Pub Date : 2023-09-01Epub Date: 2023-08-05DOI: 10.1177/17571774231191337
Chong Yu Wang, Mavis Sh Chan, Jocelyn A Srigley
A pilot quality improvement project was conducted to examine the effect of playing an applause sound effect at a busy hospital concourse for three consecutive days whenever hand hygiene behavior was observed. The immediate effect was documented. The project demonstrated observable interest among people passing by, and hand hygiene events triggered by the sound effect represented 10.1% of all hand hygiene events documented. This supports the possible utility of this intervention in generating public awareness and increasing hand hygiene behavior and demonstrates the feasibility of a longer trial utilizing audio devices.
{"title":"Novel hand hygiene promotion method in a pediatric and maternity hospital: A quality improvement pilot project using auditory feedback.","authors":"Chong Yu Wang, Mavis Sh Chan, Jocelyn A Srigley","doi":"10.1177/17571774231191337","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17571774231191337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A pilot quality improvement project was conducted to examine the effect of playing an applause sound effect at a busy hospital concourse for three consecutive days whenever hand hygiene behavior was observed. The immediate effect was documented. The project demonstrated observable interest among people passing by, and hand hygiene events triggered by the sound effect represented 10.1% of all hand hygiene events documented. This supports the possible utility of this intervention in generating public awareness and increasing hand hygiene behavior and demonstrates the feasibility of a longer trial utilizing audio devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 5","pages":"216-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510658/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41103100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Launch of in-house sensitive cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) mould polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays increased detection of moulds meeting suspected healthcare-associated infection (HAI) criteria. Definition was based on time from admission and mould detection in culture or via molecular methods. We created a modified mould HAI algorithm incorporating clinical context into the case definition, which allowed for better capture of possible mould HAIs, decreased number of investigations, and improved utilization of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) resources.
{"title":"Impact of cell-free DNA fungal polymerase chain reaction panels on healthcare-associated infection mould investigations.","authors":"Ayelet Rosenthal, Alison Prati, Lauren E Kushner, Amy Valencia, Roshni Mathew","doi":"10.1177/17571774231197603","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17571774231197603","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Launch of in-house sensitive cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) mould polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays increased detection of moulds meeting suspected healthcare-associated infection (HAI) criteria. Definition was based on time from admission and mould detection in culture or via molecular methods. We created a modified mould HAI algorithm incorporating clinical context into the case definition, which allowed for better capture of possible mould HAIs, decreased number of investigations, and improved utilization of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 5","pages":"223-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510659/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41141439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01Epub Date: 2023-02-23DOI: 10.1177/17571774231159390
Abisola M Oladimeji, Abayomi Joseph Afe, Tolulope Olumuyiwa, Charlene Offiong, Bakbergen Turibekov, Oluwayemisi Aikulola, Courtney Persse, Jahana Deadmon, Kristine Hansen, Christine Barron, Vijisha Vijayan, Wanda Mora, Jacob Farris, Krysta Dean, Thomas Johnson, Juan Gonzalez, Rahmatu Mansaray, Kirstin Short
Background: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) including assisted living facilities (ALFs) are hubs for high transmission and poor prognosis of COVID-19 among the residents who are more susceptible due to old age and comorbidities.
Aim: Houston Health Department conducted assessments of ALFs within the City of Houston to determine preparedness and existing preventive measures at the facilities.
Methods: Onsite assessments were conducted at ALFs using a modified CDC Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) Tool. Data was obtained on IPC measures, training, testing, vaccination etc. Data was analyzed, frequencies generated, and bivariate associations determined.
