首页 > 最新文献

Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy最新文献

英文 中文
Associations of oseltamivir with neuropsychiatric and behavioral adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 奥司他韦与神经精神和行为不良事件的关联:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1051
Hye Su Jeong, Yeo Wool Lee, Taeho Greg Rhee, Sung Ryul Shim

Background: Influenza causes approximately 3-5 million severe cases and 290,000-650,000 deaths annually, and oseltamivir is considered the first-line pharmacotherapy. Recent reports on neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) associated with the use of oseltamivir necessitated a systematic safety profile review.

Objective: To systematically review and meta-synthesize the evidence on the associations of oseltamivir with adverse NPEs and behavioral events.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through October 31, 2024. Studies comparing oseltamivir with other control groups for NPEs were analyzed. Outcomes were categorized into (1) affective disorders, (2) neuropsychiatric symptoms, (3) anxiety disorders, (4) schizophrenic/psychotic disorders, and (5) suicide-related behaviors.

Results: 9 studies with 1,139-3,352,015 patients were identified. Oseltamivir significantly associated with a lower overall NPE incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72-0.97), except in patients younger than 20 years. Subgroup analyses showed significant association with a lower incidence risk in suicide attempts across all ages (RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.77) and in schizophrenia/psychotic disorders for patients younger than 20 years (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.93).

Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive meta-analysis examining the associations of oseltamivir with various NPEs and behavioral adverse events, and we found no evidence supporting increased risks of these adverse events with oseltamivir use.

背景:流感每年造成约300万至500万严重病例和29万至65万人死亡,奥司他韦被认为是一线药物治疗。最近关于与使用奥司他韦相关的神经精神事件(npe)的报道需要进行系统的安全性评估。目的:系统回顾和综合奥司他韦与不良NPEs和行为事件相关的证据。方法:我们使用PubMed/Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,从开始到2024年10月31日,按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。比较奥司他韦与其他对照组治疗npe的研究进行了分析。结果分为(1)情感障碍,(2)神经精神症状,(3)焦虑障碍,(4)精神分裂症/精神障碍,(5)自杀相关行为。结果:9项研究共纳入1139 - 3352015例患者。奥司他韦与较低的总体NPE发生率显著相关(风险比[RR] = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72-0.97),年龄小于20岁的患者除外。亚组分析显示,所有年龄段的自杀企图发生率(RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.77)和20岁以下的精神分裂症/精神障碍患者(RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.93)与较低的发生率风险显著相关。结论:这是第一个全面的荟萃分析,研究了奥司他韦与各种npe和行为不良事件的关联,我们没有发现证据支持使用奥司他韦会增加这些不良事件的风险。
{"title":"Associations of oseltamivir with neuropsychiatric and behavioral adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hye Su Jeong, Yeo Wool Lee, Taeho Greg Rhee, Sung Ryul Shim","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1051","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza causes approximately 3-5 million severe cases and 290,000-650,000 deaths annually, and oseltamivir is considered the first-line pharmacotherapy. Recent reports on neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) associated with the use of oseltamivir necessitated a systematic safety profile review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and meta-synthesize the evidence on the associations of oseltamivir with adverse NPEs and behavioral events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through October 31, 2024. Studies comparing oseltamivir with other control groups for NPEs were analyzed. Outcomes were categorized into (1) affective disorders, (2) neuropsychiatric symptoms, (3) anxiety disorders, (4) schizophrenic/psychotic disorders, and (5) suicide-related behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>9 studies with 1,139-3,352,015 patients were identified. Oseltamivir significantly associated with a lower overall NPE incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72-0.97), except in patients younger than 20 years. Subgroup analyses showed significant association with a lower incidence risk in suicide attempts across all ages (RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.77) and in schizophrenia/psychotic disorders for patients younger than 20 years (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first comprehensive meta-analysis examining the associations of oseltamivir with various NPEs and behavioral adverse events, and we found no evidence supporting increased risks of these adverse events with oseltamivir use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1051-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467762/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and health care resource utilization and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. 2型糖尿病合并慢性肾病患者尿白蛋白/肌酐比值变化与医疗资源利用及费用
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-22 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.24302
Kevin M Pantalone, Rakesh Singh, Aozhou Wu, Keith A Betts, Yan Chen, Youssef Mk Farag, Scott Beeman, Yuxian Du, Sheldon X Kong, Todd Williamson, Qixin Li, Brendan Rabideau, Navdeep Tangri

Background: Albuminuria, indicated by an elevated urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) at baseline, is consistently associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased economic burden. The effect of a change in albuminuria over time on health care resource utilization is not well understood.

Objective: To assess the association between changes in UACR and economic outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: The Optum electronic health records database (January 2007 to September 2021) was used to identify adult patients with albuminuria, measured by UACR of 30 mg/g or more (initial test) after diagnosis of T2D and CKD. UACR change was categorized as increased (>30% change), stable (30% increase to 30% decrease), or decreased (>30% change) based on the percentage of change between the initial test and the follow-up test (the last test within 0.5 to 2 years after the initial test). All-cause inpatient (IP) admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient (OP) visits, and total medical costs were evaluated during the year after the follow-up test. The association of UACR change with health care resource utilization (HRU) was evaluated using Poisson regression, adjusting for key baseline characteristics. Medical costs (2022 US dollars) were estimated using a unit costing approach based on HRU frequencies.

Results: Among 144,814 eligible patients included in the study, 81,084 (56%) had decreased, 31,766 (22%) had stable, and 31,964 (22%) had increased UACR. Patients with increased UACR had higher HRU (IP admissions: 0.24 per-person per-year [PPPY]; ED visits: 0.35 PPPY; OP visits: 21.20 PPPY) and annual medical costs ($15,013 PPPY) than patients with stable UACR (IP: 0.18 PPPY; ED: 0.31 PPPY; OP: 19.13 PPPY; costs: $12,521 PPPY) and decreased UACR (IP: 0.17 PPPY, ED: 0.31 PPPY, OP: 19.90 PPPY; costs: $12,329 PPPY). Compared with patients with increased UACR, those with decreased UACR had adjusted incidence rate ratios of 0.79 (95% CI = 0.76-0.82) for IP, 0.88 (0.85-0.92) for ED, and 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for OP, and patients with stable UACR had adjusted incidence rate ratios of 0.82 (0.78-0.86) for IP, 0.91 (0.87-0.95) for ED, and 0.94 (0.92-0.95) for OP (all P values of <0.001).

