Background: Influenza causes approximately 3-5 million severe cases and 290,000-650,000 deaths annually, and oseltamivir is considered the first-line pharmacotherapy. Recent reports on neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) associated with the use of oseltamivir necessitated a systematic safety profile review.
Objective: To systematically review and meta-synthesize the evidence on the associations of oseltamivir with adverse NPEs and behavioral events.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through October 31, 2024. Studies comparing oseltamivir with other control groups for NPEs were analyzed. Outcomes were categorized into (1) affective disorders, (2) neuropsychiatric symptoms, (3) anxiety disorders, (4) schizophrenic/psychotic disorders, and (5) suicide-related behaviors.
Results: 9 studies with 1,139-3,352,015 patients were identified. Oseltamivir significantly associated with a lower overall NPE incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72-0.97), except in patients younger than 20 years. Subgroup analyses showed significant association with a lower incidence risk in suicide attempts across all ages (RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.77) and in schizophrenia/psychotic disorders for patients younger than 20 years (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.93).
Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive meta-analysis examining the associations of oseltamivir with various NPEs and behavioral adverse events, and we found no evidence supporting increased risks of these adverse events with oseltamivir use.
背景:流感每年造成约300万至500万严重病例和29万至65万人死亡,奥司他韦被认为是一线药物治疗。最近关于与使用奥司他韦相关的神经精神事件(npe)的报道需要进行系统的安全性评估。目的:系统回顾和综合奥司他韦与不良NPEs和行为事件相关的证据。方法:我们使用PubMed/Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,从开始到2024年10月31日,按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。比较奥司他韦与其他对照组治疗npe的研究进行了分析。结果分为(1)情感障碍,(2)神经精神症状,(3)焦虑障碍,(4)精神分裂症/精神障碍,(5)自杀相关行为。结果:9项研究共纳入1139 - 3352015例患者。奥司他韦与较低的总体NPE发生率显著相关(风险比[RR] = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72-0.97),年龄小于20岁的患者除外。亚组分析显示,所有年龄段的自杀企图发生率(RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.77)和20岁以下的精神分裂症/精神障碍患者(RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.93)与较低的发生率风险显著相关。结论:这是第一个全面的荟萃分析,研究了奥司他韦与各种npe和行为不良事件的关联,我们没有发现证据支持使用奥司他韦会增加这些不良事件的风险。
{"title":"Associations of oseltamivir with neuropsychiatric and behavioral adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hye Su Jeong, Yeo Wool Lee, Taeho Greg Rhee, Sung Ryul Shim","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1051","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza causes approximately 3-5 million severe cases and 290,000-650,000 deaths annually, and oseltamivir is considered the first-line pharmacotherapy. Recent reports on neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) associated with the use of oseltamivir necessitated a systematic safety profile review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and meta-synthesize the evidence on the associations of oseltamivir with adverse NPEs and behavioral events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through October 31, 2024. Studies comparing oseltamivir with other control groups for NPEs were analyzed. Outcomes were categorized into (1) affective disorders, (2) neuropsychiatric symptoms, (3) anxiety disorders, (4) schizophrenic/psychotic disorders, and (5) suicide-related behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>9 studies with 1,139-3,352,015 patients were identified. Oseltamivir significantly associated with a lower overall NPE incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72-0.97), except in patients younger than 20 years. Subgroup analyses showed significant association with a lower incidence risk in suicide attempts across all ages (RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.77) and in schizophrenia/psychotic disorders for patients younger than 20 years (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first comprehensive meta-analysis examining the associations of oseltamivir with various NPEs and behavioral adverse events, and we found no evidence supporting increased risks of these adverse events with oseltamivir use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1051-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467762/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-22DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.24302
Kevin M Pantalone, Rakesh Singh, Aozhou Wu, Keith A Betts, Yan Chen, Youssef Mk Farag, Scott Beeman, Yuxian Du, Sheldon X Kong, Todd Williamson, Qixin Li, Brendan Rabideau, Navdeep Tangri
Background: Albuminuria, indicated by an elevated urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) at baseline, is consistently associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased economic burden. The effect of a change in albuminuria over time on health care resource utilization is not well understood.
Objective: To assess the association between changes in UACR and economic outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods: The Optum electronic health records database (January 2007 to September 2021) was used to identify adult patients with albuminuria, measured by UACR of 30 mg/g or more (initial test) after diagnosis of T2D and CKD. UACR change was categorized as increased (>30% change), stable (30% increase to 30% decrease), or decreased (>30% change) based on the percentage of change between the initial test and the follow-up test (the last test within 0.5 to 2 years after the initial test). All-cause inpatient (IP) admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient (OP) visits, and total medical costs were evaluated during the year after the follow-up test. The association of UACR change with health care resource utilization (HRU) was evaluated using Poisson regression, adjusting for key baseline characteristics. Medical costs (2022 US dollars) were estimated using a unit costing approach based on HRU frequencies.
