Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1160
Xiaodan Mai, Aaron B Mendelsohn, James Marshall, Nancy D Lin, Cara L McDermott, Jenice S Ko, Pamala A Pawloski, Aziza Jamal-Allial, Kimberly Daniels, Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven, Djeneba Audrey Djibo, Catherine M Lockhart
Background: Trastuzumab is an antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 monoclonal antibody used to treat breast and other cancers. Trastuzumab biosimilars were approved in the United States beginning in 2017. Utilization information on these biosimilars is limited.
Objective: To examine utilization patterns and characteristics of patients treated with trastuzumab (biosimilars and reference) and other human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 products.
Methods: We evaluated health care claims data from the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium distributed research network, representing a large, geographically diverse US population of commercially insured individuals. We queried 4 distributed research network health plan partners to capture product usage data and patient information from October 1, 2016, to October 31, 2022. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled in their health plan for at least 365 days before their first observed trastuzumab utilization date in this study period. Data were aggregated across data partners.
Results: More than 16 million eligible health plan members representing more than 31 million person-years of data were evaluated. We identified 5,984 incident treatment episodes; 3,878 (64.8%) episodes were with the reference trastuzumab. The mean ages were consistent across trastuzumab products (60.2 to 65.1 years) and at least 80% of the episodes were among female patients. The mean comorbidity index score was 1.2 (SD = 1.9) among users of the reference vs the biosimilars (range 1.2-2.5). Other clinical characteristics (eg, diabetes, hypertension) were comparable across products. The proportion of total incident episodes of the reference trastuzumab decreased substantially over time (96% in 2016 vs 28% in 2021) as utilization of the biosimilars increased (eg, use of trastuzumab-anns increased from 2% [2019] to 36% [2021]). Similar utilization trends were seen among patients with and without metastatic breast cancer.
Conclusions: Trastuzumab biosimilars utilization has grown since their introduction to the US market. Exploration of these biosimilars' comparative effectiveness and safety to their reference product is warranted.
{"title":"Utilization and patient characteristics for the trastuzumab reference and biosimilars, and other human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitors in the United States.","authors":"Xiaodan Mai, Aaron B Mendelsohn, James Marshall, Nancy D Lin, Cara L McDermott, Jenice S Ko, Pamala A Pawloski, Aziza Jamal-Allial, Kimberly Daniels, Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven, Djeneba Audrey Djibo, Catherine M Lockhart","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1160","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trastuzumab is an antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 monoclonal antibody used to treat breast and other cancers. Trastuzumab biosimilars were approved in the United States beginning in 2017. Utilization information on these biosimilars is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine utilization patterns and characteristics of patients treated with trastuzumab (biosimilars and reference) and other human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated health care claims data from the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium distributed research network, representing a large, geographically diverse US population of commercially insured individuals. We queried 4 distributed research network health plan partners to capture product usage data and patient information from October 1, 2016, to October 31, 2022. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled in their health plan for at least 365 days before their first observed trastuzumab utilization date in this study period. Data were aggregated across data partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than 16 million eligible health plan members representing more than 31 million person-years of data were evaluated. We identified 5,984 incident treatment episodes; 3,878 (64.8%) episodes were with the reference trastuzumab. The mean ages were consistent across trastuzumab products (60.2 to 65.1 years) and at least 80% of the episodes were among female patients. The mean comorbidity index score was 1.2 (SD = 1.9) among users of the reference vs the biosimilars (range 1.2-2.5). Other clinical characteristics (eg, diabetes, hypertension) were comparable across products. The proportion of total incident episodes of the reference trastuzumab decreased substantially over time (96% in 2016 vs 28% in 2021) as utilization of the biosimilars increased (eg, use of trastuzumab-anns increased from 2% [2019] to 36% [2021]). Similar utilization trends were seen among patients with and without metastatic breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trastuzumab biosimilars utilization has grown since their introduction to the US market. Exploration of these biosimilars' comparative effectiveness and safety to their reference product is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424920/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s2
Irl B Hirsch, Christopher G Parkin
{"title":"Innovation is the driver behind quality improvements in diabetes care delivery.","authors":"Irl B Hirsch, Christopher G Parkin","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1078
Dominique Seo, John G Rizk, T Joseph Mattingly Ii, Eberechukwu Onukwugha
Background: Because of concerns of cost-effectiveness and low utilization, in 2018, manufacturers initiated a 60% price reduction for PCSK9 inhibitors, reducing the list price from more than $14,000 to $5,850. The goal of the reduction was to increase access and lower patient cost sharing for PCSK9 inhibitors.