Conclusions: Among patients with CKD and T2D who had albuminuria, an increase in UACR over time was associated with significantly higher HRU and costs compared with patients with stable or decreased UACR. Managed care organizations and other health care decision-makers should consider strategies that enhance monitoring and management of UACR in patients with CKD and T2D to potentially reduce HRU and associated costs.

背景:尿白蛋白与肌酐比(UACR)基线值升高表明蛋白尿始终与不良临床结果和经济负担增加相关。蛋白尿随时间变化对卫生保健资源利用的影响尚不清楚。目的:评估慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)合并2型糖尿病(T2D)患者UACR变化与经济结局之间的关系。方法:使用Optum电子健康记录数据库(2007年1月至2021年9月)识别诊断为T2D和CKD的成年白蛋白尿患者,UACR测量为30 mg/g或更高(初始试验)。根据初始测试和后续测试(初始测试后0.5至2年内的最后一次测试)之间的变化百分比,UACR变化分为增加(>30%变化),稳定(30%增加至30%减少)或减少(>30%变化)。在随访测试后的一年内,评估全因住院(IP)入院、急诊(ED)就诊、门诊(OP)就诊和总医疗费用。UACR变化与卫生保健资源利用率(HRU)的关系使用泊松回归进行评估,调整关键基线特征。使用基于HRU频率的单位成本法估算医疗费用(2022年美元)。结果:在纳入研究的144,814例符合条件的患者中,81,084例(56%)UACR下降,31,766例(22%)稳定,31,964例(22%)UACR升高。与UACR稳定(IP: 0.18 PPPY; ED: 0.31 PPPY; OP: 19.13 PPPY;费用:12,521 PPPY)和UACR下降(IP: 0.17 PPPY, ED: 0.31 PPPY, OP: 19.90 PPPY;费用:12,329 PPPY)的患者相比,UACR增加的患者HRU (IP: 0.24 PPPY每人每年[PPPY]; ED访问量:0.35 PPPY; OP访问量:21.20 PPPY)和年度医疗费用(15,013 PPPY)更高。与UACR升高的患者相比,UACR降低的患者IP调整发生率比为0.79 (95% CI = 0.76-0.82), ED调整发生率比为0.88 (0.85-0.92),OP调整发生率比为0.96 (0.95-0.97),UACR稳定的患者IP调整发生率比为0.82 (0.78-0.86),ED调整发生率比为0.91 (0.87-0.95),OP调整发生率比为0.94(0.92-0.95)。在患有蛋白尿的CKD和T2D患者中,与UACR稳定或降低的患者相比,随着时间的推移,UACR的增加与HRU和成本的显著升高相关。管理医疗机构和其他医疗保健决策者应考虑加强CKD和T2D患者UACR监测和管理的策略,以潜在地降低HRU和相关费用。
{"title":"Changes in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and health care resource utilization and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.","authors":"Kevin M Pantalone, Rakesh Singh, Aozhou Wu, Keith A Betts, Yan Chen, Youssef Mk Farag, Scott Beeman, Yuxian Du, Sheldon X Kong, Todd Williamson, Qixin Li, Brendan Rabideau, Navdeep Tangri","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24302","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Albuminuria, indicated by an elevated urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) at baseline, is consistently associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased economic burden. The effect of a change in albuminuria over time on health care resource utilization is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between changes in UACR and economic outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Optum electronic health records database (January 2007 to September 2021) was used to identify adult patients with albuminuria, measured by UACR of 30 mg/g or more (initial test) after diagnosis of T2D and CKD. UACR change was categorized as increased (>30% change), stable (30% increase to 30% decrease), or decreased (>30% change) based on the percentage of change between the initial test and the follow-up test (the last test within 0.5 to 2 years after the initial test). All-cause inpatient (IP) admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient (OP) visits, and total medical costs were evaluated during the year after the follow-up test. The association of UACR change with health care resource utilization (HRU) was evaluated using Poisson regression, adjusting for key baseline characteristics. Medical costs (2022 US dollars) were estimated using a unit costing approach based on HRU frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 144,814 eligible patients included in the study, 81,084 (56%) had decreased, 31,766 (22%) had stable, and 31,964 (22%) had increased UACR. Patients with increased UACR had higher HRU (IP admissions: 0.24 per-person per-year [PPPY]; ED visits: 0.35 PPPY; OP visits: 21.20 PPPY) and annual medical costs ($15,013 PPPY) than patients with stable UACR (IP: 0.18 PPPY; ED: 0.31 PPPY; OP: 19.13 PPPY; costs: $12,521 PPPY) and decreased UACR (IP: 0.17 PPPY, ED: 0.31 PPPY, OP: 19.90 PPPY; costs: $12,329 PPPY). Compared with patients with increased UACR, those with decreased UACR had adjusted incidence rate ratios of 0.79 (95% CI = 0.76-0.82) for IP, 0.88 (0.85-0.92) for ED, and 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for OP, and patients with stable UACR had adjusted incidence rate ratios of 0.82 (0.78-0.86) for IP, 0.91 (0.87-0.95) for ED, and 0.94 (0.92-0.95) for OP (all <i>P</i> values of <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with CKD and T2D who had albuminuria, an increase in UACR over time was associated with significantly higher HRU and costs compared with patients with stable or decreased UACR. Managed care organizations and other health care decision-makers should consider strategies that enhance monitoring and management of UACR in patients with CKD and T2D to potentially reduce HRU and associated costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1017-1028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467748/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patterns and costs associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use in US adults with type 2 diabetes. 胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在美国成人2型糖尿病患者中的应用模式和成本
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1029
Jun Wu, Alexandra Perez, Patrick W Sullivan

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) offer cardiorenal benefits in diabetes management. Since 2020, public awareness of GLP-1 RAs for diabetes, weight loss, and the prevention of cardiovascular disease has led to a surge in their utilization. However, the high cost of GLP-1 RAs and limitations in insurance coverage have been considered significant barriers to access. Current knowledge regarding how GLP-1 RA use affects total health care costs in diabetes care after 2020 in the United States remains limited. Consequently, further research is needed to examine the financial burden of GLP-1 RA use on patients and payers, as well as its overall impact on total health care costs at the national level.

Objective: To examine GLP-1 RA utilization and association with health care costs among US adults with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Using data from the 2021-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the study sample included individuals (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Outcomes included GLP-1 RA use and all-cause and diabetes-related health care costs, including medical and prescription drug costs paid by patients and insurers. Generalized linear regression with a log link and gamma distribution was used to assess the effect of GLP-1 RA use on health care costs, adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.