Results: Among 144,814 eligible patients included in the study, 81,084 (56%) had decreased, 31,766 (22%) had stable, and 31,964 (22%) had increased UACR. Patients with increased UACR had higher HRU (IP admissions: 0.24 per-person per-year [PPPY]; ED visits: 0.35 PPPY; OP visits: 21.20 PPPY) and annual medical costs ($15,013 PPPY) than patients with stable UACR (IP: 0.18 PPPY; ED: 0.31 PPPY; OP: 19.13 PPPY; costs: $12,521 PPPY) and decreased UACR (IP: 0.17 PPPY, ED: 0.31 PPPY, OP: 19.90 PPPY; costs: $12,329 PPPY). Compared with patients with increased UACR, those with decreased UACR had adjusted incidence rate ratios of 0.79 (95% CI = 0.76-0.82) for IP, 0.88 (0.85-0.92) for ED, and 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for OP, and patients with stable UACR had adjusted incidence rate ratios of 0.82 (0.78-0.86) for IP, 0.91 (0.87-0.95) for ED, and 0.94 (0.92-0.95) for OP (all P values of <0.001).
Conclusions: Among patients with CKD and T2D who had albuminuria, an increase in UACR over time was associated with significantly higher HRU and costs compared with patients with stable or decreased UACR. Managed care organizations and other health care decision-makers should consider strategies that enhance monitoring and management of UACR in patients with CKD and T2D to potentially reduce HRU and associated costs.
{"title":"Changes in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and health care resource utilization and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.","authors":"Kevin M Pantalone, Rakesh Singh, Aozhou Wu, Keith A Betts, Yan Chen, Youssef Mk Farag, Scott Beeman, Yuxian Du, Sheldon X Kong, Todd Williamson, Qixin Li, Brendan Rabideau, Navdeep Tangri","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24302","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Albuminuria, indicated by an elevated urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) at baseline, is consistently associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased economic burden. The effect of a change in albuminuria over time on health care resource utilization is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between changes in UACR and economic outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Optum electronic health records database (January 2007 to September 2021) was used to identify adult patients with albuminuria, measured by UACR of 30 mg/g or more (initial test) after diagnosis of T2D and CKD. UACR change was categorized as increased (>30% change), stable (30% increase to 30% decrease), or decreased (>30% change) based on the percentage of change between the initial test and the follow-up test (the last test within 0.5 to 2 years after the initial test). All-cause inpatient (IP) admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient (OP) visits, and total medical costs were evaluated during the year after the follow-up test. The association of UACR change with health care resource utilization (HRU) was evaluated using Poisson regression, adjusting for key baseline characteristics. Medical costs (2022 US dollars) were estimated using a unit costing approach based on HRU frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 144,814 eligible patients included in the study, 81,084 (56%) had decreased, 31,766 (22%) had stable, and 31,964 (22%) had increased UACR. Patients with increased UACR had higher HRU (IP admissions: 0.24 per-person per-year [PPPY]; ED visits: 0.35 PPPY; OP visits: 21.20 PPPY) and annual medical costs ($15,013 PPPY) than patients with stable UACR (IP: 0.18 PPPY; ED: 0.31 PPPY; OP: 19.13 PPPY; costs: $12,521 PPPY) and decreased UACR (IP: 0.17 PPPY, ED: 0.31 PPPY, OP: 19.90 PPPY; costs: $12,329 PPPY). Compared with patients with increased UACR, those with decreased UACR had adjusted incidence rate ratios of 0.79 (95% CI = 0.76-0.82) for IP, 0.88 (0.85-0.92) for ED, and 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for OP, and patients with stable UACR had adjusted incidence rate ratios of 0.82 (0.78-0.86) for IP, 0.91 (0.87-0.95) for ED, and 0.94 (0.92-0.95) for OP (all <i>P</i> values of <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with CKD and T2D who had albuminuria, an increase in UACR over time was associated with significantly higher HRU and costs compared with patients with stable or decreased UACR. Managed care organizations and other health care decision-makers should consider strategies that enhance monitoring and management of UACR in patients with CKD and T2D to potentially reduce HRU and associated costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1017-1028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467748/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1029
Jun Wu, Alexandra Perez, Patrick W Sullivan
Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) offer cardiorenal benefits in diabetes management. Since 2020, public awareness of GLP-1 RAs for diabetes, weight loss, and the prevention of cardiovascular disease has led to a surge in their utilization. However, the high cost of GLP-1 RAs and limitations in insurance coverage have been considered significant barriers to access. Current knowledge regarding how GLP-1 RA use affects total health care costs in diabetes care after 2020 in the United States remains limited. Consequently, further research is needed to examine the financial burden of GLP-1 RA use on patients and payers, as well as its overall impact on total health care costs at the national level.