Objective: To determine whether list price reductions resulted in a statistically significant decrease in patient cost sharing for PCSK9 inhibitors. The secondary objective is to quantify the change in monthly out-of-pocket (OOP) cost in the years following the price reduction policies.
Methods: This analysis uses a cross-sectional quasi-experimental design, with 2 time periods, to estimate the change in monthly OOP cost. A 2-stage cost model was used to quantify the difference in mean monthly OOP cost between the preprice and postprice reduction periods. This analysis was completed using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics health plan claims for PSCK9 inhibitors between January 2016 and December 2021 for commercially insured individuals in the United States. The primary exposure of interest is a manufacturer-initiated list price reduction in October 2018. The primary outcome of interest is the difference in the predicted monthly OOP cost between the prereduction and postreduction periods.
Results: There was a 50% decrease in the predicted monthly OOP cost, from $235.22 (SD = $241) in the prereduction period to $116.75 (SD = $152) in the postreduction period.
Conclusions: This claims level analysis used robust statistical modeling techniques to quantify the effect of manufacturer-initiated price reductions on monthly OOP cost. This unique manufacturer decision resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the monthly OOP cost for beneficiaries using PCSK9 inhibitors. Manufacturer-initiated price reductions could be a strategy to reduce the cost for other therapies with access and cost concerns. Further research is needed on the downstream patient-level effects of cost reductions, particularly among individuals who experience multiple barriers to care.
{"title":"Impact of manufacturer-initiated list price reduction on patient out-of-pocket costs for <i>PCSK9</i> inhibitors.","authors":"Dominique Seo, John G Rizk, T Joseph Mattingly Ii, Eberechukwu Onukwugha","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because of concerns of cost-effectiveness and low utilization, in 2018, manufacturers initiated a 60% price reduction for <i>PCSK9</i> inhibitors, reducing the list price from more than $14,000 to $5,850. The goal of the reduction was to increase access and lower patient cost sharing for <i>PCSK9</i> inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether list price reductions resulted in a statistically significant decrease in patient cost sharing for <i>PCSK9</i> inhibitors. The secondary objective is to quantify the change in monthly out-of-pocket (OOP) cost in the years following the price reduction policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis uses a cross-sectional quasi-experimental design, with 2 time periods, to estimate the change in monthly OOP cost. A 2-stage cost model was used to quantify the difference in mean monthly OOP cost between the preprice and postprice reduction periods. This analysis was completed using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics health plan claims for <i>PSCK9</i> inhibitors between January 2016 and December 2021 for commercially insured individuals in the United States. The primary exposure of interest is a manufacturer-initiated list price reduction in October 2018. The primary outcome of interest is the difference in the predicted monthly OOP cost between the prereduction and postreduction periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a 50% decrease in the predicted monthly OOP cost, from $235.22 (SD = $241) in the prereduction period to $116.75 (SD = $152) in the postreduction period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This claims level analysis used robust statistical modeling techniques to quantify the effect of manufacturer-initiated price reductions on monthly OOP cost. This unique manufacturer decision resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the monthly OOP cost for beneficiaries using <i>PCSK9</i> inhibitors. Manufacturer-initiated price reductions could be a strategy to reduce the cost for other therapies with access and cost concerns. Further research is needed on the downstream patient-level effects of cost reductions, particularly among individuals who experience multiple barriers to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424918/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-06-17DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.23292
Joseph E Biskupiak, Daniel L Carlow, Medha N Munshi
Background: A tubeless, disposable insulin pump (Omnipod DASH Insulin Management System, Insulet Corporation) has demonstrated improved glycemic outcomes for people with diabetes who require insulin. The impact of the system on downstream health care events has not been studied.