Results: Among 3,587 eligible adults with type 2 diabetes, 637 (18.8%) used GLP-1 RAs, representing an estimated 3.66 million US adults-a marked increase compared with pre-2020 estimates of less than 10%. Fewer older adults (aged ≥65 years) used GLP-1 RAs (35.1%) compared with adults aged 45-64 years (50.6%). The average annual per-person cost of GLP-1 RA was $6,947. Although insurance covered more than 95% of GLP-1 RA cost, these medications represented a substantial proportion of diabetes care costs: 63.3% of antidiabetic drug costs and 55.7% of total diabetes-related costs among GLP-1 RA users. After adjustment, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a 219% increase in diabetes-related costs and a 55.3% increase in total all-cause health care costs.

Conclusions: GLP-1 RA utilization among US adults with type 2 diabetes has substantially increased, with use in 2021-2022 nearly double that of the period prior to 2020. The higher health care costs associated with taking GLP-1 RAs were largely attributable to high drug costs, of which over 95% were covered by insurance.

背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)在糖尿病治疗中对心脏肾脏有益。自2020年以来,公众对GLP-1 RAs在糖尿病、减肥和预防心血管疾病方面的认识导致其使用激增。然而,GLP-1 RAs的高成本和保险范围的限制被认为是获得的重大障碍。目前关于GLP-1 RA使用如何影响2020年后美国糖尿病护理总医疗费用的知识仍然有限。因此,需要进一步研究GLP-1 RA对患者和付款人的经济负担,以及其对国家一级总医疗保健费用的总体影响。目的:研究GLP-1 RA在美国成人2型糖尿病患者中的应用及其与医疗费用的关系。方法:使用2021-2022年医疗支出面板调查的数据,研究样本包括诊断为2型糖尿病的个体(年龄≥18岁)。结果包括GLP-1 RA的使用以及全因和糖尿病相关的医疗保健费用,包括患者和保险公司支付的医疗和处方药费用。采用对数链接和伽马分布的广义线性回归来评估GLP-1 RA使用对医疗保健成本的影响,并根据社会人口统计学和健康相关特征进行调整。结果:在3587名符合条件的2型糖尿病成年人中,637人(18.8%)使用GLP-1 RAs,约代表366万美国成年人,与2020年之前的估计相比显著增加,不到10%。与45-64岁的成年人(50.6%)相比,老年人(≥65岁)较少使用GLP-1 RAs(35.1%)。GLP-1 RA的人均年平均费用为6,947美元。虽然保险覆盖了超过95%的GLP-1 RA费用,但这些药物占糖尿病护理费用的很大一部分:在GLP-1 RA使用者中,抗糖尿病药物费用占63.3%,糖尿病相关总费用占55.7%。调整后,GLP-1 RA的使用与糖尿病相关费用增加219%和总全因医疗保健费用增加55.3%相关。结论:GLP-1 RA在美国成人2型糖尿病患者中的使用率大幅增加,2021-2022年的使用率几乎是2020年之前的两倍。与服用GLP-1 RAs相关的较高医疗保健费用主要归因于高药费,其中95%以上由保险支付。
{"title":"Patterns and costs associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use in US adults with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Jun Wu, Alexandra Perez, Patrick W Sullivan","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1029","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) offer cardiorenal benefits in diabetes management. Since 2020, public awareness of GLP-1 RAs for diabetes, weight loss, and the prevention of cardiovascular disease has led to a surge in their utilization. However, the high cost of GLP-1 RAs and limitations in insurance coverage have been considered significant barriers to access. Current knowledge regarding how GLP-1 RA use affects total health care costs in diabetes care after 2020 in the United States remains limited. Consequently, further research is needed to examine the financial burden of GLP-1 RA use on patients and payers, as well as its overall impact on total health care costs at the national level.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine GLP-1 RA utilization and association with health care costs among US adults with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the 2021-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the study sample included individuals (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Outcomes included GLP-1 RA use and all-cause and diabetes-related health care costs, including medical and prescription drug costs paid by patients and insurers. Generalized linear regression with a log link and gamma distribution was used to assess the effect of GLP-1 RA use on health care costs, adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,587 eligible adults with type 2 diabetes, 637 (18.8%) used GLP-1 RAs, representing an estimated 3.66 million US adults-a marked increase compared with pre-2020 estimates of less than 10%. Fewer older adults (aged ≥65 years) used GLP-1 RAs (35.1%) compared with adults aged 45-64 years (50.6%). The average annual per-person cost of GLP-1 RA was $6,947. Although insurance covered more than 95% of GLP-1 RA cost, these medications represented a substantial proportion of diabetes care costs: 63.3% of antidiabetic drug costs and 55.7% of total diabetes-related costs among GLP-1 RA users. After adjustment, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a 219% increase in diabetes-related costs and a 55.3% increase in total all-cause health care costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1 RA utilization among US adults with type 2 diabetes has substantially increased, with use in 2021-2022 nearly double that of the period prior to 2020. The higher health care costs associated with taking GLP-1 RAs were largely attributable to high drug costs, of which over 95% were covered by insurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1029-1038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467763/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical and economic impact of recurrence in unresected non-small cell lung cancer treated with primary stereotactic body radiotherapy: A real-world study using SEER-Medicare data. 原发性立体定向放射治疗对未切除的非小细胞肺癌复发的临床和经济影响:一项使用SEER-Medicare数据的真实世界研究。
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006
Pragya Rai, Andrew Song, Su Zhang, Yan Song, Chi Gao, Anya Jiang, Jiayang Li, Peixi Jiang, James Signorovitch, Ashwini Arunachalam, Ayman Samkari, Megan E Daly

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the recommended treatment for inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although prior research has assessed overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates post-SBRT, limited data exist on the clinical and economic impact of recurrence and the association between event-free survival (EFS) and OS in this patient population.

Objective: To compare OS, health care resource utilization (HRU), and costs between patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving primary SBRT, with and without recurrence, and assess the association between real-world EFS (rwEFS) and OS.

Methods: The SEER-Medicare database (2007-2020) was used to identify patients with stage I-IIB (N0) NSCLC receiving primary SBRT. Patients were categorized into recurrence and nonrecurrence cohorts based on disease recurrence status post-SBRT. OS, all-cause and NSCLC-related HRU, and health care costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence. The correlation between OS and rwEFS was assessed using the normal scores rank correlation and landmark analyses.

