Pub Date : 2025-02-20eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.127446
Nikhil Khandelwal, Jimmy Hinson, Trinh Nguyen, Alexjandro Daviano, Yihua Xu, Brandon T Suehs, Sally Higgins, Marie Sanchirico, J Michael Wells
Background: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) testing rates and associated clinical and economic outcomes data in the US Medicare population are limited. Objective: To characterize individuals with AATD, describe clinical outcomes/healthcare research utilization (HCRU) among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with or without AATD, and identify AATD testing rates among individuals newly diagnosed with COPD. Methods: This retrospective, observational analysis of claims data included individuals from the Humana Research Database (aged 18-89 years) enrolled in Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans. Three cohorts included individuals with evidence of AATD; individuals with COPD + AATD matched to individuals with COPD; and individuals with newly diagnosed COPD. AATD health-related outcomes, such as pulmonary and extrapulmonary conditions or events, and economic outcomes, including inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, and physician visits, were examined independently during the pre-index and post-index periods and compared between those with ATTD and without AATD. Results: We identified 1103 individuals with AATD (aged 67.2 ± 10.0 years, 56.3% women, 94.5% White); overall, 22.2% had exacerbations, respiratory distress, and respiratory failure. Individuals with COPD and AATD (n = 742) were matched to individuals with COPD (n = 7420), based on age (68 ± 9 years), sex (55.0% women), and race (97.2% White). The AATD group had a higher proportion of emphysema (47.4% vs 18.7%), COPD exacerbations (40.6% vs 24.7%), and cirrhosis (4.0% vs 1.3%) than the non-AATD group. All-cause inpatient admissions (31.7% vs 27.3%), COPD-specific inpatient admissions (7.4% vs 4.3%), and COPD-specific emergency department visits (19.5% vs 10.8%) were higher in individuals who had ATTD than in those without AATD. AATD testing rates among individuals with newly diagnosed COPD increased slightly over time (2015: 1.07%; 2020: 1.49%). Individuals with COPD and AATD had more comorbidities and higher HCRU. Testing rates increased slightly but remained low. Discussion: Further research is needed to assess the impact of improved AATD testing on those with COPD. Conclusion: Increased awareness, earlier testing, and treatment may reduce the healthcare burden of AATD in the US Medicare population.
背景:美国医疗保险人群中α -1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症(AATD)检测率和相关临床和经济结果数据有限。目的:描述AATD患者的特征,描述伴有或不伴有AATD的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的临床结果/医疗保健研究利用(HCRU),并确定新诊断为COPD患者的AATD检测率。方法:回顾性观察性分析来自Humana研究数据库(年龄在18-89岁)参加医疗保险优势处方药计划的索赔数据。三个队列包括有AATD证据的个体;COPD + AATD患者与COPD患者匹配;以及新诊断的慢性阻塞性肺病患者。AATD与健康相关的结果,如肺和肺外状况或事件,以及经济结果,包括住院、急诊科就诊和医生就诊,在指数前和指数后独立检查,并比较ATTD患者和非AATD患者。结果:我们发现1103例AATD患者(年龄67.2±10.0岁,女性56.3%,白人94.5%);总体而言,22.2%的患者有急性发作、呼吸窘迫和呼吸衰竭。COPD和AATD患者(n = 742)与COPD患者(n = 7420)匹配,基于年龄(68±9岁)、性别(55.0%为女性)和种族(97.2%为白人)。与非AATD组相比,AATD组肺气肿(47.4% vs 18.7%)、COPD加重(40.6% vs 24.7%)和肝硬化(4.0% vs 1.3%)的比例更高。ATTD患者的全因住院率(31.7% vs 27.3%)、copd特异性住院率(7.4% vs 4.3%)和copd特异性急诊科就诊率(19.5% vs 10.8%)高于无AATD患者。新诊断的COPD患者的AATD检测率随着时间的推移略有增加(2015年:1.07%;2020年:1.49%)。COPD和AATD患者有更多的合并症和更高的HCRU。检测率略有上升,但仍然很低。讨论:需要进一步的研究来评估改进的AATD检测对COPD患者的影响。结论:提高对AATD的认识,早期检测和治疗可以减轻美国医疗保险人群中AATD的医疗负担。
{"title":"Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients With Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency in a US Medicare Advantage Population.","authors":"Nikhil Khandelwal, Jimmy Hinson, Trinh Nguyen, Alexjandro Daviano, Yihua Xu, Brandon T Suehs, Sally Higgins, Marie Sanchirico, J Michael Wells","doi":"10.36469/001c.127446","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.127446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) testing rates and associated clinical and economic outcomes data in the US Medicare population are limited. <b>Objective:</b> To characterize individuals with AATD, describe clinical outcomes/healthcare research utilization (HCRU) among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with or without AATD, and identify AATD testing rates among individuals newly diagnosed with COPD. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, observational analysis of claims data included individuals from the Humana Research Database (aged 18-89 years) enrolled in Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans. Three cohorts included individuals with evidence of AATD; individuals with COPD + AATD matched to individuals with COPD; and individuals with newly diagnosed COPD. AATD health-related outcomes, such as pulmonary and extrapulmonary conditions or events, and economic outcomes, including inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, and physician visits, were examined independently during the pre-index and post-index periods and compared between those with ATTD and without AATD. <b>Results:</b> We identified 1103 individuals with AATD (aged 67.2 ± 10.0 years, 56.3% women, 94.5% White); overall, 22.2% had exacerbations, respiratory distress, and respiratory failure. Individuals with COPD and AATD (n = 742) were matched to individuals with COPD (n = 7420), based on age (68 ± 9 years), sex (55.0% women), and race (97.2% White). The AATD group had a higher proportion of emphysema (47.4% vs 18.7%), COPD exacerbations (40.6% vs 24.7%), and cirrhosis (4.0% vs 1.3%) than the non-AATD group. All-cause inpatient admissions (31.7% vs 27.3%), COPD-specific inpatient admissions (7.4% vs 4.3%), and COPD-specific emergency department visits (19.5% vs 10.8%) were higher in individuals who had ATTD than in those without AATD. AATD testing rates among individuals with newly diagnosed COPD increased slightly over time (2015: 1.07%; 2020: 1.49%). Individuals with COPD and AATD had more comorbidities and higher HCRU. Testing rates increased slightly but remained low. <b>Discussion:</b> Further research is needed to assess the impact of improved AATD testing on those with COPD. <b>Conclusion:</b> Increased awareness, earlier testing, and treatment may reduce the healthcare burden of AATD in the US Medicare population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846658/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143483412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-19eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.125546
Emma Williams, Luke Skinner, Richard Hudson, Arunesh Sil, Katharina Ecsy, Elisheva Lew, Abdul Jabbar Omar Alsaleh, Elin Gruffydd, Andrew Lloyd, Daniele Avenoso
Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) - a potentially debilitating complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - is a rare condition. Objectives: This vignette-based study aimed to generate utility values to inform an economic model via an online survey wherein cGvHD health state (HS) vignettes were valued by the general UK population using the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Methods: This non-interventional health-related quality of life (HRQoL) study was conducted in 3 stages across the UK: the development, validation, and valuation of HS vignettes to generate utility values for cGvHD. Four HS for cGvHD were defined based on an economic model partitioning different treatment level responses in patients with cGvHD receiving third-line (3L) therapy (HS1: complete response, HS2: partial response, HS3: lack of response, and HS4: recurrent cGvHD). Draft vignettes were developed for each HS based on 4 previously published GvHD vignettes. The contents of the draft vignettes were reviewed for all aspects of cGvHD symptoms and functional impact and validated through semistructured interviews with 5 clinical experts. The 4 finalized HS vignettes were valued by 300 participants from the UK general population using EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D VAS. Results: Previously published vignettes were used to develop the vignettes for the current study that described GvHD in the context of blood cancer and other rare blood disorders (n = 2 each) and included symptoms, functioning, and quality of life for a patient in the HS. The highest and lowest mean EQ-5D-5L utility scores were observed for HS1 (mean [95% CI]: 0.577 [0.558-0.595]) and HS4 (0.061 [0.034-0.088]), respectively. The EQ-5D-VAS showed the highest and lowest mean utility scores for HS1 (46.8 [44.9-48.6]) and HS4 (25.6 [23.4-27.7]), respectively. Conclusion: This study generated utility values for HS vignettes describing symptoms, functioning, and HRQoL for patients with cGvHD receiving 3L therapy. The utility values highlighted a substantial burden of cGvHD and HRQoL impact associated with the treatment response level. However, assessing concordance between utility estimates derived from the vignette-based method in a general population and those from patients with cGvHD is further warranted.
{"title":"A Vignette Study to Derive Health-Related Quality-of-Life Weights for Individuals with Steroid Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Receiving Third-Line Therapy in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Emma Williams, Luke Skinner, Richard Hudson, Arunesh Sil, Katharina Ecsy, Elisheva Lew, Abdul Jabbar Omar Alsaleh, Elin Gruffydd, Andrew Lloyd, Daniele Avenoso","doi":"10.36469/001c.125546","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.125546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) - a potentially debilitating complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - is a rare condition. <b>Objectives:</b> This vignette-based study aimed to generate utility values to inform an economic model via an online survey wherein cGvHD health state (HS) vignettes were valued by the general UK population using the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). <b>Methods:</b> This non-interventional health-related quality of life (HRQoL) study was conducted in 3 stages across the UK: the development, validation, and valuation of HS vignettes to generate utility values for cGvHD. Four HS for cGvHD were defined based on an economic model partitioning different treatment level responses in patients with cGvHD receiving third-line (3L) therapy (HS1: complete response, HS2: partial response, HS3: lack of response, and HS4: recurrent cGvHD). Draft vignettes were developed for each HS based on 4 previously published GvHD vignettes. The contents of the draft vignettes were reviewed for all aspects of cGvHD symptoms and functional impact and validated through semistructured interviews with 5 clinical experts. The 4 finalized HS vignettes were valued by 300 participants from the UK general population using EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D VAS. <b>Results:</b> Previously published vignettes were used to develop the vignettes for the current study that described GvHD in the context of blood cancer and other rare blood disorders (n = 2 each) and included symptoms, functioning, and quality of life for a patient in the HS. The highest and lowest mean EQ-5D-5L utility scores were observed for HS1 (mean [95% CI]: 0.577 [0.558-0.595]) and HS4 (0.061 [0.034-0.088]), respectively. The EQ-5D-VAS showed the highest and lowest mean utility scores for HS1 (46.8 [44.9-48.6]) and HS4 (25.6 [23.4-27.7]), respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study generated utility values for HS vignettes describing symptoms, functioning, and HRQoL for patients with cGvHD receiving 3L therapy. The utility values highlighted a substantial burden of cGvHD and HRQoL impact associated with the treatment response level. However, assessing concordance between utility estimates derived from the vignette-based method in a general population and those from patients with cGvHD is further warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"58-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844253/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143483408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-07eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.127820
Laurence Mainville, Hélène Veillette, Paul R Fortin
Background: Prescription drug insurance in Canada is constituted of a patchwork of public and private insurance plans. The type of drug insurance may have a negative impact on access to treatment for patients covered by public plans compared with private plans. Objectives: In patients with psoriasis treated with advanced therapy in public vs private drug insurance groups, we compared: (1) psoriasis severity scores when an advanced therapy was prescribed, (2) psoriasis severity scores at follow-up, (3) treatment response, and (4) delay between prescription and first dose of advanced therapy. Methods: This unicentric, retrospective cohort study included patients suffering from psoriasis treated by advanced therapy, dermatologist-prescribed between September 2015 and August 2019, in a tertiary academic care center in Québec City, Canada. Data were collected from medical records. Results: Patients treated with an advanced therapy for psoriasis covered under the provincial public drug insurance plan (n = 78) and under a private drug plan (n = 93) did not differ regarding the studied outcomes. Patients' characteristics differed between groups. Patients in the public group were older (P < .0001), more socioeconomically deprived (P < .05), and more likely to benefit from compassion from the industry to access a prescribed medication free of charge (P < .0001) compared with patients from the privately insured group. Discussion: The high prevalence of compassionate programs from the industry in the public insurance group (42% vs 14%), and the high prevalence of psoriasis on difficult-to-treat areas (face, genitalia, and/or palmoplantar areas) in our cohort (85.4%) may mask differences in access to advanced therapy between the two groups. Conclusions: Prescribers of advanced therapy can be reassured, as we found no inequality in access or care based on patients' drug insurance coverage.