Objective: To assess health care resource utilization for a Medicare population before and after starting tubeless, disposable insulin pump therapy.
Methods: This retrospective, observational analysis used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 100% Research Identifiable Files. Study outcomes included change in event rates for diabetes-related emergency department (DRED) visits, all-cause emergency department (ACED) visits, diabetes-related inpatient (DRIP) admissions, and all-cause inpatient (ACIP) admissions among Medicare beneficiaries who started the tubeless, disposable insulin pump in 2020 (postpump observation period) as compared with the same duration and calendar period in 2019 (prepump observation period) with no pump use. Subgroup analyses were performed based on Medicare entitlement reason, diabetes type, and diagnosis status for depressive disorder.
Results: A total of 811 users met the criteria for analysis: 46.2% had type 2 diabetes, a majority (59.2%) were aged 65 years or older, and 37.0% had a diagnosis for depressive disorder. Significant reductions were observed for DRED of -46.9% (95% CI = -63% to -23%); ACED of -29.0% (95% CI = -37% to -20%); ACIP of -19.9% (95% CI = -32% to -6%). DRIP rates declined notably (-36.6%; 95% CI = -61% to 4%). Event rates observed across subgroups demonstrated consistent downward trends; however, not all were statistically significant.
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that use of the tubeless, disposable insulin pump was associated with reductions in DRED, ACED, and ACIP. Our results provide real-world evidence to support the use of the tubeless, disposable insulin pump among Medicare beneficiaries who require insulin, regardless of diabetes type or Medicare entitlement reason. Additional studies are recommended to further evaluate the effect of insulin pumps on health care utilization among the Medicare population and other insurance populations.
背景:一种无管、一次性胰岛素泵(Omnipod DASH Insulin Management System,Insulet 公司)已证明可改善需要胰岛素的糖尿病患者的血糖结果。目前尚未研究该系统对下游医疗事件的影响:评估医疗保险人群在开始使用无管、一次性胰岛素泵治疗前后的医疗资源利用情况:这项回顾性观察分析使用了美国医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心 100% 研究可识别档案中的数据。研究结果包括 2020 年(泵后观察期)开始使用无管一次性胰岛素泵的医疗保险受益人与 2019 年(泵前观察期)未使用胰岛素泵的相同时间段和日历期相比,糖尿病相关急诊(DRED)就诊率、全因急诊(ACED)就诊率、糖尿病相关住院(DRIP)入院率和全因住院(ACIP)入院率的变化情况。根据享受医疗保险的原因、糖尿病类型和抑郁症诊断情况进行了分组分析:共有 811 名用户符合分析标准:46.2% 患有 2 型糖尿病,大多数(59.2%)年龄在 65 岁或以上,37.0% 被诊断患有抑郁症。结果显示,DRED显著降低了-46.9%(95% CI = -63%至-23%);ACED显著降低了-29.0%(95% CI = -37%至-20%);ACIP显著降低了-19.9%(95% CI = -32%至-6%)。DRIP率显著下降(-36.6%;95% CI = -61%至4%)。在各分组中观察到的事件发生率呈现出一致的下降趋势;但并非所有事件发生率都具有显著的统计学意义:这些研究结果表明,使用无管、一次性胰岛素泵与减少 DRED、ACED 和 ACIP 有关。我们的研究结果提供了现实世界的证据,支持在需要胰岛素的医疗保险受益人中使用无管、一次性胰岛素泵,无论糖尿病类型或医疗保险待遇原因如何。建议开展更多研究,以进一步评估胰岛素泵对医疗保险人群和其他保险人群使用医疗服务的影响。
{"title":"Impact of a tubeless, disposable insulin pump on emergency department visits and inpatient admissions among a Medicare population.","authors":"Joseph E Biskupiak, Daniel L Carlow, Medha N Munshi","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.23292","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.23292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A tubeless, disposable insulin pump (Omnipod DASH Insulin Management System, Insulet Corporation) has demonstrated improved glycemic outcomes for people with diabetes who require insulin. The impact of the system on downstream health care events has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess health care resource utilization for a Medicare population before and after starting tubeless, disposable insulin pump therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational analysis used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 100% Research Identifiable Files. Study outcomes included change in event rates for diabetes-related emergency department (DRED) visits, all-cause emergency department (ACED) visits, diabetes-related inpatient (DRIP) admissions, and all-cause inpatient (ACIP) admissions among Medicare beneficiaries who started the tubeless, disposable insulin pump in 2020 (postpump observation period) as compared with the same duration and calendar period in 2019 (prepump observation period) with no pump use. Subgroup analyses were performed based on Medicare entitlement reason, diabetes type, and diagnosis status for depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 811 users met the criteria for analysis: 46.2% had type 2 diabetes, a majority (59.2%) were aged 65 years or older, and 37.0% had a diagnosis for depressive disorder. Significant reductions were observed for DRED of -46.9% (95% CI = -63% to -23%); ACED of -29.0% (95% CI = -37% to -20%); ACIP of -19.9% (95% CI = -32% to -6%). DRIP rates declined notably (-36.6%; 95% CI = -61% to 4%). Event rates observed across subgroups demonstrated consistent downward