Pub Date : 2025-08-30DOI: 10.1177/08919887251375475
Sydney C Sullivan, Melissa G Zammitti, Taylor Maynard, Kunal Mankodiya, Nicholas Constant, Laura E Korthauer, Brian R Ott, Charles Denby, Alyssa N De Vito, Geoffrey Tremont
ObjectiveThis study evaluated the usability of the Rhode Island Mobile Cognitive Assessment Tool (RIMCAT), a proctored digital cognitive screening measure to assess its potential for self-administration.Methods100 participants (Healthy Controls [HC] n = 50; Cognitively Impaired [CI] n = 50) were recruited, and 90 completed the RIMCAT twice, with verbal prompts when necessary. Participants then completed an exit survey regarding their experience.ResultsAll HC completed the RIMCAT, but four CI individuals could not. Most finished in under 30 min. HC (M = 2.18, SD = 1.93) required significantly fewer prompts during the first RIMCAT administration compared to the CI group (M = 3.82, SD = 2.87). Both groups needed fewer prompts on the second visit, with prompts often related to input methods, button use, and instruction comprehension.ConclusionsThe RIMCAT shows promise for self-administration, particularly with minor modifications that could improve clarity, interface design, and user experience for optimal usability and self-administration.
目的本研究评估罗德岛移动认知评估工具(RIMCAT)的可用性,这是一种监控的数字认知筛查措施,以评估其自我管理的潜力。方法招募100名受试者(健康对照组[HC] n = 50;认知障碍[CI] n = 50),其中90名受试者完成两次RIMCAT,必要时给予口头提示。然后,参与者完成了一份关于他们经历的离职调查。结果HC组均能完成RIMCAT, CI组有4例不能完成。大多数在30分钟内完成。与CI组(M = 3.82, SD = 2.87)相比,HC组(M = 2.18, SD = 1.93)在第一次给药时需要的提示显著减少。两组在第二次访问时都需要更少的提示,提示通常与输入法、按钮使用和指令理解有关。结论:RIMCAT显示了自我管理的希望,特别是通过微小的修改可以提高清晰度,界面设计和用户体验,以实现最佳的可用性和自我管理。
{"title":"Usability of the Rhode Island Mobile Cognitive Assessment Tool for Self-Administration in Detecting Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults.","authors":"Sydney C Sullivan, Melissa G Zammitti, Taylor Maynard, Kunal Mankodiya, Nicholas Constant, Laura E Korthauer, Brian R Ott, Charles Denby, Alyssa N De Vito, Geoffrey Tremont","doi":"10.1177/08919887251375475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251375475","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study evaluated the usability of the Rhode Island Mobile Cognitive Assessment Tool (RIMCAT), a proctored digital cognitive screening measure to assess its potential for self-administration.Methods100 participants (Healthy Controls [HC] <i>n</i> = 50; Cognitively Impaired [CI] <i>n</i> = 50) were recruited, and 90 completed the RIMCAT twice, with verbal prompts when necessary. Participants then completed an exit survey regarding their experience.ResultsAll HC completed the RIMCAT, but four CI individuals could not. Most finished in under 30 min. HC (M = 2.18, SD = 1.93) required significantly fewer prompts during the first RIMCAT administration compared to the CI group (M = 3.82, SD = 2.87). Both groups needed fewer prompts on the second visit, with prompts often related to input methods, button use, and instruction comprehension.ConclusionsThe RIMCAT shows promise for self-administration, particularly with minor modifications that could improve clarity, interface design, and user experience for optimal usability and self-administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251375475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-28DOI: 10.1177/08919887251371725
Anna Tjin, Leng Leng Thang, Harsharon Kaur Sondh, Robert Stewart
IntroductionThe global rise in dementia presents significant challenges for healthcare systems. While Alzheimer's disease (AD) dominates dementia care, people with non-Alzheimer's dementias (non-AD), such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), vascular dementia (VD), and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), often have distinct and unmet healthcare needs.AimThis systematic review aimed to summarise evidence on healthcare utilisation (HCU) patterns and factors affecting care among people living with non-AD dementias.MethodsFollowing a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD42024568391), comprehensive searches of Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycINFO, and PubMed were conducted in February and June 2024. Peer-reviewed English-language studies reporting on HCU or its determinants in DLB, FTD, VD, or PDD were included. Reviews, case reports, grey literature, and studies without subtype-specific data were excluded. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsThirty-one studies (16 cohort; 10 cross-sectional, 4 case-description, and 1 chart review) were included. HCU varied by dementia subtype and was influenced by sociodemographic, cognitive, and clinical factors. Compared with AD, non-AD dementias had higher healthcare use and costs. PDD showed the highest inpatient, outpatient, and skilled nursing care use, driven by severe cognitive decline. DLB was linked to unplanned hospital admissions and frequent ambulance use, often due to falls and pneumonia. FTD resulted in extended hospital stays related to behavioural symptoms, while VD incurred high costs due to chronic comorbidities and long-term care needs.ConclusionPeople with non-AD dementias have greater and distinct healthcare needs. Future research should develop standardised measures and tailored interventions to address their complex socioeconomic and clinical requirements.