Results: A total of 3,014 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,455 (48.3%) experiencing disease recurrence. Median OS was significantly shorter for the recurrence cohort (18.9 months) compared with the nonrecurrence cohort (51.4 months; log-rank P < 0.001). Patients with recurrence had a 2.16-fold higher risk of death (95% CI = 1.94-2.42; P < 0.001). HRU and health care costs were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort, with adjusted monthly all-cause and NSCLC-related costs per patient exceeding those of nonrecurrence patients by $5,458 and $3,838, respectively (both P < 0.001). A significant correlation was observed between rwEFS and OS (ρ = 0.74; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Recurrence after SBRT in unresected, early-stage NSCLC was associated with worse survival and substantial economic burden. The strong correlation between rwEFS and OS suggests that EFS may serve as a good predictor for OS and be a clinically relevant trial endpoint. These findings highlight the need for novel strategies to prevent/delay recurrence.

背景:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)是不能手术的早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的推荐治疗方法。尽管先前的研究已经评估了sbrt后的总生存期(OS)和复发率,但在该患者群体中,关于复发的临床和经济影响以及无事件生存期(EFS)和OS之间关系的数据有限。目的:比较接受原发性SBRT的早期非小细胞肺癌患者的生存期、医疗资源利用率(HRU)和成本,并评估真实世界EFS (rwEFS)与生存期之间的关系。方法:使用SEER-Medicare数据库(2007-2020)来识别接受原发性SBRT治疗的I-IIB期(N0) NSCLC患者。根据sbrt后的疾病复发情况,将患者分为复发组和非复发组。比较复发和无复发患者的OS、全因和非小细胞肺癌相关HRU和医疗费用。OS与rwEFS的相关性采用正态评分、秩相关和里程碑分析进行评估。结果:共有3014例患者符合纳入标准,其中1455例(48.3%)出现疾病复发。复发组的中位生存期(18.9个月)明显短于非复发组(51.4个月);log-rank P P P P结论:未切除的早期非小细胞肺癌SBRT后复发与较差的生存率和沉重的经济负担相关。rwEFS和OS之间的强相关性表明,EFS可以作为OS的良好预测因子,并且是临床相关的试验终点。这些发现强调需要新的策略来预防/延迟复发。
{"title":"Clinical and economic impact of recurrence in unresected non-small cell lung cancer treated with primary stereotactic body radiotherapy: A real-world study using SEER-Medicare data.","authors":"Pragya Rai, Andrew Song, Su Zhang, Yan Song, Chi Gao, Anya Jiang, Jiayang Li, Peixi Jiang, James Signorovitch, Ashwini Arunachalam, Ayman Samkari, Megan E Daly","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the recommended treatment for inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although prior research has assessed overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates post-SBRT, limited data exist on the clinical and economic impact of recurrence and the association between event-free survival (EFS) and OS in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare OS, health care resource utilization (HRU), and costs between patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving primary SBRT, with and without recurrence, and assess the association between real-world EFS (rwEFS) and OS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SEER-Medicare database (2007-2020) was used to identify patients with stage I-IIB (N0) NSCLC receiving primary SBRT. Patients were categorized into recurrence and nonrecurrence cohorts based on disease recurrence status post-SBRT. OS, all-cause and NSCLC-related HRU, and health care costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence. The correlation between OS and rwEFS was assessed using the normal scores rank correlation and landmark analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,014 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,455 (48.3%) experiencing disease recurrence. Median OS was significantly shorter for the recurrence cohort (18.9 months) compared with the nonrecurrence cohort (51.4 months; log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients with recurrence had a 2.16-fold higher risk of death (95% CI = 1.94-2.42; <i>P</i> < 0.001). HRU and health care costs were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort, with adjusted monthly all-cause and NSCLC-related costs per patient exceeding those of nonrecurrence patients by $5,458 and $3,838, respectively (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). A significant correlation was observed between rwEFS and OS (ρ = 0.74; <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recurrence after SBRT in unresected, early-stage NSCLC was associated with worse survival and substantial economic burden. The strong correlation between rwEFS and OS suggests that EFS may serve as a good predictor for OS and be a clinically relevant trial endpoint. These findings highlight the need for novel strategies to prevent/delay recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1006-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467756/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining racial and ethnic differences in health care expenditures among older adults with arthritis in the United States. 研究美国老年关节炎患者在医疗保健支出方面的种族差异。
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1075
Samuel C Ofili, Paroma Arefin, Olajumoke A Olateju, Sujit S Sansgiry
<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 65 million Americans suffer from arthritis, which is the primary cause of disability in older adults. Arthritis is also a leading disease, with more than $600 billion in medical expenses each year. There is, however, little research on health care expenditure by race and ethnicity among older adults with arthritis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the racial and ethnic differences in health care expenditures among older adults with arthritis in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multiyear cross-sectional study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data (2018-2022) analyzed health care expenditures of adults aged 65 years and older with arthritis across different races and ethnicities. All-cause expenditures (total, office-based visits, hospital inpatient visits, prescription medicine, and outpatient visits) were compared between Hispanic patients, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients, and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, adjusting for covariates using SAS version 9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 15,345 adults (weighted frequency = 29,915,198) with arthritis. The mean total annual health care expenditure was $15,052 (95% CI = $14,435-$15,667) for all adults with arthritis. Although Hispanic patients had the lowest total expenditure ($14,159, 95% CI = $11,955-$16,363), NHB and NHW patients had similar total annual health care expenditures at $15,623 (95% CI = $12,228-$19,015) and $15,237 (95% CI = $14,599-$15,876), respectively. After adjustment for covariates, Hispanic and NHB patients spent 34% (95% CI = 24%-43%) and 31% (95% CI = 22%-39%) less than NHW patients (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). This was largely because of lower office-based expenditures, where both Hispanic and NHB patients spent approximately 52% (95% CI = 42%-60%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) less than NHW patients. Also, Hispanic patients incurred 23% (95% CI = 1%-41%) lower hospital inpatient expenditure (<i>P</i>  =  0.0406) than NHW patients. For outpatient visits, Hispanic patients spent 71% (95% CI = 59%-80%) and NHB patients 50% (95% CI = 34%-62%) (both <i>P</i> < 0.0001) lower than NHW patients. Hispanic and NHB patients differed only in outpatient expenditures, where NHB patients significantly spent 75% more than Hispanic patients (95% CI = 16%-162%, <i>P</i>  =  0.007) after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Total health care expenditures were substantially lower for Hispanic and NHB patients with arthritis compared with NHW patients after adjusting for various covariates. Specifically, Hispanics and NHB patients had lower office-based and outpatient expenditures. Additionally, Hispanic patients incurred lower hospital inpatient expenditures than NHW patients. There is a need for further studies delving into finding reasons for these differences in expenditures, such as behavioral and belief systems that may limit the use of care among racial a