trends; however, not all were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that use of the tubeless, disposable insulin pump was associated with reductions in DRED, ACED, and ACIP. Our results provide real-world evidence to support the use of the tubeless, disposable insulin pump among Medicare beneficiaries who require insulin, regardless of diabetes type or Medicare entitlement reason. Additional studies are recommended to further evaluate the effect of insulin pumps on health care utilization among the Medicare population and other insurance populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424916/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141331090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s30
Marissa Morris-Murray, Marie Frazzitta
Value-based diabetes care is a proactive approach to providing quality care to individuals with diabetes. This approach focuses on improving clinical outcomes rather than the volume of services provided. Implementation of value-based diabetes care requires an established set of standardized quality measures against which all stakeholders can assess and benchmark their performance. The National Committee for Quality Assurance recently added the Glucose Management Indicator to its Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. The Glucose Management Indicator can be used as a measure of glucose control. This article discusses the benefits of value-based care, the importance of diabetes quality measures, and how the rapidly increasing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring is impacting these measures while improving the lives of individuals with diabetes.
{"title":"Using continuous glucose monitoring to measure and improve quality metrics: Updates on the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set 2024 Glucose Management Indicator measure.","authors":"Marissa Morris-Murray, Marie Frazzitta","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s30","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Value-based diabetes care is a proactive approach to providing quality care to individuals with diabetes. This approach focuses on improving clinical outcomes rather than the volume of services provided. Implementation of value-based diabetes care requires an established set of standardized quality measures against which all stakeholders can assess and benchmark their performance. The National Committee for Quality Assurance recently added the Glucose Management Indicator to its Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. The Glucose Management Indicator can be used as a measure of glucose control. This article discusses the benefits of value-based care, the importance of diabetes quality measures, and how the rapidly increasing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring is impacting these measures while improving the lives of individuals with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1191
Dmitriy Nikitin, Reem A Mustafa, Brett McQueen, Antal Zemplenyi, Michael J DiStefano, Emily Nhan, Yasmine Kayali, Marina Richardson, David M Rind, Steven D Pearson, Foluso Agboola
{"title":"The effectiveness and value of midomafetamine-assisted psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder.","authors":"Dmitriy Nikitin, Reem A Mustafa, Brett McQueen, Antal Zemplenyi, Michael J DiStefano, Emily Nhan, Yasmine Kayali, Marina Richardson, David M Rind, Steven D Pearson, Foluso Agboola","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1191","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: With the rising costs for knee arthroplasty, therapies that allow patients to avoid or delay surgery following knee osteoarthritis (KOA) may help in reducing overall health care costs. Multiple intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) products are available on the market, varying by formulation, molecular weight, and number of injections, but clinical and economic benefits may differ by product. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the all-cause and KOA-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among newly diagnosed patients with KOA treated with multi-injection HA.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a large commercial claims database (Merative MarketScan database) to identify patients with KOA treated with high molecular weight (HMW) (n = 11,200), medium molecular weight (MMW) (n = 10,225), or low molecular weight (LMW) HAs (n = 8,473) between 2016 and 2019. KOA-related and all-cause HCRU and costs were compared within 12 months after the index HA treatment date. The association between outcomes and HA treatments was evaluated using a doubly robust method to adjust for confounding factors. HCRU and costs among the propensity score-weighted HA groups were compared using generalized linear models.