{"title":"Healthcare Service Utilisation of People Living With Non-Alzheimer's Dementia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Anna Tjin, Leng Leng Thang, Harsharon Kaur Sondh, Robert Stewart","doi":"10.1177/08919887251371725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251371725","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe global rise in dementia presents significant challenges for healthcare systems. While Alzheimer's disease (AD) dominates dementia care, people with non-Alzheimer's dementias (non-AD), such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), vascular dementia (VD), and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), often have distinct and unmet healthcare needs.AimThis systematic review aimed to summarise evidence on healthcare utilisation (HCU) patterns and factors affecting care among people living with non-AD dementias.MethodsFollowing a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD42024568391), comprehensive searches of Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycINFO, and PubMed were conducted in February and June 2024. Peer-reviewed English-language studies reporting on HCU or its determinants in DLB, FTD, VD, or PDD were included. Reviews, case reports, grey literature, and studies without subtype-specific data were excluded. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsThirty-one studies (16 cohort; 10 cross-sectional, 4 case-description, and 1 chart review) were included. HCU varied by dementia subtype and was influenced by sociodemographic, cognitive, and clinical factors. Compared with AD, non-AD dementias had higher healthcare use and costs. PDD showed the highest inpatient, outpatient, and skilled nursing care use, driven by severe cognitive decline. DLB was linked to unplanned hospital admissions and frequent ambulance use, often due to falls and pneumonia. FTD resulted in extended hospital stays related to behavioural symptoms, while VD incurred high costs due to chronic comorbidities and long-term care needs.ConclusionPeople with non-AD dementias have greater and distinct healthcare needs. Future research should develop standardised measures and tailored interventions to address their complex socioeconomic and clinical requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251371725"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1177/08919887251369893
Anderson Matheus Pereira da Silva, Luciano Falcão, Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro, Kenzo Ogasawara Donato, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Maria da Vitória Santos Nascimento, Marianna Leite, Mariana Lee Han, Daniel Gonçalves Quiroga, Eryvelton de Souza Franco, Maria Bernadete de Sousa Maia
BackgroundAgitation is a frequent and distressing neuropsychiatric symptom in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), often leading to increased caregiver burden, institutionalization, and healthcare costs. While antipsychotics are commonly prescribed, their use is limited by safety concerns. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as citalopram and escitalopram, have emerged as alternative treatments with a more favorable safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these agents in the management of agitation in AD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing citalopram or escitalopram with placebo or other pharmacological treatments in older adults with AD and clinically defined agitation. Primary outcomes included changes in agitation severity, assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician Rating (NPI-C) and the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS). Secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MMSE), anxiety symptoms, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFour RCTs comprising 502 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant improvement in agitation severity (SMD -0.67; 95% CI -2.58, 1.25; I2 = 98.3%) or cognitive outcomes (SMD 2.43; 95% CI -2.55, 7.41). Rates of serious adverse events (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.50, 1.45) and treatment discontinuation (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80, 1.37) were similar between groups. However, SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of falls (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15, 2.75; I2 = 0%).ConclusionEscitalopram and citalopram do not significantly reduce agitation in AD but are generally well tolerated. Increased fall risk warrants cautious clinical use.Registration PROSPERO protocol numberCRD420251055237.