背景:超过6500万美国人患有关节炎,这是导致老年人残疾的主要原因。关节炎也是一种主要疾病,每年的医疗费用超过6000亿美元。然而,对患有关节炎的老年人按种族和民族划分的医疗保健支出的研究很少。目的:研究美国老年关节炎患者在医疗保健支出方面的种族差异。方法:使用医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)数据(2018-2022)进行回顾性多年横断面研究,分析不同种族和民族65岁及以上关节炎患者的医疗保健支出。使用SAS 9.4版对协变量进行调整,比较西班牙裔患者、非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)患者和非西班牙裔白人(NHW)患者的全因支出(总、基于办公室的就诊、住院就诊、处方药和门诊就诊)。结果:该研究分析了15,345名患有关节炎的成年人(加权频率= 29,915,198)。所有患有关节炎的成年人的平均年度医疗保健支出总额为15,052美元(95% CI = 14,435- 15,667美元)。虽然西班牙裔患者的总支出最低(14,159美元,95% CI = 11,955- 16,363美元),但NHB和NHW患者的年度医疗保健总支出相似,分别为15,623美元(95% CI = 12,228- 19,015美元)和15,237美元(95% CI = 14,599- 15,876美元)。调整协变量后,西班牙裔和NHB患者比NHW患者花费分别少34% (95% CI = 24%-43%)和31% (95% CI = 22%-39%) (P P P = 0.0406)。在门诊就诊方面,调整协变量后,西班牙裔患者花费71% (95% CI = 59%-80%), NHB患者花费50% (95% CI = 34%-62%)(均P P = 0.007)。结论:在调整各种协变量后,西班牙裔和非西班牙裔美国人关节炎患者的医疗保健总支出明显低于非西班牙裔美国人关节炎患者。具体来说,西班牙裔和NHB患者的门诊和门诊费用较低。此外,西班牙裔患者的住院费用低于非西班牙裔患者。有必要进行进一步的研究,深入寻找这些支出差异的原因,例如行为和信仰体系,这些因素可能会限制少数种族和族裔群体对护理的使用。
{"title":"Examining racial and ethnic differences in health care expenditures among older adults with arthritis in the United States.","authors":"Samuel C Ofili, Paroma Arefin, Olajumoke A Olateju, Sujit S Sansgiry","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1075","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1075","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;More than 65 million Americans suffer from arthritis, which is the primary cause of disability in older adults. Arthritis is also a leading disease, with more than $600 billion in medical expenses each year. There is, however, little research on health care expenditure by race and ethnicity among older adults with arthritis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To examine the racial and ethnic differences in health care expenditures among older adults with arthritis in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A retrospective multiyear cross-sectional study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data (2018-2022) analyzed health care expenditures of adults aged 65 years and older with arthritis across different races and ethnicities. All-cause expenditures (total, office-based visits, hospital inpatient visits, prescription medicine, and outpatient visits) were compared between Hispanic patients, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients, and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, adjusting for covariates using SAS version 9.4.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The study analyzed 15,345 adults (weighted frequency = 29,915,198) with arthritis. The mean total annual health care expenditure was $15,052 (95% CI = $14,435-$15,667) for all adults with arthritis. Although Hispanic patients had the lowest total expenditure ($14,159, 95% CI = $11,955-$16,363), NHB and NHW patients had similar total annual health care expenditures at $15,623 (95% CI = $12,228-$19,015) and $15,237 (95% CI = $14,599-$15,876), respectively. After adjustment for covariates, Hispanic and NHB patients spent 34% (95% CI = 24%-43%) and 31% (95% CI = 22%-39%) less than NHW patients (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.0001). This was largely because of lower office-based expenditures, where both Hispanic and NHB patients spent approximately 52% (95% CI = 42%-60%, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.0001) less than NHW patients. Also, Hispanic patients incurred 23% (95% CI = 1%-41%) lower hospital inpatient expenditure (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;  =  0.0406) than NHW patients. For outpatient visits, Hispanic patients spent 71% (95% CI = 59%-80%) and NHB patients 50% (95% CI = 34%-62%) (both &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.0001) lower than NHW patients. Hispanic and NHB patients differed only in outpatient expenditures, where NHB patients significantly spent 75% more than Hispanic patients (95% CI = 16%-162%, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;  =  0.007) after adjusting for covariates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Total health care expenditures were substantially lower for Hispanic and NHB patients with arthritis compared with NHW patients after adjusting for various covariates. Specifically, Hispanics and NHB patients had lower office-based and outpatient expenditures. Additionally, Hispanic patients incurred lower hospital inpatient expenditures than NHW patients. There is a need for further studies delving into finding reasons for these differences in expenditures, such as behavioral and belief systems that may limit the use of care among racial a","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1075-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467764/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recommendations for use and coverage of digital, binocular treatments for amblyopia. 弱视数码双眼治疗的使用和覆盖建议。
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-a.s1
Brenda L Bohnsack, James Bowerman, K David Epley

Amblyopia is the most common cause of vision impairment in children and presents as reduced visual acuity caused by suppression of neurologic signals from an eye. Traditional treatments include penalizing the better-seeing eye by occlusion, most commonly with patching. This does not address the binocular vision deficits of amblyopia and leaves most patients with unresolved disease and permanent vision loss. Digital, dual-acting therapy (Luminopia, Luminopia, Inc) was cleared in October 2021 via US Food and Drug Administration de novo market authorization for the treatment of amblyopia associated with anisometropia and/or with mild strabismus in children aged 4-7 years. Binocular digital therapy is now included in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's amblyopia treatment guidelines, the Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP). The pivotal randomized, controlled phase 3 trial evaluating Luminopia was recognized in the PPP as Level I+ evidence. Pediatric ophthalmologists and national and regional health plan leaders formed a roundtable panel to evaluate disease impact, the current treatment landscape, and guideline-based treatment principles. At the conclusion of this discussion, the panel developed a unanimous recommendation for the appropriate clinical and value-driven use of Luminopia and payer coverage recommendations. Luminopia is recommended for use to treat amblyopia and should be covered by payer policies. Duration of therapy should be based on patient needs as determined by prescribing physician expertise. Luminopia may be covered under either medical or pharmacy benefit. Step-edits may be used, and documentation of inadequate response to other therapies may be necessary to obtain coverage. Clinical documentation and medical letters of exception may also be needed for off-label use of Luminopia. The recommendations achieved in this roundtable based on the clinical evidence available provide a justification for broad payer coverage and improved patient access to a full range of evidence-based amblyopia treatments.

