognitive functioning. Almost all participants experienced emotional impacts and challenges to their relationships and social lives resulting from living with SLE-associated OD. Additionally, SLE-associated OD imposed an economic burden including increased healthcare costs. SLE-associated OD had a more severe and debilitating impact on all aspects of the patient’s quality of life than SLE prior to OD development, including further limitations in activities of daily living after the development of OD. Discussion: Study findings guided the development of a comprehensive conceptual model that fully represents the patient experience of living with SLE-associated OD, highlighting the additional burden of OD when compared with SLE alone. Conclusions: The conceptual model will inform improvements in disease management, which may result in better patient outcomes and aid development of clinical outcome assessments of disease burden.
背景:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,可导致不可逆器官损伤(OD)。与无OD的SLE相比,描述OD患者负担的数据有限。目的:建立一个全面的概念模型,描述sled相关OD患者所经历的负担。方法:本定性研究分为三个阶段。首先,进行了有针对性的文献综述,以提供概念模型草案。其次,对关键意见领袖(kol)进行访谈,以评估概念模型草案并帮助形成患者访谈材料。第三,对来自美国各地不同人口背景的患者进行单独访谈,以收集他们对与sled相关的OD生活的看法。使用NVivo软件对kol和患者的概念启发访谈数据进行编码和分析,以确定sled相关OD的总体患者负担的关键概念。来自KOL和患者访谈的结果被用于最终确定概念模型。结果:kol强调SLE相关的OD比单独SLE的死亡率更高。与sled相关的吸毒过量的参与者(n = 40)在生活的四个方面受到了不利影响:身体、认知、社会心理功能、经济和工作相关的幸福感。所有参与者都描述了身体上的影响,通常会影响他们执行日常任务的能力。许多人还描述了认知功能的恶化。几乎所有的参与者都经历了情感上的影响,他们的人际关系和社会生活都受到了挑战,这是由于与sled相关的吸毒过量。此外,与slee相关的吸毒过量造成了经济负担,包括医疗费用增加。SLE相关的OD对患者生活质量的各个方面的影响比OD发展前的SLE更严重,更虚弱,包括在OD发展后日常生活活动的进一步限制。讨论:研究结果指导了一个全面概念模型的发展,该模型充分代表了SLE相关的OD患者的生活经历,强调了与单独SLE相比,OD的额外负担。结论:概念模型将为疾病管理的改进提供信息,这可能导致更好的患者预后,并有助于疾病负担的临床结果评估的发展。
{"title":"Development of a Conceptual Model to Understand Disease Burden in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Organ Damage","authors":"Lynne Broderick, Wen-Hung Chen, Roger Levy, April Mitchell Foster, Cindy Umanzor Figueroa, Kerry Gairy, Deven Chauhan","doi":"10.36469/jheor.2023.82228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2023.82228","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can lead to irreversible organ damage (OD). Data describing the patient burden of OD, as compared with SLE without OD, are limited. Objective: To develop a comprehensive conceptual model describing the burden experienced by patients living with SLE-associated OD. Methods: There were three phases to this qualitative study. First, a targeted literature review was conducted to inform a draft conceptual model. Second, key opinion leaders (KOLs) were interviewed to assess the draft conceptual model and help shape patient interview materials. Third, patients of different demographic backgrounds from across the United States were interviewed individually to gather their perspectives on living with SLE-associated OD. Data from concept elicitation interviews with KOLs and patients were coded and analyzed using NVivo software to identify the key concepts of the overall patient burden of SLE-associated OD. Findings from the KOL and patient interviews were used to finalize the conceptual model. Results: KOLs highlighted that SLE-associated OD carried a higher rate of mortality than SLE alone. Participants with SLE-associated OD (n = 40) experienced detrimental impacts across 4 areas of their lives: physical, cognitive, psychosocial functioning, and economic and work-related well-being. Physical impacts were described by all participants, often affecting their ability to perform everyday tasks. Many also described deterioration of cognitive functioning. Almost all participants experienced emotional impacts and challenges to their relationships and social lives resulting from living with SLE-associated OD. Additionally, SLE-associated OD imposed an economic burden including increased healthcare costs. SLE-associated OD had a more severe and debilitating impact on all aspects of the patient’s quality of life than SLE prior to OD development, including further limitations in activities of daily living after the development of OD. Discussion: Study findings guided the development of a comprehensive conceptual model that fully represents the patient experience of living with SLE-associated OD, highlighting the additional burden of OD when compared with SLE alone. Conclusions: The conceptual model will inform improvements in disease management, which may result in better patient outcomes and aid development of clinical outcome assessments of disease burden.","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136019836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Projecting the Potential Budget Impact Analysis of Paliperidone Palmitate in Egyptian Adult Patients with Schizophrenia. 预测帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯对埃及成年精神分裂症患者的潜在预算影响分析。
Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-08-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.36469/001c.83240
Gihan Elsisi, Mohamed Ezzat, Mohamed Ramadan

Background: Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder that has greater negative consequences on role functioning than many other severe chronic diseases. Objective: We evaluated the economic impact of long-acting injections of paliperidone palmitate (PP) vs daily oral antipsychotics to treat chronic schizophrenia from a societal perspective over a 2-year period. Methods: A static budget impact model was developed to compare PP with daily oral antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole) in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia. Our study included treatments used during relapse and hospitalization, validated by an expert panel. The clinical parameters were extracted from the PRIDE trial. Direct medical costs and indirect costs were measured. The unit cost of drug acquisition for all medications was extracted from the public sector. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The target population in our model was estimated to be 142 incident patients. In the first year, the total drug costs in Egyptian pounds (EGP) for PP and oral antipsychotics were £2.7 million and £724 004, respectively, while the total medical costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £3 million and £5.6 million, respectively. In the second year, the total drug costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £2.7 million and £724 004, respectively, while the total medical costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £3 million and £5 million, respectively. The total costs for PP (£11.6 million) over 2 years were less than those of oral antipsychotics without PP (£12.7 million). PP produced an estimated budget savings of £1 046 561 (budget savings per patient per year, £3667). In addition, PP resulted in the avoidance of 18 hospitalizations per year compared with the without-PP arm. Sensitivity analyses showed that the percent of hospitalizations for both oral antipsychotics and PP had the greatest impact on the results. Conclusion: The lower hospitalization rates associated with PP offset the increase in drug costs. PP may potentially be cost-saving compared with the standard of care in chronic schizophrenia in Egyptian representative healthcare settings. Policy makers may consider this approach to improve patient outcomes and budget sustainability.

背景:精神分裂症是一种严重的精神障碍,与许多其他严重的慢性疾病相比,它对角色功能的负面影响更大。目的:我们从社会角度评估了长效注射棕榈酸帕利哌酮(PP)与每日口服抗精神病药物在2年内治疗慢性精神分裂症的经济影响。方法:建立静态预算影响模型,比较PP与每日口服抗精神病药物(利培酮、奥氮平和阿立哌唑)治疗慢性精神分裂症的疗效。我们的研究包括复发和住院期间使用的治疗方法,并经专家小组验证。临床参数从PRIDE试验中提取。对直接医疗费用和间接费用进行了计量。所有药物的药品采购单位成本都是从公共部门提取的。进行了单向敏感性分析。结果:我们模型中的目标人群估计为142名事件患者。第一年,PP和口服抗精神病药物的总药物成本(以埃及镑计)分别为270万英镑和724英镑 004,而PP和口服抗精神病药物的总医疗费用分别为300万英镑和560万英镑。第二年,PP和口服抗精神病药物的总药物成本分别为270万英镑和724英镑 004,而PP和口服抗精神病药物的总医疗费用分别为300万英镑和500万英镑。PP在2年内的总成本(1160万英镑)低于不含PP的口服抗精神病药物(1270万美元)。PP预计可节省1英镑的预算 046 561(每位患者每年节省预算3667英镑)。此外,与无PP组相比,PP组每年避免了18例住院。敏感性分析显示,口服抗精神病药物和PP的住院率对结果的影响最大。结论:与PP相关的较低住院率抵消了药物成本的增加。与埃及代表性医疗机构的慢性精神分裂症护理标准相比,PP可能会节省成本。政策制定者可能会考虑采用这种方法来改善患者的治疗效果和预算的可持续性。
{"title":"Projecting the Potential Budget Impact Analysis of Paliperidone Palmitate in Egyptian Adult Patients with Schizophrenia.","authors":"Gihan Elsisi, Mohamed Ezzat, Mohamed Ramadan","doi":"10.36469/001c.83240","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.83240","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder that has greater negative consequences on role functioning than many other severe chronic diseases. <b>Objective:</b> We evaluated the economic impact of long-acting injections of paliperidone palmitate (PP) vs daily oral antipsychotics to treat chronic schizophrenia from a societal perspective over a 2-year period. <b>Methods:</b> A static budget impact model was developed to compare PP with daily oral antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole) in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia. Our study included treatments used during relapse and hospitalization, validated by an expert panel. The clinical parameters were extracted from the PRIDE trial. Direct medical costs and indirect costs were measured. The unit cost of drug acquisition for all medications was extracted from the public sector. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. <b>Results:</b> The target population in our model was estimated to be 142 incident patients. In the first year, the total drug costs in Egyptian pounds (EGP) for PP and oral antipsychotics were £2.7 million and £724 004, respectively, while the total medical costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £3 million and £5.6 million, respectively. In the second year, the total drug costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £2.7 million and £724 004, respectively, while the total medical costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £3 million and £5 million, respectively. The total costs for PP (£11.6 million) over 2 years were less than those of oral antipsychotics without PP (£12.7 million). PP produced an estimated budget savings of £1 046 561 (budget savings per patient per year, £3667). In addition, PP resulted in the avoidance of 18 hospitalizations per year compared with the without-PP arm. Sensitivity analyses showed that the percent of hospitalizations for both oral antipsychotics and PP had the greatest impact on the results. <b>Conclusion:</b> The lower hospitalization rates associated with PP offset the increase in drug costs. PP may potentially be cost-saving compared with the standard of care in chronic schizophrenia in Egyptian representative healthcare settings. Policy makers may consider this approach to improve patient outcomes and budget sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"23-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439680/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10200237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost of Serum Versus Skin Allergy Testing Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries in the United States 在美国医疗保险服务收费受益人中血清与皮肤过敏测试的成本
Q2 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2023.77482
Kenny Kwong, Yang Lu
Background: Testing for allergic sensitization can be achieved similarly via skin or serum specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing, although the costs of each method differ. Objective: This study compared cost and utilization of allergy testing utilizing skin vs sIgE testing and whether equal access (parity) to both testing methods affects overall allergy testing costs among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the United States. Methods: Allergy test utilization and payment data were analyzed using 100% 2019 Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Beneficiaries with any sIgE test, skin prick test, or intradermal skin test associated with ICD-10 codes of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and food allergy were included. Aggregate and per-beneficiary testing cost, number of allergens tested, and number of allergy-related specialist visits incurred were estimated by the testing patterns of sIgE only, skin prick only, intradermal only, skin prick and intradermal, and sIgE plus prick and/or intradermal. Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) with parity for all allergy tests and those which restricted sIgE testing were compared. Multivariate linear regression was performed on the association between testing patterns and each cost and utilization measure, controlling for parity, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and dual-eligible status. Results: We analyzed 270 831 patients and 327 263 allergy-related claims. Total payment for all allergy tests was $71 380 866, including $15 903 954 for sIgE tests, $42 223 930 for skin prick tests, and $13 252 982 for intradermal tests. Beneficiaries receiving sIgE tests had only 1.8 fewer allergist visits than those with skin prick tests only (0.8 vs 2.6). Cost of testing per beneficiary was also lower in sIgE testing only compared with skin prick tests only ($161 vs $247). Multivariable regression results showed per-beneficiary payments for allergy testing were on average $22 lower in MACs with parity compared with MACs without parity. Discussion: Serum specific IgE testing is associated with lower costs and fewer allergy specialist visits compared with skin testing. Insurance coverage with parity toward sIgE and skin testing is associated with lower overall costs of allergy testing. Conclusion: Among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the United States, sIgE testing may be more cost effective compared with skin testing in the management of allergic disease.