背景:躁动是阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者中一种常见且令人痛苦的神经精神症状,通常会导致照顾者负担增加、制度化和医疗费用增加。虽然抗精神病药物通常被开处方,但出于安全考虑,它们的使用受到限制。选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs),如西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰,已成为具有更有利的安全性的替代治疗方案。本研究旨在评估这些药物在AD躁动治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法:我们对比较西酞普兰或艾司西酞普兰与安慰剂或其他药物治疗老年AD伴临床躁动的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。主要结果包括躁动严重程度的变化,由神经精神病学量表-临床医师评分(NPI-C)和神经行为评定量表(NBRS)评估。次要结局包括认知功能(MMSE)、焦虑症状和不良事件。采用随机效应模型合并标准化平均差(SMD)和风险比(RR)。结果纳入4项随机对照试验,共502例患者。合并分析显示躁动严重程度(SMD -0.67; 95% CI -2.58, 1.25; I2 = 98.3%)或认知结果(SMD 2.43; 95% CI -2.55, 7.41)无显著改善。两组间严重不良事件发生率(RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.50, 1.45)和停药率(RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80, 1.37)相似。然而,SSRI使用与跌倒风险增加相关(RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15, 2.75; I2 = 0%)。结论艾司西酞普兰和西酞普兰不能显著减少AD患者的躁动,但耐受性良好。增加跌倒风险需要谨慎临床使用。普洛斯佩罗协议号crd420251055237。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram and Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Anderson Matheus Pereira da Silva, Luciano Falcão, Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro, Kenzo Ogasawara Donato, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Maria da Vitória Santos Nascimento, Marianna Leite, Mariana Lee Han, Daniel Gonçalves Quiroga, Eryvelton de Souza Franco, Maria Bernadete de Sousa Maia","doi":"10.1177/08919887251369893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251369893","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAgitation is a frequent and distressing neuropsychiatric symptom in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), often leading to increased caregiver burden, institutionalization, and healthcare costs. While antipsychotics are commonly prescribed, their use is limited by safety concerns. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as citalopram and escitalopram, have emerged as alternative treatments with a more favorable safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these agents in the management of agitation in AD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing citalopram or escitalopram with placebo or other pharmacological treatments in older adults with AD and clinically defined agitation. Primary outcomes included changes in agitation severity, assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician Rating (NPI-C) and the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS). Secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MMSE), anxiety symptoms, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFour RCTs comprising 502 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant improvement in agitation severity (SMD -0.67; 95% CI -2.58, 1.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.3%) or cognitive outcomes (SMD 2.43; 95% CI -2.55, 7.41). Rates of serious adverse events (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.50, 1.45) and treatment discontinuation (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80, 1.37) were similar between groups. However, SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of falls (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15, 2.75; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).ConclusionEscitalopram and citalopram do not significantly reduce agitation in AD but are generally well tolerated. Increased fall risk warrants cautious clinical use.Registration PROSPERO protocol numberCRD420251055237.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251369893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1177/08919887251370398
Yağmur Özbek, Görsev G Yener
BackgroundLate-life depression often co-occurs with neurological disorders such as dementia, significantly impacting cognitive function and overall well-being. Mild cognitive impairment represents a critical stage between normal aging and dementia, often accompanied by depressive symptoms. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a non-invasive method to investigate underlying neural mechanisms associated with depressive symptoms and cognitive dysfunction.MethodsThis study included 80 participants categorized into four groups: MCI without depressive symptoms (MCI), MCI with depressive symptoms (MCI-d), cognitively unimpaired individuals without depressive symptoms (CU), and cognitively unimpaired individuals with depressive symptoms (CU-d). Participants underwent neuropsychological evaluations and EEG recordings during a visual oddball paradigm. Event-related oscillations (EROs) in delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequencies were analyzed in frontal, central, parietal, temporal, and occipital electrode locations.ResultsDelta ERO showed a significant decrease in amplitude in CU-d, MCI, and MCI-d groups compared to CU in frontal, central, and parietal regions. In the temporal area, MCI-d exhibited lower delta amplitudes compared to both CU and CU-d, while MCI showed lower amplitudes compared to CU. No significant differences were observed in theta, alpha, and beta frequencies. Correlation analyses revealed moderate to strong associations between frontal, central, parietal, and temporal delta amplitudes with various neuropsychological test scores, indicating a link between delta oscillations and cognitive function.DiscussionOur findings suggest that delta oscillations may serve as potential marker for cognitive dysfunction, particularly in individuals with MCI and depressive symptoms. Notably, lower delta amplitudes were observed in cognitively unimpaired individuals with depressive symptoms compared to those without, underlining the impact of depressive symptoms on cognitive function in healthy elderly individuals. Further studies can bring out that neurophysiological measures may help revealing the effect of depressive symptoms on cognition that was undetected by cognitive testing.