背景:加拿大的处方药保险是由公共和私人保险计划拼凑而成。与私人计划相比,药物保险的类型可能对公共计划覆盖的患者获得治疗的机会产生负面影响。目的:在公共和私人药物保险组中接受先进治疗的银屑病患者中,我们比较:(1)开药时的银屑病严重程度评分,(2)随访时的银屑病严重程度评分,(3)治疗反应,(4)开药和首次给药之间的延迟。方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年9月至2019年8月在加拿大曲海贝市的一家三级学术护理中心接受皮肤科医生处方的先进疗法治疗的牛皮癣患者。数据是从医疗记录中收集的。结果:在省公共药物保险计划(n = 78)和私人药物保险计划(n = 93)下接受高级治疗的银屑病患者在研究结果方面没有差异。两组患者的特征不同。公共保险组的患者年龄较大(P P P P讨论:公共保险组中来自行业的同情计划的高患病率(42%对14%),以及我们队列中银屑病在难以治疗的部位(面部,生殖器和/或掌跖区)的高患病率(85.4%)可能掩盖了两组之间获得高级治疗的差异。结论:先进治疗的处方者可以放心,因为我们发现基于患者药物保险覆盖范围的可及性或护理不平等。
{"title":"Drug Insurance and Psoriasis Severity: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Laurence Mainville, Hélène Veillette, Paul R Fortin","doi":"10.36469/001c.127820","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.127820","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Prescription drug insurance in Canada is constituted of a patchwork of public and private insurance plans. The type of drug insurance may have a negative impact on access to treatment for patients covered by public plans compared with private plans. <b>Objectives:</b> In patients with psoriasis treated with advanced therapy in public vs private drug insurance groups, we compared: (1) psoriasis severity scores when an advanced therapy was prescribed, (2) psoriasis severity scores at follow-up, (3) treatment response, and (4) delay between prescription and first dose of advanced therapy. <b>Methods:</b> This unicentric, retrospective cohort study included patients suffering from psoriasis treated by advanced therapy, dermatologist-prescribed between September 2015 and August 2019, in a tertiary academic care center in Québec City, Canada. Data were collected from medical records. <b>Results:</b> Patients treated with an advanced therapy for psoriasis covered under the provincial public drug insurance plan (n = 78) and under a private drug plan (n = 93) did not differ regarding the studied outcomes. Patients' characteristics differed between groups. Patients in the public group were older (<i>P</i> < .0001), more socioeconomically deprived (<i>P</i> < .05), and more likely to benefit from compassion from the industry to access a prescribed medication free of charge (<i>P</i> < .0001) compared with patients from the privately insured group. <b>Discussion:</b> The high prevalence of compassionate programs from the industry in the public insurance group (42% vs 14%), and the high prevalence of psoriasis on difficult-to-treat areas (face, genitalia, and/or palmoplantar areas) in our cohort (85.4%) may mask differences in access to advanced therapy between the two groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Prescribers of advanced therapy can be reassured, as we found no inequality in access or care based on patients' drug insurance coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807372/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143382656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-03eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.127920
Roque Cardona-Hernandez, Alberto de la Cuadra-Grande, Julen Monje, María Echave, Itziar Oyagüez, María Álvarez, Isabel Leiva-Gea
Background: Modeling techniques in the field of pediatrics present unique challenges beyond traditional model limitations, and sometimes difficulties in faithfully simulating the condition's evolution over time. Objective: This study aimed to identify whether economic modeling approaches in diabetes in pediatric patients align with the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines and the latest scientific evidence. Methods: A literature review was performed in March 2023 to identify modeling-based economic evaluations in diabetes in pediatric patients. Data were extracted and synthesized from eligible studies. Clinical practice guidelines for diabetes were gathered to compare their alignment with modeling strategies. Two endocrinology specialists provided insights on the latest findings in diabetes that are not yet included in the guidelines. A multidisciplinary group of experts agreed on the relevant themes to conduct the comparative analysis: parameter informing on glycemic control, diabetic ketoacidosis/hypoglycemia, C-peptide as prognostic biomarker, metabolic memory, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status, pediatric-specific sources of risk equations, and pediatric-specific sources of utilities/disutilities. Results: Nineteen modeling-based studies (7 de novo, 12 predesigned models) and 34 guidelines were selected. Hemoglobin A1c was the main parameter to model the glycemic control; however, guidelines recommend the usage of complementary measures (eg, time in range) which are not included in economic models. Eight models included diabetic ketoacidosis (42.1%), 16 included hypoglycemia (84.2%), 2 included C-peptide (1 of those as prognostic factor) (10.5%) and 1 included legacy effect (5.3%). Neither guidelines nor models included recent findings, such as age at diagnosis or socioeconomic status, as prognostic factors. The lack of pediatric-specific sources for risk equations and utility/disutility values were additional limitations. Discussion: Economic models designed for assessing interventions in diabetes in pediatric patients should be based on pediatric-specific data and include novel adjuvant glucose-monitoring metrics and latest evidence on prognostic factors (C-peptide, legacy effect, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status) to provide a more faithful reflection of the disease. Conclusions: Economic models represent useful tools to inform decision making. However, further research assessing the gaps is needed to enhance evidence-based health economic modeling that best represents reality.