Results: A total of 118 facilities were assessed and categorized into small scale 46 (39%), medium scale 47 (40%), and large scale 25 (21%). The facilities had 2431 residents and 2290 staff. Thirty-one (26%) facilities reported an outbreak in 2020, while 14 (12%) had an ongoing outbreak. Twenty-three (97%) large-scale and 12 (26%) small-scale facilities had COVID-19 testing program. Vaccination coverage among residents ranged from 99% in large-scale to 40% in small-scale facilities but was smaller among staff at 748 (45%) in large scale, 71 (36%) in small scale, and 193 (45%) in medium scale. While 24 (96%) large-scale and 34 (77%) of small-scale facilities conducted staff training staff on IPC practices, 22 (92%) of large-scale and 19 (56%) of small-scale facility staff demonstrated capacity (p = 0.01), respectively. Visitor screening was done at 100% of large-scale and 80% of small-scale and the medium-scale ALFs.
Discussion: Assisted living facilities within the city of Houston are at various levels of preparedness and interventions with respect to COVID-19 response.
{"title":"Preparedness and response of assisted living facilities toward COVID-19 infection control in Houston, Texas, USA.","authors":"Abisola M Oladimeji, Abayomi Joseph Afe, Tolulope Olumuyiwa, Charlene Offiong, Bakbergen Turibekov, Oluwayemisi Aikulola, Courtney Persse, Jahana Deadmon, Kristine Hansen, Christine Barron, Vijisha Vijayan, Wanda Mora, Jacob Farris, Krysta Dean, Thomas Johnson, Juan Gonzalez, Rahmatu Mansaray, Kirstin Short","doi":"10.1177/17571774231159390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774231159390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) including assisted living facilities (ALFs) are hubs for high transmission and poor prognosis of COVID-19 among the residents who are more susceptible due to old age and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Houston Health Department conducted assessments of ALFs within the City of Houston to determine preparedness and existing preventive measures at the facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Onsite assessments were conducted at ALFs using a modified CDC Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) Tool. Data was obtained on IPC measures, training, testing, vaccination etc. Data was analyzed, frequencies generated, and bivariate associations determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 118 facilities were assessed and categorized into small scale 46 (39%), medium scale 47 (40%), and large scale 25 (21%). The facilities had 2431 residents and 2290 staff. Thirty-one (26%) facilities reported an outbreak in 2020, while 14 (12%) had an ongoing outbreak. Twenty-three (97%) large-scale and 12 (26%) small-scale facilities had COVID-19 testing program. Vaccination coverage among residents ranged from 99% in large-scale to 40% in small-scale facilities but was smaller among staff at 748 (45%) in large scale, 71 (36%) in small scale, and 193 (45%) in medium scale. While 24 (96%) large-scale and 34 (77%) of small-scale facilities conducted staff training staff on IPC practices, 22 (92%) of large-scale and 19 (56%) of small-scale facility staff demonstrated capacity (<i>p</i> = 0.01), respectively. Visitor screening was done at 100% of large-scale and 80% of small-scale and the medium-scale ALFs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Assisted living facilities within the city of Houston are at various levels of preparedness and interventions with respect to COVID-19 response.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 5","pages":"199-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968688/pdf/10.1177_17571774231159390.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41128038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01Epub Date: 2023-03-21DOI: 10.1177/17571774231165407
Bala Abubakar, Attila Sárváry
Introduction: Antibiotic resistance is a public health concern in Nigeria and the world, and healthcare workers contributed to the upsurge of antibiotic resistance in hospital settings. This study focused on the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of antibiotic use and the frequency of prescriptions of antibiotics from the list of WHO Model Essentials Antibiotics (AWaRe) (in the last 6 months) among healthcare workers and established the determining factors in six hospitals in Niger state, Nigeria.
Methodology: A KAP survey was conducted in Niger State, Nigeria, from March to June 2022. A structured self-administered, pretested questionnaire was distributed to six hospitals in the state following a stratified random sampling considering the staff capacity, the population of the city, and patients' patronage.