{"title":"Understanding Effects of Late-Life Depressive Symptoms on Event-Related Oscillations in Cognitively Unimpaired Seniors and Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Yağmur Özbek, Görsev G Yener","doi":"10.1177/08919887251370398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251370398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLate-life depression often co-occurs with neurological disorders such as dementia, significantly impacting cognitive function and overall well-being. Mild cognitive impairment represents a critical stage between normal aging and dementia, often accompanied by depressive symptoms. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a non-invasive method to investigate underlying neural mechanisms associated with depressive symptoms and cognitive dysfunction.MethodsThis study included 80 participants categorized into four groups: MCI without depressive symptoms (MCI), MCI with depressive symptoms (MCI-d), cognitively unimpaired individuals without depressive symptoms (CU), and cognitively unimpaired individuals with depressive symptoms (CU-d). Participants underwent neuropsychological evaluations and EEG recordings during a visual oddball paradigm. Event-related oscillations (EROs) in delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequencies were analyzed in frontal, central, parietal, temporal, and occipital electrode locations.ResultsDelta ERO showed a significant decrease in amplitude in CU-d, MCI, and MCI-d groups compared to CU in frontal, central, and parietal regions. In the temporal area, MCI-d exhibited lower delta amplitudes compared to both CU and CU-d, while MCI showed lower amplitudes compared to CU. No significant differences were observed in theta, alpha, and beta frequencies. Correlation analyses revealed moderate to strong associations between frontal, central, parietal, and temporal delta amplitudes with various neuropsychological test scores, indicating a link between delta oscillations and cognitive function.DiscussionOur findings suggest that delta oscillations may serve as potential marker for cognitive dysfunction, particularly in individuals with MCI and depressive symptoms. Notably, lower delta amplitudes were observed in cognitively unimpaired individuals with depressive symptoms compared to those without, underlining the impact of depressive symptoms on cognitive function in healthy elderly individuals. Further studies can bring out that neurophysiological measures may help revealing the effect of depressive symptoms on cognition that was undetected by cognitive testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251370398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-18DOI: 10.1177/08919887251366698
Oscar R Kronenberger, Alyssa N Kaser, Jeff Schaffert, Vishal J Thakkar, William Goette, Christian LoBue, Laura H Lacritz
ObjectiveThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Memory Index Score (MIS) is a supplemental assessment of memory composed of word list delayed free-recall followed by step-down category cued- and multiple-choice cued-recall. This paper reviews the MIS literature within Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative dementias to synthesize evidence regarding its clinical utility, identify gaps, and inform future research directions.MethodWe searched electronic databases of OVID Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed from 2014, when the MIS was first described, to July 2025. Peer-reviewed studies that reported data on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS in assessing neurodegenerative dementia populations were included.ResultsWe screened 278 articles, and 14 were included in the review. The current literature includes limited reporting on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS and is characterized by minimal diversity of samples and non-rigorous validation methods. Initial findings are promising and suggestive of incremental validity over the MoCA total score for identifying episodic memory impairment and therefore aiding in differentiation of suspected dementia etiology. However, evidence is insubstantial for the MIS as a tool for predicting progression and additional research is needed to evaluate the incremental validity of the MIS over the conventional MoCA five-word recall score.ConclusionsLarge literature gaps exist regarding the clinical utility of the MIS within neurodegenerative dementias. Additional research exploring the psychometric properties of the MIS using diverse samples with rigorous validation methods is needed to better inform its application.