Objective: To examine GLP-1 RA utilization and association with health care costs among US adults with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: Using data from the 2021-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the study sample included individuals (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Outcomes included GLP-1 RA use and all-cause and diabetes-related health care costs, including medical and prescription drug costs paid by patients and insurers. Generalized linear regression with a log link and gamma distribution was used to assess the effect of GLP-1 RA use on health care costs, adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.
Results: Among 3,587 eligible adults with type 2 diabetes, 637 (18.8%) used GLP-1 RAs, representing an estimated 3.66 million US adults-a marked increase compared with pre-2020 estimates of less than 10%. Fewer older adults (aged ≥65 years) used GLP-1 RAs (35.1%) compared with adults aged 45-64 years (50.6%). The average annual per-person cost of GLP-1 RA was $6,947. Although insurance covered more than 95% of GLP-1 RA cost, these medications represented a substantial proportion of diabetes care costs: 63.3% of antidiabetic drug costs and 55.7% of total diabetes-related costs among GLP-1 RA users. After adjustment, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a 219% increase in diabetes-related costs and a 55.3% increase in total all-cause health care costs.
Conclusions: GLP-1 RA utilization among US adults with type 2 diabetes has substantially increased, with use in 2021-2022 nearly double that of the period prior to 2020. The higher health care costs associated with taking GLP-1 RAs were largely attributable to high drug costs, of which over 95% were covered by insurance.
{"title":"Patterns and costs associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use in US adults with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Jun Wu, Alexandra Perez, Patrick W Sullivan","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1029","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) offer cardiorenal benefits in diabetes management. Since 2020, public awareness of GLP-1 RAs for diabetes, weight loss, and the prevention of cardiovascular disease has led to a surge in their utilization. However, the high cost of GLP-1 RAs and limitations in insurance coverage have been considered significant barriers to access. Current knowledge regarding how GLP-1 RA use affects total health care costs in diabetes care after 2020 in the United States remains limited. Consequently, further research is needed to examine the financial burden of GLP-1 RA use on patients and payers, as well as its overall impact on total health care costs at the national level.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine GLP-1 RA utilization and association with health care costs among US adults with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the 2021-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the study sample included individuals (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Outcomes included GLP-1 RA use and all-cause and diabetes-related health care costs, including medical and prescription drug costs paid by patients and insurers. Generalized linear regression with a log link and gamma distribution was used to assess the effect of GLP-1 RA use on health care costs, adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,587 eligible adults with type 2 diabetes, 637 (18.8%) used GLP-1 RAs, representing an estimated 3.66 million US adults-a marked increase compared with pre-2020 estimates of less than 10%. Fewer older adults (aged ≥65 years) used GLP-1 RAs (35.1%) compared with adults aged 45-64 years (50.6%). The average annual per-person cost of GLP-1 RA was $6,947. Although insurance covered more than 95% of GLP-1 RA cost, these medications represented a substantial proportion of diabetes care costs: 63.3% of antidiabetic drug costs and 55.7% of total diabetes-related costs among GLP-1 RA users. After adjustment, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a 219% increase in diabetes-related costs and a 55.3% increase in total all-cause health care costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1 RA utilization among US adults with type 2 diabetes has substantially increased, with use in 2021-2022 nearly double that of the period prior to 2020. The higher health care costs associated with taking GLP-1 RAs were largely attributable to high drug costs, of which over 95% were covered by insurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1029-1038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467763/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006
Pragya Rai, Andrew Song, Su Zhang, Yan Song, Chi Gao, Anya Jiang, Jiayang Li, Peixi Jiang, James Signorovitch, Ashwini Arunachalam, Ayman Samkari, Megan E Daly
Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the recommended treatment for inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although prior research has assessed overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates post-SBRT, limited data exist on the clinical and economic impact of recurrence and the association between event-free survival (EFS) and OS in this patient population.
Objective: To compare OS, health care resource utilization (HRU), and costs between patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving primary SBRT, with and without recurrence, and assess the association between real-world EFS (rwEFS) and OS.
Methods: The SEER-Medicare database (2007-2020) was used to identify patients with stage I-IIB (N0) NSCLC receiving primary SBRT. Patients were categorized into recurrence and nonrecurrence cohorts based on disease recurrence status post-SBRT. OS, all-cause and NSCLC-related HRU, and health care costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence. The correlation between OS and rwEFS was assessed using the normal scores rank correlation and landmark analyses.
Results: A total of 3,014 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,455 (48.3%) experiencing disease recurrence. Median OS was significantly shorter for the recurrence cohort (18.9 months) compared with the nonrecurrence cohort (51.4 months; log-rank P < 0.001). Patients with recurrence had a 2.16-fold higher risk of death (95% CI = 1.94-2.42; P < 0.001). HRU and health care costs were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort, with adjusted monthly all-cause and NSCLC-related costs per patient exceeding those of nonrecurrence patients by $5,458 and $3,838, respectively (both P < 0.001). A significant correlation was observed between rwEFS and OS (ρ = 0.74; P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Recurrence after SBRT in unresected, early-stage NSCLC was associated with worse survival and substantial economic burden. The strong correlation between rwEFS and OS suggests that EFS may serve as a good predictor for OS and be a clinically relevant trial endpoint. These findings highlight the need for novel strategies to prevent/delay recurrence.