Results: A total of 350 questionnaires distributed, and 313 (89.4%) completed and returned from the six hospitals. The median scores were knowledge (75%), attitude (69%), practice (62%), and self-reported prescription (70%), and respondents with good scores were knowledge [195 (62.3%)], attitude [185 (59.1%)], practice [201 (64.2%)], and prescription [117 (37.4%)]. In multivariate analysis, older respondents are more likely to have a good prescription (p = 0.006), and prior antimicrobial training improved their knowledge (p < 0.001), attitude (p = 0.007), and prescription pattern (p = 0.009). All the study participants had prescribed one or more of the most prescribed antibiotics; Amoxicillin clavulanate (Access group, 96.5%), Amoxicillin (Access group, 95.9%), and Metronidazole (Access group, 95.7%).
Conclusions: The study suggests that antibiotic education for healthcare workers and antimicrobial stewardship programs are significant interventions to mitigate antibiotic overuse in the state.
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice on antibiotics use among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study in Niger state, Nigeria.","authors":"Bala Abubakar, Attila Sárváry","doi":"10.1177/17571774231165407","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17571774231165407","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antibiotic resistance is a public health concern in Nigeria and the world, and healthcare workers contributed to the upsurge of antibiotic resistance in hospital settings. This study focused on the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of antibiotic use and the frequency of prescriptions of antibiotics from the list of WHO Model Essentials Antibiotics (AWaRe<b>)</b> (in the last 6 months) among healthcare workers and established the determining factors in six hospitals in Niger state, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A KAP survey was conducted in Niger State, Nigeria, from March to June 2022. A structured self-administered, pretested questionnaire was distributed to six hospitals in the state following a stratified random sampling considering the staff capacity, the population of the city, and patients' patronage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 questionnaires distributed, and 313 (89.4%) completed and returned from the six hospitals. The median scores were knowledge (75%), attitude (69%), practice (62%), and self-reported prescription (70%), and respondents with good scores were knowledge [195 (62.3%)], attitude [185 (59.1%)], practice [201 (64.2%)], and prescription [117 (37.4%)]. In multivariate analysis, older respondents are more likely to have a good prescription (<i>p</i> = 0.006), and prior antimicrobial training improved their knowledge (<i>p</i> < 0.001), attitude (<i>p</i> = 0.007), and prescription pattern (<i>p</i> = 0.009). All the study participants had prescribed one or more of the most prescribed antibiotics; Amoxicillin clavulanate (Access group, 96.5%), Amoxicillin (Access group, 95.9%), and Metronidazole (Access group, 95.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests that antibiotic education for healthcare workers and antimicrobial stewardship programs are significant interventions to mitigate antibiotic overuse in the state.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 5","pages":"206-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41125102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are central venous catheters inserted peripherally but terminate in great vessels. PICCs are widely used for patients requiring long-term intravenous therapy in both in-patient and out-patient settings.
Aim: This study was carried out to understand PICC-related complications, specifically infections and causal pathogens, in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala, South India.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of PICC insertions and follow-up during a 9 years period to look at patient demographics and infections related to PICC was carried out.
Results: The overall PICC-related complication rate is 28.1% (4.98 per 1000 PICC days). Commonest complication was thrombosis followed by infection, either PICC-associated bloodstream infection (PABSI) or local infection (LI). PABSI noted in this study was 1.34 per 1000 catheter days. The majority (85%) of PABSI were due to Gram-negative rods. The average duration of PICC days for occurrence of PABSI was 14 days and the majority occurred in in-patients.
Conclusion: Thrombosis and infection were the commonest PICC-related complications. PABSI rate was comparable to that of previous studies.