弱视是儿童视力障碍最常见的原因,表现为眼睛神经信号抑制导致的视力下降。传统的治疗方法包括对视力较好的眼睛进行遮挡,最常见的是贴片。这并不能解决弱视的双目视力缺陷,并使大多数患者无法解决疾病和永久性视力丧失。数字双作用疗法(Luminopia, Luminopia, Inc)于2021年10月通过美国食品和药物管理局(fda)的新市场授权获得批准,用于治疗4-7岁儿童弱视伴参差和/或轻度斜视。双目数字治疗现在被纳入美国眼科学会的弱视治疗指南,弱视首选实践模式(PPP)。评估Luminopia的关键随机对照3期试验在PPP中被认为是I+级证据。儿童眼科医生和国家及地区卫生计划领导人组成了一个圆桌小组,评估疾病影响、当前治疗情况和基于指南的治疗原则。在讨论结束时,专家组就Luminopia的适当临床应用和价值驱动提出了一致建议,并提出了付款人覆盖建议。Luminopia被推荐用于治疗弱视,并且应该被支付人的政策所覆盖。治疗的持续时间应根据病人的需要,由开处方的医生的专业知识决定。致盲可能包括在医疗或药品福利范围内。可能会使用分步编辑,并且可能需要记录对其他疗法反应不足的情况以获得覆盖。临床文件和医疗例外信也可能需要在标签外使用Luminopia。本次圆桌会议根据现有临床证据提出的建议为扩大付款人覆盖范围和改善患者获得全方位循证弱视治疗提供了理由。
{"title":"Recommendations for use and coverage of digital, binocular treatments for amblyopia.","authors":"Brenda L Bohnsack, James Bowerman, K David Epley","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-a.s1","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-a.s1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amblyopia is the most common cause of vision impairment in children and presents as reduced visual acuity caused by suppression of neurologic signals from an eye. Traditional treatments include penalizing the better-seeing eye by occlusion, most commonly with patching. This does not address the binocular vision deficits of amblyopia and leaves most patients with unresolved disease and permanent vision loss. Digital, dual-acting therapy (Luminopia, Luminopia, Inc) was cleared in October 2021 via US Food and Drug Administration de novo market authorization for the treatment of amblyopia associated with anisometropia and/or with mild strabismus in children aged 4-7 years. Binocular digital therapy is now included in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's amblyopia treatment guidelines, the Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP). The pivotal randomized, controlled phase 3 trial evaluating Luminopia was recognized in the PPP as Level I+ evidence. Pediatric ophthalmologists and national and regional health plan leaders formed a roundtable panel to evaluate disease impact, the current treatment landscape, and guideline-based treatment principles. At the conclusion of this discussion, the panel developed a unanimous recommendation for the appropriate clinical and value-driven use of Luminopia and payer coverage recommendations. Luminopia is recommended for use to treat amblyopia and should be covered by payer policies. Duration of therapy should be based on patient needs as determined by prescribing physician expertise. Luminopia may be covered under either medical or pharmacy benefit. Step-edits may be used, and documentation of inadequate response to other therapies may be necessary to obtain coverage. Clinical documentation and medical letters of exception may also be needed for off-label use of Luminopia. The recommendations achieved in this roundtable based on the clinical evidence available provide a justification for broad payer coverage and improved patient access to a full range of evidence-based amblyopia treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10-a Suppl","pages":"S1-S10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467751/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Poster Abstracts - NEXUS 2025. 海报摘要- NEXUS 2025。
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-d.s1

The AMCP Poster Abstract Program provides a forum for authors to share their research with the managed care pharmacy community. Authors submit their abstracts to AMCP, and each abstract is reviewed by a team of peer reviewers and editors. All accepted abstracts are presented as posters at AMCP's Annual and Nexus meetings. These abstracts are also available through the AMCP meeting app. This JMCP supplement publishes all abstracts that were peer reviewed and accepted for presentation at AMCP Nexus 2025. Abstracts submitted in the Student and Encore categories did not undergo peer review; therefore, these abstracts are not included in the supplement.

AMCP海报摘要计划为作者提供了一个论坛,与管理护理药房社区分享他们的研究。作者将他们的摘要提交给AMCP,每个摘要由同行审稿人和编辑团队进行审查。所有被接受的摘要将作为海报在AMCP年会和Nexus会议上展示。这些摘要也可以通过AMCP会议应用程序获得。这份JMCP增刊发布了所有经过同行评审并被接受在AMCP Nexus 2025上发表的摘要。学生类和返场类提交的摘要没有经过同行评审;因此,这些摘要不包括在增刊中。
{"title":"Poster Abstracts - NEXUS 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-d.s1","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-d.s1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The AMCP Poster Abstract Program provides a forum for authors to share their research with the managed care pharmacy community. Authors submit their abstracts to AMCP, and each abstract is reviewed by a team of peer reviewers and editors. All accepted abstracts are presented as posters at AMCP's Annual and Nexus meetings. These abstracts are also available through the AMCP meeting app. This JMCP supplement publishes all abstracts that were peer reviewed and accepted for presentation at AMCP Nexus 2025. Abstracts submitted in the Student and Encore categories did not undergo peer review; therefore, these abstracts are not included in the supplement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10-d Suppl","pages":"S1-S152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560628/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145345520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AMCP Market Insights: Navigating the rapidly changing landscape of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. AMCP市场洞察:引导快速变化的ER+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-b.s1
Bridget Flavin, Denise Wolff, Laura Bobolts, Gaurang Gandhi, Ryan Haumschild, Neil Iyengar, Michael Kobernick, Rebecca Lich, Bhavesh Shah

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women in the United States, and its impact on both patients and their caregivers, particularly in advanced or metastatic disease, is substantial. Additionally, for the most common breast cancer subtype (estrogen receptor [ER]+/human endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-), the treatment landscape for metastatic disease is continuously evolving, making appropriate therapy sequencing challenging. To discuss navigating the rapidly changing landscape of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), AMCP Market Insights virtually convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in February 2025. Key insights from the discussion on ER+/HER2- mBC included addressing the patient care journey, maintaining high-quality care, managing the impact to payers, evaluating new and emerging therapies, and looking toward the future. Suggested payer best practices in ER+/HER2- mBC also emerged from the discussion.