背景:虽然每种方法的成本不同,但同样可以通过皮肤或血清特异性免疫球蛋白E (sIgE)检测来检测过敏致敏性。目的:本研究比较了皮肤过敏试验和sIgE过敏试验的成本和使用情况,以及两种试验方法的均等使用是否会影响美国医疗保险按服务收费受益人的总体过敏试验成本。方法:使用100% 2019年医疗保险按服务收费索赔数据分析过敏试验使用和支付数据。受试者进行了任何与ICD-10编码相关的过敏性鼻炎、哮喘和食物过敏的sIgE试验、皮肤点刺试验或皮内皮肤试验。通过单独sIgE、单独皮刺、单独皮内、单独皮刺和皮内以及sIgE加皮刺和/或皮内的测试模式来估计总体和每位受益人的测试成本、测试的过敏原数量以及与过敏相关的专家就诊次数。医疗保险行政承包商(mac)与同等的所有过敏试验和那些限制sIgE试验进行比较。在控制平价、年龄、性别、种族/民族和双重资格的情况下,对检测模式与每个成本和利用措施之间的关系进行多元线性回归。结果:我们分析了270831例患者和327263例过敏相关的索赔。所有过敏试验的付款总额为71 380 866美元,其中sIgE试验为15 903 954美元,皮肤针刺试验为42 223 930美元,皮内试验为13 252 982美元。接受sIgE试验的受益人比只接受皮肤点刺试验的受益人访问过敏症医生的次数少1.8次(0.8比2.6)。与仅皮肤点刺试验相比,仅sIgE试验的每位受益人的检测成本也较低(161美元对247美元)。多变量回归结果显示,与没有平价的MACs相比,平价MACs的过敏测试的每个受益人支付平均低22美元。讨论:与皮肤测试相比,血清特异性IgE测试与较低的成本和较少的过敏专科就诊有关。与sIgE和皮肤测试相同的保险覆盖范围与较低的过敏测试总成本有关。结论:在美国医疗保险按服务收费的受益人中,在过敏性疾病的管理中,sIgE测试可能比皮肤测试更具成本效益。
{"title":"Cost of Serum Versus Skin Allergy Testing Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries in the United States","authors":"Kenny Kwong, Yang Lu","doi":"10.36469/jheor.2023.77482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2023.77482","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Testing for allergic sensitization can be achieved similarly via skin or serum specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing, although the costs of each method differ. Objective: This study compared cost and utilization of allergy testing utilizing skin vs sIgE testing and whether equal access (parity) to both testing methods affects overall allergy testing costs among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the United States. Methods: Allergy test utilization and payment data were analyzed using 100% 2019 Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Beneficiaries with any sIgE test, skin prick test, or intradermal skin test associated with ICD-10 codes of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and food allergy were included. Aggregate and per-beneficiary testing cost, number of allergens tested, and number of allergy-related specialist visits incurred were estimated by the testing patterns of sIgE only, skin prick only, intradermal only, skin prick and intradermal, and sIgE plus prick and/or intradermal. Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) with parity for all allergy tests and those which restricted sIgE testing were compared. Multivariate linear regression was performed on the association between testing patterns and each cost and utilization measure, controlling for parity, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and dual-eligible status. Results: We analyzed 270 831 patients and 327 263 allergy-related claims. Total payment for all allergy tests was $71 380 866, including $15 903 954 for sIgE tests, $42 223 930 for skin prick tests, and $13 252 982 for intradermal tests. Beneficiaries receiving sIgE tests had only 1.8 fewer allergist visits than those with skin prick tests only (0.8 vs 2.6). Cost of testing per beneficiary was also lower in sIgE testing only compared with skin prick tests only ($161 vs $247). Multivariable regression results showed per-beneficiary payments for allergy testing were on average $22 lower in MACs with parity compared with MACs without parity. Discussion: Serum specific IgE testing is associated with lower costs and fewer allergy specialist visits compared with skin testing. Insurance coverage with parity toward sIgE and skin testing is associated with lower overall costs of allergy testing. Conclusion: Among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the United States, sIgE testing may be more cost effective compared with skin testing in the management of allergic disease.","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"585 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134966063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1