{"title":"Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?","authors":"Roque Cardona-Hernandez, Alberto de la Cuadra-Grande, Julen Monje, María Echave, Itziar Oyagüez, María Álvarez, Isabel Leiva-Gea","doi":"10.36469/001c.127920","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.127920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Modeling techniques in the field of pediatrics present unique challenges beyond traditional model limitations, and sometimes difficulties in faithfully simulating the condition's evolution over time. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to identify whether economic modeling approaches in diabetes in pediatric patients align with the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines and the latest scientific evidence. <b>Methods:</b> A literature review was performed in March 2023 to identify modeling-based economic evaluations in diabetes in pediatric patients. Data were extracted and synthesized from eligible studies. Clinical practice guidelines for diabetes were gathered to compare their alignment with modeling strategies. Two endocrinology specialists provided insights on the latest findings in diabetes that are not yet included in the guidelines. A multidisciplinary group of experts agreed on the relevant themes to conduct the comparative analysis: parameter informing on glycemic control, diabetic ketoacidosis/hypoglycemia, C-peptide as prognostic biomarker, metabolic memory, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status, pediatric-specific sources of risk equations, and pediatric-specific sources of utilities/disutilities. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen modeling-based studies (7 de novo, 12 predesigned models) and 34 guidelines were selected. Hemoglobin A1c was the main parameter to model the glycemic control; however, guidelines recommend the usage of complementary measures (eg, time in range) which are not included in economic models. Eight models included diabetic ketoacidosis (42.1%), 16 included hypoglycemia (84.2%), 2 included C-peptide (1 of those as prognostic factor) (10.5%) and 1 included legacy effect (5.3%). Neither guidelines nor models included recent findings, such as age at diagnosis or socioeconomic status, as prognostic factors. The lack of pediatric-specific sources for risk equations and utility/disutility values were additional limitations. <b>Discussion:</b> Economic models designed for assessing interventions in diabetes in pediatric patients should be based on pediatric-specific data and include novel adjuvant glucose-monitoring metrics and latest evidence on prognostic factors (C-peptide, legacy effect, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status) to provide a more faithful reflection of the disease. <b>Conclusions:</b> Economic models represent useful tools to inform decision making. However, further research assessing the gaps is needed to enhance evidence-based health economic modeling that best represents reality.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"30-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797704/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143255734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.125097
Qinghua Li, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Pamela Moise, Harry Jin, Kaylen Brzozowski, Irina Kolobova
Background: Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is limited by post-transplant neutropenia and leukopenia (PTN/PTL). Despite its clinical significance, the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) related to PTN/PTL remains poorly characterized. Objective: To evaluate HCRU among KTRs taking valganciclovir during their first year post-transplant. Methods: Using TriNetX Dataworks-USA, a federated, de-identified electronic medical record database, we identified adult KTRs who underwent their first kidney transplant from January 2012 to September 2020. All eligible patients were followed for 1 year. PTN/PTL was defined as absolute neutrophil count less than 1000/μL or white blood cell count less than 3500/μL. Multivariable logistic/Poisson regression models were used to assess the association between PTN/PTL and various HCRU types. Results: A total of 8791 KTRs were identified, of whom 6219 (70.7%) developed PTN/PTL at a mean of 5.7 months post-transplantation. Hospitalizations, rehospitalizations, emergency room visits, outpatient appointments, packed red blood cell transfusions, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration were more prevalent among KTRs with PTN/PTL (61.1% vs 49.5%, 24.5% vs 14.1%, 35.2% vs 28.9%, 30.4 vs 26.2 visits, 22.3% vs 17.6%, 23.4% vs 2.2%, respectively; P < .001). Adjusted analyses confirmed that PTN/PTL correlated with increased HCRU across all categories. Conclusions: KTRs who developed PTN/PTL had significantly higher HCRU. Further studies are needed to evaluate strategies addressing PTN/PTL for KTRs.
{"title":"Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Leukopenia and Neutropenia in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Valganciclovir in the United States.","authors":"Qinghua Li, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Pamela Moise, Harry Jin, Kaylen Brzozowski, Irina Kolobova","doi":"10.36469/001c.125097","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.125097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is limited by post-transplant neutropenia and leukopenia (PTN/PTL). Despite its clinical significance, the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) related to PTN/PTL remains poorly characterized. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate HCRU among KTRs taking valganciclovir during their first year post-transplant. <b>Methods:</b> Using TriNetX Dataworks-USA, a federated, de-identified electronic medical record database, we identified adult KTRs who underwent their first kidney transplant from January 2012 to September 2020. All eligible patients were followed for 1 year. PTN/PTL was defined as absolute neutrophil count less than 1000/μL or white blood cell count less than 3500/μL. Multivariable logistic/Poisson regression models were used to assess the association between PTN/PTL and various HCRU types. <b>Results:</b> A total of 8791 KTRs were identified, of whom 6219 (70.7%) developed PTN/PTL at a mean of 5.7 months post-transplantation. Hospitalizations, rehospitalizations, emergency room visits, outpatient appointments, packed red blood cell transfusions, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration were more prevalent among KTRs with PTN/PTL (61.1% vs 49.5%, 24.5% vs 14.1%, 35.2% vs 28.9%, 30.4 vs 26.2 visits, 22.3% vs 17.6%, 23.4% vs 2.2%, respectively; P < .001). Adjusted analyses confirmed that PTN/PTL correlated with increased HCRU across all categories. <b>Conclusions:</b> KTRs who developed PTN/PTL had significantly higher HCRU. Further studies are needed to evaluate strategies addressing PTN/PTL for KTRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143080474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-07eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.125886
Eliza Kruger, Justin Nedzesky, Nina Thomas, Jeffrey D Dunn, Andrew A Grimm