Results: HMW HA patients were found to have lower adjusted KOA-related medical costs by $265.37 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy costs by $19.90 (P < 0.001) compared with LMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause total medical costs by $130.42 (P = 0.013) and pharmacy costs by $63.33 (P < 0.001). HMW HA patients also had a lower adjusted KOA-related medical cost by $205.74 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy cost by $14.39 (P < 0.001) compared with MMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause medical by $1,195.66 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy by $196.99 (P < 0.001). Three-injection treatment patients (HMW HA, 84%; MMW HA, 82%) had high completion rate, compared with the 5-injection treatment cohort (LMW HA, 48%).
Conclusions: HMW HA patients had statistically significantly lower adjusted all-cause and KOA-related medical and pharmacy costs at 1 year follow-up compared with MMW HA and LMW HA patients. It is unclear if this is related to differences in molecular weight or specific mechanism of actions.
背景:随着膝关节置换术费用的不断上涨,让患者避免或推迟膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)手术的疗法可能有助于降低总体医疗费用。市场上有多种关节内透明质酸(HA)产品,其配方、分子量和注射次数各不相同,但不同产品的临床和经济效益可能不同。目的评估接受多次注射 HA 治疗的新诊断 KOA 患者的全因和 KOA 相关医疗资源利用率(HCRU)和成本:使用大型商业索赔数据库(Merative MarketScan数据库)进行回顾性队列研究,以确定2016年至2019年期间接受高分子量(HMW)(n = 11,200)、中分子量(MMW)(n = 10,225)或低分子量(LMW)HAs治疗的KOA患者(n = 8,473)。对指数HA治疗日期后12个月内的KOA相关和全因HCRU及成本进行了比较。采用双重稳健法评估了结果与HA治疗之间的关联,以调整混杂因素。使用广义线性模型比较了倾向得分加权的HA组的HCRU和费用:与 LMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者的调整后 KOA 相关医疗费用降低 265.37 美元(P < 0.001),药费降低 19.90 美元(P < 0.001),全因总医疗费用降低 130.42 美元(P = 0.013),药费降低 63.33 美元(P < 0.001)。与 MMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者的调整后 KOA 相关医疗费用降低了 205.74 美元(P < 0.001),药费降低了 14.39 美元(P < 0.001),全因医疗费用降低了 1,195.66 美元(P < 0.001),药费降低了 196.99 美元(P < 0.001)。与5次注射治疗队列(LMW HA,48%)相比,3次注射治疗患者(HMW HA,84%;MMW HA,82%)的治疗完成率较高:结论:与 MMW HA 和 LMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者在随访 1 年后的调整后全因和 KOA 相关医疗和药费明显较低。目前还不清楚这是否与分子量或特定作用机制的差异有关。
{"title":"A retrospective claims data analysis of health care utilization and cost among patients receiving multi-injection intraarticular hyaluronic acid.","authors":"Mathew Nicholls, Kaiwen Guo, Yen-Hua Chen, Ying Shen, Yutong Chang, Amy Guo","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rising costs for knee arthroplasty, therapies that allow patients to avoid or delay surgery following knee osteoarthritis (KOA) may help in reducing overall health care costs. Multiple intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) products are available on the market, varying by formulation, molecular weight, and number of injections, but clinical and economic benefits may differ by product. <b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To evaluate the all-cause and KOA-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among newly diagnosed patients with KOA treated with multi-injection HA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using a large commercial claims database (Merative MarketScan database) to identify patients with KOA treated with high molecular weight (HMW) (n = 11,200), medium molecular weight (MMW) (n = 10,225), or low molecular weight (LMW) HAs (n = 8,473) between 2016 and 2019. KOA-related and all-cause HCRU and costs were compared within 12 months after the index HA treatment date. The association between outcomes and HA treatments was evaluated using a doubly robust method to adjust for confounding factors. HCRU and costs among the propensity score-weighted HA groups were compared using generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HMW HA patients were found to have lower adjusted KOA-related medical costs by $265.37 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and pharmacy costs by $19.90 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with LMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause total medical costs by $130.42 (<i>P</i> = 0.013) and pharmacy costs by $63.33 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). HMW HA patients also had a lower adjusted KOA-related medical cost by $205.74 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and pharmacy cost by $14.39 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with MMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause medical by $1,195.66 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and pharmacy by $196.99 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Three-injection treatment patients (HMW HA, 84%; MMW HA, 82%) had high completion rate, compared with the 5-injection treatment cohort (LMW HA, 48%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HMW HA patients had statistically significantly lower adjusted all-cause and KOA-related medical and pharmacy costs at 1 year follow-up compared with MMW HA and LMW HA patients. It is unclear if this is related to differences in molecular weight or specific mechanism of actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424917/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s40