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Clinical Utility from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score.","authors":"Oscar R Kronenberger, Alyssa N Kaser, Jeff Schaffert, Vishal J Thakkar, William Goette, Christian LoBue, Laura H Lacritz","doi":"10.1177/08919887251366698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251366698","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Memory Index Score (MIS) is a supplemental assessment of memory composed of word list delayed free-recall followed by step-down category cued- and multiple-choice cued-recall. This paper reviews the MIS literature within Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative dementias to synthesize evidence regarding its clinical utility, identify gaps, and inform future research directions.MethodWe searched electronic databases of OVID Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed from 2014, when the MIS was first described, to July 2025. Peer-reviewed studies that reported data on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS in assessing neurodegenerative dementia populations were included.ResultsWe screened 278 articles, and 14 were included in the review. The current literature includes limited reporting on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS and is characterized by minimal diversity of samples and non-rigorous validation methods. Initial findings are promising and suggestive of incremental validity over the MoCA total score for identifying episodic memory impairment and therefore aiding in differentiation of suspected dementia etiology. However, evidence is insubstantial for the MIS as a tool for predicting progression and additional research is needed to evaluate the incremental validity of the MIS over the conventional MoCA five-word recall score.ConclusionsLarge literature gaps exist regarding the clinical utility of the MIS within neurodegenerative dementias. Additional research exploring the psychometric properties of the MIS using diverse samples with rigorous validation methods is needed to better inform its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251366698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144873509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.1177/08919887251366634
Rebeca Leon, Maryam Ghahremani, Dylan X Guan, Eric E Smith, Henrik Zetterberg, Zahinoor Ismail
BackgroundAs the prevalence of Alzheimer disease (AD) rises, early identification of at-risk individuals is essential for effective intervention. Mild behavioral impairment (MBI), which captures emergent and persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in later life, may enhance early detection of AD; however, its associations with 2024 NIA-AA Core 1 biomarkers remain unexplored. We investigated associations between MBI and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid β-42 (Aβ42) and phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181).MethodBaseline data from 1327 dementia-free Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants were analyzed. Participants were classified as MBI, non-MBI NPS, or no NPS. Gaussian mixture modeling defined biomarker positivity. Logistic and multinomial logistic regressions modeled associations between NPS status and biomarker positivity or biomarker profiles, adjusting for age, sex, education, and cognition.ResultsMBI was associated with Aβ42+ (aOR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.71-2.99), p-tau181+ (aOR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.30-2.28), and AD continuum profile (aOR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.73-3.14), but not with non-AD pathology. Non-MBI NPS showed no associations.ConclusionMBI may serve as a behavioral marker of AD pathology.
随着阿尔茨海默病(AD)患病率的上升,早期识别高危个体对于有效干预至关重要。轻度行为障碍(MBI),可以捕捉到生命后期出现的和持续的神经精神症状(NPS),可以增强对阿尔茨海默病的早期发现;然而,其与2024 NIA-AA Core 1生物标志物的关联仍未被探索。我们研究了MBI与脑脊液(CSF)淀粉样蛋白β-42 (Aβ42)和磷酸化tau-181 (p-tau181)之间的关系。方法分析1327名无痴呆阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)参与者的基线数据。参与者被分为MBI、非MBI NPS和无NPS。高斯混合模型定义生物标志物阳性。Logistic和多项Logistic回归模拟了NPS状态与生物标志物阳性或生物标志物谱之间的关联,调整了年龄、性别、教育和认知。结果smbi与a - β42+相关(aOR = 2.26;95% CI = 1.71-2.99), p-tau181+ (aOR = 1.72;95% CI = 1.30-2.28), AD连续谱(aOR = 2.33;95% CI = 1.73-3.14),但与非ad病理无关。非mbi NPS则无关联。结论mbi可作为AD病理的行为标志物。
{"title":"Enhancing Alzheimer Disease Detection Using Neuropsychiatric Symptoms: The Role of Mild Behavioural Impairment in the Revised NIA-AA Research Framework.","authors":"Rebeca Leon, Maryam Ghahremani, Dylan X Guan, Eric E Smith, Henrik Zetterberg, Zahinoor Ismail","doi":"10.1177/08919887251366634","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251366634","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAs the prevalence of Alzheimer disease (AD) rises, early identification of at-risk individuals is essential for effective intervention. Mild behavioral impairment (MBI), which captures emergent and persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in later life, may enhance early detection of AD; however, its associations with 2024 NIA-AA Core 1 biomarkers remain unexplored. We investigated associations between MBI and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid β-42 (Aβ42) and phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181).MethodBaseline data from 1327 dementia-free Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants were analyzed. Participants were classified as MBI, non-MBI NPS, or no NPS. Gaussian mixture modeling defined biomarker positivity. Logistic and multinomial logistic regressions modeled associations between NPS status and biomarker positivity or biomarker profiles, adjusting for age, sex, education, and cognition.ResultsMBI was associated with Aβ42+ (aOR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.71-2.99), p-tau181+ (aOR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.30-2.28), and AD continuum profile (aOR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.73-3.14), but not with non-AD pathology. Non-MBI NPS showed no associations.ConclusionMBI may serve as a behavioral marker of AD pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251366634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144847121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-12DOI: 10.1177/08919887251366638