背景:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)是不能手术的早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的推荐治疗方法。尽管先前的研究已经评估了sbrt后的总生存期(OS)和复发率,但在该患者群体中,关于复发的临床和经济影响以及无事件生存期(EFS)和OS之间关系的数据有限。目的:比较接受原发性SBRT的早期非小细胞肺癌患者的生存期、医疗资源利用率(HRU)和成本,并评估真实世界EFS (rwEFS)与生存期之间的关系。方法:使用SEER-Medicare数据库(2007-2020)来识别接受原发性SBRT治疗的I-IIB期(N0) NSCLC患者。根据sbrt后的疾病复发情况,将患者分为复发组和非复发组。比较复发和无复发患者的OS、全因和非小细胞肺癌相关HRU和医疗费用。OS与rwEFS的相关性采用正态评分、秩相关和里程碑分析进行评估。结果:共有3014例患者符合纳入标准,其中1455例(48.3%)出现疾病复发。复发组的中位生存期(18.9个月)明显短于非复发组(51.4个月);log-rank P P P P结论:未切除的早期非小细胞肺癌SBRT后复发与较差的生存率和沉重的经济负担相关。rwEFS和OS之间的强相关性表明,EFS可以作为OS的良好预测因子,并且是临床相关的试验终点。这些发现强调需要新的策略来预防/延迟复发。
{"title":"Clinical and economic impact of recurrence in unresected non-small cell lung cancer treated with primary stereotactic body radiotherapy: A real-world study using SEER-Medicare data.","authors":"Pragya Rai, Andrew Song, Su Zhang, Yan Song, Chi Gao, Anya Jiang, Jiayang Li, Peixi Jiang, James Signorovitch, Ashwini Arunachalam, Ayman Samkari, Megan E Daly","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the recommended treatment for inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although prior research has assessed overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates post-SBRT, limited data exist on the clinical and economic impact of recurrence and the association between event-free survival (EFS) and OS in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare OS, health care resource utilization (HRU), and costs between patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving primary SBRT, with and without recurrence, and assess the association between real-world EFS (rwEFS) and OS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SEER-Medicare database (2007-2020) was used to identify patients with stage I-IIB (N0) NSCLC receiving primary SBRT. Patients were categorized into recurrence and nonrecurrence cohorts based on disease recurrence status post-SBRT. OS, all-cause and NSCLC-related HRU, and health care costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence. The correlation between OS and rwEFS was assessed using the normal scores rank correlation and landmark analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,014 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,455 (48.3%) experiencing disease recurrence. Median OS was significantly shorter for the recurrence cohort (18.9 months) compared with the nonrecurrence cohort (51.4 months; log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients with recurrence had a 2.16-fold higher risk of death (95% CI = 1.94-2.42; <i>P</i> < 0.001). HRU and health care costs were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort, with adjusted monthly all-cause and NSCLC-related costs per patient exceeding those of nonrecurrence patients by $5,458 and $3,838, respectively (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). A significant correlation was observed between rwEFS and OS (ρ = 0.74; <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recurrence after SBRT in unresected, early-stage NSCLC was associated with worse survival and substantial economic burden. The strong correlation between rwEFS and OS suggests that EFS may serve as a good predictor for OS and be a clinically relevant trial endpoint. These findings highlight the need for novel strategies to prevent/delay recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1006-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467756/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1075
Samuel C Ofili, Paroma Arefin, Olajumoke A Olateju, Sujit S Sansgiry
<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 65 million Americans suffer from arthritis, which is the primary cause of disability in older adults. Arthritis is also a leading disease, with more than $600 billion in medical expenses each year. There is, however, little research on health care expenditure by race and ethnicity among older adults with arthritis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the racial and ethnic differences in health care expenditures among older adults with arthritis in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multiyear cross-sectional study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data (2018-2022) analyzed health care expenditures of adults aged 65 years and older with arthritis across different races and ethnicities. All-cause expenditures (total, office-based visits, hospital inpatient visits, prescription medicine, and outpatient visits) were compared between Hispanic patients, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients, and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, adjusting for covariates using SAS version 9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 15,345 adults (weighted frequency = 29,915,198) with arthritis. The mean total annual health care expenditure was $15,052 (95% CI = $14,435-$15,667) for all adults with arthritis. Although Hispanic patients had the lowest total expenditure ($14,159, 95% CI = $11,955-$16,363), NHB and NHW patients had similar total annual health care expenditures at $15,623 (95% CI = $12,228-$19,015) and $15,237 (95% CI = $14,599-$15,876), respectively. After adjustment for covariates, Hispanic and NHB patients spent 34% (95% CI = 24%-43%) and 31% (95% CI = 22%-39%) less than NHW patients (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). This was largely because of lower office-based expenditures, where both Hispanic and NHB patients spent approximately 