{"title":"Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters-associated blood stream infections-occurrence, risk factors, and pathogens, a single center study.","authors":"Rajalakshmi Arjun, Vettakkara Kandy Muhammed Niyas, Aswathy Sasidharan, Jeffery Jomes, Manish Kumar Yadav, Suresh Kesavan","doi":"10.1177/17571774231165404","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17571774231165404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are central venous catheters inserted peripherally but terminate in great vessels. PICCs are widely used for patients requiring long-term intravenous therapy in both in-patient and out-patient settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was carried out to understand PICC-related complications, specifically infections and causal pathogens, in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala, South India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of PICC insertions and follow-up during a 9 years period to look at patient demographics and infections related to PICC was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall PICC-related complication rate is 28.1% (4.98 per 1000 PICC days). Commonest complication was thrombosis followed by infection, either PICC-associated bloodstream infection (PABSI) or local infection (LI). PABSI noted in this study was 1.34 per 1000 catheter days. The majority (85%) of PABSI were due to Gram-negative rods. The average duration of PICC days for occurrence of PABSI was 14 days and the majority occurred in in-patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thrombosis and infection were the commonest PICC-related complications. PABSI rate was comparable to that of previous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 4","pages":"187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273803/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10291235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01Epub Date: 2023-03-21DOI: 10.1177/17571774231165410
Esther Calbo, Sergi Hernández, Nieves Sopena, Laia Castellá, Joaquín Lopez-Contreras, Jordi Cuquet, Maria López-Sánchez, Rafel Pérez, Carlota Gudiol, Ana Coloma, Mariló Marimón, Joan Espinach, Marta Andres, Purificación Martos, Gonçalo Carvalho Rodrigues, Enric Limón
Background: Cancer has been associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in CDI patients. However, data on delayed mortality in cancer patients with CDI are scarce.
Aim/objective: The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes between oncological patients and the general population with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) after 90 days of follow-up.
Methods: A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted in 28 hospitals participating in the VINCat program. Cases were all consecutive adult patients who met the case definition of CDI. Sociodemographic, clinical, and epidemiological variables and evolution at discharge and after 90 days were recorded for each case.
Findings/results: The mortality rate was higher in oncological patients (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.08-2.67). In addition, oncological patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) presented higher recurrence rates (18.5% vs 9.8%, p = 0.049). Among oncological patients treated with metronidazole, those with active CT showed a higher rate of recurrence (35.3% vs 8.0% p = 0.04).
Discussion: Oncological patients presented a higher risk of poor outcomes after CDI. Their early and late mortality rates were higher than in the general population, and in parallel, those undergoing chemotherapy (especially those receiving metronidazole) had higher rates of recurrence.
背景:癌症与 CDI 患者院内死亡风险增加有关。然而,有关癌症病人感染艰难梭菌后的延迟死亡率的数据却很少:本研究的目的是比较肿瘤患者和普通难辨梭状芽孢杆菌感染(CDI)患者在 90 天随访后的结果:在参与 VINCat 计划的 28 家医院开展了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。病例均为符合 CDI 病例定义的连续成年患者。研究记录了每个病例的社会人口学、临床和流行病学变量以及出院时和出院 90 天后的演变情况:肿瘤患者的死亡率较高(OR = 1.70,95% CI:1.08-2.67)。此外,接受化疗(CT)的肿瘤患者复发率更高(18.5% vs 9.8%,P = 0.049)。在接受甲硝唑治疗的肿瘤患者中,CT活跃的患者复发率更高(35.3% vs 8.0% p = 0.04):讨论:肿瘤患者在感染 CDI 后出现不良预后的风险较高。讨论:肿瘤患者在感染 CDI 后出现不良预后的风险较高,其早期和晚期死亡率均高于普通人群,同时,接受化疗者(尤其是接受甲硝唑治疗者)的复发率较高。