乳腺癌是美国女性中最常见的癌症,它对患者及其护理人员的影响是巨大的,特别是在晚期或转移性疾病中。此外,对于最常见的乳腺癌亚型(雌激素受体[ER]+/人内皮生长因子受体2 [HER2]-),转移性疾病的治疗前景不断发展,使适当的治疗测序具有挑战性。为了讨论如何应对快速变化的ER+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌(mBC), AMCP Market Insights于2025年2月召集了一个管理式医疗利益相关者专家小组。关于ER+/HER2- mBC的讨论的主要见解包括解决患者护理过程,保持高质量的护理,管理对支付者的影响,评估新的和新兴的治疗方法,以及展望未来。讨论中还提出了ER+/HER2- mBC的建议付款人最佳做法。
{"title":"AMCP Market Insights: Navigating the rapidly changing landscape of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.","authors":"Bridget Flavin, Denise Wolff, Laura Bobolts, Gaurang Gandhi, Ryan Haumschild, Neil Iyengar, Michael Kobernick, Rebecca Lich, Bhavesh Shah","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-b.s1","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-b.s1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women in the United States, and its impact on both patients and their caregivers, particularly in advanced or metastatic disease, is substantial. Additionally, for the most common breast cancer subtype (estrogen receptor [ER]+/human endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-), the treatment landscape for metastatic disease is continuously evolving, making appropriate therapy sequencing challenging. To discuss navigating the rapidly changing landscape of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), AMCP Market Insights virtually convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in February 2025. Key insights from the discussion on ER+/HER2- mBC included addressing the patient care journey, maintaining high-quality care, managing the impact to payers, evaluating new and emerging therapies, and looking toward the future. Suggested payer best practices in ER+/HER2- mBC also emerged from the discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10-b Suppl","pages":"S1-S14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing maribavir management: The role of health system specialty pharmacies in access, monitoring, and waste reduction. 优化马里巴韦管理:卫生系统专业药房在获取、监测和减少浪费方面的作用。
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.997
Dustin R Donald, Autumn D Zuckerman, Kevin Dee, Nicolas Gargurevich, Leena Choi, Strong Oboh, Chelsea P Renfro

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication in transplant recipients, with refractory or resistant infections making up a subset of this population. Maribavir, indicated for CMV infection that is refractory to first-line treatments, is a high-cost, limited-distribution specialty medication that requires frequent laboratory monitoring to assess efficacy.

Objective: To evaluate outcomes of health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) management of maribavir including waste and cost avoidance, medication access, and pharmacist interventions during treatment.

Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of patients prescribed maribavir from April 1, 2022, to August 1, 2024. Included patients were prescribed maribavir for posttransplant CMV infection/disease that was refractory to treatment with ganciclovir, valganciclovir, cidofovir, or foscarnet. Outcomes included the number of dispenses that were reduced by pharmacist interventions that led to medication waste avoidance and the cost avoidance of these interventions, time to medication access, and the number of pharmacist interventions recommending laboratory tests or medication discontinuation during treatment. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. To estimate costs avoided by pharmacy and payer, cost avoidance was calculated by multiplying the 14-day supply of maribavir that was not dispensed during the final treatment course because of pharmacist intervention by the average wholesale price (AWP), AWP minus 20% (AWP-20%), and wholesale acquisition cost (WAC).

Results: Included patients (N = 33) were predominately male (64%) with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 50-66 years). Five patients were required to repeat treatment with maribavir multiple times because of CMV reactivation totaling 41 unique instances of maribavir use. The most common transplant type was kidney (n = 11), and all patients were donor CMV positive (n = 33). 29 patients were able to fill with the institution's HSSP with 36 instances of maribavir use and 113 fills of maribavir. Of these 36 instances, 12 (33%) had the final dispense of the treatment course reduced because of pharmacist intervention, amounting to a cost avoidance range of $143,421 (AWP-20%) to $179,276 (AWP). Maribavir insurance prior approval (PA) was required for 31 (76%) instances of medication use, with median PAs occurring the same day as referral (IQR = 0-2). Of the 41 instances of maribavir use, 8 (20%) required an intervention from the pharmacist recommending CMV laboratory testing be completed.

Conclusions: Pharmacists successfully obtained timely insurance PAs for maribavir. During treatment, pharmacists reduced unnecessary fills, resulting in large cost and waste avoidance. Future research is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of interventions by specialty pharmac