Background: Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSDIa) is a rare inherited disorder resulting in potentially life-threatening hypoglycemia, metabolic abnormalities, and complications often requiring hospitalization. Objective: This retrospective database analysis assessed the complications, resource utilization, and costs in a large cohort of patients with GSDIa. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of GSDIa patients and matched non-GSDIa comparators utilizing the PharMetrics® Plus database. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes in any billing position for inpatient and outpatient claims (January 2016-February 2020) were identified for complications related to GSDIa. Healthcare use and costs were assessed by setting of care (inpatient, outpatient, physician office, emergency department, and pharmacy). Results: Overall, 557 patients with GSDIa and 5570 matched comparators (male, 63%; adults, 67%) were identified. The most frequent complications in patients with GSDIa vs comparators included anemia due to enzyme disorders (odds ratio, 4.0 × 103; 95% confidence interval, 555.9-2.8 × 104), hepatocellular adenoma (305.9; 41.6-2.2 × 104), liver transplantation (164.6; 21.8-1.2 × 103), and gastrostomy (152.2; 61.1-379.2), as well as acidosis (45.5; 29.4-70.3), hepatomegaly (43.6; 29.1-65.3), hyperuricemia (23.6; 11.9-46.9), and hypoglycemia (20.2; 14.3-28.7). Chronic complications (eg, gout, osteoarthritis, chronic kidney disease, and neoplasms) were more common in adults with GSDIa, whereas acute complications (eg, poor growth, gastrostomy, seizure, and hypoglycemia) were more common in children with GSDIa. Patients with GSDIa more often required hospitalization (0.53 vs 0.06 hospitalizations per patient per year) vs comparators, including 2 or more hospitalizations (26.6% vs 2.3%), longer length of stay (3.1 vs 0.4 days), and more annual visits in all care settings, including 4.3 times more visits in the emergency department. Mean annual total healthcare costs were higher for GSDIa patients vs comparators ( 4410). Discussion: In this large, retrospective database analysis, complications observed among patients with GSDIa were consistent with prior reports and demonstrate the chronic and progressive nature of the disease. Resource utilization was substantial in GSDIa patients, and mean annual total healthcare costs were almost 8 times higher than those of comparators. Conclusions: GSDIa is associated with numerous potentially serious and sometimes fatal complications, extensive resource utilization, and high management costs.
{"title":"Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Complications, Resource Utilization, and Cost of Care.","authors":"Eliza Kruger, Justin Nedzesky, Nina Thomas, Jeffrey D Dunn, Andrew A Grimm","doi":"10.36469/001c.125886","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.125886","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSDIa) is a rare inherited disorder resulting in potentially life-threatening hypoglycemia, metabolic abnormalities, and complications often requiring hospitalization. <b>Objective:</b> This retrospective database analysis assessed the complications, resource utilization, and costs in a large cohort of patients with GSDIa. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study of GSDIa patients and matched non-GSDIa comparators utilizing the PharMetrics® Plus database. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes in any billing position for inpatient and outpatient claims (January 2016-February 2020) were identified for complications related to GSDIa. Healthcare use and costs were assessed by setting of care (inpatient, outpatient, physician office, emergency department, and pharmacy). <b>Results:</b> Overall, 557 patients with GSDIa and 5570 matched comparators (male, 63%; adults, 67%) were identified. The most frequent complications in patients with GSDIa vs comparators included anemia due to enzyme disorders (odds ratio, 4.0 × 103; 95% confidence interval, 555.9-2.8 × 104), hepatocellular adenoma (305.9; 41.6-2.2 × 104), liver transplantation (164.6; 21.8-1.2 × 103), and gastrostomy (152.2; 61.1-379.2), as well as acidosis (45.5; 29.4-70.3), hepatomegaly (43.6; 29.1-65.3), hyperuricemia (23.6; 11.9-46.9), and hypoglycemia (20.2; 14.3-28.7). Chronic complications (eg, gout, osteoarthritis, chronic kidney disease, and neoplasms) were more common in adults with GSDIa, whereas acute complications (eg, poor growth, gastrostomy, seizure, and hypoglycemia) were more common in children with GSDIa. Patients with GSDIa more often required hospitalization (0.53 vs 0.06 hospitalizations per patient per year) vs comparators, including 2 or more hospitalizations (26.6% vs 2.3%), longer length of stay (3.1 vs 0.4 days), and more annual visits in all care settings, including 4.3 times more visits in the emergency department. Mean annual total healthcare costs were higher for GSDIa patients vs comparators ( <math><mn>33</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>910</mn> <mi>v</mi> <mi>s</mi></math> 4410). <b>Discussion:</b> In this large, retrospective database analysis, complications observed among patients with GSDIa were consistent with prior reports and demonstrate the chronic and progressive nature of the disease. Resource utilization was substantial in GSDIa patients, and mean annual total healthcare costs were almost 8 times higher than those of comparators. <b>Conclusions:</b> GSDIa is associated with numerous potentially serious and sometimes fatal complications, extensive resource utilization, and high management costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716495/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142950020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-02eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.126018
Holly Lumgair, Lisa Bashorum, Alasdair MacCulloch, Elizabeth Minas, George Timmins, Drago Bratkovic, Richard Perry, Medi Stone, Vasileios Blazos, Elisabetta Conti, Raymond Saich
Background: Late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is a rare, autosomal recessive metabolic disorder that is heterogeneous in disease presentation and progression. People with LOPD report a significantly lower physical, psychological, and social quality of life (QoL) than the general population. Objectives: This study investigated how individuals' self-reported LOPD status (improving, stable, declining) relates to their QoL. Participant experiences such as use of mobility or ventilation aids, caregivers, symptomology, and daily life impacts were also characterized. Methods: A 2-part observational study was conducted online between October and December 2023 using the 36-item short-form tool (SF-36) and a survey. Adults with LOPD (N=41) from Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands were recruited. Results: Participants reporting "declining" LOPD status (56%) had lower physical functioning SF-36 scores than those reporting as "stable" or "improving." Those self-reporting as stable or improving often described an acceptance of declining health in their responses. Physical functioning scores were generally stable in respondents who had been receiving enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for 1-15 years, but those who had received ERT for >15 years had lower scores. Requiring ventilation and mobility aids had additive negative impacts on physical functioning. Difficulty swallowing, speaking, and scoliosis were the most burdensome symptoms reported by those on ERT for >15-25 years. Discussion: These results demonstrate the humanistic burden of LOPD; through declining physical functioning SF-36 scores over increasing time and increased use of aids, and also through factors related to self-reported LOPD status (where declining status was associated with lower scores) and symptomology variances. Taken holistically, these areas are valuable to explore when informing optimized care. Among a largely declining cohort, even those not self-reporting decline often assumed future deterioration, highlighting the need for improved therapies and the potential to initiate or switch ERT based on evolving symptomology and daily life impacts. Conclusion: Our results indicate that progressing LOPD leads to loss of QoL in ways that relate to time, use of aids, evolving symptomology, and the patient's own perspective. A holistic approach to assessing the individual can help ensure relevant factors are investigated and held in balance, supporting optimized care.