Benjamin Ellul, Angus McNamara, Stephan Laurenz, Irina Baetu, Mark Jenkinson, Lyndsey E Collins-Praino
Background: Although primarily characterised as a motor disorder, Parkinson's Disease (PD) also presents with non-motor symptoms, including cognitive decline and affective dysfunction, which are major predictors of quality of life and mortality for individuals. However, factors associated with these non-motor symptom trajectories remain under-characterised. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate predictors of cognitive and affective function over a 5-year follow-up period using data from the Progressive Parkinson's Marker Initiative. Results: Fuzzy C-means clustering analysis of year-5 cognitive and affective function scores showed two clusters. The second group (n = 96) were older and had worse cognition, affective, and motor functioning at year-5 follow-up compared to the first (n = 213). Predictors of cluster membership was assessed in n = 113 individuals for whom data on all variables of interest were available (cluster 1/2 = 79/34). Cluster membership at 5-year follow-up was significantly predicted by baseline cognitive and affective function, as well as decreased levels of CSF amyloid-beta and increased CSF concentrations of phosphorylated-tau at baseline. Alternative non-linear supervised machine learning model (support vector regressor) using the same predictors improved classification accuracy by 5%. Conclusion: Our analysis highlights that including established biomarkers of other neurocognitive disorders (namely, amyloid-beta and phosphorylated-tau) also has utility for predicting cognitive and affective trajectory in PD. This suggests that assessing a multi-modal panel of prognostic markers, beyond clinical symptom presentation alone, may have utility for informing prognosis of cognitive and affective outcomes in PD. This is significant, potentially allowing for the earlier development of personalised therapeutic interventions for those at highest risk of impairment within these non-motor domains.
{"title":"Predicting Cognition and Affective Changes in Newly Diagnosed Parkinson's Disease Through Longitudinal Data-Driven Clustering.","authors":"Benjamin Ellul, Angus McNamara, Stephan Laurenz, Irina Baetu, Mark Jenkinson, Lyndsey E Collins-Praino","doi":"10.1177/08919887251366638","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251366638","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although primarily characterised as a motor disorder, Parkinson's Disease (PD) also presents with non-motor symptoms, including cognitive decline and affective dysfunction, which are major predictors of quality of life and mortality for individuals. However, factors associated with these non-motor symptom trajectories remain under-characterised. <b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to investigate predictors of cognitive and affective function over a 5-year follow-up period using data from the Progressive Parkinson's Marker Initiative. <b>Results:</b> Fuzzy C-means clustering analysis of year-5 cognitive and affective function scores showed two clusters. The second group (n = 96) were older and had worse cognition, affective, and motor functioning at year-5 follow-up compared to the first (n = 213). Predictors of cluster membership was assessed in n = 113 individuals for whom data on all variables of interest were available (cluster 1/2 = 79/34). Cluster membership at 5-year follow-up was significantly predicted by baseline cognitive and affective function, as well as decreased levels of CSF amyloid-beta and increased CSF concentrations of phosphorylated-tau at baseline. Alternative non-linear supervised machine learning model (support vector regressor) using the same predictors improved classification accuracy by 5%. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our analysis highlights that including established biomarkers of other neurocognitive disorders (namely, amyloid-beta and phosphorylated-tau) also has utility for predicting cognitive and affective trajectory in PD. This suggests that assessing a multi-modal panel of prognostic markers, beyond clinical symptom presentation alone, may have utility for informing prognosis of cognitive and affective outcomes in PD. This is significant, potentially allowing for the earlier development of personalised therapeutic interventions for those at highest risk of impairment within these non-motor domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251366638"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144821558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1177/08919887251366637
Nathaniel A Shanok, Brittany Derbin, Sabrina Muzac, Enis Cabeza, Samuel Leven, Raul Rodriguez
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) represent two of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. Notably, it is estimated that 30%-50% of individuals with AD have co-occurring MDD and there are overlapping symptoms across numerous domains. In this pilot study, a Deep TMS protocol (targeting the left frontal and bilateral temporal regions) was delivered for 36 sessions to patients with co-occurring MDD and early-stage AD (N = 12). All participants received the treatment and there was no control condition. The treatment yielded a response rate of 83.33% (defined by a ≥50% reduction in depressive symptoms on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and a remission rate of 50.00% (PHQ-9 score of 4 or less following treatment). Further, participants displayed reductions in left prefrontal and right temporal delta power using QEEG analysis pre- and -post treatment. Alpha coherence was also enhanced in key areas. The observed shift in neurophysiological measures suggested reduced cortical slowing and dysconnectivity, which are hallmark traits in MDD and AD. This proof-of-concept study suggests that further research on the application of Deep TMS (paired with QEEG) for early-stage AD is warranted.
