Kathrine B. Faldborg, Jørgen B. Hasselstrøm, Thomas Kraemer, Charlotte U. Andersen, Andrea E. Steuer
Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) has been implicated in drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA). However, due to its rapid elimination and the challenge of distinguishing exogenous from endogenous levels, GHB is likely to be significantly underestimated in DFSA cases. Consequently, previous research has focused on identifying biomarkers associated with GHB intake that persist longer than GHB itself. Conjugates of GHB with amino acids and pentose have been proposed as potential candidates, but data on their detection times remain limited. In this study, a randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving 30 healthy volunteers was conducted. Urine samples were collected at regular intervals over 5 days post-administration. Using a validated LC-MS/MS method, we quantified known and proposed GHB biomarkers, aiming to identify those capable of extending the detection window. GHB–amino acid conjugates showed limited utility beyond early time points, whereas a tentatively identified GHB-pentose emerged as a very promising marker. With structural confirmation and further validation, it may allow reliable detection for at least 24 h after intake, representing a significant advance in DFSA investigations.
{"title":"Prolonged Detection of GHB Intake in Urine: Are We Finally There?","authors":"Kathrine B. Faldborg, Jørgen B. Hasselstrøm, Thomas Kraemer, Charlotte U. Andersen, Andrea E. Steuer","doi":"10.1002/dta.3956","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dta.3956","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) has been implicated in drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA). However, due to its rapid elimination and the challenge of distinguishing exogenous from endogenous levels, GHB is likely to be significantly underestimated in DFSA cases. Consequently, previous research has focused on identifying biomarkers associated with GHB intake that persist longer than GHB itself. Conjugates of GHB with amino acids and pentose have been proposed as potential candidates, but data on their detection times remain limited. In this study, a randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving 30 healthy volunteers was conducted. Urine samples were collected at regular intervals over 5 days post-administration. Using a validated LC-MS/MS method, we quantified known and proposed GHB biomarkers, aiming to identify those capable of extending the detection window. GHB–amino acid conjugates showed limited utility beyond early time points, whereas a tentatively identified GHB-pentose emerged as a very promising marker. With structural confirmation and further validation, it may allow reliable detection for at least 24 h after intake, representing a significant advance in DFSA investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":"17 12","pages":"2429-2446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dta.3956","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kim Petterson Bohlin, Tomas Villén, Oscar Hopcraft, Anton Pohanka, Lena Ekström
It is of interest to investigate trends in AAS usage profile. Here we aimed to retrospectively study the prevalence of AAS-positive samples based on 21,172 consecutive analyses from routine AAS testing 2014–2023. Moreover, 310 urine samples from 2022 to 2023 were reanalyzed for a broader AAS panel as well as for the presence of narcotics. Between 2014 and 2023, the frequency of reported AAS-positive samples varied between 6% and 11%, with no trend discerned. The prevalence of samples containing several AAS also shows a similar distribution. The most common AAS detected were consistently testosterone, nandrolone, and drostanolone. Of the 310 urine samples reanalyzed, 80 male and 6 female samples were positive for AAS. Thirteen of the samples showed T/E 4–10, indicative of testosterone use, with no other AAS. Consequently, 4% of the samples might have been reported as false negatives. Of the AAS-positive samples, amphetamine was found in 10% and 0% of the male and female samples, respectively. Cannabis was more often detected in AAS-positive female samples (50%) than in male samples (25%), whereas cocaine was more commonly detected in male than in female samples (33 versus 17%). The prevalence of cannabis and amphetamine was like previous AAS studies conducted in Sweden, whereas the presence of cocaine in male samples was substantially higher. Co-use of AAS and narcotics is a well-known problem and highlights the importance of preventive actions and education/awareness of AAS.
{"title":"Prevalence of AAS-Positive Samples at Drug Abuse Laboratory Sweden Between 2014 and 2023 and Sub-Study of Dual Use of AAS and Narcotics","authors":"Kim Petterson Bohlin, Tomas Villén, Oscar Hopcraft, Anton Pohanka, Lena Ekström","doi":"10.1002/dta.3955","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dta.3955","url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is of interest to investigate trends in AAS usage profile. Here we aimed to retrospectively study the prevalence of AAS-positive samples based on 21,172 consecutive analyses from routine AAS testing 2014–2023. Moreover, 310 urine samples from 2022 to 2023 were reanalyzed for a broader AAS panel as well as for the presence of narcotics. Between 2014 and 2023, the frequency of reported AAS-positive samples varied between 6% and 11%, with no trend discerned. The prevalence of samples containing several AAS also shows a similar distribution. The most common AAS detected were consistently testosterone, nandrolone, and drostanolone. Of the 310 urine samples reanalyzed, 80 male and 6 female samples were positive for AAS. Thirteen of the samples showed T/E 4–10, indicative of testosterone use, with no other AAS. Consequently, 4% of the samples might have been reported as false negatives. Of the AAS-positive samples, amphetamine was found in 10% and 0% of the male and female samples, respectively. Cannabis was more often detected in AAS-positive female samples (50%) than in male samples (25%), whereas cocaine was more commonly detected in male than in female samples (33 versus 17%). The prevalence of cannabis and amphetamine was like previous AAS studies conducted in Sweden, whereas the presence of cocaine in male samples was substantially higher. Co-use of AAS and narcotics is a well-known problem and highlights the importance of preventive actions and education/awareness of AAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":"17 12","pages":"2421-2428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dta.3955","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145135906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C. Cloteau, V. Delcourt, B. Loup, B. Chabot, M. Pescher, E. Susdorf, Z. Kaabia, P. Garcia, M. A. Popot, B. Le Bizec, G. Dervilly, L. Bailly-Chouriberry