{"title":"Exploring Quality of Life in Adults Living With Late-onset Pompe Disease: A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Patient Perceptions from Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands.","authors":"Holly Lumgair, Lisa Bashorum, Alasdair MacCulloch, Elizabeth Minas, George Timmins, Drago Bratkovic, Richard Perry, Medi Stone, Vasileios Blazos, Elisabetta Conti, Raymond Saich","doi":"10.36469/001c.126018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.126018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is a rare, autosomal recessive metabolic disorder that is heterogeneous in disease presentation and progression. People with LOPD report a significantly lower physical, psychological, and social quality of life (QoL) than the general population. <b>Objectives:</b> This study investigated how individuals' self-reported LOPD status (improving, stable, declining) relates to their QoL. Participant experiences such as use of mobility or ventilation aids, caregivers, symptomology, and daily life impacts were also characterized. <b>Methods:</b> A 2-part observational study was conducted online between October and December 2023 using the 36-item short-form tool (SF-36) and a survey. Adults with LOPD (N=41) from Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands were recruited. <b>Results:</b> Participants reporting \"declining\" LOPD status (56%) had lower physical functioning SF-36 scores than those reporting as \"stable\" or \"improving.\" Those self-reporting as stable or improving often described an acceptance of declining health in their responses. Physical functioning scores were generally stable in respondents who had been receiving enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for 1-15 years, but those who had received ERT for >15 years had lower scores. Requiring ventilation and mobility aids had additive negative impacts on physical functioning. Difficulty swallowing, speaking, and scoliosis were the most burdensome symptoms reported by those on ERT for >15-25 years. <b>Discussion:</b> These results demonstrate the humanistic burden of LOPD; through declining physical functioning SF-36 scores over increasing time and increased use of aids, and also through factors related to self-reported LOPD status (where declining status was associated with lower scores) and symptomology variances. Taken holistically, these areas are valuable to explore when informing optimized care. Among a largely declining cohort, even those not self-reporting decline often assumed future deterioration, highlighting the need for improved therapies and the potential to initiate or switch ERT based on evolving symptomology and daily life impacts. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our results indicate that progressing LOPD leads to loss of QoL in ways that relate to time, use of aids, evolving symptomology, and the patient's own perspective. A holistic approach to assessing the individual can help ensure relevant factors are investigated and held in balance, supporting optimized care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699855/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142931935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.126071
Jamshaed Siddiqui, Sally Bowditch
Background: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) are severe, treatment-refractory, epileptic encephalopathies that often develop in infancy or early childhood. Since December 1, 2022, plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) medicine (Epidyolex®; 100 mg/mL oral solution) has been reimbursed in the Netherlands for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with LGS or DS. Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of CBD plus usual care vs usual care alone in patients with LGS or DS in the Netherlands. Methods: A cohort-based Markov model from a Dutch societal perspective, based on seizure frequency and seizure-free days, was developed for patients receiving CBD plus usual care (antiseizure medications, including clobazam) or usual care alone. Population characteristics, clinical inputs, and utility values were sourced from CBD clinical trials and quality-of-life studies. Drug acquisition, disease management, adverse events, and societal costs from published literature were included. A 2019/2020 price year in euros was used. The model used a mean dosage of 12 mg/kg/day, a lifetime (90-year) horizon, and a 3-month cycle length. Discount rates of 4.0% and 1.5% per annum were applied to costs and outcomes, respectively. Uncertainty was explored through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: In patients with LGS, CBD plus usual care led to additional costs of €28 338 and increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 1.318 compared with usual care alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €21 493/QALY in LGS is below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €80 000/QALY in the Netherlands. In patients with DS, CBD plus usual care dominated usual care alone, with cost savings of €23 642 and increased QALYs of 0.868. The probability that CBD plus usual care is cost-effective in the Netherlands compared with usual care alone is 96% and 99% in patients with LGS and DS, respectively. Discussion: Elicitation methods were used to address data gaps in model inputs (eg, healthcare resource utilization and utilities); Dutch clinical experts, sensitivity, and scenario analyses validated this approach. Conclusions: Based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80 000, the base case cost-utility analysis demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of CBD plus usual care in patients with treatment-refractory LGS or DS aged 2 years or older in the Netherlands.