{"title":"Late poor outcomes of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infections in oncological patients: A multicentre cohort study.","authors":"Esther Calbo, Sergi Hernández, Nieves Sopena, Laia Castellá, Joaquín Lopez-Contreras, Jordi Cuquet, Maria López-Sánchez, Rafel Pérez, Carlota Gudiol, Ana Coloma, Mariló Marimón, Joan Espinach, Marta Andres, Purificación Martos, Gonçalo Carvalho Rodrigues, Enric Limón","doi":"10.1177/17571774231165410","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17571774231165410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer has been associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in CDI patients. However, data on delayed mortality in cancer patients with CDI are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim/objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes between oncological patients and the general population with <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) after 90 days of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted in 28 hospitals participating in the VINCat program. Cases were all consecutive adult patients who met the case definition of CDI. Sociodemographic, clinical, and epidemiological variables and evolution at discharge and after 90 days were recorded for each case.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>The mortality rate was higher in oncological patients (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.08-2.67). In addition, oncological patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) presented higher recurrence rates (18.5% vs 9.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.049). Among oncological patients treated with metronidazole, those with active CT showed a higher rate of recurrence (35.3% vs 8.0% <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Oncological patients presented a higher risk of poor outcomes after CDI. Their early and late mortality rates were higher than in the general population, and in parallel, those undergoing chemotherapy (especially those receiving metronidazole) had higher rates of recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 4","pages":"182-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273802/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01Epub Date: 2023-03-10DOI: 10.1177/17571774231161821
Santenna Chenchula, Balakrishnan Sadasivam, Ajay Shukla, Saman Pathan, Saurabh Saigal
Background: The present study was conducted to study the prevalence of HAIs in a newly established MICU, common microorganisms causing HAIs and their antibiotic-sensitivity profile, and antimicrobial utilization and mortality rate.
Methods: The present retrospective cohort study was carried out at AIIMS, Bhopal (2015-2019). The prevalence of HAIs was determined; sites of HAIs and common causative microorganisms were identified, and their antibiotic-sensitivity profiles were studied. The group of patients with HAIs was matched with a control group drawn from the pool of patients without HAIs; this matching was done with respect to age, gender, and clinical diagnosis. Antimicrobial utilization, Period of ICU stay, comorbidities and patient mortality rates in the two groups were analyzed. The clinical criteria by the CDC- National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance to diagnose HAIs.
Results: A total of 281 ICU patients' records were analyzed. The mean age was 47.21 ± 19.07 years. Of these 89 were found to have developed ICU-acquired HAIs (Prevalance:32%). Bloodstream infections (33%) and respiratory tract infections (30.68%), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (25.56%), and surgical site infections (6.76%) were the commonest. The most frequently isolated microorganism causing HAIs was K. pneumonia (18%), A. baumannii (14%) and E. coli (12%), 31% isolates of which were multidrug resistant. The average length of ICU stay was high in patients with HAIs (13.85 vs 8.2 days). The most common co-morbidity was type 2 diabetes mellitus (42.86%). Prolonged ICU stays [OR 1.13, (95% CI; 0.04-0.10)] and the presence of HAIs [OR 1.18(95%CI; (0.03-0.15)] were associated with an increased risk of mortality.
Conclusions: An increased prevalence of HAIs essentially bloodstream infections and respiratory infections with MDR organisms to antimicrobials in the watch group is highly considerable. Acquisition of HAIs with MDR organisms and increased length of hospital stay are considerable risk factors for increased mortality in ICU-admitted patients. Regular antimicrobial stewardship activities and revising existing hospital infection control policies accordingly may reduce HAIs.