{"title":"The Effects of Deep TMS on QEEG Measures in Co-Occurring Major Depressive Disorder and Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Nathaniel A Shanok, Brittany Derbin, Sabrina Muzac, Enis Cabeza, Samuel Leven, Raul Rodriguez","doi":"10.1177/08919887251366637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251366637","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) represent two of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. Notably, it is estimated that 30%-50% of individuals with AD have co-occurring MDD and there are overlapping symptoms across numerous domains. In this pilot study, a Deep TMS protocol (targeting the left frontal and bilateral temporal regions) was delivered for 36 sessions to patients with co-occurring MDD and early-stage AD (N = 12). All participants received the treatment and there was no control condition. The treatment yielded a response rate of 83.33% (defined by a ≥50% reduction in depressive symptoms on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and a remission rate of 50.00% (PHQ-9 score of 4 or less following treatment). Further, participants displayed reductions in left prefrontal and right temporal delta power using QEEG analysis pre- and -post treatment. Alpha coherence was also enhanced in key areas. The observed shift in neurophysiological measures suggested reduced cortical slowing and dysconnectivity, which are hallmark traits in MDD and AD. This proof-of-concept study suggests that further research on the application of Deep TMS (paired with QEEG) for early-stage AD is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251366637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144794613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1177/08919887251366639
Eric Mormont, Denis Jacques, Marie de Saint-Hubert, Aurore Sourdeau, Charlotte Beaudart
ObjectivesTo address the prevalence and risk factors of suicidal outcomes in people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia.MethodsFour databases were searched for studies reporting data on the prevalence or the risk of a suicidal event, in people with a clinical diagnosis of MCI or dementia. The research was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A narrative synthesis was used to report the main findings. A random effect model was used across all analyses to calculate the prevalence and the odds ratio of suicidal outcomes in people with dementia.ResultsFifty-nine studies were included. The pooled prevalence of suicidal outcomes in people with dementia were as follows: suicidal ideation: 9.7% (95%CI 6.7-13.9), suicide attempt: 0.8% (95%CI 0.3-2.4), and suicidal death: 0.2% (95%CI 0.1-0.4). People with dementia had an increased risk of suicidal ideation (OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.21-2.88) and suicide attempt (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.24-4.65) but no significant increase in the risk of suicidal death. The heterogeneity was high for each outcome. The risk factors for suicidal death in dementia were younger age, recent diagnosis, previous mental health disorder, and frontotemporal dementia. The prevalence of suicidal ideation in MCI ranged from 5 to 17.6%, with a moderate increase in suicide attempts (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.09-1.65) and no increase in suicidal death.ConclusionsPeople with dementia frequently have suicidal thoughts and are at an increased risk of suicide attempts. Clinicians should be careful to identify those at higher risk in order to offer them supportive care and restrict their access to lethal means.