{"title":"Cost-Utility Analysis of Add-on Cannabidiol vs Usual Care Alone for the Treatment of Seizures in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome or Dravet Syndrome in the Netherlands.","authors":"Jamshaed Siddiqui, Sally Bowditch","doi":"10.36469/001c.126071","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.126071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) are severe, treatment-refractory, epileptic encephalopathies that often develop in infancy or early childhood. Since December 1, 2022, plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) medicine (Epidyolex®; 100 mg/mL oral solution) has been reimbursed in the Netherlands for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with LGS or DS. <b>Objective:</b> To estimate the cost-effectiveness of CBD plus usual care vs usual care alone in patients with LGS or DS in the Netherlands. <b>Methods:</b> A cohort-based Markov model from a Dutch societal perspective, based on seizure frequency and seizure-free days, was developed for patients receiving CBD plus usual care (antiseizure medications, including clobazam) or usual care alone. Population characteristics, clinical inputs, and utility values were sourced from CBD clinical trials and quality-of-life studies. Drug acquisition, disease management, adverse events, and societal costs from published literature were included. A 2019/2020 price year in euros was used. The model used a mean dosage of 12 mg/kg/day, a lifetime (90-year) horizon, and a 3-month cycle length. Discount rates of 4.0% and 1.5% per annum were applied to costs and outcomes, respectively. Uncertainty was explored through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. <b>Results:</b> In patients with LGS, CBD plus usual care led to additional costs of €28 338 and increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 1.318 compared with usual care alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €21 493/QALY in LGS is below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €80 000/QALY in the Netherlands. In patients with DS, CBD plus usual care dominated usual care alone, with cost savings of €23 642 and increased QALYs of 0.868. The probability that CBD plus usual care is cost-effective in the Netherlands compared with usual care alone is 96% and 99% in patients with LGS and DS, respectively. <b>Discussion:</b> Elicitation methods were used to address data gaps in model inputs (eg, healthcare resource utilization and utilities); Dutch clinical experts, sensitivity, and scenario analyses validated this approach. <b>Conclusions:</b> Based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80 000, the base case cost-utility analysis demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of CBD plus usual care in patients with treatment-refractory LGS or DS aged 2 years or older in the Netherlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"168-179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686597/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.124367
Prachi Bhatt, Jared Hirsch, Paul Cockrum, George Kim, Gabriela Dieguez
<p><p><b>Background:</b> Rising oncology healthcare costs have led to value-based care reimbursement models that coordinate care and improve quality while reducing overall spending. These models are increasingly important for traditional Medicare and other payers. <b>Objectives:</b> To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs), AE-associated excess costs, and total cost of care (TCOC) of 3 cohorts receiving first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective analysis of administrative claims data from 2018 to 2022 using the Medicare 100% Research Identifiable Files. We examined 3 cohorts receiving mPDAC treatment: FOLFIRINOX (FFX) (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, 5-FU bolus and infusion); modified FFX, (5-FU infusion only); and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (gem/abrax). We compared the incidence of clinically significant AEs, TCOC, components of TCOC, and costs related to AEs/treatment toxicity. <b>Results:</b> Patient AE rates ranged from 6.2% to 51.7%. AEs occurred more frequently in patients receiving FFX with all 4 components. Patients receiving brand name gem/abrax had lower rates of febrile neutropenia (6.2%) and neutropenia (22.2%) than those receiving FFX with no 5-FU bolus (febrile neutropenia, 9.9%; neutropenia, 36.9%) and FFX with all 4 components (febrile neutropenia, 6.9%; neutropenia, 30.4%). Rates of most nonhematologic AEs were higher in patients receiving FFX with all 4 components, with diarrhea occurring in 28.3%, abdominal pain in 31.5%, and nausea/vomiting in 41.5% of patients. TCOC was lower in the gem/abrax cohort: <math><mn>6505</mn> <mi>v</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>F</mi> <mi>F</mi> <mi>X</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mn>5</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>(</mo></math> 6995) and FFX with all 4 components ( <math><mn>7142</mn> <mo>)</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi></math> 5993 per administration,
背景:不断上升的肿瘤医疗保健费用导致了基于价值的护理报销模式,协调护理和提高质量,同时减少总体支出。这些模式对传统医疗保险和其他支付者越来越重要。目的:比较3个队列接受转移性胰腺导管腺癌(mPDAC)一线治疗的不良事件(ae)发生率、ae相关的超额费用和总护理成本(TCOC)。方法:我们使用医疗保险100%研究可识别文件对2018年至2022年的行政索赔数据进行回顾性分析。我们检查了3个接受mPDAC治疗的队列:FOLFIRINOX (FFX)(奥沙利铂、伊立替康、亚叶酸素、5-FU丸和输注);改良的FFX(仅5-FU输注);吉西他滨/nab-紫杉醇(gem/abrax)。我们比较了临床显著ae的发生率、TCOC、TCOC成分以及与ae /治疗毒性相关的费用。结果:AE发生率为6.2% ~ 51.7%。所有4种成分均接受FFX治疗的患者发生不良事件的频率更高。接受gem/abrax品牌治疗的患者发热性中性粒细胞减少率(6.2%)和中性粒细胞减少率(22.2%)低于接受FFX治疗但不服用5-FU的患者(发热性中性粒细胞减少,9.9%;中性粒细胞减少症,36.9%)和所有4种成分的FFX(发热性中性粒细胞减少症,6.9%;嗜中性白血球减少症,30.4%)。所有4种成分均接受FFX治疗的患者中,大多数非血液学不良事件发生率较高,其中腹泻发生率为28.3%,腹痛发生率为31.5%,恶心/呕吐发生率为41.5%。TCOC较低的宝石/ abrax群:6505 v s F F X w i t h n o 5 - F U l b o s(6995)和FFX所有4组件(7142)p e r d m我n s t r t i o n。T h e d e v e l o p m e n T o f n y s T u i e d h e m T o d l o g i c a e w s s s o c i T e d w i T h m e n e x c e s s c o s T o f 5993 /政府,而任何的发展研究nonhematological AE与平均per-administration超过3665美元的成本。讨论:如果目标是降低TCOC,以最小化化疗费用为目的的治疗决策可能导致次优决策。我们的研究表明,FFX比gem/abrax更昂贵(每次给药的TCOC)。接受gem/abrax治疗的患者年龄较大,基线Charlson合并症指数评分较高;然而,在造成成本差异方面,其他因素可能也很重要。结论:无论药物成本如何,化疗导致ae显著增加与较高的TCOC相关。