Cynthia A King, Amber N Lilly
Numerous studies have demonstrated that use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) significantly improves overall glycemic control and reduces the frequency and severity of hypoglycemic events in individuals treated with intensive insulin, nonintensive insulin, and noninsulin therapies, with reductions in both all-cause and diabetes-related health care resource utilization and lower costs. However, implementation of CGM including prescribing and assessment of the ambulatory glucose profile to make clinical decisions in primary care settings is low. A recent pilot program was initiated at MetroHealth System (Cleveland, Ohio) to implement a CGM integration program for primary care offices throughout the system. Based on the experience and successes from this health system as well as current literature, rationale will be discussed to support the expansion of CGM to individuals enrolled in all Medicaid programs.
{"title":"Best practices and rationale for expanding Medicaid access to continuous glucose monitoring.","authors":"Cynthia A King, Amber N Lilly","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s40","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10-b.s40","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies have demonstrated that use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) significantly improves overall glycemic control and reduces the frequency and severity of hypoglycemic events in individuals treated with intensive insulin, nonintensive insulin, and noninsulin therapies, with reductions in both all-cause and diabetes-related health care resource utilization and lower costs. However, implementation of CGM including prescribing and assessment of the ambulatory glucose profile to make clinical decisions in primary care settings is low. A recent pilot program was initiated at MetroHealth System (Cleveland, Ohio) to implement a CGM integration program for primary care offices throughout the system. Based on the experience and successes from this health system as well as current literature, rationale will be discussed to support the expansion of CGM to individuals enrolled in all Medicaid programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-16DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.24104
Sean D Sullivan, Sophia Z Humphreys, David Fox, Catherine M Lockhart, Ashley Tait-Dinger, Juan Diego Betancourt, Kenneth M Komorny, Ryan Haumschild, Barry Chester, Matthew Harman, Joshua A Roth
Biologic therapies play a critical role in modern medical practice but also present challenges for payers, patients, and other stakeholders because of their high cost. Biosimilars can mitigate the cost pressures of reference biologic therapy because they are typically priced at least 25% lower, providing a means to administer cutting-edge biologic therapy while also managing cost of care. In fact, the US health care system has saved an estimated $23.6 billion from use of biosimilars. However, the market is still in a nascent phase of development, and early cost-saving successes are not guaranteed to persist unless sustainable market conditions are established. To better understand the perspectives of stakeholders about opportunities and threats to the sustainability of the US biosimilar market, a multistakeholder roundtable discussion was convened in December of 2023 and included health care payers, providers, self-insured employers, a manufacturer, and a biosimilar research and advocacy organization. The objective of this commentary, authored by the roundtable participants, is to posit specific opportunities and threats that stakeholders should consider to better facilitate sustainable biosimilar market conditions in the United States. We highlight key points, including (1) biosimilar price volatility with large quarter-on-quarter declines for most products; (2) perverse economic incentives that encourage providers to use more expensive reference products because reimbursement dynamics make them more profitable; (3) complex rebate structures that create barriers to biosimilar access; and (4) ongoing changes to the legal and regulatory environment, including evidence requirements to gain "interchangeable" status. We conclude with an overview of potential policy solutions to address the sustainability opportunities and threats. The authors welcome the opportunity to advance this dialogue toward action and encourage additional stakeholders to join the effort. We are optimistic that, through informed decision-making and compromise, we can collectively achieve a robust and sustainable US biosimilars market that appropriately benefits all stakeholders.