{"title":"Health care associated infections, antimicrobial resistance and outcomes in patients admitted to intensive care unit, India: A five-Year retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Santenna Chenchula, Balakrishnan Sadasivam, Ajay Shukla, Saman Pathan, Saurabh Saigal","doi":"10.1177/17571774231161821","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17571774231161821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study was conducted to study the prevalence of HAIs in a newly established MICU, common microorganisms causing HAIs and their antibiotic-sensitivity profile, and antimicrobial utilization and mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present retrospective cohort study was carried out at AIIMS, Bhopal (2015-2019). The prevalence of HAIs was determined; sites of HAIs and common causative microorganisms were identified, and their antibiotic-sensitivity profiles were studied. The group of patients with HAIs was matched with a control group drawn from the pool of patients without HAIs; this matching was done with respect to age, gender, and clinical diagnosis. Antimicrobial utilization, Period of ICU stay, comorbidities and patient mortality rates in the two groups were analyzed. The clinical criteria by the CDC- National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance to diagnose HAIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 281 ICU patients' records were analyzed. The mean age was 47.21 ± 19.07 years. Of these 89 were found to have developed ICU-acquired HAIs (Prevalance:32%). Bloodstream infections (33%) and respiratory tract infections (30.68%), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (25.56%), and surgical site infections (6.76%) were the commonest. The most frequently isolated microorganism causing HAIs was K. pneumonia (18%), A. baumannii (14%) and <i>E. coli</i> (12%), 31% isolates of which were multidrug resistant. The average length of ICU stay was high in patients with HAIs (13.85 vs 8.2 days). The most common co-morbidity was type 2 diabetes mellitus (42.86%). Prolonged ICU stays [OR 1.13, (95% CI; 0.04-0.10)] and the presence of HAIs [OR 1.18(95%CI; (0.03-0.15)] were associated with an increased risk of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An increased prevalence of HAIs essentially bloodstream infections and respiratory infections with MDR organisms to antimicrobials in the watch group is highly considerable. Acquisition of HAIs with MDR organisms and increased length of hospital stay are considerable risk factors for increased mortality in ICU-admitted patients. Regular antimicrobial stewardship activities and revising existing hospital infection control policies accordingly may reduce HAIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 4","pages":"159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1177/17571774231159383
Tess F Asgill, Douglas Stupart
Background: A number of infection control interventions were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to reduce the spread of this virus.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if these interventions were associated with reduced nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria, Australia.
Methods: Observational data were obtained from the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) based on admitted hospital patients in two 6-month timeframes representing pandemic and pre-pandemic hospital practices. Data were collected for surgical site infections, Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and central line-associated bloodstream infections.
Results: There was a significant reduction in the rates of S. aureus bacteraemia (0.74 infections/10, 000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.53/10,000 bed days in the pandemic period [rate ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90]; p = .003) and in C. difficile infections (2.2 infections/10,000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.86/10 000 bed days in the pandemic era [rate ratio 0.76, 95% C.I. 0.67-0.86]; p <.001). There was no change in the overall rate of surgical site infections or central line-associated infections however.
Discussion: The increased emphasis on infection control and prevention strategies during the pandemic period was associated with reduced transmission of S. aureus and C. difficile infections within hospitals.
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间实施了一些感染控制干预措施,以减少该病毒的传播。目的:本研究的目的是确定这些干预措施是否与减少澳大利亚维多利亚州的医院细菌感染有关。方法:观察性数据来自维多利亚卫生保健相关感染监测系统(VICNISS),基于代表大流行和大流行前医院实践的两个6个月时间框架的住院患者。收集手术部位感染、金黄色葡萄球菌血症、艰难梭菌感染和中央静脉相关血流感染的数据。结果:金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症发生率显著降低(大流行前0.74例感染/1万床日,大流行期0.53例/1万床日)[比率比0.72,95% CI 0.57-0.90];p = 0.003)和艰难梭菌感染(大流行前2.2例感染/10,000床日,大流行时期0.86例感染/10,000床日[比率比0.76,95% C.I. 0.67-0.86];p讨论:大流行期间对感染控制和预防策略的日益重视与金黄色葡萄球菌和艰难梭菌感染在医院内的传播减少有关。
{"title":"Nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Tess F Asgill, Douglas Stupart","doi":"10.1177/17571774231159383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774231159383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of infection control interventions were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to reduce the spread of this virus.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if these interventions were associated with reduced nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational data were obtained from the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) based on admitted hospital patients in two 6-month timeframes representing pandemic and pre-pandemic hospital practices. Data were collected for surgical site infections, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia, <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection, and central line-associated bloodstream infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant reduction in the rates of <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia (0.74 infections/10, 000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.53/10,000 bed days in the pandemic period [rate ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90]; <i>p</i> = .003) and in <i>C. difficile</i> infections (2.2 infections/10,000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.86/10 000 bed days in the pandemic era [rate ratio 0.76, 95% C.I. 0.67-0.86]; <i>p</i> <.001). There was no change in the overall rate of surgical site infections or central line-associated infections however.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The increased emphasis on infection control and prevention strategies during the pandemic period was associated with reduced transmission of <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>C. difficile</i> infections within hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 4","pages":"151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974379/pdf/10.1177_17571774231159383.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10018942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01Epub Date: 2023-03-19DOI: 10.1177/17571774231159388
Marisol Resendiz, Dawn Blanchard, Gordon F West
Background: There is not yet a consensus regarding the in-use effectiveness of ultraviolet irradiation (UV-C) as a supplementary tool for terminal room disinfection.