{"title":"Suicidal Behavior in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in the Old Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Eric Mormont, Denis Jacques, Marie de Saint-Hubert, Aurore Sourdeau, Charlotte Beaudart","doi":"10.1177/08919887251366639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251366639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo address the prevalence and risk factors of suicidal outcomes in people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia.MethodsFour databases were searched for studies reporting data on the prevalence or the risk of a suicidal event, in people with a clinical diagnosis of MCI or dementia. The research was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A narrative synthesis was used to report the main findings. A random effect model was used across all analyses to calculate the prevalence and the odds ratio of suicidal outcomes in people with dementia.ResultsFifty-nine studies were included. The pooled prevalence of suicidal outcomes in people with dementia were as follows: suicidal ideation: 9.7% (95%CI 6.7-13.9), suicide attempt: 0.8% (95%CI 0.3-2.4), and suicidal death: 0.2% (95%CI 0.1-0.4). People with dementia had an increased risk of suicidal ideation (OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.21-2.88) and suicide attempt (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.24-4.65) but no significant increase in the risk of suicidal death. The heterogeneity was high for each outcome. The risk factors for suicidal death in dementia were younger age, recent diagnosis, previous mental health disorder, and frontotemporal dementia. The prevalence of suicidal ideation in MCI ranged from 5 to 17.6%, with a moderate increase in suicide attempts (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.09-1.65) and no increase in suicidal death.ConclusionsPeople with dementia frequently have suicidal thoughts and are at an increased risk of suicide attempts. Clinicians should be careful to identify those at higher risk in order to offer them supportive care and restrict their access to lethal means.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251366639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144789314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-19DOI: 10.1177/08919887251362468
Di-Hua Luo, Roee Holtzer
BackgroundPerceived fatigability-subjective physical or mental energy depletion within specified activity contexts-is prevalent in aging and neurological conditions. Although the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) is validated for older adults and those with multiple sclerosis (OAMS), its subscale cut-offs and clinical relevance for cognitive and mobility outcomes have not been examined in neurologically affected aging populations.MethodsWe studied 224 older adults (≥60 years): 109 OAMS and 115 controls who completed the PFS, neuropsychological testing, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and, for OAMS, the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed PFS subscales' accuracy in discriminating MS, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mobility impairment (SPPB ≤9), and worse MS-related disability (PDDS ≥2). Logistic regression adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates generated refined ROC curves and cut-offs.ResultsBoth PFS subscales demonstrated moderate accuracy (area under the curve 0.59-0.75) for discriminating MS, MCI, and mobility impairment when unadjusted, with accuracy often exceeding 0.80 after covariate adjustment. Among OAMS, mental fatigability more accurately identified MCI, whereas physical fatigability better detected worse MS-related disability. Cut-offs were higher in OAMS than in healthy controls, varying by subscale and clinical outcome. Adjusted analyses revealed nuances in cut-offs, with physical fatigability thresholds consistently higher than mental fatigability.ConclusionPFS subscales can identify MS, cognitive impairment, and mobility impairment in older adults. Cut-offs appear population- and outcome-specific, indicating that thresholds derived from healthy older cohorts may not apply directly to neurological populations. Covariate adjustment refines discriminative accuracy, potentially guiding need for further functional monitoring.
{"title":"Utilizing Perceived Fatigability to Identify Cognitive and Mobility Impairments in Aging and Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Di-Hua Luo, Roee Holtzer","doi":"10.1177/08919887251362468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251362468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPerceived fatigability-subjective physical or mental energy depletion within specified activity contexts-is prevalent in aging and neurological conditions. Although the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) is validated for older adults and those with multiple sclerosis (OAMS), its subscale cut-offs and clinical relevance for cognitive and mobility outcomes have not been examined in neurologically affected aging populations.MethodsWe studied 224 older adults (≥60 years): 109 OAMS and 115 controls who completed the PFS, neuropsychological testing, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and, for OAMS, the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed PFS subscales' accuracy in discriminating MS, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mobility impairment (SPPB ≤9), and worse MS-related disability (PDDS ≥2). Logistic regression adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates generated refined ROC curves and cut-offs.ResultsBoth PFS subscales demonstrated moderate accuracy (area under the curve 0.59-0.75) for discriminating MS, MCI, and mobility impairment when unadjusted, with accuracy often exceeding 0.80 after covariate adjustment. Among OAMS, mental fatigability more accurately identified MCI, whereas physical fatigability better detected worse MS-related disability. Cut-offs were higher in OAMS than in healthy controls, varying by subscale and clinical outcome. Adjusted analyses revealed nuances in cut-offs, with physical fatigability thresholds consistently higher than mental fatigability.ConclusionPFS subscales can identify MS, cognitive impairment, and mobility impairment in older adults. Cut-offs appear population- and outcome-specific, indicating that thresholds derived from healthy older cohorts may not apply directly to neurological populations. Covariate adjustment refines discriminative accuracy, potentially guiding need for further functional monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251362468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144667807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}