52% (95% CI = 42%-60%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) less than NHW patients. Also, Hispanic patients incurred 23% (95% CI = 1%-41%) lower hospital inpatient expenditure (<i>P</i> = 0.0406) than NHW patients. For outpatient visits, Hispanic patients spent 71% (95% CI = 59%-80%) and NHB patients 50% (95% CI = 34%-62%) (both <i>P</i> < 0.0001) lower than NHW patients. Hispanic and NHB patients differed only in outpatient expenditures, where NHB patients significantly spent 75% more than Hispanic patients (95% CI = 16%-162%, <i>P</i> = 0.007) after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Total health care expenditures were substantially lower for Hispanic and NHB patients with arthritis compared with NHW patients after adjusting for various covariates. Specifically, Hispanics and NHB patients had lower office-based and outpatient expenditures. Additionally, Hispanic patients incurred lower hospital inpatient expenditures than NHW patients. There is a need for further studies delving into finding reasons for these differences in expenditures, such as behavioral and belief systems that may limit the use of care among racial a
背景:超过6500万美国人患有关节炎,这是导致老年人残疾的主要原因。关节炎也是一种主要疾病,每年的医疗费用超过6000亿美元。然而,对患有关节炎的老年人按种族和民族划分的医疗保健支出的研究很少。目的:研究美国老年关节炎患者在医疗保健支出方面的种族差异。方法:使用医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)数据(2018-2022)进行回顾性多年横断面研究,分析不同种族和民族65岁及以上关节炎患者的医疗保健支出。使用SAS 9.4版对协变量进行调整,比较西班牙裔患者、非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)患者和非西班牙裔白人(NHW)患者的全因支出(总、基于办公室的就诊、住院就诊、处方药和门诊就诊)。结果:该研究分析了15,345名患有关节炎的成年人(加权频率= 29,915,198)。所有患有关节炎的成年人的平均年度医疗保健支出总额为15,052美元(95% CI = 14,435- 15,667美元)。虽然西班牙裔患者的总支出最低(14,159美元,95% CI = 11,955- 16,363美元),但NHB和NHW患者的年度医疗保健总支出相似,分别为15,623美元(95% CI = 12,228- 19,015美元)和15,237美元(95% CI = 14,599- 15,876美元)。调整协变量后,西班牙裔和NHB患者比NHW患者花费分别少34% (95% CI = 24%-43%)和31% (95% CI = 22%-39%) (P P P = 0.0406)。在门诊就诊方面,调整协变量后,西班牙裔患者花费71% (95% CI = 59%-80%), NHB患者花费50% (95% CI = 34%-62%)(均P P = 0.007)。结论:在调整各种协变量后,西班牙裔和非西班牙裔美国人关节炎患者的医疗保健总支出明显低于非西班牙裔美国人关节炎患者。具体来说,西班牙裔和NHB患者的门诊和门诊费用较低。此外,西班牙裔患者的住院费用低于非西班牙裔患者。有必要进行进一步的研究,深入寻找这些支出差异的原因,例如行为和信仰体系,这些因素可能会限制少数种族和族裔群体对护理的使用。
{"title":"Examining racial and ethnic differences in health care expenditures among older adults with arthritis in the United States.","authors":"Samuel C Ofili, Paroma Arefin, Olajumoke A Olateju, Sujit S Sansgiry","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1075","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 65 million Americans suffer from arthritis, which is the primary cause of disability in older adults. Arthritis is also a leading disease, with more than $600 billion in medical expenses each year. There is, however, little research on health care expenditure by race and ethnicity among older adults with arthritis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the racial and ethnic differences in health care expenditures among older adults with arthritis in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multiyear cross-sectional study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data (2018-2022) analyzed health care expenditures of adults aged 65 years and older with arthritis across different races and ethnicities. All-cause expenditures (total, office-based visits, hospital inpatient visits, prescription medicine, and outpatient visits) were compared between Hispanic patients, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients, and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, adjusting for covariates using SAS version 9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 15,345 adults (weighted frequency = 29,915,198) with arthritis. The mean total annual health care expenditure was $15,052 (95% CI = $14,435-$15,667) for all adults with arthritis. Although Hispanic patients had the lowest total expenditure ($14,159, 95% CI = $11,955-$16,363), NHB and NHW patients had similar total annual health care expenditures at $15,623 (95% CI = $12,228-$19,015) and $15,237 (95% CI = $14,599-$15,876), respectively. After adjustment for covariates, Hispanic and NHB patients spent 34% (95% CI = 24%-43%) and 31% (95% CI = 22%-39%) less than NHW patients (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). This was largely because of lower office-based expenditures, where both Hispanic and NHB patients spent approximately 52% (95% CI = 42%-60%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) less than NHW patients. Also, Hispanic patients incurred 23% (95% CI = 1%-41%) lower hospital inpatient expenditure (<i>P</i> = 0.0406) than NHW patients. For outpatient visits, Hispanic patients spent 71% (95% CI = 59%-80%) and NHB patients 50% (95% CI = 34%-62%) (both <i>P</i> < 0.0001) lower than NHW patients. Hispanic and NHB patients differed only in outpatient expenditures, where NHB patients significantly spent 75% more than Hispanic patients (95% CI = 16%-162%, <i>P</i> = 0.007) after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Total health care expenditures were substantially lower for Hispanic and NHB patients with arthritis compared with NHW patients after adjusting for various covariates. Specifically, Hispanics and NHB patients had lower office-based and outpatient expenditures. Additionally, Hispanic patients incurred lower hospital inpatient expenditures than NHW patients. There is a need for further studies delving into finding reasons for these differences in expenditures, such as behavioral and belief systems that may limit the use of care among racial a","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1075-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467764/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-a.s1