背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染是移植受者常见的并发症,难治性或耐药性感染构成了这一人群的一部分。马里巴韦适用于一线治疗难治性巨细胞病毒感染,是一种高成本、有限分布的特殊药物,需要经常进行实验室监测以评估疗效。目的:评价卫生系统专业药房(HSSP)管理马里巴韦的结果,包括避免浪费和成本、药物可及性和治疗期间药师干预。方法:本研究采用单中心、回顾性队列分析,对2022年4月1日至2024年8月1日服用马里巴韦的患者进行分析。纳入的患者在移植后CMV感染/疾病对更昔洛韦、缬更昔洛韦、西多福韦或氟膦酸钠治疗难治性时开马里巴韦。结果包括通过药剂师干预减少的配药次数,从而避免了药物浪费,避免了这些干预的成本,获得药物的时间,以及建议在治疗期间进行实验室检查或停药的药剂师干预次数。采用描述性统计进行分析。为了估计药房和付款人避免的成本,通过将最终治疗过程中由于药剂师干预而未分配的14天马里巴韦供应量乘以平均批发价格(AWP), AWP-20% (AWP-20%)和批发获取成本(WAC)来计算成本避免。结果:纳入的患者(N = 33)以男性为主(64%),中位年龄62岁(四分位数间距[IQR] = 50-66岁)。由于CMV再激活,5例患者需要多次重复使用马里巴韦治疗,总共41例使用马里巴韦的独特实例。最常见的移植类型是肾脏(n = 11),所有患者均为供体CMV阳性(n = 33)。29名患者能够填满该机构的HSSP,其中36例使用了马里巴韦,113例使用了马里巴韦。在这36例病例中,有12例(33%)由于药剂师的干预而减少了疗程的最终分配,总计成本避免范围为143,421美元(AWP-20%)至179,276美元(AWP)。31例(76%)用药病例需要事先批准马里巴韦保险(PA),中位数PA发生在转诊当天(IQR = 0-2)。在41例使用马里巴韦的病例中,8例(20%)需要药剂师建议完成CMV实验室检测的干预措施。结论:药师成功地及时获得了马里巴韦的保险PAs。在治疗过程中,药剂师减少了不必要的填充,从而避免了大量的成本和浪费。未来的研究需要评估专业药剂师干预对马里巴韦患者预后的长期影响。
{"title":"Optimizing maribavir management: The role of health system specialty pharmacies in access, monitoring, and waste reduction.","authors":"Dustin R Donald, Autumn D Zuckerman, Kevin Dee, Nicolas Gargurevich, Leena Choi, Strong Oboh, Chelsea P Renfro","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.997","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication in transplant recipients, with refractory or resistant infections making up a subset of this population. Maribavir, indicated for CMV infection that is refractory to first-line treatments, is a high-cost, limited-distribution specialty medication that requires frequent laboratory monitoring to assess efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate outcomes of health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) management of maribavir including waste and cost avoidance, medication access, and pharmacist interventions during treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of patients prescribed maribavir from April 1, 2022, to August 1, 2024. Included patients were prescribed maribavir for posttransplant CMV infection/disease that was refractory to treatment with ganciclovir, valganciclovir, cidofovir, or foscarnet. Outcomes included the number of dispenses that were reduced by pharmacist interventions that led to medication waste avoidance and the cost avoidance of these interventions, time to medication access, and the number of pharmacist interventions recommending laboratory tests or medication discontinuation during treatment. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. To estimate costs avoided by pharmacy and payer, cost avoidance was calculated by multiplying the 14-day supply of maribavir that was not dispensed during the final treatment course because of pharmacist intervention by the average wholesale price (AWP), AWP minus 20% (AWP-20%), and wholesale acquisition cost (WAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included patients (N = 33) were predominately male (64%) with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 50-66 years). Five patients were required to repeat treatment with maribavir multiple times because of CMV reactivation totaling 41 unique instances of maribavir use. The most common transplant type was kidney (n = 11), and all patients were donor CMV positive (n = 33). 29 patients were able to fill with the institution's HSSP with 36 instances of maribavir use and 113 fills of maribavir. Of these 36 instances, 12 (33%) had the final dispense of the treatment course reduced because of pharmacist intervention, amounting to a cost avoidance range of $143,421 (AWP-20%) to $179,276 (AWP). Maribavir insurance prior approval (PA) was required for 31 (76%) instances of medication use, with median PAs occurring the same day as referral (IQR = 0-2). Of the 41 instances of maribavir use, 8 (20%) required an intervention from the pharmacist recommending CMV laboratory testing be completed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacists successfully obtained timely insurance PAs for maribavir. During treatment, pharmacists reduced unnecessary fills, resulting in large cost and waste avoidance. Future research is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of interventions by specialty pharmac","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"997-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467757/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AMCP Market Insights: Managed care approaches to bispecific antibodies with a focus on follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. AMCP市场洞察:管理护理方法双特异性抗体,重点是滤泡性淋巴瘤和弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤。
IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-c.s1
Bridget Flavin, Denise Wolff, Laura R Bobolts, Tara Graff, Kirollos Hanna, Ryan Haumschild, Timothy Mok, Bhavesh Shah

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are an emerging treatment modality particularly in hematologic malignancies such as the non-Hodgkin lymphomas follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although bsAbs offer opportunities in the treatment of these conditions, they also present challenges, and additional longer-term data are needed to determine their optimal role. To discuss managed care approaches to bsAbs with a focus on FL and DLBCL, AMCP Market Insights virtually convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in April 2025. Key insights from the discussion included that clinical efficacy is a primary consideration when evaluating the role of bsAbs in FL and DLBCL and that ongoing data collection is necessary for increased certainty in long-term outcomes, treatment comparisons, and real-world experience. Other insights related to treatment choice, site-of-care considerations, the evolving place of bsAbs in FL and DLBCL therapy, economic factors, and social determinants of health and equity. Suggested payer best practices for bsAbs in FL and DLBCL also emerged from the discussion.

双特异性抗体(bsAbs)是一种新兴的治疗方式,特别是在血液系统恶性肿瘤,如非霍奇金淋巴瘤滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)和弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)。虽然bsab为治疗这些疾病提供了机会,但也带来了挑战,需要更多的长期数据来确定其最佳作用。为了讨论以FL和DLBCL为重点的管理式医疗方法,AMCP Market Insights于2025年4月召集了一个管理式医疗利益相关者专家小组。讨论的主要见解包括,在评估bsab在FL和DLBCL中的作用时,临床疗效是首要考虑因素,持续的数据收集对于增加长期结果、治疗比较和实际经验的确定性是必要的。其他见解涉及治疗选择、护理地点考虑、bsab在FL和DLBCL治疗中的地位演变、经济因素以及健康和公平的社会决定因素。在FL和DLBCL中,建议的付款人最佳做法也出现在讨论中。
{"title":"AMCP Market Insights: Managed care approaches to bispecific antibodies with a focus on follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.","authors":"Bridget Flavin, Denise Wolff, Laura R Bobolts, Tara Graff, Kirollos Hanna, Ryan Haumschild, Timothy Mok, Bhavesh Shah","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-c.s1","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10-c.s1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are an emerging treatment modality particularly in hematologic malignancies such as the non-Hodgkin lymphomas follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although bsAbs offer opportunities in the treatment of these conditions, they also present challenges, and additional longer-term data are needed to determine their optimal role. To discuss managed care approaches to bsAbs with a focus on FL and DLBCL, AMCP Market Insights virtually convened an expert panel of managed care stakeholders in April 2025. Key insights from the discussion included that clinical efficacy is a primary consideration when evaluating the role of bsAbs in FL and DLBCL and that ongoing data collection is necessary for increased certainty in long-term outcomes, treatment comparisons, and real-world experience. Other insights related to treatment choice, site-of-care considerations, the evolving place of bsAbs in FL and DLBCL therapy, economic factors, and social determinants of health and equity. Suggested payer best practices for bsAbs in FL and DLBCL also emerged from the discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10-c Suppl","pages":"S1-S10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467760/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145149416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1