Aims and objectives: To summarize and evaluate literature detailing the germicidal effectiveness of UV-C disinfection on high-touch surfaces in the patient environment.
Methods: A literature search was carried out utilizing PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if intervention included UV-C after standard room disinfection in hospital rooms evaluated microbiologically by surface type.
Findings/results: Twelve records met our criteria for inclusion. Studies predominantly focused on terminal disinfection of patient rooms, including five reports carried out in isolation rooms and three studies including operating room (OR) surfaces. Bedrails, remote controls, phones, tray tables, assist rails, floors, and toilets were the most commonly reported surfaces. Across study designs, surfaces, and room types, flat surfaces tended to showcase UV-C effectiveness best, particularly isolation room floors. In contrast, handheld surfaces (i.e., bed controls and assist bars) tended to show reduced efficacies (81-93%). In the OR, complex surfaces similarly demonstrated reduced UV-C effectiveness. Bathroom surfaces demonstrated 83% UV-C effectiveness overall, with surface characteristics uniquely impacted depending on the room type. Isolation room studies tended to include effectiveness comparison with standard treatment, reporting UV-C superiority most of the time.
Discussion: This review highlights the enhanced effectiveness of UV-C surface disinfection over standard protocols across various study designs and surfaces. However, surface and room characteristics do appear to play a role in the level of bacterial reduction.
{"title":"A systematic review of the germicidal effectiveness of ultraviolet disinfection across high-touch surfaces in the immediate patient environment.","authors":"Marisol Resendiz, Dawn Blanchard, Gordon F West","doi":"10.1177/17571774231159388","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17571774231159388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is not yet a consensus regarding the in-use effectiveness of ultraviolet irradiation (UV-C) as a supplementary tool for terminal room disinfection.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To summarize and evaluate literature detailing the germicidal effectiveness of UV-C disinfection on high-touch surfaces in the patient environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was carried out utilizing PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if intervention included UV-C after standard room disinfection in hospital rooms evaluated microbiologically by surface type.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>Twelve records met our criteria for inclusion. Studies predominantly focused on terminal disinfection of patient rooms, including five reports carried out in isolation rooms and three studies including operating room (OR) surfaces. Bedrails, remote controls, phones, tray tables, assist rails, floors, and toilets were the most commonly reported surfaces. Across study designs, surfaces, and room types, flat surfaces tended to showcase UV-C effectiveness best, particularly isolation room floors. In contrast, handheld surfaces (i.e., bed controls and assist bars) tended to show reduced efficacies (81-93%). In the OR, complex surfaces similarly demonstrated reduced UV-C effectiveness. Bathroom surfaces demonstrated 83% UV-C effectiveness overall, with surface characteristics uniquely impacted depending on the room type. Isolation room studies tended to include effectiveness comparison with standard treatment, reporting UV-C superiority most of the time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review highlights the enhanced effectiveness of UV-C surface disinfection over standard protocols across various study designs and surfaces. However, surface and room characteristics do appear to play a role in the level of bacterial reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 4","pages":"166-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273798/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}