Brenda L Bohnsack, James Bowerman, K David Epley
Amblyopia is the most common cause of vision impairment in children and presents as reduced visual acuity caused by suppression of neurologic signals from an eye. Traditional treatments include penalizing the better-seeing eye by occlusion, most commonly with patching. This does not address the binocular vision deficits of amblyopia and leaves most patients with unresolved disease and permanent vision loss. Digital, dual-acting therapy (Luminopia, Luminopia, Inc) was cleared in October 2021 via US Food and Drug Administration de novo market authorization for the treatment of amblyopia associated with anisometropia and/or with mild strabismus in children aged 4-7 years. Binocular digital therapy is now included in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's amblyopia treatment guidelines, the Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP). The pivotal randomized, controlled phase 3 trial evaluating Luminopia was recognized in the PPP as Level I+ evidence. Pediatric ophthalmologists and national and regional health plan leaders formed a roundtable panel to evaluate disease impact, the current treatment landscape, and guideline-based treatment principles. At the conclusion of this discussion, the panel developed a unanimous recommendation for the appropriate clinical and value-driven use of Luminopia and payer coverage recommendations. Luminopia is recommended for use to treat amblyopia and should be covered by payer policies. Duration of therapy should be based on patient needs as determined by prescribing physician expertise. Luminopia may be covered under either medical or pharmacy benefit. Step-edits may be used, and documentation of inadequate response to other therapies may be necessary to obtain coverage. Clinical documentation and medical letters of exception may also be needed for off-label use of Luminopia. The recommendations achieved in this roundtable based on the clinical evidence available provide a justification for broad payer coverage and improved patient access to a full range of evidence-based amblyopia treatments.
{"title":"Recommendations for use and coverage of digital, binocular treatments for amblyopia.","authors":"Brenda L Bohnsack, James Bowerman, K David Epley","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-a.s1","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-a.s1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amblyopia is the most common cause of vision impairment in children and presents as reduced visual acuity caused by suppression of neurologic signals from an eye. Traditional treatments include penalizing the better-seeing eye by occlusion, most commonly with patching. This does not address the binocular vision deficits of amblyopia and leaves most patients with unresolved disease and permanent vision loss. Digital, dual-acting therapy (Luminopia, Luminopia, Inc) was cleared in October 2021 via US Food and Drug Administration de novo market authorization for the treatment of amblyopia associated with anisometropia and/or with mild strabismus in children aged 4-7 years. Binocular digital therapy is now included in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's amblyopia treatment guidelines, the Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP). The pivotal randomized, controlled phase 3 trial evaluating Luminopia was recognized in the PPP as Level I+ evidence. Pediatric ophthalmologists and national and regional health plan leaders formed a roundtable panel to evaluate disease impact, the current treatment landscape, and guideline-based treatment principles. At the conclusion of this discussion, the panel developed a unanimous recommendation for the appropriate clinical and value-driven use of Luminopia and payer coverage recommendations. Luminopia is recommended for use to treat amblyopia and should be covered by payer policies. Duration of therapy should be based on patient needs as determined by prescribing physician expertise. Luminopia may be covered under either medical or pharmacy benefit. Step-edits may be used, and documentation of inadequate response to other therapies may be necessary to obtain coverage. Clinical documentation and medical letters of exception may also be needed for off-label use of Luminopia. The recommendations achieved in this roundtable based on the clinical evidence available provide a justification for broad payer coverage and improved patient access to a full range of evidence-based amblyopia treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10-a Suppl","pages":"S1-S10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467751/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-d.s1
The AMCP Poster Abstract Program provides a forum for authors to share their research with the managed care pharmacy community. Authors submit their abstracts to AMCP, and each abstract is reviewed by a team of peer reviewers and editors. All accepted abstracts are presented as posters at AMCP's Annual and Nexus meetings. These abstracts are also available through the AMCP meeting app. This JMCP supplement publishes all abstracts that were peer reviewed and accepted for presentation at AMCP Nexus 2025. Abstracts submitted in the Student and Encore categories did not undergo peer review; therefore, these abstracts are not included in the supplement.