{"title":"The Effects of Adverse Events and Associated Costs on Value-Based Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Prachi Bhatt, Jared Hirsch, Paul Cockrum, George Kim, Gabriela Dieguez","doi":"10.36469/001c.124367","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.124367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Rising oncology healthcare costs have led to value-based care reimbursement models that coordinate care and improve quality while reducing overall spending. These models are increasingly important for traditional Medicare and other payers. <b>Objectives:</b> To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs), AE-associated excess costs, and total cost of care (TCOC) of 3 cohorts receiving first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective analysis of administrative claims data from 2018 to 2022 using the Medicare 100% Research Identifiable Files. We examined 3 cohorts receiving mPDAC treatment: FOLFIRINOX (FFX) (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, 5-FU bolus and infusion); modified FFX, (5-FU infusion only); and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (gem/abrax). We compared the incidence of clinically significant AEs, TCOC, components of TCOC, and costs related to AEs/treatment toxicity. <b>Results:</b> Patient AE rates ranged from 6.2% to 51.7%. AEs occurred more frequently in patients receiving FFX with all 4 components. Patients receiving brand name gem/abrax had lower rates of febrile neutropenia (6.2%) and neutropenia (22.2%) than those receiving FFX with no 5-FU bolus (febrile neutropenia, 9.9%; neutropenia, 36.9%) and FFX with all 4 components (febrile neutropenia, 6.9%; neutropenia, 30.4%). Rates of most nonhematologic AEs were higher in patients receiving FFX with all 4 components, with diarrhea occurring in 28.3%, abdominal pain in 31.5%, and nausea/vomiting in 41.5% of patients. TCOC was lower in the gem/abrax cohort: <math><mn>6505</mn> <mi>v</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>F</mi> <mi>F</mi> <mi>X</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mn>5</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>(</mo></math> 6995) and FFX with all 4 components ( <math><mn>7142</mn> <mo>)</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi></math> 5993 per administration, ","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"161-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664866/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142882196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.36469/001c.125251
Anne M Sydor, Esteban Rivera, Robert Popovian
Background: The Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program allows the federal government to negotiate caps for select medications. These price caps may reduce revenue for the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that negotiate the actual price paid for medicines in the U.S. To offset the resulting pressure on their profit margins, it is possible that PBMs would, in turn, increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines with capped prices. The model presented here evaluates how increased out-of-pocket costs for the anticoagulants apixaban (Eliquis) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto) could impact patients financially and clinically. Methods: Copay distributions for all 2023 prescription fills for apixaban and rivaroxaban managed by the 3 largest PBMs, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts International, and Optum Rx, were used to approximate current copay costs. Increased out-of-pocket costs were modeled as a shift of all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest copay tier. The known linear relationship between copay costs and treatment abandonment was used to calculate the potential resulting increase in treatment abandonment. Known rates of morbidity and mortality due to abandoning anticoagulants were used to estimate resulting increases in morbidity and mortality. Results: If the 3 largest PBMs all shifted costs onto patients by moving all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest formulary tier, Tier 6, patients' copay amount would increase by 482 million for apixaban and 206 million for rivaroxaban. Such an increase could lead to 169 000 to 228 000 patients abandoning apixaban and 71 000 to 93 000 abandoning rivaroxaban. The resulting morbidity and mortality could include up to an additional 145 000 major cardiovascular events and up to 97 000 more deaths. Conclusion: The Medicare Price Negotiation Program could impact patients negatively if it causes PBMs to increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines. Policymakers should closely monitor changes in overall affordability, including all patient out-of-pocket expenditures, for medications in the program. Preemptive measures should be considered to ensure that the most vulnerable citizens are not placed in precarious situations, leading to poorer health outcomes.
{"title":"Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?","authors":"Anne M Sydor, Esteban Rivera, Robert Popovian","doi":"10.36469/001c.125251","DOIUrl":"10.36469/001c.125251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program allows the federal government to negotiate caps for select medications. These price caps may reduce revenue for the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that negotiate the actual price paid for medicines in the U.S. To offset the resulting pressure on their profit margins, it is possible that PBMs would, in turn, increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines with capped prices. The model presented here evaluates how increased out-of-pocket costs for the anticoagulants apixaban (Eliquis) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto) could impact patients financially and clinically. <b>Methods:</b> Copay distributions for all 2023 prescription fills for apixaban and rivaroxaban managed by the 3 largest PBMs, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts International, and Optum Rx, were used to approximate current copay costs. Increased out-of-pocket costs were modeled as a shift of all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest copay tier. The known linear relationship between copay costs and treatment abandonment was used to calculate the potential resulting increase in treatment abandonment. Known rates of morbidity and mortality due to abandoning anticoagulants were used to estimate resulting increases in morbidity and mortality. <b>Results:</b> If the 3 largest PBMs all shifted costs onto patients by moving all apixaban and rivaroxaban prescriptions to the highest formulary tier, Tier 6, patients' copay amount would increase by <math><mn>235</mn> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi></math> 482 million for apixaban and <math><mn>105</mn> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi></math> 206 million for rivaroxaban. Such an increase could lead to 169 000 to 228 000 patients abandoning apixaban and 71 000 to 93 000 abandoning rivaroxaban. The resulting morbidity and mortality could include up to an additional 145 000 major cardiovascular events and up to 97 000 more deaths. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Medicare Price Negotiation Program could impact patients negatively if it causes PBMs to increase patients' out-of-pocket costs for medicines. Policymakers should closely monitor changes in overall affordability, including all patient out-of-pocket expenditures, for medications in the program. Preemptive measures should be considered to ensure that the most vulnerable citizens are not placed in precarious situations, leading to poorer health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612897/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}