{"title":"Stakeholder perspectives on the sustainability of the United States biosimilars market.","authors":"Sean D Sullivan, Sophia Z Humphreys, David Fox, Catherine M Lockhart, Ashley Tait-Dinger, Juan Diego Betancourt, Kenneth M Komorny, Ryan Haumschild, Barry Chester, Matthew Harman, Joshua A Roth","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.24104","DOIUrl":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.24104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biologic therapies play a critical role in modern medical practice but also present challenges for payers, patients, and other stakeholders because of their high cost. Biosimilars can mitigate the cost pressures of reference biologic therapy because they are typically priced at least 25% lower, providing a means to administer cutting-edge biologic therapy while also managing cost of care. In fact, the US health care system has saved an estimated $23.6 billion from use of biosimilars. However, the market is still in a nascent phase of development, and early cost-saving successes are not guaranteed to persist unless sustainable market conditions are established. To better understand the perspectives of stakeholders about opportunities and threats to the sustainability of the US biosimilar market, a multistakeholder roundtable discussion was convened in December of 2023 and included health care payers, providers, self-insured employers, a manufacturer, and a biosimilar research and advocacy organization. The objective of this commentary, authored by the roundtable participants, is to posit specific opportunities and threats that stakeholders should consider to better facilitate sustainable biosimilar market conditions in the United States. We highlight key points, including (1) biosimilar price volatility with large quarter-on-quarter declines for most products; (2) perverse economic incentives that encourage providers to use more expensive reference products because reimbursement dynamics make them more profitable; (3) complex rebate structures that create barriers to biosimilar access; and (4) ongoing changes to the legal and regulatory environment, including evidence requirements to gain \"interchangeable\" status. We conclude with an overview of potential policy solutions to address the sustainability opportunities and threats. The authors welcome the opportunity to advance this dialogue toward action and encourage additional stakeholders to join the effort. We are optimistic that, through informed decision-making and compromise, we can collectively achieve a robust and sustainable US biosimilars market that appropriately benefits all stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424910/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141620175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.24106
Michael Charlton, Ivy Tonnu-Mihara, Chia-Chen Teng, Ziqi Zhou, Feven Asefaha, Rakesh Luthra, Amy Articolo, Anthony Hoovler, Chioma Uzoigwe
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; formerly nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) is the inflammatory form of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (formerly nonalcoholic fatty liver disease). MASH is a progressive disease associated with increased risk for many hepatic and extra-hepatic complications such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, the requirement for liver transplantation, and cardiovascular (CV)-related and kidney-related complications. It is important to understand the clinical and economic burden of MASH.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare the clinical and economic burdens of MASH in adults with the non-MASH population in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, retrospective study used the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD), which contains health care claims data for commercially insured and Medicare Advantage health plan members across the United States. All-cause, CV-related, and liver-related medical costs and health care resource utilization were evaluated in patients with at least 2 diagnoses of MASH during the patient identification period (October 1, 2016, to April 30, 2022) and compared with a non-MASH cohort 1:1 matched on age, Quan Charlson Comorbidity Index, region of residence, and health plan type and length of enrollment. Generalized linear regression with negative binomial and γ distribution models were used to compare health care resource utilization and medical costs, respectively, while controlling for confounders. Covariate-adjusted all-cause, CV-related, and liver-related hospitalization rate ratios and medical cost ratios were assessed and compared for the MASH and matched non-MASH cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18,549 patients with MASH were compared with 18,549 