{"title":"Poster Abstracts - NEXUS 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-d.s1","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-d.s1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The AMCP Poster Abstract Program provides a forum for authors to share their research with the managed care pharmacy community. Authors submit their abstracts to AMCP, and each abstract is reviewed by a team of peer reviewers and editors. All accepted abstracts are presented as posters at AMCP's Annual and Nexus meetings. These abstracts are also available through the AMCP meeting app. This JMCP supplement publishes all abstracts that were peer reviewed and accepted for presentation at AMCP Nexus 2025. Abstracts submitted in the Student and Encore categories did not undergo peer review; therefore, these abstracts are not included in the supplement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10-d Suppl","pages":"S1-S152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560628/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145345520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-b.s1
Bridget Flavin, Denise Wolff, Laura Bobolts, Gaurang Gandhi, Ryan Haumschild, Neil Iyengar, Michael Kobernick, Rebecca Lich, Bhavesh Shah
Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women in the United States, and its impact on both patients and their caregivers, particularly in advanced or metastatic disease, is substantial. Additionally, for the most common breast cancer subtype (estrogen receptor [ER]+/human endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-), the treatment landscape for metastatic disease is continuously evolving, making appropriate therapy sequencing challenging. To discuss navigating the rapidly changing landscape of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), AMCP Market Insights virtually convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in February 2025. Key insights from the discussion on ER+/HER2- mBC included addressing the patient care journey, maintaining high-quality care, managing the impact to payers, evaluating new and emerging therapies, and looking toward the future. Suggested payer best practices in ER+/HER2- mBC also emerged from the discussion.
{"title":"AMCP Market Insights: Navigating the rapidly changing landscape of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.","authors":"Bridget Flavin, Denise Wolff, Laura Bobolts, Gaurang Gandhi, Ryan Haumschild, Neil Iyengar, Michael Kobernick, Rebecca Lich, Bhavesh Shah","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-b.s1","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-b.s1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women in the United States, and its impact on both patients and their caregivers, particularly in advanced or metastatic disease, is substantial. Additionally, for the most common breast cancer subtype (estrogen receptor [ER]+/human endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-), the treatment landscape for metastatic disease is continuously evolving, making appropriate therapy sequencing challenging. To discuss navigating the rapidly changing landscape of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), AMCP Market Insights virtually convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in February 2025. Key insights from the discussion on ER+/HER2- mBC included addressing the patient care journey, maintaining high-quality care, managing the impact to payers, evaluating new and emerging therapies, and looking toward the future. Suggested payer best practices in ER+/HER2- mBC also emerged from the discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10-b Suppl","pages":"S1-S14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.997
Dustin R Donald, Autumn D Zuckerman, Kevin Dee, Nicolas Gargurevich, Leena Choi, Strong Oboh, Chelsea P Renfro
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication in transplant recipients, with refractory or resistant infections making up a subset of this population. Maribavir, indicated for CMV infection that is refractory to first-line treatments, is a high-cost, limited-distribution specialty medication that requires frequent laboratory monitoring to assess efficacy.
Objective: To evaluate outcomes of health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) management of maribavir including waste and cost avoidance, medication access, and pharmacist interventions during treatment.
Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of patients prescribed maribavir from April 1, 2022, to August 1, 2024. Included patients were prescribed maribavir for posttransplant CMV infection/disease that was refractory to treatment with ganciclovir, valganciclovir, cidofovir, or foscarnet. Outcomes included the number of dispenses that were reduced by pharmacist interventions that led to medication waste avoidance and the cost avoidance of these interventions, time to medication access, and the number of pharmacist interventions recommending laboratory tests or medication discontinuation during treatment. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. To estimate costs avoided by pharmacy and payer, cost avoidance was calculated by multiplying the 14-day supply of maribavir that was not dispensed during the final treatment course because of pharmacist intervention by the average wholesale price (AWP), AWP minus 20% (AWP-20%), and wholesale acquisition cost (WAC).
Results: Included patients (N = 33) were predominately male (64%) with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 50-66 years). Five patients were required to repeat treatment with maribavir multiple times because of CMV reactivation totaling 41 unique instances of maribavir use. The most common transplant type was kidney (n = 11), and all patients were donor CMV positive (n = 33). 29 patients were able to fill with the institution's HSSP with 36 instances of maribavir use and 113 fills of maribavir. Of these 36 instances, 12 (33%) had the final dispense of the treatment course reduced because of pharmacist intervention, amounting to a cost avoidance range of $143,421 (AWP-20%) to $179,276 (AWP). Maribavir insurance prior approval (PA) was required for 31 (76%) instances of medication use, with median PAs occurring the same day as referral (IQR = 0-2). Of the 41 instances of maribavir use, 8 (20%) required an intervention from the pharmacist recommending CMV laboratory testing be completed.