matched patients in the non-MASH cohort. After adjusting for covariates, MASH was associated with significantly higher rates of hospitalization and higher medical costs compared with the non-MASH cohort. When compared with the non-MASH cohort, patients with MASH had 1.22 (95% CI = 1.15-1.30; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher rates of all-cause hospitalization, 1.13 (95% CI = 1.03-1.24; <i>P</i> = 0.008) times higher rates of CV-related hospitalization, and 7.22 (95% CI = 4.91-10.61; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher rates of liver-related hospitalization. Similarly, all-cause medical costs were 1.26 (95% CI = 1.22-1.30; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher, CV-related medical costs were 1.66 (95% CI = 1.59-1.73; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher, and liver-related medical costs were 7.79 (95% CI = 7.42-8.17; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher among patients with MASH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with those of the non-MASH cohort with similar age, Quan Charlson Comorbidity Index, health plan, region of residence, and duration of enrollment, patients with MASH had significantly higher all-cause, CV
{"title":"Evaluating the burden of illness of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis in a large managed care population: The ETHEREAL Study.","authors":"Michael Charlton, Ivy Tonnu-Mihara, Chia-Chen Teng, Ziqi Zhou, Feven Asefaha, Rakesh Luthra, Amy Articolo, Anthony Hoovler, Chioma Uzoigwe","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.24106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.24106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; formerly nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) is the inflammatory form of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (formerly nonalcoholic fatty liver disease). MASH is a progressive disease associated with increased risk for many hepatic and extra-hepatic complications such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, the requirement for liver transplantation, and cardiovascular (CV)-related and kidney-related complications. It is important to understand the clinical and economic burden of MASH.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare the clinical and economic burdens of MASH in adults with the non-MASH population in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, retrospective study used the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD), which contains health care claims data for commercially insured and Medicare Advantage health plan members across the United States. All-cause, CV-related, and liver-related medical costs and health care resource utilization were evaluated in patients with at least 2 diagnoses of MASH during the patient identification period (October 1, 2016, to April 30, 2022) and compared with a non-MASH cohort 1:1 matched on age, Quan Charlson Comorbidity Index, region of residence, and health plan type and length of enrollment. Generalized linear regression with negative binomial and γ distribution models were used to compare health care resource utilization and medical costs, respectively, while controlling for confounders. Covariate-adjusted all-cause, CV-related, and liver-related hospitalization rate ratios and medical cost ratios were assessed and compared for the MASH and matched non-MASH cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18,549 patients with MASH were compared with 18,549 matched patients in the non-MASH cohort. After adjusting for covariates, MASH was associated with significantly higher rates of hospitalization and higher medical costs compared with the non-MASH cohort. When compared with the non-MASH cohort, patients with MASH had 1.22 (95% CI = 1.15-1.30; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher rates of all-cause hospitalization, 1.13 (95% CI = 1.03-1.24; <i>P</i> = 0.008) times higher rates of CV-related hospitalization, and 7.22 (95% CI = 4.91-10.61; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher rates of liver-related hospitalization. Similarly, all-cause medical costs were 1.26 (95% CI = 1.22-1.30; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher, CV-related medical costs were 1.66 (95% CI = 1.59-1.73; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher, and liver-related medical costs were 7.79 (95% CI = 7.42-8.17; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) times higher among patients with MASH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with those of the non-MASH cohort with similar age, Quan Charlson Comorbidity Index, health plan, region of residence, and duration of enrollment, patients with MASH had significantly higher all-cause, CV","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}