Conclusions: Pharmacists successfully obtained timely insurance PAs for maribavir. During treatment, pharmacists reduced unnecessary fills, resulting in large cost and waste avoidance. Future research is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of interventions by specialty pharmac
{"title":"Optimizing maribavir management: The role of health system specialty pharmacies in access, monitoring, and waste reduction.","authors":"Dustin R Donald, Autumn D Zuckerman, Kevin Dee, Nicolas Gargurevich, Leena Choi, Strong Oboh, Chelsea P Renfro","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.997","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication in transplant recipients, with refractory or resistant infections making up a subset of this population. Maribavir, indicated for CMV infection that is refractory to first-line treatments, is a high-cost, limited-distribution specialty medication that requires frequent laboratory monitoring to assess efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate outcomes of health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) management of maribavir including waste and cost avoidance, medication access, and pharmacist interventions during treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of patients prescribed maribavir from April 1, 2022, to August 1, 2024. Included patients were prescribed maribavir for posttransplant CMV infection/disease that was refractory to treatment with ganciclovir, valganciclovir, cidofovir, or foscarnet. Outcomes included the number of dispenses that were reduced by pharmacist interventions that led to medication waste avoidance and the cost avoidance of these interventions, time to medication access, and the number of pharmacist interventions recommending laboratory tests or medication discontinuation during treatment. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. To estimate costs avoided by pharmacy and payer, cost avoidance was calculated by multiplying the 14-day supply of maribavir that was not dispensed during the final treatment course because of pharmacist intervention by the average wholesale price (AWP), AWP minus 20% (AWP-20%), and wholesale acquisition cost (WAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included patients (N = 33) were predominately male (64%) with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 50-66 years). Five patients were required to repeat treatment with maribavir multiple times because of CMV reactivation totaling 41 unique instances of maribavir use. The most common transplant type was kidney (n = 11), and all patients were donor CMV positive (n = 33). 29 patients were able to fill with the institution's HSSP with 36 instances of maribavir use and 113 fills of maribavir. Of these 36 instances, 12 (33%) had the final dispense of the treatment course reduced because of pharmacist intervention, amounting to a cost avoidance range of $143,421 (AWP-20%) to $179,276 (AWP). Maribavir insurance prior approval (PA) was required for 31 (76%) instances of medication use, with median PAs occurring the same day as referral (IQR = 0-2). Of the 41 instances of maribavir use, 8 (20%) required an intervention from the pharmacist recommending CMV laboratory testing be completed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacists successfully obtained timely insurance PAs for maribavir. During treatment, pharmacists reduced unnecessary fills, resulting in large cost and waste avoidance. Future research is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of interventions by specialty pharmac","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"997-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467757/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-c.s1
Bridget Flavin, Denise Wolff, Laura R Bobolts, Tara Graff, Kirollos Hanna, Ryan Haumschild, Timothy Mok, Bhavesh Shah
Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are an emerging treatment modality particularly in hematologic malignancies such as the non-Hodgkin lymphomas follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although bsAbs offer opportunities in the treatment of these conditions, they also present challenges, and additional longer-term data are needed to determine their optimal role. To discuss managed care approaches to bsAbs with a focus on FL and DLBCL, AMCP Market Insights virtually convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in April 2025. Key insights from the discussion included that clinical efficacy is a primary consideration when evaluating the role of bsAbs in FL and DLBCL and that ongoing data collection is necessary for increased certainty in long-term outcomes, treatment comparisons, and real-world experience. Other insights related to treatment choice, site-of-care considerations, the evolving place of bsAbs in FL and DLBCL therapy, economic factors, and social determinants of health and equity. Suggested payer best practices for bsAbs in FL and DLBCL also emerged from the discussion.
{"title":"AMCP Market Insights: Managed care approaches to bispecific antibodies with a focus on follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.","authors":"Bridget Flavin, Denise Wolff, Laura R Bobolts, Tara Graff, Kirollos Hanna, Ryan Haumschild, Timothy Mok, Bhavesh Shah","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-c.s1","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-c.s1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are an emerging treatment modality particularly in hematologic malignancies such as the non-Hodgkin lymphomas follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although bsAbs offer opportunities in the treatment of these conditions, they also present challenges, and additional longer-term data are needed to determine their optimal role. To discuss managed care approaches to bsAbs with a focus on FL and DLBCL, AMCP Market Insights virtually convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in April 2025. Key insights from the discussion included that clinical efficacy is a primary consideration when evaluating the role of bsAbs in FL and DLBCL and that ongoing data collection is necessary for increased certainty in long-term outcomes, treatment comparisons, and real-world experience. Other insights related to treatment choice, site-of-care considerations, the evolving place of bsAbs in FL and DLBCL therapy, economic factors, and social determinants of health and equity. Suggested payer best practices for bsAbs in FL and DLBCL also emerged from the discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10-c Suppl","pages":"S1-S10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467760/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}